Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Démo Carnet de rando sur la crête des Vosges
Le 21 avr. 2015 à 21:59, JB jb...@mailoo.org a écrit : Si tu as des envies, il suffit de faire ou de demander ! J’ai commencé un itinéraire avec GraphHoper (et rajouté les morceaux de chemin manquants). Comment fonctionne CarnetRando ? Pré-requis : PC sous windows ça semble fonctionner sous MacOS ou Linux : quelqu’un utilise l’un de ces environnement ? Python Maperitive http://maperitive.net/ Java + osmosis http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osmosis/Installation Modèle Numérique de Terrain (SRTMV3R3) : Faut-il le télécharger manuellement ou Maperitive s’en charge ? Editer data_cadres.txt pour les zones qui nous intéressent Lancer à la main import_cadres.py pour générer cadres.csv Personnaliser les règles de rendu ? (J’aimerais que l’itinéraire apparaisse sur mes cartes) Editer cree_cartes.py pour qu’il télécharge les fichiers .pbf de notre zone (données OSM à jour) Merci d’avance, — Yves___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [Talk-it] natural=spring oppure amenity=drinking_water ?
Daniele Forsi-2 wrote per come nascono le etichette in OSM e per come si inseriscono, a livello di dati non esistono valori predefiniti perché non puoi sapere se il mappatore si è dimenticato di inserirlo ... ok, grazie, ho capito che in OSM la ridondanza non è un problema, anzi. dieterdreist wrote lo stesso discorso vale anche per una fontanella, potrebbe esser stata inquinata. beh, per la scelta tra drinking_water=yes oppure =conditional ne farei una questione di probabilità... In effetti forse possiamo distinguere tra sorgenti naturali imbrigliate oppure no: nelle considerazioni che ho fatto prima avevo in mente sorgenti naturali non imbrigliate, tipo queste: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5843367/sorgenti1.jpg Se sono imbrigliate (vedi sotto), allora trovo ragionevole usare drinking_water=yes http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5843367/sorgenti2.jpg -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/natural-spring-oppure-amenity-drinking-water-tp5843222p5843367.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-at] Details zu Modified Nodes herausfinden
Ein Großteil dieser Modifikationen dürfte in folgendem Changeset passiert sein: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30778709 2015-05-05 11:02 GMT+02:00 Florian Michaeler flor...@michaeler.at: Hallo, ich war heute eher zufällig auf der OSMstats Seite ( http://osmstats.neis-one.org/?item=countriescountry=Austria# ), dabei ist mir aufgefallen, dass am 04.05. in Österreich 34539 Nodes geändert wurden. Da ich ja prinzipiell neugierig bin und die Anzahl so weit über den üblichen 5000 - 6000 Änderungen pro Tag ist. Stellt sich mir die Frage, wie man hierzu nähere Details herausfinden könnte? lg Florian aka Miflo --- Diese E-Mail ist frei von Viren und Malware, denn der avast! Antivirus Schutz ist aktiv. http://www.avast.com ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] What extra permissions are needed to include CC-BY data in OSM
Just found http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/GettingPermission it has hints about what extra permissions we require. On 5 May 2015 at 19:27, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote: I'm bringing up a conversation from talk-au pertaining to what additional permissions we need from content owners in order to include or use as a source to derive further information from their CC-BY licensed data in OSM. Any advice is very much appreciated. On 16 April 2015 at 15:26, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote: On 4/15/2015 6:01 AM, Ross wrote: The issue is not with the licence. The current terms and conditions require permission to add data not owned by the contributor. This is incorrect. An appropriate license is sufficient. Some obviously appropriate licenses are CC0, PDDL, ODC-BY and the ODbL itself. The issue is that CC BY (and BY-SA) 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 require a form of attribution that is not practical for most map uses, so we need permission. This would have been true even without the license change, as we were never meeting the requirements of those versions of CC BY. We have permission for many Australian sources, and I believe for all CC BY Australian sources that were in use at the time of the license change. My question was does CC-BY 4.0 have the same issue? Could CC-BY 4.0 data be included in OSM. Secondly, what specific permission do we need to include CC-BY 3.0 or 4.0 data in OSM? Do we essentially need the data supplier to agree to CC0 plus attribution in some specific form requested by OSMF? Is there a sample legal agreement or text for this? The release of government spatial data in Australia is continuing to expand to more and more agencies who are releasing under CC-BY, and it would be great if we had an OSMF approved license agreement or such we can present to these agencies so that hopefully these CC-BY datasets can be potentially used in some form in OSM. ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [Talk-dk] Strømningsretningen stemmer ikke!
Som vi vist tidligere i denne tråd har været inde på er der masser af eksempler på at folk har tegnet vandløb uden at bekymre sig stort om hverken retning eller klassificering eller præcision. Ligeså med vejnettet. I begyndelsen var det ofte også bare med at få nogen veje på kortet uden nødvendigvis at bekymre sig om klassificering mm. Før vi fik adgang til luftfotos kunne det også ofte være en udfordring at tolke vores gps spor (som det stadig kan ses i mange skovområder). Jeg har rettet en del vandløb, men mit primære fokus har indtil videre været finpudsning af det danske vejnet (hvilket der altså mange steder har været hårdt brug for). Richard Fairhurst udtalte i formiddags på IRC: OSM is iterative... we don't expect everything to be 100% right to start with Og det kan han jo have ret i. Så god fornøjelse derude. Tirsdag den 5. maj 2015 10:33:30 skrev Allan Gyldendal Frederiksen: Det er så ikke en angivelse man skal regne for sandheden http://opentopomap.org/#map=14/56.36822/10.43452 , her kan der ses et vandløb, hvor vandet strømmer i begge retninger. Det kunne se ud til, at det er GeoDanmark datasættet der bruges, for det er samme fejl som findes i det. Venlig hilsen Allan Gyldendal Frederiksen GIS-koordinator Syddjurs Kommune, Digitalisering Direkte +4587535261 Mobil +4530924749 a...@syddjurs.dk Fra: Michael Andersen [mailto:hj...@milvus.dk] Sendt: 5. maj 2015 12:04 Til: OpenStreetMap Denmark Emne: Re: [Talk-dk] Strømningsretningen stemmer ikke! Jeg faldt lige over OpenTopoMaphttp://opentopomap.org/#map=15/55.81134/12.25259 hvor der vitterligt er pile der angiver strømmens retning i vandløb. God fornøjelse. Tirsdag den 17. marts 2015 00:18:07 skrev Michael Andersen: Åh, ok. Det har du ret i. Jeg spurgte lige på IRC og der er tilsyneladende ikke nogen normale OSM baserede kort der angiver hvilken retning vandløb strømmer. Så enten må enten må man gætte sig til det eller skabe sit eget kort. Mandag den 16. marts 2015 23:48:04 skrev Uffe Kousgaard: Hej, Jeg taler om at vandet på den strækning løber mod nord ude i virkeligheden. Det var den information Niels Elgaard søgte. Og jeg ved godt, at liniestykker har en digitaliseringsretning. Men retningen fremgår ikke af det normale OSM kort. hilsen Uffe Michael Andersen wrote: Hej Uffe Nej, alle liniestykker i databasen har en retning og vandløb strømmer blot i samme retning som liniestykket. Mandag den 16. marts 2015 23:22:34 skrev Uffe Kousgaard: Det løber nordpå, på den strækning. Skal man sætte oneway før retningen kan ses på kortet? mvh Uffe Kousgaard Niels Elgaard Larsen wrote: Men der er stadig vandløb, som jeg ikke har fundet ud af, fx Tokkerup Å: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32057465 ___ Talk-dk mailing list Talk-dk@openstreetmap.orgmailto:Talk-dk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-dk ___ Talk-dk mailing list Talk-dk@openstreetmap.orgmailto:Talk-dk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-dk ___ Talk-dk mailing list Talk-dk@openstreetmap.orgmailto:Talk-dk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-dk ___ Talk-dk mailing list Talk-dk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-dk
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Démo Carnet de rando sur la crête des Vosges
J’ai oublié un pré-requis de taille : les règles de rendu R25 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/R25_Maperitive_style de JB ;-) Concernant la création du pdf final, tu le fais actuellement à la main avec un traitement de texte ? — Yves Comment fonctionne CarnetRando ? Pré-requis : PC sous windows ça semble fonctionner sous MacOS ou Linux : quelqu’un utilise l’un de ces environnement ? Python Maperitive http://maperitive.net/ Java + osmosis http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osmosis/Installation Modèle Numérique de Terrain (SRTMV3R3) : Faut-il le télécharger manuellement ou Maperitive s’en charge ? ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [Talk-lv] Rīgas adrešu punktu imports no opendata.riga.lv
