Re: [Tagging] [tagging] Amenity=Ufficio_Pubblico

2014-12-15 17:03 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > > 2014-12-15 15:42 GMT+01:00 sabas88 : >> >> Hi, >> I know we have an unusual amount of bureaucracy in Italy, but we may not >> need a custom tag for it >> > > > from my experience it

Re: [Tagging] [tagging] Amenity=Ufficio_Pubblico

2014-12-15 15:52 GMT+01:00 Martin Vonwald : > > > > 2014-12-15 15:42 GMT+01:00 sabas88 : >> >> I know we have an unusual amount of bureaucracy in Italy, but we may not >> need a custom tag for it >> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:am

Re: [Tagging] [tagging] Amenity=Ufficio_Pubblico

2014-12-15 15:31 GMT+01:00 Simone Savio : > > Hi propose > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ufficio_pubblico > > > becaus I want create a specific tag for public institutions in It

Re: [Tagging] Problems with historic=tomb

2014-10-16 8:33 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny : > It seems that are serious problems with this tag, is there somebody > interested in > this topic who want to make a better proposal? > > (1) This tag can not be used on the same object as > historic=archaeological_site - > despite the fact that many

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water tap

2014-10-10 19:05 GMT+02:00 Kotya Karapetyan : > Dear all, > > I would hereby like to propose a new value for the man_made tag: > > man_made=water_tap > > The proposal page is: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/water_tap > Hi, I use amenity=drinking_water + drinkable=no Now I

Re: [Tagging] University accommodation (was Re: Future proposal - RFC - amenity=dormitory)

On 19 Sep 2014 16:54, "Tobias Knerr" wrote: > > On 19.09.2014 14:22 Dan S wrote: > > for buildings: building=residential + residential=university + operator=* > > OR > > for sites: landuse=residential + residential=university + operator=* > > > > Note that the same scheme seems to me

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Port and terminals

2014-07-08 11:44 GMT+02:00 Andreas Goss : > We could use a single polygon per terminal tagged as in the proposal >> (similar to other landuse types) if we need to go in detail. If needed >> using also multiple values (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semicolon) >> > > If you read the page you w

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Port and terminals

2014-07-08 9:37 GMT+02:00 Malcolm Herring : > Most ports handle many different types of cargoes, so a single value is > insufficient. It would be better to tag the individual terminal objects > within a port with a type rather than assign a type to the port object. > > > We could use a single poly

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Port and terminals

Dear all, I edited the two proposals as required. Regarding the intermodal_terminal, I added a definition and some pictures. Considering the port proposal, I made more extensive changes to make it more similar to other tags, as suggested by Martin. Mainly the idea is to have categories in the port

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Port and terminals

2014-07-07 17:47 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > 2014-07-07 17:21 GMT+02:00 sabas88 : > > As I explained in the talk page previously, I would like to stay with roro >> as a value, because it's more common in the usage. > > > > I still believe you should e

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Port and terminals

2014-07-07 17:09 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > 2014-07-05 14:02 GMT+02:00 sabas88 : > > >> For port proposal and voting page see >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Dport >> >> > > In this case there is ha

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Port and terminals

2014-07-07 16:50 GMT+02:00 Andreas Goss : > This proposal needs EXAMPLES, EXAMPLES and more EXAMPLES!!! > Hi Andreas, thanks for the email.. I will try to follow your suggestion :-) > > I would like to see some examples that show everything in one picture: > habour, ports, port authority bounda

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Port and terminals

2014-07-06 12:48 GMT+02:00 Malcolm Herring : > On 06/07/2014 10:45, sabas88 wrote: > >> Let me know how I can edit / disambiguate. >> >> The important distinction is that a port is an administrative boundary > (which may have several disjunct areas) whereas harbours,

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Port and terminals

2014-07-06 9:48 GMT+02:00 Malcolm Herring : > On 06/07/2014 08:24, nounours77 wrote: > >> => So this would imply that "port" is a individual facility inside a >> "harbour". >> > In fact it is the other way round. A port my contain one or more harbours. > (In turn, a harbour may contain zero or mor

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Port and terminals

Dear all, after almost six months from the original proposal, now I would like to ask you to vote these two new tags. Accepting the tag landuse=port would improve the detailed tagging of port areas, for example to tell apart container terminals (easily distinguishable from satellite imagery) from

Re: [Tagging] Pipeline bridges

If we consider aqueducts http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176520234#map=18/44.45802/8.97848 http://www.acquedottogenova.altervista.org/images/01-primo%20itinerario/46_sifone%20geirato.jpg http://www.oruko.altervista.org/images/curiosita-ponti/11b-sifone%20geirato.jpg Otherwise here's a bridge/gas

