Re: Ignore please.

2014-06-30 Thread Ant
On 6/29/2014 7:24 PM PT, Hartmut Figge typed: I could test the success of the cancel myself with 'Repair Folder' under Properties. Not necessary now. ;) but it's still there Then it seems, that a successful cancel is not possible here *g* And many usenet servers like GigaNews. :( --

Re: Ignore please.

2014-06-30 Thread Hartmut Figge
Ant: On 6/29/2014 7:24 PM PT, Hartmut Figge typed: Then it seems, that a successful cancel is not possible here *g* And many usenet servers like GigaNews. :( In the case of news.mozilla.org the behavior is not unreasonable. There is a gateway between the news server and the mailing lists, and

Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1

2014-06-30 Thread Richard Owlett
This comes under heading of unintended consequences. I just updated from SM 2.17.1 to 2.26.1. In browser: I have my preferences set to display a blank page on startup. In 2.17 that resulted in displaying a blank page *AND* an empty(blank) address bar. With 2.17 there is a reminder that the

Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1

2014-06-30 Thread Hartmut Figge
Richard Owlett: In browser: I have my preferences set to display a blank page on startup. In 2.17 that resulted in displaying a blank page *AND* an empty(blank) address bar. With 2.17 there is a reminder that the address bar is for address/search terms. The same is true for my 2.30a1.

Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1

2014-06-30 Thread Daniel
On 30/06/14 22:26, Hartmut Figge wrote: Richard Owlett: Snip In mail/news: Signature block (correct term?) now appears in lighter type than body of the post. I find this annoying. Once again, any work-around? That i have not noticed. I modify the display of the sig since many years.

Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1

2014-06-30 Thread Hartmut Figge
Daniel: On 30/06/14 22:26, Hartmut Figge wrote: - userContent.css - .moz-txt-sig, .moz-signature { background-color: #f0f0f0; } --- You could set your own preferred values. :) Hartmut, your pref is changing the background colour (or color, :-) ). How does that effect

Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1

2014-06-30 Thread WaltS48
On 06/30/2014 09:50 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote: Daniel: On 30/06/14 22:26, Hartmut Figge wrote: - userContent.css - .moz-txt-sig, .moz-signature { background-color: #f0f0f0; } --- You could set your own preferred values. :) Hartmut, your pref is changing the background

Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1

2014-06-30 Thread WaltS48
Richard Owlett wrote: This comes under heading of unintended consequences. I just updated from SM 2.17.1 to 2.26.1. In browser: I have my preferences set to display a blank page on startup. In 2.17 that resulted in displaying a blank page *AND* an empty(blank) address bar. With 2.17 there

Re: transfer bookmarks

2014-06-30 Thread Ed Mullen
Juiceman pounded out : Rufus wrote: Juiceman wrote: I would like to copy my bookmarks on my laptop computer to my other computer. What files do I need to copy for my other computer to display the bookmarks? There are a couple of ways to do this - 1) you can copy the places.sqlite file from

Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1

2014-06-30 Thread Hartmut Figge
WaltS48: As long as I see it as lighter text when I'm viewing an email or post, whatever is done doesn't matter. Depends. The reason why i changed the background color was to be able to see trailing blank lines. There was a time when blank lines were appended after a sig. This bug has been

Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1

2014-06-30 Thread Hartmut Figge
WaltS48: On 06/30/2014 10:32 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote: Why do i still modify the background color of sigs? It does not disturb me, it may be convenient in the future and i can spare the effort of commenting out the modification. ;) But does it disturb your recipients? How? Modifications to

Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1

2014-06-30 Thread WaltS48
On 06/30/2014 10:32 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote: WaltS48: As long as I see it as lighter text when I'm viewing an email or post, whatever is done doesn't matter. Depends. The reason why i changed the background color was to be able to see trailing blank lines. There was a time when blank lines

Re: Ignore please.

2014-06-30 Thread Ant
On 6/30/2014 4:58 AM PT, Hartmut Figge typed: Then it seems, that a successful cancel is not possible here *g* And many usenet servers like GigaNews. :( In the case of news.mozilla.org the behavior is not unreasonable. There is a gateway between the news server and the mailing lists, and to

Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1

2014-06-30 Thread WaltS48
On 06/30/2014 10:39 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote: WaltS48: On 06/30/2014 10:32 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote: Why do i still modify the background color of sigs? It does not disturb me, it may be convenient in the future and i can spare the effort of commenting out the modification. ;) But does it

Re: Ignore please.

