On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:38:20 +0530
Vikas Yadav vikas.ya...@threebrix.com wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to add name:bn: কলকাতা to KolKata/Calcutta but JOSM shows me
boxes.
I install all fonts and my gedit renders correctly and also the browser (the
wikipedia page for kolkata where I took the
Richard Fairhurst schrieb:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
the German community takes offence at user:chriscf's deletion
of the smoothness voting result from approved features and
moving it to rejected features in spite of of there having been
a proper vote with an approved outcome.
Then the
Am Samstag 31 Januar 2009 10:32:04 schrieb Peter Vitt:
Hello List,
On talk-de we had a discussion about relations, especially routes, and
roundabouts the other day.
The topic was: How to integrate a roundabout into a relation.
For now we have three different approaches:
1) Leave the
2009/1/31 Peter Vitt pe...@dotnetphen.com:
Hello List,
On talk-de we had a discussion about relations, especially routes, and
roundabouts the other day.
The topic was: How to integrate a roundabout into a relation.
For now we have three different approaches:
1) Leave the roundabout
(Forwarding to list)
-- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --
Betreff: Re: [OSM-talk] How to integrate a roundabout into a relation
Datum: Samstag 31 Januar 2009
Von: Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk
An: Marc Schütz schue...@gmx.net
Marc Schütz wrote:
Am Samstag 31 Januar 2009 10:32:04
Ah, the edit war on the wiki is back.
Chris has had the courage of his convictions to stand up against an utterly
ridiculous tag,
ridiculous tag, I agree. But I see a long list of other ridiculous
tags in the db and in the wiki. Do you need examples ?
thereby pointing out the flaws in a
What I mean is the tiles 6-11 for example (the non-default of TAH
client). Those don't get updated on Wednesday or even after 2 weeks of
monitoring.
On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 00:40 -0500, Russ Nelson wrote:
I'm far from being expert, but it sure looks like when my t...@h instance
downloads a tile
Hi!
Richard Fairhurst schrieb:
Chris has had the courage of his convictions to stand up against an utterly
ridiculous tag, thereby pointing out the flaws in a voting system which a
lot of us are silently unhappy with. Good luck to him.
Maybe I am misreading your lines, but to me they sound
(Nop's e-mail went to me rather than the list but I'm guessing that
was a mistake - and he probably expressed the other side best)
Nop wrote:
I would consider it the basic principle of democracy/a community
that things established by vote need to be changed by vote, even if
the need for
Thanks Gora!
Potlatch could be a good alternative to certain POI/faster edits.
2009/1/31 Gora Mohanty g...@sarai.net
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:38:20 +0530
Vikas Yadav vikas.ya...@threebrix.com wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to add name:bn: কলকাতা to KolKata/Calcutta but JOSM shows me
boxes.
Pieren schrieb:
The problem here is that Chriscf just wants to avoid that this tag is
used by others and never proposed some alternative solutions.
The current voting is 19 yes and 10 no.
If Chriscf cannot convince at least another 10 people to oppose this
proposal, he must face the fact that
No luck!
Even potlatch is showing boxes for bengali.
Its worse cause even Hindi is boxed.
Btw, when I do save the properties the with all those boxes, do box
characters go to OSM or the unicode characters of that I actually pasted?
2009/1/31 ビカス ヤダワ (vikas yadav) mevi...@gmail.com
Thanks
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Richard Fairhurst
rich...@systemed.net wrote:
I'm starting to wonder about a Tags I Use system.
How should I tag this is one of the most commonly asked questions.
The wiki vote system works as a good system for commenting on
proposals,you system does not help
I think mapfeatures is the problem. Not only socially (this tag must
be in mapfeatures) but technically (wikiload). So remove mapfeatures
as first step.
Very wrong. It is the only way for a newbie to have the slightest idea on
how to tag anything.
IMHO, the problem is too much democracy. 29
2009/1/31 Sven Rautenberg s...@rtbg.de:
Pieren schrieb:
The problem here is that Chriscf just wants to avoid that this tag is
used by others and never proposed some alternative solutions.
The current voting is 19 yes and 10 no.
