On May 25, 2015, at 6:53 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
Am 24.05.2015 um 14:36 schrieb John Willis jo...@mac.com:
I always thought a cascade is a series of waterfalls connected together.
I thought it was a word for a single waterfall as well...
The water
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:53:48PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 24.05.2015 um 14:36 schrieb John Willis jo...@mac.com:
I always thought a cascade is a series of waterfalls connected together.
I thought it was a word for a single waterfall as well...
in some languages a
Am 25.05.2015 um 13:37 schrieb Richard ricoz@gmail.com:
in some languages a cascade is any series of things, be it
electronic switches in circuits or waterfalls - even in English
as I have just noticed from reading wiktionary:
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cascade
So cascade
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 01:46:18PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
So cascade would be a true weasel tag.
yes, it is typical for words to have different meanings in different
contexts, but water=cascade will be much less a weasel than the word cascade
alone
still enough of a weasel
2015-05-25 17:11 GMT+02:00 Richard ricoz@gmail.com:
[water=cascade] still weasel enough. Could be a single waterfall, a series
of them or this:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moldau-Kaskade
fountain_type=cascade should make the object clear
if you'd want to be more specific:
I always thought a cascade is a series of waterfalls connected together.
Wether that is natural or artificial, I'm not sure there's a distinction.
http://www.tripadvisor.com/MobileViewPhoto-g298182-d1311890-i131738347-Ryuzu_Waterfall-Nikko_Tochigi_Prefecture_Kanto.html
I've visited a lot of
Am 24.05.2015 um 14:36 schrieb John Willis jo...@mac.com:
I always thought a cascade is a series of waterfalls connected together.
I thought it was a word for a single waterfall as well...
Also - saying a waterfall is a reflecting pool is very disingenuous - it's
not that it
On 24 May 2015 at 22:53, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 24.05.2015 um 14:36 schrieb John Willis jo...@mac.com:
I always thought a cascade is a series of waterfalls connected together.
I thought it was a word for a single waterfall as well...
Only where the
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 03:54:57PM +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On 22 May 2015 at 15:29, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote:
I am uncomfortable with cascade - in several languages it
means waterfall so there is considerable potential for
confusion.
I agree. A cascade is a
On 23 May 2015 at 11:09, Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 03:54:57PM +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On 22 May 2015 at 15:29, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote:
I am uncomfortable with cascade - in several languages it
means waterfall so there is
Am 22.05.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
Cascades, by their very nature, are not suitable for reflecting as the
water is agitated.
maybe this is a language issue, I would have thought they would reflect anyway
but you wouldn't see a clear picture (I agree
On 15 May 2015 at 12:25, pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com wrote:
'Pond' seems to fit the bill:
No, it does not.
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On 15 May 2015 at 16:40, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
Wiki suggests natural=water + water=reflecting_pool:
Cascades, by their very nature, are not suitable for reflecting as the
water is agitated. There may also be no horizontal surface to speak
of.
Maybe water=cascade could be the
On 22 May 2015 at 12:03, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
what are the other examples? We cannot propose tags if you don't say what you
want to tag ;-)
man-made, ornamental water features, which are not fountains
These might be cascades, rills, reflecting-pools, rain-chains,
Am 22.05.2015 um 13:35 schrieb Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
These might be cascades, rills, reflecting-pools, rain-chains, moats, etc.
We might, for example, have:
natural=water
water=cascde
etc. - but not:
water=fountain
as we already have
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 09:26:34AM -0500, John F. Eldredge wrote:
The water feature we are talking about here is an artificial waterfall,
usually pump-driven.
in that case it might be better to either use normal waterfall tagging
node with waterway=waterfall+ way waterway=weir,
possibly
On 22 May 2015 at 15:29, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote:
I am uncomfortable with cascade - in several languages it
means waterfall so there is considerable potential for
confusion.
I agree. A cascade is a waterfall in American English.
How, then would you describe:
On 22 May 2015 at 15:54, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
How, then would you describe:
Or these:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Site_of_Priory_Mill_-_geograph.org.uk_-_288573.jpg
The water feature we are talking about here is an artificial waterfall,
usually pump-driven.
On May 22, 2015 9:19:44 AM Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:00:30PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 22.05.2015 um 13:35 schrieb Andy Mabbett
I am uncomfortable with cascade - in several languages it
means waterfall so there is considerable potential for
confusion.
I agree. A cascade is a waterfall in American English.
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:00:30PM +0200,
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:00:30PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 22.05.2015 um 13:35 schrieb Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
These might be cascades, rills, reflecting-pools, rain-chains, moats, etc.
We might, for example, have:
natural=water
How about fountain_cascade or waterfall_artificial?
It's a tricky proposition.
On Friday, May 22, 2015, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 22 May 2015 at 15:54, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk
javascript:; wrote:
How, then would you describe:
Or these:
A lot of those end up as natural=water. I suppose man_made=yes could be
added.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
How should we tag man=made, ornamental water features, which are not
fountains? For example, a cascade?
The wiki pages at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Water
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfountain
are of little help in this regard.
--
Andy Mabbett
2015-05-15 8:48 GMT+02:00 Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
How should we tag man=made, ornamental water features, which are not
fountains? For example, a cascade?
fountains also require a natural=water for the effective water areas. See
here:
'Pond' seems to fit the bill: OED: A small body of still water of
artificial formation, made either by excavating a hollow in the ground or
by embanking and damming up a watercourse in a natural hollow.
On 15 May 2015 at 12:13, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15/05/2015 4:55 PM, Bryce
On 15/05/2015 4:55 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
A lot of those end up as natural=water. I suppose man_made=yes could
be added.
The 'Pool of Reflection' Sydney is simply tagged
natural=water
name=Pool of Reflection
Way: 182625202
That is an ornamental memorial pool. Flat.
I've added a just
pet, 15. svi 2015. 13:15 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com je napisao:
On 15/05/2015 4:55 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
A lot of those end up as natural=water. I suppose man_made=yes could
be added.
The 'Pool of Reflection' Sydney is simply tagged
natural=water
name=Pool of Reflection
Way: 182625202
28 matches
Mail list logo
