I've been knocking about the whole idea of route planning in places where there
is next to no online information currently available, e.g. bus operators, both
public and certainly private, for just about anywhere you might need a visa for.
Part of what I was thinking about is probably done
Pozdrav maperi,
primjetio sam da kod upisivanja naziva ulica imamo trend izbacivati ulica
iz naziva. Jasno mi je da ih je tako lakše izgovarati, ali imena ulica i
dalje nisu samo Gundulićeva nego Ulica Ivana Gundulića. U isto vrijeme
se ne izbacuje cesta, odvojak, trg, avenija, zavoj, aleja i
Sanela je napisala, greškom samo meni:
2011/7/7 sanela spvuji...@gmail.com
I mene je to zbunjivalo dok nisam vidjela sluzbene karte sa lokalnim
nazivima a la Kaciceva, Jukiceva i sl.
A ja odgovorio:
2011/7/7 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com
Gledaj na te karte kao na rendere, a na našu kartu
On 07/07/2011 10:01 PM, Janko Mihelić wrote:
2011/7/7 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com
Gledaj na te karte kao na rendere, a na našu kartu kao na bazu točnih
informacija. Oni su napisali Klaićeva i Kačićeva zato što im je tako
ljepše izgledalo. Možda i izgleda ljepše, ali to ne znači da je točno.
Možda, ali za to postoji tag loc_namehttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Name.
2011/7/7 Ivo Ugrina i...@iugrina.com
On 07/07/2011 10:01 PM, Janko Mihelić wrote:
2011/7/7 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com
Gledaj na te karte kao na rendere, a na našu kartu kao na bazu točnih
informacija. Oni
On 2011-07-06 23:31, John Smith wrote:
On 7 July 2011 07:25, Andreas Perstingerandreas.perstin...@gmx.net wrote:
No, I just wanted to show you that you can't really tell if someone retraces
a removed way by looking at an aerial imagery, by looking at the current OSM
map or by just moving
On 7 July 2011 16:16, Andreas Perstinger andreas.perstin...@gmx.net wrote:
That's why I prefer PD because I believe there is no protection and so why
bother about licenses at all?
Wouldn't it be great if we could all wish away inconvenient laws like
that, however morality often drives laws and
Probably OT:
On 2011-07-07 02:25, John Smith wrote:
How many painters die poor?
What about famous composers?
Economics became an issue much later.
So artists have a human right to be rich?
There are many reasons why painters or composers die poor (people don't
like their work and don't
On 2011-07-07 08:24, John Smith wrote:
On 7 July 2011 16:16, Andreas Perstingerandreas.perstin...@gmx.net wrote:
That's why I prefer PD because I believe there is no protection and so why
bother about licenses at all?
Wouldn't it be great if we could all wish away inconvenient laws like
On 7 July 2011 16:40, Andreas Perstinger andreas.perstin...@gmx.net wrote:
So artists have a human right to be rich?
Glad you took my point so far out of context, someone claimed that
copyright existed for economic reasons.
___
legal-talk mailing list
Simon,
Andreas,
all,
when discussing these things with the person who goes by the
pseudonym of John Smith, keep in mind that he is spending a lot of
time building/supporting an OpenStreetMap fork.
The forkers, as I like to call them, are driven by all kinds of
motivations, the most
On 7 July 2011 16:58, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
While they started out wishing OSM to suffer the least possible damage,
their ego now forces them to demand the most rigid - even absurd - data
deletion policies for the license change lest they look like idiots for
starting a fork
Frederik, I'm fully aware of JS motives and tactics and normally avoid
getting sucked in to his endless threads.
But it was 2 am and I was just finishing tax returns and associated
book keeping. John Smith is a tiny bit more entertaining than that and I
needed a short break :-)
Simon
Am
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Simon,
Andreas,
all,
when discussing these things with the person who goes by the pseudonym of
John Smith, keep in mind that he is spending a lot of time
building/supporting an OpenStreetMap fork.
