Re: [OSM-talk-fr] projet du mois : limite de vitesse 80/90 ?

Le lun. 13 août 2018 à 23:10, a écrit : > Bonjour les Jérôme et les autres, > Bon résumé Jérôme Amagat mais une erreur refaite par ton homonyme : > Le 13/08/2018 à 10:16, Jérôme Seigneuret - jerome.seigneu...@gmail.com a > écrit : > > Comme la notion de séparateurs sur les voies simple n'existe

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] source:maxspeed <> maxspeed:type

Le 14/08/2018 à 00:06, marc marc - marc_marc_...@hotmail.com a écrit : source: est un préfixe pour la catégorisation des sources. source:name:br indique par exemple l'origine du name:br. (complètement inutile sur l'objet) source vaudra dans ce cas survey ou imagery ou mapillary ou local

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] source:maxspeed <> maxspeed:type

Le 13. 08. 18 à 01:02, osm.sanspourr...@spamgourmet.com a écrit : >>> source:maxspeed >> il me semblait qu'on était entrain de migrer ces vieux >> source:maxspeed conflictuel en maxspeed:type >> j'ai même lancé une discussion pour une édition mécanique à l'échelle >> de la France qui n'a jusqu'à

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] projet du mois : limite de vitesse 80/90 ?

Bonjour les Jérôme et les autres, Bon résumé Jérôme Amagat mais une erreur refaite par ton homonyme : Le 13/08/2018 à 10:16, Jérôme Seigneuret - jerome.seigneu...@gmail.com a écrit : Comme la notion de séparateurs sur les voies simple n'existe pas vraiment hors relation on a un linéaire pour

Re: [talk-au] City of Gold Coast / repeat requests of CC BY waivers

On 13 August 2018 at 17:44, Simon Poole wrote: > Could naturally be, they didn't give me details, so it is a bit difficult > to find out what has gone wrong (if anything). I can follow up with them, > maybe something simply got lost in the mail. > > Thanks Simon, that would be good if you can

Re: [Talk-de] Wege des WSV an den Kanälen / tagging

On Monday 13 August 2018, Florian Lohoff wrote: > [...] > > Wasserwirtschaft bedeutet hier nämlich nicht Verkehrswege im Sinne > des "Bundeswasserstraßengesetzes" sondern im Sinne der (Landes) > "Wasserwirtschaftsgesetze" > > Damit geht es um die Erschließung von Wassergewinnungsgebieten und >

Re: [Talk-cz] geograficke regiony v CR

Souhlasím s Milanem. Je to velká ostuda. A s bodem aspoň odpadne problém s přesnou definicí hranice. A když se v budoucnu nějaká data přece jen uvolní, není problém bod předělat na relaci. Michal Dne 13.08.2018 v 21:32 Milan Cerny napsal(a): Jen pro zajímavost jsem zadal do hledání v OSM

Re: [Talk-cz] geograficke regiony v CR

Jen pro zajímavost jsem zadal do hledání v OSM slovo "Šumava" a vypadla na mě spousta pekáren Šumava v Liberci a okolí, zastávka autobusu v ČB, kino Šumava, ale o pohoří či oblasti ani zmínka. Stejně tak "Brdy", jen kopec u Kopřivnice. To mi připadá hodně špatně. Pohledem "z venku", proč

Re: [Talk-GB] Royal Mail trialling 'parcel' post boxes

The photo in the Leicester Mercury and, I think RM publicity, is of this location on Abington Street, Northampton. The distinctive name of the chip shop helped. Jerry On 13 August 2018 at 19:16, Philip Barnes wrote: >

Re: [Talk-GB] Royal Mail trialling 'parcel' post boxes

Locations listted in this article https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/royal-mail-postboxes-take-parcels-1892430 Will get to survey the Elland Road one in the next couple of weeks. Phil (trigpoint) On 13/08/2018 13:48, SK53 wrote: Press release:

Re: [OSM-talk] Is it technically and legally possible to add the Open Location Code to the OSM search?