Re: [Tagging] admin_level on nodes: wiki vs practice

On 11 May 2014 06:32, "Fernando Trebien" wrote: > > Hm I've looked up a few other cities (Hamburg, Munich, Cologne, Lyon, > Marseille, Rotterdam, Zurich, Manchester, Birmingham, Salzburg, > Aarhus) and they do not have an admin_level tag on the place=* node. > At the same time, I found some other

Re: [Tagging] natural=cloud

On 1 Apr 2014 19:08, "Pierre Knobel" wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm new on this mailing list, but I spend a few months already on the talk-fr list and I've been mapping for a while longer. > > I just wanted to mention a new tag I created yesterday: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dclou

Re: [Tagging] Study area

2014-02-27 12:06 GMT+01:00 Pieren : > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:56 AM, sabas88 wrote: > > > Because it's overcrowded > > Today, it's less than shop ... > > > and office should suit better, as coworking are > > basically and most of the time offices

Re: [Tagging] Study area

2014-02-27 10:37 GMT+01:00 Dave Swarthout : > @Stephan: I like the coworking_space idea. It certainly fits the practice > at Punspace. > > >>IMO if we have the opportunity we shouldn't use amenity key.<< > > @Stefano: Why do you think we should not use the amenity key? > Because it's overcrowded

Re: [Tagging] Study area

2014-02-27 8:45 GMT+01:00 Stephan Knauss : > On 27.02.2014 01:48, Dave Swarthout wrote: > >> @Martin, I'm not sure about the status of the books but that's not the >> prominent feature of this place. I will go back for more details later >> but it is definitely not a library. >> @Stephan - neither

Re: [Tagging] Help me locate this tag checking website.

2014-02-21 20:43 GMT+01:00 Dave F. : > Hi > > I'm unable to remember the name or find the location of a tag checking web > page. > > It was a slippy map of mapnik rendering that had a single line text box > into which you could type a key, value or both & after a search would > display an icon at

Re: [Tagging] How to tag a public works facility ?

2014-02-19 22:04 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > depot will probably still fit: there are repair depots, storage depots etc. > > Maybe there c > > http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logistics_center > > > the landuse would be industrial I guess. > > Why use landuse=industrial? Because it's rendere

Re: [Tagging] How to tag a public works facility ?

2014-02-19 18:20 GMT+01:00 Pieren : > > > Btw, use simply "depot=*" instead of "depot:type=*". I don't > understand this recent trend to add a ":type" suffix in subtags. It > was not the case in the past (e.g. "building=*", "wood=*", > "traffic_signals=*", etc, etc, etc) > > Simply because there's

Re: [Tagging] How to tag a public works facility ?

2014-02-19 17:32 GMT+01:00 Dan S : > Any reasons not to use landuse=depot? Besides the sparsity of its wiki > page... > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Ddepot > 428 instances in taginfo > > +1 But using depot:type=* instead of type=* (as I suggested in http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.co

[Tagging] [RFC] Classification for ports and inland terminals

Dear all, after the discussion regarding the seamark tagging I wanted to start some proposals to have a consensus on a general way of tagging marine facilities (and hopefully get them rendered to solve incorrect tagging for the renderer :-) [1]). With this proposal I wanted to give a unique tag to

Re: [Tagging] OpenSeaMap tagging - seamark-prefix was Re: [Imports] IENC of the German WSV

2013/12/11 Malcolm Herring > We (OpenSeaMap) are open to suggestions on this. The harbour project has > recently been re-started after a hiatus of several years. As we are > building a separate database to contain imports from various public harbour > data sources. These harbour objects only requ

Re: [Tagging] tag for co-working spaces

2013/11/25 Severin MENARD > Hi, > > Seems this does not exist yet. > Here is the taginfo situation > http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=working_space#values > > What about a office=co_working_space or office=co-working_space? > > Hi, I'd prefer some

Re: [Tagging] Pre-proposal: Newsagent / Kiosk / Tobacco / TIcket shop

2013/11/3 Martin Koppenhoefer > > 2013/11/3 Matthijs Melissen > >> Do these kind of shops also exist in other countries, and how are they >> referred to? Which of the products that I listed do they sell? >> > > > There is surely some overlap between countries, but there are also country > specif

Re: [Tagging] tourism=guest_house or tourism=bed_and_breakfast ?

