2011/6/16 Andreas Perstingerandreas.perstin...@gmx.net:
If there is just *one* single object near your way which isn't based on a
ccbysa node/way, then you could always argue IMHO that you've measured the
location of your way from this object (JOSM has a measurement tool with you
can use for
On 09/06/2011 17:36, Ed Avis wrote:
What stops more people using OSM?
While I agree with your other points, even before you get to the data, I
think the first reason is people don't know about it.
And for most people, why would you not just use Google maps even if you did?
David
On 15/04/2011 19:50, David Earl wrote:
there's various lane indications such as
cycleway=lane
...
PS if you want examples, Cambridge and the surrounding area is
particularly dense with all the variations of these all over the place.
David
On 04/02/2011 10:46, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Sorry for writing in the international list, this is actually
concerning the UK. I noticed that Cardiff and Edinburgh are tagged as
capital=yes, which according to the wiki stands for national capital.
I suggest to change this into capital=4 or are
On 21/01/2011 10:02, Kevin Peat wrote:
So I should delete the various admin boundaries in the db then as they
cannot be viewed on the ground?
Well said. I absolutely agree admin boundaries have the same kind of
status as postcodes.
I think there is value in visualising postcodes, and while
On 21/01/2011 10:10, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 21/01/11 10:02, Kevin Peat wrote:
So I should delete the various admin boundaries in the db then as they
cannot be viewed on the ground?
They may not be viewable on the ground, but they are real in the sense
that somebody has defined them by
On Sunday, 26 December 2010, Richard r...@f2s.com wrote:
My personal opinion is that Signed on the ground should always take
precedence.
+1
But you can always use alt_ name where there is another variant (or
even completely different name).
David
On Monday, November 1, 2010, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On 29/10/2010 22:22, thomas van der veen wrote:
You might like to take note that nothing is implicit in OSM. There are no
defaults as renderers or
On 22/08/2010 14:13, John F. Eldredge wrote:
My largest complaint is that, if you click yes, you not only are
agreeing to the current new license, but you are also agreeing in
advance to any future license changes, without being able to know
what those new license terms will be. It is the
On 10/08/2010 21:31, Richard Moss wrote:
On Tue 10/08/10 16:36 , David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com
sent:
I'm doing a printed cycle map which covers, among other places,
Huntingdon. This needs to include the old Houghton Road which has
been re-opened for bikes and buses since I surveyed
On 05/08/2010 14:44, Tom Hughes wrote:
If the OpenID provider supplies sufficient data (basically an email
address and nickname) then they need do little more than click OK to
accept the details and then accept the terms.
Are you going to take the email address on trust? It is really very easy
On 31/07/2010 10:05, Ulf Lamping wrote:
There are people who actively watch out their area what changes there.
That's fine and valueable. But IMHO it's *their job* to make sense of
the changes, not the mappers job.
What a selfish attitude for a supposedly co-operative project.
It may be
On 31/07/2010 10:50, John Smith wrote:
On 31 July 2010 19:24, David Earlda...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
I don't understand your attitude at all: it hardly takes a moment to add a
helpful comment, but many minutes or hours to make the change itself. It is
hardly a burden.
You gave a very
On 31/07/2010 11:52, Pieren wrote:
Sourcing might be the only meaningfull comment I could see. This is the
only important information that cannot be retrieved by software and is
required to justify some actions e.g. features displacements. We should
better replace 'comment' by 'source' in the
On 27/07/2010 00:23, Dave F. wrote:
On 25/07/2010 19:56, David Earl wrote:
My two talks for State of the Map
* Tag Central - a schema for OpenStreetMap
* What I learned making a real map on real paper for real people and
real money
are now available online at http://www.frankieandshadow.com
Design Observer, which I follow on and off for other reasons, has just
published article about Kibera (which Mikel talked about most
inspiringly at SotM).
http://changeobserver.designobserver.com/entry.html?entry=14698
David
___
talk mailing list
On 27/07/2010 13:07, Richard Mann wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:15 AM, David Earlda...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
... 'junction=approach' ...
I _used_ it to suppress one way arrows.
I ended up using oneway:reverse=block, to positively identify
meaningful oneways.