If Chriscf cannot convince at least another 10 people to oppose
Richard Fairhurst schrieb:
With smoothness that's gone out of the window. As far as I'm
concerned, with the approval of smoothness=very_horrible (come
_on_!), all bets are off. The voting system has just voted itself
into irrelevance.
I take it that you oppose this tag. Why haven't you
Hi Guys,
I would love to start mapping, and have used both both the JOSM editor
and Potlatch a small amount, and found the tags the most complicated
feature. I can cope with nodes, open closed ways etc no problem, but
understanding the difference between all the tags and using the right
tags
Hi!
Richard Fairhurst schrieb:
(Nop's e-mail went to me rather than the list but I'm guessing that was
a mistake - and he probably expressed the other side best)
Well, this is the crux of it. I'm not convinced the form of democracy we
have in the tag voting is at all helpful.
The
What I like about the tag voting system is the discussion. The
discussion pages around a tag proposal are often quite useful - often
more so than the main page on the tag. The number of times a tag
proposal has been improved from the original proposal after discussion
suggests that any system
Nop wrote:
So a good vote needs a better system and considerably more attention.
But just because people have not been paying attention when asked to
contribute does not give them the right to overrule those who did.
A good system for reaching consensus is based on discussion, not mere
Features. Also, they'll only do that if they're trying to add
something that doesn't seem to be in Potlatch's drop-down lists.
Probably very true. That makes the editors holding at least as much power
as the wiki features page.
___
talk mailing
Hi,
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
The problem is that people vote on tags:
- without knowing anything about the subject
- without ever having mapped the feature in question
- without any intention of ever mapping the feature in question
This is my main complaint about the voting system too. But
Hi,
Nop wrote:
I would consider it the basic principle of democracy/a community that
things established by vote need to be changed by vote, even if the need
for change is obvious.
Democracy usually means that the vote results decide something. (At
least in its textbook form it does.)
This
Marc Schütz wrote:
Am Samstag 31 Januar 2009 10:32:04 schrieb Peter Vitt:
Hello List,
On talk-de we had a discussion about relations, especially routes, and
roundabouts the other day.
The topic was: How to integrate a roundabout into a relation.
For now we have three different approaches:
On Saturday 31 January 2009, Lester Caine wrote:
Marc Schütz wrote:
4) Split the roundabout as needed, tag all parts as
junction=roundabout (don't use a roundabout relation), and add only
the needed parts into the route.
5) Properly define a relation so that it does not need to know every
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
Hi,
Nop wrote:
I would consider it the basic principle of democracy/a community that
things established by vote need to be changed by vote, even if the need
for change is obvious.
Democracy usually means that the vote results decide something. (At
least in its
Frederik Ramm wrote:
This is my main complaint about the voting system too. But
in the specific case of smoothness, it seems to me that
there is probably nobody here who can be said to not know
anything about the subject
Disagree strongly - it depends entirely where you're mapping. I
Erik Johansson wrote:
How should I tag this is one of the most commonly asked
questions. The wiki vote system works as a good system for
commenting on proposals,you system does not help this.
Sure it does - Talk: pages. Or even a tagging@ list. You don't need a system
to have discussion, it
Sven Rautenberg wrote:
I take it that you oppose this tag. Why haven't you said so in
the voting section until now?
For the same reason that no-one on talk-de ever submits any patches to
Potlatch?
( :) too)
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
Pieren Pieren wrote:
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
The problem is that people vote on tags:
- without knowing anything about the subject
- without ever having mapped the feature in question
- without any intention of ever mapping the feature in question
Wow, then you are against the principle of
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Erik Johansson wrote:
How should I tag this is one of the most commonly asked
questions. The wiki vote system works as a good system for
commenting on proposals,you system does not help this.
Sure it does - Talk:
2009/1/30 Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com:
LeedsTracker schrieb:
Hello all
How should covered reservoirs be tagged?
I noticed man_made=reservoir_covered is in the JOSM presets and map
features, though a page doesn't exist for it.
IIRC, the man_made=reservoir_covered was existing
Jonathan Bennett schrieb:
A good system for reaching consensus is based on discussion, not mere
voting.
I agree. However, our system _is_ mostly based on discussion. The
propsal + RFC process serves this very purpose: Present ideas, discuss
them and improve them based on discussion.
