Re: Installing Seamonkey 2.53.3

Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote: Bill Spikowski wrote: NFN Smith wrote: Bill Spikowski wrote: I'm trying to update my Seamonkey 2.49.5 installations on Win10 and Win7 computers. The installations seem to work fine; but then a couple hours later, I see that SM has regressed to version 2.49.5.

Re: Installing Seamonkey 2.53.3

Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote: Be warned that "running both versions at once" is a very dangerous - ok, suicidal - thing to do with those two versions. When you move from a 2.49.x (or older) version to a 2.53.x version, the profile undergoes some migration reformatting which renders part of

Re: Installing Seamonkey 2.53.3

Bill Spikowski wrote: NFN Smith wrote: Bill Spikowski wrote: I'm trying to update my Seamonkey 2.49.5 installations on Win10 and Win7 computers. The installations seem to work fine; but then a couple hours later, I see that SM has regressed to version 2.49.5. This has happened twice each

Re: Installing Seamonkey 2.53.3

NFN Smith wrote: Bill Spikowski wrote: I'm trying to update my Seamonkey 2.49.5 installations on Win10 and Win7 computers. The installations seem to work fine; but then a couple hours later, I see that SM has regressed to version 2.49.5. This has happened twice each on two different Win10

Re: Installing Seamonkey 2.53.3

Bill Spikowski wrote: I'm trying to update my Seamonkey 2.49.5 installations on Win10 and Win7 computers. The installations seem to work fine; but then a couple hours later, I see that SM has regressed to version 2.49.5. This has happened twice each on two different Win10 computers. I've

Re: Installing Seamonkey 2.53.3

Bob Fleischer wrote: Bill Spikowski wrote: I'm trying to update my Seamonkey 2.49.5 installations on Win10 and Win7 computers. The installations seem to work fine; but then a couple hours later, I see that SM has regressed to version 2.49.5. This has happened twice each on two different

Re: Installing Seamonkey 2.53.3

Bill Spikowski wrote: I'm trying to update my Seamonkey 2.49.5 installations on Win10 and Win7 computers. The installations seem to work fine; but then a couple hours later, I see that SM has regressed to version 2.49.5. This has happened twice each on two different Win10 computers. I've

Re: Installing SeaMonkey on Linux - Clairification request

On 04/05/2017 06:54 PM, WaltS48 wrote: On 4/5/17 7:04 PM, Richard Owlett wrote: On 04/05/2017 05:50 PM, WaltS48 wrote: On 4/5/17 11:29 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: My target machine is a laptop with multiple users having Debian Jessie with MATE desktop. I'll use the package from

Re: Installing SeaMonkey on Linux - Clairification request

On 4/5/17 8:17 PM, Richard Owlett wrote: On 04/05/2017 06:54 PM, WaltS48 wrote: On 4/5/17 7:04 PM, Richard Owlett wrote: On 04/05/2017 05:50 PM, WaltS48 wrote: On 4/5/17 11:29 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: My target machine is a laptop with multiple users having Debian Jessie with MATE desktop.

Re: Installing SeaMonkey on Linux - Clairification request

On 04/05/2017 06:54 PM, WaltS48 wrote: On 4/5/17 7:04 PM, Richard Owlett wrote: On 04/05/2017 05:50 PM, WaltS48 wrote: On 4/5/17 11:29 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: My target machine is a laptop with multiple users having Debian Jessie with MATE desktop. I'll use the package from

Re: Installing SeaMonkey on Linux - Clairification request

On 4/5/17 7:04 PM, Richard Owlett wrote: On 04/05/2017 05:50 PM, WaltS48 wrote: On 4/5/17 11:29 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: My target machine is a laptop with multiple users having Debian Jessie with MATE desktop. I'll use the package from https://www.seamonkey-project.org/ rather than from

Re: Installing SeaMonkey on Linux - Clairification request

On 4/5/17 7:04 PM, Richard Owlett wrote: On 04/05/2017 05:50 PM, WaltS48 wrote: On 4/5/17 11:29 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: My target machine is a laptop with multiple users having Debian Jessie with MATE desktop. I'll use the package from https://www.seamonkey-project.org/ rather than from

