: The Energy Crunch To Come
Dear Bob,
With respect to the US contribution to the European theater consider
that at Stalingrad the German losses were 300,000 and the Russian
400,000 and Stalingrad was a battle that the Russians won! At Kursk the
Germans lost 100,000 killed
,
Bob.
- Original Message -
From: Rick Littrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 5:49 AM
Subject: Re: [OFF TOPIC] Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Dear Bob,
With respect to the US contribution to the European theater consider
:49 AM
Subject: Re: [OFF TOPIC] Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Dear Bob,
With respect to the US contribution to the European theater consider
that at Stalingrad the German losses were 300,000 and the Russian
400,000 and Stalingrad was a battle that the Russians won! At Kursk
Eisenhower.
Regards,
Bob.
- Original Message -
From: Rick Littrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 5:49 AM
Subject: Re: [OFF TOPIC] Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Dear Bob,
With respect to the US contribution to the European theater
Whether or not the US took Rome or invaded in 1944 the war was lost for
Germany. They could no longer replace their losses while the Soviet
ability to put in men and material into the field was steadily rising.
The German army was essentially an army within an army. A small, highly
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [OFF TOPIC] Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Bob,
Even those numbers are sub number and does not say anything. It is
possible that my source was wrong, but do not give me number who
says nothing to that effect. If my source
The US involvement in the fighting in Europe
was not pivotal to the outcome.
Clearly any good student of history knows that US losses in Europe
during WWII were completely drawfed by those of Germany and Russian, but
to claim that US involvement in the fighting in Europe was not pivotal
The US involvement in the fighting in Europe
was not pivotal to the outcome.
Clearly any good student of history knows that US losses in Europe
during WWII were completely drawfed by those of Germany and Russian, but
to claim that US involvement in the fighting in Europe was not pivotal
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come(Finally an eye is
opening)
And whose eye might that be Klaus? Not yours, I don't think.
Keith,
You are not right by saying that he did not threaten anybody. You needed to
be there just for half a day and you would have seen
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Keith Addison
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 2:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come(Finally an eye is
opening)
And whose eye might that be Klaus? Not yours, I don't think.
Keith,
You are not right
Of Henri Naths
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 9:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Hakan,
I would like to give a humble option here,
( Hakan wrote;...Criminal, established by the fact that we now know that
Iraq were no WMD threat to US. )
We took out
Rick,
I would never want to play down the logistical support from US, it was
absolutely crucial for the outcome of WWII. Regardless the later commercial
and economical benefits for US. I will never try to play down the
importance of the Marshal plan from US, which was a more intelligent way
, and
of course the source.
Regards,
Bob.
- Original Message -
From: Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [OFF TOPIC] Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Bob,
Even those numbers are sub number and does not say anything
, 2005 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [OFF TOPIC] Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Bob,
Even those numbers are sub number and does not say anything. It is
possible that my source was wrong, but do not give me number who
says nothing to that effect. If my source is right and US losses were
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Henri Naths
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 9:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Hakan,
I would like to give a humble option here,
( Hakan wrote;...Criminal
This is great ... finally we are making sense. The WMD is not the issue.
This is what I have said all along. People miss the big picture. Suddam
Hussein was the weapon of mass destruction. 100% agreed.
KS
Only two problems with that:
a) Iraq was a sovereign nation. We do not have the right,
Sheesh
In fact I posted a reply saying it was lethal nonsense:
Sigh...
I suppose one man's sense is another man's idiocy, and to each his
own and all that, all jolly good and well... But in fact it's a
matter of what you support, what you go along with, what you accept
wihout
John, I agree with what you say, but I did NOT write that!!!
Sheesh
Oops. Very sorry Keith. I know you didn't write that. That's what I get
for hastily replying while I'm waiting for the coffee to finish brewing.
Again. Sorry about that.
jh
know.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: bmolloy
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 4/4/05 10:35 PM
Subject: Re: [OFF TOPIC] Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Hello Hakan,
Again with respect, it is not well known that the
Pacific losses in WW2 were greater than
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come(Finally an eye is
opening)
This is great ... finally we are making sense. The WMD is not the issue.
This is what I have said all along. People miss the big picture. Suddam
Hussein was the weapon of mass destruction. 100% agreed
John, I agree with what you say, but I did NOT write that!!!
Sheesh
Oops. Very sorry Keith. I know you didn't write that. That's what I
get for hastily replying while I'm waiting for the coffee to finish
brewing.
Again. Sorry about that.
jh
Take your emailer out and have it shot
PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Keith Addison
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 7:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come(Finally an eye is
opening)
This is great ... finally we are making sense. The WMD is not the issue.
