Ich bitte doch um etwas mehr Sachlichkeit. Ich distanziere mich ausdrücklich
vor der Aussage des Users grubernd. Jeglich Art von Gewalt, ob es eine
Verharmlosung ist oder der indirekte Aufruf dazu, sind unangebracht und haben
hier keinen Platz!
Von: grubernd
ein komplett revert ist mM nicht zielführend und schwer da die "Fehler" so
verstreut liegen und in etlichen Sessions entstanden sind. Es nervt ist
aber nicht wirklich falsch.
Ich sehe es wie vari...@mailbox.org, der fehlende Wille inkl Verschwörung,
Diffamierung und Drohungen macht das ganze
Liebe Kollegen!
Ich möchte einen Schülerhort richtig eintragen. Wie mache ich das?
Es ist kein Kindergarten, und auch keine Schule.
Ich würde daher zu amenity=social_facility tendieren.
Was meint ihr?
Liebe Grüße,
Christian
___
Talk-at mailing
Es ist alles recht sachlich hier. Er hat nicht zu Gewalt aufgerufen, weder
direkt noch indirekt. Das war einfach ein sarkastisches "früher hätte man". Und
was wir heute machen sollen/sollten, nun, das wird hier diskutiert.
Wenn du bei so einer Aussage probleme hast, solltest du an die Uni in
Ciao Lista, ho ceracato nella wiki ... ma
non trovo nulla in merito a sentiero non percorribile
per grossa ostruzione.
Il mio path chè è correttamento mappato in osm a
si presente con una grosso ostruzione nel mezzo?
Come si segnala?
Grazie
Roberto
On 8/29/2018 12:13 PM, Roberto Brazzelli wrote:
Ciao Lista, ho ceracato nella wiki ... ma
non trovo nulla in merito a sentiero non percorribile
per grossa ostruzione.
Il mio path chè è correttamento mappato in osm a
si presente con una grosso ostruzione nel mezzo?
Come si segnala?
A piedi
... potrebbe anche essere obstacle=landslide (frana), già usato in 4 casi (vedi
[1])
[1] https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=obstacle#values
On 2018-08-29 19:02, Sergio Manzi wrote:
>
> Secondo il wiki [1] "barrier" è un elemento artificiale (costruito
> appositamente per limitare i
Il 29/08/2018 19:12, Sergio Manzi ha scritto:
... potrebbe anche essere obstacle=landslide (frana), già usato in 4 casi (vedi
[1])
[1] https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=obstacle#values
onestamente seguo, ma non ci capisco nulla, perchè manca l'informazione
importante, di che
Ok come proposta cosa vuol dire, si può usare?
Se utilizzo il tags barrier=block il render di openstretmap
non si modifica giusto...ma per quanto riguarda OSMand?
Grazie mille
Il 29/08/2018 16:44, Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto:
sent from a phone
On 29. Aug 2018, at 12:13, Roberto Brazzelli
Secondo il wiki [1] "barrier" è un elemento artificiale (costruito
appositamente per limitare i movimenti) mentre "obstacle" è un elemento che
oggettivamente limita il passaggio e può essere di origine naturale.
Quindi... direi "obstacle", ma come valore della chiave... non è prevista
quella
Per essere ultrapreciso penso che dovresti mettere
obstacle_description:it=Masso di tot metri. Blocca il sentiero, ma è aggirabile
a monte (per fare un esempio)
On 2018-08-29 19:21, liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu wrote:
> Il 29/08/2018 19:12, Sergio Manzi ha scritto:
>> ... potrebbe
Riguardo alle tue considerazioni riguardo la renderizzazione:
anche se sono del tutto nuovo qui mi sembra di capire che uno dei dogmi
principali di OSM sia che con i DATI che inseriamo, tendiamo a costruire un
MODELLO del territorio il più vicino possibile alla realtà.
Sulla base di quel
Federico Cortese wrote
> Attualmente abbiamo Cavasagra
> (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1402465140) e Casacorba
> (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1423423318) mappate come nodi, se
> invece fossero mappate come poligoni sarebbe facile capire a quale
> frazione appartengano le strade.
Da
Thanks for sharing the idea of reporting problems like graffiti using
coordinates. For some reason this idea never crossed my mind until I read
your email. This would have been useful for me on one occasion in
particular when I was trying to describe the location of graffiti in a
public park. I
2018-08-29 19:04 GMT+02:00 EneaSuper :
> Federico Cortese wrote
> > Attualmente abbiamo Cavasagra
> > (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1402465140) e Casacorba
> > (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1423423318) mappate come nodi, se
> > invece fossero mappate come poligoni sarebbe facile
sent from a phone
> On 29. Aug 2018, at 19:21, liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu
> wrote:
>
> onestamente seguo, ma non ci capisco nulla, perchè manca l'informazione
> importante, di che ostacolo/impedimento si tratta?
si, infatti, per dare una risposta concreta dovremmo conoscere meglio
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 8:23 PM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> si potrebbero mappare come entità "place", che non hanno requisiti del tipo
> amministrativo politico. Per il perimetro si potrebbe prendere il confine del
> centro abitato.
>
Era proprio ciò a cui mi riferivo, per quanto non sono
Hallo,
so, wie ich das sehe:
geocodec/.../adresshistory bevorzugt Nodes gegenüber Gebäudetagging. Mit seiner
Arbeitsweise, die er selbst mehrfach erklärt hat, funktioniert das ganze
einfach so, dass er zuerst alles setzt und danach alle Doppeltadressen löscht.
Das zieht natürlich nach sich,
But what is needed to make it work?
Thanks John
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018, 3:59 pm Pine W, wrote:
> Thanks for sharing the idea of reporting problems like graffiti using
> coordinates. For some reason this idea never crossed my mind until I read
> your email. This would have been useful for me on
On 2018-08-29 10:38, vari...@mailbox.org wrote:
Es ist alles recht sachlich hier. Er hat nicht zu Gewalt aufgerufen,
weder direkt noch indirekt. Das war einfach ein sarkastisches "früher
hätte man". Und was wir heute machen sollen/sollten, nun, das wird hier
diskutiert.
Wenn du bei so einer
Besten,
Vanaf 1 sept verandert het OV van Duinkerke. Er zal niet alleen een bus
zijn om de 10' in het centrum, het schema van de stadsbedekking
verandert totaal.
En bovendien, de bus zal IEDERE dag GRATIS zijn. (al sinds een drietal
jaar gratis in het weekend).
Een kans dus voor een
Op 30-08-18 om 00:25 schreef Jo:
Komt er in LEFFRINCKOUCKE FORT DES DUNES een groter busstation?
Ik vond deze pdf over de werken:
http://www.dk-mobilite.fr/download/telechargement/autres-travaux/amenagement-pem-leffrinckoucke.pdf
Er zullen 3 van deze knooppunten zijn (Pole d'échange),
sent from a phone
> On 29. Aug 2018, at 12:13, Roberto Brazzelli wrote:
>
> si presente con una grosso ostruzione nel mezzo?
ci sono vari tags, forse barrier=block ? C’è anche obstacle come proposta:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Obstacle
e forse anche hazard, se ci
Oh, ik had die buslijnen al eens gemapt. Ja, fameuze verandering, geen 2,
2A en 2B meer. 2B ging naar België...
Komt er in LEFFRINCKOUCKE FORT DES DUNES een groter busstation?
Hmm, eens gaan kijken. Ik had alles mooi gemapt met nodes langs de weg.
sind februari 2018 heeft iemand dat compleet
Mobile phones let geolocate pictures. Why not simply send a geolocated
pictures? This would document the graffiti at the same time.
Pierre
Le mercredi 29 août 2018 16 h 57 min 25 s HAE, john whelan
a écrit :
But what is needed to make it work?
Thanks John
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018,
Ciao a tutti,
volevo segnalare ai mappatori veneti non iscritti alla ML Talk-it-Veneto
l'incontro del gruppo Osm-Veneto di ottobre a Padova.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it-veneto/2018-August/75.html
Ciao, grazie
Matteo "Zaffo80" Zaffonato
Il 28/08/2018 20:04, demon.box ha scritto:
ciao, dunque, la query precisa è questa:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/BrH
Ciao demon, se vuoi ho estratto il tuo file e dopo un pò di ravanamenti
ho aggiunto il nome LumeCodice al ref.
Se non hai già fatto te lo mando in formato *.geojson, basta
Am 28.08.2018 um 22:02 schrieb Markus:
ich habe im Landkreis Nürnberger Land (62744)
41 Gemeinden (Grenzpolygone als Relation)
und eine Koordinate.
Möchte mit einem Skript herausfinden,
ob die Koordinate in einem der Polygone liegt?
und wenn ja: in welchem?
Die Grenzpolygone sollen auf dem
-- Original Message --
From: "Mike Evans"
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Cc: "David Groom"
Sent: 28/08/2018 19:22:16
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline and tidal rivers
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 11:09:47 +
"David Groom" wrote:
There is no consensus.
Personally I'm not in favour of
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 at 23:37, Jan Macura wrote:
>
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 at 23:35, majka wrote:
>
>> Zatím mi totiž připadá, že u posledního vylepšení (tedy víc systémů) spíš
>> než k výraznému zpřesnění došlo ke zrychlení fixu.
>>
>
> Zrychlení fixu by měl být logický důsledek většího množství
... oops, forgot to mention the app is Android only, not iOS - and only
supports API 23+ (Marshmallow upwards).
There is now a rough guide, based on yesterday's email, available on the
MapThePaths site. Apologies for the lack of detail on this: I am going away and
have little time at the
Bonjour,
On 28-08-18, Philippe Verdy wrote:
> De nombreux polygones tagués avec des "landuse=*"/"natural=*" persistent
> depuis l'import grossier de Corine Land Use de 2006 (qui ne détaillait pas
> la présence de routes ou surfaces habitées). Rien d'anormal, il y a bien de
> la vigne autour mais
Sveiki
Po paskutinio įrašo apie dirbtinio intelekto galimybes, panašu
susiformavo šiokia tokia klaidinga nuomonė. Galėjo pasirodyti, kad
tuoj paspausime žalią mygtuką „dirbti“ ir visi namukai Lietuvoje patys
nusipaišys. Tai jei trumpai - taip nebus (bent jau kelis ateinančius
metus), o detaliau
Jen info - zoom po 14 komplet, 15 se pomalu od severu plni, ale uz je
to nadlouho. Do konce tydne snad bude komplet i 16, dam pak vedet.
Bye
Dne 28. srpna 2018 10:30 Tom Ka napsal(a):
> osmap.cz jsem doplnil do devel instance k photodb2, preklopim pak asi
> az oboji najednou, mrknout/pouzit lze
I thought that you said c roads would remain in NI but judging by Clive's
reaction I thought something must have changed. He's obviously not
convinced that c roads are going to remain in NI so perhaps you should
make it even more abundantly and explicitly clear that this is the case and
have it
Thanks for your polite request Richard. I stand by my assessment, based not
on your intentions or character but based on the result. Regards Brian
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 at 21:40, Richard Fairhurst
wrote:
> Brian Prangle wrote:
> > I suggest at the very least that the change is reverted for NI.
>
Hi David
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:09:58 +
"David Groom" wrote:
> >>There is no consensus.
> >>
> >>Personally I'm not in favour of the view that any body of water which
> >>is
> >>tidal should be bounded by a way tagged as coastline.
> >>
> >>Reasons for this
> >>
> >>1) Ask any one who
I'm seeking some feedback from the community about the way at
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/157934548 should it exist
in OSM?
https://www.flickr.com/photos/136319147@N08/22832546277/in/datetaken-public/
There isn't really any marked track on the ground, which is a big reason to
Liebe OSM-Community,
ich möchte euch gerne darüber in Kenntnis setzen, dass Wikimedia
Deutschland sich jetzt mit einem neuen Förderangebot an Projekte um
OpenStreetMap richtet, um Mapper und insbesondere auch den Austausch und
gemeinsame Aktivitäten mit Aktiven aus den Wikimedia-Projekten zu
"Route de X à Y" ?
Oui, on trouve ce genre de libellés sur le cadastre, mais ce ne sont de mon
point de vue que des éléments d'habillage et de contexte (un peu comme les
Nord/Sud Est/Ouest sur les lieux-dits).
Pour moi, ce n'est pas à mettre en name=*, car c'est au mieux une
description de
… ce message me remémore un point que j’ai oublié dans mon message initial et
mes excuses pour la digression à venir !
Ce type de nom peut actuellement se retrouver sur les « plaques de cocher »
qu’il reste parfois aux détour de bâtiments, par exemple « Chemin de Grande
communication nº0 de X
Bonjour à tous !
Je ne sais pas si cela a déjà été fait, mais je trouve qu'il serait
souhaitable de dégommer du rouge (je reprends l'expression de Christian)
au niveau des notes OSM des utilisateurs.
Surtout après l'été, de nombreux touristes sont allés aux 4 coins du
pays et y a vraiment de
Je viens de regarder, ça me semble furieusement inexploitable.
1) on n'a que des boudingbox... donc des rectangles, alors que les dates de
mises à jour suivent à peu près les limites de départements
2) le minT / maxT qui indique la plage de date est systématiquement:
maxT="2018-05-29"
Bonsoir à toutes & tous,
Parallèlement à la discussion sur les lieux-dits [1], je pense qu’il y a une
carte à jouer sur le nommage des voies de communication — principalement /hors
agglomération/, en ville les routes étant connues sous le terme de « rue ».
Si les routes ont généralement une
Hi
Hmm.. strange. Note Cycle Map does still render
Check here:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/compare/v4.10.0...v4.13.0
Raise a query here:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues
Cheers
DaveF
On 28/08/2018 18:48, jc...@mail.com wrote:
Has there been a
Hallo Nico,
wäre super, wenn Wikimedia Deutschland sich in diesen Dingen auch ein
bisschen mit dem FOSSGIS (deutsches Local Chapter der OSMF) abstimmen
könnte, so dass der FOSSGIS von solchen Plänen nicht erst aus den
Nachrichten erfährt ;)
Mir stößt ein bisschen negativ auf, dass "Mapillary"
Even in these days of Brexit, I don't think there's any movement for
Northern Ireland to leave GB. You've been misinformed!
Hi Toby,
Northern Ireland is part of the UK but it's not part of GB.
GB is England, Scotland and Wales.
The official title of this country is "The United Kingdom of
On 29/08/18 20:25, Toby Speight wrote:
Thanks for that - it predates my joining this list. It seems to (partially)
answer only my first question - it's to benefit those who don't like their
rendering (on paper/screen or on a navigation device). That's why we have
rendering rules - if you don't
0> In article <6591308.YUxS5xHkjF@solus>,
0> WebMaster@Killyfole org uk mailto:webmas...@killyfole.org.uk> ("Wou")
wrote:
Wou> ... GB doesn't include Northern Ireland, ...
Even in these days of Brexit, I don't think there's any movement for
Northern Ireland to leave GB. You've been
On 29/08/2018 20:25, Toby Speight wrote:
Thanks for that - it predates my joining this list. It seems to (partially)
answer only my first question - it's to benefit those who don't like their
rendering (on paper/screen or on a navigation device). That's why we have
rendering rules - if you
0> In article
,
0> Dan S. mailto:danstowell%2b...@gmail.com> ("Dan") wrote:
Dan> The documentation happened after-the-fact rather than in advance,
Dan> as the AECoC demands.
There's still no documentation on the tag wiki at [1] or [2].
Interestingly, there is a mention of "unsigned_ref" [3]
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 at 09:53, Tom Ka wrote:
> pro JOSM: tms[16]:https://osm.fit.vutbr.cz/strava/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.png
>
> do osmap.cz doplnim jak bude chvile a dam vedet. Dlazdice se zatim
> tahaji ale mensi zoomy uz funguji, takze je mozne vyzkouset.
>
Výborný, dík!
To je heatmapa všech aktivit?
Hi Everyone,
Our Open Maps team (https://github.com/microsoft/open-maps) has been taking a
closer look at OSM in the UK. Some of you may have seen my session in Milan
where we talked about Microsoft’s ongoing OSM work in Australia.
We found a few examples of roads missing names that we
0> In article ,
0> Dave F. mailto:davefoxfa...@btinternet.com> ("Dave") wrote:
Dave> Point about OSM wiki: IMO giving multiple options for the same
Dave> entity leads to confusion & errors so should be avoided.
That's exactly what's problematic about "highways_authority_ref": it
creates a tag
Bonjour,
Je découvre votre discussion sur le tard mais avez-vous pensé à utiliser
l'autoconf du géoportail ?
Il y a les dates, les emprises (des bbox), et les min/max scale
denominator pour chaque sources.
Ça se présente comme ça :
On 29/08/2018 18:59, Christian Quest wrote:
Je viens de regarder, ça me semble furieusement inexploitable.
Ça fait plusieurs années que j'exploite ce fichier en ce qui me concerne ;-)
1) on n'a que des boudingbox... donc des rectangles, alors que les
dates de mises à jour suivent à peu
Frank-3 wrote
> Am 28.08.2018 um 22:02 schrieb Markus:
>> ich habe im Landkreis Nürnberger Land (62744)
>> 41 Gemeinden (Grenzpolygone als Relation)
>> und eine Koordinate.
>>
>> Möchte mit einem Skript herausfinden,
>> ob die Koordinate in einem der Polygone liegt?
>> und wenn ja: in welchem?
>>
Ahoj,
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 09:30, majka wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 at 23:37, Jan Macura wrote:
>
>>
>> Zrychlení fixu by měl být logický důsledek většího množství viditelných
>> satelitů.
>>
>
> Ale tak nějak ne důsledek jediný...
>
Jestli věříš, že důsledkem bude i zpřesnění polohy, tak
Given the level of publicity/invitation of the area I think its fair to have it
on the map. It would be worth adding some warning/risk information if possible
given concern for walkers in the area
https://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/things-to-do/lookouts/figure-eight-pools
Cheers - Phil
+1 to Elliot Plack's proposal to use Simplify to remove the redundant
nodes from the poor quality imported buildings.
In fact, I did this myself for another massive import: User "jumbanho"
imported buildings for the large city of Raleigh, NC back in January
2010.
There were lots of degenerate
On 29/08/18 21:21, Jubal Harpster wrote:
Rosneath Castle Caravan Park
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92291906
_https://goo.gl/maps/5zn1EEXwYER2_
_https://binged.it/2BCrYOr_
OSM has the name on the actual caravan park, which sounds more likely:
On 29/08/18 21:21, Jubal Harpster wrote:
Stadium Mews
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260127900
https://goo.gl/maps/JJNxamCgLy12
_https://binged.it/2C0LAw1_
PAF file ... N5 1FP
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - https://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
On 29/08/2018 20:44, Toby Speight wrote:
0> In article ,
0> Dave F. mailto:davefoxfa...@btinternet.com> ("Dave") wrote:
Dave> Point about OSM wiki: IMO giving multiple options for the same
Dave> entity leads to confusion & errors so should be avoided.
That's exactly what's problematic about
Good point Phil, I've added a description tag and a few of the documented
flood prone tags to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/257707539
On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 at 09:19, Phil Wyatt wrote:
> Given the level of publicity/invitation of the area I think its fair to
> have it on the map. It would be
On 29/08/2018 20:35, Toby Speight wrote:
Wou> ... GB doesn't include Northern Ireland, ...
Even in these days of Brexit, I don't think there's any movement for
Northern Ireland to leave GB. You've been misinformed!
Sorry Toby, but it's you who's been misinformed.
On 29/08/2018 20:32, Toby Speight wrote:
I consider it a "niche" that wants them hidden.
The vast, vast majority are hidden on the ground.
I don't see
that we have to mis-tag them all to have them hidden - I can see it
would be useful to have a map with less clutter, but it shouldn't be
Bonjour Claude,
Effectivement, si les données sont disponibles sous licence CC-BY, il
faudra obtenir une autorisation. Au cas où, je mets un lien vers un article
(en anglais) qui explique pourquoi il faut faire ça et comment le faire:
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/
0> In article
,
0> Andrew Hain mailto:andrewhain...@hotmail.co.uk> ("Andrew") wrote:
Andrew> Toby, I really think you need to read through the conversation
Andrew> archived at
Andrew>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-August/thread.html
Andrew> and answer the points
Buenos dias a todos,
Me llamo Alban Vivert, soy un geografo/cartografo francés.
Les escribo para hablarles de un proyecto que estoy haciendo con el apoyo
de una ONG francesa (http://www.cartong.org/) que se llama *Nomad Maps*.
Se trata de un recorrido de seis meses en bicicleta a través de
0> In article <1535456684095-0.p...@n8.nabble.com>,
0> Richard Fairhurst mailto:rich...@systemed.net> ("Richard") wrote:
Richard> Toby Speight wrote:
>> Who is responsible for coordinating the related changes to software -
>> editors, renderers, converters and QA tools - that are required? I
>>
Toby Speight wrote:
> That's why we have
> rendering rules - if you don't like the rendering, change the rules.
What you're suggesting would imply that every worldwide site using OSM data
to display a consumer-facing map, or provide routing, needs to write a
special exception for Great Britain.
71 matches
Mail list logo
