At 04:16 09/10/2011, dave.mal...@york.ac.uk wrote:
Does anyone know, of the top of their heads, if a film set type
clapper board reliably provides a positive going leading edge to
it's impulse? I can't see it not, but I'd prefer that to be
confirmed by repeatable experiments.
It surely has
At 21:29 04/12/2011, Hector Centeno wrote:
Here is an example recording I made:
http://soundcloud.com/hcenteno/kids-running-in-the-wychwood-barns
Thanks! It sounds good to me played on earbuds...
David
___
Sursound mailing list
Was there also a patent for a ribbon mic in the UK, perhaps even
earlier? (Blumlein?)
David
At 05:29 21/12/2011, dave.mal...@york.ac.uk wrote:
I think I've answered my own question - here's Harry F. Olson's
patent for the ribbon mic
http://www.google.com/patents/US1885001
from March 31st
At 07:28 15/02/2012, Paul Hodges wrote:
When I was there (around 1970) there would be separate teams at the
Proms from Radio and TV (not so often at that time), and sometimes a
third from BBC Enterprises for sale abroad. Three separate balancing
facilities in different places for the same
At 17:32 27/03/2012, Augustine Leudar wrote:
actually I was considering the RME HDSPe RayDAT which is actually the
same price as the lightpipe but I would have to use a desktop and I want
to use a fast laptop with a ssd drive (thus the need for firewire)
Firewire is on the way out. Few
At 05:30 31/03/2012, Eero Aro wrote:
The Soundfield microphone didn't attract sound engineers
because it was so expensive.
In my experience, early models were also very fussy regarding output
levels: either noisy or distorted. The expense kicks in when
professionally one needs more than
At 14:04 31/03/2012, Eero Aro wrote:
David Pickett wrote:
In my experience, early models were also very fussy regarding output
levels: either noisy or distorted.
As is common in Sursound, we are drifting out from the thread subject
Not really drifting: this is a very good reason why the SF
At 14:33 31/03/2012, Paul Hodges wrote:
--On 31 March 2012 12:53 -0400 newme...@aol.com wrote:
Music of the ordinary sort is in front . . .
Yes it is! Which is why Ambisonics makes *no* sense for the FRONT in a
musical reproduction system.
Music of the ordinary sort being the music
/03/2012, Eero Aro wrote:
David Pickett wrote:
One of the most exciting recordings I have is the Tallis
Scholars' later version of the Allegri Miserere
Here is another great performance and recording:
2L29SACD Ensemble 96 IMMORTAL NYSTEDT
http://www.2l.no/
Amazing! Not Ambisonics, not SFM
I have tried playing three channels over two speakers. I used
Gerzon's equations, with inverted crosstalk -- does one need anything
more sophisticated? I achieved this in Totalmix with my RME
FF800. It sounds good, but the L/R speakers need to be on 90 degree
axes, which implies a large
At 18:28 01/04/2012, Neil Waterman wrote:
I agree totally with Robert here.
Most of my work mates have 5.1 set-ups at home, but would never be
bothered to have anything that required more thought, so bring on
the 5.1 mixes of ambisonic source material and at least let the
masses get a
At 10:34 02/04/2012, Robert Greene wrote:
It may be old but it is still all but universal
in acoustic concert music.
I think it is disingenuous to say that it is not.
How many symphony concerts have you been to
recently where the orchestra surrounded the audience.
The other way around, sure.
But
At 11:33 02/04/2012, Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
On 2 Apr 2012, at 17:57, Eero Aro eero@dlc.fi wrote:
Because Nimbus Records devoted themselves strictly to one point
miking, they didn't record any operas, as the singers, choir and the
orchestra are scattered in a large area and you cannot
At 08:49 03/04/2012, Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
Frankly, I have ZERO interest in 2nd and higher-order Ambisonics,
because anything beyond a 5.1/4.0 setup is impractical in any home
listening environment for 90%+ of consumers, particularly if the
speakers and amps are supposed to be of a quality
At 14:01 02/04/2012, Aaron Heller wrote:
I put some files at
http://ambisonics.dreamhosters.com/DTS/
I downloaded, cut onto CD and listened to the finale of Brahms I,
which I have conducted several times (where was this recorded?). It
is the first time I have heard 4.0 from a CD and for
, and the Brahms after further tweaking
by Richard Lee and Eric Benjamin.