The vote
Nop wrote:
Well, you are proposing a differnt kind of vote by usage of tags.
Not solely. Lemme explain.
At present, we have Tagwatch, which just lists usage per tag. I'm suggesting
(just as a half-baked idea) that we have a sort of floaty
cloud-Tagwatch-on-steroids. So you might have:
Hi!
Richard Fairhurst schrieb:
Sven Rautenberg wrote:
I take it that you oppose this tag. Why haven't you said so in
the voting section until now?
For the same reason that no-one on talk-de ever submits any patches to
Potlatch?
They don't patch.
But they also don't object to other
Nop schrieb:
- Newbie is enthusiastic, wants to contribute and studies the Wiki
- After a little mapping, he has an idea, finds the proposal system and
spends a lot of time working out a nice proposal, discussing and
refining it
- Then comes the point he finds out that all this work doesn't
Nop schrieb:
- Newbie is enthusiastic, wants to contribute and studies the Wiki
- After a little mapping, he has an idea, finds the proposal system
and
spends a lot of time working out a nice proposal, discussing and
refining it
- Then comes the point he finds out that all this work
hi,
please have a look here
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:GroundTruth#Problems for some
weird results on my etrex legend HCx out of ground truth. Any idea?
Thanks
Gerhard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
I would suggest the following changes in the wiki:
- replace vote by opinion poll
- replace I approve/I oppose by I like it/I don't like it
- replace approved feature status by valuable
- split the map features page in two parts core map features for
well established tags (e.g. used by more thant
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.netwrote:
Disagree strongly - it depends entirely where you're mapping. I doubt I've
ever come across anywhere where smoothness= might be relevant while mapping
Burton-on-Trent (well, maybe one road which the flipping Gas
Richard Fairhurst skrev:
The important thing is that there is no prescription. No rejected. No
approved. Just easy-to-use documentation of what people are using, why. If
you feel a need for a particular tag, start using it, and document it. If
the tag is good, it'll catch on. It's much more
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Lars Aronsson l...@aronsson.se wrote:
Pieren wrote:
I would suggest the following changes in the wiki:
- replace vote by opinion poll
This would probably be a step in the right direction. But why
have a poll at all, where you count the number of
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 05:45:11PM +, Thomas Wood wrote:
2009/1/31 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
I would suggest the following changes in the wiki:
- replace vote by opinion poll
- replace I approve/I oppose by I like it/I don't like it
- replace approved feature status by valuable
-
Hi!
Russ Nelson schrieb:
Is there any voluntary community in which this does not happen? There
will always be people who have good ideas who are unable to convince
other people of the correctness of their ideas. See, for example,
Galileo.
The point was that those people are being
Hi!
Pieren schrieb:
I would suggest the following changes in the wiki:
- replace vote by opinion poll
- replace I approve/I oppose by I like it/I don't like it
- replace approved feature status by valuable
- split the map features page in two parts core map features for
well established
Hi!
Lars Aronsson schrieb:
I would suggest the following changes in the wiki:
- replace vote by opinion poll
This would probably be a step in the right direction. But why
have a poll at all, where you count the number of people/votes?
Wouldn't it be better to ask for a number of
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 07:01:17PM +0100, Lars Aronsson wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to ask for a number of arguments for or
against a proposal? Then people would have to contribute more
arguments, instead of more votes.
This is ultimately more desirable. Wikipedia has a policy that
Le 31 janv. 09 à 19:23, Pieren a écrit :
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Lars Aronsson l...@aronsson.se
wrote:
Pieren wrote:
I would suggest the following changes in the wiki:
- replace vote by opinion poll
This would probably be a step in the right direction. But why
have a poll at
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Lars Aronsson l...@aronsson.se wrote:
Among the arguments could be: This or that tag is already used in
X number of places in OSM.
That kind of crazy idea gets you nowhere against the wiki-fiddlers,
c.f. previous discussions regarding crossing=
Cheers,
Andy
I think the page needs to be put back to the regular map features standard.
English is an odd language. There are many acceptions to the rule.
This is one of them.
Technically, this tag follows the rule of {{tag|key|value}} where
'excellant', 'good', 'bad', 'horrible'. Are all descriptives of
Good means different things to different users. A racing cyclist,
touring cyclist, and trail/mtb cyclist will all have difference views.