W dniu 13.08.2018 o 19:23, Frederik Ramm pisze: > Which code would you then add to a building? I guess I was not clear enough. I meant only the case when there is proper sign on the building, I would tag it as an address then. Then and only then. It's perfectly verifiable and I don't have to

Re: [OSM-talk] Is it technically and legally possible to add the Open Location Code to the OSM search?

Currently if I wish to send a letter or a package to someone I send it to John Smith @ 110 main street. OLC codes replaces 110 main street but it does have limitations but John smith @ OLC code should get it close enough to be delivered. The other issue is there are just the odd one or two

Re: [OSM-talk] Is it technically and legally possible to add the Open Location Code to the OSM search?

On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 1:23 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > On 08/13/2018 06:46 PM, Daniel Koć wrote: >>> I also don't see a reason to add the OLC codes in tags in the >>> database, even if marked on a building. > >> Since buildings are not guaranteed to fit into OLC rectangles and they >>

Re: [OSM-talk] Is it technically and legally possible to add the Open Location Code to the OSM search?

Am 13.08.2018 um 18:46 schrieb Daniel Koć: > W dniu 13.08.2018 o 18:37, Jo pisze: > >> I also don't see a reason to add the OLC codes in tags in the >> database, even if marked on a building. > Since buildings are not guaranteed to fit into OLC rectangles and they > not 1:1 compatible, this

Re: [Talk-cz] geograficke regiony v CR

2018-08-13 12:29 GMT+02:00 majka : > Troufám si tvrdit, že jde jen o to, koho se zeptat. V daném případě žáka > základní školy > , > případně jeho rodičů. > (...) > > Jen netuším, jestli "učí se to ve škole" je

Re: [OSM-talk] Is it technically and legally possible to add the Open Location Code to the OSM search?

On 13.08.18 19:46, Daniel Koć wrote: W dniu 13.08.2018 o 18:37, Jo pisze: I also don't see a reason to add the OLC codes in tags in the database, even if marked on a building. Since buildings are not guaranteed to fit into OLC rectangles and they not 1:1 compatible, this usage makes sense for

Re: [Talk-cz] geograficke regiony v CR

Ahoj, 2018-08-13 12:12 GMT+02:00 Petr Vozdecký : > mohu se mylit, ale proc je dulezite to "on the ground"? Je spousta > polozek, ktere se nedaji pouhou navstevou mista zjistit, je nutne dalsi > zjistovani a patrani. > protože co nelze v terénu najít, to nemá v {OSM} mapě místo. Sice to nemůžu

Re: [OSM-talk] Is it technically and legally possible to add the Open Location Code to the OSM search?

Hi, On 08/13/2018 06:46 PM, Daniel Koć wrote: >> I also don't see a reason to add the OLC codes in tags in the >> database, even if marked on a building. > Since buildings are not guaranteed to fit into OLC rectangles and they > not 1:1 compatible, this usage makes sense for me. Which code

Re: [OSM-talk] Is it technically and legally possible to add the Open Location Code to the OSM search?

W dniu 13.08.2018 o 18:37, Jo pisze: > I also don't see a reason to add the OLC codes in tags in the > database, even if marked on a building. Since buildings are not guaranteed to fit into OLC rectangles and they not 1:1 compatible, this usage makes sense for me. -- "My method is uncertain/

Re: [OSM-talk] Is it technically and legally possible to add the Open Location Code to the OSM search?

I would think that if you are in the field, apps like OsmAnd and Maps.ME can show you the OLC address of where you are. If you want to see a grid in JOSM or iD, it should be trivial to either show them as transparent imagery, or in the case of JOSM, have a plugin draw the grid and show it as an

Re: [Talk-us] State Open Data

On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 4:28 PM Kevin Kenny wrote: > > TL:DR: The closest answer to Clifford Snow's original question for New > > York is http://gis.ny.gov/gisdata/inventories/details.cfm?DSID=932 > > which is virtually certain (the law, as always is muddy) to be > > ODBL-compatible (and in fact,

Re: [OSM-talk] Is it technically and legally possible to add the Open Location Code to the OSM search?