Thanks
Aaron
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:12 PM, David Pickett d...@fugato.com wrote:
At 14:01 02/04/2012, Aaron Heller wrote:
I put some files at
http://ambisonics.dreamhosters.com/DTS/
I downloaded, cut onto CD
At 00:43 05/04/2012, Dave Malham wrote:
On 5 April 2012 02:22, David Pickett d...@fugato.com wrote:
My normal method of playing first order is to load B format WXY .wav files
into Samplitude, matrix them and add shelf filters, but I have not yet
successfully discovered how to convert
At 22:10 10/04/2012, Robert Greene wrote:
One thing that crosses my mind is this:
and a lot more...
I dont often agree with Robert, but I agree with him entirely in this posting.
Second, in the exploration of why Ambisonics did not
succeed commercially(yet), it seems to me important
At 02:37 13/04/2012, Paul Hodges wrote:
Actually, I'd be interested to know how many people on this list
listen to surround recordings on a surround system for simple
pleasure, as opposed to in the lab or as part of specific
investigations of the process.
I try to do this; but it is not
At 19:14 14/04/2012, JEFF SILBERMAN wrote:
I'm thinking that the 99% own flatscreens by now.
Is that really so? My tv wont die. I dont use it for anything than
videos, but I see no need to replace it simply because it takes up a
lot of space.
David
At 10:22 15/04/2012, Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
On 15 Apr 2012, at 15:57, David Pickett d...@fugato.com wrote:
At 19:14 14/04/2012, JEFF SILBERMAN wrote:
I'm thinking that the 99% own flatscreens by now.
Is that really so? My tv wont die. I dont use it for anything than
videos, but I see
At 10:22 15/04/2012, Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
On 15 Apr 2012, at 15:57, David Pickett d...@fugato.com wrote:
At 19:14 14/04/2012, JEFF SILBERMAN wrote:
I'm thinking that the 99% own flatscreens by now.
Is that really so? My tv wont die. I dont use it for anything than
videos, but I see
At 19:44 15/04/2012, Len Moskowitz wrote:
A lot of stuff, with which I agree, plus:
Ronald Antony talked about the cost of good speakers being a
barrier: ... and anything halfway acceptable is on a good sale at
least $250/speaker.
This has changed in the last ten years. Good speakers today
At 21:48 18/04/2012, Robert Greene wrote:
It is interesting how this more or less obvious point-
that localizing discrete sources and localizing all the(often multiple(
reflections that make up the whole spatial impression would be
one supposes related--has escapted the popular press
At 11:09 19/04/2012, lenmoskow...@optonline.net wrote:
David Picket wrote:
This gives the lie to those who believe in putting the microphones
where it sounds
best to their ears -- in my opinion, a recipe for disaster if ever
there was one.
It's a perfectly correct approach for binaural
At 11:49 02/06/2012, Dave Malham wrote:
Okay, understood. In the course of thinking about this, I've come to
the idea that maybe the problem is with the whole concept of spreading
like this. When we localise a sound source, there's a lot of
information in the transients, which will, of course,
Omitting the SQ matrixing, and using it for 4.0, has anyone here
experience of the Ghent System that was invented by Ben Bauer et al
in the 70s? It was written up with equations for getting from what
we now call WXY in JAES Jan/Feb 1978, VOl.26, No.1/2, wherein there
is mention of recordings
At 15:53 07/10/2012, John Leonard wrote:
I'm strictly non-Facebook and I'm afraid I'm not going to change my
views, even for Ambisonics.