Re: Installing SeaMonkey on Linux - Clairification request

On 04/05/2017 05:50 PM, WaltS48 wrote: On 4/5/17 11:29 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: My target machine is a laptop with multiple users having Debian Jessie with MATE desktop. I'll use the package from https://www.seamonkey-project.org/ rather than from Debian repository. I wish clarification of

Re: Installing SeaMonkey on Linux - Clairification request

On 4/5/17 11:29 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: My target machine is a laptop with multiple users having Debian Jessie with MATE desktop. I'll use the package from https://www.seamonkey-project.org/ rather than from Debian repository. I wish clarification of instructions at

Re: Installing SeaMonkey on Linux - Clairification request

On 04/05/2017 05:32 PM, Jonathan N. Little wrote: Richard Owlett wrote: My target machine is a laptop with multiple users having Debian Jessie with MATE desktop. I'll use the package from https://www.seamonkey-project.org/ rather than from Debian repository. I wish clarification of

Re: Installing SeaMonkey on Linux - Clairification request

Richard Owlett wrote: My target machine is a laptop with multiple users having Debian Jessie with MATE desktop. I'll use the package from https://www.seamonkey-project.org/ rather than from Debian repository. I wish clarification of instructions at

Re: Installing Seamonkey in Debian Jessie (stable)

In , NFN Smith wrote: > Beyond that, I believe that I've seen in news fairly recently that > Debian and Mozilla are in the process of settling their differences > (Mozilla logos, and Debian adjustments to Mozilla code),

Re: Installing Seamonkey in Debian Jessie (stable)

There is no IceApe or SeaMonkey in debian anymore. https://threatpost.com/debian-announces-end-of-security-support-for-iceape/103203/ Its hard to get a official build that is working on 64bit debian computers :( 2016-03-11 20:57 GMT+01:00 NFN Smith : > Matthias Mueller

Re: Installing Seamonkey in Debian Jessie (stable)

Bret Busby wrote: On 12/03/2016, NFN Smith wrote: Beyond that, I believe that I've seen in news fairly recently that Debian and Mozilla are in the process of settling their differences (Mozilla logos, and Debian adjustments to Mozilla code), and that before long, we

Re: Installing Seamonkey in Debian Jessie (stable)

On 12/03/2016, NFN Smith wrote: > > Beyond that, I believe that I've seen in news fairly recently that > Debian and Mozilla are in the process of settling their differences > (Mozilla logos, and Debian adjustments to Mozilla code), and that before > long, we may see

Re: Installing Seamonkey in Debian Jessie (stable)

Matthias Mueller wrote: i am relatively new to linux and trying to get Seamonkey to work. There is no package in the Debian Repositories. I have tried to unpack and start Seamonkey this way: " http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/install-and-uninstall;. Unpacked inside my homefolder

Re: Installing Seamonkey in Debian Jessie (stable)

i give up on compiling for now. The unofficial contributed version is working on my machine: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#contrib 2016-03-09 16:50 GMT+01:00 Matthias Mueller : > Hi, > > i am relatively new to linux and trying to get Seamonkey to work.

Re: Installing Seamonkey in Debian Jessie (stable)

its not working for debian http://pastebin.com/9EvZuLbU the same happens with the 32bit version http://pastebin.com/Hi6GkvES 2016-03-09 18:52 GMT+01:00 Bret Busby : > On 09/03/2016, Matthias Mueller wrote: > > Hi, > > > > i am relatively new

Re: Installing Seamonkey in Debian Jessie (stable)

Matthias Mueller wrote: Hi, i am relatively new to linux and trying to get Seamonkey to work. There is no package in the Debian Repositories. I have tried to unpack and start Seamonkey this way: " http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/install-and-uninstall;. Unpacked inside my homefolder

Re: Installing Seamonkey in Debian Jessie (stable)

On 09/03/2016, Matthias Mueller wrote: > Hi, > > i am relatively new to linux and trying to get Seamonkey to work. There is > no package in the Debian Repositories. > Have you tried

Re: Installing Seamonkey in Debian Jessie (stable)

Is the X server and the package libxrender installed? You also seem to miss alot of the gtk2 packages so the configure barks. If you have gtk2 installed maybe only the dev packages with the headers and libraries are missing? Which gcc is installed? On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 16:50:12 +0100, Matthias

Re: Installing Seamonkey 2.17.1 Questions

Hartmut Figge wrote, On 27/04/2013 03:36: DoctorBill: Still hanging on to XP by my fingernails. XP is too complicated for me, so i am using Linux. *g* Hartmut I was obliged to work 5 years with a unix system, i have seen how complicated Linux is ...

