[talk-au] Fwd: A way with no tags

(Resent to group...nev) > I think you should add tags as you think appropriate using satellite imagery > and any gps traces in the area and then add a changeset comment to the person > who originally entered the data, explaining what you have done ask for a > check or further info. The person

Re: [Talk-it] R: man_made=bridge

sent from a phone > Am 31.08.2015 um 15:56 schrieb girarsi_liste : > > Poi, per esempio il tag bridge:structure=*, va sul contorno o sulla > highway? sarebbe più logico metterlo sull'oggetto che rappresenta il ponte stesso (quindi man made bridge) che sul percorso

Re: [Talk-de] OpenStreetMap in deutschen Filmen und Fernsehserien

gute Idee irgendwann hatte ich mal so eine Karte aus dem Fernsehen mit dem verglichen, mit dem was wirklich in OSM ist. Die Karte war damals ganz groß eingebelndet gewesen, so dass man genau herausfinden konnte wo es ist. Die haben sich aber schlauer Weise nicht irgend ein real vorhandenes und in

[OSM-talk-nl] Locaties van EAD's iets voor OSM?

Locaties van EAD's iets voor OSM? https://www.aed4.eu/ en de database woont volgens mij bij https://www.radboudumc.nl ___ Talk-nl mailing list Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nl

Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Locaties van EAD's iets voor OSM?

On 2015-09-02 11:12, Pander OpenTaal wrote: Locaties van EAD's iets voor OSM? https://www.aed4.eu/ en de database woont volgens mij bij https://www.radboudumc.nl AED's dus. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Ddefibrillator Ik zou zeggen van wel. Maarten

[Talk-us] Request revert on Changeset #33669446

This is regarding WA 500 in Vancouver, Washington. This is a surface expressway that will be later upgraded to a motorway, but currently has a mix of surface intersections and ramp style interchanges. It appears there is a small but vocal minority of people who are attempting to start an edit

Re: [Talk-de] OpenStreetMap in deutschen Filmen und Fernsehserien

Hi, Frederik Ramm schrieb: >hab mal eine Sammlung von Notizen hier angefangen: > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_in_deutschen_Filmen_und_Fernsehserien spricht was dagegen, das in "OpenStreetMap in deutschen TV Produktionen" oder ähnliches umzubenennen um auch Reportagen,

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] camping / aire naturelle de camping

Bonjour, *Extrait de l'Arrêté :* *5. Interdiction de garage de caravanes et affichage de cette interdiction.* J'ai peut-être mal interprété cela... mais c'est dans le texte Jérôme Le 2 septembre 2015 01:01, Nicolas Dumoulin < nicolas_openstreetmap@dumoulin63.net> a écrit : > Bonsoir, > >

[Talk-de] Öffentliche Dokumentation Was: Problem mit Bahnhofsmapping von MentzDV

Hola, On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:27:28AM +0200, Roland Olbricht wrote: > Ich denke, dass es darauf hinausläuft, generell keine Daten > systematisch ohne weitere Kontrolle aus schematischen Plänen zu > übernehmen. Das betrifft hier nur die Bushaltestellen, und die hat > Lars mittlerweile gelöscht,

[Talk-at] Ironman

Hallo, Am Sonntag fand die Weltmeisterschaft des Ironmans 70.3 in Zell am See statt. Es gibt für den Radkurs eine Karte über den Streckenverlauf wo OpenStreetMap als Hintergrundkarte verwendet wurde. Jedoch finde ich keinen Copyright vermerk. Wer will sich mit denen in Verbindung setzen?

Re: [Talk-de] Problem mit Bahnhofsmapping von MentzDV

Hallo zusammen, > Ja. Ein Revert wäre sicherlich übertrieben. Mein eigentlicher Punkt ist > und bleibt aber, dass ich bei bezahlten Mappern (auch wenn "nur" Hiwis) > doch etwas höhere Ansprüche anlegen will, da man bei beruflichem > Mapping einfach auch schneller mehr kaputt machen kann. Imho

Re: [talk-au] A way with no tags

On 02/09/15 13:55, Nev Wedding wrote: I think you should add tags as you think appropriate using satellite imagery and any gps traces in the area and then add a changeset comment to the person who originally entered the data, explaining what you have done ask for a check or further info. The

