[swinog] Re: How to destroy data effectively?

Hi Venti that could be done the magnetic way, a very secure way is let them spin up and expose then this way to a magnetic strenght >2 tesla, some models wil be a screeching noise heard until they come to a halt, this way not even the tracking is readable anymore ;) .. or let them spinn up

Re: [swinog] background migration of swisscom connection from IPv4 native to v6 + DS-Lite

Well i only suspecting your try to use ipsec, wich is a crazy vpn solution. I would sugest to evaluate ssl based vpn in the future which naturally do not run into nat problems. Just my five cents Em 27 de outubro de 2017 03:00:18 AMT, WolfSec-Support escreveu: >Hello, > >

Re: [swinog] Swiss ISPs and IPv6 --- 2016 edition

Maybe .. But i do not spend money nor time to do some "missionary work" for what reason ever there is when stuff doesn't work. I've done it for years with spammer friendly hoster which even see the abuse box is a Spam trap, and all the so called number one hoster which never take care about

Re: [swinog] Swiss ISPs and IPv6 --- 2016 edition

:10 AMT, Jeroen Massar <jer...@massar.ch> escreveu: >On 2016-09-20 13:00, Roger Schmid wrote: >> Just one .. Dropping MTU handling and point to layer7 should handle >that >> doesnt let you feel strange ? So how could an app handle packet size >> thru L4 ? > >

Re: [swinog] Swiss ISPs and IPv6 --- 2016 edition

to the masses as at least the mentioned flaw is a show stopper Em 20 de setembro de 2016 02:13:39 AMT, Jeroen Massar <jer...@massar.ch> escreveu: >On 2016-09-19 23:53, Roger Schmid wrote: >> |Come on folks, it is 2016! IPv6 is >> |*20 years* old... >> But still not matured en

Re: [swinog] Swiss ISPs and IPv6 --- 2016 edition

|Come on folks, it is 2016! IPv6 is |*20 years* old... But still not matured enough to put on public usage, beside of some design flaw it is in some cases even bad implemented Maybe the isp/hoster/transit provider ned some teaching how to do it the right way. Em 15 de setembro de 2016

Re: [swinog] Swiss VoIP providers

Am 28/08/2014 21:23, schrieb Michael Horn: On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 19:45:43 +0200 (CEST) Ralph Krämer ralph.krae...@vable.ch wrote: I suggest to run your own Asterisk (or Callmanager) ...or freeswitch, if you like reliability and predictable behaviour. I've managed quite a few freeswitch

Re: [swinog] 3G Repeater

Am 31/07/2014 02:28, schrieb Miguel Elias: First, any usage of active signal repeater is forbidden in Switzerland. (Statement of Bakom). Any base station system or signal repeater has to be owned / managed by an official frequency licensee. Signal repeater used in the field, do have some

Re: [swinog] 3G Repeater

Am 31/07/2014 04:36, schrieb Andreas Fink: On 31 Jul 2014, at 10:26, Roger Schmid ro...@mgz.ch wrote: Am 31/07/2014 02:28, schrieb Miguel Elias: First, any usage of active signal repeater is forbidden in Switzerland. (Statement of Bakom). Any base station system or signal repeater has

[swinog] Fwd: Re: 3G Repeater

Original-Nachricht Message-ID: 53d853bd.2000...@mgz.ch Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 22:09:01 -0400 From: Roger Schmid ro...@mgz.ch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: swinog

Re: [swinog] 3G Repeater

Am 31/07/2014 05:04, schrieb Rene Luria: i believe in his case he need an complete outdoor solution, anytone have an tendency to feedback quickly and they dont have an detektor for such cases at all. you maybe not recognize that but maybe that thing creating signals nearby which interfere

Re: [swinog] Lösung für eine SMS-Notfallalarmierung und Statuswebseite

Am 31/07/2014 09:42, schrieb Onlime Webhosting: Eine Lösung mit einem Handy und prepaid karte dürfte preislich bei dem kleinen volumen günstig sein und es funktioniert auch bei totem inet.. wenn das handy auch nicht mehr funktionieren sollte dann haben die empfänger ebenfalls ein problem.

Re: [swinog] 3G Repeater

Is anyone familiar with 3G repeater gear? I'm asking for a neighbor whose family owns a cottage in a Swiss mountain valley with poor 3G reception. well its not so easy to give you an definite advise, the signal is based on reflection i believe, that has to be resolved. you have to take into

[swinog] cisco's try of business challange

Need an medical of the future be a CCNE ? http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/switches/catalyst-2950-series-switches/datasheet-listing.html ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

Re: [swinog] Small VoIP PBX recommendations

i would recommend a out of the box solution from a company called Atcom its a complete small low power box, able to handle up to 8 simultanous calls. the box include one FXS and one FXO port. Asterisk based of course take a look on http://www.atcom.cn/products_ippbx.html they even offer good

Re: [swinog] Replacement Fan for C2950-T-24?

Am 25/06/2013 14:57, schrieb Fredy Kuenzler: Try Pusterla at Hohlstrasse. They used to have all kinds of electronic components a couple of years ago. Just walk in with the broken fan and ask for a spare part... the entrance is kernstrasse 55.. the one which is able to help there is mr.

