Re: [freenet-support] Question

Czery Swizier writes: > Anyone can store anything onto the network. > You do not know what is stored on your particular node since the data is > encrypted and distributed. And just as important: Files are encrypted and then split into small chunks of 32KiB. These chunks cannot be decrypted by

Re: [freenet-support] Question

Anyone can store anything onto the network. You do not know what is stored on your particular node since the data is encrypted and distributed. The entire goal of freenet is to provide storage such that - you don't know who inserted files - you don't know where the files are kept - if you access

Re: [freenet-support] Question regarding legal case

The files where uploaded to a temporary filehost, they should still be available on Freenet. Seems the pastie.org is still working for me. Bryce: > >>These two files may be of assistance [0][1], and I believe the developer >>volunteer by the name of ArneBab on FMS has posted a correction to the

Re: [freenet-support] Question regarding legal case

>These two files may be of assistance [0][1], and I believe the developer >volunteer by the name of ArneBab on FMS has posted a correction to the >math used by LEA in regards to their black ice project [2]. Maybe try >contacting them. > >[0] Clearnet

Re: [freenet-support] Question regarding legal case

Hayley Rosenblum: > Hello, > I am a law intern at Rosenblum, Schwartz, Rogers, & Glass, P.C. in St. > Louis, MO. As a criminal defense firm, we have recently been hired for a > Possession of Child Pornography case. According to the police report , a > special investigator began running copies of

Re: [freenet-support] Question regarding legal case

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016, at 03:03 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote: > > Now addressing others on the list: I note an ethical dilemma here. It > may well be that the accused is guilty of the things they are accused > of, and invalidating this presumably-mistaken search warrant would > allow them to go

Re: [freenet-support] Question regarding legal case

Op 25 jul. 2016 22:03 schreef "Steve Dougherty" : > Now addressing others on the list: I note an ethical dilemma here. It may well be that the accused is guilty of the things they are accused of, and invalidating this presumably-mistaken search warrant would allow them to go

Re: [freenet-support] Question regarding legal case

Hi Hayley, To make sure it's clear, this is a publicly visible mailing list. I assume you've seen the news post about flawed surveillance techniques? https://freenetproject.org/news.html#20160526-htl18attack It goes over our understanding of attacks used by law enforcement and why they appear to

Re: [freenet-support] Question about handling churn in FreeNet

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Nawfal Abbassi Saber wrote: > Hi FreeNet, > > I'm doing a research about peer to peer file storage systems and i would > like to know if the system FreeNet has some mechanisms to deal with churn. > Short answer: yes, Freenet has

Re: [freenet-support] Question about freenet DHT

On Thursday 10 Feb 2011 12:42:25 Volodya wrote: On 02/10/2011 01:19 PM, Thomas Anderson wrote: I am very new to freenet. I read wiki[1] and some doc saying that freenet implements dht protocol. I am going to learn something about dht based on freenet, so I have a few questions. 1st,

Re: [freenet-support] Question about freenet DHT

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/10/2011 01:19 PM, Thomas Anderson wrote: I am very new to freenet. I read wiki[1] and some doc saying that freenet implements dht protocol. I am going to learn something about dht based on freenet, so I have a few questions. 1st, is it

Re: [freenet-support] Question About Anonymity

I hope this is the right forum to do this on but I'm trying to see what freenet offers in the way of privacy/anonymity. I've been exploring Tor for sometime which seems to have an incredible system of security via the circuit. The only 2 vulnerabilities that I see being: bad exit nodes

Re: [freenet-support] Question.7

On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 05:48:37PM -0400, Juiceman wrote: Wasn't there an idea to have a separate encrypted user store with a key that is only in ram? When a person turns off their node or computer the user store is essentially unreadable and would be erased on next start-up? Locally

Re: [freenet-support] Question.7

No, but it might not cache it in the first place if it's the result of a local request. This is to beat the Register attack. Unfortunately it means that you are highly vulnerable to your immediate neighbours. It is possible to increase the effort needed to break your anonymity somewhat at the cost