I am with you, John, and the others that have agreed.
David
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
At 22:19 08/10/2012, Robert Greene wrote:
it is quite true that the search engines, for all their
remarkable power, do not promote in -depth study of things
or issues. Too much piffle comes up too easily--if commercial
interests are invovled
I have also found this to be a problem and use, eg,
In the USA it is usually even higher!
At 12:10 24/10/2012, Eero Aro wrote:
Hi
The site says that an average conversation runs at about 30 decibels
I wonder where in the world? Compared to what? A decibel is a ratio.
Normal discussion usually at around 45-50 dB(A).
Journalists...
Eero
Read also the comments...
david
At 15:50 10-11-12, Andrew Castiglione wrote:
Hi!
For the 'Geeks' among us.
http://hackaday.com/2012/11/10/upgrading-a-voice-recorder-with-a-hex-editor/
The solution to improving the bitrate for the TEAC VR-20 was as simple as
copying the first 20 bytes from
At 08:46 24-11-12, Eric Carmichel wrote:
Back in October (Sursound Digest, Vol 51, Issue 24, to be exact) there
was a post regarding places to visit, and Orfield Labs, the quietest
place on Earth was showcased. It was then pointed out that the BBC
article (link below) said, an average
I must have missed the beginning of this.
What does WFS stand for? W... Field System?
David
At 06:10 12-12-12, Augustine Leudar wrote:
Ok lets have a proximity off !
One of the things that interests me most in the work Im doing is creating
proximity illusions. One member of this board asked my
At 11:54 08-01-13, Tim Collins wrote:
You can make a velocity microphone by subtracting two closely spaced omnis.
I seem to recall that Blumlein did this and also found that the s-n
ratio was poor.
David
___
Sursound mailing list
At 04:50 04-03-13, Harry Saunders wrote:
SPAM removed
Can the list owner please do something to remove this person, who has
poasted four SPAM messages, three in the past week?
David
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
know
On 4 March 2013 14:24, David Pickett d...@fugato.com wrote:
At 04:50 04-03-13, Harry Saunders wrote:
SPAM removed
Can the list owner please do something to remove this person, who has
poasted four SPAM messages, three in the past week?
David
At 12:53 14-04-13, Martin Leese wrote:
It wasn't just hi-fi; male hobbies tended to pass
in waves. This could be seen in the hobbyist
magazines popular in the UK. Prior to hi-fi it
was photography, with magazines such as
Amateur Photographer. This died away, and
the next wave was hi-fi, with
At 11:24 20-04-13, Eric Carmichel wrote:
Just received an email which - seems someone else is reinventing the
Soundfield again - see http://www.quaud.io/
This time it's based on mems microphones and is very small so it ends
up using blind source separation in order to get good
source-interference
At 15:27 20-04-13, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
If one regards the subcardioid as made up of omni and figure of
eight components, is it not the case that the ambisonic XYZ signals
of the Soundfield Mic are derived solely from the figure of eight components?
Not quite, because at high frequencies the
At 18:29 21-04-13, Michael Dunn wrote:
I just discovered Burn (free), which purports to supports DVD-A
burning! Woo. Anyone have experience with this, or other, free DVD-A
burning SW?
Not free, but a steal at the low price they are asking is Cirlinca's
software. It does gap-free recording.
At 18:28 25-04-13, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
At middle C, 440Hz, you're down to under 20 centimetres. At 1kHz
which is about at the center of our most acute hearing, it's only
8-9 centimetres.
Just for the record 440Hz is nearer to the A above middle C, and the
centre of our most acute hearing
At 15:29 25-04-13, Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
Given the subject of mics:
Has anyone experience with this here:
http://www.nevatonmics.com/pdf/Nevaton_Flyer_centerfold_v2.pdf
Their mics are expensive, though they look nice on the outside and
the electronics appear to be good; but the
At 20:35 25-04-13, Robert Greene wrote:
Not nearer--exactly! 440 A is the standard pitch in the Western world,
though orchestra often shade this up a bit. Middle C is around 261.6 Hz
I wrote that tongue in cheek... Most orchestras in Europe are
considerably sharper and sound to my ears
At 05:30 26-04-13, Chris Pike wrote:
The programme contains an excellent array of speakers from the
broadcasting industry and academia, with panel discussions and many
demonstrations.
an array of speakers... An ambiguous collective noun in the context!