Re: Installing Seamonkey 2.17.1 Questions

DoctorBill wrote: A Williams wrote: DoctorBill wrote: I have a rather 'computer illiterate' friend who has NEVER had SeaMonkey on his two Computers. I have convinced him to install SM. I want to help him as best I can. He has desktop is running XP and his new laptop is running Windows 8. BTW

Re: Installing Seamonkey 2.17.1 Questions

DoctorBill wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: DoctorBill: Still hanging on to XP by my fingernails. XP is too complicated for me, so i am using Linux. *g* Hartmut Well - just about the time I get comfortable with a Windows Version, old Bill Gates changes itthen goes about his life as a

Re: Installing Seamonkey 2.17.1 Questions

A Williams wrote: Bill Gates left years ago, blame Steve Balmer. There are persistent rumours that SP1 for Win8 is going to include a setting you can use to make it look like Win7. There is some App available on the 'net which already does that and it has over a million downloads. Even

Re: Installing Seamonkey 2.17.1 Questions

Ray_Net wrote: XP is too complicated for me, so i am using Linux. *g* I was obliged to work 5 years with a unix system, i have seen how complicated Linux is ... One of the interesting things is that Mozilla has become the default Linux browser, no sign of IE, Chrome or Safari (by

Re: Installing Seamonkey 2.17.1 Questions

On 04/26/2013 09:34 AM, DoctorBill wrote: I have a rather 'computer illiterate' friend who has NEVER had SeaMonkey on his two Computers. I have convinced him to install SM. I want to help him as best I can. He has desktop is running XP and his new laptop is running Windows 8. BTW - He still

Re: Installing Seamonkey 2.17.1 Questions

DoctorBill wrote: I have a rather 'computer illiterate' friend who has NEVER had SeaMonkey on his two Computers. I have convinced him to install SM. I want to help him as best I can. He has desktop is running XP and his new laptop is running Windows 8. BTW - He still uses a Modem for reasons

Re: Installing Seamonkey 2.17.1 Questions

On 04/26/2013 09:58 AM, A Williams wrote: DoctorBill wrote: I have a rather 'computer illiterate' friend who has NEVER had SeaMonkey on his two Computers. I have convinced him to install SM. I want to help him as best I can. He has desktop is running XP and his new laptop is running Windows 8.

Re: Installing Seamonkey 2.17.1 Questions

A Williams wrote: DoctorBill wrote: I have a rather 'computer illiterate' friend who has NEVER had SeaMonkey on his two Computers. I have convinced him to install SM. I want to help him as best I can. He has desktop is running XP and his new laptop is running Windows 8. BTW - He still uses a

Re: Installing Seamonkey 2.17.1 Questions

DoctorBill wrote: I have a rather 'computer illiterate' friend who has NEVER had SeaMonkey on his two Computers. I have convinced him to install SM. I want to help him as best I can. He has desktop is running XP and his new laptop is running Windows 8. BTW - He still uses a Modem for reasons

Re: Installing Seamonkey 2.17.1 Questions

Interviewed by CNN on 26/04/2013 18:14, DoctorBill told the world: He also has an Apple computer he hates - but he asked me if SM can be installed on an Apple Computercan it ? The answer is both Yes and It depends. Yes, there are Seamonkey versions for all Macs built since... well, in

Re: Installing Seamonkey 2.17.1 Questions

MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 26/04/2013 18:14, DoctorBill told the world: He also has an Apple computer he hates - but he asked me if SM can be installed on an Apple Computercan it ? The answer is both Yes and It depends. Yes, there are Seamonkey versions for all Macs built

Re: Installing Seamonkey 2.17.1 Questions

DoctorBill: Still hanging on to XP by my fingernails. XP is too complicated for me, so i am using Linux. *g* Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Installing Seamonkey 2.17.1 Questions

Hartmut Figge wrote: DoctorBill: Still hanging on to XP by my fingernails. XP is too complicated for me, so i am using Linux. *g* Hartmut Well - just about the time I get comfortable with a Windows Version, old Bill Gates changes itthen goes about his life as a Gozillionaire.

