n nodes or ways on the wiki
page (as it is currently).
In fact, we should recommend against putting on ways.
2014-04-09 16:1
On 2014-04-10 16:59, Pieren wrote :
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Florian Schäfer flor...@schaeferban.de
wrote:
True, in the most cases it is not important. But sometimes it is, for
example in my T-deadend example, mentioned on this ML.
All cases can be covered by the tagging on nodes.
Hi,
Side note: Please note that I just found two versions of the "Use
the noexit=yes tag..." text. One ahead that says that it must be
used only on nodes and the former one inside that says that it can
be used on ways too. I left the newcomer where it was: ahead
On 2014-04-21 22:20, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote :
2014-04-21 20:48 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com
mailto:ricoz@gmail.com:
Without any additional tags like tunnel=* or covered=*, a
layer=-1 river shouldn't be rendered differently than a
layer=1 or
even in the
On 2014-04-22 23:46, Richard Welty wrote :
i would like to add emergency (for emergency vehicles) to the list of
vehicle types for the except tag.
Supposing that emergency vehicles can do almost everything (who would
tell a fire van for example not to drive on the wrong side over some
distance
On 2014-04-23 16:37, Richard Welty wrote :
On 4/23/14 10:14 AM, André Pirard wrote:
On 2014-04-22 23:46, Richard Welty wrote :
i would like to add emergency (for emergency vehicles) to the list of
vehicle types for the except tag.
Supposing that emergency vehicles can do almost everything
On 2014-04-25 08:03, Bryce Nesbitt
wrote :
How best should I tag informal swimming areas? These
typically have no lifeguard or facilities. An example
deep-content site for these types of holes is:
Hi,
This is about OSM ticket https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/5163:
The rendering of highway=path and highway=track is barely distinguishable.
For example, many huge width highway=residential continue to an extra
thin =track and then invisibly change to a =path.
Just like on my National
On 2014-05-19 18:35, SomeoneElse wrote :
André Pirard wrote:
Hi,
This is about OSM ticket https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/5163:
The rendering of highway=path and highway=track is barely
distinguishable.
Just my 2p, but personally I don't think that the rendering of
highway=track
On 2014-05-19 19:41, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote :
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 2:38 PM, André Pirard
a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you make that test: asking people which is track or path? Where
walkers and tractors would go?
Isn't this the job of the map key?
Strangely, I was just looking
On 2014-05-26 18:10, Marc Gemis wrote :
I have the following problem with Nominatim:
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=36580812
It tells me that is part of the neighbourhood "Bosstraat".
On 2014-05-30 18:47, SomeoneElse wrote
:
We had a long discussion in
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2014-April/017247.html
and now I saw in the English wiki
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:noexit
High,
During the discussion of this tag, it was said that a sure culprit for
incorrect noexit=yes tags, is a misleading phrasing
Use the noexit=yes tag at the end of a highway
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway=* to indicate that
there is no possibility to travel further by any
On 2014-06-01 21:17, Nelson A. de
Oliveira wrote :
Can't the wiki page be protected?
Would you do the updates, corrections and translation?
I think it should just be mandatory to prepare/publish any
substantial change on the sister mailing list.
On 2014-06-04 19:05, Peter Wendorff
wrote :
Am 04.06.2014 18:43, schrieb Andrew Hain:
Over the past few days there have been a number of wiki edits (mainly but
not entirely in German) stating that shop=* and similar tags, contrary to
the “One feature, one OSM
On 2014-05-19 18:12, André Pirard wrote :
This is about OSM ticket https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/5163
(obsolete):
The rendering of highway=path and highway=track is barely
distinguishable.
...
In summary, I don't know how many of you appreciate to tag with this
result where
On 2014-06-05 17:03, Tod Fitch wrote :
On Jun 5, 2014, at 3:03 AM, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Am 04.06.2014 22:35, schrieb André Pirard:
That's another new tagging system though. And even doing it like this
breaks down when there is more than one shop in the building.
Therefore I believe
Hi,
Some data of the map changes often, in particular what's on the
road: traffic signs, bus lines etc.
