Am 06.12.2010 09:46, schrieb Jacques Lys:
Hello,
In fact, PT data are most often seen by agencies as being critical
data they have to protect while submitting tender for Delegation de
Service Public.
I expected the timetables to be organized by a government supervisory
body, with only
Ok, finally someone that really knows the case! so. First, if it is
like that, then a proper authorization to use the timetables and
routes, one by one, granted by veolia, keolis and transdev would do
for a great amount of pt companies in france. Correct? I happen to
have contacted veolia's
Am 06.12.2010 14:54, schrieb Andrei Klochko:
Hi,
That is simply not true. I know what I am doing.
I would like to believe it as well, but as I know copyright laws (not of
France, but of other countries), to me it also sounds weird.
What I could suggest is to have an official, written advice
Good evening,
i admit it, I know almost nothing about law. I focused on database,
intellectual property law. These texts are quite small. I know my
interpretation has no value, which is why I just spent 1h and a half talking
to yet another lawyer. And what he told me was this: in one sentence, I
On 12/06/2010 05:07 PM, Michał Borsuk wrote:
Am 06.12.2010 15:26, schrieb Andrei Klochko:
Hello,
Yes, in France it's even worse: the database producer may forbid any
quantitatively or quantitatively substantial extraction from his
database, by all means and in any form
BUT you have this
Thank you for your answer. Indeed, it is almost impossible to prove you
indeed have the right to do anything, in the geographical data area. But to
answer to your idea of even bus stops physical locations being copyrighted,
we have the following story, that every lawyer in france takes back:
Hi all,
At http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=50.86777mlon=4.678712zoom=18layers=M
a small junction way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/8288162 exists between the
two parts of the Koning Boudewijnlaan (or Celestijnenlaan as you wish
:-)
This way is currently tagged as trunk_link
Hi,
I think the road is wrong classified.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/8288162
It should be residential and part of the Celestijnenlaan and not trunk_link
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/72912809
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/3877191
Because that is what it is there:
Gerard,
net ook de josm upgrade gedaan en met de bing assistentie is het
effectief bijzonder prettig werken
Op 3 december 2010 16:08 heeft Gerard Vanderveken g...@ghia.eu het
volgende geschreven:
Nu Bing ook in mijn JOSM beschikbaar is als satelliet achtergrond (zie Bing
thread), heb ik eens
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:41:25 +0100, Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com
wrote:
I usually tag these small ways between two lanes of a dual carriage
road with the same classification of the crossing roads, in this case
highway=unclassified. But there's no strict rule on this AFAIK, even
though we
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com wrote:
Klaas Gadeyne wrote:
This way is currently tagged as trunk_link
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Link_(highway). However, (at
least in Belgium) trunk roads are prohibited for bicycles.
Well, yes and no. Yes for 99%
I feel that it is not safe at this point. I have raised my concerns in
this thread
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-December/005299.html
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Manuel Reimer
manuel.s...@nurfuerspam.de wrote:
Hello,
is it secure to use Bing? Any license risks?
Andrew, Manuel -
On 12/06/2010 10:28 AM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
I feel that it is not safe at this point. I have raised my concerns in
this thread
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-December/005299.html
The situation is sufficient for me to use Bing imagery for tracing.
On 12/06/2010 10:18 AM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
I suppose I don't mind if a license is technically invalid because of
some obscure legal reason, I just think that the intent needs to be
there, publicly, officially, and clearly stated on what they are okay
with and what they aren't. I don't think
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
pec...@gmail.com wrote:
License is fine. It is CT which in fact still allows OSMF to change
data license to any other free license (which could be strip share
alike and attribution requirements) what blocks
Hello,
first, to put things clear, I know of Transiki, I know of Google Transit
obviously, I know of OSMand, and I know - a little - about database
copyright in France. I already asked several lawyers about my questions,
without it resulting in any clear answer. And no, what I intend to do will
On 6 December 2010 20:57, Andrei Klochko transportspl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
[snip]
strategy, to avoid trouble. Any advice on such an entreprise?