I was trying to
Hi,
Something like this was a proposed Google Summer of Code project that
didn't make it to the final cut, so I'm very pleased to see it.
I got a server error trying to save on my first attempt. Retrying it worked.
How do I get a URL of my route to share with someone? Presumably it is
just
On 27/07/2010 17:18, arno wrote:
Le mardi 27 juillet 2010, à 15:45:46 +0100, David a écrit :
How do I get a URL of my route to share with someone? Presumably it
is just the URL in the address bar after a save, but a give me a
URL button or some such would be handy.
I'm not sure a button is
My two talks for State of the Map
* Tag Central - a schema for OpenStreetMap
* What I learned making a real map on real paper for real people and
real money
are now available online at http://www.frankieandshadow.com/sotm10/
David
___
talk mailing
Is anyone else, by any chance, travelling to Girona on the Trenhotel
overnight train from Paris? If so, do contact me (off list) and we could
meet up on the train. I'm talking about the one leaving Paris around
20:30 on Thursday evening.
David
___
On 30/06/2010 02:48, Stephen Hope wrote:
I'm a bit confused as to what exactly counts as a nature_preserve.
nature_reserve not _preserve
Take a look at this area
http://www.nearmap.com/?ll=-27.277213,152.952728z=18t=knmd=20100608
The land around the creek there is a council designated
This reached me via a roundabout route about an event on Thursday late
afternoon. Is anyone from OSM involved? Is anyone going? Is someone in
the London area able to go? Looks light up our street, so to speak.
http://www.mappingforchange.org.uk
and in particular:
On 07/06/2010 10:22, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Then if you, as a mapper, find that the restaurant has
moved across town you'll have to find out what to do with these UUIDs
(or, more likely, you'll just leave them alone).
Isn't that going to be true whatever mechanism is used?
If the OSM object
On 06/04/2010 17:51, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
A lot of stuff nowadays is done from aerial imagery, but they can still drop
back to traditional surveying methods if required.
It was a strange coincidence that I met an OS surveyor, theodolite in
hand, doing just that when I was
I thought it was very interesting to look at the OS and OSM overlaid on
each other on the WMS link someone posted.
1. I was very impressed with how really accurate OSM is compared to OS
where I know it has been done systematically
2. I was disappointed to see how out of date the OS data is -
might be able to take
that position also. Many thanks, David Earl
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 25/03/2010 13:36, Thomas Wood wrote:
Wow, good work. I suppose this will start a flood of localisation
requests for other metro systems, this will probably be a good thing -
it'll force our mapnik localisation to be made better! (maybe I could
target it as a GSoC project for myself...)
As
I thought this was an interesting little article:
http://bit.ly/alE861
(
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20527524.500-motion-sensors-could-track-troops-when-gps-cuts-out.html
)
I wonder whether they might be interested in offering us some units for
testing?
David
On 23/03/2010 12:21, John Smith wrote:
On 23 March 2010 21:56, David Earlda...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
I wonder whether they might be interested in offering us some units for
testing?
Using inertial navigation the accuracy deteriorates considerably over time.
On 21 Mar 2010, at 00:15, Gregory nomoregra...@googlemail.com wrote:
(I have managed to get audio-clip mapping working ever)
(I assume there is a 'not' missing from that)
Have you read:
http://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/AudioMapping
and
On 09/03/2010 11:29, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
I'm currently trying to form a sort of consensus as to the best way of
defining the classes of highway in the US, and a bit of information
about the UK would help. I know about the definitions used
(trunk=primary route network, primary=A roads,
Does anyone know what happens to ncn11 south of Stansted Mountfitchet?
I mapped it through to there a few months ago and then went back to
take it further but couldn't find it on the ground. I'd assumed it
followed the Lea valley maybe via Bishops Stortford and Harlow, but
the signs just
Original Message
Subject:National Trust Press Release - Reach Bridge Brings Lodes Way a
Step Closer
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:17:18 -
From: Cooper, Howard howard.coo...@nationaltrust.org.uk
5 March 2010
*Reach** Bridge** Brings Lodes Way a Step Closer*
**
On 27/02/2010 09:31, Valent Turkovic wrote:
I was hoping that Yahoo has their own maps and that we could use them.