It would be interesting if someone tackling a region could determine
what in his interests was checked the longest ago. Hence the need
for a date at the
On 2014-06-09 11:59, Glenn Plas wrote :
On 09-06-14 08:31, André Pirard
wrote:
Hi,
Some data of the map changes often, in particular what's on the
road: traffic signs, bus lines etc.
It would
On 2014-06-09 19:25, SomeoneElse wrote :
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Actually the source:maxspeed tag was discussed years ago (2009
IIRR) on this list and by the time approved. The idea to use
maxspeed:type instead is very new compared to this, and there wasn't
any actual proposal to see
Hi,
Following this discussion here is a proposed clarification to Key:source
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source.
The goal is to define the word, make date mandatory, use ISO format,
define per source tag meaning.
Is there any objection or suggestion for changes?
*survey* -mm[-dd]
Am 10.06.2014 21:51, schrieb Michael Maier:
So I created a Proposal Page for the values of the 'door' key:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/door
RFC phase is now open!
+1
also relevant to dogs, unfortunately ;-)
doors can also be between parts of a building (rooms).
On 2014-06-15 17:07, Andreas Goss wrote :
So I got a bit of work done with the WikiProject Emergency Cleanup,
but now I'm not really sure about emergency access.
- Is there a difference between service=emergency_access,
access=emergency and emergency=yes(on roads)?
As I recall my readings
On 2014-06-15 16:34, Matthijs Melissen wrote :
On 14 Jun 2014 18:25, Andrew Hain andrewhain...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
The uses of the tag addr:housename in the database[1] does not match
documentation[2] well. A high prroportion of uses are accidental
I also think addr:housename should only be
On 2014-06-15 22:11, Martin
Koppenhoefer wrote :
Am 15/giu/2014 um 02:40 schrieb David
Bannon dban...@internode.on.net:
Interestingly, its already contains the recommendation
"source:name=survey 10 November 2012" - I was not aware of that
On 2014-06-18 13:27, François Lacombe wrote :
2014-06-18 11:50 GMT+02:00 François Lacombe
francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu
mailto:francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu:
Could someone precise me why abbreviations should always be
avoided in tagging please ?
I
On 2014-06-15 20:44, Peter Wendorff wrote :
Hi Andreas,
IMHO
- access=emergency is a basic access restriction, which states that only
emergency vehicles are allowed here (unless otherwise specified).
According to Key:access http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access,
there is no
On 2014-06-19 01:49, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote :
Am 19/giu/2014 um 00:38 schrieb André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com:
To exclude all other vehicles, one must add (see key=access category
tree
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Land
Hi, I wonder if this phrase without an explanation link
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source contains appropriate
instructions (or just press news):
*Since the introduction of changesets these tags are often added as
changeset http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset tags rather
#Indiquer_la_source.
Jo
2014-06-26 14:21 GMT+02:00 Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com
mailto:danstowell+...@gmail.com:
2014-06-26 12:44 GMT+01:00 André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com:
Hi, I wonder if this phrase without an explanation link
http
On 2014-07-05 14:50, Peter Wendorff
wrote :
Hi,
so you would call the Mittellandkanal, connecting Elbe and Weser in
Germany a lake?
I agree with Bulwersator. A canal does not necessarily have a flow
direction. It may be built for water transport (then it might
On 2014-07-16 19:09, Andreas Goss wrote :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/BE-Spelling_shop%3Djewelry
I kept it short ;) And I the think the Subject says it all. The use of
jewellers could of course also be considered.
BE means Belgium, for those who do like precision.
On 2014-07-19 08:00, Paul Johnson wrote :
I don't see how that's the case, the reason being that the Supreme
Court has clearly ruled that tribes are above the state but
semi-dependant on the fed, as far as the law is concerned.
Furthermore, the state may still intervene, but has the option
On 2014-07-22 11:01, Jo wrote :
FYI it doesn't seem likely that the event of dropping highway=bus_stop
or highway=speed_camera will be dropped in a foreseeable future,
meaning you'll have to keep double tagging everything.