Hi Tom, This is an example of the first way I and I think others in the humanitarian world need to use OLCs to evaluate them for what they can or can not solve for humanitarian and other use cases: https://twitter.com/BlakeGirardot/status/1028689726088388609 We need to deal with them at scale,

Re: [OSM-talk] Is it technically and legally possible to add the Open Location Code to the OSM search?

Perhaps let me add my 2c: In my mental model there are two cases in which plus codes attain different semantics: a plus code as an encoding of latitude and longitude, and a plus code written on an sign above a door or on a house. If you asked me I'd say the first should not be ingested into a

Re: [OSM-talk] Is it technically and legally possible to add the Open Location Code to the OSM search?

I'm surprised to see that this conversation has made it past the weekend. Since it has, let me add my voice to those suggesting that encoding OLC in the database (or any other values that can be algorithmically derived from geometry) makes very little sense. I'm grateful to everyone who has

Re: [talk-au] City of Gold Coast / repeat requests of CC BY waivers

There's a number of people here in Australia who are keen to use our governments data to improve OSM and I'm sure there's been a lot of double ups in requests. I'd encourage everyone who's identifying data sources and asking for permissions or waivers to contribute to

Re: [Talk-se] Bulk Download of precise tiles

Salut Lonni, Je n'ai pas la réponse à ta question mais je souhaitais simplement te souhaiter la bienvenue en Suède (avec un peu de retard). Je suis à Stockholm, n'hésite pas à demander si tu passes visiter et que tu cherches un hébergement, j'habite dans une grosse coloc et on a de la place.

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] projet du mois : limite de vitesse 80/90 ?

Bonjour, Personnellement, je n'ajoute plus désormais le FR:rural car il n'a plus de sens parce qu'il est applicable en urbain. FR:implicite me semblerait préférable. Par ailleurs, il faut vérifier la date de la modification quand on a maxspeed=90 pour ne pas enlever une correction faite après

[Talk-se] Bulk Download of precise tiles

Hello everyone. I am new to the mailing list and decided to contact you after the suggesting was made by people from OSM. Here is the reason why I am contacting you today. I would love to render a visualization of some data on Stockholm that needs to be put on a map with precize positioning.

Re: [Talk-GB] Royal Mail trialling 'parcel' post boxes

Yeah sorry, Royal Mail don't like anyone knowing where post boxes are ;) On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 14:01 Philip Barnes wrote: > Interesting, but cannot see any locations to use as survey hints. Although > I can guess at one or two in Leicester. > > Phil (trigpoint) > > On 13 August 2018 13:48:51

Re: [Talk-GB] Royal Mail trialling 'parcel' post boxes

I wonder if, like South West ambulances with defibrillators, they believe the public knowing their locations is a security risk. DaveF On 13/08/2018 14:00, Philip Barnes wrote: Interesting, but cannot see any locations to use as survey hints. Although I can guess at one or two in

Re: [Talk-de] Wege des WSV an den Kanälen / tagging

On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 06:34:15PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > Mal ketzerisch gefragt, brauchen wir dann service überhaupt noch? Bei > Zufahrten zu anderen technischen Anlagen wie Häfen, Staudämmen, > Brunnen und Transformatoren, etc. könnte man immer sagen, die Wege > dienten der

Re: [Talk-GB] Royal Mail trialling 'parcel' post boxes

Interesting, but cannot see any locations to use as survey hints. Although I can guess at one or two in Leicester. Phil (trigpoint) On 13 August 2018 13:48:51 BST, SK53 wrote: >Press release: https://www.royalmail.com/parcel-postboxes > >Trial locations are in Leicester & Northampton. >

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: 2 Great Lakes missing

On Monday 13 August 2018, SelfishSeahorse wrote: > > Thanks for the tip; I din't think of it. Actually my computer had > more difficulties to calculate that i had to find the errors. :-) Note checking this kind of errors on large multipolygons is not really that difficult. For each of the big

