Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-25 Thread John Willis



 On May 25, 2015, at 6:53 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 
 Am 24.05.2015 um 14:36 schrieb John Willis jo...@mac.com:
 
 I always thought a cascade is a series of waterfalls connected together.
 
 
 I thought it was a word for a single waterfall as well...

The water careened off the cliff.
The car careened off the cliff

The error cascaded through the computers
The water cascaded off the rocks,

People who would refer to a singular waterfall as a cascade are incorrect. 

People who refer to the action of the water (it cascaded down the cliff) are 
not so far off, but it would not be referred to as a cascade.

But people muddy the meaning with incorrect usage.

The example pic I linked to is different than all the waterfalls I have seen.

 
 Also - saying a waterfall is a reflecting pool is very disingenuous - it's 
 not that it reflects - it's *what* it reflects - usually some kind of 
 scenery or famous architecture.
 
 
 in particular, a waterfall is not a pool. Reflection of light is what it 
 makes look interesting (glitter)

And they make rainbows and icicles too.

J
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-25 Thread Richard
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:53:48PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:




  Am 24.05.2015 um 14:36 schrieb John Willis jo...@mac.com:
 
  I always thought a cascade is a series of waterfalls connected together.


 I thought it was a word for a single waterfall as well...

in some languages a cascade is any series of things, be it
electronic switches in circuits or waterfalls - even in English
as I have just noticed from reading wiktionary:

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cascade

So cascade would be a true weasel tag.

Richard

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer




 Am 25.05.2015 um 13:37 schrieb Richard ricoz@gmail.com:
 
 
 in some languages a cascade is any series of things, be it
 electronic switches in circuits or waterfalls - even in English
 as I have just noticed from reading wiktionary:
 
 http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cascade
 
 So cascade would be a true weasel tag.


yes, it is typical for words to have different meanings in different contexts, 
but water=cascade will be much less a weasel than the word cascade alone 

cheers 
Martin 
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-25 Thread Richard
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 01:46:18PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:

  So cascade would be a true weasel tag.
 
 
 yes, it is typical for words to have different meanings in different 
 contexts, but water=cascade will be much less a weasel than the word cascade 
 alone 

still enough of a weasel word.

still weasel enough. Could be a single waterfall, a series of them or this:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moldau-Kaskade

Richard

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-05-25 17:11 GMT+02:00 Richard ricoz@gmail.com:

 [water=cascade] still weasel enough. Could be a single waterfall, a series
 of them or this:
 http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moldau-Kaskade




fountain_type=cascade should make the object clear
if you'd want to be more specific:
start_date=1500-1600   -- https://www.pinterest.com/pin/305189312221270405/

start_date=1992 might look like this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fountains_in_Paris#/media/File:Parc_Andr%C3%A9_Citroen_-_Ballon_%283%29.JPG

cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-24 Thread John Willis
I always thought a cascade is a series of waterfalls connected together. 

Wether that is natural or artificial, I'm not sure there's a distinction. 

http://www.tripadvisor.com/MobileViewPhoto-g298182-d1311890-i131738347-Ryuzu_Waterfall-Nikko_Tochigi_Prefecture_Kanto.html

I've visited a lot of waterfalls, and all of them go from top to bottom in a 
single fall - a water fall

The one linked to is referred to by many as a cascade - because it is made of 
many little waterfalls stuck together sliding over rocks.

This is further muddied because cascade is a verb - and streams and rough 
rivers cascade through a steep canyon. 

Also - saying a waterfall is a reflecting pool is very disingenuous - it's not 
that it reflects - it's *what* it reflects - usually some kind of scenery or 
famous architecture. The smooth calm waters offer views of surrounding trees, 
buildings and in some cases mountains - but are made and constructed for this 
purpose (as opposed to natural lakes, such as the ones around my Fuji which 
naturally reflect the mountain, offing interesting pictures). 

Many city parks offer them to reflect the view of the buildings - such as the 
big pool in the national mall in Washington, D.C.  

J

Sent from my iPhone

 On May 24, 2015, at 3:45 AM, pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com wrote:
 
 
 
 On 23 May 2015 at 11:09, Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 03:54:57PM +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
  On 22 May 2015 at 15:29, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote:
   I am uncomfortable with cascade - in several languages it
   means waterfall so there is considerable potential for
   confusion.
  