In Belgium all red light cameras do double duty as speed cameras, so I
On 2014-06-09 12:03, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote :
2014-06-09 8:31 GMT+02:00 André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com:
And that maxspeed thing is the strangest one ever.
source=* almost says that source:maxspeed
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki
On 2014-08-14 07:29, Mateusz Konieczny wrote :
I added to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cave#Tagging_in_OSM how
these may be mapped (tunnels that are available for humans but closed
for typical
tourists may be mapped as highway=path with tunnel=yes and access=private,
and routes
On 2014-08-14 11:08, Janko Mihelić wrote :
Well first, tunnel=yes is obviously wrong. We need to replace this
with cave=yes. Other than that, I have no problems with this. If a
cave has two cave entrances, then information that they are connected
by footpaths is valuable information.
Janko
On 2014-08-14 12:31, Martin Vonwald wrote :
2014-08-14 12:25 GMT+02:00 André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com:
On 2014-08-14 11:08, Janko Mihelić wrote :
Well first, tunnel=yes is obviously wrong. We need to replace
this with cave=yes. Other than
imagine that's why there is no scheme right now.
2014-08-14 8:22 GMT-03:00 André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com:
On 2014-08-14 12:31, Martin Vonwald wrote :
2014-08-14 12:25 GMT+02:00 André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
mailto:a.pirard.pa
rendering, and especially like this:
On 2014-08-14 14:00, SomeoneElse wrote :
On 14/08/2014 12:22, André Pirard wrote:
I know I still have to learn that OSM is fuzzy, but using cave=yes
for paths would first need a definition of it in the highway=* page.
No, it really wouldn't(1).
Cheers
Hi,
It's a well known fact that many people complain to tag in vain because
what they tag doesn't show on the map (e.g. mini-golf vs tennis pitch),
because they're told to open a rendering ticket which replies that only
official tags are supported, and because they open a vote for an
official tag
On 2014-08-15 16:12, André Pirard wrote :
Hi,
It's a well known fact that many people complain to tag in vain
because what they tag doesn't show on the map (e.g. mini-golf vs
tennis pitch), because they're told to open a rendering ticket which
replies that only official tags are supported
.
This map already exists :
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-1EYAKZQ31ck/T0iWNbp34wI/BIs/oBJMF_ViWFM/s1600/smarties.jpg
--
FrViPofm
Le 15/08/2014 16:12, André Pirard a écrit :
Hi,
It's a well known fact that many people complain to tag in vain
because what they tag doesn't show on the map
they don't tag stuff to be rendered
with the same style? How do you ensure the map stays usable?
regards
Peter
Am 15.08.2014 um 16:12 schrieb André Pirard:
Hi,
It's a well known fact that many people complain to tag in vain because
what they tag doesn't show on the map (e.g. mini-golf vs
On 2014-08-15 16:12, André Pirard wrote :
It's a well known fact that many people complain to tag in vain
because what they tag doesn't show on the map (e.g. mini-golf vs
tennis pitch), because they're told to open a rendering ticket which
replies that only official tags are supported
effects.
regards
Peter
Am 20.08.2014 um 14:46 schrieb André Pirard:
On 2014-08-15 16:31, Peter Wendorff wrote :
not a good idea IMHO.
1) what is the feature this tag should refer to? Consider a polygon that
is tagged as a building (building=yes) and a shop (shop=supermarked) and
a Walmart
On 2014-08-26 12:16, Pieren wrote :
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:36 PM,
André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes, this sentence
is misunderstood, and by many repliers apparently
On 2014-08-26 13:38, Christian Quest wrote :
André I think you missed a major thing about cartography (and
topography).
As OSM contributors, we're not cartographers but topographers... we
record topographic data.
Then cartographers use that data, make choices to have some objets of
THEIR
Peter Wendorff wrote :
Am 27.08.2014 um 17:49 schrieb André Pirard:
All the replies in this thread showed
absolutely no desire to join the
fight and make suggestions, just to disparage the idea.
I don't agree here.