Re: re-installing seamonkey

Mike C wrote: LMH wrote: JD wrote: LMH wrote: Mike C wrote: LMH wrote: I currently have seamonkey 2.4.1 installed and it is possible that I have had a security breach. I would like to re-install seamonkey, but I need to be able to do that without losing my profiles (which are stored on

Re: re-installing seamonkey

JD wrote: LMH wrote: Mike C wrote: LMH wrote: I currently have seamonkey 2.4.1 installed and it is possible that I have had a security breach. I would like to re-install seamonkey, but I need to be able to do that without losing my profiles (which are stored on another drive from the

Re: re-installing seamonkey

LMH wrote: JD wrote: LMH wrote: Mike C wrote: LMH wrote: I currently have seamonkey 2.4.1 installed and it is possible that I have had a security breach. I would like to re-install seamonkey, but I need to be able to do that without losing my profiles (which are stored on another drive from

Re: re-installing seamonkey

Mike C wrote: LMH wrote: I currently have seamonkey 2.4.1 installed and it is possible that I have had a security breach. I would like to re-install seamonkey, but I need to be able to do that without losing my profiles (which are stored on another drive from the seamonkey install folder). Is

Re: re-installing seamonkey

Mike C wrote: LMH wrote: I currently have seamonkey 2.4.1 installed and it is possible that I have had a security breach. I would like to re-install seamonkey, but I need to be able to do that without losing my profiles (which are stored on another drive from the seamonkey install folder). Is

Re: re-installing seamonkey

LMH wrote: Mike C wrote: LMH wrote: I currently have seamonkey 2.4.1 installed and it is possible that I have had a security breach. I would like to re-install seamonkey, but I need to be able to do that without losing my profiles (which are stored on another drive from the seamonkey install

re-installing seamonkey

I currently have seamonkey 2.4.1 installed and it is possible that I have had a security breach. I would like to re-install seamonkey, but I need to be able to do that without losing my profiles (which are stored on another drive from the seamonkey install folder). Is there a tutorial on how

Re: re-installing seamonkey

JD wrote: LMH wrote: I currently have seamonkey 2.4.1 installed and it is possible that I have had a security breach. I would like to re-install seamonkey, but I need to be able to do that without losing my profiles (which are stored on another drive from the seamonkey install folder). Is

Re: re-installing seamonkey

LMH wrote: I currently have seamonkey 2.4.1 installed and it is possible that I have had a security breach. I would like to re-install seamonkey, but I need to be able to do that without losing my profiles (which are stored on another drive from the seamonkey install folder). Is there a

Re: Installing Seamonkey manually vs via Synaptic / Apt (Ubuntu / Mint)

NoOp wrote: On 05/23/2010 02:23 PM, Jens Hatlak wrote: Rob Lindauer wrote: The Seamonkey install instructions I've been using (successfully) for a year or two have me expand the Seamonkey tar/bz2 file into a subdirectory under home, and manually add an entry in my Gnome/Kde menu, as opposed to

Re: Installing Seamonkey manually vs via Synaptic / Apt (Ubuntu / Mint)

Jens Hatlak wrote: Rob Lindauer wrote: The Seamonkey install instructions I've been using (successfully) for a year or two have me expand the Seamonkey tar/bz2 file into a subdirectory under home, and manually add an entry in my Gnome/Kde menu, as opposed to installing via Synaptic/Apt. The

Re: Installing Seamonkey manually vs via Synaptic / Apt (Ubuntu / Mint)

On 05/25/2010 04:40 PM, Tony wrote: ... I have a related question - I have set up my laptop with Ubuntu 10.4 LTS and installed 2.0.4 from the Ubuntu Software Respository. Seems to be working fine but no mail/news just browser composer. I think I see the appropriate files for mail/news but

Re: Installing Seamonkey manually vs via Synaptic / Apt (Ubuntu / Mint)

Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 23 May 2010 15:54:26 -0700, NoOp wrote: On 05/23/2010 02:23 PM, Jens Hatlak wrote: Basically all extensions that have default preferences and/or components. All these had to be installed somewhere under the SeaMonkey application directory. You might have

