On 10/13/2020 6:30 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020, 17:41 Volker Schmidt mailto:vosc...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I changed the crossing to the way we do it in many parts of
Europe, i.e. a crossing node _and_ a crossing way. This was
described as an option on the
On 9/4/2020 6:24 PM, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
Sep 4, 2020, 18:19 by tagging@openstreetmap.org:
node and discovered the shelter_type=rock_shelter subtag, but the
map in
question didn't render it any differently. Revisiting the site in fair
weather, I found a tiny
On 9/4/2020 3:45 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
A surveillance cam isn't a "contact" and contact:* is STILL a stupid
idea.
Oh, and what's wrong with url=*? Especially as the wiki page endorses it.
Nb, the link to the "Surveillance under Surveillance" project that you
quoted doesn't mention the url=*
On 9/4/2020 2:10 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am Fr., 4. Sept. 2020 um 19:03 Uhr schrieb Jmapb via Tagging
mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org>>:
On 9/4/2020 11:34 AM, Jmapb via Tagging wrote:
> The "See also" section of that page seems to suggest the
und
On 9/4/2020 11:34 AM, Jmapb via Tagging wrote:
The "See also" section of that page seems to suggest the undocumented
tag `contact:webcam` for this purpose.
(Mea culpa, contact:webcam is indeed documented on the contact page.)
___
Taggi
On 9/3/2020 11:51 PM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
I've created a proposal to formalise shelter_type=rock_shelter, while
currently in-use, there is disagreement within the community on if
this tag should be used and features are commonly mis-tagged.
So I'm hoping with this proposal and voting we can
On 9/4/2020 11:08 AM, dktue wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to tag the link to the (current) JPEG-image of a webcam, but
the wiki doesn't state how to do so [1].
Any suggestions how to tag this?
Cheers,
dktue
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurveillance
The "See also" section of
On 3/15/2020 6:18 AM, Markus Peloso wrote:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/give_box
A small facility where people drop off and pick up various types of
items in the sense of free sharing.
Hi
After "Clarify whatever explicit abstaining is the same as no vote"
and the
On 2/26/2020 3:54 AM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
There are some users on the wiki who seem to treat these two tags as
near-synonyms
man_made=petroleum_well
man_made=pumping_rig
The later was approved, but the first is much more common.
The proposal in 2008 for pumping_rig said
"A tag for
On 2/16/2020 8:21 AM, Steve Doerr wrote:
On 15/02/2020 16:56, Markus Peloso wrote:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/in-kind_donation
For a place that takes in-kind donations.
My immediate reaction is that this sounds like a very similar concept
to 'give box', which was
On 2/6/2020 10:47 AM, Paul Allen wrote:
And if they wanted to comment but not vote they'd add their comment to the
talk page instead. Right?
Absolutely! If that's what the instructions said. But they clearly say
that if you do want to comment, but you don't want to vote, then choose
[Sorry for the repost, corrected wiki link below...]
On 2/6/2020 5:40 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Actually, in the past we always have counted every kind of comment
(vote yes / no and abstain) as part of the total, which indeed led to
the situation that an (explicit) abstention effectively
On 2/6/2020 5:40 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Actually, in the past we always have counted every kind of comment
(vote yes / no and abstain) as part of the total, which indeed led to
the situation that an (explicit) abstention effectively counted like a
no-vote.
Are we going to change this
On 1/15/2020 12:55 AM, European Water Project wrote:
Would it be appropriate to use the tag "seasonal" for a water fountain
(whether tagged as "amenity=drinking_water" or "amenity = fountain and
drinking_water = yes" )?
Don't forget about man_made=drinking_fountain!
J
On 1/11/2020 7:13 PM, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 18:18, Jmapb via Tagging
wrote:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97010406
- It was originally a vehicle route but was changed to pedestrian with
painted bike and foot lanes. For motor vehicles, only emergency
On 1/11/2020 11:16 AM, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
I imagine that virtually all real-world pedestrian ways that are
one-way for pedestrians would be on dedicated pedestrian ways - that
is, highway=footway. If that's correct, oneway=yes can be interpreted
as referring to pedestrians on footways (it
On 1/7/2020 7:26 AM, Paul Allen wrote:
And yet the examples you give are shops, or shelves within shops.
They are
NOT boxes. On those grounds alone, "give box" is a very bad name. In
any case,
who is doing the giving to whom?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Give-away_shop uses the generic term
On 1/6/2020 5:41 PM, Markus Peloso wrote:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Givebox
A facility where people drop off and pick up various types of goods in
the sense of free sharing.
Hi
Based on the
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Reuse
On 12/6/2019 1:28 PM, Janko Mihelić wrote:
I think the "forward" and "backward" don't belong in a role of a
relation. Oneway=yes on a way should be enough. In the Wiki discussion
it is said that if there is one little "oneway" way in a big branch,
then all the ways in a branch should be checked
On 11/7/2019 2:09 PM, Mark Wagner wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 10:26:14 +
marc marc wrote:
ere possession of a bicycle is forbidden
can you share the a picture of this traffic sign ?
It's a sign for a state natural area rather than a federal wilderness
area, and the situation is a little
On 11/6/2019 3:08 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
bicycle_pushed=no?
bicycle_pushed is more clear for someone encountering it
for the first time - bicycle=total_ban is a bit confusing
Especially as in some places access for bicycles
may be "never" (explicit "no bicycle" signs)
or "only during
On 10/22/2019 10:36 AM, Ilya Zverev wrote:
I understand the reasoning, but I don’t see how can I follow the
“truth on the ground” principle. Are there any guidelines on choosing
the correct tag? For some reason people don’t write its purpose on a
side. And again, images in three of these pages
On 10/17/2019 1:01 AM, John Willis via Tagging wrote:
Also, how do you specify which games are offered? gambling=pachinko is
in the wiki, but what about adult_gaming_centre? is gambling=* the
default way to define what games are offered at such facilities? that
seems to be vague or missing.
On 10/8/2019 6:20 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
I was wondering about the same thing, because you've then also got
Country & Western, German, any & all varieties of Gay ... ?
Bit of an awkward one, but there are pub's in Northern & Inland
Australia that white people are NOT welcome in (& I'm
On 9/14/2019 10:53 AM, Tim Magee wrote:
I would absolutely agree with this use case. Especially for cases such as the
regularly mentioned Burger King. If somebody from out of town is either
traveling through or armchair mapping they could be confused. If they are
using the ID editor, it suggests
On 8/20/2019 4:57 AM, Andrew Davidson wrote:
On 20/8/19 6:24 pm, John Willis via Tagging wrote:
So let's standardize on a tag:
amenity=hitching_post
hitching_post=dog ?
Interestingly, one of the items they sell is a green 30x30cm marker
to go on the sidewalk in front of the pole -
On 8/16/2019 10:56 PM, Warin wrote:
I think the key:educational maybe better used later for schools,
colleges, cram schools etc.
The (dormant) proposal for these was
education=school|university|tutor|cram_school etc.
On 8/16/2019 4:59 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
a long route may go through several colour changes but will be signed
with its own marker at principal junctions. (Where I map, there are
only a handful of long-distance routes affected by this: the Long
Path, the Highlands Trail, the Finger Lakes Trail,
On 8/15/2019 10:11 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Anyway, just a property like "service:bicycle:repair=yes" and a name would not
work, IMHO
No indeed, I wouldn't recommend it as a stand-alone feature tag. But as
extra tag to a shop or amenity, it think it would help.
Also note that for
On 8/14/2019 6:45 PM, dcapillae wrote:
Obviusly, «amenity=community_centre»
Sounds correct.
For anything that's not a bicycle shop but still does bicycle repairs
(I've seen cafes, car repair shops, outdoor shops, and even a church
with this service), consider just adding the
On 8/13/2019 4:50 AM, s8evq wrote:
Currently, there are four tagging scheme tables describing how walking (or
hiking) routes should be tagged.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Walking_Routes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking
On 8/13/2019 12:14 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
Alas, we can't do what Google Maps does, and aggregate the private
information of everyone carrying a cell phone to measure current
traffic speeds. That appears to be how Google's router makes its
decisions.
Of course we used to have something along
On 7/5/2019 3:08 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
I read joost's comment as "The operator of this map object is a
specific private citizen"
not as a redefinition of "operator."
Hah, probably. Regardless, I do think that Les Incroyables
Comestibles/Incredible Edibles fits better under the brand key, or
On 7/5/2019 12:18 PM, joost schouppe wrote:
Operator is actually "a specific private citizen"
What's the source of this definition? On the English wiki, operator is
"a company, corporation, person or any other entity who is directly in
charge of the current operation of a map object."
J
On 7/5/2019 10:56 AM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
I don't think it would be necessary to combine "bbq=no" and
"bring_own_bbq=yes" - if a feature such as a leisure=picnic_site is
tagged "bring_own_bbq=yes" that is sufficient. The tag "bbq=no", like
most tags with value "no", can be omitted.
This is
On 7/4/2019 11:17 PM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
We've also had problems with features tagged "tourism=camp_site" or
"landuse=meadow" plus "barrier=hedge" or "barrier=wall". Is the
barrier supposed to be an area or a linear feature in this case?
I can see the confusion here, but I think this rule
On 7/5/2019 2:16 AM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
So, what's a better term for a test prep centre, cramp school, or
tutoring office? There the rarely used tag office=tutoring, but that
doesn't quite cover a place like Kaplan or Kumon -
https://au.kumonglobal.com/ - https://www.kaptest.com/
On 7/2/2019 8:20 AM, marc marc wrote:
Le 02.07.19 à 13:38, Joseph Eisenberg a écrit :
There are two similar property tags that describe the presence of a
barbecue (BBQ) grill at another feature such as a campsite or picnic
site.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bbq
On 6/18/2019 10:14 AM, Paul Allen wrote:
Are there any objections to man_made=hitching_point? I think it
will be a little used item.
You're probably right there. Not much call for it. And unlikely to
be rendered until we get vector
carto, and maybe not even then. But, analogously
It is done. Interested parties, please see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcannabis and comment here
or there. I'll be watching the discussion page. J
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On 6/14/2019 5:33 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
Martin wrote:
>It would imply adding shop=cannabis to pharmacies? In some countries
the sale of medicine is restricted to pharmacies.
Not necessarily. IMO, we could also use the cannabis:medical=yes/only
tag to pharmacies offering it.
Yes, my
41 matches
Mail list logo