The forkers, as
+1
Frederik has not shown much respect for any argument
nor to anyone that disagrees with the future commercialisation
of OSM. (with that I means making OSM optimally fit for commercial use;
disregarding the open principles that OSM started with:
leaving out the Share Alike principle)
On 2011-07-07 08:58, Frederik Ramm wrote:
when discussing these things with the person who goes by the
pseudonym of John Smith, keep in mind that he is spending a lot of
time building/supporting an OpenStreetMap fork.
I know who John Smith and his fellows are and I even read their
On 2011-07-07 08:39, Anthony wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Andreas Perstinger
No (see above). But I think it's more a question of morality and adhering to
community guidelines. Legally I don't see any problems using informations
from any map (or aerial imagery).
But using
On 2011-07-07 09:35, 80n wrote:
Data loss is your problem not ours. I see people doing thought experiments
about how they can get around the wishes of contributors who have, in good
faith, provided their content under the CC license. Those people who have
not agreed to the CT have not
On 2011-07-07 08:48, Anthony wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:45 AM, Andreas Perstinger
andreas.perstin...@gmx.net wrote:
On 2011-07-07 08:24, John Smith wrote:
Wouldn't it be great if we could all wish away inconvenient laws like
that, however morality often drives laws and they tend seem
On 07/07/2011 07:41, Anthony wrote:
Thanks Toby. I'm forwarding this to Dave Fox, who is the one who
actually asked the question.
It follows pretty naturally out of the database schema. Anything that
modifies the ways, way_tags or way_nodes tables creates a new version
of the way. Things
On 2011-07-07 19:55, John Smith wrote:
On 7 July 2011 21:49, Andreas Perstingerandreas.perstin...@gmx.net wrote:
But that doesn't mean that their content won't show up in a future ODBL
map. I've noticed that John Smith doesn't want to answer my question, but
perhaps you would: How far away
+1
Gert
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: John Smith [mailto:deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: donderdag 7 juli 2011 19:55
Aan: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes
On 7 July 2011 21:49, Andreas Perstinger
On 07/07/11 20:14, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
+1
/2
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
On 16 June 2011 21:08, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
On 06/16/11 12:31, Dermot McNally wrote:
Not quite, based on what Richard is saying. It would allow future
relicensing but only if the new licence remained compatible with the
terms seen to be required by the OS (currently
It is confusing, but I don't think that I'd call it correct, either.
New Guinea can be considered part of the Australian continent, but New
Zealand is not. It's Islands, and not on the continental shelf. It
and NG are sometimes listed as part of Australasia (not Australia),
and a bigger area
On 7 July 2011 17:56, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
Looking at the details it seems like the Australia being referred to
is the continent, not the country. The New Zealand node has a
is_in:continent=Australia tag and there is a place=continent node
a-ha, thanks
that nominatim is
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
Yes, thats the consensus and has been for a long time. Some mappers always
disagree, just ignore them. :-)
+1
And in software, it is always easier to shorten a word than expanding an
abbreviation. 'st' is for 'Saint' or for
On 7 July 2011 19:23, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
Yes, thats the consensus and has been for a long time. Some mappers always
disagree, just ignore them. :-)
+1
And in software, it is always easier to shorten a word
On 06/07/2011 03:54, Robin Paulson wrote:
hi,
I'm currently adding a lot of bus routes to roads in central Auckland.
problem is, it's getting hard to manage.
some road segments have 40+ routes on them, which gets complicated.
here is an example of one which I've added 12 routes to; there will
Occasionally some one may wish to add a translation or find the street
programmatically. For example using Maperitive and a local copy to search
for the street. Having the full name helps enormously. End users don't
like having to try high street, high St. etc until they find the right
On 06/07/2011 10:03, Jo wrote:
There is this proposal
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Route_Segments,
which I like, but it seems it's not worked on anymore and it's not
rendered, since it involves relations containing relations. I don't
really mind having many relations
With P2 the easier way of working is to select a whole series of ways
(ctrl-click to add a second way while maintaining selection of the
first), then add all of the ways to a relation (or multiple relations)
at the same time.
You can select all members of an existing relation using the little
On 7 July 2011 11:29, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 July 2011 19:23, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
Yes, thats the consensus and has been for a long time. Some mappers always
disagree, just ignore them.
