On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 06:24:25PM +0100, Roy Jamison wrote:
I have tried using the JOSM plugin to trace buildings but can't get it
to work, it keeps coming up with a problem with the child process. Is
Same here: see http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/5068
ael
from gps and photos unless there was a very good reason.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 06:14:42PM +, Ed Avis wrote:
ael law_ence@... writes:
And I would take a dim view of anyone removing names that I have
entered from gps and photos unless there was a very good reason.
A different name in the Ordnance Survey maps is such a very good reason
adding that to
shop=trade
trade=fruiterer
perhaps?
See
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtrade
which you might extend if you think this is the right approach.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 01:58:43PM +, Craig Loftus wrote:
I like the idea. And although I like the simplicity, I think it might be
worth somehow taking account for seasonable variability. There a number of
Agreed. In Cornwall, for example, roads that are very quiet for most of
the year
reference to a good approximation to
(lat,long) isn't *that* difficult, surely? My Garmin does it a less than
a ms or so with very low computing power.
Or am I being naive?
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
might
be able to gps survey some of them if traces are missing. Time (and
petrol - I am cautious about cycling on narrow lanes with high banks)
permitting.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
, so the attribution
looks ok to me. Am I right?
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
, then it can
be useful even if the closure is only for a week.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Some tiles on an area that I recently edited seem to be blank?
Example:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.45764lon=-4.45504zoom=17layers=M
I guess this is because of the hardware failure reported at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Platform_Status ?
ael
Hello,
I noticed that Siblyback Lake:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.5077lon=-4.49397zoom=15layers=M
is not rendering properly (in Mapnik, at least).
I emailed the last user to modify the area, and he said that he
had tried to fix it without success: it was already broken.
I confess that
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 12:53:46PM +, John Baker wrote:
I deleted that relation 2759916 seems to be a dup of 2759917
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2759917which was/is the same and
has more details and they were created on the same date.
Renders ok now.
Thanks for all the
I have just noticed another (mapnik?) rendering problem on the boundary
between Cornwall and Devon. In fact it may be the boundary itself that
is the problem:
admin_level = 6
boundary = administrative
left:county = Devon
name = River Tamar
right:county = Cornwall
source =
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 08:34:19PM +0100, Christopher Baines wrote:
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 19:57 +0100, ael wrote:
I have just noticed another (mapnik?) rendering problem on the boundary
between Cornwall and Devon. In fact it may be the boundary itself that
is the problem:
admin_level
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 08:09:49PM +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On 13 September 2013 19:59, ael law_ence@ntlworld.com wrote:
No one has mentioned the OS gps (passive) stations: for example
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/472420260
It's rather ironic that that node carries
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 02:24:31PM +0100, OpenStreetmap HADW wrote:
On 13 September 2013 19:59, ael law_ence@ntlworld.com wrote:
No one has mentioned the OS gps (passive) stations: for example
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/472420260
http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/business
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 02:24:31PM +0100, OpenStreetmap HADW wrote:
On 13 September 2013 19:59, ael law_ence@ntlworld.com wrote:
No one has mentioned the OS gps (passive) stations: for example
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/472420260
http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/business
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 02:24:31PM +0100, OpenStreetmap HADW wrote:
On 13 September 2013 19:59, ael law_ence@ntlworld.com wrote:
No one has mentioned the OS gps (passive) stations: for example
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/472420260
http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/business
I have just uploaded a single trace. But I am getting the remarkable
message:
You have 385 traces waiting for upload. Please consider waiting for
these to finish before uploading any more, so as not to block the queue
for other users.
Not so. 385 is the total number of traces I have ever uploaded
by routers?
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
vehicles can not pass in either
direction which does not match the signage.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
on a node,
that is much simpler and thus vastly superior.
I hope that I have the syntax correct. Thanks for all the various
suggestions. I would not have found all those corners of the wiki
without this help.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
to *use* the
map?
Potential contributors will want to be convinced that the map is useful
before being motivated to join.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
map page is superb. So congratulations to everyone who has
worked on it, and responded to feedback.
This email was delayed by system reconfiguration ...
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
=post_office
to the to the same node as the shop tag? Or add a second node? Or
something else?
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 07:39:49PM +0100, Dan S wrote:
2014-10-25 17:48 GMT+01:00 ael law_ence@ntlworld.com:
I have made a large update to the UK retail chain page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_Retail_Chains
I am not sure that this is on topic here, but I didn't see
the semantics, but I don't think that
would be very obvious to the average user, who may not be a mapper at
all. He/she needs to know he has to go inside WHS to find the Post Office.
I suppose the obvious rendering would be as you suggest: WHS as an area
containing the PO. Ho hum...
ael
and has only contributed two edits. However,
there is a tag 'proposed:highway=no' which I don't understand, so
perhaps that is just a mistake and it should be proposed:highway=yes?
I suggest that someone who knows the area should check and maybe contact
the mapper to clarify.
ael
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 05:22:53PM +0100, ael wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:22:48AM +0100, Jason Woollacott wrote:
Looks like there has been an issue with changeset 30821940 Which seems to
have added the A30 through the whole of Cornwall on an incorrect route.
https
and if and when I remember or have
time I may check properly. Casting my eye down the list, I can only see
one that I don't immediately recognise as something I have mapped.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https
there, it was embarrasing when showing openstreet(map)
to newbies to have to explain that the many significant (often low)
bridges in the area carrying abandoned mining railways over roads were
mapped, but not visible.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
ide a
proper explanation. The sheer scale is highly suspicious.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
to use the tag to record that
there are other tracks.
I agree that this is not going to be common, but it still seems to have
utility.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 06:41:23PM +0100, Phil Endecott wrote:
>
> How would people find this for tracing compared to photo imagery?
It looks excellent, at least at first glance. Thanks so much for all the
work.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
T
already takes too much of my
time.
Apologies for being grumpy: or maybe I have just overlooked something?
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 09:09:00PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 27/06/16 20:27, ael wrote:
>
>
> Nothing in the GPX upload page has been changed for years.
>
> > I have just had to waste time clicking up and down a tree of stupid
> > (sorry) icons instead of
e unless it
was using diffferential gps. But my experience of many armchair mappers
is that they just ride roughshod and ignore source tags and the like.
To be fair, the editors don't help with this, and it can be tedious and
time consuming to review the history
s you can see there, their email address is
witney.libr...@oxfordshire.gov.uk .
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
I have just searched on the wiki looking for a tag for a (metal) scrap
yard. I tried scrap yard, recycling and waste disposal among others.
What is the right tag (for an area)?
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https
will have time to do a thorough job any time soon.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
So he was communicating back then (Feb 2016) at least once.
He didn't comment on the fact that I knew the area rather well and had
extensively surveyed with gps and photography
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
lematical. I didn't touch adjacent areas
although I was sure they were wrong.
In the light of these discussion, I now feel more bold about perhaps
just deleting more of this junk unless someone/ some group undertakes
bulkish reversion.
ael
___
Tal
uld urge you to make some
sort of comment, even if brief, and maybe repetitive where you are doing
similar things.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
treetmap.org/node/2513244479
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
y as yet.
Is anyone familiar with this App and whether the mapping is legitimate?
The user has not uploaded any gps traces which may or may not be
relevant.
I have my own gps Waypoint for the cafe (I was about to add the fhrs:id)
so I can remap it the current version i
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 08:49:32PM +0100, ael wrote:
> I have just found a local cafe added to OSM by "MAPS.ME android 6.2.5-Google",
> at least that was the "created by" tag.
I think that I may now have answered my own question. Digging into the
Knowledge base on the
skeard Cornwall. The address is Coldstyle
Road, but searching the fhrs data for the name with or without the
street name returns no results. Perhaps I misunderstand
osm-unmatched-no-postcode-379.gpx ? Am I wrong in assuming this only
includes places with an FHRS rating?
ael
___
Perhaps we should have something like "notname", "wrongdisplay" perhaps,
to alert the FSA in such cases?
I am not too serious since we are only providing the id rather than the
absolute value of the rating, and we don't want to alienate companies,
even when they may not be the mo
heath: that was almost 1 year ago, so this has been going on for
a long time.
The mapper replied politely saying that he had used Bing imagery, but
conceded that "moorland" was more accurate. But added that moorland was
not rendered.
I commented back then on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changes
d there is always a flow of some sort, either
> from the A1 or from the side roads.
>
So far no one has mentioned the hazard tag. Surely that is the obvious
and flexible solution here?
I have tagged some dangerous open mine shafts in Cornwall with
hazard=yes. Being too strict about what is &q
sponse.
Anyway, I suspect that this is a problem over large areas.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
ed a visit, and asking
about that map.
Is this likley to be legitimate?
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 06:57:58PM +, Chris Hill wrote:
> On 24/03/2017 17:58, ael wrote:
> > I have just noticed a newish mapper who has added many footpaths around
> > Oxfordshire apparently using Bing but with changset comments
> > "from countryside access map&qu
gt; is maybe a better option.
>
That sounds much better, although maybe there is a need for a new
restriction tag.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:00:15AM +0100, David Woolley wrote:
> On 29/03/17 21:32, ael wrote:
> > and, for good measure, hgv=permissive.
>
> Permissive sounds wrong to me. Permissive basically reflects the rights of
> the land owner, and for users is the same as yes.
Well
knowledge of my invented
rest_area value might direct other vehicles there.
I think these restricted parking lanes are fairly common.
I not very comfortable with using rest_area for laybys, anyway, but that
seems to be the current recommendation on the wiki.
Is there a better
m fairly confident that I only discovered
them by accident. And none of the 3 suggested causes applies in my case.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
: I didn't find anything on a quick search of the OpenStreetCam
site.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
eral as to be pretty useless. The
original meaning was pretty specific and useful. "Moor" or something
equivalant is well understood (in the UK, at least) and is useful as
a broad description where detailed mapping is absent.
Anyway, I take it
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 06:04:32PM +0100, Elizabeth Oldham wrote:
> On 25/09/17 17:13, ael wrote:
>
> > Well, surely this make the tag so general as to be pretty useless. The
> > original meaning was pretty specific and useful. "Moor" or something
> > equiva
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 05:51:18PM +0100, Kevin Peat wrote:
> >Anyway, I take it that no one is objecting to my changes and wanting to
> >revert them?
> >
> >ael
> >
> >
> >___
> >Talk-GB ma
gs, I would go for
natural = grassland;wetland as the best approximation despite the
fact that not everything is wet nor is grass.
Of course, it only makes sense for coarse-grained approximate mapping,
and more localised accurate tags are the ideal.
Should "moor" or someth
Not sure this is the right list, but I guess admins are on this list.
We have a spammer:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Digital%20Torque%20Wrench
who just "added me as a friend".
Can someone remove and block the account?
Thanks,
ael
_
b/2017-February/019903.html
> ).
I do hope that this can be stopped sooner rather than later. It caused
huge problems around Bodmin Moor. By the time people had noticed, the
large changes were entangled with later edits and it was really
difficult to correct things without destroying later useful work.
them unmodified rendering them incorrect. They should append
";navads_shell" or some such if the import goes ahead.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
/maps/map/map.html#zoom=18=51.344207=-2.344501
Oops. Sorry. I didn't scroll down far enough to notice that the point
was already made!
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
highly significant particulary where they cross roads.
Just because the railway is dismantled or abandoned does not mean the
bridges have magically evaporated.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
near Manchester.
I am normally extremely respectful of other mappers' work, but this is
one area where I find that it is just too difficult to avoid possible
minor damage. Maybe I just haven't found the right tools.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
e explicit
actions surrounded with warnings, to allow coincident ways to share
nodes - apart from the obvious exceptions like junctions ?
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
it seems very natural.
I would have thought that this a common situation, so I am a bit bemused
that it doesn't seem to be covered anywhere. Or am I missing
something blindingly obvious?
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 12:49:47PM +0100, Andy Townsend wrote:
>
> Maybe a compromise might be (assuming the licence is suitable) importing only
> the "designation" tag for entirely new footways (i.e. without a highway tag
> at all)?
An excellent idea, bu
had time to do much armchair imagery mapping. There are
maybe around 3 fairly active mappers in East Cornwall.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 04:20:31PM +0100, ajt1...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 29/07/2019 11:21, ael wrote:
> > In the case that I mentioned, it was certainly not from their own GPS
> > logs.
>
> A few examples I came across while looking at these with a DWG hat on were
> also no
s are
no more than construction tracks as yet. Nearly the whole of that site
was mapped before any imagery was available from multiple visits with
fairly accurate gps. Those gps tracks are public and can be inspected.
It is overdue for another visit.
ael
_
regular gps surveys.
Sadly, it is not only Amazon armchair mappers who neglect to do basic checks
before changing things.
So, yes, I have some concerns. But maybe they are doing useful work in
area without local mappers. Perhaps they should be encouraged to be more
c
se that I mentioned, it was certainly not from their own GPS
logs. The construction area was inaccesible, even on a bicycle. It
was definitely armchair mapping.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
hat good imagery evidence can sometimes do if there
are no local mappers.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
cks. And its offsets don't match those for
Maxbox. I think it is marked "beta" presumably in case of these sorts
of problem.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
air distance and it probably won't happen. Anyone in that
area?
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
ive stations which are
usually small pillars a few cm high. Most (all?) are now "legacy"
but they ought to be much more accurate than the much older trig
points.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
rejected by
the list software, and maybe a bit antisocial for those with limited
bandwidth...
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
everal months each year in the area so I am getting
close to being regular.
ael/messpert
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.41900/-4.23429
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
problems when run on slow limited
machines? Developers may not notice because they are usually using
fairly powerful systems. An accidental drag may not show up for a second
or more and can be overlooked.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstre
embankment there. But I suspect this is tagging for the renderer to
make ancient monumnets more obvious on the standard map.
I suggest that every one check their local historic sites for any
unjustified modifications.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing li
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 09:18:59PM +, David Woolley wrote:
> On 14/03/2020 18:09, ael wrote:
> > I have just noticed some new "Embankments" added around a fortnight ago.
> > These were added to some stone circles in Cornwall which I know well and
>
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 04:08:45PM +0100, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
>
>
> Mar 15, 2020, 22:36 by witwa...@disroot.org:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 09:18:59PM +, David Woolley wrote:
> >
> >> On 14/03/2020 18:09, ael wrote:
> >> > I have
ere destined to become highways or paths. I had to ask for a reversion.
I doubt that an AI system would be any better than Amazon humans.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
oned. But where an edit goes
ahead for good reason, the previous source tag should usually be
expanded rather than overwritten. IMHO.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 06:09:26PM +, ael wrote:
> I have just noticed some new "Embankments" added around a fortnight ago.
> These were added to some stone circles in Cornwall which I know well and
>
> I have added a changeset comment.
> https://www.openstreetm
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 03:08:39PM +, ael wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 06:09:26PM +0000, ael wrote:
> > I have just noticed some new "Embankments" added around a fortnight ago.
> > These were added to some stone circles in Cornwall which I know well and
> >
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:25:24AM +, Devonshire wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020, at 2:08 AM, Warin wrote:
> > On 17/3/20 8:02 am, ael wrote:
>
> The inability to mark an object's location as "authorititive" has always
> seemed like a massive shortcoming of the pr
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:25:24AM +, Devonshire wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020, at 2:08 AM, Warin wrote:
> > On 17/3/20 8:02 am, ael wrote:
>
> The inability to mark an object's location as "authorititive" has always
> seemed like a massive shortcoming of the pr
way better
then using imagery with the poor resolution, parallax errors and all the
rest, which is probably what the user used.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 01:08:52PM +1100, Warin wrote:
> On 17/3/20 8:02 am, ael wrote:
> >
> > I have only just got around to looking in more detail, and discovered
> > that it is much worse than I had realised: vandalism.
> >
> > I have taken waypoints on ne
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 10:45:53AM +1100, Warin wrote:
> On 18/3/20 1:42 am, ael wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:25:24AM +, Devonshire wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020, at 2:08 AM, Warin wrote:
> > > > On 17/3/20 8:02 am, ael wrote:
> > > The
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 04:18:02:PM +, Andy Townsend wrote:
> On 16/03/2020 15:36, ael wrote:
> >
> > There has now been had one short reply essentially admitting tagging for
> > the renderer. I haven't replied as yet, but Andy has.
>
> In this case it looks lik
n alone.
>
I just checked a couple of areas that I know, and the locations are
wildly inaccurate. Most of the "missing" defibs were inside buildings
which would not normally be entered by anyone doing OSM surveying. So
our coverage of publically visible defi
it isn't a "shop"? The trade tag is intended
for places that cater in a professional way to trade customers, but also
include ordinary retail.
I suppose that if there really are "shops" which are trade only one
could add a subtag like trade_only = yes.
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 02:59:41PM +0100, ael wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:27:20PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB wrote:
> > I encountered https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/issues/4140
> > and it is hard to me how it should be decided.
>
> I ori
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