[Talk-GB] Royal Mail trialling 'parcel' post boxes

Press release: https://www.royalmail.com/parcel-postboxes Trial locations are in Leicester & Northampton. Jerry ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-cz] nenalezené spojení

Ahoj, On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:04 AM wrote: > Zkoušel jsem to tedy na stránkách www.openstreetmap.org a tam jsem dopadl > stejně (někdy to spojení vyhledá a někdy ne). > > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car=50.3539%2C14.7865%3B50.1066%2C14.2694 > Mě to funguje v zásadě

Re: [Talk-de] Wege des WSV an den Kanälen / tagging

On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 02:18:23PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > "Als Wirtschaftswege werden in Deutschland Wege wie Feld-, Wald- oder > > *Wasserwirtschaftswege* bezeichnet". Und bitte mach dir die Mühe mal das BGH Urteil zu lesen - Von "Wasser" ist in dem ganzen Urteil keine Rede. Kommt

Re: [Talk-de] Wege des WSV an den Kanälen / tagging

On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 06:34:15PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > sent from a phone > > > On 12. Aug 2018, at 18:12, chris66 wrote: > > > > Ja, das ist meine Meinung. > > > > Es handelt sich um Privatwege die der Bewirtschaftung der Kanäle dienen. > > Fußgänger und Radfahrer sind auf

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] projet du mois : limite de vitesse 80/90 ?

La cause probable est que la route était découpée mais a été refusionnée : les valeurs ont été fusionnées séparées par des point-virgules. Cela signale une anomalie où la fusion n'aurait pas du avoir lieu. Le lun. 13 août 2018 à 13:34, David Crochet a écrit : > Bonjour > > > Le 13/08/2018 à

Re: [Talk-de] Wege des WSV an den Kanälen / tagging

On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 06:15:51PM +0200, chris66 wrote: > Am 09.08.2018 um 09:57 schrieb Christoph Hormann: > > > Bei highway=track ist die land- und forstwirtschaftliche Nutzung > > übrigens keine abschließende Aufzählung von möglichen Nutzungen, im > > Englischen steht da ein 'etc.' dran.

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: 2 Great Lakes missing

Yeah those great "lakes" are such a massive relations... I think I can make toast on my computer while it's calculating the errors. Thanks for fixing it Selfish Seahorse On Mon., Aug. 13, 2018, 9:12 a.m. SelfishSeahorse, < selfishseaho...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 14:01,

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: 2 Great Lakes missing

On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 14:01, Christoph Hormann wrote: > > > Note you can easily check if there are broken multipolygons in the OSM > inspector: > > http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas=-84.14378=46.10509=8 > > If a lake multipolygon is broken the lake outline will be shown as > context

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: 2 Great Lakes missing

Hi! On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 13:50, Tom Hughes wrote: > > You should see the changes at z13+ but z0-12 are only rendered once a > month or when the style changes. Thanks for your explanation. This also explains why it was not noticed that the lakes had disappeared until about a month after the

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: 2 Great Lakes missing

Note you can easily check if there are broken multipolygons in the OSM inspector: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas=-84.14378=46.10509=8 If a lake multipolygon is broken the lake outline will be shown as context there and the location of the error usually in red (self interaection)

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: 2 Great Lakes missing

You should see the changes at z13+ but z0-12 are only rendered once a month or when the style changes. Tom On 13/08/18 12:36, SelfishSeahorse wrote: Apparently I sent the message only to James ... So here it is for the rest of you. eanwhile the lakes are rendered): -- Forwarded

[OSM-talk] Fwd: 2 Great Lakes missing

Apparently I sent the message only to James ... So here it is for the rest of you. eanwhile the lakes are rendered): -- Forwarded message - Hi There were quite a few problems with these multipolygons (overlapping and unclosed ways, no role, inner ways belonging to wrong

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] projet du mois : limite de vitesse 80/90 ?