These will be even more different to a wheelchair user, hiker, 4x4
vehicle driver, smart car driver, and a tractor driver. More
importantly take any one
Vikas Yadav vikas.ya...@threebrix.com writes:
Just a casual query about what is the schedule to render TAH tiles below
z12.
I had changed many things in North India maps and those zoom levels still
show tiles.
They get stitched togetcher from z12 tiles after the rendering of a
z12 tiles was
On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 22:57 -0500, Matthias Julius wrote:
Vikas Yadav vikas.ya...@threebrix.com writes:
Just a casual query about what is the schedule to render TAH tiles below
z12.
I had changed many things in North India maps and those zoom levels still
show tiles.
They get
La situazione, come noto, non è chiara [1]. Per ora prefrisco non
specificare alcun tag.
Grazie a tutti!
Fabrizio
[1] http://www.ecquologia.it/cms/content/view/1405/28/
-Messaggio originale-
Da: talk-it-boun...@openstreetmap.org
[mailto:talk-it-boun...@openstreetmap.org]per conto di
Ciao a tutti,
a quando un meeting dei mappers pugliesi?
Giusto per avere il piacere di conoscere di persona quelle brave persone
che mi correggono tutte le strade :-
Va bene anche una pizza serale, meglio se allargata alle rispettive
famiglie.
In attesa di commenti...
Ciao
/niubii/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciao Niubii,
mi hai battuto sul tempo, ho avuto la stessa idea. Per quanto mi
riguarda, per motivi logistici preferirei organizzarla dopo la fine
degli esami all'università, a marzo... ma sostanzialmente qualsiasi data
di febbraio per me va benissimo.
Il problema è che gli shape sono un po' disomogenei a causa delle differenti
specifiche assegnate alle ditte appaltatrici per la creazione della CTRN. Di
solito i tagli dei vari appalti ricalcano uno o più fogli 1:5.
Qualche mese fa, mi son divertito a cercare di creare degli shape
monoblocco
Salve a tutti,
ho visto che i server di OSM questo pomeriggio sono stati giù per un po'
e a seguito di alcune email che sono passate sulla mailinglist inglese,
sopratutto quella concernente aspetti legali, è bastato per rendermi inquieto.
Spero che qualcuno abbia seguito questa vicenda meglio di
Ciao Simone,
purtroppo non posso mitigare molto le tue preoccupazioni per quelle che
sono le mie informazioni (che non sono tante, la discussione va avanti
da un anno, se ne parlava anche al SOTM08 di Luglio scorso).
A quanto ne so la foundation sta facendo le sue decisioni a porte
chiuse,
concordo pienamente con Mario, sono ottimista anch'io. Da quanto io ho
capito nella ML legal (che ne anch'io ho seguito molto attento), e da
qualche rapporto in comunitá penso, che siamo cmq ad un punto critico,
ma non si sa ancora nulla. Ne anch' io vorrei accetare una licenza che
po essere
Le preoccupazioni ci sono, a me preoccupano soprattutto a causa del
silenzio di alcune persone e sulla oscurità sulla licenza; ovviamente
non sono intimorito dal fatto perchè alla peggio ci sarà un fork!
perciò bisogna fare qualche dump ogni tanto ;-)
ciao
Luca
Estensione (ancora sperimentale) per visualizzare un luogo su OSM: basta
evidenziare il nome e cliccare su Show on OpenStreetMap.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/janmantkowski/diary/4936
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/10531
iiizio
simone.gad...@jrc.it ha scritto:
Salve a tutti,
ho visto che i server di OSM questo pomeriggio sono stati giù per un po'
e a seguito di alcune email che sono passate sulla mailinglist inglese,
sopratutto quella concernente aspetti legali, è bastato per rendermi inquieto.
Spero che qualcuno
Alberto Riva ha scritto:
Il problema è che gli shape sono un po' disomogenei a causa delle
differenti specifiche assegnate alle ditte appaltatrici per la
creazione della CTRN. Di solito i tagli dei vari appalti ricalcano uno
o più fogli 1:5.