On 07/07/11 10:29, John Smith wrote:
In some cases, the official name is with the abbreviation, eg St.
George Bank in Australia and there is a town named St. George.
Yes. I found one just today actually. Ordnance Survey (national
mapping agency) record the name as Upper St Giles Street. The
Awesome. Can you go run that project and leave us in peace then please?
Steve
On 7/7/2011 12:35 AM, 80n wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
mailto:frede...@remote.org wrote:
Simon,
Andreas,
all,
when discussing these things with the
After careful consideration, effective immediately Mikel Maron, Andy
Robinson and Mike Collinson have access to the moderation system
across the main OSM mailing lists. They will use their best judgment
according to the a
href=http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Etiquette#Mailing_Lists;
moderation
On 7 July 2011 23:33, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
In some cases, the official name is with the abbreviation, eg St.
George Bank in Australia and there is a town named St. George.
Still you say Saint George, not S.T. George.
Well you can ring up the bank/local government and
On 7 July 2011 21:49, Andreas Perstinger andreas.perstin...@gmx.net wrote:
But that doesn't mean that their content won't show up in a future ODBL
map. I've noticed that John Smith doesn't want to answer my question, but
perhaps you would: How far away do I have to move a node or a way so that
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:55 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 July 2011 21:49, Andreas Perstinger andreas.perstin...@gmx.net wrote:
But that doesn't mean that their content won't show up in a future ODBL
map. I've noticed that John Smith doesn't want to answer my question,
On 7 July 2011 23:02, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
You don't actually say what the problem is.
err, what? the problem is managing the ways inside the editor
(potlatch 2). it gets very messy and is hard to keep track of. i find
at later dates i have made several mistakes that need
On 7 July 2011 23:59, Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com wrote:
With P2 the easier way of working is to select a whole series of ways
(ctrl-click to add a second way while maintaining selection of the
first), then add all of the ways to a relation (or multiple relations)
at the
On 07/07/2011 21:52, Robin Paulson wrote:
On 7 July 2011 23:02, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
You don't actually say what the problem is.
err, what? the problem is managing the ways inside the editor
(potlatch 2).
You made no mention of that in your original post. Maybe you should
I, for one, welcome our new moderator overlords. Seriously, I'm very
glad this decision has been taken, and I hope we can use it to lift
the level of discussion.
Steve
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
After careful consideration, effective immediately Mikel
i'm currently adding house numbers to some properties in my locality
(and using this to prepare for an import).
the problem is this: some blocks of houses have both a street address
and a unit number. so we might have the situation of 12/8 mount eden
road, auckland
which means:
property number
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Robin Paulson robin.paul...@gmail.com wrote:
i'm currently adding house numbers to some properties in my locality
(and using this to prepare for an import).
the problem is this: some blocks of houses have both a street address
and a unit number. so we might
h2This week/h2
We're on the way to Vienna for a
href=http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/State_Of_The_Map_Europe_2011;State
of the Map-EU/a, so the Project of the Week is to map those things
that will help you get to Vienna. a
I find there are a lot more abbreviations if you look at addr:street=
rather than the name= . I suspect that with mobile entry of POI's we
are going to see more and more abbreviations being entered, just because
mobile keyboards are slow. I would applaud a bot that asked me if I
meant the
On 7 July 2011 19:50, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 July 2011 23:33, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
In some cases, the official name is with the abbreviation, eg St.
George Bank in Australia and there is a town named St. George.
Still you say Saint George, not
On 8 July 2011 13:59, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 July 2011 19:50, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 July 2011 23:33, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
In some cases, the official name is with the abbreviation, eg St.
George Bank in Australia and
I've come across a fair number of what I call obvious turn restrictions.
Here's an example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1566983
The only thing being prevented by this is turning right onto Shelbyville
Road from the motorway_link. But there's a cutoff to the southeast that
you
Hi,
Steve Bennett wrote:
I, for one, welcome our new moderator overlords. Seriously, I'm very
glad this decision has been taken, and I hope we can use it to lift
the level of discussion.
I can practically feel things getting better already!