Sveiki! On Tue, 05 May 2015 13:16:39 +0300, Rich ric...@nakts.net wrote: * Importa problēmas un to pievadātais risinājums 2) Dažreiz ielas nosaukums opendata.riga.lv nesakrīt ar ielas nosaukumu OSM. Visvairāk tas ir pamanīts visādām numurētām līnijām. Tā, opendata.riga.lv līnijas ir rakstītas kā Čiekurkalna 1.līnija, bet OSM vēsturiski vai citu apsvērumu dēļ ir pieņemts rakstīt ar atstarpi pēc punkta: Čiekurkalna 1. līnija. Apstrādājot datus otrām importam tas tika ņemts vērā un visas numurētas ielas bija attiecīgi konvertētas, lai būtu atstarpe pēc punktā, kā tas ir pieņemts (?) Latvijas OSM kopienā. atstarpe pēc punkta ir gramatiski pareizi - kārtas skaitlis ir tāds pats teikuma loceklis kā citi un tie tiek atdalīti ar atstarpēm. rīgas datu veidotāji šo lietu datos ieviesuši kļūdaini :) Arī ielas nosaukumu plāksnēs redzēju, ka ļoti bieži ir rakstīts Čiekurkalna 1.līnija (un citām ielām) bez atstarpes. Bet lai tas paliek uz viņu sirdsapziņas. 2a) Pēc otrā neveiksmīga importa atklājas, ka dažviet OSM ielas nosaukumi ir rakstīti ar kļūdu (galvenokārt gramatiskas kļūdas), bet tos būs iespējams izmainīt pēc importa apskatot atklātos validatoros, kur jauniem adrešu punktiem neatbilst esošie ielas nosaukumi. Pie reizes arī būs redzams, kuras ielas nosaukumi nav OSM Rīgas kartē, un kur ir nepieciešama apsekošana un ielu nosaukumu precizēšana. vai piedāvātais risinājums ir importēt šādus datus un pēc tam labot jau pašā OSM ? Pagaidām jā. Bet principā, man rādījās ideja: mēģināšu iegūt visu OSM esošo Rīgas ielu nosaukumus un salīdzināt ar opendata adrešu datu kopu. Pagaidām nezinu cik ilgu laiku tas aizņems sagatavot šos datus, bet būs iespējams apskatīt iespējamas kļūdas uzreiz. 3) Dažreiz OSM (arī mājas numura plāksnītes) adreses pieraksts varētu atšķirties no opendata.riga.lv pierakstiem. Piemēram 70 k-6 un 70/6. Tādu adrešu punktu ir pietiekami maz, bet tomēr ir. Kā atrisināt šo vai opendata visur ir vienāds pieraksts ? Apskatot opendata katalogu redzēju, ka pastāv tikai daži varianti (kur 9 - numurs, B - burts, 11 - blakus numurs): - 9 - 9B - 9 k-9 (vai 9k-9, tie ir dažādie ar atstarpēm un bēz, bet es to ievēroju) - 9/11 un daži eksotiskie, kā 9B k-9, vai 9BC u.tml. Tātad ar / katalogā numurs ir atdalīts, tikai ja mājas numurs sastāv no diviem blakus numuriem, nevis korpusa numurs. Bet vairākās vietās Rīgā redzēju, ka uz numuru plāksnēm rakstā korpusus kā 9/1, nevis 9 k-1. Varbūt tas ir vēsturiski, bet tas arī tika ievadīts OSM. pagaidām izklausās ļoti labi. pāris lietas, kas vēl trūka iepriekšējos mēģinājumos : * reģistrēšana importu sarakstā * atsevišķs lietotāja konts Ok, šo uztaisīsim ar laiku. Sākumā jāuzgaida apspriešanas lēmumu. Kādas vēl problēmas vārētu būt ar importu, no tiem kas vel nav apskatītas? Kādi būtu OSM Latvijas kopienas lietotāju ieteikumi, padomi un rekomendācijas importa uzlabošanai? vēlreiz liels paldies par šī procesa virzīšanu. man šķiet, ka šie dati nopietni uzlabos kartes kvalitāti rīgā un imports (kvalitatīvi) jāveic. Ar cieņu, Vitālijs ___ Talk-lv mailing list Talk-lv@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv
Re: [Talk-lv] Rīgas adrešu punktu imports no opendata.riga.lv
On 05.05.2015. 15:07, Vitaly Bolshakov wrote: Sveiki! On Tue, 05 May 2015 13:16:39 +0300, Rich ric...@nakts.net wrote: * Importa problēmas un to pievadātais risinājums 2) Dažreiz ielas nosaukums opendata.riga.lv nesakrīt ar ielas nosaukumu OSM. Visvairāk tas ir pamanīts visādām numurētām līnijām. Tā, opendata.riga.lv līnijas ir rakstītas kā Čiekurkalna 1.līnija, bet OSM vēsturiski vai citu apsvērumu dēļ ir pieņemts rakstīt ar atstarpi pēc punkta: Čiekurkalna 1. līnija. Apstrādājot datus otrām importam tas tika ņemts vērā un visas numurētas ielas bija attiecīgi konvertētas, lai būtu atstarpe pēc punktā, kā tas ir pieņemts (?) Latvijas OSM kopienā. atstarpe pēc punkta ir gramatiski pareizi - kārtas skaitlis ir tāds pats teikuma loceklis kā citi un tie tiek atdalīti ar atstarpēm. rīgas datu veidotāji šo lietu datos ieviesuši kļūdaini :) Arī ielas nosaukumu plāksnēs redzēju, ka ļoti bieži ir rakstīts Čiekurkalna 1.līnija (un citām ielām) bez atstarpes. Bet lai tas paliek uz viņu sirdsapziņas. :) Man vienmēr licies, ka nelikt atstarpi aiz punkta aiz skaitļa latviešu valodā ir iegājies teksta redaktoros ieviestās angliskās auto-pareizrakstības dēļ, kas nākamajam vārdam aiz atstarpes aiz punkta automātiski pārvērš pirmo burtu par lielo. Un cilvēki nemāk konfigurēt teksta redaktorus (vai pārprot to ieteikumus), bet atklāj, ka lielais burts neparādās, ja pēc punkta atstarpi neieliek. Un tā tas pamazām izplatījies, ka viena daļa to droši vien jau uzskata par pareizo variantu. Jānis ___ Talk-lv mailing list Talk-lv@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv
Re: [Talk-lv] Rīgas adrešu punktu imports no opendata.riga.lv
Ahā, nu man skaidrs, kāpēc vienubrīd parādījās dubultnumuri, kā arī numuri zemes pleķīšiem, uz kuriem nekas nav uzbūvēts, kā jau tu rakstīji. Un kaut kādos /zoom /līmeņos joprojām tie gļuki ir, bet tas laikam laika jautājums, līdz atkal pazudīs. Ā, pat nav pilnībā dubulti, te bija gadījums ar atstarpi: blakus jau esošam numuram 60 k-1 parādījās otrs — 60k-1. Adrese neapbūvētam zemesgabalam laikam nav nepareizi? Ja vien (pasta?) adreses ar ielām un numuriem nav tikai ēkām, tad droši vien tas tiešām ir ieguvums, lai arī jocīgi izskatās. :) Tikai lai kartē neparādās, ka tur ir ēka, ja tur (vairs) tādas nav, bet tikai kā adrese zemei. Jānis On 05.05.2015. 13:16, Rich wrote: On 05/05/15 12:51, Vitaly Bolshakov wrote: Sveiki, Latvijas OpenStreetMap kopiena! Vēlētos uzsākt atklātu diskusiju par lielo Rīgas adrešu punktu importu no opendata.riga.lv datiem. sākumā - liels paldies :) ... * Importa problēmas un to pievadātais risinājums 1) Lielais datu pārklājums (~15/37). Problēma bija noteikta pirmā neveiksmīga importā. Dublējošie dati būtiski pasliktinās OSM datu lietojamību un nav pieļaujami. Lai to atrisinātu es izguvu visas OSM esošas Rīgas adreses (adrešu punktus OSM punktiem, un adreses ēkām (building=*) OSM līnijām un relacijām). Pēc tām, no opendata.riga.lv datu kopas bija izņemtas visas adreses, kas jau ir OSM, un tika iegūta rezultējoša kopa ar ~22 tukst. adrešu punktiem, kas vēl nav OSM, vai kuriem OSM adrese atšķiras no opendata.riga.lv. 2) Dažreiz ielas nosaukums opendata.riga.lv nesakrīt ar ielas nosaukumu OSM. Visvairāk tas ir pamanīts visādām numurētām līnijām. Tā, opendata.riga.lv līnijas ir rakstītas kā Čiekurkalna 1.līnija, bet OSM vēsturiski vai citu apsvērumu dēļ ir pieņemts rakstīt ar atstarpi pēc punkta: Čiekurkalna 1. līnija. Apstrādājot datus otrām importam tas tika ņemts vērā un visas numurētas ielas bija attiecīgi konvertētas, lai būtu atstarpe pēc punktā, kā tas ir pieņemts (?) Latvijas OSM kopienā. atstarpe pēc punkta ir gramatiski pareizi - kārtas skaitlis ir tāds pats teikuma loceklis kā citi un tie tiek atdalīti ar atstarpēm. rīgas datu veidotāji šo lietu datos ieviesuši kļūdaini :) 2a) Pēc otrā neveiksmīga importa atklājas, ka dažviet OSM ielas nosaukumi ir rakstīti ar kļūdu (galvenokārt gramatiskas kļūdas), bet tos būs iespējams izmainīt pēc importa apskatot atklātos validatoros, kur jauniem adrešu punktiem neatbilst esošie ielas nosaukumi. Pie reizes arī būs redzams, kuras ielas nosaukumi nav OSM Rīgas kartē, un kur ir nepieciešama apsekošana un ielu nosaukumu precizēšana. vai piedāvātais risinājums ir importēt šādus datus un pēc tam labot jau pašā OSM ? 3) Dažreiz OSM (arī mājas numura plāksnītes) adreses pieraksts varētu atšķirties no opendata.riga.lv pierakstiem. Piemēram 70 k-6 un 70/6. Tādu adrešu punktu ir pietiekami maz, bet tomēr ir. Kā atrisināt šo vai opendata visur ir vienāds pieraksts ? kļūdu man pagaidām nav piedāvājumu. Tas arī ir datu divdabība, jo numura plāksnīte atšķīrās no adrešu kataloga datiem, bet principā tam nav jābūt... Pēc importa būs divi adrešu punkti, viens no apsekošanas, otrs no kataloga. jā, šie būs izņēmumi. pēc tam var mēģināt datus apvienot, lai gan vislabākais risinājums būtu informēt rīgas domi - šādai situācijai nevajadzētu būt. piemēŗam, brauc ātrie un nekādi nevar atrast adresi, jo uz mājas ta cits numurs... 4) Ja OSM kartē esošas adreses ir ar kļūdu. Iepriekš veikta datu atlase neļaus izlabot šis kļūdas, jo adreses jau ir OSM, bet nepareizi izvietoti ģeogrāfiski. Jaunie adrešu punkti ar tādām adresēm netiks importētas, un vecas paliks savās vietās. Viena no manām idejām bija analizēt, cik tālu adreses punkts ir no OSM objekta, bet tas būs pietiekami grūti realizējams pie tik lielas datu kopas. Piedāvāju pieņemt, ka tādu objektu ir patiešam ļoti maz, un tas nepasliktinās kopēju datu kvalitāti OSM datubāzē. piekrītu, ka pagaidām šo var ignorēt. ja kāds vēlāķ izanalizētu un atrastu šādus gadījumus, būtu jauki :) 5) Kļūdas opendata.riga.lv datos. Apskatot datus, atrādu kā dažreiz arī opendata.riga.lv ir kļūdas, kad mājas plāksnītes numurs nesakrīt ar kataloga numuru. Šeit varētu būt divi kļūdu veidi. 5a) Uz ēkas ir veca numura plāksnīte, bet kataloga ir pareiza adrese: ir vērts izveidot adreses punktu ar pareizu adresi. 5b) Ir kļūda opendata.riga.lv datos. Diemžēl tādas kļūdas nav iespējams pamanīt un izlabot. Pieņemsim kā tādu kļūdu ir ļoti-ļoti maz, un tie neietekmēs kopēju datu kvalitāti. par jebkuru neatbilstību informējam rīgas domi un skatāmies, kāda ir reakcija. 6) Importa pareiza dokumentēšana un apspriešana. Tā ir būtiska pašreizēja problēma, kuru ir jāatrisina. Būs nepieciešama palīdzība no lietotājiem, kas jau strādāja ar importu vadību. Būs nepieciešama palīdzība no Latvijas OSM kopienas par importa kvalitātes uzlabošanu! pagaidām izklausās ļoti labi. pāris lietas, kas vēl trūka iepriekšējos mēģinājumos : * reģistrēšana importu sarakstā * atsevišķs lietotāja konts * Importa plusi un minusi
Re: [Talk-lv] Rīgas adrešu punktu imports no opendata.riga.lv
On 05/05/15 15:07, Vitaly Bolshakov wrote: ... 2a) Pēc otrā neveiksmīga importa atklājas, ka dažviet OSM ielas nosaukumi ir rakstīti ar kļūdu (galvenokārt gramatiskas kļūdas), bet tos būs iespējams izmainīt pēc importa apskatot atklātos validatoros, kur jauniem adrešu punktiem neatbilst esošie ielas nosaukumi. Pie reizes arī būs redzams, kuras ielas nosaukumi nav OSM Rīgas kartē, un kur ir nepieciešama apsekošana un ielu nosaukumu precizēšana. vai piedāvātais risinājums ir importēt šādus datus un pēc tam labot jau pašā OSM ? Pagaidām jā. Bet principā, man rādījās ideja: mēģināšu iegūt visu OSM esošo Rīgas ielu nosaukumus un salīdzināt ar opendata adrešu datu kopu. Pagaidām nezinu cik ilgu laiku tas aizņems sagatavot šos datus, bet būs iespējams apskatīt iespējamas kļūdas uzreiz. izklausās jauki. vai salīdzinājums būtu tikai ar pašu ielu nosaukumiem, vai arī ar esošajām addr:street vērtībām ? 3) Dažreiz OSM (arī mājas numura plāksnītes) adreses pieraksts varētu atšķirties no opendata.riga.lv pierakstiem. Piemēram 70 k-6 un 70/6. Tādu adrešu punktu ir pietiekami maz, bet tomēr ir. Kā atrisināt šo vai opendata visur ir vienāds pieraksts ? Apskatot opendata katalogu redzēju, ka pastāv tikai daži varianti (kur 9 - numurs, B - burts, 11 - blakus numurs): - 9 - 9B - 9 k-9 (vai 9k-9, tie ir dažādie ar atstarpēm un bēz, bet es to ievēroju) - 9/11 un daži eksotiskie, kā 9B k-9, vai 9BC u.tml. Tātad ar / katalogā numurs ir atdalīts, tikai ja mājas numurs sastāv no diviem blakus numuriem, nevis korpusa numurs. Bet vairākās vietās Rīgā redzēju, ka uz numuru plāksnēm rakstā korpusus kā 9/1, nevis 9 k-1. Varbūt tas ir vēsturiski, bet tas arī tika ievadīts OSM. jā, pareizi laikam būtu ar k. pats gan esmu osm licis ar /, jo uz ēkas tā... būs lēnām osm jālabo :) pagaidām izklausās ļoti labi. pāris lietas, kas vēl trūka iepriekšējos mēģinājumos : * reģistrēšana importu sarakstā * atsevišķs lietotāja konts Ok, šo uztaisīsim ar laiku. Sākumā jāuzgaida apspriešanas lēmumu. ja līdz piektdienai nav iebildumi, piedāvātu importēt. līdz tam var lēnā garā uztaisīt lietotāju un palabot nepareizās ielas, adreses utt :) par vienu adresi atcerējos un nupat izlaboju :) -- Rich ___ Talk-lv mailing list Talk-lv@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv
Re: [Talk-it] R: OsmAnd 2.0 disponibile
Ottimo allora la installo subito la versione 2.05 dopo aggiornamento ad android 5.01 lollipop... Messaggio originale Da: giuse...@eppesuigoccas.homedns.org Data: 04/05/2015 23.05 A: talk-it@openstreetmap.org Ogg: Re: [Talk-it] R: OsmAnd 2.0 disponibile Il giorno lun, 04/05/2015 alle 17.30 +0200, beppebo...@libero.it ha scritto: ho letto di qualche bug, chi l'ha installata? Meglio aspettare? L'ho usata senza problemi in questi due giorni. Ho visualizzato mappe, inserito bug OSM in locale, visualizzati i bug, aggiunto commenti ai bug OSM locali, salvato tracce GPX, ottenuto indicazioni stradali, attivato OsMo. Ciao, Giuseppe ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [OSM-talk] Overpass Quotas
You could decide to require a User-Agent that's customized, with reference to contact info (e.g. a URL or project name that can be looked up on the OSM Wiki). That's not an unreasonable restriction, for your free service. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[talk-ph] Bing Imagery
Hi all, Cebu is relatively well covered, so consider this low priority. Since nobody seems to be requesting any imagery, here is what is missing or could be improved in Cebu: http://osm.totor.ph/Cebu_Missing_Bing.jpg The pink areas are missing. The yellow area is cloud covered in many places (but most things have already been traced from older Bing imagery) . and here are the same areas exported from JOSM : http://osm.totor.ph/Cebu_Missing_Bing.osm Cheers, Totor On Wed, 4/29/15, Celina Agaton wrote: Subject: Re: [talk-ph] Bing Imagery To: maning sambale Cc: osm-ph Date: Wednesday, April 29, 2015, 12:19 PM Hello there, Bing is following up again on the missing imagery. Do we have a list or timeline on how long this will take to compile?We're also prepping to complete disaster risk mapping tasks in preparation for the typhoon season, so it would be helpful to secure imagery soon. Celina celinaagaton.com Twitter @celinaagaton Skype: celinaagaton On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Celina Agaton wrote: Hi Maning, I'm talking to Bing and they are asking for a list of missing areas. Can you guys send me a list soon? Celina celinaagaton.com Twitter @celinaagaton Skype: celinaagaton ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [Talk-it] R: OsmAnd 2.0 disponibile
Da: kinetocor...@gmail.com Data: 03/05/2015 16.11 A: openstreetmap list - italianotalk-it@openstreetmap.org Ogg: [Talk-it] OsmAnd 2.0 disponibile Ciao! Volevo informare gli utilizzatori e coloro che sono interessati che è uscita la versione 2.0 di osmand. L'interfaccia è stata completamente ridisegnata e ci sono molte novità! Sito: http://osmand.net/ Leonardo On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 05:30:42PM +0200, beppebo...@libero.it wrote: ho letto di qualche bug, chi l'ha installata? Meglio aspettare? A me sarebbe piaciuto ma avevo acquistato la versione a pagamento e l'aggiornamento s'è piantato e non si riprende più. Vorrei essere sicuro di poterla reinstallare prima di rimuovere la vecchia per cui, nel dubbio per ora non faccio nulla... -- Marco Ciampa I know a joke about UDP, but you might not get it. ++ | GNU/Linux User #78271 | | FSFE fellow #364 | ++ ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-de] Offline-Software
Wie wäre es mit QLandkarteGT http://sourceforge.net/p/qlandkartegt/qlandkartegt/QLandkarte_GT/ MfG Christian aka Hedaja Am 5. Mai 2015 um 11:06 schrieb DarkAngel darkan...@ms-team.de: Navit? Hatte ich auch im Hinterkopf, nutze ich aber derzeit nur als Navi unter Maemo. Kann man in der Win-Version einfach eine GPS-Position anzeigen lassen? -- Gruß Mario ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-it] R: OsmAnd 2.0 disponibile
Puoi provare ad installare la 2.0 Free e tenerti la vecchia 1.9.5 Plus. Dovrebbero convivere senza disturbarsi... Max -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/R-OsmAnd-2-0-disponibile-tp5843232p5843376.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] R: OsmAnd 2.0 disponibile
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 04:28:05PM +0200, Leonardo wrote: Sembra ci sia un piccolo problema per i possessori della Osmand Plus: OsmAnd+ upgrade issue: due to lots of issues while upgrading OsmAnd+ (paid version) to 2.0, we organized poll (see below) in order to find and fix the issue, your feedback is important to us, in order to find the problem quicker. Right now we suspect paid apps which were moved to sdcard (http://www.pocketables.com/2014/06/fix-couldnt-install-usb-storage-sd-card.html). Avevi spostato l'applicazione sulla scheda SD? Impossibile: ho un Samsung Galaxy Nexus (Goggle phone): non ha alcuna SD... -- Marco Ciampa I know a joke about UDP, but you might not get it. ++ | GNU/Linux User #78271 | | FSFE fellow #364 | ++ ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-br] Ajuda para correção de grande erro
O seu e-mail chegou no spam (então não deu para responder antes) A primeira coisa é falar para ele parar de mexer na região e nos objetos. Se ele continuar só vai piorar a situação e o trabalho. Já mandou mensagem para ele? ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [OSM-talk] Mapillary plugin for JOSM
Looking forward to the JOSM plugin! Is there, or will there be, some sort of way that one can indicate that a sequence of Mapillary images has been reviewed and relevant content added to OSM? Perhaps a notes field in the Mapillary database where a mapper could state mapped signs or mapped surface type. Mike On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote: This brings us exciting possibilities. Someone could make a layer that detects inconsistencies between mapillary sign data and osm data. For example: -there should be a oneway street near a oneway sign -there should be a turn restriction or a oneway street junction near a sign with a turn restriction -there should be a maxspeed tag where there is a max speed sign ... Janko uto, 5. svi 2015. 00:49 Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us je napisao: On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 3:16 PM, moltonel 3x Combo molto...@gmail.com wrote: Looking forward to the josm plugin and the merging/locating of signs :) +1 - I got so excited that I purchased a new cell phone mount from GeekWire to replace my defective old mount. -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk-nl] nieuw paleis soestdijk
Op 5 mei 2015, om 16:43 heeft Steven M. Ottens ste...@minst.net het volgende geschreven: Zover ik weet hebben we met een nieuwe koning geen Nieuw Paleis Soestdijk gekregen. Maar de one-time user heinograpi heeft 3 maanden geleden het paleis op de kaart getekend: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Heinograpi/history#map=18/52.19260/5.27412layers=QD Iemand met local knowledge die daar wat zinnigs over kunnen zeggen? Ik plaast jouw bericht ook op het forum Steven, volgens mij een geval van opzettelijke kaartvernieling. Marc. ___ Talk-nl mailing list Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nl
Re: [Talk-it] R: OsmAnd 2.0 disponibile
Edit al problema 1 da me riportato: potrebbe ANCHE trattarsi di un problema di mappatura, in quanto a Murano non è riportato alcun Campo Santo Stefano; OsmAnd deduce l'indirizzo dal tag addr=* assegnato ad un locale (Busa alla torre da Lele) che si trova effettivamente su una piazza taggata solo come highway=pedestrian (ma senza nome). OK trovare l'indirizzo... ma dovrebbe ANCHE risultare l'altra località, che è a quai 3 Km di distanza! Ciao, Max -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/R-OsmAnd-2-0-disponibile-tp5843232p5843375.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [OSM-talk] contact: tags
On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 11:17:35AM -0400, Andrew MacKinnon wrote: The reason is that the contact: tags are unnecessarily verbose (we should use simpler tags whenever possible) and the simpler tags are much more popular (there are 98865 contact:phone tags but 490328 phone tags). Why do we need to have more than one way of tagging common things like phone numbers? the verbosity may be unneeded for very simple things like phone but is that true for everything covered by contact* ? key:fax? key:twitter? key:vhf? So what would you do with those tags? Richard ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk-nl] nieuw paleis soestdijk
Op 5 mei 2015, om 16:43 heeft Steven M. Ottens ste...@minst.net het volgende geschreven: Hoi allemaal, Zover ik weet hebben we met een nieuwe koning geen Nieuw Paleis Soestdijk gekregen. Maar de one-time user heinograpi heeft 3 maanden geleden het paleis op de kaart getekend: Ik heb deze heinograpi een bericht gestuurd. Afwachten van wat hij zegt! Marc. ___ Talk-nl mailing list Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nl
Re: [Talk-it] R: OsmAnd 2.0 disponibile
Ho installato la 2.0.1, per il momento ho notato 3 problemi, 2 un po' fastidiosi, il terzo un po' meno ma spero che si possa risolvere. Il routing e le indicazioni vocali, invece, non li ho ancora provati. 1 - Su Venezia, cercando Campo Santo Stefano mi dà un solo riscontro sull'isola di Murano, mentre io vorrei andare in quello (omonimo) che si trova nel Sestiere di San Marco, nelle vicinanze di Campo San Vidal. Non sembrerebbe un errore di mappatura, almeno su OSM i tag semrano a posto... Tra l'altro, cercando Campo San Vidal e perfezionando la ricerca, OsmAnd propone un incrocio proprio con Campo Santo Stefano... quindi in qualche modo lo riconosce! 2 - il pulsante per visualizzare la posizione corrente, che una volta era di dimensioni microscopiche e nell'angolo in alto a destra del diaply, ora è full-size e molto (troppo) vicino al pulsante dello zoom, in basso a destra. Capita spesso e volentieri di premerlo involontariamente mentre sto esplorando la mappa nei dintorni... 3 - In Configura la mappa, è possibile visualizzare una sola categoria di PDI per volta. Se non ricordo male, nella 1.9.5 si poteva creare un fltro personalizzato, così da mostrare contemporaneamente categorie diverse (esempio alberghi, ristoranti e bar) Max -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/R-OsmAnd-2-0-disponibile-tp5843232p5843373.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [OSM-talk] Mapillary plugin for JOSM