I'm not sure that this is really on topic for this list since it
doesn't impact legally on open street map (or it shouldn't). Its also
the kind
Hi,
I am sorry, you are right, based on what I said, this conversation hardly
concerns osm directly. I asked before I did not know where to start getting
real help about this. And so, thank you for your answer. It finally got into
the heart of the subject.
I never thought of that point, that
This message explains a problem that user interfaces such as Nominatim have when
choosing the correct localized 'name' tag to show to the user, why I believe
this
is caused by incomplete tagging, and a proposal to fix it.
I was surprised when searching on the OSM home page to find Edinburgh was
Hi,
On 12/06/2010 11:00 AM, Ed Avis wrote:
Given that, and the user's preferred languages [en, fr], what name should be
picked? The program cannot know that the name 'Scotland' is in English
Why? Are there places in Scotland that have a Gaelic name in the name
tag?
Bye
Frederik
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
The situation is sufficient for me to use Bing imagery for tracing. I'm not
looking at the legal side of it, I'm just looking at the size of the PR
disaster should Microsoft attempt to backtrack in any way.
PR is more
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
On 12/06/2010 11:00 AM, Ed Avis wrote:
Given that, and the user's preferred languages [en, fr], what name should
be
picked? The program cannot know that the name 'Scotland' is in English
Why? Are there places
Hi,
Ed Avis wrote:
[...]
I believe the answer, as so often, is to improve the tagging used so that
software has the information it needs. In this case an explicit English-
language name should be added, so we have
name=Scotland
name:en=Scotland
name:fr=Ecosse
Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org writes:
Given that, and the user's preferred languages [en, fr], what name should be
picked? The program cannot know that the name 'Scotland' is in English
Why? Are there places in Scotland that have a Gaelic name in the name
tag?
There may be, but in the
Le 06/12/2010 11:22, MD a écrit :
Hi,
Ed Avis wrote:
[...]
I believe the answer, as so often, is to improve the tagging used so that
software has the information it needs. In this case an explicit English-
language name should be added, so we have
name=Scotland
name:en=Scotland
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org writes:
Given that, and the user's preferred languages [en, fr], what name should be
picked? The program cannot know that the name 'Scotland' is in English
Why? Are there places in Scotland
Hi,
On 12/06/10 11:48, Ed Avis wrote:
We could add per-country or per-geographical-area rules about what the 'default'
language is.
I guess those don't have to be added, do they? Is it not implicit that
places in France will by default have the French name in their name tag?
But that
Erik,
On 12/06/10 11:19, Erik Johansson wrote:
:-) Well does anyone have code to add name as local language in
postgis, what are the options? Lets not complicate your remark by
enumerating all multilingual areas in the world, where names means
power
The question was about Nominatim
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
We could add per-country or per-geographical-area rules about what the
'default'
language is. But that seems like the wrong answer, and would give the wrong
result in many cases.
Seems like the right answer to me. There are
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
with and what they aren't. I don't think the Bing people have clearly
stated what they consider acceptable and what they don't.
It would be a very strange world if Steve Coast announced that OSM
could use Bing maps,
Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org writes:
We could add per-country or per-geographical-area rules about what the
'default' language is.
I guess those don't have to be added, do they? Is it not implicit that
places in France will by default have the French name in their name tag?
Yes, but
Hi,
So, this is awkward. According to my profile, I've agreed to the
new Contributor Terms. I have no recollection of having done so, and
obviously I don't want to agree to them while they're incompatible
with Nearmap. Sadly, the GUI doesn't tell me when this flag was set,
nor does it provide a
On 6 Dec 2010, at 10:10, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 12/06/2010 11:00 AM, Ed Avis wrote:
Given that, and the user's preferred languages [en, fr], what name should be
picked? The program cannot know that the name 'Scotland' is in English
Why? Are there places in Scotland that have a
On 06/12/10 12:09, Steve Bennett wrote:
1) Could someone please unset this flag for me: (User: stevage)
This is really a policy issue I think.
2) Could someone please tell me when it got set?
2010-08-13 01:44:38.6323 UTC
And for bonus points:
3) Could someone provide evidence that I did
On 6 December 2010 11:41, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Erik,
On 12/06/10 11:19, Erik Johansson wrote:
:-) Well does anyone have code to add name as local language in
postgis, what are the options? Lets not complicate your remark by
enumerating all multilingual areas in the
Le 06/12/2010 12:52, Steve Bennett a écrit :
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Ed Avise...@waniasset.com wrote:
We could add per-country or per-geographical-area rules about what the 'default'
language is. But that seems like the wrong answer, and would give the wrong
result in many cases.
Brian Quinion openstreetmap at brian.quinion.co.uk writes:
This is the approach I've already taken - the next version of
Nominatim has a field country_default_language_code as part of the
country details
OK I guess that takes care of it, so we don't need additional per-object tags.
This list is
On 6 December 2010 13:18, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Brian Quinion openstreetmap at brian.quinion.co.uk writes:
This list is entirely of my own construction and probably misses
quite a few countries default languages. I welcome any improvements!
Shouldn't it be tagged as part of the
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com
wrote:
with and what they aren't. I don't think the Bing people have clearly
stated what they consider acceptable and what they don't.
It would be
This should really be taking place on the legal list but nonetheless:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
So, this is awkward. According to my profile, I've agreed to the
new Contributor Terms. I have no recollection of having done so, and
obviously I
On 6 December 2010 23:55, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
This should really be taking place on the legal list but nonetheless:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
So, this is awkward. According to my profile, I've agreed to the
new
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
So, this is awkward.
From a pragmatic legal perspective, it seems to me that any
nearmap-sourced edits that I made while under the effects of the CT
are totally invalid anyway, so should be moved to a non-CT
I think that the pertinent question is whether Steve deliberately
accepted the CT and license or was he hijacked by a bad UI.
David.
PS. Wow, reading all of the emails on this subject over the last
year, it is clear that this license issue and the way that it has been
handled is obviously the
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
Erik,
On 12/06/10 11:19, Erik Johansson wrote:
:-) Well does anyone have code to add name as local language in
postgis, what are the options? Lets not complicate your remark by
enumerating all multilingual areas in the world, where names means
power
The question was
Hi all,
For those of you wondering when the Bing aerials were photographed for
your area (like me), I created a viewer for that.
Give it a try:
http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bing/
It uses the date given in a Bing custom HTTP header, which is often
correct, but not always. Date error
On 6 December 2010 14:55, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
So, this is awkward. According to my profile, I've agreed to the
new Contributor Terms. I have no recollection of having done so, and
obviously I
- Original Message -
From: Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com
To: Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
Cc: Open Street Map mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Unsetting CT flag
This should really be taking place on the legal
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:42 AM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 December 2010 14:55, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
So, this is awkward. According to my profile, I've agreed to the
new
2010/12/6 Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:42 AM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 December 2010 14:55, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
So, this is awkward.
There are likely to be cases where two or more of the possible languages use an
identical name for the same location or entity. Plus, in addition to any
official languages for a particular country, you may have additional languages
spoken by the local people. For example, the official
Hi,
pec...@gmail.com wrote:
License is fine. It is CT which in fact still allows OSMF to change
data license to any other free license (which could be strip share
alike and attribution requirements) what blocks usage. In fact,
there is NO license which allows such CT to coexist. Only PD, and
Same situation with osmosis 0.38, only node no ways
Carsten
Den 05-12-2010 20:50, Carsten Nielsen skrev:
I dont recall where I saw the --read-bin option but se it is also mentioned in the
recent geofabrik blogpost http://blog.geofabrik.de/en/?p=75
and yes I have tried to replace it with the
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
pec...@gmail.com wrote:
License is fine. It is CT which in fact still allows OSMF to change
data license to any other free license (which could be strip share
alike and attribution requirements) what blocks
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 08:55 -0500, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
This should really be taking place on the legal list but nonetheless:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
So, this is awkward. According to my profile, I've agreed to the
new Contributor
Am 06.12.2010 17:58, schrieb Serge Wroclawski:
The LWG is part of the OSMF, and the OSMF is who runs this project.
The LWG is part of the OSMF, and the OSMF is part of the ~3 people
who runs this project :-)
Regards, ULFL
___
talk mailing
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 09:41:05 -0500
Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
We're* also expecting to implement a way for you to flag edits that
shouldn't be promoted to CT/ODbL, so you'll be able to accept CT, and
flag those changesets that are incompatible individually. The bad
ones won't be
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 21:15 +0100, Ulf Lamping wrote:
Am 06.12.2010 17:58, schrieb Serge Wroclawski:
The LWG is part of the OSMF, and the OSMF is who runs this project.
The LWG is part of the OSMF, and the OSMF is part of the ~3 people
who runs this project :-)
If the OSMF board
On 05/12/2010 22:07, Anthony wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
As long as there are external ways connecting to the area, a router should
be able to find the appropriate entrances exits by tracking the perimeter.
I thought they were already able to
Just saw a tweet from Ed Parsons that might be relevant to glittermap!
Use with care animated pins http://goo.gl/a3Q8g, could be the mapping
equivalent of blink/blink
Toby
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Steven Johnson sejohns...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, glitter today, dragons sea monsters
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 20:56 +, Dave F. wrote:
- which, if all they
know about is the perimeter, is probably a good thing.
Eh? I thought you said you'd love it if it cut directly across an area??
They don't have to *follow* the perimeter just use it to find the best
exit then
On 06/12/2010 21:06, David Murn wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 20:56 +, Dave F. wrote:
- which, if all they
know about is the perimeter, is probably a good thing.
Eh? I thought you said you'd love it if it cut directly across an area??
They don't have to *follow* the perimeter just use
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 21:18 +, Dave F. wrote:
On 06/12/2010 21:06, David Murn wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 20:56 +, Dave F. wrote:
- which, if all they
know about is the perimeter, is probably a good thing.
Eh? I thought you said you'd love it if it cut directly across an
On 6 December 2010 20:44, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 08:55 -0500, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
This should really be taking place on the legal list but nonetheless:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
So, this is
On 06/12/2010 21:42, David Murn wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 21:18 +, Dave F. wrote:
On 06/12/2010 21:06, David Murn wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 20:56 +, Dave F. wrote:
- which, if all they
know about is the perimeter, is probably a good thing.
Eh? I thought you said you'd love
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 22:45:00 +0100
andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
If Nearmap is CC-BY-SA, they're compatible now.
What about at changeover though? Im pretty sure Steve asked this
question in relation to data in the future, not the present.
It's incompatible even at
Just saw a tweet from Ed Parsons that might be relevant to glittermap!
Use with care animated pins http://goo.gl/a3Q8g, could be the mapping
equivalent of blink/blink
So fun! Really addictive game, how can we feed them?
___
talk mailing list
On 6 December 2010 23:23, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
If Nearmap is CC-BY-SA, they're compatible now.
What about at changeover though? Im pretty sure Steve asked this
question in relation to data in the future, not the present.
It's incompatible even at present.
could you
Congrats! good luck!
mike
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Emilie Laffray
emi...@osmfoundation.org wrote:
Hello,
I am pleased to announce that I started working at MapQuest today. I want to
let the OSM community know how excited I am about this new opportunity. I
will continue in my capacity
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 05/12/2010 22:07, Anthony wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
As long as there are external ways connecting to the area, a router
should
be able to find the appropriate
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:42 PM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
However, please understand that
most of us use routing software, expecting it not to try and take
shortcuts across unmapped areas.
Who said anything about taking shortcuts across *unmapped* areas? How
in the world would
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Emilie Laffray emi...@osmfoundation.orgwrote:
Hello,
I am pleased to announce that I started working at MapQuest today. I want
to let the OSM community know how excited I am about this new opportunity. I
will continue in my capacity as an elected member of the
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
The CT isn't a license, it's a terms of agreement. That means you've
given OSMF a license to the data, and now you're asking them to revoke
that license.
This would be (moral if not legal) equivalent of someone offering
Welcome! And not a moment too soon!
-Randy
On Dec 6, 2010 5:59 PM, Emilie Laffray emi...@osmfoundation.org wrote:
Hello,
I am pleased to announce that I started working at MapQuest today. I want
to
let the OSM community know how excited I am about this new opportunity. I
will continue in my
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 10:00:57AM +, Ed Avis wrote:
In an attempt to fix this I have asked the maintainer of
http://keepright.ipax.at/ to add a data check. Where a choice of languages
exists for a name, then there should be one that corresponds to the main
'name' tag. In other words
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
PR is more important than legal. As most people on this list know, with
CC-BY-SA being next to invalid for Geodata in the US, any of the big US
players could long have taken our data an run. Why haven't they?