Whatever the legality, I can't see the point in making a map which is
simply a copy of someone else's. Why go to the bother - you might as
well just use the original.
David
I'd like to say a few words on the home page and editor.
1. Home Page: while I think Steve's proposal addresses some of the
criticisms of the way the home page functions, I don't think it takes a
holistic view of the project. What someone coming to it will initially
see is essentially a me too
On 25/01/2010 10:29, Igor Brejc wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm thinking about buying a digital tablet and use it for drawing maps
in JOSM/Potlatch/... Has anyone had any experience with digital tablets
and GIS work (or even better - OSM work). I'm considering buying
something cheap, like Wacom
On 14/01/2010 18:27, Dave F. wrote:
Andy, The taxpayers have already paid for it, many times over. I resent
having to pay £7.50 for a map I've already financed to construct.
As I've paid for it, I think it should be given to me free of charge.
For a paper map, I think not. You've helped pay
On 18/12/2009 11:51, Mikel Maron wrote:
beyond that, the layout retains importance as
geographic context to photos, videos, memories. If you look at the
flickr map, the background map depends on whether the photo was taken in
2008 or 2009.
On 18/12/2009 12:19, David Earl wrote:
Actually if photos are geolocated like that, they also need a reference
datum stored too - how else will the space tourists of the future locate
their photos on the moon and on Mars?
Taking this to extremes:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17jymDn0W6Ufmt
There was an item on this lunchtime's You and Yours on BBC Radio 4 (a
consumer magazine programme) about mapping, Ordnance Survey and satnav,
which also mentioned OSM.
It's 35:30 minutes in at
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/b00p4l7x
David
On 28/11/2009 14:01, John F. Eldredge wrote:
So, ground level is level 0? I had wondered about that, as the
scanty documentation that I have seen didn't make that point clear.
well, it is the *default* level and the levels are relative. As with all
things OSM, as there is no rigid spec,
On 26/11/2009 18:55, Steve Bennett wrote:
2) I'm using the CloudMade site to test routing and fix bike paths in
my local area accordingly. But they only update their data once a week
or so. Is there a better way? What would I have to download and
install to be able to have a shorter turnaround
On 11/11/2009 14:31, Ed Avis wrote:
Frustrated by living in St Johns Close, in Turnbridge Wells, Mr Gatward
decided to buy a can of black paint and a craft brush before correcting the
name
to St John's Close.
I've come across any number of streets where the apostrophe is missing
on one
On 11/11/2009 16:17, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
and other punctuation (eg St. to St as an abbreviation for
Saint).
St. is wrong anyway - strictly speaking there should only be a period
after an abbreviation where letters are omitted, hence
St. for st...reet
St for
On 11/11/2009 10:39, Richard Mann wrote:
I found this a useful summary of the UK copyright position:
http://www.copyrightservice.co.uk/copyright/p09_fair_use
That's about the general concept.
This was the reason for my comment that our use on a street map would be
akin to news reporting
to show their store locations on the map
were we to ask them, as essentially free advertising, and I do hope TfL
might be able to take that position also.
Many thanks,
David Earl
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
On 11/11/2009 12:40, Peter Miller wrote:
I do also agree with Richard in that there are numerous possible map
styles emphasising many different sorts of features in a lot of
different languages
Sure, but there are some that are so iconic they are the expectation.
And as others said and
On 11/11/2009 12:44, Peter Childs wrote:
OSM also has the advantage that you can render your map your self, If
you want Yellow Primary Roads, London Transport Symbol for train
stations etc etc then go ahead, If you infridge copy right on your own
rendering its not in the OSM data so OSM can't
it on, and take it off if they complain.
Richard
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:22 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com
mailto:da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
On 10/11/2009 13:21, Peter Miller wrote:
On 10 Nov 2009, at 12:41, Ed Avis wrote:
Are we legally permitted
On 10/11/2009 15:02, Richard Mann wrote:
But simply reproducing their name or logo to represent them is just free
advertising, and they'd be laughed out of court.
Rubbish. It's their property and they can decide who uses it and where.