Re: Installing Seamonkey manually vs via Synaptic / Apt (Ubuntu / Mint)

On 05/23/2010 09:25 PM, Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 23 May 2010 15:54:26 -0700, NoOp wrote: On 05/23/2010 02:23 PM, Jens Hatlak wrote: With SeaMonkey versions before 2.0 there were extensions that needed to be installed into the application directory so you needed access to that directory,

Re: Installing Seamonkey manually vs via Synaptic / Apt (Ubuntu / Mint)

NoOp wrote: On 05/23/2010 09:25 PM, Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 23 May 2010 15:54:26 -0700, NoOp wrote: Can you please advise which extensions required root access? Note: not a confrontational question, just curious as this is the first I've heard of this. Basically all extensions that have

Re: Installing Seamonkey manually vs via Synaptic / Apt (Ubuntu / Mint)

Mon, 24 May 2010 21:38:51 +0200, /Jens Hatlak/: NoOp wrote: /home/username/seamonkey119/./seamonkey -no-remote -mail -browser BTW: -no-remote does nothing with SeaMonkey version prior to 2.0. Just remove it. I remember this has come up before

Re: Installing Seamonkey manually vs via Synaptic / Apt (Ubuntu / Mint)

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Mon, 24 May 2010 21:38:51 +0200, /Jens Hatlak/: NoOp wrote: /home/username/seamonkey119/./seamonkey -no-remote -mail -browser BTW: -no-remote does nothing with SeaMonkey version prior to 2.0. Just remove it. I remember this has come up before

Re: Installing Seamonkey manually vs via Synaptic / Apt (Ubuntu / Mint)

On 05/24/2010 12:38 PM, Jens Hatlak wrote: NoOp wrote: On 05/23/2010 09:25 PM, Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 23 May 2010 15:54:26 -0700, NoOp wrote: Can you please advise which extensions required root access? Note: not a confrontational question, just curious as this is the first I've heard of

Re: Installing Seamonkey manually vs via Synaptic / Apt (Ubuntu / Mint)

On 05/23/2010 12:27 PM, Rob Lindauer wrote: The Seamonkey install instructions I've been using (successfully) for a year or two have me expand the Seamonkey tar/bz2 file into a subdirectory under home, and manually add an entry in my Gnome/Kde menu, as opposed to installing via

Re: Installing Seamonkey manually vs via Synaptic / Apt (Ubuntu / Mint)

Rob Lindauer wrote: The Seamonkey install instructions I've been using (successfully) for a year or two have me expand the Seamonkey tar/bz2 file into a subdirectory under home, and manually add an entry in my Gnome/Kde menu, as opposed to installing via Synaptic/Apt. The rationale as I recall

Re: Installing Seamonkey manually vs via Synaptic / Apt (Ubuntu / Mint)

NoOp wrote: On 05/23/2010 12:27 PM, Rob Lindauer wrote: The Seamonkey install instructions I've been using (successfully) for a year or two have me expand the Seamonkey tar/bz2 file into a subdirectory under home, and manually add an entry in my Gnome/Kde menu, as opposed to installing via

Re: Installing Seamonkey manually vs via Synaptic / Apt (Ubuntu / Mint)

On 05/23/2010 06:31 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: NoOp wrote: ... Or, if you want an 'unofficial' Ubuntu system install that works (32bit 63bit): 63 bit? Yeah... I was watching the Sharks get wooped by the Blackhawks at the time dropped a bit in the process :-)

Re: Installing Seamonkey manually vs via Synaptic / Apt (Ubuntu / Mint)

NoOp wrote: On 05/23/2010 06:31 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: NoOp wrote: ... Or, if you want an 'unofficial' Ubuntu system install that works (32bit 63bit): 63 bit? Yeah... I was watching the Sharks get wooped by the Blackhawks at the time dropped a bit in the process :-) Thought maybe

Re: Installing Seamonkey manually vs via Synaptic / Apt (Ubuntu / Mint)

On Sun, 23 May 2010 15:54:26 -0700, NoOp wrote: On 05/23/2010 02:23 PM, Jens Hatlak wrote: With SeaMonkey versions before 2.0 there were extensions that needed to be installed into the application directory so you needed access to that directory, which usually meant you needed to be root.