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail
Op 05-07-11 15:33, Willem Sonke schreef:
On 05-07-11 02:13, Andre Engels wrote:
2011/7/5 drek d...@drek.nl mailto:d...@drek.nl
Weet iemand misschien een antwoord op mijn vraag? Ik wil graag
commentaar bij een gedane wijziging wijzigen. Is dit mogelijk?
Nee, voorzover ik weet kan dat
Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote:
Wow, you infer a lot from my four word sentence. Do you have any
evidence to back any of it up?
You mean other than the message you affirmed pretty strongly?
Maybe it's a difference between Australian English and British English,
but I'd think those four
Thanks for the responses. So it seems there will be some fragmentation. Some
are moving to fosm, some are moving elsewhere, some are staying with OSM,
some have stopped actively contributing and are on hold... I wrote this mail
for two reasons, to get a sense of where local contributors stand, but
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.comwrote:
The more who contribute directly to fosm rather than OSM, the less the work
there will be for fosmers dealing with duplicated data resulting from
merges. If it becomes a big problem, I think we should be able to do
FOSMs not going anywhere for some simple reasons.
The people running it are ineffective, the data will be incompatible
when OSM switches, fosm doesn't have any of the agreements to derive
data from aerial imagery. I could go on, but those are the big ticket items.
Everyone should be aware of
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote:
FOSMs not going anywhere for some simple reasons.
The people running it are ineffective, the data will be incompatible when
OSM switches, fosm doesn't have any of the agreements to derive data from
aerial imagery. I could
On 7/7/2011 7:15 AM, 80n wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com
mailto:st...@asklater.com wrote:
FOSMs not going anywhere for some simple reasons.
The people running it are ineffective, the data will be
incompatible when OSM switches, fosm doesn't
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote:
You've been very successful at perverting certain sections of the
community, Australia being a good example ...
Steve, please don't underestimate the ability of Australia to filter
bullshit.
I just want to:
1) be able to
On 7/7/2011 7:40 AM, waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com
mailto:st...@asklater.com wrote:
You've been very successful at perverting certain sections of the
community, Australia being a good example ...
Steve, please don't
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote:
...I believe we should spend energy enlightening aerial providers (or wait
for them to catch up)
Yup, I'm waiting... (I just wanted to point out why I have stopped
contributing - it's not in protest, and not because I've
On 7 July 2011 15:09, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote:
FOSMs not going anywhere for some simple reasons.
The people running it are ineffective, the data will be incompatible when
OSM switches, fosm doesn't have any of the agreements to derive data from
aerial imagery. I could go on, but
Why did you stop then? Is there no aerial imagery where you are other
than nearmap?
On 7/7/2011 8:03 AM, waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com
mailto:st...@asklater.com wrote:
...I believe we should spend energy enlightening aerial
On 8 July 2011 00:55, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote:
We've gone to insanely long lengths to make that the case, including getting
clarifications from Ordnance Survey, Nearmap and many others. As far as I'm
aware there are no remaining issues as to why you can't click 'accept'.
He said
On 08/07/11 00:01, 80n wrote:
The probability of collisions is quite small in practice. We are able
to automatically sync all OSM updates into fosm.org http://fosm.org in
near real time. Consequenly fosm.org http://fosm.org already has more
content than OSM and the gap will continue to widen.
On 8 July 2011 06:46, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
What particularly turns me off fosm.org is that I am unable to see a map
when I go to the site. Using Firefox on Linux, I click on Maps and get
FOSM based tiles are being uploaded to archive.org:
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 08:11 -0700, Steve Coast wrote:
Why did you stop then? Is there no aerial imagery where you are other
than nearmap?
Theres this thing in Australia called loyalty. You seem to understand
very little about Australian culture. Its almost the height of rudeness
after someone
Hi John,
At low zoom I see lots of broken tiles. I was looking at Hobart. Any Ideas?
Neal
- Original Message -
From: John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
To: John Henderson snow...@gmx.com
Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, 8 July, 2011 6:53:00 AM
Subject: Re: [talk-au]
I wonder if people would mind keeping their unconstructive comments for some
other medium than this list.