Qualche mese fa, mi son divertito a cercare
Die admin_levels, die im Wiki eingetragen wurden [1], wurden zwar vermutlich
beim letzten Treffen besprochen, möchte aber dennoch meinen Senf dazu geben:
Wie ich bereits auf der zugehörigen Diskussionsseite [2] festgehalten habe,
fehlen die Grenzen für politische Exposituren [3] (Bad Aussee und
Michael Cole wrote, On Thursday, January 29, 2009 03:57 PM:
On Thursday 29 January 2009 01:08:55 Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
Can we get a head count of who plans to go as well?
Looking like Makati ... In terms of venue, I don't really mind as long as there
is cold beer. Also generally prefer
zumindest in Vorstadtbereichen mit Bahnhöfen, die dem ÖPNV dienen, sind
oft Bahnsteige so an das örtliche Wegenetz angebunden, dass sie häufig
auch von Nicht-Fahrgästen genutzt werden.
Wir haben den Tag railway=platform.
Der wird aber bisher nicht ausgewertet/gezeichnet. Daher hängen die zum
Hallo,
Norbert Kück wrote:
Wir haben den Tag railway=platform.
Als Fläche oder als Linie?
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Am Freitag 30 Januar 2009 21:58:48 schrieb Toni Erdmann:
Stefan Leupers schrieb:
Hallo zusammen!
...
Habe gerade zufällig gesehen, dass die Insel Herrenchiemsee in Bayern
sowohl auf der ÖPNV-Karte als auch auf der Cyclemap zum Teil überflutet
aussieht. :-(
...
Soweit ich gesehen
2009/1/31 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
Hallo,
Norbert Kück wrote:
Wir haben den Tag railway=platform.
Als Fläche oder als Linie?
Wenn ich das richtig sehe, wird momentan weder Linie, noch Fläche gerendert.
Hier:
Bernd Wurst schrieb:
Am Samstag, 31. Januar 2009 schrieb Stephan Wolff:
Am Ende stellt Osmarender den Bach in gerundeten Schleifen dar und führt
ihn komplett an der Minibrücke vorbei.
Das kannst du einfach beheben in dem du den Bachlauf an der Stelle genauer
einträgst, also zwei nodes
Stephan Wolff wrote:
Moin,
immer wenn ich sehr kurze Brücken eingeben muss, ärgere ich mich über
das umständliche Verfahren. Als kurze Brücken würde ist solche unter
5 Meter Länge verstehen.
Ich gebe solche Brücken überhaupt nicht ein. Bach Layer=-1 und Straße
Layer=0 und alles wird korrekt
Marc Schütz schrieb:
Am Freitag 30 Januar 2009 21:58:48 schrieb Toni Erdmann:
Stefan Leupers schrieb:
Hallo zusammen!
...
Habe gerade zufällig gesehen, dass die Insel Herrenchiemsee in Bayern
sowohl auf der ÖPNV-Karte als auch auf der Cyclemap zum Teil überflutet
aussieht. :-(
...
Am Samstag 31 Januar 2009 12:19:40 schrieb Stefan Hirschmann:
Stephan Wolff wrote:
Moin,
immer wenn ich sehr kurze Brücken eingeben muss, ärgere ich mich über
das umständliche Verfahren. Als kurze Brücken würde ist solche unter
5 Meter Länge verstehen.
Ich gebe solche Brücken
Stefan Hirschmann schrieb:
Ich gebe solche Brücken überhaupt nicht ein. Bach Layer=-1 und Straße
Layer=0 und alles wird korrekt dargestlelt und sogar der Validator ist
zufrieden.
An den Bach gehört kein Layer=-1 ran. Grundsätzlich nicht. Weil der
Layer dann nämlich gern pauschal an den
Tobias Wendorff schrieb:
Schwupps ... die haben nur die kurze Version online.
Kann man jemand vielleicht für Leute ohne Fernseher erklären, was hier
das Problem ist?
Warum Schamesröte? Haben die RTL-Nachrichten irgendwas schlechtes über
OSM berichtet, was nicht direkt abzustreiten ist? Oder
Hallo,
Warum Schamesröte?
Stimmt. Wenn Die Lizenz es nun mal alles zulässt, dann muss man auch
mit unseriösen Nutzern rechnen. Verstehe die Aufregung auch nicht.
