Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-16 Thread Philip Barnes
On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 16:13 -0500, John F. Eldredge wrote: I have seen some tight intersections, with buildings directly adjoining the roadway at all four corners, where a maxlength tag would also be useful. A passenger car or a delivery truck would be able to turn the corner, but a

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-15 Thread John F. Eldredge
I have seen some tight intersections, with buildings directly adjoining the roadway at all four corners, where a maxlength tag would also be useful. A passenger car or a delivery truck would be able to turn the corner, but a tractor-trailer rig (heavy goods vehicle) or bus would get wedged in

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-15 Thread Colin Smale
That would depend on so many factors, including wheelbase, overhang, width, driving skill, weight distribution on individual wheels, even speed.. Google for swept path analysis //colin On 2015-05-15 23:13, John F. Eldredge wrote: I have seen some tight intersections, with buildings

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-13 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 3:33 AM, p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote: On Wed May 13 09:02:18 2015 GMT+0100, Ross wrote: Not the way I read their email. However there is already provision for: maxspeed:vehicle http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed and maxspeed:advisory

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-13 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-05-13 10:31 GMT+02:00 Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl: maxheight and maxwidth are indeed not advisory, but they are both still only legal and have :physical subtags to indicate the actual width/height of the obstruction. We won't be needing that for maxspeed I think. on a sidenote:

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-13 Thread Colin Smale
Don't agree with this... there have been discussions in the past about whether the width of a way includes the pavements etc... Where a road goes under a bridge, where do you measure the height of the road? The highest point (not good enough for vehicles) or the lowest highest point or in the

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-13 Thread phil
On Wed May 13 09:02:18 2015 GMT+0100, Ross wrote: Not the way I read their email. However there is already provision for: maxspeed:vehicle http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed and maxspeed:advisory http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:advisory So I'd

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-13 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:03 AM, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote: Don't agree with this... there have been discussions in the past about whether the width of a way includes the pavements etc... Where a road goes under a bridge, where do you measure the height of the road? The highest

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-13 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 2:56 AM, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-05-11 13:08 GMT+02:00 pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com: On 11 May 2015 at 11:40, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:04 AM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote: Well, in the US,

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-13 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-05-13 11:03 GMT+02:00 Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org: maxspeed=75 mph (or even none in some cases) maxspeed:hgv=65 mph maxspeed:night=65 mph maxspeed:hgv:night=55 mph time dependent maxspeeds typically get tagged with the conditional syntax, e.g. maxspeed:conditional=100 @

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-13 Thread pmailkeey .
On 13 May 2015 at 10:03, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote: Don't agree with this... there have been discussions in the past about whether the width of a way includes the pavements etc... Where a road goes under a bridge, where do you measure the height of the road? Are we talking

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-13 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote: A signed height limit is likely somewhat conservative. On a USA road way that's an advisory sign, but if you run a larger load under the bridge and something happens it's your fault. The actual maximum height is

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-13 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote: not by name, explicitely, but that's how we've been using it since the very beginning. It will be really hard to change that. We also have maxheight and maxwidth, I think it's obvious those are hard limits, not advisory. That's

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-13 Thread Paul Johnson
If I understand what pmailkeey is saying, he's suggesting an expansion of maxspeed into a namespace, so maxspeed:advisory could be a recognizable thing. On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Ross i...@4x4falcon.com wrote: And read the wiki page on maxspeed:

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-13 Thread Jo
2015-05-11 13:08 GMT+02:00 pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com: On 11 May 2015 at 11:40, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:04 AM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote: Well, in the US, I've just been tagging the 'ramp' speeds (

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-13 Thread Ross
Not the way I read their email. However there is already provision for: maxspeed:vehicle http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed and maxspeed:advisory http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:advisory So I'd suggest that maxspeed is the legal speed limit as per the wiki

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-12 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-05-11 13:08 GMT+02:00 pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com: Maxspeed does not imply 'limit' by name. it does, maximum is about a limit... Cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-12 Thread Ross
And read the wiki page on maxspeed: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed the maximum legalspeed limit http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Speed_limits Cheers Ross On 12/05/15 22:36, pmailkeey . wrote: On 12 May 2015 at 12:29, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-12 Thread pmailkeey .
On 12 May 2015 at 12:29, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-05-11 13:08 GMT+02:00 pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com: Maxspeed does not imply 'limit' by name. it does, maximum is about a limit... Please reread my previous message - and appreciate that maxima can be

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-11 Thread Ross
In Australia as well they are advisory so are therefore not speed limits. You can not be fined for exceeding the advisory signs. The speed limit, and therefore maxspeed, is sign posted with a sign like this:

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-11 Thread Eric Sibert
In Italy we've been using something like maxspeed=50; source:maxspeed=IT:urban maxspeed=90; source:maxspeed=IT:rural +1 in France: maxspeed=50; source:maxspeed=FR:urban maxspeed=90; source:maxspeed=FR:rural maxspeed=130; source:maxspeed=FR:motorway maxspeed=30; source:maxspeed=FR:zone30

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-11 Thread pmailkeey .
On 11 May 2015 at 11:40, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:04 AM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote: Well, in the US, I've just been tagging the 'ramp' speeds ( https://goo.gl/maps/Bw8Is ) as a normal 'maxspeed'. I know several other users here in

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-11 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-05-11 11:04 GMT+02:00 James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com: Plus, while the cops can't pull you over and give you a ticket for exceeding the 'ramp' speed (if they do, you can challenge it in court if it's just a normal speeding ticket), they can however, nail you with a reckless driving

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-11 Thread James Mast
Well, in the US, I've just been tagging the 'ramp' speeds ( https://goo.gl/maps/Bw8Is ) as a normal 'maxspeed'. I know several other users here in the US have been doing it the same way. However, I wouldn't be opposed if we wanted to tag them as 'maxspeed:ramp=35 mph', but only if we could

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-11 Thread pmailkeey .
UK Max speed advisory signs: Sign http://roadsignsdirect.co.uk/sites/default/files/styles/width220/public/513.2_0.png?itok=4-8s-qxC With additional info http://www.1stdrive.com/Advisory_speed_sign.JPG Variable http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/c8/Uk_40_mph_advisory.jpg -- Mike.

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-11 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Andrew MacKinnon andrew...@gmail.com wrote: How do you tag speed limits on curves and highway on/off ramps? At least in Ontario, these speed limits are advisory only and signed with a yellow sign (and sometimes on curves you will see a curve speed limit sign

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-11 Thread Simone Saviolo
2015-05-11 1:41 GMT+02:00 Andrew MacKinnon andrew...@gmail.com: How do you tag speed limits on curves and highway on/off ramps? At least in Ontario, these speed limits are advisory only and signed with a yellow sign (and sometimes on curves you will see a curve speed limit sign and a higher

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-11 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 2:04 AM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote: However, I wouldn't be opposed if we wanted to tag them as 'maxspeed:ramp=35 mph', but only if we could get the routers on board as that does help in the time estimates and also to harp a user if he's going, say, 20

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-11 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
I believe the solution for the problem has already been mentioned: the used tag maxspeed:advisory=* seems a good way to make the distinction between actual maxspeeds and advisory maxspeeds: http://taginfo.osm.org/keys/maxspeed%3Aadvisory#values Let's document this in the wiki, e.g. here:

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-11 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:04 AM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote: Well, in the US, I've just been tagging the 'ramp' speeds ( https://goo.gl/maps/Bw8Is ) as a normal 'maxspeed'. I know several other users here in the US have been doing it the same way. Please don't, as this is

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-11 Thread Ross
Well if you read the wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed that's exactly what maxspeed implies. and maxspeed:hgv etc is also there Cheers Ross On 11/05/15 21:08, pmailkeey . wrote: On 11 May 2015 at 11:40, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org mailto:ba...@ursamundi.org

[Tagging] Maxspeed

2015-05-10 Thread Andrew MacKinnon
How do you tag speed limits on curves and highway on/off ramps? At least in Ontario, these speed limits are advisory only and signed with a yellow sign (and sometimes on curves you will see a curve speed limit sign and a higher general speed limit sign right beside each other). I have used

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals vs. maxspeed:variable=yes + maxspeed=x

2014-12-21 Thread Janko Mihelić
2014-12-20 15:02 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at: Is it too much of a challenge for router developers to look at one or two other tags? Not a big challenge, but an unnecessary one. Also, a challenge for mappers. And won't maxspeed=number + maxspeed:type=signals (or

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals vs. maxspeed:variable=yes + maxspeed=x

2014-12-20 Thread Janko Mihelić
I like maxspeed:variable=* simply because it lets you use maxspeed=* in its original sense. Maxspeed=signals robs you of that original tag and routers now have to dig deep into tags to understand the real maxspeed. Keep the simple tags, and build around them, that's what I say. Janko. Dana 19.