They may well not have any objection, but if they did,
On 10/11/2009 19:35, Peter Miller wrote:
On 10 Nov 2009, at 19:05, Tom Chance wrote:
We get permission from TfL, or we seek costly legal advice.
I agree that the cautious approach would be to ask. I was wondering if
we could use the argument that it is in the background (as is a photo of
On 09/11/2009 15:15, David Earl wrote:
Their page doesn't call it a bridleway either
Actually, following the link in the corner to
http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/transport/thebusway/community/rights/
it then says:
New bridleway and cycleway: To make sure people can still enjoy this
route
On 02/11/2009 13:11, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Domingo, 1 de Noviembre de 2009, Anthony escribió:
Yes, a collection of aerial images is a database. But a single aerial
image is probably not.
Heck, a single aerial image *is* a database of pixels :-D
By analogy then, so is this email a
On 01/11/2009 14:16, Jason Cunningham wrote:
I asked early on in the year for way to add a marker to a map when I
wanted to give a link to a map that that pointed out a location. ...
I suppose I am hoping that in the future there is some way to replicate
the easy method multimap provides.
On 01/11/2009 15:54, Tom Chance wrote:
Just to say that I do think the Export tab route is excessively
complicated, and that it's a shame the short links don't carry across
markers.
+1.
If only I had the time, I'd do something like this: present a map to
which you can freely add multiple
On 30/10/2009 14:38, Kirill Bestoujev wrote:
Oh my God
It is terrible!!!
We all gona die!
What is the problem? Did Google just once start a trial agains anyone
using GM images in violation of ToS? Just once?
No. Why? They really don't care. Look at wikimapia. Don't the
On 15/10/2009 11:02, Ed Avis wrote:
Ed Loach e...@... writes:
As only Sealand recognise Sealand and no
UN member does (from the wiki article you quote), I can't see the
claim that the sea boundary of England is wrong can be justified.
Who would have expected an edit war in the English
On 14/10/2009 13:40, David Earl wrote:
As I mentioned, I'd like to promote a Wisbech mapping party.
There's a sign up page now:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fenland/WisbechMappingParty2009-11
David
___
Talk-gb-midanglia mailing list
Talk-gb
I'm planning a mapping party for the weekend of 14/15 November to map
Wisbech, Cambridgeshire and environs. Anyone fancy a weekend in the Fens?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fenland/WisbechMappingParty2009-11
David
___
Talk-GB mailing list
On 09/10/2009 15:45, Tobias Knerr wrote:
We already have too many computer people who get carried away by thought
experiements (yes but if the spot where the road and railway intersect
also happens to be a station and have a traffic light and a river
flowing underneath, what are you going
NPE maps have always had major alignment problems which have seemed to
me to be worse in the eastern side of the country. There's also a new
problem, but I don't know whether it is in the JOSM WMS plugin, the tile
server or what.
Consider three JOSM screenshots:
On 06/10/2009 13:35, James Livingston wrote:
I can see things getting ickier than they are now if you can just go
around adding new shop= values, without having some prior discussion
to what it means. If I saw a suggested option in an editor, I would
generally assume that there is some
On 06/10/2009 14:09, John Smith wrote:
Some people are marking the landuse hard up against roads, but this
isn't correct since the property boundary never touches any roads, at
least none that I'm aware of, and foot paths etc use the same land use
area as roads.
I keep adjacent areas
On 05/10/2009 00:12, Egil Hjelmeland wrote:
As a mapper, I want a much more structured, well defined tagging scheme.
Steve started a discussion on the dev list in which I proposed just such
a scheme/schema. Since there's been several discussions on talk healding
in this direction, I'll send it
On 05/10/2009 11:43, Lester Caine wrote:
Rather than all these separate elements, tag values should form part of
the tagkey object, and descriptions can be added at any level. I need to
find the link to a good example, but
tag name='barrier' type='value' relevantto='node'
tagvalue
The problem is as follows:
You see an interpolation 25a to 25c. How do you know that this means
25a, 25b, 25c? You know by removing the number and then starting with
the a go through code points adding one until you reach c. Easy.