Vielmehr müssten wir uns überlegen, wie man durch seriöse und leicht
bedienbare Anwendungen OSM bekannter macht, damit endlich auch
Hatto von Hatzfeld schrieb:
Schon seit einiger Zeit habe ich einen Tag gesucht, mit dem sich erfassen
lässt, ob ein Weg z.B. mit Inline-Skates oder mit einem Rennrad befahren
lässt. Vor kurzem bin ich auf den Tag smoothness gestoßen, der mir dafür
auch recht geeignet scheint, da er angeben
Sven Rautenberg schrieb:
Stefan Hirschmann schrieb:
Ich gebe solche Brücken überhaupt nicht ein. Bach Layer=-1 und Straße
Layer=0 und alles wird korrekt dargestlelt und sogar der Validator ist
zufrieden.
An den Bach gehört kein Layer=-1 ran. Grundsätzlich nicht. Weil der
Layer dann nämlich
Ulf Lamping schrieb:
Mario Salvini schrieb:
Ulf Lamping schrieb:
Aber bitte nicht im Nebensatz neue Behauptungen aufstellen:
Wenn du 2 Einbahnstraßen draus machts, brauchst du keine
turn-restrictions zusätzlich anzulegen.
Die ergeben sich automatisch aus den Einbahnstraßen und
Arne Bischoff schrieb:
Warum Schamesröte?
Stimmt. Wenn Die Lizenz es nun mal alles zulässt, dann muss man auch
mit unseriösen Nutzern rechnen.
Ich verstehe immernoch das Problem nicht.
Was ist wo unseriös?
-jha-
___
Talk-de mailing list
Am 30. Januar 2009 23:15 schrieb Bernd Raichle be...@dante.de:
Ein Winkel verbietet nichts, da man ja beim Mappen Flaechen zu
Kanten vereinfacht. Und da kann leicht aus einer Kreuzung mit
ausreichendem Abbiegeraum im Kantenmodell etwas sehr spitzwinkliges
werden.
ganz genau, der Winkel
Hallo,
Johann H. Addicks wrote:
Was ist wo unseriös?
Jamba ist ein Unternehmen, das Teenies ihr Taschengeld mit
Handyklingeltoenen usw. aus der Tasche zieht und dabei keine Tricks
ungenutzt laesst (einmal nicht aufgepasst, schon hast Du ein
drei-Monats-Klingelton-Abo gekauft usw.) -
ganz genau, der Winkel ist kein Kriterium, ich kann Dir auch spontan
eine Stelle zeigen, wo man überhaupt nur spitzwinklig eine Straße
erreichen kann, z.B. hier:
Hallo.
Am Samstag, 31. Januar 2009 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
ganz genau, der Winkel ist kein Kriterium, ich kann Dir auch spontan
eine Stelle zeigen, wo man überhaupt nur spitzwinklig eine Straße
erreichen kann, z.B. hier:
[...]
Du kannst hier nur aus der Via Latina (einbahnstr.) in die
Mario Salvini schrieb:
Ulf Lamping schrieb:
Wenn du hier ein Wendeverbot meinen solltest:
Entweder beim Adalbertsteinweg steht das Zeichen Wendevebot[1] oder es
steht da nicht. Das sollte das Kriterium sein, ob man eine
turn-restriction setzt.
Oder meinst du was anderes?!?
diese Ampel
Hallo Bernd,
Leider gibt es bei den meisten Wegen keinen vor Ort erkennbaren Namen.
Und sich deshalb beim Albverein um Infomaterial zu bemühen
ist dann doch wirklich Arbeit. :)
Für die Wanderwege des Fränkischen Albvereins steht das Verzeichnis der
Wanderwege zur Verfügung. Die Inhalte
Hi !
nachdem vor einigen Tagen Gerrit einen Vorschlag für die Erfassung von
Bushaltestellen [1] gemacht hat ist Lübeck von ihm als Testgebiet
ausgesucht worden.
Danach werden dann auch NODES als Platformen für die Bushaltestelle
verwendet ! Sollte somit auch Berücksichtigung finden !