On Jul 8, 2011 9:24 AM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
Theres this thing in Australia called loyalty. You seem to understand
very little about Australian culture. Its almost
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
Since the ban on all contributors who didn't sign the CTs, and ban on all
new contributors from using NearMap and other CC-BY/CC-BY-SA sources, I'm no
longer actively contributing to the OSM database. Instead I am now
On 7 July 2011 22:55, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote:
On 7/7/2011 7:40 AM, waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote:
You've been very successful at perverting certain sections of the
community, Australia being a good example ...
On 6 July 2011 21:29, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
and also people who ticked the CTs who have used CC-BY/CC-BY-SA sources in
the past who may want to keep this data and continue using these sources in
the future.
Indeed. Number 9 on the list is
This reads like you disagree with taxation or death. I do too, but there's not
much I can do about it. The vast majority of people are happy with where we are
at and now it's down to people holding out because of a comma in the wrong
place or a moral objection to various aspects of intellectual
On 8 July 2011 13:26, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
The vast majority of people are happy with where we are at
What about the 50 odd percent of people that haven't responded?
I don't see how it's reasonable to throw everything away for one guy who
doesn't like his countries laws.
So
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:26 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I don't see how it's reasonable to throw everything away for one guy who
doesn't like his
countries laws.
There are more countries without sui generis database rights laws than with it.
On 8 July 2011 13:26, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
The vast majority of people are happy with where we are at
From what I've read on ML posts, and from what was reported about the last
SotM meeting (I wasn't there), the vast majority of people don't care and
would be happy with the status
I would phrase it that the vast majority aren't lawyers and don't want to
become one, therefore don't know the implications of the problems with cc. That
is all this is predicated upon, lawyers say that cc doesn't work for data. If
they didn't say that then we would never have gone down this
What you say mike is mostly reasonable apart from the control bit. It's a
democratically elected nonprofit, so it's hard to cast that as a dictatorship.
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Jul 7, 2011, at 20:47, Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Chris
On 8 July 2011 13:54, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I would phrase it that the vast majority aren't lawyers and don't want to
become one, therefore don't know the implications of the problems with cc.
It's a false assumption, the only way it would be geo factual data is
if you copied 1:1
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:54 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I would phrase it that the vast majority aren't lawyers and don't want to
become one, therefore don't know the implications of the problems with cc.
That is all this is predicated upon, lawyers say that cc doesn't work for
data.
Actually, the license process has been known about for a long, long time so
it's not this new turnaround you cast it as. In addition, everyone else (bing,
ordnance survey...) has worked with us very reasonably. In fact it's hard to
say near map have been unreasonable, just that they were not
The control seems to be good, but I have no personal say in it.
The new license maybe good, but I dont want to accept it if I dont
understand it 100%.
With the new distributed system we are building I can :
1. Host my own maps without begging or asking for permissions.
2. Commit my own code to
On 8 July 2011 14:06, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Actually, the license process has been known about for a long, long time so
it's not this new turnaround you cast it as. In addition, everyone else
(bing, ordnance survey...) has worked with us very reasonably. In fact it's
hard to say
On 8 July 2011 14:06, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
As for this 'uk mob' thing, that too is unreasonable. As a democratically
elected board, we have members from many countries and you are invited to get
involved or run for election.
Is it true that you had to do a lot of rule fiddling so
Nathan
I've been mapping farm fences etc in the Yass, NSW
area, where the Bing resolution is high enough to do so
Hi Nathan,
Do you live near Yass? If so can you throw any light on the two or three
streets that don't have street signs on them?
I've tried many times to find names for the road
On 8 July 2011 11:26, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
This reads like you disagree with taxation or death. I do too, but there's
not much I can do about it. The vast majority of people are happy with where
we are at and now it's down to people holding out because of a comma in the
wrong
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:37 AM, James Andrewartha
tr...@student.uwa.edu.au wrote:
On 8 July 2011 11:26, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
This reads like you disagree with taxation or death. I do too, but there's
not much I can do about it. The vast majority of people are happy with where
we
Obrigado por responder !!!
Eu gostaria de baixar somente o Rio de Janeiro, mas o Brasil não faz mal.
Eu gostaria de entender melhor como baixar os mapas, quais arquivos
baixar de onde e etc.