This is what I have said all along. People miss
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Keith Addison
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 7:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come(Finally an eye is
opening)
This is great ... finally we are making sense. The WMD
Dear Hakan,
You are, of course, correct as far as the fighting in Europe. The
Soviet Union fielded some 540 divisions to the German 250+ and the US
87. By the time of the Normandy invasion Germany had lost. The
critical battles of the war were arguably Stalingrad, Kursk, Karkov, and
Hello Hakan,
(snip)
The number you give is WWII losses, I was talking about the
European part of WWII. This because we talked about taking
out Hitler. US lost several times more in the Pacific, than they
did in Europe.
With respect, the total allied losses under General
Bob,
Even those numbers are sub number and does not say anything. It is
possible that my source was wrong, but do not give me number who
says nothing to that effect. If my source is right and US losses were
10% of allies total, around 10,000 US soldiers died in the Battle of
Bulge. It is also
World War II (Common Courage Press, 1995).
- Original Message -
From: Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 March, 2005 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Bob,
You were right and I am wrong and I am glad that I did get
a very good
not perfect and it never will be... stop sniveling.
- Original Message -
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 April, 2005 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Keith,
I think it is quite irrelevant who sold what to whom,
Even
for the same reason, Him and Suddam Hussein were
weapons
of mass destruction.
H.
- Original Message -
From: Hakan Falk
To:
Sent: 31 March, 2005 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Bob,
You were right and I am wrong and I am glad that I did get
a very good
Hakan
Of course I read your posts. The misunderstanding is all yours this time my
friend, I assure you. However, the one whose English (at least as far as
writing skills go) is so bad, is clearly me.
The first paragraph of that last post was directed to you Hakan. The rest of
that post was
Hi All,
Correct me if I am wrong but I believe President Carter was the only
President to be an engineer. I recall him as having a degree in nuclear
engineering? True? He is also a great humanitarian.
Here's a quote from the World's Finest Navy site:
When Admiral Hyman G. Rickover (then
Robert,
I did not misunderstood, I earlier said that after
this election the argument of that he was not
representative for US is not valid. This is what
democracy is all about. He is elected now and
he represent USA.
Sigh. . . On this we agree.
The ones who do not agree
should
://members.aol.com/bblum6/parenti.htm
Against Empire
by Michael Parenti
Chapter 3: Intervention: Whose gain? Whose pain?
Best wishes
Keith
- Original Message - From: Keith Addison
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 April, 2005 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
I mention
to folks to go back and read Huxley and Orwell. We«re living in their world.
They just didn«t get the date right.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Henri Naths
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 1/04/05 16:37
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Keith,
I think
Sorry, but I live in Texas and your English is so much better than the
average of what I hear, that you must be a foreigner grin
Bright Blessings,
Kim
At 06:34 PM 4/1/2005, you wrote:
Thanks anyway, because I thought that my English is
so bad, that it exclude the possibility that I was
.
- Original Message -
From: Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 March, 2005 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Bob,
You were right and I am wrong and I am glad that I did get
a very good explanation on how Hubbert could be so right.
It also explains
What sealed Saddam's fate was him converting to the Euro as Iraq's Oil
Reserve Currency in November 2000. UN weapons inspectors were inside Iraq
and about to certify Iraq as WMD-Free. Since 97% of all his WMD's were
destroyed in the first weapons inspections before the inspectors were
ordered
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Bob,
You were right and I am wrong and I am glad that I did get
a very good explanation on how Hubbert could be so right.
It also explains why president Carter was so genuinely
worried, when he developed his energy plan. He had the
foresight
: The Energy Crunch To Come
Bob,
You were right and I am wrong and I am glad that I did get
a very good explanation on how Hubbert could be so right.
It also explains why president Carter was so genuinely
worried, when he developed his energy plan. He had the
foresight to realize
Hakan, you are not well informed.
World War II killed and missing
...armed forces KM... total population of country
Australia26,976.6 million
New Zealand..11,625.2 million
Canada...42,04211 million
after the end of the war.
Regards
Malcolm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 April 2005 01:31
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OFF TOPIC] Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Hakan, you are not well
I'm not too up on the history either. I do know that militqry
equipment was provided on lend-lease, which meant that if it was still
around after the war, the Brits had to give it back.
So a month or so after V-J day, the U.S. under the influence of Congress
said OK, time's up, give it back. So
Doug,
The number you give is WWII losses, I was talking about the
European part of WWII. This because we talked about taking
out Hitler. US lost several times more in the Pacific, than they
did in Europe. Otherwise I find your number interesting and I have
seen them before.
As Darryl pointed
Bob,
You were right and I am wrong and I am glad that I did get
a very good explanation on how Hubbert could be so right.