2014-06-30 Thread Hartmut Figge
Ant: On 6/30/2014 4:58 AM PT, Hartmut Figge typed: In the case of news.mozilla.org the behavior is not unreasonable. There is a gateway between the news server and the mailing lists, and to cancel a mail is impossible. *g* Ah. So it never worked as intended in the past world-wide? :( Cancels

Re: Fixed -- Adobe Flash Player 11.3 - Bug 3223393: [Platform_Windows]Windows-7: Firefox Window loses focus every time Flash plugin processes are (re-)launched

2014-06-30 Thread Larry
Ant wrote: https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bugid=3223393 Hi, this issue is fixed in internal build, you can get next beta build from http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashruntimes/flashplayer/ to verify your issue. Thanks! --Jing Yuan on 3:13:50 AM GMT+00:00 Jun 17, 2014 Finally

Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1

2014-06-30 Thread Hartmut Figge
WaltS48: The OP wants to read messages received without the signature being in lighter text. That is what I thought your instructions were explaining how to do. That was my intention. That he is able to change the display of sigs on his own machine. Hartmut

Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1

2014-06-30 Thread David E. Ross
On 6/30/2014 5:08 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: This comes under heading of unintended consequences. I just updated from SM 2.17.1 to 2.26.1. In browser: I have my preferences set to display a blank page on startup. In 2.17 that resulted in displaying a blank page *AND* an empty(blank)

[no subject]

2014-06-30 Thread 8437890616
Title: New Page 1 Fuck off Sent from my Cricket mobile device Fuck off ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

[no subject]

2014-06-30 Thread 8437890616
Title: New Page 1 U have been reported to FCC Sent from my Cricket mobile device U have been reported to FCC ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

[no subject]

2014-06-30 Thread 8437890616
Title: New Page 1 REMOVE , STOP Sent from my Cricket mobile device REMOVE , STOP ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

[no subject]

2014-06-30 Thread 8437890616
Title: New Page 1 U HAVE BEEN REPORTED TO FCC , TAKE ME THE FUCK OFF OR I WILL FILE CHARGES Sent from my Cricket mobile device U HAVE BEEN REPORTED TO FCC , TAKE ME THE FUCK OFF OR I WILL FILE CHARGES ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: Fixed -- Adobe Flash Player 11.3 - Bug 3223393: [Platform_Windows]Windows-7: Firefox Window loses focus every time Flash plugin processes are (re-)launched

2014-06-30 Thread WaltS48
Larry wrote: Ant wrote: https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bugid=3223393 Hi, this issue is fixed in internal build, you can get next beta build from http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashruntimes/flashplayer/ to verify your issue. Thanks! --Jing Yuan on 3:13:50 AM GMT+00:00 Jun 17,

Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1

2014-06-30 Thread Richard Owlett
WaltS48 wrote: Richard Owlett wrote: This comes under heading of unintended consequences. I just updated from SM 2.17.1 to 2.26.1. In browser: I have my preferences set to display a blank page on startup. In 2.17 that resulted in displaying a blank page *AND* an empty(blank) address bar.

Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1

2014-06-30 Thread Richard Owlett
David E. Ross wrote: On 6/30/2014 5:08 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: This comes under heading of unintended consequences. I just updated from SM 2.17.1 to 2.26.1. In browser: I have my preferences set to display a blank page on startup. In 2.17 that resulted in displaying a blank page *AND*

Re: Fixed -- Adobe Flash Player 11.3 - Bug 3223393: [Platform_Windows]Windows-7: Firefox Window loses focus every time Flash plugin processes are (re-)launched

2014-06-30 Thread Larry
WaltS48 wrote: Larry wrote: Ant wrote: https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bugid=3223393 Hi, this issue is fixed in internal build, you can get next beta build from http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashruntimes/flashplayer/ to verify your issue. Thanks! --Jing Yuan on 3:13:50 AM

Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1

2014-06-30 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 30/06/2014 13:38, Richard Owlett told the world: WaltS48 wrote: The signature block has always been lighter than the message body when viewing posted messages. Evidently not for Windows XP users. I notice your User Agent says Linux. Uh, no, I used XP for years and it

Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1

2014-06-30 Thread EE
Richard Owlett wrote: This comes under heading of unintended consequences. I just updated from SM 2.17.1 to 2.26.1. In browser: I have my preferences set to display a blank page on startup. In 2.17 that resulted in displaying a blank page *AND* an empty(blank) address bar. With 2.17 there

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-30 Thread EE
Hartmut Figge wrote: EE wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Trane Francks: [https://soundcloud.com/steveduzz/game-of-thrones-main-theme-80s-version] It certainly auto-played here! Try it with unchecked 'Advertise Firefox compatibility'. ;) I am using Firefox compatibility. That audio did not

Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?

2014-06-30 Thread Ant
I much prefer to have to click a play button to get an audio item to play rather than have it start by itself. I am going to leave things alone. Ditto. :) -- /\___/\ / /\ /\ \ Worker Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) | |o o| | Ant's Quality Foraged Links

Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1

2014-06-30 Thread Trane Francks
On 7/1/14 1:38 AM +0900, Richard Owlett wrote: WaltS48 wrote: Richard Owlett wrote: This comes under heading of unintended consequences. I just updated from SM 2.17.1 to 2.26.1. In browser: I have my preferences set to display a blank page on startup. In 2.17 that resulted in displaying a

Re: Google Play Store...

2014-06-30 Thread SamuelS
On 23-May-14 23:12, SamuelS wrote: Hello all, I Am having a challenge with getting the google play store to load on SM 2.26 using Win 8.0. All I receive is a blank page. Any suggestions as to what I need to consider or re-configure to get this page to show and usable? It does work in Chrome,

Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1

2014-06-30 Thread Philip Chee
On 30/06/2014 20:08, Richard Owlett wrote: This comes under heading of unintended consequences. I just updated from SM 2.17.1 to 2.26.1. In browser: I have my preferences set to display a blank page on startup. In 2.17 that resulted in displaying a blank page *AND* an empty(blank)

Re: Google Play Store...