Re: [Talk-de] OpenStreetMap in deutschen Filmen und Fernsehserien

Forumbeitrag gefunden: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=27232 Am 2. September 2015 um 09:21 schrieb Christian Pietzsch < christian.pietz...@gmail.com>: > gute Idee > irgendwann hatte ich mal so eine Karte aus dem Fernsehen mit dem > verglichen, mit dem was wirklich in OSM ist. Die

Re: [Talk-cz] jizdni rady

-- Původní zpráva -- Od: Marián Kyral Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 2. 9. 2015 8:07:57 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] jizdni rady " -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Pavel Machek Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech

Re: [Talk-cz] jizdni rady

-- Původní zpráva -- Od: Pavel Machek Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 1. 9. 2015 23:12:50 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] jizdni rady "Ahoj! > > Tzn, ta data neodpovidaji specifikaci, specifikaci jsem si dovolil > > upiratit zde > >

Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Locaties van EAD's iets voor OSM?

+1 Van: Gertjan Idema [mailto:g.id...@zonnet.nl] Verzonden: woensdag 2 september 2015 11:54 Aan: OpenStreetMap NL discussion list Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Locaties van EAD's iets voor OSM? Ik zou dit alleen doen in nauwe samenwerking met aed4.eu, als zij hier meerwaarde in zien.

Re: [Talk-at] Grenzimport Wien

2015-08-21 12:02 GMT-04:00 Frederik Ramm : > Das ist in dieser Allgemeinheit leider nicht richtig. CC-BY gibt dem > Lizenzgeber weitreichende Freiheit, wie er die ihm zustehende > Namensnennung einfordert. Er *könnte* beispielsweise fordern, dass auf > jeder Karte, die mit

[Talk-br] Linhas de transporte público sem paradas definidas

Algumas cidades têm linhas de transporte público que utilizam micro-ônibus, cujo embarque/desembarque pode ocorrer em qualquer ponto de sua rota. Ou seja, não têm pontos de embarque e desembarque definidos ao longo da rota, exceto, obviamente, os pontos inicial e final da linha. Exemplos:

Re: [Talk-us] TIGER tracing layer updated to 2015 release

Yay! The eye of the TIGER! Thanks Eric! On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 8:55 PM Nick Hocking wrote: > Yes, many thanks Eric, > > This facility will result in significant improvements to the US OSM data. > > Cheers > > > Nick > ___ >

Re: [Talk-us] Request revert on Changeset #33669446

I'm kind of seeing that as abuse of classification and classification creep as well. I'd probably have gone with trunk for the entire length of KS 7 from KS 32 to KS 10 rather than spin the wheel and creep it upwards. I'm not really seeing a significant difference in characteristic in the WA 500

Re: [Talk-de] Problem mit Bahnhofsmapping von MentzDV

Hallo, Am 2015-09-02 um 09:27 schrieb Roland Olbricht: > Einen ähnlichen Effekt hat die Wochenaufgabe, ganz ohne bezahlte > Mapper. Auch da ist es ja gewollt, dass ein bestimmtes Phänomen > möglichst flächendeckend auf eine einheitliche Weise erfasst wird - > und dann anschließend die

Re: [Talk-us] Request revert on Changeset #33669446

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:37 AM Paul Johnson wrote: > This is regarding WA 500 in Vancouver, Washington. This is a surface > expressway that will be later upgraded to a motorway, but currently has a > mix of surface intersections and ramp style interchanges. It appears

Re: [Talk-us] Request revert on Changeset #33669446

Revert request opposed. At best, there needs to be additional discussion within talk-us regarding this before DWG takes any action. I am not one of the participants that have edited WA 500 recently; however, those that have have brought this up on the AARoads forum. It is the opinion of the AA

Re: [talk-au] Distinguishing between low-friction and high-friction shared paths

On 3/09/2015 1:35 PM, Chris wrote: Hello, I am new to this group and have a question about pedestrian and bicycle shared paths. I can't find anything in the archives. In NSW, shared paths fall into two broad categories: (1) Sidewalk footpaths that have been designated as shared paths. In

Re: [talk-au] Distinguishing between low-friction and high-friction shared paths

I agree with what Warin said, but perhaps footway=sidewalk http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk could be added as a tag for case (1), since these are basically sidewalks which have been repurposed as shared sidewalk/cycleway? On 3 September 2015 at 13:35, Chris