   I agree. A cascade is a waterfall in American English.
 
 
 Is that relevant ? ;) Is there really a problem with Americans relearning 
 what words mean ?
 
 Actually, Merriam-Webster seems to have it right - even in American !: a 
 small, steep waterfall; especially : one that is part of a series of 
 waterfalls 
 
 
 Although this points to an American cascades as being one part of an English 
 cascade ! America uses 'waterfall' too - it seems 'cascade' is agreeable even 
 if not realised!
 
 -- 
 Mike.
 @millomweb - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland
 via the area's premier website - 
 
 currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property  
 pets
 
 TCs
 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-24 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer




 Am 24.05.2015 um 14:36 schrieb John Willis jo...@mac.com:
 
 I always thought a cascade is a series of waterfalls connected together. 


I thought it was a word for a single waterfall as well...


 
 Also - saying a waterfall is a reflecting pool is very disingenuous - it's 
 not that it reflects - it's *what* it reflects - usually some kind of 
 scenery or famous architecture.


in particular, a waterfall is not a pool. Reflection of light is what it makes 
look interesting (glitter)

cheers 
Martin 
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-24 Thread pmailkeey .
On 24 May 2015 at 22:53, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:





  Am 24.05.2015 um 14:36 schrieb John Willis jo...@mac.com:
 
  I always thought a cascade is a series of waterfalls connected together.


 I thought it was a word for a single waterfall as well...


Only where the water hits other things on the way down causing the water to
cascade.

-- 
Mike.
@millomweb https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction -
For all your info on Millom and South Copeland
via *the area's premier website - *

*currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property
 pets*

TCs https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-23 Thread Richard Z.
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 03:54:57PM +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
 On 22 May 2015 at 15:29, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote:
  I am uncomfortable with cascade - in several languages it
  means waterfall so there is considerable potential for
  confusion.
 
  I agree. A cascade is a waterfall in American English.
 
 How, then would you describe:
 
 
 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Water_Feature_in_Cabot_Place,_Canary_Wharf_%282%29_-_geograph.org.uk_-_1472986.jpg

it could be a weir and waterfall
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Waterfalls#Artificial_waterfalls

or some kind of playground

Richard

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-23 Thread pmailkeey .
On 23 May 2015 at 11:09, Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 03:54:57PM +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
  On 22 May 2015 at 15:29, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote:
   I am uncomfortable with cascade - in several languages it
   means waterfall so there is considerable potential for
   confusion.
  
   I agree. A cascade is a waterfall in American English.
 


Is that relevant ? ;) Is there really a problem with Americans relearning
what words mean ?

Actually, Merriam-Webster seems to have it right - even in American !: a
small, steep waterfall; *especially* : one that is part of a series of
waterfalls


Although this points to an American cascades as being one part of an
English cascade ! America uses 'waterfall' too - it seems 'cascade' is
agreeable even if not realised!

-- 
Mike.
@millomweb https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction -
For all your info on Millom and South Copeland
via *the area's premier website - *

*currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property
 pets*

TCs https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-22 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer




 Am 22.05.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
 
 Cascades, by their very nature, are not suitable for reflecting as the
 water is agitated.


maybe this is a language issue, I would have thought they would reflect anyway 
but you wouldn't see a clear picture (I agree that reflection_pool is not the 
right term nonetheless, nor does the wiki suggest so)


 
 Maybe water=cascade could be the right fit.
 
 Probably, but I'd like more opinions; and other options - cascades are
 just one example.


what are the other examples? We cannot propose tags if you don't say what you 
want to tag ;-)


cheers 
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-22 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 15 May 2015 at 12:25, pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com wrote:

 'Pond' seems to fit the bill:

No, it does not.

-- 
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-22 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 15 May 2015 at 16:40, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:

 Wiki suggests natural=water + water=reflecting_pool:

Cascades, by their very nature, are not suitable for reflecting as the
water is agitated. There may also be no horizontal surface to speak
of.

 Maybe water=cascade could be the right fit.

Probably, but I'd like more opinions; and other options - cascades are
just one example.