But the way you proposed for this fight is no
On 2014-08-30 10:55, Dave Swarthout
wrote :
FWIW, I traveled extensively in New
Zealand a few years ago and there an "ablution block" (or
ablution area) is a place in a campground where one washes
things — dishes, clothing, etc. That
On 2014-09-13 17:02, Matthijs Melissen wrote :
On 13 September 2014 15:41, Satoshi IIDA nyamp...@gmail.com wrote:
But a few insists the bilingual RENDERING on osm.org or on other
alternative (apps or tiles or so).
This suggestion is in fact currently under discussion:
On 2014-12-13 16:23, Volker Schmidt
wrote :
On 13 December 2014 at 12:52, Zecke z...@saeuferleber.de
wrote:
Am
13.12.2014 12:44, schrieb Volker Schmidt:
I like watermills and I would like to be
Accuracy is indeed a problem.
An early OSM update I made was moving a borderline by 250m and put
a devotion site from an arrondissement to another.
Since then many corrections of more that 5 m, mainly due to user
being unaware of Bing's offset (at close zoom of
Oops, I forgot to finish a phrase...
I just checked a place where I had spotted a Bing offset before
and that disappeared. National aerial photos 2009 and 2012 are
offset by 2.8m. Bing is almost in the middle. But that's because
of a perspective effect. The
On 2014-12-23 20:01, christian.pietz...@googlemail.com wrote :
the problem with nodes is, that they are easily overssen.
It would be nice to have the possibility to show a warning when moving
an opject with high accuracy. The best examples are GPS reference
points like this:
On 2014-12-29 21:57, Florian Schäfer wrote :
Am 29.12.2014 um 21:48 schrieb Steve Doerr:
On 29/12/2014 20:36, Steve Doerr wrote:
On 29/12/2014 19:41, Guillaume Pratte wrote:
We are having a discussion on the wiki about the ‘varieté’ value
for the theatre:genre tag values:
On 2015-02-06 21:11, Jo wrote :
I think relation street applies to all the way
segments of the whole street with the same name (if in the same
municipality), but I didn't check to be honest.
Those kinds of relations are made to unsplit
ot allowed.
André.
On 11/02/2015 10:19 AM, André Pirard
wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone make sense out of this?
About: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nominatim/Special_
On 2015-02-12 05:28, Marc Gemis wrote :
The Nominatim FAQ [1] mentions 2 sources [2], [3] to report problems
and it also has the text You can also contact the developers on IRC
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IRC on channel #osm-nominatim.
a warning to the specs to at least spare people's time.
Cheers
André.
On 2015-02-11 00:19, André Pirard wrote :
Hi,
Can anyone make sense out of this?
About: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nominatim/Special_Phrases/FR
Two columns prepended to the table, second: Y=works, N=does not.
All
On 2015-01-27 09:51, Simone Saviolo wrote :
2015-01-26 15:28 GMT+01:00 Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com
mailto:doerr.step...@gmail.com:
On 26/01/2015 00:01, Simone Saviolo wrote:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/?w=patron_saint%3Ait%3D*+globalR
I swear, I would think that
On 2015-01-26 01:39, Friedrich Volkmann wrote :
On 25.01.2015 23:30, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
On 1/26/15, Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com wrote:
And I think it makes sense to define explicitly some things in the
documentation. Things like – use always (or use never) “Saint”:
“Saint Paul”
On 2015-01-25 17:29, Friedrich Volkmann wrote :
Probable all christian churches (buildings) and most chapels are dedicated
to patron saints.
E.g. the Basilica Sancti Petri (Saint Peter's Basilica) in Vatican City is
obviously dedicated to Sanctus Petrus (Saint Peter). As in this example, the
On 2015-02-01 16:45, Michał Brzozowski wrote :
Oddly enough, there is no info on the JOSM start page. I thought this
info gets updated automatically.
I did clear the cache, btw.
It's a plain Web page https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/StartupPage
and you should try to find why you don't see it.
On 2015-01-28 13:43, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote :
2015-01-27 11:42 GMT+01:00 Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com
mailto:simone.savi...@gmail.com:
On 2015-01-27 11:25, André Pirard wrote :
You should urgently warn the Vatican
https://www.google.be/search?q=site:va%20%22sainte
Hi,
Look at the Belgium relation
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/52411 and, while hiding the
subareas (in left pane), try to figure with that map the *administrative
tree* (regions, provinces) using the borderlines. You won't.