Agora aplicação para IOS eu não sei, não tenho iphone e se tivesse um,
poderia tentar te ajudar a
Hi Liste,
Ich benötige OSM Daten die in einem 50km Radius um meinen Wohnort liegen.
Über die API schaffe ich es nicht, die meint das Gebiet (bbox) ist zu groß.
Zur Zeit nutze ich die Daten von Rheinland-Pfalz die die Geofabrik zur
Verfügung
stellt. Mit meinem 50km Radius erwische ich aber
Hallo,
On 07/07/11 08:35, Michael Buchberger wrote:
Mehrere OSM Dateien zu einer zusammenfassen sollte kein Problem sein
osmosis --rx 1.osm --rx 2.osm --rx 3.osm --merge --merge --wx merged.osm
Besser das Europa-File runterladen, sonst hast Du komische Effekte an
den Schnittstellen.
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 12:05:13AM +0200, Stephan Wolff wrote:
Moin!
Am 06.07.2011 14:19, schrieb Florian Lohoff:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 12:27:29PM +0200, Sven Sommerkamp wrote:
Die Frage ist doch immer wieviel ist ausreichend und macht Sinn?
Nein - es gibt kein ausreichend. Jeder darf
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 12:20:08AM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Ja, das stimmt. Das sind zum Beispiel auch die ueblichen Argumente
gegen Luftraum- oder Historien-Mapping. Aber darueber kann man ja
sprechen und einen Konsens finden. Selbst (oder gerade?) einem
Anfaengermapper wuerde vermutlich
Ja.
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Hallo!
Also zu http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Current_Events an sich:
Die Liste ist chonologisch und mit den Symbolen schön übersichtlich. Ich finde
es gut, dass es /einen/ Ort gibt, wo man /alles/ finden kann.
Wenn es einen iCalalendar Export gäbe, dann würde ich mir dort eine regionale
Nach einer Streckenwanderung im Raum Bad Kreuznach - Bad Dürkheim bin
ich gerade dabei, die dabei entdeckten Wanderwege zu erfassen.
Auf eine Anfrage beim Trägerverein Naturpark Soonwald-Nahe e.V.
Geschäftsstelle Bad Kreuznach haben wir die Erlaubnis die von Ihnen
betreuten Wanderwege in OSM
Hallo Florian,
(an die Anderen: sorry, aber meine direkten Mails an Florian blieben bisher
unbeantwortet)
bitte gehe mal auf meinen direkten Mailanfragen (von ostr...@diesei.de) an
Deine auch hier verwendete Mailadresse ein bzgl. Bereitstellung der bei Dir
früher gespeicherten Straßenlisten. Ich
Florian Lohoff f at zz.de writes:
Ist mir auch so gegangen - Mal eine 10 Einwohnerstadt mit einem
landuser=residential gemapped. Im nachhinein keine gute Idee :)
Vermutlich deshalb unschön, weil du jetzt alles darin in ein Multipolygon packen
darfst?
Ist immer etwas schwierig, abzuwägen,
Das Gerät könnte interessant sein.
http://www.pocketnavigation.de/news/view_2792__medion-zeigt-erstes-eigenes-outdoor-navi-auf-der-ifa/1.1.88.html
Mal sehen, ob man auch selbst erstellte Karte installieren kann.
Jacques
___
Talk-de mailing list
Am 07.07.2011 11:35, schrieb hike39:
Nach einer Streckenwanderung im Raum Bad Kreuznach - Bad Dürkheim bin
ich gerade dabei, die dabei entdeckten Wanderwege zu erfassen.
Auf eine Anfrage beim Trägerverein Naturpark Soonwald-Nahe e.V.
Geschäftsstelle Bad Kreuznach haben wir die Erlaubnis die
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 12:24:05PM +0200, Dietmar wrote:
Hallo Florian,
(an die Anderen: sorry, aber meine direkten Mails an Florian blieben bisher
unbeantwortet)
bitte gehe mal auf meinen direkten Mailanfragen (von ostr...@diesei.de) an
Deine auch hier verwendete Mailadresse ein bzgl.
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