Re: [swinog] DDOS DNS Attack by Netgear Products caused by CNAME instead of A record?

netgear tech support has confirmed there is a problem in one of the models and released a fixed firmware. Great! How do I tell the customers? Mit redirect the http traffic for those customer to an webpage which explain and offer a download link on that page maybe combine with a dns ratelimit

Re: [swinog] Zensur / Kobik / Sperrungen ?

Hat jemand dass von euch schon gelesen ? http://www.golem.de/news/filesharing-schweiz-will-internetsperren-auf-das-urheberrecht-ausweiten-1305-99390.html Bedenklich das solche quellen mehr wissen als die zukünftig betroffenen. wobei ich das kaum glauben kann, das liesst sich wie ein

Re: [swinog] vdsl2 line gone bad - ideas ?

Hi Tobias, maybe a look into the DSL spectrum display in the fritzbox will show some hint to decide its DSL related or just on the Network level it need a bit experiences to interpret that display, but basically if there are gaps in the spectrum there is definitely something wrong. could be

Re: [swinog] ISP service management tool

i looking for such tool as well i didnt get the nocproject working. The VM image seems to have an strange format, at least vmware doesnt like it Roger Am 01/11/2012 04:59, schrieb Stanislav Sinyagin: so far, nobody has come up with something useful, so I guess I should start a new project

Re: [swinog] Old functional hardware - where does it best go?

if someone somthing like DSLAM with the apropriate Patchpanel has to throw away, i could use such things for at least 24 Ports. please drop me a note. Roger Am 07/09/2012 11:09, schrieb Martin Ebnoether: On the Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 03:18:22PM +0200, Jeroen Massar blubbered: Hi Jeroen. As

[swinog] Could someone from Cablecom contact me off-list

Hi Could someone from Cablecom contact me off-list? Its about SMTP/MX. Thanks a lot raf Nine Internet Solutions AG Raffael Schmid Albisriederstrasse 243c 8047 Zuerich 044 637 40 00 raffael.sch...@nine.ch signature.asc Description: Digital signature

[swinog] Bluewin SMTP Policy

(small) isp's have resolved this problem. Thank you, Roger Schmid ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

Re: [swinog] Bluewin SMTP Policy

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Adrian Ulrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Roger, Now we found out that bluewin doesn't allow authenticated smtp-relay from users outside their ip-range, so all our customers with bluewin-mailadresses would have no smtp-server available. That's not entirely

Re: [swinog] Bluewin SMTP Policy

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Roger Schmid wrote: [..] Otherwise spammers would open 100th's of free accounts and use them to send spam from non-bluewin IPs :-/ I see the problem, but perhaps something like a captcha would also be sufficient

Re: [swinog] Bluewin SMTP Policy

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Roger Schmid wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just display the captcha from the signup on $pornsite, a person will fill it in for you, captcha bypassed

[swinog] mx.freesurf.ch harddisk

Hello swinog! Since about two days we get this message in our logs. I hope that someone of sunrise/freesurf reads this list, because maybe they should check their harddisk? postfix/smtp[18192]: 63E4860005: host mx.freesurf.ch[194.158.229.68] said: 421 4.3.0 collect: Cannot write

Re: [swinog] vtx ADSL /30 subnet practice

/listinfo/swinog csdatabrasil Ltda. Roger Schmid Rua Arquiteto Luiz Nunes 186 Imbiribeira CEP: 51170-430 Recife/ PE BR +55 81 3422 1714 US: +1 360 515 33 80 CH:+41 32 5110858 UK: +44 8444845331 VOIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] attachment: linha.jpg

Re: [swinog] Re: blocking ports?

isn't the most spam comming via compromized Computers ? adsl Dynamic or dialup user you should never trust them if the say the dont spam. they have to send mail the way smtp is thought for, that means send email to the smtp relay next to you. prevent him to send email via any other relay. if

Re: [swinog] RE: swinog Digest, Vol 26, Issue 2

have a lot of technical stuff, we don't need anymore. we would like to give this stuff away to people who can use this. i dont know, if verythink is fully functional working or complete, but the most should be: - a lot of schmid watson 3 modems (x.21 interface) incl. cables - a lot of schmid

Re: [swinog] to SPF or not to SPF

Well to use other SMTP relay than the one from the used ISP is not allways possible, and should be prevented anyway. nearly 100% of the spam is caused by direct senders, very seldom they use the ISP's Relay. so lets close that big spamfriendly hole. My opinion of corse -- Original

Re: [swinog] to SPF or not to SPF

-- Original Message -- From: Bernard Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:22:25 +0100 Schmid wrote: Well to use other SMTP relay than the one from the used ISP is not allways possible, and should be prevented anyway. Why

Re: [swinog] Cablecom Internet Port 25

jawohl.. den smtp von CC verwenden, alles andere soll eh nicht sein ;-) schoene weihnachten Roger -- Original Message -- From: Xaver Aerni [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: swinog@swinog.ch Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:00:54 +0100 Hallo, Ich stell die Frage