Now look at the subareas and something you will notice is that
Hi Fred,
I have time for one topic tonight.
On 2015-01-11 22:04, Frederik Ramm wrote :
Moreover, it is straightforward for a consumer program like OSM.org
to use the subareas to draw the outline of the regions, provinces,
etc. inside the country map or to do other things like measuring
On 2015-02-12 05:28, Marc Gemis wrote :
The Nominatim FAQ [1] mentions 2 sources [2], [3] to report problems
and it also has the text You can also contact the developers on IRC
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IRC on channel #osm-nominatim.
Hi,
Can anyone make sense out of this?
About: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nominatim/Special_Phrases/FR
Two columns prepended to the table, second: Y=works, N=does not.
All OSM queries are appended with the place name Dolembreux.
Seeing that #1 works, I add the alternate #2 and it doesn't.
Hi,
I think that one good way to promote OSM is to teach the general public
to make references to the main Map http://www.openstreetmap.org.
I know persons writing to 100s of people who could write things like the
rendezvous is here
On 2015-03-20 18:15, Volker Schmidt
wrote :
On 20 March 2015 at 17:48, André
Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
historic=1200 (for precise minds
On 2015-03-08 22:47, Philip Barnes wrote :
On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 14:47 +0100, André Pirard wrote:
Hi,
I've tried to no avail those keywords for what I suppose you
understand what I mean.
A man doing his business of delivering fuel with his lorry in addition
to his amenity=fuel.
All
Hi,
I've tried to no avail those keywords for what I suppose you understand
what I mean.
A man doing his business of delivering fuel with his lorry in addition
to his amenity=fuel.
All the results I've got were pipelines (of course;-) ), humanitarian,
and foreign countries as usually called
Title: Re: [Tagging] Loomio evaluation
Hi,
So, the conclusion of my Loomio test is that it does not let the
user choose which Google account it uses during account creation,
it uses the connected account and, despite the user cancels the
Login operation,
Goodjour Bonday,
Anyone
noticed this?
New icon next to Search GO
Or was I absent minded?
Amazed,
André.
___
Tagging mailing list
On 2015-03-03 17:02, Jake Wasserman wrote :
I'm trying to capture the accepted payment for each lane at a toll
booth. I haven't been able to find any other examples of this and I'm
hoping for some pointers here.
One thought is to use the :lanes suffix in conjunction with payment:*
So for
On 2015-03-23 01:18, Dave Swarthout wrote :
I'll second the notion that we need something better than the current
system. It is an anachronism!
My first look at Loomio was good, I was impressed, but my immediate
thought was, it'll never get accepted into OSM
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 5:57 AM,
On 2015-04-26 04:46, Clifford Snow
wrote :
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 12:44 PM,
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
Am 25.04.2015 um 02:04 schrieb johnw jo...@mac.com:
On 2015-04-27 09:59, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote :
2015-04-26 10:02 GMT+02:00 André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com:
Are we speaking of artists or of studios?
Can't artists perform in various places, e.g. at home?
After defining artist_studio
On 2015-05-10 15:33, Volker Schmidt wrote :
We do have here roads where access with motor vehicles is limited to
residents plus residents of the town, where the road is.
Example: http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/H5QZAcvCLQBwhbF4u2mq7w (zoom
in to read the details)
How do I tag such situation?
On 2015-05-11 09:27, Bryce Nesbitt
wrote :
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 11:31 PM,
Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com
wrote:
Also, it would break all current data consumers.
Hi,
Either opening_hours=on_appointment is missing or amenity=restaurant
lacks a tag or an explanation.
It is a restaurant indeed, but only hired for private group events like
marriages.
It is not an amenity=community_centre but it's also what you call a
craft=caterer.
How do I map that?
On 11.05.2015 22:40, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
Is there any good reason to avoid changing existing surface=brick to
surface=bricks?