This will work for all alphabets where that are layed out in
On 02/10/2009 12:42, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/10/2 Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org:
No. The interpolation way has less nodes in it than houses. Thats the whole
point of having an interpolation way. Otherwise you'd just use those nodes
and tag them with the right house numbers and you are
On 30/09/2009 22:05, Roy Wallace wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 7:35 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com
wrote:
On 30/09/2009 10:20, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
you could model it like this (see attached, colours are just
indicating the ways, not highway-classes)
Yes, that's also what
On 01/10/2009 11:47, Roy Wallace wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:05 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
It shows visually which the main road is at the junction and is a good
model of the physical arrangement.
IMHO it does not *explicitly* show the continuations of roads
On 01/10/2009 13:51, Russ Nelson wrote:
Frederik Ramm writes:
Not at all. Russ has called for dictatorial leadership which the project
should follow even if there were absolutely nonsensical decisions.
WHOA!! I never said that. What I said was that if we can't choose,
as a community,
On 30/09/2009 10:20, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
you could model it like this (see attached, colours are just
indicating the ways, not highway-classes)
Yes, that's also what I typically do, e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.596517lon=0.376144zoom=18layers=B000FTF
Even though the kerb
On 30/09/2009 09:51, James Livingston wrote:
On 28/09/2009, at 2:22 PM, Marcus Wolschon wrote:
25A-25C should work with addr:interpolation=alphabetic .
However not all software that supports interpolation at all,
supports this interpolation-mode yet.
25-25A would not.
I'm not sure you how
On 28 Sep 2009, at 05:22, Marcus Wolschon mar...@wolschon.biz wrote:
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 7:33 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com
wrote:
I'm experimenting with adding house numbering for the first time (and
using the address interpolation plugin).
One common case I came across
On 28/09/2009 08:53, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Incidentally, as well as the possible OS contamination, the Council will
itself have database and content copyright in the data, so explicit
permission would be needed from them to incorporate and release it under
our CCBySA license. In obtaining
What plugin are you talking about?
The AdvancedAddressDB of Traveling Salesman?
Sorry, the AddrInterpolation plugin in JOSM.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/AddrInterpolation
which doesn't allow you to put just a number in the starting # field
when numbering scheme is set to
I'm experimenting with adding house numbering for the first time (and
using the address interpolation plugin).
One common case I came across was 25, 25A, 25B, ...
I wonder whether addr:interpolation=alphabetic could include this case
(in essence when the first node has no letter, the second
I notice that we now have this area
name = Cambridge
public_transport = pay_scale_area
ref = CAMBDGE
source = naptan_import
which looks like it delimits the area within which the Cambridge
megarider bus tickets are valid (Pay scale area is not a term in
public parlance).
Problem is,
On 26/09/2009 15:00, k...@vielevisels wrote:
Hi,
many people tag ways, which are incomplete and show just the beginning,
with the note (or FIXME) = stub. In the wiki, the tag noexit=no is
intended for this.
I think it would be helpful have one way to tag this and to render both
(dead-ends
On 26/09/2009 18:20, Dave F. wrote:
David Earl wrote:
On 26/09/2009 15:00, k...@vielevisels wrote:
Hi,
many people tag ways, which are incomplete and show just the
beginning, with the note (or FIXME) = stub. In the wiki, the tag
noexit=no is intended for this.
I think it would
On 26/09/2009 19:09, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
But as I said, I'd much rather have a specific, rendered, more to do
here tag for stubs that is removed when the way is extended.
not a good idea for the normal map. have you ever seen any other
commercial map with hey look this map is
As those of you paying attention will know, CycleStreets
(www.cyclestreets.net) is a routing and photo-map application for
cyclists based on OSM data.
It's primary developer is Simon Nuttall and he has been nominated for
TalkTalk's digital hero award, which offers a much needed £5K to help
On 25/09/2009 14:30, Dave F. wrote:
I had an email conversation with the mapping officer from my local
council. He intimated that the data relating to public rights of way,
and its associated copyright, would belong to the Local Council. When
they make a legal order to record a public right of
On 19/09/2009 07:30, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I have reverted the remaining edits so that, to my knowledge as per now,
not as single object should be in the state last modified by liam123.