It’s currently possible to comment on single images, commenting on the whole sequence would be interesting. If one person thinks they have added all the details, someone else is likely to come up with some other obscure tags that would be added due to information in the photos that the original person never thought of. Being able to overlay the speed limit signs on the top of the ITO speed limit map for example could be more interesting for example. Shaun On 5 May 2015, at 16:27, Mike Thompson miketh...@gmail.com wrote: Looking forward to the JOSM plugin! Is there, or will there be, some sort of way that one can indicate that a sequence of Mapillary images has been reviewed and relevant content added to OSM? Perhaps a notes field in the Mapillary database where a mapper could state mapped signs or mapped surface type. Mike On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com mailto:jan...@gmail.com wrote: This brings us exciting possibilities. Someone could make a layer that detects inconsistencies between mapillary sign data and osm data. For example: -there should be a oneway street near a oneway sign -there should be a turn restriction or a oneway street junction near a sign with a turn restriction -there should be a maxspeed tag where there is a max speed sign ... Janko uto, 5. svi 2015. 00:49 Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us mailto:cliff...@snowandsnow.us je napisao: On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 3:16 PM, moltonel 3x Combo molto...@gmail.com mailto:molto...@gmail.com wrote: Looking forward to the josm plugin and the merging/locating of signs :) +1 - I got so excited that I purchased a new cell phone mount from GeekWire to replace my defective old mount. -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us http://osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us/ OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-it] R: OsmAnd 2.0 disponibile
Sembra ci sia un piccolo problema per i possessori della Osmand Plus: OsmAnd+ upgrade issue: due to lots of issues while upgrading OsmAnd+ (paid version) to 2.0, we organized poll (see below) in order to find and fix the issue, your feedback is important to us, in order to find the problem quicker. Right now we suspect paid apps which were moved to sdcard (http://www.pocketables.com/2014/06/fix-couldnt-install-usb-storage-sd-card.html). Avevi spostato l'applicazione sulla scheda SD? Leonardo ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[OSM-talk-nl] nieuw paleis soestdijk
Hoi allemaal, Zover ik weet hebben we met een nieuwe koning geen Nieuw Paleis Soestdijk gekregen. Maar de one-time user heinograpi heeft 3 maanden geleden het paleis op de kaart getekend: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Heinograpi/history#map=18/52.19260/5.27412layers=QD Iemand met local knowledge die daar wat zinnigs over kunnen zeggen? groet, Steven ___ Talk-nl mailing list Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nl
Re: [Talk-hr] Rijeka ortofoto - dozvola
Andrej Vlašić napisa: Ima li tko kakvu ideju kako ortofoto ubaciti kao podlogu u josm? Gledam url sa kojeg ga dohvaća, npr: Trebalo bi poslati još jedan upit u njihov zavod za inf. djelatnost i zatražiti ortofoto u tiff formatu i dozvolu da ga stavimo na http://tms.osm-hr.org/ za potrebe OSM projekta. To bi sve bilo lakše da smo udruga, ovako sumnjam da će nam dati. Zabrinjava me samo ova obavijest na početnim stranicama njihovog GIS portala: Zabranjeno je svako mijenjanje, umnožavanje i distribuiranje podataka sa navedene web stranice u bilo kojem obliku. Podatke nije dopušteno distribuirati prema trećim osobama. ___ Talk-hr mailing list Talk-hr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-hr
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Question Overpass Turbo
En gros donc c'est le processus de génération des minute diffs sur la base principale qui a un problème (initialement rejeté à tord comme wontfix car les admins d'OSM sur la base principale ont cru que c'était un problème des logiciels tiers utilisant les minute diffs). Il arrive parfois que le processus qui génère ces minute diffs soit redémarré et ne reprenne pas corectement l'état dans lequel il était et vienne alors écraser un fichier diff précédent pour le remplacer par un autre contenant plus de données ou des données différentes. Selon le moment où un service tiers (une instance Overpass par exemple) interroge les diffs, il peut donc récupérer une version ou une autre d'un de ces fichiers et n'a aucun moyen de savoir si c'est la bonne version, si la première version a déjà été traitée, les fichiers diffs suivants seront en revanche basés sur la deuxième version plus complète, et peuvent alors être rejetés comme invalides (contenant des références à des objets inexistants car ils n'étaient que dans la deuxième version du premier fichier qui a écrasé la 1re version sur la base principale). On peut donc avoir des cas de trous de mémoire sur certaines bases tierces, et on ne s'en aperçoit plus tard que parce que d'autres diffs paraitront inconsistants, essentiellement s'ils dont référence à de nouveaux objets qui n'ont pas été inclus dans une première version écrasée d'un vieux diff. Je ne vois pas de moyen simple pour les service tiers de corriger ça autrement qu'en tentant de remonter les diffs traités les uns après les autres jusqu'à trouver une diférence dans un des diffs par rapport à ceux présents sur le serveur principal: * pour éviter d'avoir à télécharger tous les fichiers diffs et les analyser les uns après les autres, il serait peut-être plus simple que le serveur des fichiers diffs tienne un index de ces fichiers (groupés toutes les heures par exemple, ou par bloc d'un millier de fichiers) contenant les empreinte (SHA1) de leur contenu, au cas où l'un d'eux aurait été regénéré dans une version ultérieure. * ensuite les services tiers pourraient comparer avec leurs propres listes d'empreintes afin de savoir depuis quel diff il y a eu une désynchronisation. Si on n'a pas ça, le seule moyen alors est de passer par la très lourde procédure de rechargement d'un dump monde (qui prends plusieurs jours même pour les meilleurs serveurs les plus puissants, y compris ceux de Mapbox), ou d'avoir sur le serveur un système qui fait des requêtes aléatoires et continues à la base principale pour tenter de détecter des oublis dans les diffs. Il est d'ailleurs probable que Mapbox ne fasse rien du tout Pour régler le problème sans repasser par la demande lourde de rechargement d'un dump, on pourrait effectuer sur la base principale une modif mineure des objets qui manquent pour que ceux-ci réapparaissent dans les diffs suivants : là les diffs reçus seront vus comme incohérents (modification reçue les concernant alors qu'on n'a pas vu leur création) : cette incohérence constatée devrait alors être suivie par une requête pleine effectuée par le serveur tiers à la base principale pour relire l'état de l'objet manquant, en dehors des diffs désynchronisés reçus. Les minutes diffs ont donc un problème de fiabilité non réglé concernant leur génération sur le serveur principal, mais les solutions à ça ne sont pas simples à régler pour les services tiers si cela dépend du moment où chacun d'eux vient les interroger (on l'a vu, l'instance overpass allemande a été impactée par cette incohérence, pas l'instance française qui a pris uniquement la seconde génération du même fichier diff, les deux versions ayant pourtant eu un contenu correct et cohérent, mais avec une version moins complète que l'autre entrainant des incohérences dasn les diffs suivants!) Le 4 mai 2015 23:02, sly (sylvain letuffe) lis...@letuffe.org a écrit : Le lundi 4 mai 2015 20:55:22, Augustin Doury a écrit : A voir d'ici quelques jours, si quelqu'un a une explication, top. Bonne soirée Pour information, l'explication en rapide ici (en anglais): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API/status et en détail là : (en anglais): https://github.com/drolbr/Overpass-API/issues/210 En rapide, aucune des modifications survenues entre 2015-04-30 12:43 et 2015-04-30 13:36 UTC ne sont présentes dans la base Overpass de http://overpass-api.de Un nouveau serveur est prévu et donc l'admin attend le remplacement de l'actuel par le nouveau, ce qui corrigera le problème. L'instance sur http://api.openstreetmap.fr/oapi/ a été corrigée par mes soins la nuit dernière et devrait contenir ce que l'autre n'a pas. -- sly (sylvain letuffe) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Sletuffe ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly Project All things delivery-related - an update
Robert Whittaker has an excellent site http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postboxes/ monitoring OSM data on postboxes in the UK. Here you can see progress (even a league table of who's contributing). From the history graph you can see there's been an increase in activity since the project got going. Perhaps Robert might provide some data analysis about the effect of the project. Enter a postcode and you can find all the missing and incorrect postboxes nearby. Wow there are loads of postboxes still missing. Wouldn't it be great if there was a smartphone app that you could load missing points in to and it would tell you about them as you travel around. It would be like a guide to where to go mapping! Geocaching for postboxes anyone? Rob ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-it] Aiutino per Wiki Loves Monuments Italia
Ciao a tutti. Non ho (quasi) mai scritto in questa mailing list, ma c'è sempre una prima volta :-) Scrivo per chiedere se c'è qualcuno che ha voglia di dare una mano con la redazione delle liste di monumenti fotografabili per l'edizione 2015 di Wiki Loves Monuments Italia. Lo scrivo qui perché in molti casi mancano le coordinate dei vari monumenti (a volte anche l'indirizzo è mancante). Se quindi qualcuno ha voglia di dedicare un po' di tempo a inserire le coordinate, le liste sono suddivise per regione e sono raggiungibili da qui: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progetto:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2015/Monumenti Potrebbe anche essere l'occasione per collegare le voci di wikipedia ai monumenti su OpenStreetMap (o mapparli se ancora non sono presenti su OSM). Piccola nota: in Campania abbiamo delle sottoliste dedicate agli scavi archeologici di Pompei ed Ercolano: in quel caso non so quanto sia fattibile l'inserimento delle coordinate, ma se si riuscisse sarebbe il massimo. Ringrazio subito chi vorrà dare una mano, magari anche solo con i monumenti della propria zona. Se poi avete voglia di contribuire anche chiedendo delle nuove autorizzazioni a enti locali o parrocchie per poter fotografare i monumenti di loro proprietà, io e Cristian Cenci https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utente:Cristian_Cenci_(WMI) (il referente nazionale di Wiki Loves Monuments) siamo a vostra disposizione per farvi avere i modelli di richiesta o per chiarire qualsiasi dubbio relativo a WLM. Ancora grazie Dario / Yiyi ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] OsmAnd 2.0 disponibile
l' ho installato oeri e provato poco oggi, su alcune strade mi dice due volte via, ad esempio svoltare a destra su via via 25 aprile, oppure su via piazza della repubblica, ma funziona correttamente con via Giacinto Pullino. Cercherò di capire meglio quando si presenta il prblema. -- iw1gfv.it piemontegps.altervista.org ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] mtb:scale
-- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/mtb-scale-tp5843223p5843397.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] OsmAnd 2.0 disponibile
Una bella app, mio unico navigatore. Mirco -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/OsmAnd-2-0-disponibile-tp5842996p5843399.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[Talk-cz] weeklyOSM CZ - Nepál
CZ překlad mimořádné zprávy z weeklyOSM: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/cz/archives/3436 Je hodně cest jak se zapojit s pomocí... ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
[OSM-talk] Using OSM on Wikitravel
I think this might be an interesting use for OSM -- Wikitravel is a wiki for travel tips (hence the name) and lacks maps on most pages! Maybe we could somehow get connected with them to include maps for all the places, states, etc. Might also show new people about OSM too. I filed a feature request with them but maybe somebody else knows them. http://wikitravel.org/ http://wikitravel.org/shared/Tech:Adding_maps_to_articles Andrew -- 600,000 DC residents don't have a vote in Congress -- http://www.dcvote.org/ http://www.dcvote.org/about/index.cfm ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk-fr] Prochaine rencontre OpenStreetMap à Nantes le 19 Mai
Il n'est jamais trop tôt pour s'organiser ... surtout que je suis en vacances la semaine prochaine. J'aimerais aborder deux sujets : * State of The Map à Brest du 29 au 31 Mai : organisons un covoiturage pour aller à cet évènement essentiel * Les évènements de septembre et octobre à Nantes : une opportunité pour élargir notre communauté Plus d'infos sur le pad : https://lite6.framapad.org/p/OSM-Nantes-2015 Bien sûr la rencontre est ouverte à tous sujets : n'hésitez pas à compléter le pad ! A bientôt, Antoine Riche. ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [Talk-it] OsmAnd 2.0 disponibile
C'è l'ho anchio, ho un pò smanettato, c'è un modo di visualizzare tipo un cruscotto, come certi garmin, dove vedi velocità, altitudine, media ecc...? -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/OsmAnd-2-0-disponibile-tp5842996p5843400.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-de] Offline-Software
Eventuell ist Marble aus dem KDE Umfeld etwas für dich? https://marble.kde.org/install.php On 05.05.2015 15:51, christian.pietz...@googlemail.com wrote: Wie wäre es mit QLandkarteGT http://sourceforge.net/p/qlandkartegt/qlandkartegt/QLandkarte_GT/ MfG Christian aka Hedaja Am 5. Mai 2015 um 11:06 schrieb DarkAngel darkan...@ms-team.de: Navit? Hatte ich auch im Hinterkopf, nutze ich aber derzeit nur als Navi unter Maemo. Kann man in der Win-Version einfach eine GPS-Position anzeigen lassen? -- Gruß Mario -- Live long and prosper Robin Schneider signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [OSM-talk-be] route = foot
Sorry to bring up this old thread, I was bored so I skimmed a bit through old unopened mails from the mailing list and I thought I should mention this: There's also this proposal for 'virtual highways': https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/virtual_highway The original proposal uses highway=virtual, I suggested using highway:virtual=pedestrian/... instead so you don't have to add all access restrictions by hand. I am not sure whether it is a good idea or not, but the proposal is there on the wiki. Groeten Ruben On 20 Jan 2015 23:29, Gilbert Hersschens gherssch...@gmail.com wrote: Bedankt. Weer iets bijgeleerd. 2015-01-20 22:14 GMT+01:00 Jo winfi...@gmail.com: route=foot lijkt mij ook een redelijk elegante oplossing om zowel een continue reeks ways te hebben in de relatie, zonder de rendering te beïnvloeden. Op 20 januari 2015 22:12 schreef Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com: Dit zijn stukjes over pleinen waar enkele routes over gaan, je kan moeilijk het hele plein toevoegen omdat je dan de exacte route verliest, en aangezien er niets verschillend in realiteit is kan je er ook niet echt een highway=footway of pedestrian aan geven. Vandaar dus route=foot/bicycle, en die kun je nog wel op enkele andere plekken vinden in het land. Of dat dit nu correct is of niet, het is toch duidelijk wat de bedoeling is, dus niets mis mee wat mij betreft. Ben On Tuesday 20 January 2015 21:13:47 Gilbert Hersschens wrote: Er loopt een wandel route dwars over de markt van Geel. Die markt is een voetgangerszone getagd als highway = pedestrian + area = yes. Omdat die highway dus geen way maar een area is heeft de mapper er gewoon een lijn door getrokken om de 2 stukken weg dwars over de markt te verbinden (om de route niet te breken) en dat stukje weg getagd met route = foot. Nu is route normalerwijze een relatie type en geen highway tag. Ik vraag me dus af of dit de correcte tag is voor een virtuele weg over een plein. Het is in elk geval een creatieve oplossing, maar misschien is er een andere, meer correcte manier ? zie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148011489 Gilbert ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk] contact: tags
2015-05-05 17:21 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com: the verbosity may be unneeded for very simple things like phone but is that true for everything covered by contact* ? key:fax? key:twitter? key:vhf? have you seen taginfo? 906 vhf 182 vhf_channel 73 waterway:vhf_channel 36 lock:VHF_channel 32 VHF 16 contact:vhf http://taginfo.osm.org/search?q=vhf twitter and fax are less clear, but the contact:-form is always less in use. Cheers, Martin ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-it] OsmAnd 2.0 disponibile
OpzioniConfigura schermo c'è tutto tranne la media. Ciao, Mirco Il 05/05/2015 19:16, ramon [via GIS] ha scritto: C'è l'ho anchio, ho un pò smanettato, c'è un modo di visualizzare tipo un cruscotto, come certi garmin, dove vedi velocità, altitudine, media ecc...? If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/OsmAnd-2-0-disponibile-tp5842996p5843400.html To unsubscribe from OsmAnd 2.0 disponibile, click here http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=5842996code=bWlyY296b3J6b0BpbndpbmQuaXR8NTg0Mjk5NnwtODczMDE0MjQw. NAML http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewerid=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.namlbase=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespacebreadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml -- Mi piacciono Osmand.net e Openstreetmap.org mircozo...@pec.it -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/OsmAnd-2-0-disponibile-tp5842996p5843401.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [OSM-talk] Using OSM on Wikitravel
Thanks, that's good info. I had no idea! I've been editing there for some time. Andrew On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote: I'd be inclined to read up on the history of WikiTravel, before you go any further. You might also like to look at WikiVoyage: https://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Wikivoyage:Cooperating_with_OpenStreetMap http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Collaboration_with_Wikivoyage On 5 May 2015 at 17:25, Andrew Wiseman awise...@gmail.com wrote: I think this might be an interesting use for OSM -- Wikitravel is a wiki for travel tips (hence the name) and lacks maps on most pages! Maybe we could somehow get connected with them to include maps for all the places, states, etc. Might also show new people about OSM too. I filed a feature request with them but maybe somebody else knows them. http://wikitravel.org/ http://wikitravel.org/shared/Tech:Adding_maps_to_articles Andrew -- 600,000 DC residents don't have a vote in Congress -- http://www.dcvote.org/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- 600,000 DC residents don't have a vote in Congress -- http://www.dcvote.org/ http://www.dcvote.org/about/index.cfm ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-hr] Rijeka ortofoto - dozvola
Štop se tiče slanja kao udruga, možemo preko drugih udruga koje su zainteresirane za open data. Trenutno sam u gužvi, ali dobio sam neke šprance po kojima možemo tražiti podatke za ponovnu upotrebu. Ako možemo dobiti georeferencirani tiff to bi bilo najbolje jer bi ga mogli staviti na http://tms.osm-hr.org/ Imam još toga za reći ali nestignem trenutno. Hrvoje On 05/05/2015 05:06 PM, Ivan Delac wrote: Andrej Vlašić napisa: Ima li tko kakvu ideju kako ortofoto ubaciti kao podlogu u josm? Gledam url sa kojeg ga dohvaća, npr: Trebalo bi poslati još jedan upit u njihov zavod za inf. djelatnost i zatražiti ortofoto u tiff formatu i dozvolu da ga stavimo na http://tms.osm-hr.org/ za potrebe OSM projekta. To bi sve bilo lakše da smo udruga, ovako sumnjam da će nam dati. Zabrinjava me samo ova obavijest na početnim stranicama njihovog GIS portala: Zabranjeno je svako mijenjanje, umnožavanje i distribuiranje podataka sa navedene web stranice u bilo kojem obliku. Podatke nije dopušteno distribuirati prema trećim osobama. ___ Talk-hr mailing list Talk-hr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-hr ___ Talk-hr mailing list Talk-hr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-hr
Re: [Talk-cz] Bordel
Ahoj, Dne Út 5. května 2015 13:49:36, Martin Švec - OSM napsal(a): Petře, můžeš vytáhnout něco jako SELECT changeset_id, user, COUNT(sirotci) ... GROUP BY changeset_id v kterém uzly osiřely? Namátkou to vypadá jen na pár changesetů. Rád bych vyloučil chybu v Traceru. já nemám historii, takže nemůžu nalézt changeset, ve kterém uzly osiřely, ale s vysokou pravděpodobností to bude ten changeset poslední. Ledaže by někdo tyto sirotky editoval; těžko. Přikládám group-by changeset i group-by user. sarkasmVýsledek asi málokoho překvapí/sarkasm. Btw, nedávno jsem při nahrávání LPISu narazil na zajímavou haluz -- v changesetu se mi náhodně zdvojily cesty LPIS polí. Duplikáty měly stejné tagy a sdílely všechny svoje uzly. Jako kdyby JOSM nahrál část nových cest a relací dvakrát za sebou. Objevil jsem je až za měsíc v Osmose, byl to jeden konkrétní changeset. Tracer to (doufám) udělat nemohl, to bych hned viděl, dvojitá pole měla v JOSM tmavší barvu. Tohle se občas, ale opravdu jen občas stane. Nejsem si úplně jist, zda je to softwarem nebo člověkem. Spíš to přisuzuji sobě. Nicméně - pokud jsou oba polygony naprosto stejné, JOSM, doufám, že vždy, zařve. Stalo se mi ovšem i to, že nebyly naprosto stejné. Sdílely třeba všechny uzly až na jeden. To může IMO vzniknout tak, že když se tracuje podruhé, je to jiná situace - na daném místě už landuse je. Co se týká povšimnutí si duplicity, tak nevím, o jaké tmavší barvě to píšeš - to asi hodně závisí na nastavení JOSM. Mám tu skript, který umí najít duplicity či téměř duplicity z LPIS, tak jsem ho teď pustil, ono to bude nějakou dobu chroupat. -- Petr Martin Dne 5.5.2015 v 6:56 Marián Kyral napsal(a): Ahoj, můžeš udělat nějakou statistiku? Stáří, changesety, uživatelé? Co jsem tak namátkou prošel, všechno to byly uzly staré dva měsíce od jednoho uživatele. Možná nějaký dočasný problém. Ať už JOSM nebo OSM API? Marián -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Petr Vejsada o...@propsychology.cz Komu: talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Datum: 5. 5. 2015 2:42:16 Předmět: [Talk-cz] Bordel Ahoj, právě mažu přes 200 tisíc osiřelých uzlů. Wtf? http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30794706 -- p ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-czcount,display_name 196813,Petr1868 8222,kwiecpav 732,hopet 403,Maatts 191,petr_balicek 94,jf01 26,gorn 22,Still gelegtes Profil 19,Frema07 16,Chenn Zenn 12,kulich 11,WojtekK 10,PaLenka 7,Pavel Bokr 5,tourist_infra_wfe 3,pavel 3,jttt 3,Zmianowy 3,Milan KerĹĄlĂĄger 3,Mike Crash 2,Ingmar Booij 2,montardo 2,sasek 2,NoOne 2,vop 2,Rongel 2,pschonmann 1,OSMF Redaction Account 1,hrÄas 1,Salamandr 1,mirp549121 1,ValisCZ 1,BiIbo 1,shst 1,Jaroslav HamĂĄÄek 1,melounek 1,kralma9 1,vrabcak 1,Datin 1,MarvCZ 1,pedro' 1,Hlav 1,pavelhusek 1,hanoj 1,korytaacheck 1,photo-rudy 1,Pepask 1,VladimirCZ 1,StaH 1,Luis_III 1,ulmtuelp 1,elvis700 1,bahamy 1,Lumi(r) 1,Jarda Vagenknecht 1,jarvan 1,Pascal20ausL 1,Mirekk46 1,osmtraveller 1,kuesa count,changeset_id,display_name,created_at 5,29629486,Petr1868,2015-03-22 06:21:56.709036 45994,29629313,Petr1868,2015-03-22 06:21:56.709036 44737,29622574,Petr1868,2015-03-21 07:48:27.512386 41471,29577573,Petr1868,2015-03-19 19:10:37.530032 13769,29930635,Petr1868,2015-04-04 05:41:59.21237 8222,29369350,kwiecpav,2015-03-10 06:21:56.309783 500,29272785,hopet,2015-03-06 07:48:35.360744 456,29578084,Petr1868,2015-03-19 19:10:37.530032 403,29887944,Maatts,2015-04-02 12:45:49.419823 232,29370399,hopet,2015-03-10 06:21:56.309783 182,29578988,Petr1868,2015-03-19 19:10:37.530032 110,29635402,petr_balicek,2015-03-22 06:21:56.709036 86,29577557,Petr1868,2015-03-19 19:10:37.530032 78,29640906,petr_balicek,2015-03-22 06:21:56.709036 50,30045622,Petr1868,2015-04-10 02:31:30.390945 50,29368650,Petr1868,2015-03-10 06:21:56.309783 33,4712517,jf01,2014-03-11 00:19:54.501227 25,29418317,gorn,2015-03-19 08:03:04.003316 21,6300165,jf01,2014-03-11 00:19:54.501227 16,29663309,Chenn Zenn,2015-03-27 07:33:33.547739 12,30137371,Frema07,2015-04-12 18:19:35.506352 11,29240787,WojtekK,2015-03-06 07:48:35.360744 11,29623070,Petr1868,2015-03-21 07:48:27.512386 11,6223944,jf01,2014-03-11 00:19:54.501227 10,29702277,PaLenka,2015-03-27 07:33:33.547739 9,13769808,Still gelegtes Profil,2014-03-11 00:19:54.501227 8,13829484,Still gelegtes Profil,2014-03-11 00:19:54.501227 7,10229118,kulich,2014-03-11 00:19:54.501227 7,27608991,Pavel Bokr,2014-12-24 07:22:01.767162 6,6008079,jf01,2014-03-11 00:19:54.501227 6,11370195,Petr1868,2014-03-11 00:19:54.501227 5,6300987,jf01,2014-03-11 00:19:54.501227 5,10084333,kulich,2014-03-11 00:19:54.501227 4,4709508,jf01,2014-03-11
[talk-au] OSM people in ACT
Hi All, I am searching for active OSM contributors in ACT, if you are one please email me or contact me via my mobile. I am interested to get your thoughts on the current state of OSM in ACT and if there is any aspect the government can assist in. Cheers Kristy Van Putten kristy.vanput...@gmail.com 0414844825 ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] OSM people in ACT
Hi Kristy, I'm not in the ACT but the following would be nice data to add and could be done by anyone if licenced appropriately. Addresses In a ESRI shape file or osm file geocoded like the Vic, Tas and Qld. Victorian and Tasmanian are the best examples have a look at thelist.tas.gov.au or data.vic.gov.au Building outlines. In an ESRI shape file or osm file geocoded like the Launceston and Glenorchy City Council data on thelist.tas.gov.au also. Road centerlines with names. As a wms layer same as at thelist.tas.gov.au This is not overly necessary as most of the names can be deduced from the address data. Just sometimes there is short streets where there is no actual property with an address so it can be looked up. Also where one road changes names partway along the road with no discernable intersection. Cheers Ross On 05/05/15 16:11, Kristy Van Putten wrote: Hi All, I am searching for active OSM contributors in ACT, if you are one please email me or contact me via my mobile. I am interested to get your thoughts on the current state of OSM in ACT and if there is any aspect the government can assist in. Cheers Kristy Van Putten kristy.vanput...@gmail.com 0414844825 ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [OSM-talk] Mapillary plugin for JOSM
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us wrote: On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 3:16 PM, moltonel 3x Combo molto...@gmail.com wrote: Looking forward to the josm plugin and the merging/locating of signs :) +1 - I got so excited that I purchased a new cell phone mount from GeekWire to replace my defective old mount. Actually found a good mount at Best Buy. It's got a bit of bounce to it, which is good since it seems to work as a shock absorber. It's also got a very long arm on it, which is also handy since I drive a 4x4 and a state of borderline neglect, so having a mount with some bounce to it that I can actually reach from the windshield is a great match for decently consistent stability. http://www.bracketron.com/universal-grip-it-windshield-mount#.VUhXn1VVhBc ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [talk-au] OSM people in ACT
Thanks Jason, This is a great tool! The majority of government is trying to move to an open license, with GA leading in the geospatial front. What we need to get our heads around is the difference between CCBY 4.0 and ODBL. Community outreach programs would be great, or even potentially working with spatial institutes such as SSSI to encourage OSM in schools. I will take a look at the import list and see whats happening around the world - your right this might shed a light on potential assistance. As Andrew just pointed out access to imagery would also be very beneficial, I will look into this a bit further and see what can be done there (specially ACT to start with). I will start to contact the super users in ACT. Cheers On Tue, 5 May 2015 at 16:44 Jason Ward jasonjwa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Kristy, Not a large userbase in the ACT and not all of them may subscribe to this list. To help you in your search the following link may prove useful (Suggest unticking Black, Red and Orange users in the top left corner for a closer measure of 'active' contributors) http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/oooc?zoom=11lat=-35.29175lon=149.17885layers=B00FTT While I don't represent the contributors in ACT it would be great if (the whole of) government was able to provide or make accessible data with suitable licence clearances for use in OSM. Despite that and noting the small contributor count in the region maybe more 'useful' would be the application of resources to help with the contribution of data OR some sort of government advocacy/community growth initiative with the long game being to build the local contributor base. To adapt a recent phrase from another list, OSM is a collection of on-the-ground observations and while there is a place for supply of government information, and notwithstanding your Indonesian HOT experience, your time would be well spent looking at some of the imports carried out in other parts of the world (some good, others less so), as well as subscribing to the @imports list (if you haven't done so) for a view into the workings OSM members apply to externally supplied information. Cheers, Jason M: 0438740049 On 5 May 2015 at 16:11, Kristy Van Putten kristy.vanput...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I am searching for active OSM contributors in ACT, if you are one please email me or contact me via my mobile. I am interested to get your thoughts on the current state of OSM in ACT and if there is any aspect the government can assist in. Cheers Kristy Van Putten kristy.vanput...@gmail.com 0414844825 ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
[Talk-cz] Fwd: Bordel (fwd)
-- Přeposlaná zpráva -- Od: Zdeněk Pražák zpra...@seznam.cz Datum: 5. května 2015 8:57 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Bordel (fwd) Komu: Libor Pechacek lpecha...@gmx.com ano, tenkrát při nahrávání mi nějak kolaboval počítač a jednotlivé body se nespojily. Snažil jsem se to opravit v dalších changesetech, ale nespojené body asi zůstaly Pražák Dne 5. května 2015 7:16 Libor Pechacek lpecha...@gmx.com napsal(a): Historie některých uzlů naznačuje spojitost s importem z LPIS. Zdeňku? Libor - Forwarded message from Marián Kyral mky...@email.cz - Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 06:56:43 +0200 (CEST) From: Marián Kyral mky...@email.cz To: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-cz] Bordel X-Mailer: szn-ebox-4.4.270 Reply-To: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Ahoj, můžeš udělat nějakou statistiku? Stáří, changesety, uživatelé? Co jsem tak namátkou prošel, všechno to byly uzly staré dva měsíce od jednoho uživatele. Možná nějaký dočasný problém. Ať už JOSM nebo OSM API? Marián -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Petr Vejsada o...@propsychology.cz Komu: talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Datum: 5. 5. 2015 2:42:16 Předmět: [Talk-cz] Bordel Ahoj, právě mažu přes 200 tisíc osiřelých uzlů. Wtf? http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30794706 -- p ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz; ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz - End forwarded message - -- ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
[Talk-it] ferrovia mineraria o no ?
Nel museo minerario di Abbadia San Salvatore è stato realizzato un percorso su treno decauville rivolto ai visitatori: posate le rotaie su un prato, è stato poi ricoperto cosicchè i vagoni viaggiano al livello “0” (ancora chiuse e pericolose le gallerie a -400mt !!!) Bing mostra ancora foto dei lavori , quindi è ricalcabile ma con che tag ? Dopotutto non è una vera ferrovia industriale (anche se il materiale lo è) ma più affine ai trenini dei parchi giochi. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[Talk-cz] Fwd: Re: Bordel (fwd)
Ještě jednou, nešlo to do konference... Marián -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Marián Kyral mky...@email.cz Komu: Libor Pechacek lpecha...@gmx.com Datum: 5. 5. 2015 7:32:41 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Bordel (fwd) No vypadá to, že velká většina pochází z jednoho nepovedeného changesetu. Tyhle osiřelé body se většinou tvořily při selhání uploadu na OSM. Marián -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Libor Pechacek lpecha...@gmx.com Komu: Zdeněk Pražák zpra...@seznam.cz Datum: 5. 5. 2015 7:16:35 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Bordel (fwd) Historie některých uzlů naznačuje spojitost s importem z LPIS. Zdeňku? Libor - Forwarded message from Marián Kyral mky...@email.cz - Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 06:56:43 +0200 (CEST) From: Marián Kyral mky...@email.cz To: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-cz] Bordel X-Mailer: szn-ebox-4.4.270 Reply-To: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Ahoj, můžeš udělat nějakou statistiku? Stáří, changesety, uživatelé? Co jsem tak namátkou prošel, všechno to byly uzly staré dva měsíce od jednoho uživatele. Možná nějaký dočasný problém. Ať už JOSM nebo OSM API? Marián -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Petr Vejsada o...@propsychology.cz Komu: talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Datum: 5. 5. 2015 2:42:16 Předmět: [Talk-cz] Bordel Ahoj, právě mažu přes 200 tisíc osiřelých uzlů. Wtf? http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30794706 -- p ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz; ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz - End forwarded message - -- ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [OSM-talk] Mapillary plugin for JOSM
This brings us exciting possibilities. Someone could make a layer that detects inconsistencies between mapillary sign data and osm data. For example: -there should be a oneway street near a oneway sign -there should be a turn restriction or a oneway street junction near a sign with a turn restriction -there should be a maxspeed tag where there is a max speed sign ... Janko uto, 5. svi 2015. 00:49 Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us je napisao: On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 3:16 PM, moltonel 3x Combo molto...@gmail.com wrote: Looking forward to the josm plugin and the merging/locating of signs :) +1 - I got so excited that I purchased a new cell phone mount from GeekWire to replace my defective old mount. -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [talk-au] OSM people in ACT
Hi Kristy, Not a large userbase in the ACT and not all of them may subscribe to this list. To help you in your search the following link may prove useful (Suggest unticking Black, Red and Orange users in the top left corner for a closer measure of 'active' contributors) http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/oooc?zoom=11lat=-35.29175lon=149.17885layers=B00FTT While I don't represent the contributors in ACT it would be great if (the whole of) government was able to provide or make accessible data with suitable licence clearances for use in OSM. Despite that and noting the small contributor count in the region maybe more 'useful' would be the application of resources to help with the contribution of data OR some sort of government advocacy/community growth initiative with the long game being to build the local contributor base. To adapt a recent phrase from another list, OSM is a collection of on-the-ground observations and while there is a place for supply of government information, and notwithstanding your Indonesian HOT experience, your time would be well spent looking at some of the imports carried out in other parts of the world (some good, others less so), as well as subscribing to the @imports list (if you haven't done so) for a view into the workings OSM members apply to externally supplied information. Cheers, Jason M: 0438740049 On 5 May 2015 at 16:11, Kristy Van Putten kristy.vanput...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I am searching for active OSM contributors in ACT, if you are one please email me or contact me via my mobile. I am interested to get your thoughts on the current state of OSM in ACT and if there is any aspect the government can assist in. Cheers Kristy Van Putten kristy.vanput...@gmail.com 0414844825 ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [Talk-it] Kathmandu, OSM e il Politecnico di Milano
2015-05-04 14:59 GMT+02:00 Andrea Fredduzzi andreafr...@gmail.com: Il 4 maggio 2015 10:34, Stefano Salvador stefano.salva...@gmail.com ha scritto: Le cose cambiano quando devo usare i dati per il coordinamento dell'emergenza, in questo caso avere i dati vettoriali grezzi in un formato compatibile con i software GIS è imprescindibile, questo sia per avere la massima flessibilità del rendering (di una stessa porzione di territorio devo poter fare mappe tematiche di ogni tipo in base a chi andrà ad utilizzarle) sia per le analisi geografiche in cui necessariamente i dati di base devono essere mescolati a dati specialistici provenienti da altre fonti. Con gli strumenti che mette a disposizione Google entrambe queste attività sono semplicemente impossibili. Credo proprio questo sia il punto: OSM non mette a disposizione semplicemente una mappa ma il proprio geodatabase al completo (non credo che Google possa fare altrettanto). Questa è una differenza enorme. +1, per esempio non si può mettere sui GPS mentre OSM si ;-) -- ciao Luca http://gis.cri.fmach.it/delucchi/ www.lucadelu.org ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-cz] Bordel
Mozno by tu bolo na mieste pouzit JOSM reverter plugin. 2015-05-05 2:41 GMT+02:00 Petr Vejsada o...@propsychology.cz: Ahoj, právě mažu přes 200 tisíc osiřelých uzlů. Wtf? http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30794706 -- p ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz -- Ing. Martin Ždila http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/*Martin* OZ Freemap Slovakia tel:+421-908-363-848 mailto:martin.zd...@freemap.sk http://www.freemap.sk/ ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-it] mtb:scale
Da: demon.box e.rossin...@alice.it Ecco in questi casi voi come fareste? meglio essere il più precisi e vicini possibile alla realtà (rasentando quasi la paranoia) cioé 100m mtb:scale=1 poi 5m mtb:scale=2 e così via oppure mettereste tutto mtb:scale=1 perché la maggior parte rientra in questo valore? In linea di massima mi piace la prima soluzione ma in pratica opto quasi sempre per la seconda, anche perché se percorro un sentiero in discesa in bici non mi prendo il tempo di fermarmi a marcare i tratti più complicati Ciao Pietro ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Kathmandu, OSM e il Politecnico di Milano
On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 03:57:35AM -0700, Aury88 wrote: non spiega perchè abbiano scelto la mappa osm...dicono solamente che hanno inviato a loro questa richiesta (potrebbero averla tra l'altro inviata anche a google o a enti governativi, naturalmente sul wiki o il blog dedicato alle attività HOT si parla delle richieste inviate ad essa non a quelle inviate ad altri) sarebbe strano che avessero inviato anche ad enti governativi, visto che questi incoraggiano OSM (mapgive) ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [talk-au] OSM people in ACT
I'm here. Nathanael Coyne (Boehm) www.purecaffeine.com Canberra, Australia 0431 698 580 On 5 May 2015 at 16:11, Kristy Van Putten kristy.vanput...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I am searching for active OSM contributors in ACT, if you are one please email me or contact me via my mobile. I am interested to get your thoughts on the current state of OSM in ACT and if there is any aspect the government can assist in. Cheers Kristy Van Putten kristy.vanput...@gmail.com 0414844825 ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [Talk-hr] Rijeka ortofoto - dozvola
Mislim da jesu njihove. JLS obično kupe od DGU-a DOF-ove i jedino su tu upitno uvjeti pod kojima su oni kupili te DOF-ove a znam da su često ti uvijeti ograničenog korištenja u smislu da se mogu koristiti samo za npr. potrebe vizualizacije na interaktivnoj karti od te institucije. Problem je kako dohvatiti te DOF-ove jer nemaju standardni interface (WMS). Čini mi se da je ovo rješenje bazirano na starom ESRI-jevom ArcIMS-u koji nema WMS (WMS connector je poseban plugin za ArcIMS) i trebat će to malo tvikati. Kad smo već kod toga, ne znam da li je netko već povukao pitanje korištenja geografskih imena. Podaci su dostupni za download, a u uvjetima korištenja piše da su uvjeti pristupa i korištenja: nema uvjeta, Ograničenja javnog pristupa: nema ograničenja http://geoportal.nipp.hr/hr/application/find#|ebf8b494-338b-4d05-81ad-e56dbf9c008d. 2015-05-04 23:34 GMT+02:00 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com: Svaka čast, jako uzbudljive vijesti! Ipak, prvo bih provjerio jesu li to zaista njihove ortofoto karte ili ih oni samo koriste. Ponekad ljudi zaborave da nešto samo iznajmljuju. U karti sa podacima možda ima nekih granica koje je Rijeka kupila od DGUa ili nekog drugog. Ako je to stvarno sve njihovo, onda možemo dalje. Ovo daje nadu da bi takvo nešto mogli probati i u drugim gradovima. Janko pon, 4. svi 2015. 19:03 Andrej Vlašić andrej.vlas...