Gruß
Es gibt eine schmale Straße durch den Wald, Name Wartenbergweg,
Gesamtlänge ca. 1 km. Der erste Teil ist eine außerörtliche
unclassified-Straße mit freier Durchfahrt. Dann kommt ein Abschnitt
mit gleicher Breite und gleichem Belag, dort dürfen nur Anlieger durch.
Daran schließt sich ein
Hi!
Johannes Haller schrieb:
Macht es Sinn, diese Abschnitte zu einer Relation Wartenbergweg
zusammenzufassen? Oder ist so etwas nicht nötig und/oder nicht üblich?
Derzeit macht es keinen Unterschied, es wird meines Wissens von
jeglicher Software ignoriert.
Nachdem es schwer vorherzusagen
Hallo zusammen,
gibt es einen Konsenz für oder gegen die Aufnahme von Hausnummern in
Straßennamen?
An der Straße gibt es ja die öfter Schilder in abgehende Wege wie
Beispielstraße 25-31. Anscheinend nehmen manche User die Regel die
Namen zu schreiben wie auf den Schildern angegeben wortwörtlich.
Hallo.
Am Samstag, 31. Januar 2009 schrieb Johannes Haller:
Es gibt eine schmale Straße durch den Wald, Name Wartenbergweg,
Gesamtlänge ca. 1 km. Der erste Teil ist eine außerörtliche
unclassified-Straße mit freier Durchfahrt. Dann kommt ein Abschnitt
mit gleicher Breite und gleichem Belag,
Hallo.
Am Samstag, 31. Januar 2009 schrieb Rolf Bode-Meyer:
An der Straße gibt es ja die öfter Schilder in abgehende Wege wie
Beispielstraße 25-31. Anscheinend nehmen manche User die Regel die
Namen zu schreiben wie auf den Schildern angegeben wortwörtlich.
Ich find's Blödsinn, lösche aber
Jan Tappenbeck schrieb:
nachdem vor einigen Tagen Gerrit einen Vorschlag für die Erfassung von
Bushaltestellen [1] gemacht hat ist Lübeck von ihm als Testgebiet
ausgesucht worden.
Danach werden dann auch NODES als Platformen für die Bushaltestelle
verwendet ! Sollte somit auch
Rolf Bode-Meyer schrieb:
Hallo zusammen,
gibt es einen Konsenz für oder gegen die Aufnahme von Hausnummern in
Straßennamen?
An der Straße gibt es ja die öfter Schilder in abgehende Wege wie
Beispielstraße 25-31. Anscheinend nehmen manche User die Regel die
Namen zu schreiben wie auf den
Hi,
Am 31. Januar 2009 17:56 schrieb Sebastian Hohmann m...@s-hohmann.de:
Rolf Bode-Meyer schrieb:
An der Straße gibt es ja die öfter Schilder in abgehende Wege wie
Beispielstraße 25-31. Anscheinend nehmen manche User die Regel die
Namen zu schreiben wie auf den Schildern angegeben
Nop schrieb:
Hi!
Johannes Haller schrieb:
Macht es Sinn, diese Abschnitte zu einer Relation Wartenbergweg
zusammenzufassen? Oder ist so etwas nicht nötig und/oder nicht üblich?
Derzeit macht es keinen Unterschied, es wird meines Wissens von
jeglicher Software ignoriert.
Nachdem es
hi,
schaut mal hier
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:GroundTruth#Problems für einige
eigenartige ergebnisse auf meinem etrex legend HCx. generiert mit
groundtruth. jemand eine idee?
danke
gerhard
___
Talk-de mailing list
Stephan Wolff schrieb:
...
Als Vereinfachung könnte man vereinbaren, dass Highway und waterway
immer mit einer Brücke kreuzen, wenn nicht highway=ford angegeben ist.
Gleiches könnte man für Autobahn und Feldweg/Fussweg/... vereinbaren,
müsste aber dann zumindest über ein layer-Tag die Lage
Hallo zusammen.
Ich hatte ja die letzten Wochen bereits ab und zu etwas dazu geschrieben.
Inzwischen habe ich eine ganze Anzahl von Bus-/Tram und Bahn-Strecken
eingetragen und dabei (wenn ich damit nicht zuviel bestehendes kaputt
mache) ein neues Schema zum Eintragen von Haltestellen verwendet.
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