Yes. Not having to count and tag the number of bricks ;-)
brick = the material of which such blocks are made
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/brick?s=t
On 2015-05-15 10:09, Robin `ypid` Schneider wrote :
On 14.05.2015 23:17, André Pirard wrote:
On 2015-05-13 16:49, Robin `ypid` Schneider wrote :
Hi
This can already be done, no problem. It is even described on the key page
[1].
Just search for on appointment.
Typical of that page, you
On 2015-05-16 01:40, Frederik Ramm wrote :
Hi,
On 05/16/2015 12:03 AM, pmailkeey . wrote:
I don't know whether this has been discussed or even mooted before...
Often.
Tagging for the renderer is natural. Mappers, especially newbies will be
disappointed their pet new feature they've just
On 2015-05-16 20:31, Marc Gemis wrote :
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 5:01 AM, André Pirard
a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2015-05-16 01:40, Frederik Ramm wrote :
Thing is, there is no THE map. There's tons of maps in various colour
schemes
Hi,
We know that addr:housenumber
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr=* can be tagged on nodes
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#How_to_map_addresses and
that it's very convenient.
A problem in tagging the number on a node *instead* of on an area is
that someone making a nice
On 2015-05-21 01:51, pmailkeey . wrote :
On 20 May 2015 at 14:10, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We know that addr:housenumber
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr=* can be tagged on
nodes
http
On 2015-05-20 19:26, Andreas Goss wrote :
That is the same number both on a node (once) and on the way/relation
*that this node belongs to* (once)?
Do you mean area when you say way? I think if a building has the
address then you should not have a node for just the address. If it's
a
On 2015-06-08 13:29, Richard wrote :
Hi,
quite often there are node-type objects on bridges or in tunnels.
What to do with them? Tunnel or bridge tags are dfined only for
ways.
In my mind:
bridges are piece of concrete below the roads (tarmac) and
On 2015-06-20 14:46, Ruben Maes wrote :
After the proposal Donation was rejected, I tried to address the
issues that were raised in a new proposal using
healthcare=blood_donation:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Blood_donation_2
You are of course welcome to point out
Hi,
For what Marc describes, I've been recommended this
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344739636 (it's in Belgium).
building
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building?uselang=en-US yes
amenity http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity?uselang=en-US
events_venue
Hi,
An OSM element is normally made of one physical object tag and a
number of tags describing the attributes of that object or of the other
attributes (such as (fictitious example)
building:tower:antenna:gsm=yes). This applies to areas and nodes.
Some people prefer to tag the attributes to a
On 2015-06-30 14:04, Marc Gemis wrote :
Everything between quotes is considered a comment, and can contain
values in the local language (e.g 123 nach␣Vereinbarung
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/opening_hours=%22nach%20Vereinbarung%22
--
German for by appointment)
IMHO this means
On 2015-06-22 23:20, Holger Jeromin wrote :
Ruben Maes ruben.mae...@gmail.com Wrote in message:
After the proposal Donation was rejected, I tried to address the
issues that were raised in a new proposal using
healthcare=blood_donation:
On 25 May 2015 at 13:18, Thorsten Alge li...@thorsten-alge.de wrote:
Since wikidata will be the center of all Wikimedia wikis it might be
better to link to wikidata items instead of wikipedia article. Thats
why I wonder what you think of deprecating the wikipedia tags (NOT
DELETING any of
On 2015-05-25 15:29, Marc Gemis wrote :
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 3:08 PM, André Pirard
a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
I already replied that I wonder what's the idea behind that
enforcement. Why wouldn't Wikidata be used also rather than
instead
On 2015-05-23 14:17, Hans De Kryger
wrote :
How's this
going? Any decisions?
https://www.loomio.org/d/gW9avzUK/replace-tagging-mailling-list-with-loomio
Is that an opinion?
I have
On 2015-05-21 11:33, Marc Gemis wrote :
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:13 AM, André Pirard
a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Info is routinely in two places, e.g. building and
associatedStreet, to cope with software or people that do not
support one
On 2015-05-21 12:24, pmailkeey . wrote
:
On 21 May 2015 at 10:13, André Pirard
a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2015-05-21 01:51, pmailkeey . wrote
101 - 200 of 311 matches
Mail list logo