David
At 04:50 26-04-13, Richard Dobson wrote:
I am not clear just what the issue is here.
The issue is that if one is going to be precise about the Physics and
Maths discussed here, one should preferably extend that precision to
musical considerations.
...there is nothing otherwise special
At 14:30 26-04-13, Paul Hodges wrote:
--On 26 April 2013 14:12 -0500 David Pickett d...@fugato.com wrote:
Yes, but mostly the bottom note is an A, with only once a G. And when
you get to the important fortissimo top Es and Fs, do you leave them to
the Tenors?
Eh, what do you sing?
I can
In Firefox, you just need to hit file/save page as to download.
David
At 09:53 29-04-13, Jon Honeyball wrote:
Could you zip it? Would make it easier to download here, otherwise it
tries to play in web browser. Or I am being very dim today (which is
entirely possible!)
Thanks
jon
On
At 10:59 29-04-13, Dave Malham wrote:
A few months ago I had to sort out a PCM701 with one of my spdif cards in
(the ones I used to do for Audio Design). We went through three PCM units
before we found one that worked fully in replay mode (the original, one
from the Uni and the final one, off
At 11:34 29-04-13, Dave Malham wrote:
It is possible but I wasn't at all sure that it wasn't the ceramic
resonator used in the oscillator.
What mechanism causes deterioration in one of these?
David
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
At 12:37 29-04-13, Kees de Visser wrote:
Great idea though (same for a software Dolby A/SR decoder, which isn't
avaialble AFAIK).
A standalone Windows app that would decode Dolby-A encoded wavefiles
and output a restored non-Dolby 24-bit wavefile would be most
useful. I have several
At 16:02 01-05-13, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
The difficult part in writing any software emulation of the Dolby-A
or similar systems is modelling the dynamic behaviour of the compander,
not the actual audio processing. Such systems will have 'designed' and
documented attack/release times, but analog
At 16:47 01-05-13, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
On 2013-05-01, David Pickett wrote:
So, analog still rules!
Please die horribly. ;)
You say that, but I have recently been transferring old cassettes to
hard drive and, given that they have a limited bandwidth of about
15kHz, the noise
At 17:59 01-05-13, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
On 2013-05-01, David Pickett wrote:
You say that, but I have recently been transferring old cassettes to
hard drive and, given that they have a limited bandwidth of about
15kHz, the noise is not intrusive and I have been amazed at the
quality
At 00:50 18-05-13, Robert Greene wrote:
Of course in those live versus canned experiments(also with AR)
reverberation tended to make things sound pretty much the same
to smooth out errors and so on.
Reverberation in the RFH pre 1966?
David
___
At 12:16 21-05-13, Robert Greene wrote:
Even dead concert halls in the relative sense
have a lot of reverberation. A really dead hall
still has a 1 second reverberation time say
and most of what you hear in the audience is still
reverberant sound.
Did you ever hear an orchestra playing in the
At 02:03 28/5/2013, Dave Malham wrote:
On 15ips tape - yes, this is fairly limited in one way, that 20 k or less
was often the cut-off frequency, that was the 3dB point, but the roll off
was very slow, often only 6dB per Octave at first until near the first
extinction point caused by the head
At 09:54 1/6/2013, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
BTW, did you ever look through what Z really does to you *encoding*
equations? Formally, in order to arrive at proper pantophony you
always have to either reject Z fully or purposely subtract it from
the whole B-format signal set. Otherwise, even
At 19:55 1/6/2013, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
On 2013-06-01, David Pickett wrote:
What I take this to mean is that if one is using WXY (derived from
A-format) for horizontal only playback, W will contain unwanted
vertical information that should be discarded.