It also explains why president Carter was so genuinely
worried, when he developed his energy plan. He had the
foresight to realize that Hubbert was right.
It also explains
: Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 March, 2005 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Bob,
You were right and I am wrong and I am glad that I did get
a very good explanation on how Hubbert could be so right.
It also explains why president Carter
All of this supported by the America people, in a reelection
of president Bush. I hear the false argument that only 48%
voted him in office. This argument is poor mathematics, I
cannot get to this result, when Bush won with a more than
3 million of the populous American vote. It was the
PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Bob,
You were right and I am wrong and I am glad that I did get
a very good explanation on how Hubbert could be so right.
It also explains why president Carter was so genuinely
worried, when he developed his energy plan. He had
: robert luis rabello
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 4/1/05 12:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Hakan Falk wrote:
All of this supported by the America people, in a reelection
of president Bush. I hear the false argument that only 48%
voted him in office. This argument
War II (Common Courage Press, 1995).
- Original Message -
From: Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 March, 2005 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Bob,
You were right and I am wrong and I am glad that I did get
a very good
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 March, 2005 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Bob,
You were right and I am wrong and I am glad that I did get
a very good explanation on how Hubbert could be so right.
It also explains why president Carter was so genuinely
worried
reason, Him and Suddam Hussein were weapons
of mass destruction.
H.
- Original Message -
From: Hakan Falk
To:
Sent: 31 March, 2005 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Bob,
You were right and I am wrong and I am glad that I did get
a very good explanation
.
Sincerely and humbly,
Tom Irwin
-Original Message-
From: robert luis rabello
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 4/1/05 12:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Hakan Falk wrote:
All of this supported by the America people, in a reelection
of president Bush. I hear the false
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 April, 2005 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Henri Naths wrote:
Hakan,
I would like to give a humble option here,
( Hakan wrote;...Criminal, established by the fact that we now know that
Iraq were no WMD threat to US. )
We took out Hitler
Hakan,
I am stunned almost beyond the point of being able to write this
response. I say stunned because I think that for the first time, I
actually agree with you. I doubt it will happen too often, if ever
again, but as for this post, I can find no reason to disagree.
Like it or not, the
by Michael Parenti
Chapter 3: Intervention: Whose gain? Whose pain?
Best wishes
Keith
- Original Message - From: Keith Addison
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 April, 2005 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Henri Naths wrote:
Hakan,
I
Robert,
I did not misunderstood, I earlier said that after
this election the argument of that he was not
representative for US is not valid. This is what
democracy is all about. He is elected now and
he represent USA. The ones who do not agree
should accept and support US, at least in
theory.
Antifossil,
Of course you cannot agree with my earlier postings.
You have not even read them, because if you had done
that?
THEN YOU WOULD KNOW THAT I AM SWEDISH
AND LIVE IN SPAIN: LOL
Thanks anyway, because I thought that my English is
so bad, that it exclude the possibility that I was
Hubbert was not a petroleum geologist, he was a mathematician
and university professor in mathematics. He presented mathematical
methods to calculate the depletion of any finite resource. In the
70's directly after the 1973 crises, he got the job from the
US Parliament to calculate the
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marion_King_Hubbert
Hubbert was born in San Saba, Texas in 1903. He attended the University
of Chicago, where he received his B.S. in 1926, his M.S. in 1928, and
his Ph.D in 1937, studying geology, mathematics, and physics. He worked
as an assistant geologist
for this morning) ok that was two.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 March, 2005 2:51 PM
Subject: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
With oil prices at an all-time high and Big Oil
reporting record profits this year has been exceptional.
Am I
(in
this petro case permit their government to launch an immoral, recently
ahistorical, pre-emptive war) to get their fix.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 3/30/05 6:51 PM
Subject: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
With oil prices at an all
Bob,
I stand corrected and the only excuse I have, is that I only brought
forward a mistake that I read earlier. I remember that it was an article
about the hearings in US congress in mid 70'. Will however not do this
mistake again, but do not despair, there are many others I will do and
,
and I am closer to making biodiesel. My Prius meets my needs for now, but I
don't plan to convert it to biodiesel any time soon!
From: Henri Naths [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/03/31 Thu AM 10:45:45 EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
One comment
case permit their government to launch an
immoral, recently
ahistorical, pre-emptive war) to get their fix.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 3/30/05 6:51 PM
Subject: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
With oil prices at an all
from hearing about his work many years ago)
Hakan Falk wrote:
Bob,
I stand corrected and the only excuse I have, is that I only brought
forward a mistake that I read earlier. I remember that it was an article
about the hearings in US congress in mid 70'. Will however not do this
mistake
65 matches
Mail list logo