2013/10/17 Pieren > Could someone explain the difference between "tourism=guest_house" and > "tourism=bed_and_breakfast" ? > Both are suggested here: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house > but only "guest_house" is really documented in the wiki. > > In taginfo, we find 5

Re: [Tagging] Ferry frequency

Duration is also important and currently used by OSRM (although not on relations yet), like http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/176323421 Cheers, Stefano ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagg

[Tagging] Intermodal transport

Hello, I would like to start a discussion related to intermodal transport and its facilities, and I drafted a page[0] with some links in it. A tagging system should be proposed also considering the maritime tagging (OpenSeaMap), or extending it to deal with inland facilities. As an example, I saw

[Tagging] Luncheon Vouchers

Hello, I wanted to add information on some restaurants / bars to indicate if they accept luncheon vouchers (meal vouchers), but I didn't find anything. These vouchers are given by work employers to be used for lunch payments. I was looking at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Payment which I thin

Re: [Tagging] water parks and swimming pools

There's also an attraction=water_slide[0], it isn't rendered in the current stylesheet but it's the correct tag to use :) I'm respondible for some swimming pools multipolygons, the explaination is that in water parks there are these big water areas in which you can walk or swim, but there are some

Re: [Tagging] Ferry lines, ways or relations?

This discussion already took place some months ago.. Since then I saw a lot of changes after I edited initially some Italian lines.. 2012/9/5 Janko Mihelić > I opened an issue on OSRM-s Github page: > > https://github.com/DennisOSRM/Project-OSRM/issues/402 https://github.com/DennisOSRM/Project

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - natural=bare_rock

2012/7/2 Johan Jönsson > This is an old proposal that have been discussed before. It seem to be in > use > according to tag watch, so I have been urged to make this official. > > There are also similar tags in use and others proposed but that doesn´t > mean > this one could be approved. > > http:

[Tagging] Wholesale, key without proposal?

Hi, I saw this [0] page which describes a feature with ~30 uses, created on June 20th. Some months ago, I made this[1] proposal for a new shop value, which has now 80 occurrences. Should I mark one of the two pages in some way? What's the correct one? Regards, Stefano [0]http://wiki.openstreetma

Re: [Tagging] Ferry routes, what's the correct approach?

2012/6/3 Philip Barnes > [cut] > Dover-Calais does seem to work well, you may get some ideas there. > > http://map.project-osrm.org/xR > > Thanks, seems similar to how I made the routes in Genoa, we'll see at the next OSRM update how it behaves... I don't understand why way 14271003 (the main rou

[Tagging] Ferry routes, what's the correct approach?

Hi, I started discussing in the local list about the approach in tagging ferry routes. The wiki page [0] seems a little bit unclear, leaving two approaches: -normal way between harbours -relation like a normal road. I tried to follow the relation approach like I saw in other seas, but I cannot und

[Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Soccer variants

Hi all, I made a proposal for a new soccer=* tag to describe which variant is played on a field. Currently there isn't a way to tell if a soccer field is regular-sized (on which it's played the regular soccer) or it's a simple field traced in a church backyard for example. http://wiki.openstreetma

Re: [Tagging] Count of urinals

2012/5/26 Shu Higashi > Hi, > > I was asked by a woman if she can map the count of urinals (or > something other appropriate name in english?) in a toilet. > Because it is very important for women to count their waiting time. > So I'd like to propose a tag to count the urials. > > For example: >

Re: [Tagging] Geology and landcover - Building an extension

2012/5/23 Martin Koppenhoefer > 2012/5/23 sabas88 : > > What about building a proposal to extend landcover=* tag to meet FAO's > > system? > > > I think if you wanted to implement the FAO system you would need more > than one additional tag, so I suggest to make

Re: [Tagging] sidewalks and tagging for the renderer

2012/4/10 Martin Koppenhoefer > I am coming back to a topic we had some time ago: sidewalks. > > According to this page > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk > > sidewalks should be tagged with > highway=footway > footway=sidewalk > > While I agree that for complex situation

Re: [Tagging] any tag you like, but why create parallel systems for established tags? DCGIS

Il giorno 10/mar/2012 15:25, "Josh Doe" ha scritto: > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > Looking at the key name and values this looks like the date when the > > external database included the object in their system. Why on earth > > should we keep track of this i

Re: [Tagging] gym as an amenity value

Il giorno 10/mar/2012 06:49, "Clifford Snow" ha scritto: >> >> To me fitness centers are more related to health than leisure. I'd prefer to use the tag "amenity" instead. > > Thoughts? I feel like I'm in prison when I go to the gym[0]… > > Clifford Stefano [0] wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pri