Thank you very much for doing this.
David
___
Talk-GB mailing
On 18/09/2009 11:17, Lennard wrote:
And about removal/deactivation/hiding of Potlatch's live editing mode:
yes, please. We've had a case in Belgium as well, recently, of someone
dicking about in live mode, apparently unaware of the destructive nature
of their actions.
+1
But I don't think
Well done, and congratulations! I saw the feed come through earlier on
this morning and have been working through reviewing the changes in my area.
In my so far futile attempts to reload the namefinder index, I've found
the same thing - the time to reload seems to be exponential with the
size.
On 18/09/2009 12:13, Dave Stubbs wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Brian Prangle bpran...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I may be being a simpleton but can't we just disable write privileges for
this user to the database? Then he can continue editing but it all has no
effect
If somebody
Two changesets:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2510163 reverted cleanly
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2510485 failed to revert
410 gone - I suspect there was a node/way changed in the second
changeset that was also in the first.
The automatic reversion is
On 17/09/2009 14:09, Peter Miller wrote:
Who would join a 'talk-counter_vandalism' list or support its creation?
Yes. But can we call it something less judgemental: not all incorrect
changes are vandalism, and people seeing their account names on such a
list would be most depressing.
On 17/09/2009 14:30, Peter Miller wrote:
Possibly a different name would be clearer
talk-Counter_vandalism_tools, but that is getting a bit long. Any other
ideas or feedback?
talk-reversion-tools?
___
Talk-GB mailing list
On 15/09/2009 16:47, Jonas Svensson wrote:
Besides check all those edits, what would be the best way to see if
there are any changes in my area by that person? I have found one
bad edit so far.
Set up a RSS feed from ITO's OSM Mapper at
http://www.itoworld.com/product/osm/map
That way you
On 15/09/2009 00:59, Lennard wrote:
David Earl wrote:
Unfortunately, I can't use the revert script to rever this. Though the
edits are all his, the same way appears twice in the same changeset
and this seems to upset Frederick's script. I don't know whether it is
a bug or not.
He
On 14/09/2009 22:30, Someoneelse wrote:
I notice that liam123's been editing in SE London again tonight. Seems
to consist of lots of oneway=yes changed to oneway=no, among others.
Unfortunately, I can't use the revert script to rever this. Though the
edits are all his, the same way appears
I have now reverted this changeset - it went through cleanly and easily.
BTW for reverts I do I'm using a different user id from my usual -
GuardianAngel is me with a different hat on.
I wonder whether you could contact him again Peter and find out what he
did that led him to believe he wasn't
On 10/09/2009 09:44, Roy Wallace wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:02 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com
wrote:
On 10/09/2009 01:11, Roy Wallace wrote:
But I would support any proposal that merges these and includes
complementary tags to explicitly specify differences as necessary
On 10/09/2009 10:02, David Earl wrote:
On 10/09/2009 09:44, Roy Wallace wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:02 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com
wrote:
On 10/09/2009 01:11, Roy Wallace wrote:
But I would support any proposal that merges these and includes
complementary tags
On 09/09/2009 00:10, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
David Earl wrote:
Richard - why do we still need this mode now you can save in
Potlatch and groups of changes fit much better with changesets
anyway?
Lots of people still prefer it. I've not seen any evidence of people
mistakenly selecting
On 09/09/2009 21:43, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Is grave_yard tag used? I don't see it in JOSM. Why is the wiki so
confusing for this simple thing to map.
I think the original distinction was that a graveyard is the burial
ground around a church, while a cemetery is a separate pice of land set
On 09/09/2009 12:07, Pieren wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Tom Hughest...@compton.nu wrote:
Because (in the EU) Database Right kicks in and prohibits substantial
extraction.
Tom
If someone starts to copy the photos themselves, yes you are right.
But here, we speak about reading a
On 08/09/2009 13:06, Liz wrote:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Shaun McDonald wrote:
I'm not going to waste my time updating a source tag on every node,
way or relation that I touch. However I'm happy to add ti to the
changeset where it belongs.
It's actually quite easy in JOSM
you mass select
101 - 200 of 529 matches
Mail list logo