Correct for W, but also for X and Y
At 11:23 2/6/2013, Michael Chapman wrote:
At 19:55 1/6/2013, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
On 2013-06-01, David Pickett wrote:
What I take this to mean is that if one is using WXY (derived from
A-format) for horizontal only playback, W will contain unwanted
vertical information that should be discarded
At 16:13 23/6/2013, Martin Leese wrote:
Others have mentioned Trifield. The definitive
paper for this is:
M.A. Gerzon, Optimum Reproduction Matrices
for Multispeaker Stereo, J. Audio Engineering
Society, vol. 40 no. 7/8, pp. 571-589
(1992 July/Aug.)
There are two complementary papers on this
At 06:34 28/6/2013, Eric Carmichel wrote:
The technique assumes that the live source is *stereo* too; that is, a
stage ahead of the mics with musicians aligned in rows that have L-R
orientations.
Actually, if you think about it, the Blumlein technique assumes that
the musicians are arranged in
At 19:02 26/6/2013, Eric Carmichel wrote:
I have a friend who's an advocate of the Decca Tree mic arrangement.
Many of his recordings (a lot of choir and guitar) sound quite nice,
Decca Trees sound nice on choirs because they do not have precise
stereo imaging and thus one cannot hear
At 06:31 3/7/2013, Robert Greene wrote:
Variations from reality ought surely to be based on knowing
how to reproduce the reality first and then introducing the
variations. One does not bend pitches for artistic effect
until one is able to play in tune, so to speak.
Yes, indeed; but such
At 02:02 7/8/2013, =?gb18030?B?wdikzg==?= wrote:
Hi there,
There are an 5.1 monitor room needed to be build and the angle has
been settled as (+-30, 0,
+-120degrees). I've searched some references and some of them suggests
for movie should be (+-25,0,+-110degrees), some said the typical 5.1
At 15:47 25-09-13, Alessandro Fogar wrote:
I'k like to monitor some work of mine realized mainly using ATK and Sc3
i.e. first order ambisonics.
Could you plase suggest me some very small and inexpensive speakers ?
How about two pairs of these:
At 18:20 09-11-13, Alvin Foster wrote:
Can anyone provide a link to an Ambisonics B-format wave file that pin
points at least 6-locations or speakers in the movie 5.1 listening space? I
would like: Left-Right-Left Side-Right Side, Center, LFE. The suggested
locations are actually for movie 5.1
At 12:31 14-11-13, Bo-Erik Sandholm wrote:
I think I rememeber it is horizontal only and using xy cardeoids and
syntesising the omni signal by taking the singals and adding with
phase inverign for 2 signals.
If I understand you correctly, you are suggesting that hoizontal
ambisonic (alias
At 10:03 16-11-13, Paul Hodges wrote:
--On 16 November 2013 06:31 + Michael Chapman s...@mchapman.com
wrote:
--fiddling to get the correct one of (?)24 possible permutations of
the four capsules to the snake is a ! Especially in dim lighting
... and you didn't bring a lamp ... and
WOW! All this in three hours!
David
At 06:35 21-11-13, Navid Navab wrote:
A spatial audio workshop on Friday, Nov. 22nd from 4 - 7pm.
Location: MB 8.245, Concordia University (1450 Guy St, Montréal, QC)
Poster
Dear Robin,
More wanking, this time in Quebec!
What the f..k is an alkemist -- see end?
And they are going to cover all this in 3 hours...
Cheers,
David
A spatial audio workshop on Friday, Nov. 22nd from 4 - 7pm.
Location: MB 8.245, Concordia University (1450 Guy St, Montréal, QC)
At 18:12 22-11-13, Richard Furse wrote:
Yes - there basically aren't any problems applying the processing operations
to material that is only first order. Feeding first order material to a
third order decoder raises more subtle issues.