Re: [Tagging] Tag approval process or its absence (was: Voting for Relation type=waterway)

2012/2/21 Frederik Ramm > > I don't think that a tagging style that works best in Europe will > automatically also be the one that works best in South America. Any attempt > to force everyone to use the same style will automatically make the map > *less* good in some places. I think that it is on

Re: [Tagging] Tag approval process or its absence (was: Voting for Relation type=waterway)

That's some kind of consideration, like the one I proposed some time ago, about building a clean tagging scheme, but has led to a discussion about another topic and died. My +1 will always go to cleaning. Cheers, Stefano ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@

Re: [Tagging] tagging of "ele" / elevation data e.g. in the context of towers

2012/2/20 Martin Koppenhoefer > On the German ML we are currently discussing how to applicate "ele" to > towers (and similar situations). There is consensus that the key > "height" is describing the height of the structure from the ground to > the top. There is also consensus to tag elevation dat

Re: [Tagging] Public airport multipolygon?

2012/1/30 Josh Doe > > I guess you can't, at least not now. That's one issue with the > free-form tagging system we use. Sooner or later we'll have to develop > a process to deprecate tags, change tags, etc. Perhaps we should start > a separate thread and discuss how this process could work. +1

Re: [Tagging] When should a name:* translation be used?

2012/1/30 Nathan Edgars II > >> >> It is quite frequent that the names of the more famous places get >> translated into different languages. I don't speak Vietnamese, but >> this looks like nothing particularily strange to me. If you need a >> reason to keep it: I guess the Vietnamese speaking pe

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Mapping guidelines

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/highway ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Health and other stories

2012/1/11 Serge Wroclawski > parking=* requires amenity=parking. > > That seems entirely redundant to me, and if I were king, I'd strip out > amenity=parking. > (the whole parking scheme needs re-design to integrate the various > schemes currently in place). > > - Serge This should be part of r

Re: [Tagging] Amenity parking

2012/1/11 Erik Johansson > I tag all parking spaces as amenity=parking, even though you have to > rent a place by the month. I'm guessing this is wrong? But this is how > most people do it. I'd like a subkey for the landuse=road :P ___ Tagging mailing

Re: [Tagging] Health and other stories

2012/1/11 Michael Krämer > To be honest I haven't really thought about the > difference between until this thread came up... That's a problem for various non-native speakers (me included eheh) This should be an opportunity to make some changes in syntax and semantics [1] of OSM. We should sta

Re: [Tagging] Health and other stories

2012/1/11 Frederik Ramm > > I find it a bit harsh that you complain about amenity=dentist when others > languish in an amenity=prison. > I laughed hard, I didn't noticed it :D 2012/1/11 Martin Koppenhoefer > > nobody stops you from using other keys then "amenity", some people > already do it

[Tagging] Health and other stories

Hi list, I want to suggest a topic of discussion not often considered: planning a more rational tagging system to be applied onto the existing data and for the future. (OK, it's flame time! :D) For instance the discussion could start with a simple case: healthcare. Now the health facilities are ta

Re: [Tagging] additional barrier type?

2011/12/1 Richard Welty > while out mapping today, i encountered a barrier type that doesn't have a > suitable > tag in the wiki: > > barrier=guardrail > > in the specific case, a road leading to an abandoned bridge has had a > guardrail > barrier placed across the road to keep vehicular traffic

Re: [Tagging] railways, subway stations and train stations

I suggested before to make subway into public_transport, so in this case it simply will be an unique area with both railway=* and public_transport=* tags :) 2011/9/22 Chris Dombroski > On Thursday, September 22, 2011 07:54:29 AM sabas88 wrote: > > > How is someone to determine wheth

Re: [Tagging] railways, subway stations and train stations

> > > How is someone to determine whether something is a railway=station or a > railway=subway_station? If it's on a metro (subway) line it's a subway_station, else if it's on a train line it's a station. In these cases you'd use layer=* Stefano ___ Tagg

Re: [Tagging] railways, subway stations and train stations

If it's public_transport=subway, IMHO there should be a station=yes as a subtag ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=wholesale (was cash_and_carry)

After some suggestions, I came with a new formalization suggested by two users. It's used in taginfo, and it needs a more specific key also already in use. Perhaps it's ready also to start voting, comment it. Regards, Stefano / sarchittuorg ___ Tagging m

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=cash_and_carry

Hi there, I made a proposal for a cash and carry shop tag. Cash and carry are big wholesale dealers ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cash_and_carry_%28wholesale%29) You can find the proposal page here http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/shop%3Dcash_and_carry Stefano sarchittuorg ___