Bonjour Le 13/08/2018 à 13:23, Julien Lepiller a écrit : donne une vitesse limite de « 30;50 ». C'est 30 ou 50 ? Qu'est-ce que ça veut dire ? Quand tu regardes ce que tu peux voir, mais ce que tu ne peux pas utiliser, c'est qu'il y a un ralentisseur, donc un passage à 30 le chemin

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] projet du mois : limite de vitesse 80/90 ?

Le 2018-08-12 22:53, osm.sanspourr...@spamgourmet.com a écrit : Bonjour, certes on peut continuer encore un moment du côté des postes de distribution mais un sujet sans doute impactant plus les utilisateurs sont les limites de vitesse. Je pense que les maxspeed=90 n'ayant pas

Re: [Talk-de] Datum einer Kontrolle vermerken?

Zwei Ideen zum Thema: 1) delayed notes: Eine note bei der ich ein Datum eingeben, wann sie sichtbar wird. 2) ich benutze das source tag um anzugeben, dass ich Gebäude verschoben habe (oder neu hinzugefügt habe) in der Form: source:position=Esri World Imagery Hintergrund: in meiner Gegend sind

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Bilan du Projet du mois de juillet 2018 : les postes électriques

Hello, On 01/08/2018 02:34, François Lacombe wrote: Si on regarde de plus près le mois de Juillet, 3557 objets ont été édits, parmi lesquels : 307 postes poteaux 2975 postes en bâtiment 233 postes en armoire 42 postes de transport Je suis allée faire un tour dans la campagne pour en

Re: [Talk-cz] geograficke regiony v CR

On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 12:40, Marián Kyral wrote: > > Hmm: http://zemepis.zszlutice.cz/kabinety/zemepis/Cr-hory/hory.htm > > Jsem si jistý, že tohle jsem se ve škole neučili. Ale je pravda, že já > ještě končil v osmičce. > Taky jsem koukala, protože to Plzeňsko shodou okolností byl referát

Re: [Talk-cz] geograficke regiony v CR

-- Původní e-mail -- Od: majka Komu: talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Datum: 13. 8. 2018 12:34:43 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] geograficke regiony v CR " On Sun, 12 Aug 2018 at 22:57, Jan Macura mailto:macura...@gmail.com)> wrote: " Tak to jste troufalci. Kolikrát už jste to zkoušeli?

Re: [Talk-cz] geograficke regiony v CR

On Sun, 12 Aug 2018 at 22:57, Jan Macura wrote: > Tak to jste troufalci. Kolikrát už jste to zkoušeli? Přijet třeba do > Žinkov a ptát se domorodců "japa se menuje tůta vaše geomorfologická > oblast?" Kolik odpovědí bylo "Nu to je přeci Plzeňská pahorkatina, > panáčku!"? > Troufám si tvrdit, že

Re: [Talk-cz] geograficke regiony v CR

ahoj, mohu se mylit, ale proc je dulezite to "on the ground"? Je spousta polozek, ktere se nedaji pouhou navstevou mista zjistit, je nutne dalsi zjistovani a patrani. Treba odlisne jazykove ci historicke nazvy sidel, mistni nazvy (treba i mene vyznamnych ci vyraznych bodu, nez jsou vrcholy)...

Re: [Talk-cz] Jak zmapovat návštěvnické centrum?

V Nošovicích jsem dal na budovu tourism=attraction a přidal extra POI pro obchod se suvenýry. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303680306 (Koukám, že tam mám typo :-O ) Marián -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Mikoláš Štrajt Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 13. 8.

Re: [Talk-cz] Jak zmapovat návštěvnické centrum?

Např. jaderná elektrárna temelín má návštěvnické (nebo spíš informační) centrum s office=information a tourism=information. Viz https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1779042942 -- Severák -- Původní e-mail -- Od: majka Komu: talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Datum: 13. 8. 2018 10:15:44

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] projet du mois : limite de vitesse 80/90 ?

Bonjour, Sauf que pour les 80 ou 90 ou 110 en soit il n'y a pas l'obligation d'avoir un panneau. Le code de la route dit 130 km/h sur les autoroutes ; 110 km/h sur les routes à deux chaussées séparées par un terre-plein central ; 90 km/h sur les autres routes. et maintenant on décompose le 90 90

[Talk-cz] Jak zmapovat návštěvnické centrum?

Nějaké nápady, jak zmapovat návštěvnické centrum? Konkrétně pivovaru, kde se pořádají prohlídky? Jen jako tourism=attraction? Momentálně tam někdo hodil muzeum, což opravdu odpovídá jen velmi vzdáleně. Díky, Majka ___ Talk-cz mailing list

Re: [talk-au] City of Gold Coast / repeat requests of CC BY waivers

Hi Graeme Am 13.08.2018 um 09:24 schrieb Graeme Fitzpatrick: > ... > > Don't know if anybody else on the Gold Coast may have asked for > permission, or if they're taking my 2 - 3 contacts as multiple > requests, rather than following up the original? > ... Could naturally be, they didn't give me

[Talk-cz] WeeklyOSM CZ 419

Ahoj, je dostupné vydání 419 týdeníku WeeklyOSM: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/cz/archives/10557 * Web pro cyklovýlety. * Fotky na freemap.sk. * Výherci cen OSM 2018. * Postřehy z Milána. * Tagování výstavišť. * Oblasti zájmu (AOI). * Odhad kompletnosti OSM. * Vektorové dlaždice pro osm.org? *

Re: [Talk-de] Datum einer Kontrolle vermerken?

Ich bin nicht der Meinung, dass so etwas gar nichts mit Geodaten zu tun hat, auch wenn nicht direkt. Dann müssten Daten wie Zeitpunkt der Eintragung Änderungsdaten usw auch verschwinden, denn sie haben direkt genausowenig damit zu tun wie die Speicherung der Changesets und Quellen. All diese

Re: [talk-au] City of Gold Coast / repeat requests of CC BY waivers

Hi Simon I may be the guilty party, but I'm not sure? Did contact GCCC earlier this year for permission to use data, which they gave. However, I'd forgotten to ask them for the waiver, so went back to them a couple of days later to ask for that. Lady I spoke to thought it would be OK, but had

Re: [Talk-GB] New Ghosts Set and Survey Me Auto-Location Feature

> On 7 Aug 2018, at 10:53, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > > Philip Barnes wrote: >> Recently new blue branded co-op shops have started to appear, >> some have changed and at least one has opened in direct >> competition with an existing Mid-counties. > > Midcounties are also adopting the "new"

[talk-au] City of Gold Coast / repeat requests of CC BY waivers

We've (as in the LWG) have received a mail from the City of Gold Coast concerning multiple repeat requests for CC BY waiver (no need to point out that that can be annoying). IMHO the AUS community already documents what is going on rather well

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] audit des panneaux

Fabuleux ;-) Merci pour ce bel exemple. Le dim. 12 août 2018 à 22:49, a écrit : > Le 12/08/2018 à 19:11, Jérôme Seigneuret - jerome.seigneu...@gmail.com a > écrit : > > > Faites un audit des panneaux et marquage de votre commune et vous allez > bien rire jaune. > > Bonne soirée, > Jérôme > > On

Re: [Talk-cz] nenalezené spojení

To neni jen v CR. Maj to rozbity. J. __ > Od: > Komu: > Datum: 13.08.2018 01:53 > Předmět: [Talk-cz] nenalezené spojení > >Ahoj, >mohl bych vás požádat o radu s navigací v mapách? Používám zkompilovaný >osrm-routed a nedaří se mi

[Talk-cz] nenalezené spojení

Ahoj, mohl bych vás požádat o radu s navigací v mapách? Používám zkompilovaný osrm-routed a nedaří se mi nalézt spojení mezi 2 body v ČR.   Zkoušel jsem to tedy na stránkách www.openstreetmap.org a tam jsem dopadl stejně (někdy to spojení vyhledá a někdy ne).