I have obviously missed something. How does one record in
At 12:31 04-12-13, Michael Chapman wrote:
I would say ambisonics is a 'dictionary word' (though I haven't looked
in any dictionaries).
Whatever, it has been in use a long time and unprotected.
It doesnt hurt to ask, since it can be shown that the word has had
specific useage for a long time.
Dave,
Your link gives a quai-404 message: Die aufgerufene Seite existiert
nicht. Entweder ist ihr Link fehlerhaft oder die Seite wurde verschoben.
Were you referring to this?
http://www.tonmeister.de/index.php?p=tonmeistertagung/2014
David
At 08:29 16-01-14, Dave Malham wrote:
This
Asctually, I think Francis Rumsey's keynote
speech looks interesting, and I would be
interested to read members' comments on the abstryt below.
David
Spatial audio reconstructing reality or creating illusion? (Talk)
The history of spatial audio is essentially one
about the dichotomy
Dear Robin,
I am sure you are right about Bennett: you go
back a long way with Scarecrow and I am just
jaundiced about US publishers (e.g. OUP!)
Got this in my inbox. mechatronics and digital
fabrication??? Brave New World that I am glad not to be a part of...
With all those
At 23:43 05-03-14, Aaron Heller wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:52 PM, David Pickett d...@fugato.com wrote:
At 21:06 05-03-14, Dave Hunt wrote:
1. 4 D sound (!) (Dave Malham)
2. Re: 4 D sound (!) (Ronald C.F. Antony)
3. Re: 4 D sound (!) (Dave Malham)
4. Re: 4 D sound
I just stumbled on this:
http://rdmedia.bbc.co.uk/radio3/faq.html
I have an appropriate soundcard; but am not sure I want to install
Google Chrome... (Bummer that it doesnt work on Firefox!)
has anyone
David
___
Sursound mailing list
At 18:55 16-03-14, Augustine Leudar wrote:
Good find ! Chrome isn't so bad actually - I use it firefox and opera -
chrome is by far the fastest to load and less memory hungry than
firefox though I too prefer firefox
Ok, if I take a chance oin Chrome not taking over my machine, then
the
At 19:30 16-03-14, Augustine Leudar wrote:
right mouse button over volume control in bottom right hand corner
playack devices click RME set default restart browser/applet
On that panel each of the pairs of RME output is presented
separately... (I'll look for the documentation on the
Having tried earlier to get this to work -- unsuccessfully because I
was messing with the Realtek HD Audio Manager which turend out to be
irrelevant -- I decided to have another go at fooled around with my
PC and, as is often the case, it suddenly started doing what I wanted
(perseverance is
At 21:07 17-03-14, Augustine Leudar wrote:
I installed Chrome (having previously set a System Restore Point),
You are such a drama queen :) I'm glad you got it working though - Ill have
to try this out
No. I have learned not to trust dwnloaded software, after some bad
experiences! :-)
A
At 23:03 17-03-14, mgra...@mstvp.com wrote:
Weren't the first digital recorders actually adapted helical scan video
ones? Because, I mean, those things are line accurate by necessity, so
that once you have them time coded, you ought to be able to get sample
accurate registration of the
Pace Paul, by the time it got to the third movement of the Dvorak, I
was quite impressed. The Festival Hall is not over-endowed with
ambiance, but when I turned the back up a bit, what I heard was akin
to what I often hear in a concert hall when not too close to the
stage, as opposed to when
At 02:47 18-03-14, Marc Lavallée wrote:
Are the 4 channels streams available after the concert?
It seems that they are realtime only.