[talk-au] Distinguishing between low-friction and high-friction shared paths

Hello, I am new to this group and have a question about pedestrian and bicycle shared paths. I can't find anything in the archives. In NSW, shared paths fall into two broad categories: (1) Sidewalk footpaths that have been designated as shared paths. In urban areas these often have poor

[OSM-talk-fr] Rencontre mensuelle OSM-Lyon 08/09/2015 18h30 - Invitation + OdJ

Bonsoir à tous Les mappeurs OSM de Lyon se rencontrent régulièrement le 2ème mardi de chaqu mois, et chacun peut s'inviter et participer à ces rencontres. La prochaine aura lieu : le MARDI 08 SEPTEMBRE à partir de 18h30 au bistrot "CHEZ THIBAULT, 80 rue Montesquieu, 69007 LYON" Accès : M°

Re: [Talk-us] Request revert on Changeset #33669446

On 9/2/15 12:25 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > I'm kind of seeing that as abuse of classification and classification > creep as well. I'd probably have gone with trunk for the entire > length of KS 7 from KS 32 to KS 10 rather than spin the wheel and > creep it upwards. I'm not really seeing a

Re: [Talk-us] Request revert on Changeset #33669446

[Removing DWG from this reply] As Richard W indicated, and I agree, alternating sections of fully controlled and partially controlled access is a grey area, and thus is a judgment call. Both the WA 500 and K-7 examples are judgment calls made by people who have observation and knowledge of

[Talk-cz] Střídavý provoz ve zúžení

Ahoj, nesetkal se někdo s tagem pro střídavý provoz na silnici - tedy v jednu chvíli jezdí auta jen z jedné strany? U nás se používá zejména při rekonstrukcích, ale vyskytuje se i na stálo [1]. Na OSM Wiki jsem to nebyl schopný dohledat. Vojta [1]:

Re: [Talk-cz] Střídavý provoz ve zúžení

Zdar, nejspíš jedině oneway=reversible . Viz http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Vojta Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 2. 9. 2015 21:03:13 Předmět: [Talk-cz] Střídavý provoz ve zúžení

Re: [Talk-de] Problem mit Bahnhofsmapping von MentzDV

Hallo Roland, danke für deine Reaktion. Ich finde allerdings, du machst es dir da zu leicht. Mit Weiterpflegen (aka Hinterherputzen) am Passauer Bahnhof ist das Grundproblem nicht gelöst. Viele Fehler bei eurem Mapping sind systematisch, und treten eben nicht nur in Passau auf. Zumindest die

Re: [Talk-cz] jizdni rady: uzitecny parser

Dne 2.9.2015 v 11:53 Pavel Machek napsal(a): > Ahoj! > >> Koukám na to rozbalování, máme to plus mínus stejně. Ale než tahle hala bala >> se mi více líbí rozbalení do struktury >> >> // >> >> >> >> >> To už mám rozvrtáno, večer dokončím a pošlu. Jediný problém na který jsem >> narazil bylo, že

Re: [Talk-us] Request revert on Changeset #33669446

I'm not so familiar with the K7 example, but I am intimately, first-person familiar with the WA 500 situation. The breakdown from what I gather in the changeset comments is the disconnect with how it functions on the ground and a pretty crassly mindless "but the WSDOT says it's a freeway" idea.

Re: [Talk-de] Abgerissene Gebäude

Am Samstag, 29. August 2015, 10:12:01 schrieb Heinz-Jürgen Oertel: > Hallo, > > sollte man ein abgerissenes Gebäude, bisher building=yes, einfach löschen > obwohl es noch im Bing zu sehen ist? > Wie verhindere ich, dass es nicht wieder neu aufgenommen wird? > > Hat jemend eine Idee? >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Carte du réseau ferré : tagger l’importance des lignes

Côté fiche horaire, ça fait penser à feu Riho ou à Havas. Côté "rapidité", comme sur la relation proposée, c'est plus le type de train qui circule (TGV) que l'infrastructure. Si le but c'est de donner une idée subjective de ce que ça va coûter, alors ce qui compte c'est le type de train (IGV

Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Locaties van EAD's iets voor OSM?