2014-06-30 Thread Trane Francks
On 7/1/14 5:48 AM +0900, SamuelS wrote: On 23-May-14 23:12, SamuelS wrote: Hello all, I Am having a challenge with getting the google play store to load on SM 2.26 using Win 8.0. All I receive is a blank page. Any suggestions as to what I need to consider or re-configure to get this page to

Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1

2014-06-30 Thread NoOp
On 6/30/2014 8:25 AM, David E. Ross wrote: On 6/30/2014 5:08 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: This comes under heading of unintended consequences. I just updated from SM 2.17.1 to 2.26.1. In browser: I have my preferences set to display a blank page on startup. In 2.17 that resulted in

Re: Google Play Store...

2014-06-30 Thread NFN Smith
SamuelS wrote: Okay all, This bug is back with the latest update to 2.26.1 I have tried the solution to no avail. I even went to another machine using 2.26.1 for its' settings and that did not work. Anything I might be missing here, except for gaining access to Google Play? Have you tried

Re: Google Play Store...

2014-06-30 Thread SamuelS
On 30-Jun-14 18:18, NFN Smith wrote: SamuelS wrote: Okay all, This bug is back with the latest update to 2.26.1 I have tried the solution to no avail. I even went to another machine using 2.26.1 for its' settings and that did not work. Anything I might be missing here, except for gaining

Re: Google Play Store...

2014-06-30 Thread SamuelS
On 30-Jun-14 17:45, Trane Francks wrote: On 7/1/14 5:48 AM +0900, SamuelS wrote: On 23-May-14 23:12, SamuelS wrote: Hello all, I Am having a challenge with getting the google play store to load on SM 2.26 using Win 8.0. All I receive is a blank page. Any suggestions as to what I need to

Re: Google Play Store...

2014-06-30 Thread WaltS48
On 06/30/2014 06:51 PM, SamuelS wrote: On 30-Jun-14 18:18, NFN Smith wrote: SamuelS wrote: Okay all, This bug is back with the latest update to 2.26.1 I have tried the solution to no avail. I even went to another machine using 2.26.1 for its' settings and that did not work. Anything I might

Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1

2014-06-30 Thread NoOp
On 6/30/2014 3:00 PM, NoOp wrote: ... Ironically, if I do the same in Firefox 30.0 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:30.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/30.0 , I am redirected to www.inert.com: You have been forwarded to www.inert.com. If you came

Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1

2014-06-30 Thread Hartmut Figge
NoOp: My point was/is that entering arbitrary 'searches' in the URL address bar is, IMO a security issue overall. That's probably why I've managed to disable it in SeaMonkey... now I just have to remember how (the CRS is getting worse lately). No search is performed on my SM. I do not like that.

Re: Google Play Store...

2014-06-30 Thread SamuelS
On 30-Jun-14 19:07, WaltS48 wrote: On 06/30/2014 06:51 PM, SamuelS wrote: On 30-Jun-14 18:18, NFN Smith wrote: SamuelS wrote: Okay all, This bug is back with the latest update to 2.26.1 I have tried the solution to no avail. I even went to another machine using 2.26.1 for its' settings and

Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1

2014-06-30 Thread NoOp
On 6/30/2014 4:24 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: NoOp: My point was/is that entering arbitrary 'searches' in the URL address bar is, IMO a security issue overall. That's probably why I've managed to disable it in SeaMonkey... now I just have to remember how (the CRS is getting worse lately). No

Re: Google Play Store...

2014-06-30 Thread Trane Francks
On 7/1/14 7:50 AM +0900, SamuelS wrote: On 30-Jun-14 17:45, Trane Francks wrote: On 7/1/14 5:48 AM +0900, SamuelS wrote: On 23-May-14 23:12, SamuelS wrote: Hello all, I Am having a challenge with getting the google play store to load on SM 2.26 using Win 8.0. All I receive is a blank page.

Re: Google Play Store...

2014-06-30 Thread NFN Smith
SamuelS wrote: Thank you, that worked, which means it is an add-on which is preventing the display. Maybe it is AdBlock do you think? Extensions are the most likely, although there can be other odd settings in the profile that can be disruptive (for which Safe Mode can also clear). AdBlock

Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1

2014-06-30 Thread Richard Owlett
EE wrote: Richard Owlett wrote: This comes under heading of unintended consequences. I just updated from SM 2.17.1 to 2.26.1. In browser: I have my preferences set to display a blank page on startup. In 2.17 that resulted in displaying a blank page *AND* an empty(blank) address bar. With

Re: Visual annoyances after updating to SM 2.26.1

2014-06-30 Thread Hartmut Figge
Richard Owlett: EE wrote: Does that happen with themes other than the default classic one? I don't know. [...] Richard, there is now enough information in the thread for a solution of the issue with 'light text'. Enough information that you can help yourself if you care. That seems not to be