David
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
For the next week or two, BBC Radio 3 is broadcasting the evening
concerts live from the South Bank's Pull out all the Stops
festival, and as far as I can make out, the intention is to stream
all of these in 4.0, using HTML5 with AAC-LC codec at 320kb/s. The
concerts all begin at 19:30 GMT
At 12:48 18-03-14, Paul Hodges wrote:
Do we know the sample rate of the transmissions? I just tested
four-channel recording with the audio interface (and AudioMulch) set to
44.1k (as they happened to be), which worked - but if the sample rate
is actually 48k then the Windows SRC will have been
BBC server went down several times this evening. But the rebuilt RFH
organ sounded much improved, and from time to time I could imagine I was there.
Orchestra and piano tomorrow evening.
David
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
I have a question about putting surround on the Internet.
Apart from needing the right browser to hear anything, if one uses
WAV files, no problem (apparently); but if one is using FLAC or OGG
it seems to me that there are potential level and phase problems
unless the channels are all
At 23:33 18-03-14, Paul Hodges wrote:
--On 18 March 2014 23:18 +0100 David Pickett d...@fugato.com wrote:
BBC server went down several times this evening.
What I don't understand is why things like that go down so easily; it
may be hard to get a computer system running, but if it's done even
Mar 2014, at 07:33, David Pickett wrote:
I suspect that most of the problems last night were at the originating
end, though there were cases when there were beats missing as the stream
caught up, which seemed more likely to be delays in the Internet.
from the BBC blog:
21. Rupert Brun, 18TH
to it, and no errors
were reported by the software.
But I am guessing...
David
--On 19 March 2014 18:47 +0100 David Pickett d...@fugato.com wrote:
A bit scary that, as Paul said, Microsoft employ SRC automatically if
you get it wrong...
Actually, after thinking about this, I suspect it's
According to Rupert Brun, Head of Technology for BBC Radio, the rate
used for the 4.0 streaming frm the South Bank was 48kHz.
What I dont like is that one can record the stream at 44.1kHz and the
sample rate conversion appears to be dont in Windows. Is there a
means of actually showing the
At 21:06 08-04-14, David Pickett wrote:
http://www.stereophile.com/content/upward-mobility-2-channels-surr
ound-page-2
There are also ways of Matrixing LR stereo to LCR described by
Gerzon in Hierarchical Transmission System for Multispeaker
Stereo, JAES, Vol.40, No.9, Sep 1992 (and another
This well-known website gives details of the ÖRF Surround tests:
http://www.hauptmikrofon.de/index.php?option=com_contentview=articleid=68:orf-surround-techniques-comparisoncatid=29:stereoItemid=58
I downloaded the ISO file here:
Bravo on the mic!
I have played your file (as my set up is restricted to 4.0 horizontal
mode, I have only matrixed channels W, X Y). I find it difficult
to know at what level to set the W channel, as what appears to be
going on all around is (excuse me, no offence intended!) rather
Does anybody know why I am receiving (only from
this list and not from any other listservers)
postings without any line-breaks? I find them impossible to read.
An example is below, although it may well have
truncations that impose linebreaks by the time it
is redistributed, which will make
I am on Window$ 7. Using Eudora for email. The problem is not in
evidence with every posting, but it has been much worse recently.
David
At 11:39 13-05-14, Michael Chapman wrote:
Does anybody know why I am receiving (only from
this list and not from any other listservers)
postings without
What does one need to decode this?
David
At 16:44 03-06-14, Bruce Wiggins wrote:
A live binaural audio/video stream of the event (7.30 BST [GMT + 1]
Saturday 7th June) will be available at the following page:
http://sigma7rosetta.co.uk/
cheers
Bruce
On 20 May 2014 10:19, Eero Aro
So no surround streaming? Just two-channels? 4.0 would be nice... (!)
David
At 17:36 03-06-14, Eero Aro wrote:
David Pickett wrote:
What does one need to decode this?
To decode binaural?
Cans, two ears.
Eero
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound
Dear Granville,
I hear there is BBC gear for auction here, though I cant find much of interest:
http://www.ppauctions.com/_assets/auctions/115/flysheet/Flysheet.pdf
Cheers,
David
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
1 - 100 of 250 matches
Mail list logo