Het zou misschien ook beter zijn als laag op openpoimap.nl, dat op gebruikers is gericht in tegenstelling tot osm.org dat op mappers is gericht Op 2 september 2015 19:44 schreef Gert-Jan van der Weijden : > +1 > > > > > > *Van:* Gertjan Idema [mailto:g.id...@zonnet.nl] >

Re: [Talk-us] Request revert on Changeset #33669446

Seems the same situation exists with US 52 in south east Minnesota. I often do edits in this region and so often see US 52 and have edited it in the past myself. Some months ago I noticed that someone had changed all of the Trunk segments to Motorway. I didn't respond to this at the time. I

Re: [Talk-us] Request revert on Changeset #33669446

I can't speak to this specific instance, but based on Paul's usual criteria, I'd take what he has to say on the topic with a grain of salt. I gave up trying to convince him OK11 between I-244 and US-75 in Tulsa should be tagged as a motorway a long time ago, even though it has zero at grade

Re: [Talk-us] Request revert on Changeset #33669446

It is my understanding that when you see a CalTrans “Begin Freeway” sign it is indicating the section ahead is free of cross traffic (no intersections without grade separation and on/off ramps). That is, freeway implies limited access. And when you see a “End Freeway” sign there will be

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] osmose : boîtes aux lettres absentes

Bonjour Frédéric, Je me suis certainement mal exprimé . Je parlais de l'absence même de marqueur (pas seulement le fix) dans ce secteur. PY Le 2 septembre 2015 13:04, Frédéric Rodrigo a écrit : > Cette possibilité a été supprimé pour les boites aux lettres. > > Suite à

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Carte du réseau ferré : tagger l’importance des lignes

Effectivement, en utilisant les critères donnés par Jérôme (et quelques autres informations) on arrive à rendu proche de OpenRailwayMap ce qui n’est finalement pas si étonnant. Mais le but serait de tagger l’importance (pour un passager dans le cas qui nous intéresse, peut-être plus tard on

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

On 02/09/15 11:30, moltonel 3x Combo wrote: > I always understood that land property was out of scope for OSM. Do > you know of any osm data which records property ? So I should remove all the detail on http://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=wr12%207ep#map=17/52.04851/-1.85665 rather than

Re: [Talk-it] Trovar nodi duplicati

Grazie a tutti: ho risolto anche con overpass turbo (avevo la query già pronta): estratto i 1392 civici, convalidato e corretto con josm, caricato le modifiche. Una ripassata con overpass che mi ha confermato 1382 -- cascafico.altervista.org twitter.com/cascafico Il 02/set/2015 12:53 "Max1234Ita"

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 12:36:26 +0100 Lester Caine wrote: > On 02/09/15 11:30, moltonel 3x Combo wrote: > > I always understood that land property was out of scope for OSM. Do > > you know of any osm data which records property ? > > So I should remove all the detail on >

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

On 02/09/2015, Lester Caine wrote: > On 02/09/15 11:30, moltonel 3x Combo wrote: >> I always understood that land property was out of scope for OSM. Do >> you know of any osm data which records property ? > > So I should remove all the detail on >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Carte du réseau ferré : tagger l’importance des lignes

Bonjour, Je suppose que c'est pour remplacer la carte actuelle des fiches horaires ? http://horaires.capitainetrain.com/gare/geneve-cornavin En comparant rapidement avec OpenRailwayMap

Re: [Talk-it] highway=steps

ho in certi casi aggiunto un flat_steps=yes dove le alzate erano basse e le pedate lunghe (talvolta ho visto delle macchine percorrere scale del genere, dentro dei paesi). ciao Martin ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

On 02/09/15 14:25, Paul Johnson wrote: > But in most (all?) of the US, land ownership (and vehicle ownership, for > that matter) records are open and subject to public inspection, and why > land transfers are typically published conspicuously in the regional > news periodical of record. And in

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

On Wed Sep 2 14:25:52 2015 GMT+0100, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:23 AM, wrote: > > > We can map barriers and visible dividing marks, but land ownership has > > massive privacy and data protection issues. > > > Depends on the region. I've even heard it

Re: [Talk-at] Vor-Ort-MapperInnen für Wien (1. Bezirk) gesucht

Liebe Community, unser Mapping der Wiener Innenstadt im Bezug auf Fußgängerrouting ist seit einiger Zeit abgeschlossen, danke an Rudolf Haupt für die gute Zusammenarbeit! Die Edits sind mit folgendem Account nachvollziehbar: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/perron_rh Auf diesem

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:23 AM, wrote: > We can map barriers and visible dividing marks, but land ownership has > massive privacy and data protection issues. Depends on the region. I've even heard it from county officials (incorrectly!) citing this regarding trying to

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

On Wed Sep 2 14:39:00 2015 GMT+0100, Lester Caine wrote: > On 02/09/15 14:25, Paul Johnson wrote: > > But in most (all?) of the US, land ownership (and vehicle ownership, for > > that matter) records are open and subject to public inspection, and why > > land transfers are typically published

Re: [Talk-cat] SotM CAT 2015

Donat que OSM a Catalunya no és gaire més gran que el grup en sí, jo els enllaçaria. Salut i OSMCat yopaseopor 2015-09-02 11:32 GMT+02:00 Carlos Sánchez : > No està afegit perquè les trobades s'han fet a través de talk-cat. Per > això es troba a ProjectCatalan. Es una manera

Re: [Talk-cat] SotM CAT 2015

No està afegit perquè les trobades s'han fet a través de talk-cat. Per això es troba a ProjectCatalan. Es una manera de no tancar o limitar a Catalunya el grup. Si voleu es pot fet un enllaç a Catalunya que redirigeixi a ProjectCatalan, a la trobada. Den 2 sep 2015 09:07 skrev "Fermí Tanyà"

Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Locaties van EAD's iets voor OSM?

Ik zou dit alleen doen in nauwe samenwerking met aed4.eu, als zij hier meerwaarde in zien. Voor AED's is toegankelijkheid cruciaal. Iedere AED in openstreetmap zou daarom voorzien moeten zijn van openingstijden. Maar wij kunnen niet garanderen dat die data onderhouden wordt. En zelfs al wordt de

Re: [Talk-cz] jizdni rady: uzitecny parser

Ahoj! > Koukám na to rozbalování, máme to plus mínus stejně. Ale než tahle hala bala > se mi více líbí rozbalení do struktury > > // > > > > > To už mám rozvrtáno, večer dokončím a pošlu. Jediný problém na který jsem > narazil bylo, že někteří dopravci mají ve svém jméně čárku, takže cut -d

Re: [Talk-cz] Kam dávat rozcestníky

Ahoj! > > > Standardní a správný způsob je imho (1). Vidíte někdo nějakou > > > výhodu (2)? Protože já to považuju za úplný nesmysl - zatím > > > jsem ale úpravy z (1) na (2) nerevertoval. > > > > To je filozoficka otazka. Protoze to, oc tu bezi, je rozcesti. Tedy > > ta krizovatka cest.

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

On 02/09/2015 01:22, Russ Nelson wrote: Bryce Nesbitt writes: > I've worked on "rails to trails" projects where the physical trace > of the railbed was subsumed by fences, lines of trees and (in once > case) a swimming pool. I'll bet you're talking about the Wallkill Valley Trail north of

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

I see two separate issues getting mixed up: firstly, what types of data "belong" in OSM as a matter of principle, and secondly what quality criteria would apply. Clearly for the second point the data needs to be suitably licensed (if it is externally sourced) and it needs to be verifiable so

Re: [Talk-cz] Kam dávat rozcestníky

Dne 2.9.2015 v 12:01 Pavel Machek napsal(a): > No... Rozcestnik je znacka, ktera mi rika, jak se jmenuje _to > rozcesti_. A kdyz dam rozcestnik mimo, tak sice vim, jak se rozcesti > jmenuje, ale uz ne, ktere to je... Co je to rozcesti? Musel jsem se podivat na

[OSM-talk-fr] osmose : boîtes aux lettres absentes

Bonjour, J'ai constaté l'absence de proposition d'intégration des boîtes aux lettres dans le secteur de Verdun (55) http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#zoom=15=49.15862=5.38574=Mapnik=FFFT=7051%2C8023=1%2C2%2C3 Pourtant, les boîtes aux lettres sont bien présentes dans le *.csv

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] camping / aire naturelle de camping

Le mercredi 2 septembre 2015 10:35:51 Jérôme Seigneuret a écrit : > Bonjour, > *Extrait de l'Arrêté :* > *5. Interdiction de garage de caravanes et affichage de cette interdiction.* > > J'ai peut-être mal interprété cela... mais c'est dans le texte Oui, ça doit être interdiction de "garage

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

On Wed, 02 Sep 2015 11:57:19 +0200 Colin Smale wrote: > Are you suggesting that parcel boundaries have no place in OSM, or > that only verifiable sources should be used? Suppose there was a > suitably licensed source of such boundaries, with authoritative > provenance.

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

On 02/09/2015, Colin Smale wrote: > Are you suggesting that parcel boundaries have no place in OSM, or that > only verifiable sources should be used? Suppose there was a suitably > licensed source of such boundaries, with authoritative provenance. Would > you be against

[Talk-it-trentino] M'appare il Lagorai Cima d'Asta - proposta di mapping party a Vignola Falesina

In collaborazione con l'Associazione culturale Filò di Vignola Falesina (http://www.filovignola.it/) si voleva organizzare un Mapping party dedicato alla mappatura in OSM di alcuni itinerari recentemente pubblicizzati:

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Carte du réseau ferré : tagger l’importance des lignes

C'est normal pour le TGV ça emprunte de la ligne classique comme de la LGV Certaines ligne sont conçu pour du passage de TGV les autres sont pour tout type de transport train (dont train de banlieu). L'importante du réseau est autre. *Maxspeed*? Non c'est pas un élément valable pour définir

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

Hi, On 09/02/2015 02:22 AM, Russ Nelson wrote: > I think Bryce's observation lays this issue to rest. No, you should > not delete railways you cannot see, because they might still exist in > the property lines, Mapping property lines in OSM isn't something I think makes sense. There are reasons

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

Are you suggesting that parcel boundaries have no place in OSM, or that only verifiable sources should be used? Suppose there was a suitably licensed source of such boundaries, with authoritative provenance. Would you be against this being in OSM on principle? Or is it only your supposition

[OSM-talk-fr] Carte du réseau ferré : tagger l’importance des lignes

Bonjour, Je travaille chez Capitaine Train et on aimerait bien avoir une carte du réseau ferré européen. Il y a bien le style transport de Thunderforest ( http://www.thunderforest.com/transport/) mais les transports urbains sont trop présents, et il n’y a pas de hierarchie des lignes. Il

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

On 02/09/2015, Russ Nelson wrote: > Too bad for that guy that he didn't check OpenStreetMap first, because > there was an abandoned railroad mapped in his back yard. Lots of former railway land is now privately owned, sometimes even before the rails get removed. So the fact

Re: [Talk-it] Trovar nodi duplicati

Come diceva Damjan, usi JOSM. Puoi far girare il validatore con l'apposito pulsante, oppure tentare un upload del changeset (il che avvierà il validatore in modo automatico). Quando hai trovato i duplicati, fossero anche 1, ti basta cliccare su Fix: JOSM eliminerà i nodi ridondanti senza che

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] osmose : boîtes aux lettres absentes

Cette possibilité a été supprimé pour les boites aux lettres. Suite à de nombreuses remontées (remontrances) sur la qualité discutable du positionnement d'objets non visibles sur de l'orthophoto et du fait que ce soit "trop" facilement intégrable dans OSM par un simple clic pour des

Re: [Talk-it] highway=steps

Martin, però il tag flat_steps lo usi solo tu, non è documentato sul wiki e non è stato discusso da nessuna parte. Quindi, secondo me, non è il massimo usarlo. Inoltre non capisco quale informazione aggiuntiva può portare rispetto ad highway=steps. Ciao, Andrea 2015-09-02 12:42 GMT+02:00

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

On 02/09/15 12:56, moltonel 3x Combo wrote: >> So I should remove all the detail on >> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=wr12%207ep#map=17/52.04851/-1.85665 >> > rather than adding the missing detail to the right? > Sorry, I see residential areas, hedges, postcodes, etc, overall a well

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

On Wed Sep 2 13:15:42 2015 GMT+0100, moltonel 3x Combo wrote: > On 02/09/2015, Colin Smale wrote: > > I see two separate issues getting mixed up: firstly, what types of data > > "belong" in OSM as a matter of principle, and secondly what quality > > criteria would apply.

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

On 02/09/15 13:23, p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote: >> The principle of "what data belongs in OSM" is about the propeties of >> > that data, not what kind of data it is. But as it happens, a given >> > kind of data usually has the same properties, so "this kind of data >> > doesn't belong in OSM" is a

Re: [Talk-de] OpenStreetMap in deutschen Filmen und Fernsehserien

Hi, On 09/02/2015 09:51 AM, Peter Barth wrote: > spricht was dagegen, das in "OpenStreetMap in deutschen TV Produktionen" > oder ähnliches umzubenennen um auch Reportagen, Dokus,.. mit zu > erfassen? Da gibt es nämlich durchaus auch schnell mal einen Grund, OSM- > Karten bzw Daten zu verwenden.

Re: [Talk-de] Doppenhaushälften mappen

sent from a phone > Am 01.09.2015 um 16:57 schrieb Harald Hartmann > : > > es ist physisch meist nur "ein" Gebäude "meist" bestimmt nicht, in Einzelfällen aber vielleicht schon. Gruß Martin ___ Talk-de mailing list

Re: [Talk-de] Doppenhaushälften mappen

sent from a phone > Am 01.09.2015 um 22:51 schrieb Garry : > > Ich würde aber als Ziel sehen solche Gebäudeteile immer separat zu erfassen - > hilfreich z.B. für den Immobilienmarkt (fast jeder kommt mal in > die Verlegenheit eine Immobilie suchen zu müssen). wenn es

Re: [Talk-de] Doppenhaushälften mappen

sent from a phone > Am 01.09.2015 um 22:51 schrieb Garry : > > Ein Baugutachter in BW hat es mir gegenüber als Bausünde früherer Jahre > dargestellt wenn > die "zwei" Gebäude nicht schalltechnisch vollständig entkoppelt wären, was > heute Vorschrift wäre. entscheidender ist

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

On 02/09/2015, Lester Caine wrote: > On 02/09/15 12:56, moltonel 3x Combo wrote: >> Sorry, I see residential areas, hedges, postcodes, etc, overall a well >> maped area with usefull detail, but nothing mapping land property ? I >> never suggested that this kind of data was out

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

Sometimes land ownership is a matter of public record, it seems. Zoom in and click on a plot: http://gis.stlouiscountymn.gov/planningflexviewers/County_Explorer/ Sure there are privacy considerations, but they are not the same in all jurisdictions. And the face that some jurisdictions would

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

On 02/09/2015, p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote: > We can map barriers and visible dividing marks, but land ownership has > massive privacy and data protection issues. In many countries, the geometry of land parcels is public data. Not "this bit of land is owned by Phil

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

On 02/09/15 13:43, moltonel 3x Combo wrote: >> Ideally I would like to add the NLPG reference >> > to each but currently that is blocked by possible licensing problems. It >> > WOULD be nice to complete the 'hidden' data > Assuming the license issue gets resolved, how will you import it, >

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

On 02/09/2015, Colin Smale wrote: > I see two separate issues getting mixed up: firstly, what types of data > "belong" in OSM as a matter of principle, and secondly what quality > criteria would apply. Clearly for the second point the data needs to be > suitably licensed

Re: [Talk-de] Doppenhaushälften mappen

sent from a phone > Am 01.09.2015 um 16:38 schrieb Keine Werbung : > > Die Siedlung besteht aus Doppenhäusern, also EIN Gebäude (bereits gemapt) mit > ZWEI Hausnummern. üblicherweise sind das 2 Gebäude (EFH), die aneinander gebaut sind (spart Bauland wg. Abstandsflächen

Re: [Talk-de] Doppenhaushälften mappen

sent from a phone > Am 01.09.2015 um 18:13 schrieb Florian Lohoff : > > Wenn im Liegenschaftskataster 2 Gebäudeteile vorhanden sind übernehme > ich die genau so. Dann kriegt jeder Gebäudeteil auf dem outline seine > Adresse. Wenn das nicht der fall ist d.h. auch laut ALKIS ist das

Re: [Talk-de] Doppenhaushälften mappen

sent from a phone > Am 01.09.2015 um 18:44 schrieb Harald Hartmann > : > > Echt, willst du das wirklich? Wenn ja, dann sicherlich nicht fürs > "Routing" - dazu haben wir nämlich im Forum schon genug Threads und > "Beweise" gesammelt, dass bzw. warum es besser

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Russ Nelson wrote: > Too bad for that guy that he didn't check OpenStreetMap first, because > there was an abandoned railroad mapped in his back yard. Now that the > trail has been built, he has a fence about 5' behind his house. I > can't

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 08:08:45 -0500 Paul Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Russ Nelson wrote: > > > Too bad for that guy that he didn't check OpenStreetMap first, > > because there was an abandoned railroad mapped in his back yard. > > Now