Re: [talk-au] 1. Proposing a bulk locality edit for new admin_level definitions (Dian ?gesson)

I fully support this bulk edit From: talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org Sent: Monday, May 9, 2022 8:32:00 PM To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 35 Send Talk-au mailing list submissions to talk-au@openstreetmap.org To

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 32

Issue 30 (Luke Stewart) -- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 14:35:55 +1000 From: Luke Stewart To: Anthony Panozzo Cc: "talk-au@openstreetmap.org" Subject: Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 30 Message-ID:

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 30

alk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 28 (Luke Stewart) -- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 11:03:59 +1000 From: Luke Stewart To: Anthony Panozzo Cc: "talk-au@openstreetmap.org" Subject: Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Dige

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 28

Issue 13 (Luke Stewart) -- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 10:40:53 +1000 From: Luke Stewart To: Anthony Panozzo Cc: Dian ?gesson , "talk-au@openstreetmap.org" Subject: Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 13 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 13

That picture is about an intersection not a T-intersection lmao From: Dian Ågesson<mailto:m...@diacritic.xyz> Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2022 9:59 AM To: Anthony Panozzo<mailto:pan...@outlook.com> Cc: Luke Stewart<mailto:suburbansilvervl...@gmail.com>; talk-au@openstreetmap.

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 13

No it is not because the road in front of the POV car in a one way road which is not allowed, it would even need you to drive for a little bit going the wrong way lmao. From: Luke Stewart<mailto:suburbansilvervl...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2022 9:52 AM To: Anthony Panozzo<m

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 21

of Talk-au digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 13 (Luke Stewart) -- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 09:58:28 +1000 From: Luke Stewart To: Anthony Panozzo Cc: Dian ?gesson , &quo

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 13

Yes at the median is fine, but not from where the point of view of that picture is. TheSwavu has allowed u-turns starting from exactly the point of view of that picture and back From: Luke Stewart<mailto:suburbansilvervl...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2022 9:28 AM To: Anthony P

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 13

You are wrong, you can not do u-turns at t-intersections on a one way road From: Dian Ågesson<mailto:m...@diacritic.xyz> Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2022 8:39 AM To: Anthony Panozzo<mailto:pan...@outlook.com> Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org> Subject:

[talk-au] TheSwavu

map.org You can reach the person managing the list at talk-au-ow...@openstreetmap.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Talk-au digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Iss

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 13

o it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Talk-au digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 12 (Anthony Panozzo) -- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 22:44:40 + From: Anthony

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 12

quot;Re: Contents of Talk-au digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: U-turn rules in South Australia (Was Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 6) (Andrew Davidson) 2. TheSwavu (Anthony Panozzo) -- Message: 1 Date: Tu

[talk-au] TheSwavu

Vol 179, Issue 6) (Anthony Panozzo) 4. Re: U-turn rules in South Australia (Was Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 6) (Anthony Panozzo) -- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 22:50:24 +0100 From: Andy Townsend To: tal

Re: [talk-au] U-turn rules in South Australia (Was Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 6)

uesday, May 3, 2022 7:30:50 AM To: Anthony Panozzo Cc: OpenStreetMap Subject: U-turn rules in South Australia (Was Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 6) On Tue, 3 May 2022, 03:02 Anthony Panozzo, mailto:pan...@outlook.com>> wrote: I would like to report theswavu for this e

Re: [talk-au] U-turn rules in South Australia (Was Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 6)

Andrew Davidson<mailto:thesw...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2022 7:31 AM To: Anthony Panozzo<mailto:pan...@outlook.com> Cc: OpenStreetMap<mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org> Subject: U-turn rules in South Australia (Was Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 6) On Tue, 3

[talk-au] user TheSwavu

est..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 7 (Anthony Panozzo) -- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 17:04:51 + From: Anthony Panozzo To: "talk-au@openstreetmap.org" Subject: Re: [talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 7

quot;Re: Contents of Talk-au digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 6 (Anthony Panozzo) -- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 16:58:34 + From: Anthony Panozzo To: "talk-au@openstreetm

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 6

e edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Talk-au digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3 (Anthony Panozzo) 2. Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3

. From: Dean Scott Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 11:03:51 PM To: Anthony Panozzo ; talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3 Hi, what section of road has TheSwavu allowed u-turns? If you are referring to the intersection with traffic

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3

ott...@outlook.com> Sent: Monday, 2 May 2022 11:03 PM To: Anthony Panozzo<mailto:pan...@outlook.com>; talk-au@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3 Hi, what section of road has TheSwavu allowed u-turns? If you are referring to

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 4

1. Re: New OSM Discourse site: community.osm.org (Simon Poole) 2. Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3 (Anthony Panozzo) 3. Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3 (Luke Stewart) -- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 14:36:03

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3

Reporting user TheSwavu | OpenStreetMap 2 hours ago he made this changeset Changeset: 120456255 | OpenStreetMap he has allowed u-turns

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 178, Issue 57

tal like "from" or "to" sometimes it's obvious what needs to be re-added, and sometimes actually deleting it is just fine because other tags (such as oneway) are doing the same job. Where you think a turn restriction has been deleted in error, perhaps it would help to comment why

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 178, Issue 55

o it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Talk-au digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 178, Issue 48 (Luke Stewart) -- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 22:07:00 +1000 From: Luke Stewart To: An

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 178, Issue 48

I didn’t realise you emailed me directly I am going to have to block you from doing so in the future, it’s against OSM au-talk policy From: Luke Stewart<mailto:suburbansilvervl...@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, 30 April 2022 9:21 PM To: Anthony Panozzo<mailto:pan...@outlook.com>; OS

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 178, Issue 48

te: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 15:04:05 +1000 From: Dian ?gesson To: OSM Australian Talk List Subject: Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 178, Issue 46 Message-ID: <06b0964db149a5343954af20fe2e3...@diacritic.xyz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 178, Issue 46

ictions (Was:Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 178, Issue 44) Message-ID: <9d7c85e4-257e-f7b0-bd48-bf425c9c3...@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed On 30/4/22 00:45, Anthony Panozzo wrote: > This account is either a bot account or someone that thinks they kn

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 178, Issue 44

User TheSwavu This account is either a bot account or someone that thinks they know more than they actually do, every single time anybody does a routing correction this account comes along and “fixes” it based on “knowledge” from the notes, let me just say I looked over some of the edit this

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 175, Issue 22

Creating new Bus Stop nodes Is the consensus to remove the plaform tags from new nodes? From: talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 10:30:11 PM To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: Talk-au Digest, Vol 175, Issue 22 Send Talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 175, Issue 15

My User name is Slice0 and I was the one who made the mass edit to Upgrade the Bus Stop nodes to current standards. I did not bring it up for discussion here because it has already been discussed and approved validator could consider a `public_transport=platform` way as routable · Issue #8760

Re: [talk-au] Position magazine: looking for perspectives on G-NAF

ralian OSM community who would be appropriate. The result will be an article or articles about the subject for both Position magazine and Spatial Source. Cheers, Anthony Wallace Editor Position magazine + SpatialSource.com.au<http://www.spatialsource.com.au/> ---

[talk-au] suburb boundaries

Hello all, I would like to ask what the status of the suburb boundaries is? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/ABS_Data user pnorman (on IRC) has offered to import this data if nobody knows how to do it___ Talk-au mailing list

Re: [talk-au] Missing streets in Sydney

On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com wrote: On 30 August 2011 16:41, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote: Surveying suburban streets by GPS these days makes about as much sense as using a horse and cart on a freeway... This tracing vs survey argument is as

Re: [talk-au] Going separate ways

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: You're both a whole continent and an island. There is therefore no reason why data users can't use FOSM for Australia and OSM for the rest of the world - and even combine the two into one dataset. CC-BY-SA doesn't

Re: [talk-au] Going separate ways

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 6:53 AM, James Livingston li...@sunsetutopia.com wrote: On 11/07/2011, at 8:47 PM, John Smith wrote: Then why was there such a big fuss made over Haiti edits should be PD so that the UN could mix the data with other datasets... Because they were mixing the datasets. If

Re: [talk-au] Going separate ways

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: David Groom wrote: Are you sure?  ODbL defines 'Collective Database Means this Database in unmodified form as part of a collection of independent databases ..'. Therefore if you cut out Australia it cant be part

Re: [talk-au] Going separate ways

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: David Groom wrote: Are you sure?  ODbL defines 'Collective Database Means this Database in unmodified form as part of a collection of independent

Re: [talk-au] Going separate ways

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:11 AM, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote: - Original Message - From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 2:00 PM Subject: Re: [talk-au] Going separate ways David Groom wrote: Are you

Re: [talk-au] Going separate ways

Anyway, I think what Richard is trying to say is this: 1) Create osm-without-australia.osm by removing australia from the OSMF database. 2) Create fosm-australia-only.osm by removing everything but australia from the FOSM database (for both of these extracts, use a boundary definition that's PD.

Re: [talk-au] Going separate ways

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: No: one is a Derivative Database (ODbL) and the other a Derivative Work (CC-BY-SA), but the combination of the two is a Collective Database or Work. Depends on how you combine them. If you just put the files next to

Re: [talk-au] Going separate ways

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: No: one is a Derivative Database (ODbL) and the other a Derivative Work (CC-BY-SA), but the combination of the two is a Collective Database or Work

Re: [talk-au] Going separate ways

On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: I think it's reasonably obvious by now that the two sides in this debate aren't ever going to be reconciled. [snip] So, I think, we need to get away from this idea that a fork is a bad thing. It isn't. There are

Re: [talk-au] Going separate ways

On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: John Smith wrote: On 11 July 2011 08:16, Richard Fairhurstrich...@systemed.net  wrote: Can we not - both sides - agree to work on building up our own projects, and making them as attractive as possible to users

Re: [talk-au] Active Australian OSM contributors in light of CT/license changes

On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote: I mean throw away the efforts of all the licensing work we've done because one guy doesn't like technical detail X or has moral objection Y. That is, that we have spent many man years on this and there is no way to make

Re: [talk-au] Active Australian OSM contributors in light of CT/license changes

On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote: Anthony The reason we have a hostile relationship is because of all your spamming and trolling. I'm not FOSM, so that's rather irrelevant, even if it were true. I also thought that relationship had been mended

Re: [talk-au] Active Australian OSM contributors in light of CT/license changes

On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote: On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote: At this point really the positive gestures need to come from you, for example helping us switch so we can all (including FOSM) move on. If the only way you

Re: [talk-au] Active Australian OSM contributors in light of CT/license changes

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:26 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote: I don't see how it's reasonable to throw everything away for one guy who doesn't like his countries laws. There are more countries without sui generis database rights laws than with it.

Re: [talk-au] Active Australian OSM contributors in light of CT/license changes

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:54 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote: I would phrase it that the vast majority aren't lawyers and don't want to become one, therefore don't know the implications of the problems with cc. That is all this is predicated upon, lawyers say that cc doesn't work for data.

Re: [talk-au] Active Australian OSM contributors in light of CT/license changes

On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:37 AM, James Andrewartha tr...@student.uwa.edu.au wrote: On 8 July 2011 11:26, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote: This reads like you disagree with taxation or death. I do too, but there's not much I can do about it. The vast majority of people are happy with where we

Re: [talk-au] ODBL and real life...

On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote: On 19 June 2011 14:38, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: Forgot to mention that SVG files are most likely produced works, even those they aren't raster images, so converting to SVG and then back to map

Re: [talk-au] ODBL and real life...

On Jun 19, 2011 7:17 PM, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote: On 19 June 2011 22:20, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote: On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 18:12:25 +0100 Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote: We have people subverting our CC-BY-SA license right now!!1! *zomg* And

Re: [talk-au] ODBL and real life...

On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote: On Jun 19, 2011 7:17 PM, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote: *: Correct me if I am wrong, but the GPL also doesn't have a restrictive 'no reverse engineering' clause. The GPL isn't sold as a license which restricts

Re: [talk-au] JOSM filtering image/map tile URLs

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote: I could set up a proxy - on my squid to rewrite URL 'forbidden_image' to 'google' if I wanted. In the latest version of JOSM it's actually quite trivial to bypass the blacklist. No need to set up a proxy at all. Of

Re: [talk-au] JOSM filtering image/map tile URLs

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote: You aren't addressing the core question.  Given that the new imagery plugin has made it much simpler to accidentally infringe, is a URL blacklist a suitable way to raise that barrier closer to where it was a few weeks

Re: [talk-au] JOSM filtering image/map tile URLs

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 7:18 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: On 31 January 2011 10:04, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote: Frederik is also a member of the Data Working Group, along with myself, who have to deal with the consequences of people recklessly tracing in

Re: [talk-au] JOSM filtering image/map tile URLs

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:21 PM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote: On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 23:51 +1000, John Smith wrote: Thankfully the main author of the software seems to want a more general editor, not just one that works with OSM specific APIs etc. This makes me wonder.  Dirk has

Re: [talk-au] Fwd: license change map

On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote: I can see the legal line of thought for paying to belong to a company / organisation. I can too. Annual membership dues provide a mechanism for a member to 1) show who they are (thereby making it more difficult to obtain

Re: [talk-au] Fwd: license change map

On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: Steve Bennett wrote: Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote: 1. OSMF needs a written out strategic plan. Hear, hear. The equivalent of Patches welcome in this case is: OSMF is a democratically elected body.