-- 
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-22 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 22 May 2015 at 12:03, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:

 what are the other examples? We cannot propose tags if you don't say what you 
 want to tag ;-)

man-made, ornamental water features, which are not fountains

These might be cascades, rills, reflecting-pools, rain-chains, moats, etc.

We might, for example, have:

   natural=water
   water=cascde

etc. - but not:

   water=fountain

as we already have

   amenity=fountain

or we could have:

   amenity=cascade



-- 
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-22 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer




 Am 22.05.2015 um 13:35 schrieb Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
 
 These might be cascades, rills, reflecting-pools, rain-chains, moats, etc.
 
 We might, for example, have:
 
   natural=water
   water=cascde
 
 etc. - but not:
 
   water=fountain
 
 as we already have
 
   amenity=fountain
 
 or we could have:
 
   amenity=cascade


where's the problem then? add natural =water to all water areas and specify 
further with water=* (cascade, rill, rain-chain, ...)
As we have seen, the current wiki docu doesn't detail these kind of features so 
feel free to propose an addition

cheers 
Martin 
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-22 Thread Richard Z.
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 09:26:34AM -0500, John F. Eldredge wrote:
 The water feature we are talking about here is an artificial waterfall,
 usually pump-driven.

in that case it might be better to either use normal waterfall tagging 
   node with waterway=waterfall+ way waterway=weir, 
   possibly also waterway=dam and man_made=yes
or a distinct tag which is not so easy to confuse as synonymous.

Richard

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-22 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 22 May 2015 at 15:29, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote:
 I am uncomfortable with cascade - in several languages it
 means waterfall so there is considerable potential for
 confusion.

 I agree. A cascade is a waterfall in American English.

How, then would you describe:


https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Water_Feature_in_Cabot_Place,_Canary_Wharf_%282%29_-_geograph.org.uk_-_1472986.jpg
?

-- 
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-22 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 22 May 2015 at 15:54, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:

 How, then would you describe:

Or these:

   
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Site_of_Priory_Mill_-_geograph.org.uk_-_288573.jpg

   
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Luxury_apartments,_Dickens_Heath_Village,_Solihull_-_geograph.org.uk_-_1720292.jpg

   
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CASCADING_FOUNTAIN,_FROM_FRONT,_CLOSER_-_Harold_Lloyd_Estate,_Beverly_Hills,_Los_Angeles_County,_CA_HABS_CAL,19-BEVHI,2-18.tif

   https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:20070616_Crown_Fountain_%287%29.JPG


-- 
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-22 Thread John F. Eldredge
The water feature we are talking about here is an artificial waterfall, 
usually pump-driven.




On May 22, 2015 9:19:44 AM Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com wrote:


On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:00:30PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:




  Am 22.05.2015 um 13:35 schrieb Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
 
  These might be cascades, rills, reflecting-pools, rain-chains, moats, etc.
 
  We might, for example, have:
 
natural=water
water=cascde
 
  etc. - but not:
 
water=fountain
 
  as we already have
 
amenity=fountain
 
  or we could have:
 
amenity=cascade

I am uncomfortable with cascade - in several languages it
means waterfall so there is considerable potential for
confusion.

Richard

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging




___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-22 Thread Dave Swarthout
I am uncomfortable with cascade - in several languages it
means waterfall so there is considerable potential for
confusion.

I agree. A cascade is a waterfall in American English.

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:00:30PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
 
 
 
 
   Am 22.05.2015 um 13:35 schrieb Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk
 :
  
   These might be cascades, rills, reflecting-pools, rain-chains, moats,
 etc.
  
   We might, for example, have:
  
 natural=water
 water=cascde
  
   etc. - but not:
  
 water=fountain
  
   as we already have
  
 amenity=fountain
  
   or we could have:
  
 amenity=cascade

 I am uncomfortable with cascade - in several languages it
 means waterfall so there is considerable potential for
 confusion.

 Richard

 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging




-- 
Dave Swarthout
Homer, Alaska
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-22 Thread Richard Z.
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:00:30PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
 
 
 
 
  Am 22.05.2015 um 13:35 schrieb Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
  
  These might be cascades, rills, reflecting-pools, rain-chains, moats, etc.
  
  We might, for example, have:
  
natural=water
water=cascde
  
  etc. - but not:
  
water=fountain
  
  as we already have
  
amenity=fountain
  
  or we could have:
  
amenity=cascade

I am uncomfortable with cascade - in several languages it
means waterfall so there is considerable potential for 
confusion.

Richard

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-22 Thread Dave Swarthout
How about fountain_cascade or waterfall_artificial?

It's a tricky proposition.

On Friday, May 22, 2015, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:

 On 22 May 2015 at 15:54, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk
 javascript:; wrote:

  How, then would you describe:

 Or these:


 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Site_of_Priory_Mill_-_geograph.org.uk_-_288573.jpg


 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Luxury_apartments,_Dickens_Heath_Village,_Solihull_-_geograph.org.uk_-_1720292.jpg


 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CASCADING_FOUNTAIN,_FROM_FRONT,_CLOSER_-_Harold_Lloyd_Estate,_Beverly_Hills,_Los_Angeles_County,_CA_HABS_CAL,19-BEVHI,2-18.tif


 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:20070616_Crown_Fountain_%287%29.JPG


 --
 Andy Mabbett
 @pigsonthewing
 http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org javascript:;
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging



-- 
Dave Swarthout
Homer, Alaska
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-15 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
A lot of those end up as natural=water.  I suppose man_made=yes could be
added.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


[Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-15 Thread Andy Mabbett
How should we tag man=made, ornamental water features, which are not
fountains? For example, a cascade?

The wiki pages at:

   http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Water

   http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfountain

are of little help in this regard.

-- 
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-15 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-05-15 8:48 GMT+02:00 Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:

 How should we tag man=made, ornamental water features, which are not
 fountains? For example, a cascade?





fountains also require a natural=water for the effective water areas. See
here: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/705

A cascade could be waterway=cascade? Or is it a waterfall?

For areas you can maybe find something here (reflection_pool?) or invent
something new along these classes:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Water_details

I've recently mapped this as (one) fountain, although there isn't any water
sputtering more than 10 cm (I'd call this a cascade), maybe also your
ornamental water features can be considered fountains? Do you have a
picture?
[image: Inline-Bild 1]

Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-15 Thread pmailkeey .
'Pond' seems to fit the bill: OED: A small body of still water of
artificial formation, made either by excavating a hollow in the ground or
by embanking and damming up a watercourse in a natural hollow.

On 15 May 2015 at 12:13, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 15/05/2015 4:55 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:

 A lot of those end up as natural=water.  I suppose man_made=yes could be
 added.


 The 'Pool of Reflection' Sydney is simply tagged
 natural=water
 name=Pool of Reflection

 Way: 182625202

 That is an ornamental memorial pool. Flat.

 I've added a just cascade ..
 natural=water
 name=Fig Grove

 It would be rendered .. but nothing special to mark it as a cascade.
  Rivers and streams get directional arrows .. but then cascades may be
 confused with them.
 May be an arrow with a flattened point would do.. but you'll need some tag
 for it and a wiki page.








 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging




-- 
Mike.
@millomweb https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction -
For all your info on Millom and South Copeland
via *the area's premier website - *

*currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property
 pets*

TCs https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-15 Thread Warin

On 15/05/2015 4:55 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
A lot of those end up as natural=water.  I suppose man_made=yes could 
be added.




The 'Pool of Reflection' Sydney is simply tagged
natural=water
name=Pool of Reflection

Way: 182625202

That is an ornamental memorial pool. Flat.

I've added a just cascade ..
natural=water
name=Fig Grove

It would be rendered .. but nothing special to mark it as a cascade.
 Rivers and streams get directional arrows .. but then cascades may be 
confused with them.
May be an arrow with a flattened point would do.. but you'll need some 
tag for it and a wiki page.








___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Water featuers

2015-05-15 Thread Janko Mihelić
 pet, 15. svi 2015. 13:15 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com je napisao:

On 15/05/2015 4:55 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
 A lot of those end up as natural=water.  I suppose man_made=yes could
 be added.


The 'Pool of Reflection' Sydney is simply tagged
natural=water
name=Pool of Reflection

Way: 182625202

That is an ornamental memorial pool. Flat.


 Ups, i changed the title. Anyway:

Wiki suggests natural=water + water=reflecting_pool:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:water#Possible_values

Maybe water=cascade could be the right fit.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging