Volgens mij is deze situatie weer veel te complex getekend. Er geen
fysische scheiding, enkel een witte lijn en dan hoef je geen 2
enkelrichtingswegen te tekenen.
Aangezien er bovendien massa's buslijnen overlopen is, vind ik het teveel
werk om er even tijdens een lunchpauze aan te beginnen:
Ja, zo vlak bij het station zijn er natuurlijk nogal wat busroutes en hun
variantes tot in der treure...
Ik ben er aan begonnen. Tot binnen een paar weken, lol.
Jo
Op 3 juli 2014 12:42 schreef Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com:
Volgens mij is deze situatie weer veel te complex getekend. Er
Hi,
In Wallonia hikes, StijnRR http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/StijnRR
was removing without any notification ref=ID, changing route=hiking to
=foot, removing the ID from name= ...
As the documentation was virtually null, I modified this paragraph
On Friday 04 July 2014 01:59:26 André Pirard wrote:
So, apparently personal
hiking routes which are not signposted shouldn't be added to OSM...
OK, but
does that really mean that in regions where no one cares to signpost hikes
and where those WL people find very nice ones, OSM would be
Hi,
I agree that the render-all-approach is useful in some cases, but - on
which ones?
In low zoom levels (z0-15) it tends to get overwhelmingly cluttered by
features while on the other hand lots of them have to be dropped at
random because of geometric restrictions - there's limited space on the
I second this. Even some form of SVG would be an improvement over nothing
or having to load something through JOSM for some glancing by area...
On Jul 3, 2014 6:51 AM, Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de wrote:
Hi,
I agree that the render-all-approach is useful in some cases, but - on
Impressionante, inventaram uma etiqueta 2014worldcup=venue. Será que
devemos mandar pro WorstOfOsm, ou guardar pro próximo 1º de abril pra
tentar formalizar a etiqueta? :P (Esse ano quase formalizaram a
etiqueta cloud=* pra mapear nuvens. :P)
2014-07-03 10:39 GMT-03:00 John Packer
2014-07-03 15:21 GMT-03:00 Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com:
Impressionante, inventaram uma etiqueta 2014worldcup=venue. Será que
devemos mandar pro WorstOfOsm, ou guardar pro próximo 1º de abril pra
tentar formalizar a etiqueta? :P (Esse ano quase formalizaram a
etiqueta cloud=*
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/281967317
Fiz isso por orientação de alguém do IRC. Não lembro de se foi naoliv ou
Skippern, ou outro.
Consulta Overpass que usei para ver se eu tinha feito:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/42u
Em 3 de julho de 2014 15:21, Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com
Kkk, a imaginação do pessoal é deveras impressionante.
Quanto a Arena Itaquera até o fim de semana farei a correção e algum
eventual ajuste necessário.
___
Reinaldo Neves
Equação Informática
E: (11) 3221-3722
:: rne...@equacao.com.br
-Mensagem original-
De:
Pode consertar?
On 3 Jul 2014 15:38, Alexandre Magno Brito de Medeiros
alexandre@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/281967317
Fiz isso por orientação de alguém do IRC. Não lembro de se foi naoliv ou
Skippern, ou outro.
Consulta Overpass que usei para ver se eu tinha
2014-07-03 15:37 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Magno Brito de Medeiros
alexandre@gmail.com:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/281967317
Fiz isso por orientação de alguém do IRC. Não lembro de se foi naoliv ou
Skippern, ou outro.
Eu não falei para criar 2014worldcup
Acho que alguém comentou no IRC de
Feito! http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/281967317
Em 3 de julho de 2014 15:47, Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com
escreveu:
Pode consertar?
On 3 Jul 2014 15:38, Alexandre Magno Brito de Medeiros
alexandre@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/281967317
Fiz isso
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7La0UXec3A
Apresentação do State of the Map deste ano sobre o openstreetmap-carto,
software que gera as imagens que vemos no mapa principal do OSM.
O Andy Allan, autor do projeto, demonstra os passos necessários para rodar
o software em seu computador, o que é um
Am 01.07.2014 11:51, schrieb Sven Geggus:
Ich finde ehrlich gesagt, dass tools wie brouter
http://brouter.de/brouter-web/
sehr brauchbare Radrouten berechnen.
Yepp, mir hat der bisher auch immer sehr vernünftige Routen
geliefert.
Wenn die vorhanden Möglichkeiten (z.B. tracktype, surface)
Am 03.07.2014 17:02, schrieb chris66:
Yepp, mir hat der bisher auch immer sehr vernünftige Routen
geliefert.
Kleine Ergänzung: Als ich vom Ahlener Bahnhof heute den kürzesten Weg
Home mit meinem Garmin suchte gab es einen Routenberechnungsfehler.
Ursache war natürlich wieder mal eine der
Auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Deutsche_Postdienstleister
steht, dass eine Paketanahmestelle für Hermes mit brand=Hermes getaggt
wird. Aber wie tagge ich so eine kleine Paketannahmestelle, die meistens
mit in einen Kiosk integriert sind? Gruß Johannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Alsoo: Erstmal die Daten verbessern und dann kann man schauen ob
man wirklich noch ein neues Tag benötigt.
Sehe ich genauso. Wir haben schon einige Tags (smoothness, surface,
maxspeed, lcn, class:bicycle, lit und einige mehr), die die Router nur mal
berücksichtigen bräuchten. Noch ein Tag
Ich habe es meist so gelöst, dass ich das Ladengeschäft als Fläche
gemappt habe, in den ich einen Punkt mit der Paketannahmestelle gelegt habe.
MfG Andreas
Am 03.07.2014 21:56, schrieb Johannes:
Auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Deutsche_Postdienstleister
steht, dass eine
ich mache es so, dass ich das Hauptgeschäft (Kiosk, Schreibwarenladen
oder Reisebüro,...) als Fläche tagge und dann für Nebenbei-amenities wie
Postbank oder Paketfiliale noch Punkte in die Fläche hinzufüge.
Andreas
Am 03.07.2014 21:56, schrieb Johannes:
Auf
Danke Dir! So hab ich's auch gemappt. Ich meinte, wie tagge ich die
Paketannahmestelle? Gruß Johannes
Am 03.07.2014 22:09, schrieb Andreas Neumann:
Ich habe es meist so gelöst, dass ich das Ladengeschäft als Fläche
gemappt habe, in den ich einen Punkt mit der Paketannahmestelle gelegt habe.
Hä!
ich war zwei Minuten schneller ;-)
Am 03.07.2014 22:09, schrieb Andreas Neumann:
Ich habe es meist so gelöst, dass ich das Ladengeschäft als Fläche
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: [Talk-de] Hermes Paketannahmestelle/Paketshop
Datum: Thu Jul 03 2014 22:14:40 GMT+0200
Von: Johannes jotpe@gmail.com
An: Openstreetmap allgemeines in Deutsch talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Danke Dir! So hab ich's auch gemappt. Ich meinte, wie
Mir ist das grade bei den Tesla Ladestationen aufgefallen: Sollte man
die Stationen wo schon ein Kabel dran ist nicht eher mit plug: taggen?
Bzw./Oder eventuell auch angeben, dass ein Kabel vorhanden ist?
Habe das hier als Beispiel in Deutschland gefunden:
Am 03/lug/2014 um 22:07 schrieb Bernhard Weiskopf bweisk...@gmx.de:
Freilich braucht eine aufwändigere Auswertung mehr Zeit, das dürfte heute
aber kein besonderes Problem mehr sein.
doch, das ist immer dann ein Problem, wenn man quasi-live Daten verwenden will
Gruß,
Martin
Am 03/lug/2014 um 22:14 schrieb Johannes jotpe@gmail.com:
. Ich meinte, wie tagge ich die
Paketannahmestelle?
Vielleicht brauchen wir da noch einen neuen Tag dafür, post_office trifft es
m.E. nicht, weil ein solches mehr Services haben sollte (z.B. auch Briefe), das
Wiki sieht das
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dpost_office
Ich finde es seltsam, dass der dort verwendete Begriff Poststelle ist,
üblicher (und genauer) wäre Postamt oder evtl. auch nur Post. Poststelle
ist entweder ein Sub-Postamt auf dem Land oder eine entspr. Abteilung in
Behörden und
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: [Talk-de] post_office im deutschen Wiki
Datum: Fri Jul 04 2014 00:09:22 GMT+0200
Von: Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
An: Openstreetmap allgemeines in Deutsch talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Kann man auch als Spezialform von amenity=post_office betrachten. Da es
schon
post_office:type=bureau
post_office:type=post_annex
post_office:type=post_partner
gibt, könte man sowas mit
post_office:type=parcels_only
doch beschreiben, oder?
Gruß Johannes
Am 04.07.2014 00:00, schrieb Martin
Hi,
Which tag do I need to use for mapping wedding hall or kalyan mantaps. I
couldn't find one here http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features. There
are some more Indian relevant POIs for which there are no presets in osm.
thanks,
--
Srividya C
Valerio wrote
Quando faccio il download della zona usando JOSM, appiono per una frazione
di secondo poi spariscono.
Forse hai attivo in JOSM qualche filtro, in tal caso dovrebbe apparirti un
warning in alto a destra.
-
--
cascafico.altervista.org
twitter.com/cascafico
--
View this
Il 01/07/2014 21:19, Marco Predicatori ha scritto:
Ciao,
mi sono cimentato in questa relazione:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3862172
Ottimo. Potresti aggiungerla nell'apposita tabella sul wiki [1]?
Ho cercato di seguire le istruzioni sparse nella wiki, e a
scopiazzare altre
Ecco le foto del tratto di highway=track per il quale chiedo qual'é il tag
surface più adatto:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5810149/IMG_0574.jpg
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5810149/IMG_0575.jpg
Grazie, ciao
--enrico
--
View this message in context:
surface=rock
?
2014-07-03 11:58 GMT+02:00 demon.box e.rossin...@alice.it:
Ecco le foto del tratto di highway=track per il quale chiedo qual'é il tag
surface più adatto:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5810149/IMG_0574.jpg
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5810149/IMG_0575.jpg
Stavo leggendo il wiki alla ricerca di un valore hard rock per il tag
surface ;-) quando mi sono imbattuto nella definizione di unpaved:
A highway feature is predominantly unsealed along its length; i.e., it
has a loose covering ranging from compacted stone chippings to earth.
Unpaved roads may,
Ho un tot di sentieri già correttamente mappati come relazioni: come faccio
ad indicare nei tag della relazione che fanno parte del Parco delle Colline
di Brescia?
Aggiungo questo?
description:it=Sentiero del Parco delle Colline di Brescia
può andare oppure c'è un tag più specifico?
Il 03 luglio 2014 13:30, demon.box ha scritto:
Ho un tot di sentieri già correttamente mappati come relazioni: come faccio
ad indicare nei tag della relazione che fanno parte del Parco delle Colline
di Brescia?
per quale motivo lo vuoi indicare?
Per dire chi è il responsabile della
2014-07-03 13:46 GMT+02:00 Daniele Forsi dfo...@gmail.com:
Per dire chi è il responsabile della manutenzione si usa il tag
operator,
+1, userei
operator= nome del ente che gestisce il parco
Se fossero relazioni del trasporto pubblico si userebbe il tag network
per creare un insieme, ma per
2014-07-03 13:00 GMT+02:00 emmexx emm...@tiscalinet.it:
Unpaved roads may, in aerial imagery, show evidence of water along their
course; in such circumstances, the waterway should not be tagged as a
stream, though it might appear as such. This value gives only a rough
description; use a more
2014-07-03 11:58 GMT+02:00 demon.box e.rossin...@alice.it:
Ecco le foto del tratto di highway=track per il quale chiedo qual'é il tag
surface più adatto:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5810149/IMG_0574.jpg
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5810149/IMG_0575.jpg
Grazie, ciao
sì come larghezza ci passa tranquillamente un trattore anche se negli ultimi
anni passano solo mezzi a 2 ruote o 2 gambe!
a guardare quelle rocce così levigate sembra quasi quel che resta di
un'antica pavimentazione oppure è solo un caso perché il tratto è breve.
--
View this message in
sì hai perfettamente ragione, il problema è che non sono ancora riuscito a
mappare i confini del parco... ma nel frattempo mi piaceva dare
un'indicazione (=informazione) che quel sentiero è inserito all'interno di
quel parco.
grazie, ciao
--
View this message in context:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:00 PM, emmexx emm...@tiscalinet.it wrote:
Stavo leggendo il wiki alla ricerca di un valore hard rock per il tag
surface ;-) quando mi sono imbattuto nella definizione di unpaved:
A highway feature is predominantly unsealed along its length; i.e., it
has a loose
Esatto è propio un problema di filtri. Avevo attivato un filtro per
nascondere gli oggetti con note, che io normalmente metto su dei singoli
nodi, in questa zona invece ci sono delle note su delle way e quindi mi
venivano nascosti molti piu dati.
Grazie per l'aiuto
Valerio
--
View this
Matthijs,
Not sure if it was just you and I mapping tonight? hopefully there will be
others at the pub to join you. Unfortunately I now can’t stay late so I plan to
do a little mapping as planned but will not now make it to the pub afterwards
unfortunately.
Cheers
Andy
From: Rob
På Facebook dök det upp en länk till Malmös statistikatlas.
http://xyz.malmo.se/mkarta/statistikkarta/index.htm
Jag kommenterade. Är det någon här som har kommentarer till mina kommentarer?
Mycket positivt!
(Förlåt att jag nu kapar ditt inlägg, men det här är något jag brinner för.)
Jag
Hola a todos,
Como en teoría ha comenzado el verano creo que es la ocasión propicia para
añadir fuentes de agua potable en OSM.
Por ello hemos lanzado una nueva campaña:
http://www.openstreetmap.es/2014/07/03/anade-una-fuente/
Aparte que la diéseis a conocer en redes sociales estaría bien
El jueves día 03 de julio de 2014, a las 19:18:47 +0200,
Óscar Zorrilla Alonso escribió:
Hola a todos,
Como en teoría ha comenzado el verano creo que es la ocasión propicia para
añadir fuentes de agua potable en OSM.
Por ello hemos lanzado una nueva campaña:
Buscando imágenes de fuentes con la que ilustrar la campaña he dado con esta
web (1) donde han geolocalizado muchas fuentes y hablan sobre su estado de
conservación. Tal y como afirmas hay muchísimas fuentes inutilizadas.
Respecto al caso de Madrid, me he quedado un poco pillado, en Burgos
Con respecto a Madrid he enviado una petición al portal de datos abiertos (
http://datos.madrid.es/portal/site/egob/menuitem.5d58c2c8f052ba3cee23ee2384f1a5a0/?vgnextoid=e7a412b9ace9f310VgnVCM10171f5a0aRCRD
). A ver si lo tienen en cuenta y publican algo.
El 3 de julio de 2014, 21:18, Óscar
Claro Rui. Já mandei um e-mail para um dos organizadores do Tasking Manager
e aguardo resposta.
No dia 3 de Julho de 2014 às 15:09, Rui Oliveira racoqs...@gmail.com
escreveu:
Marcos quando tiveres isso organizado ou tiveres mais alguma dúvida diz,
acho o esforço e a ideia de criar o grupo
O Tasking Manager é o mais conhecido porque criado para as necessidades de HOT,
só mencionei o mapcraft porque parece-me interessante (tem funcionalidade de
tchat) más nunca experimentei usa-lo.
Queria acrescentar no caso de catalogação, faço sempre a comparação :
- a estrada tem a largura de
Hello,
The GIS department at the County of Grey, Ontario was interested in updating
the street centerline data with our Grey County Road Data, which we believe is
more precise, both in terms of centerline placement and road labelling.
I was thinking of using the JOSM Editor utility to bulk
Bonjour Soham,
IMHO, importing a street network to improve the accuracy of an area that is
already covered is not a good idea and could be considered as vandalism -
mainly because it means deleting what have been done by previous
contributors. However, if you have the time to compare both
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Shah,Soham soham.s...@grey.ca wrote:
I was thinking of using the JOSM Editor utility to bulk import the data. I
read on the ‘Import process guidelines’ wiki that street centerlines can be
very difficult to import. So, I am looking for some guidance and opinions
C'est moi qui ai réservé le stand pour les RMLL, mais je n'y serrais pas.
Message original
Sujet: Montage des stands aux journées grand public
Date : Thu, 03 Jul 2014 08:55:02 +0200
De : Eric Niort obrown...@gmail.com
Organisation : Frul
Pour : eric.ni...@frul.org
Mesdames,
Qui y sera alors ?
J'y vais à minima pour Lundi, pour 2 conf. Je peux descendre avant avec les
kakemonos.
Le 3 juillet 2014 10:32, Frédéric Rodrigo fred.rodr...@gmail.com a écrit :
C'est moi qui ai réservé le stand pour les RMLL, mais je n'y serrais pas.
Message original
Le 03/07/2014 10:32, Frédéric Rodrigo a écrit :
C'est moi qui ai réservé le stand pour les RMLL, mais je n'y serrais pas.
Moi j'y serais, mais j'ai pas encore prévu mon hébergement.
Lorsque je suis allé sur le site des RMLL les réservations de chambres
CROUS n'étais pas encore ouverte.
Bonjour,
une route qui est signalée sur le fond cadastral comme portant un nom, donc
le tag name peut être renseigné, mais qui est aussi le tracé d'une ancienne
voie romaine, quel tag peut on utiliser pour apporter cette dernière
information sur l'objet ?
Michel
Bonjour,
Je serai sur le stand et à la carto-partie samedi et je peux amener des
posters et les tie-shirts qu'il me restent du dernier SOTM-FR. Par
ailleurs j'en profiterai Christophe pour te donner le chèque des trucs
que j'ai vendu au niveau du groupe local OSM hérault.
Par contre je n'ai
Le 03/07/2014 12:37, Nicolas Moyroud a écrit :
Bonjour,
Je serai sur le stand et à la carto-partie samedi et je peux amener des
posters et les tie-shirts qu'il me restent du dernier SOTM-FR. Par
ailleurs j'en profiterai Christophe pour te donner le chèque des trucs
que j'ai vendu au niveau
Salut à tous,
Je cherche à produire une liste d'arguments clés autour des restrictions
imposées par la licence de GoogleMaps, afin de souligner les avantages
d'une licence ouverte telle qu'ODbL. Quelqu'un aurait-il un lien à proposer
vers de telles informations ? Ces questions reviennent souvent
Bonjour,
quelque chose qui n'est pas visible dans la licence, mais qui découle
directement du modèle économique : la publicité ciblée
ie : la brasserie du coin de la rue n'apparait pas sur la carte google
parce qu'une autre brasserie un peu plus loin a acheté un espace pub ... ex
sur
Excellent merci pour cet exemple :) d'autres apports ?
Augustin
Le 3 juillet 2014 16:43, Sylvain Maillard sylvain.maill...@gmail.com a
écrit :
Bonjour,
quelque chose qui n'est pas visible dans la licence, mais qui découle
directement du modèle économique : la publicité ciblée
ie : la
Bonsoir à tous,
Je tenais à partager avec vous le lancement sur le wiki du RFC sur une
proposition concernant les équipements contrôlés à distance.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Remotely_controlled_devices
Tel qu'expliqué dans le document, le but est de décrire le moyen à
Les conditions d'utilisation en français parlent d'elles même:
https://www.google.com/intl/fr_ALL/help/terms_maps.html
*2. Restrictions d'utilisation*. Sauf dans le cas où vous avez reçu une
autorisation écrite préalable de Google (ou, le cas échéant, du fournisseur
d'un Contenu spécifique),
2014-07-03 17:44 GMT+02:00 Christian Quest cqu...@openstreetmap.fr:
En gros, on n'a pas le droit de faire grand chose... et dans le reste des
conditions on peut aussi voir que Google peut les modifier comme bon lui
semble.
Oui bon, il faut aussi faire attention. Ces contrats sont aussi plein
Bonjour,
Pour taguer une rue réservée aux bus (ou une voie séparée physiquement
de la circulation générale) j'utilise depuis longtemps la combinaison de
tags suivante : access=no, psv=yes en plus de highway=service (exemple :
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5982963). C'est clairement
Bonjour,
Pour moi, si la rue/la voie est uniquement réservée aux bus, access=no
est nécessaire (et ensuite, on met tous loes véhicules autorisés, à yes :
bus, Mais vélos ? Taxis ?). Le supprimer signifierait que tout le monde a
le droit d'y rouler, mais que c'est particulièrement fait pour les bus
Bonjour
Le 03/07/2014 18:22, Rene Chalon a écrit :
D'après vous quelle est la/les bonne(s) combinaison(s) de tags pour ces
rues réservées aux bus et la/lesquelle(s) est/sont à exclure ?
Implicitement un highway=* est access=yes.
Si pvs=designated est seul, cela ne veut pas dire que le reste
Bonjour
Le 03/07/2014 18:47, David Crochet a écrit :
Implicitement un highway=* est access=yes.
Heu, pas forcément implicitement puisqu'en fonction de la valeur de la
clé highway=*, des contraintes explicites existent (bicycle sur
motorway, etc.)
Cordialement
--
David Crochet
Comme les autres, si tu mets un psv=designated, ça ne dit rien des
autres modes de transport. C'est encore plus gênant dans un tunnel
comme dans l'exemple cité. Donc il faut le remettre là où il a été
supprimé.
Mais attention, mettre un access=no sur une voie réservée
(highway=service) ou une rue
J'y serai aussi avec Olivier Griffet car nous avons un stand Gullivar ,
Nous affficherons quelques photos et portables avec JOSM. Nous arrivons sur
les coups de 7h00.
Le 3 juil. 2014 14:01, Christophe Merlet red...@redfoxcenter.org a
écrit :
Le 03/07/2014 12:37, Nicolas Moyroud a écrit :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:waterway
を見たのですが、水門 に該当するものはないみたいです。
検索しても
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:seamark:type%3Dgate
くらいしか見当たりませんでした。
適切なタグは何がいいでしょうか。
ribbon
___
Talk-ja mailing list
Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org
三浦です。
家の近所の水門は、
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249166942
waterway=lock_gate
でタグ付されています。
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/waterway=lock_gate
taginfoでも多数使われていますね。
On 2014年07月04日 07:52, ribbon wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:waterway
を見たのですが、水門 に該当するものはないみたいです。
検索しても
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 08:40:10AM +0900, Hiroshi Miura(@osmf) wrote:
三浦です。
家の近所の水門は、
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249166942
waterway=lock_gate
でタグ付されています。
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/waterway=lock_gate
taginfoでも多数使われていますね。
でも lock_gateは
いいだです。
英語だとsluiceというらしくて、Taginfoでみると少し入力があるようなのですが
ちゃんとした定義はないかもですね。
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=sluice#values
Proposed Pageはこのへん。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/sluice_gate
水門の部分に
waterway=flow_control
flow_control=sluice_gate
水流の開放点（？）には
Hi all,
Just joined the mailing list.
I've been editing small bits of data here and there for a while, although I'm
still a newbie at this. I work for traveline south east anglia and, along
with colleagues in some other traveline regions, we have just adopted OSM as
our base mapping layer. I
Marvellous Stuart! Glad to have you aboard.
Richard Symonds
Wikimedia UK
0207 065 0992
Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered
Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street,
Hi,
I have been talking to the Highways Agency who are keen to get more recent
changes on OSM. They want to get all the new roads added and therefore added to
the routers.
(the initial contact was http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=25553
if you want a little background)
Things
On 3 July 2014 17:51, John Baker rovas...@hotmail.com wrote:
He just said we release the plans and
they are public domain.
Public Domain (British English, especially Government and in the
Courts): Information known by the public, could be under any kind of
copyright
Public Domain (US
On 03/07/14 17:51, John Baker wrote:
The first thing I am worried about is the copyright of the various
plans. Some/many seem to be derived from OS maps.
A legitimate concern.
Now I am no expert on the copyright situation here and dialogue is
difficult they know little about OSM really. He
Yeah I know he probably didn't understand the implications/view points on it. I
should have explained that better, rather than just ...
Anyway he was talking about open source, etc and he meant it in the (modern)
open source style of public domain.
But the point was I didn't believe him that we
Welcome onboard.
Gianfra
On 3 July 2014 17:11, Richard Symonds richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk
wrote:
Marvellous Stuart! Glad to have you aboard.
Richard Symonds
Wikimedia UK
0207 065 0992
Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
Wales, Registered No.
Yeah I know we are pretty good at adding them. But this discussion started with
the HA because there were roads that were not on OSM.
It was this project that he was working on.
http://www.highways.gov.uk/roads/road-projects/a23-handcross-to-warninglid/
So I personally added this in a rough
You know, rather than thinking about automatically importing any of
their data into OSM, my intuition is that given the concerns about OS
copyright, plus how much OSMers enjoy mapping new features, I'd
suggest using their data to create a web feed of Hot new roads for
mappers to go and survey! - I
Maybe a simple method is to use the OSM notes system, which is what the feature
was designed for?
Shaun
On 3 Jul 2014, at 19:10, Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com wrote:
You know, rather than thinking about automatically importing any of
their data into OSM, my intuition is that given the
I am a little surprised at the negativity. I would have thought it would be
welcomed that the highway agency want to engage with OSM to help get the most
up-to-date map available. I thought we prided ourselves of having the most
up-to-date map.
We currently have roads under construction
OK sorry, I shouldn't have said automatically importing, that was a
misrepresentation. But I didn't intend negativity, I thought I was
offering a positive suggestion of how to work with their data! Yes of
course the news in your email was great to see, it would definitely be
lovely to have their
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
For tracks, tracktype indicates condition, and tracktype1 should be
drivable by any family sedan as it may even be paved.
This.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Just trying to process this: wouldn't a tracktype 1 be tagged as
unclassified or residential anyway? Or to ask a different way, assuming
that roads with houses should be tagged as residential, when should one tag
a sub-tertiary road as track vs. using unclassified?
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:21
2014-07-03 17:36 GMT+02:00 Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com:
Just trying to process this: wouldn't a tracktype 1 be tagged as
unclassified or residential anyway? Or to ask a different way, assuming
that roads with houses should be tagged as residential, when should one tag
a
Highway=service implies a private road, though; if a public road dead-ends
at a single building or facility, it should be =residential or
=unclassified, right?
The tracktype= key is also not really applicable to many of the
unmaintained roads around here, at least as described on the wiki. The
I think highway=service could be public or private, just a matter of if it
is used to access a certain building / facility like Martin said. Some
public examples could be road to a public parking lot, driveway in/out of
fire station, road leading to a public works facility.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014
2014-07-03 18:26 GMT+02:00 Kevin Broderick k...@kevinbroderick.com:
Highway=service implies a private road, though;
AFAIK only some service like service=driveway are generally private=yes,
while parking _aisle, alley or generic service might be public roads.
cheers,
Martin
Not necessarily. The case I tend to run into, these are extremely rural
roads suitable only as a last resort (or for recreational rat runs across
The Big Empty) and tend to be prone to irregular maintenance, unevenly
graded, do not have snow removal, may have fords, variable in width and
tend to
I rebooted the caching server but it looks like the USGS server is having a
real hard time. I will look in more detail later.
On Jul 2, 2014 10:33 PM, Chris Lawrence lordsu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
If it helps, OSM-US hosts a tile
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Kevin Broderick k...@kevinbroderick.com
wrote:
Highway=service implies a private road, though;
Not always, service=alley can be public, can't they?
--
Martijn van Exel
http://oegeo.wordpress.com/
http://openstreetmap.us/
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Jason Remillard
remillard.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Playing around with scout, I have discovered that it will not route
over tracks, cycleways, and paths unless you are in pedestrian mode.
It ignores access=destination, and the surface tag.
Scout does not route
On 7/3/14 2:32 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Kevin Broderick k...@kevinbroderick.com
wrote:
Highway=service implies a private road, though;
Not always, service=alley can be public, can't they?
i'd say that most alleys i see are public. for obvious reasons they
1 - 100 di 111 matches
Mail list logo