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals vs. maxspeed:variable=yes + maxspeed=x

2014-12-20 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 20.12.2014 09:42, Janko Mihelić wrote: I like maxspeed:variable=* simply because it lets you use maxspeed=* in its original sense. Maxspeed=signals robs you of that original tag and routers now have to dig deep into tags to understand the real maxspeed. Is it too much of a challenge for

[Tagging] maxspeed=signals vs. maxspeed:variable=yes + maxspeed=x

2014-12-19 Thread Martin Vonwald
Hi! As the usage of maxspeed:variable continues to increase, I would like to draw your attention again to its proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Dynamic_maxspeed In my opinion maxspeed:variable is far superior to maxspeed=signals as it provides not only the

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals vs. maxspeed:variable=yes + maxspeed=x

2014-12-19 Thread Volker Schmidt
* what is the maximum possible(!) speed limit The possible max speed limit is most likely the speed limit fo that type of road in that country, unless you have better information (from what source with what licence?), but that's not really helpful for a router * what is the reason(!) for the

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-28 Thread John F. Eldredge
Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de wrote: Am 26.06.2012 16:55, schrieb Paul Johnson: It seems like tagging for the lowest, highest and default limits would be useful. What's the purpose of a lowest speed limit? I don't think it's useful, as we are still speaking about legal

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-28 Thread Toby Murray
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:03 PM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote: A lowest speed limit means that, under normal circumstances, traffic is supposed to go at least that fast, and someone going slower can be cited for obstructing traffic.  It doesn't get enforced when heavy traffic,

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-28 Thread Peter Wendorff
Am 28.06.2012 23:50, schrieb Toby Murray: On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:03 PM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote: A lowest speed limit means that, under normal circumstances, traffic is supposed to go at least that fast, and someone going slower can be cited for obstructing traffic. It

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-28 Thread Philip Barnes
The lowest variable speed limit I have seen on a UK motorway is 40 mph, but that doesn't mean it can't go lower. I do not believe that there is a defined minimum on motorways, rather it is up to the discretion of the police, I'd they deem you are going to slowly they will escort you off. Phil

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-28 Thread Paul Johnson
On Jun 28, 2012 2:04 PM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote: A lowest speed limit means that, under normal circumstances, traffic is supposed to go at least that fast, and someone going slower can be cited for obstructing traffic. It doesn't get enforced when heavy traffic, road

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-27 Thread Peter Wendorff
Hi. That's how it's documented and defined, but I fear, if you look into maxspeed tags of countries not using the metric system on signs, we probably have many bugs in values without units, if you use that assumption. It's similar to everything else: If there's nothing declared, you don't

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-27 Thread Peter Wendorff
Am 26.06.2012 16:55, schrieb Paul Johnson: It seems like tagging for the lowest, highest and default limits would be useful. What's the purpose of a lowest speed limit? I don't think it's useful, as we are still speaking about legal speed limits, while often lower practical speed limits

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-27 Thread Martin Vonwald
2012/6/27 Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de: Hi. That's how it's documented and defined, but I fear, if you look into maxspeed tags of countries not using the metric system on signs, we probably have many bugs in values without units, if you use that assumption. It's similar to

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-27 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 09:33:49AM +0200, Peter Wendorff wrote: Am 26.06.2012 16:55, schrieb Paul Johnson: It seems like tagging for the lowest, highest and default limits would be useful. What's the purpose of a lowest speed limit? I'd say - Worst case travel time estimation? Flo --

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-27 Thread Peter Wendorff
Am 27.06.2012 09:36, schrieb Martin Vonwald: 2012/6/27 Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de: Hi. That's how it's documented and defined, but I fear, if you look into maxspeed tags of countries not using the metric system on signs, we probably have many bugs in values without units, if you

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-27 Thread Peter Wendorff
Am 27.06.2012 09:37, schrieb Florian Lohoff: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 09:33:49AM +0200, Peter Wendorff wrote: Am 26.06.2012 16:55, schrieb Paul Johnson: It seems like tagging for the lowest, highest and default limits would be useful. What's the purpose of a lowest speed limit? I'd say -

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-27 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.dewrote: Am 26.06.2012 16:55, schrieb Paul Johnson: It seems like tagging for the lowest, highest and default limits would be useful. What's the purpose of a lowest speed limit? To be able to display a range, or

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-27 Thread Eckhart Wörner
Hi Paul, Am Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2012, 07:07:49 schrieb Paul Johnson: What's the purpose of a lowest speed limit? To be able to display a range, or estimate the correct value when other data (such as speed limits that vary based on time of day) is available. Speed limits that only depend on

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-27 Thread Janko Mihelić
2012/6/27 Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org To be able to display a range, or estimate the correct value when other data (such as speed limits that vary based on time of day) is available. I think that estimation of slowest possible trip is not something we should be thinking about. In my