Re: [freenet-support] Question.7

Matthew Toseland wrote: No, but it might not cache it in the first place if it's the result of a local request. This is to beat the Register attack. Unfortunately it means that you are highly vulnerable to your immediate neighbours. It is possible to increase the effort needed to break your

Re: [freenet-support] Question.7

That's not the point. We already intend to make HTL=0 attacks infeasible, and they go well beyond datastore probing (think social engineering with NIM forms, Frost posts; put a different KSK/SSK on each node). The point is, you can still time it, and there's no real way to beat timing attacks in

Re: [freenet-support] Question.7

On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 10:39:33PM +0100, Volodya Mozhenkov wrote: Matthew Toseland wrote: That's not the point. We already intend to make HTL=0 attacks infeasible, and they go well beyond datastore probing (think social engineering with NIM forms, Frost posts; put a different KSK/SSK on each

Re: [freenet-support] Question.7

Wasn't there an idea to have a separate encrypted user store with a key that is only in ram? When a person turns off their node or computer the user store is essentially unreadable and would be erased on next start-up? Locally requested content would only be kept there. On 9/22/05, Matthew

Re: [freenet-support] Question.7

On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 05:48:37PM -0400, Juiceman wrote: Wasn't there an idea to have a separate encrypted user store with a key that is only in ram? When a person turns off their node or computer the user store is essentially unreadable and would be erased on next start-up? Locally

Re: [freenet-support] Question about the bunny app

The answer would be no, as far as I can tell. Supposedly there was going to be another line added into the flaunch.ini that would let you send parameters to java to startup Freenet with, however there does not seem to be any at this time. The current workaround is: 1. Start Freenet directly

RE: [freenet-support] Question re: accessing my Freenet node fromanother computer

I had no trouble getting the firewall to do the appropriate port forwarding to the server. Here's the problem. When I sit at my Linux server, fire up Mozilla, and go to http://127.0.0.1:/ or http://192.168.1.10:/ Freenet works just fine. When I sit at my laptop and try

Re: [freenet-support] Question on IPNetRouter for Macintosh

Toad wrote: On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:45:27PM +0100, Jan wrote: [...] Guess I need to leave Freenet running in hope of better times. When there will be a Mac OS9 version, perhaps. Technically you can run it on OS/9... you need a 1.4 JDK, and a command line, though. I don't have a mac

Re: [freenet-support] Question on IPNetRouter for Macintosh

On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:45:27PM +0100, Jan wrote: Hi, Just checking if I filled out the Port Mapping right. I have Freenet running on a win98 PC behind the IPNR router/firewall. Yeah, I know 98 isn't recommended, w98, w2k and xp just don't play well together on this box. In the

Re: [freenet-support] Question

On Thursday 06 November 2003 01:39 am, Kyle Weigel wrote: | I run a server, and I donate space to freenet and all that fun stuff, | but I was wondering if I could post something on MY donated space.. and | I know it's there, but give the link to people just like I would link to | anything else

Re: [freenet-support] Question

Kyle Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I run a server, and I donate space to freenet and all that fun stuff, but I was wondering if I could post something on MY donated space.. and I know it's there, but give the link to people just like I would link to anything else on Freenet. I know one

Re: [freenet-support] Question

Aconfig item that is commented out will be set to a default. That item defaults to NGR. Dave - Original Message - From: John To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 10:24 PM Subject: [freenet-support] Question In the NGR installation

Re: [freenet-support] Question 2

The seednodes file is only needed when you start freenet the first time. After that it will load the nodes that it has learned. You'll only need it again if your routingtables become corrupted. Dave - Original Message - From: John [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday,

RE: [freenet-support] question

FreenetJview.zip is a package with the setup files set to work with microsoft version of Java. The interface has been translated into Chinese. It can run off a floppy. It can be downloaded from http://freenet-china.org/freenet/download -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]