Because they
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 05/12/2010 22:07, Anthony wrote:
- which, if all they
know about is the perimeter, is probably a good thing.
Eh? I thought you said you'd love it if it cut
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 18:21 -0500, Anthony wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:42 PM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
However, please understand that
most of us use routing software, expecting it not to try and take
shortcuts across unmapped areas.
Who said anything about taking
Hi,
On 06.12.2010 19:58, Carsten Nielsen wrote:
Same situation with osmosis 0.38, only node no ways
on talk-de had been similar reports. Frederik mentioned he will replace
the version on the server.
Stephan
___
talk mailing list
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:11 PM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 18:21 -0500, Anthony wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:42 PM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
However, please understand that
most of us use routing software, expecting it not to try and
Hi all,
For those of you wondering when the Bing aerials were photographed for
your area (like me), I created a viewer for that.
Give it a try:
http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bing/
It uses the date given in a Bing custom HTTP header, which is often
correct, but not always. Date error
Beste,
wij willen in onze fietsrouteplanners graag een aanmoediging opnemen de
kaart te verbeteren als je ergens lokale kennis hebt.
In eerste instantie een verwijzing naar
www.openstreetmap.nl/content/zelf-de-kaart-bewerken.html, plus voor wie
dat te ingewikkeld vindt een verwijzing naar
2010/12/6 dbuss...@goudappel.nl:
wij willen in onze fietsrouteplanners graag een aanmoediging opnemen de
kaart te verbeteren als je ergens lokale kennis hebt.
In eerste instantie een verwijzing naar
www.openstreetmap.nl/content/zelf-de-kaart-bewerken.html, plus voor wie dat
te ingewikkeld
Eu tinha pensado numa solução mais simples: converter a imagem para um PNG
na maior resolução possível, tomar umas 3 ou 4 coordenadas a partir das
imagens de satélite com a melhor precisão possível e traçar as ruas sobre as
imagens usando um plugin apropriado para imagens não-georeferenciadas.
Estou conseguindo coletar muitas ruas aqui da minha região usando as imagens
do Bing. Será que esses PDFs não seriam úteis no que diz respeito aos nomes
das ruas?
Em 6 de dezembro de 2010 14:15, Arlindo Pereira
openstreet...@arlindopereira.com escreveu:
Eu tinha pensado numa solução mais
É justamente o que ia perguntar. Seria possível utilizar as cartas
somente como fonte dos nomes das ruas?
2010/12/6 Rodrigo de Avila rodr...@avila.net.br:
Estou conseguindo coletar muitas ruas aqui da minha região usando as imagens
do Bing. Será que esses PDFs não seriam úteis no que diz
Hér er allavega söluáróður frá umboðsaðila Garmin á Íslandi
http://garmin.is/product/kort/islandskort.shtml
Þar kemur m.a. fram að þeir hafi:
* Hámarkshraða vega
* Hæðarlínur með 20 metra millibili
* Strandlínu
* Vötn
* Útlínur jökla, þjóðgarða og friðlanda
* Gönguleiðir
* Vegir og götur
*
2010/12/6 Svavar Kjarrval sva...@kjarrval.is:
Var að hringja í Fasteignaskrá og vildi forvitnast hvort við gætum fengið
GPS hnit úr staðfangaskrá fyrir allt landið en fékk það svar að það myndi
kosta um 200 þúsund krónur. Þess vegna datt mér í hug hvort við gætum reynt
að fá gögnin ókeypis og
Hallo Gary.
Am Samstag 04 Dezember 2010, 10:34:33 schrieb Gary68:
ich nehme jetzt noch die typen farm, locality und region raus und dann
läuft das immer anfang des monats, wie auch unmapped. gerade läuft eine
aktualisierung...
oder auf anfrage!
Wirklich, die Liste ist super.
Ich habe am
Zitat Wolfgang:
[ Wegpunkte exakt vermessen]
Die Genauigkeit wird irgendwo zwischen 1 und 2 m liegen. Genauer ginge es
mit dgps-fähigen Geräten.
Letzte Woche habe ich auf einem Garmin GPSmap 60CSx in Verbindung mit einer
externen Antenne (Gilsson MCX) fuer einen Wegpunkt eine geschaezte
Am Montag 06 Dezember 2010, 09:17:24 schrieb Bernd Wurst:
Allerdings stören die locality-Objekte schon ein wenig
Jetzt bin ich verwirrt.
Ich bin mir sicher, dass ich gestern auch mal die Seite reloaded hatte. Heute
allerdings hat die Seite da da im Seitenkopf:
| file
Hallo,
Am Montag 06 Dezember 2010 09:20:40 schrieb Michael Buege:
Zitat Wolfgang:
[ Wegpunkte exakt vermessen]
Die Genauigkeit wird irgendwo zwischen 1 und 2 m liegen. Genauer ginge es
mit dgps-fähigen Geräten.
Letzte Woche habe ich auf einem Garmin GPSmap 60CSx in Verbindung mit einer
Vielen Dank!
Lg
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Am 04.12.2010 23:58, schrieb Gehling Marc:
Wie jede Woche haben wir die Neuigkeiten aus dem OSM-Universum in der
Wochennotiz zusammengetragen:
http://blog.openstreetmap.de/2010/12/osm-wochennotiz-nr-20/
Viel Spaß beim Lesen!
Danke, gibt es irgendwo Erläuterungen zu den verlinkten Videos
* geo.osm geo@googlemail.com [2010-12-03 17:11]:
Hab gerade nach der Anleitung mein gut funktionierendes WMS (auch mit Bing)
und slippymap ausgenockt und imaginary als einziges Plugin aktiviert.
so nu is Bing auch weg, auch in den Einstellungen und der Auswahl der
diversen wms plugins
Am 06.12.2010 um 11:11 schrieb Chris66:
Am 04.12.2010 23:58, schrieb Gehling Marc:
Wie jede Woche haben wir die Neuigkeiten aus dem OSM-Universum in der
Wochennotiz zusammengetragen:
http://blog.openstreetmap.de/2010/12/osm-wochennotiz-nr-20/
Viel Spaß beim Lesen!
Danke, gibt es
Am 06.12.2010 15:08, schrieb Jonas K.:
Danke, gibt es irgendwo Erläuterungen zu den verlinkten Videos
(Codeswarm, Vandalism/Hidden Message) ?
Ich glaube es gibt nicht mehr, als das was unter den Video steht.
Der Codeswarm ist eben dieser typische Codeswarm, denn man mit einem
einfachen
Wikimedia Deutschland hat heute das Ergebnis des
WissensWert-Wettbewerbes bekanntgegegen [1].
Zwei der 8 Gewinner haben mit OSM zu tun:
Luftbilder für OpenStreetMap von OSM-Stammtisch Dortmund (Marc Gehling,
Olaf Kotzte) [2]
und
Barrierefreies Onlineportal für Karten- und Routing-Services von
dank dir für das Skript.
Unter Windows wird die Umsetzung ja schon wieder zu nem Geduldsspiel. Da
ist es fast einfacher ich lege im Imagery die Einträge neu an und
kopiere mir dazu die vorher per copy/paste gesicherten Einträge zurück.
--
schönen Gruß
Alex
hi
ba-wü kommt nachher, wenn ich zu hause bin neu mit daten von
heute/geofabrik. sollte also drin sein.
zu dem anderen problem unten: alle false positives wird man nicht
rausbekommen, oder? oder hat jemand eine idee, wie das zu lösen ist?
ciao
gerhard
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 09:17 +0100, Bernd
ausgezeichnet!!! Super!
mike
2010/12/6 Raimond Spekking raimond.spekk...@gmail.com:
Wikimedia Deutschland hat heute das Ergebnis des
WissensWert-Wettbewerbes bekanntgegegen [1].
Zwei der 8 Gewinner haben mit OSM zu tun:
Luftbilder für OpenStreetMap von OSM-Stammtisch Dortmund (Marc Gehling,
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo