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-27 Thread Philip Barnes
+1 Real time estimates are best handled by TMS, or similar. Phil -- Sent from my Nokia N9 On 27/06/2012 15:40 Janko Mihelić wrote: 2012/6/27 Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org To be able to display a range, or estimate the correct value when other data (such as speed limits that vary

[Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-26 Thread Martin Vonwald
Hi! Lately I was mapping features along motorways, including speed limits. Some of them are displayed on electronic signs, but usually only change in case of traffic jams, accidents, dangerous weather conditions, ... and so on. Now should these really be tagged with maxspeed=signals? All of them

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-26 Thread John Sturdy
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com wrote: All of them showed 100. And under normal circumstances they will always show 100. The tag maxspeed=signals doesn't carry any useful information in this situation How about the default_maxspeed tag, which is already

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-26 Thread David Earl
On 26/06/2012 11:43, Martin Vonwald wrote: Lately I was mapping features along motorways, including speed limits. Some of them are displayed on electronic signs, but usually only change in case of traffic jams... All of them showed 100. And under normal circumstances they will always show 100.

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-26 Thread Philip Barnes
I was going to point you at the M6 around Walsall, but having looked at it I am even more confused. Some ways are tagged maxspeed 70mph, some are tagged as maxspeed signals, and a section is 110kmh which is clearly very wrong. I will correct and email the mapper. Am not sure of purely using

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-26 Thread Martin Vonwald
2012/6/26 Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk: Do we need a separate tag such as limit = variable, maxspeed = 70mph. At present there is a note about active traffic management but I assume is ignored by routers. Actually I think we do need a different tagging and also some different

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-26 Thread Martin Vonwald
2012/6/26 John Sturdy jcg.stu...@gmail.com: As far as I know, variable speed limits tend to be used in areas prone to heavy congestion The last two weekends I drove on the A9 and S6 in Austria. The electronic speed signs there are used mainly to lower the speed limit in case of bad weather.

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-26 Thread Peter Wendorff
Am 26.06.2012 14:41, schrieb Martin Vonwald: 2012/6/26 Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk: Do we need a separate tag such as limit = variable, maxspeed = 70mph. At present there is a note about active traffic management but I assume is ignored by routers. Actually I think we do need a

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-26 Thread Martin Vonwald
2012/6/26 Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de: I would prefer to allow (not require) an additional unit information (mph, km/h) Sorry - my writing was misleading. Of course the unit should be allowed! * A different tag should be used if the speed limit is somehow managed, maybe

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-26 Thread David Earl
On 26/06/2012 12:39, David Earl wrote: On 26/06/2012 11:43, Martin Vonwald wrote: Lately I was mapping features along motorways, including speed limits. Some of them are displayed on electronic signs, but usually only change in case of traffic jams... All of them showed 100. And under normal

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-26 Thread Toby Murray
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com wrote: Why do I think that maxspeed=signals is a bad idea? Because it doesn't carry a lot of useful information. The speed limit is especially important to routing applications. For such an application maxspeed=signals is no

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-26 Thread Paul Johnson
On Jun 26, 2012 5:41 AM, Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com wrote: Why do I think that maxspeed=signals is a bad idea? Because it doesn't carry a lot of useful information. The speed limit is especially important to routing applications. For such an application maxspeed=signals is no

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-26 Thread Paul Johnson
On Jun 26, 2012 5:47 AM, John Sturdy jcg.stu...@gmail.com wrote: As far as I know, variable speed limits tend to be used in areas prone to heavy congestion, so routing applications should probably assume it's a slow road (at least during the daytime). In the US, the most common variable speed

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-26 Thread Paul Johnson
On Jun 26, 2012 6:03 AM, Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de wrote: I would prefer to allow (not require) an additional unit information (mph, km/h), simply to encourage data consumers to deal with them as they are usually added by users. On the other hand no data consumer can be sure

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-26 Thread Martin Vonwald
I would prefer to allow (not require) an additional unit information (mph, km/h), simply to encourage data consumers to deal with them as they are usually added by users. On the other hand no data consumer can be sure about a (global) default unit if there's no unit given. I thought it was

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-26 Thread John Sturdy
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: In the US, the most common variable speed limit scenario is a school zone. Rules for when the lower limit applies varies.  Some are certain hours of the day and only on school days, others are year round whenever children

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed=signals

2012-06-26 Thread Eckhart Wörner
Hi Martin, Am Dienstag, 26. Juni 2012, 12:43:10 schrieb Martin Vonwald: The tag maxspeed=signals doesn't carry any useful information in this situation. If I tag those speed limits with this tag we completely lose the information that on this part(s) of the motorway one usually can drive