@gmail.com je napisao: Pozdrav, Poslao sam Gradu Rijeci upit ako se smije koristiti njihov ortofoto sa stranice http://www2.rijeka.hr/ip2/ kao podlogu u osm, i dobio sam dolje navedeni odgovor. Orotfoto je odličan, u mjerilu 1:250 se sve dobro vidi, a ima i podlogu za ulice sa imenima i kućnim brojevima, i pretraživanje po njima. Isto sam pitao i za ove dvije stranice sa popisom ulica: http://ulice-kbr.rijeka.hr http://ulice.rijeka.hr Ima li tko kakvu ideju kako ortofoto ubaciti kao podlogu u josm? Gledam url sa kojeg ga dohvaća, npr: http://www2.rijeka.hr/ip2/webmap/map.asp?mapw=1660maph=542bgr=1mapid=0qStreetId=0qHouseNrId=0qFrom=0qTo=0x1=5454652y1=5021772x2=5455076y2=5021428sp=0sm=1 Ako povećam maph i mapw varijable, onda mi vrati veću sliku (inaće ovisi o velićini prozora u browseru), pa kad povećam visinu mogu dobiti od sjevera do juga cijeli komad grada sa nekim ne prevelikom širinom (inaće se server pobuni da nemože vratiti request). Ovaj x1, y1, x2, y2 nemam pojma kako rade, početak je u nekom njihovom kooridnatnom sustavu koliko vidim. Moglo bi se onda iterativno cijeli grad pokupiti na najvećem zoomu, pa spojiti i georeferencirati, ili ima netko bolju ideju? -- Forwarded message -- From: Ri-info ri-i...@rijeka.hr Date: 2015-05-04 11:04 GMT+02:00 Subject: RE: pitanje u vezi koristenja podataka To: Andrej Vlašić andrej.vlas...@gmail.com Poštovani, Po Vašem upitu proslijedili smo mail Zavodu za informatičku djelatnost Grada Rijeke i prosljeđujemo Vam odgovor koji nam je uputio Pročelnik odjela: --- Poštovana/i, Podaci se objavljuju u najboljoj vjeri, a elektronički oblik u kojem se podaci objavljuju podložan je promjenama bez prethodne najave. Grad ne snosi odgovornost za bilo kakvu štetu koju nekome možda može prouzročiti nedostupnost, promjena formata podatka ili eventualna netočnost objavljenih podataka na izvorima koje gdin. Vlašić spominje. Grad Rijeka se u objavi podataka rukovodi preporukama Europske unije koje se temelje na ideji da javni podaci moraju biti dostupni građanima kako bi ih mogli slobodno upotrebljavati. Više o tome na: http://europa.eu/publications/open-data/index_hr.htm Zaključno, podaci koje gdin. Vlašić navodi su javni podaci i kao takvi mogu se koristiti bez ograničenja. Lijepi pozdrav Željko Jurić, pročelnik --- Nadamo se da smo uspjeli odgovoriti na Vaše pitanje. Srdačan pozdrav, Daniela Klaričić RI INFO Informativni centar Grada Rijeke Korzo 18b 51000 Rijeka Hrvatska T: +385 51 209 691 F: +385 51 209 692 E: ri-i...@rijeka.hr W: www.rijeka.hr ___ Talk-hr mailing list Talk-hr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-hr ___ Talk-hr mailing list Talk-hr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-hr -- Darko Boto Phone: +385 1 6676 918 mob: +385 91 1365 614 e-mail: darko.b...@gmail.com ___ Talk-hr mailing list Talk-hr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-hr
Re: [Talk-de] Offline-Software
Navit? Gruß, Martin ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Offline-Software
Navit? Hatte ich auch im Hinterkopf, nutze ich aber derzeit nur als Navi unter Maemo. Kann man in der Win-Version einfach eine GPS-Position anzeigen lassen? -- Gruß Mario ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [talk-au] OSM people in ACT [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Thanks Kristy, I would support the idea of discerning the difference between CCBY and ODBL. THe intent of the open data policy is to make data useable with minimal restriction, and ODBL seems to be an appropriate instrument for handling this in database format. CCBY seems ok for maps but not for databases. I got in touch with OSM contributor Michael Cleary last week who was visiting GA as part of the Power of Maps conference. He outlined pretty well what he sees the issues are viz ODBL vs CCBY4.0. I am beginning to get a clearer picture on what these issues are and am keen to get it resolved, but will need continued feedback from the OSM community on this. This is also worth bringing up in the Foundation Spatial Data Framework policy discussions which I am heavily involved in. FSDF also needs to consider the role of volunteered geographic information in the update of national foundation spatial datasets - so there is even greater imperative to have OSM involved in those discussions. The use cases included in the email trail are excellent examples of the need to get this sorted. Thanks, Simon Simon Costello Branch Head, National Location Information | EGD Management Environmental Geoscience Division | GEOSCIENCE AUSTRALIA Phone: +61 2 6249 9716tel:+61%202%206249%209716Fax: +61 2 6249 tel:+61%202%206249%20 Email: simon.coste...@ga.gov.aumailto:simon.coste...@ga.gov.auWeb: www.ga.gov.auhttp://www.ga.gov.au/ Cnr Jerrabomberra Avenue and Hindmarsh Drive Symonston ACT GPO Box 378 Canberra ACT 2601 Australiax-apple-data-detectors://3 Applying geoscience to Australia’s most important challenges On 5 May 2015, at 5:00 pm, kristy van putten kristy.vanput...@gmail.commailto:kristy.vanput...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Jason, This is a great tool! The majority of government is trying to move to an open license, with GA leading in the geospatial front. What we need to get our heads around is the difference between CCBY 4.0 and ODBL. Community outreach programs would be great, or even potentially working with spatial institutes such as SSSI to encourage OSM in schools. I will take a look at the import list and see whats happening around the world - your right this might shed a light on potential assistance. As Andrew just pointed out access to imagery would also be very beneficial, I will look into this a bit further and see what can be done there (specially ACT to start with). I will start to contact the super users in ACT. Cheers On Tue, 5 May 2015 at 16:44 Jason Ward jasonjwa...@gmail.commailto:jasonjwa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Kristy, Not a large userbase in the ACT and not all of them may subscribe to this list. To help you in your search the following link may prove useful (Suggest unticking Black, Red and Orange users in the top left corner for a closer measure of 'active' contributors) http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/oooc?zoom=11lat=-35.29175lon=149.17885layers=B00FTT While I don't represent the contributors in ACT it would be great if (the whole of) government was able to provide or make accessible data with suitable licence clearances for use in OSM. Despite that and noting the small contributor count in the region maybe more 'useful' would be the application of resources to help with the contribution of data OR some sort of government advocacy/community growth initiative with the long game being to build the local contributor base. To adapt a recent phrase from another list, OSM is a collection of on-the-ground observations and while there is a place for supply of government information, and notwithstanding your Indonesian HOT experience, your time would be well spent looking at some of the imports carried out in other parts of the world (some good, others less so), as well as subscribing to the @imports list (if you haven't done so) for a view into the workings OSM members apply to externally supplied information. Cheers, Jason M: 0438740049tel:0438740049 On 5 May 2015 at 16:11, Kristy Van Putten kristy.vanput...@gmail.commailto:kristy.vanput...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I am searching for active OSM contributors in ACT, if you are one please email me or contact me via my mobile. I am interested to get your thoughts on the current state of OSM in ACT and if there is any aspect the government can assist in. Cheers Kristy Van Putten kristy.vanput...@gmail.commailto:kristy.vanput...@gmail.com 0414844825tel:0414844825 ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.orgmailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au Geoscience Australia Disclaimer: This e-mail (and files transmitted with it) is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, then you have received this e-mail by mistake and any use, dissemination,
Re: [Talk-it] mtb:scale
2015-05-04 16:03 GMT+02:00 demon.box e.rossin...@alice.it: Ecco in questi casi voi come fareste? meglio essere il più precisi e vicini possibile alla realtà (rasentando quasi la paranoia) cioé 100m mtb:scale=1 poi 5m mtb:scale=2 e così via oppure mettereste tutto mtb:scale=1 perché la maggior parte rientra in questo valore? più dettagliato è meglio, nel caso che non ti è possibile, sceglierei il valore più difficile e non quello meno difficile. Ciao, Martin ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] natural=spring oppure amenity=drinking_water ?
Il 5 maggio 2015 01:22, mbranco2 ha scritto: Provo a dire la mia basandomi sulla mia esperienza di escursionista più che quella di mappatore OSM (sono ancora novizio a riguardo) : ti faccio notare che: se è una fontanella, già taggata come amenity=drinking_water, è superfluo. per come nascono le etichette in OSM e per come si inseriscono, a livello di dati non esistono valori predefiniti perché non puoi sapere se il mappatore si è dimenticato di inserirlo e quindi nessuna etichetta è superflua ogni utilizzatore dei dati può decidere quale significato dare alla mancanza di un'etichetta, come nel caso del routing dove la mancanza di acess e oneway viene interpretata come la possibilità di passare in entrambe le direzioni -- Daniele Forsi ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[Talk-de] Offline-Software
Hallo, ich suche eine Software für Windows (möglichst einfach und simple), die ohne Internetzugang in Offline-OSM-Karten eine manuell eingegebene GPS-Position anzeigt. Irgendwie habe ich noch nicht das richtige dazu gefunden. -- Gruß Mario ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
[Talk-at] Details zu Modified Nodes herausfinden
Hallo, ich war heute eher zufällig auf der OSMstats Seite ( http://osmstats.neis-one.org/?item=countriescountry=Austria# ), dabei ist mir aufgefallen, dass am 04.05. in Österreich 34539 Nodes geändert wurden. Da ich ja prinzipiell neugierig bin und die Anzahl so weit über den üblichen 5000 - 6000 Änderungen pro Tag ist. Stellt sich mir die Frage, wie man hierzu nähere Details herausfinden könnte? lg Florian aka Miflo --- Diese E-Mail ist frei von Viren und Malware, denn der avast! Antivirus Schutz ist aktiv. http://www.avast.com ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
[OSM-legal-talk] What extra permissions are needed to include CC-BY data in OSM
I'm bringing up a conversation from talk-au pertaining to what additional permissions we need from content owners in order to include or use as a source to derive further information from their CC-BY licensed data in OSM. Any advice is very much appreciated. On 16 April 2015 at 15:26, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote: On 4/15/2015 6:01 AM, Ross wrote: The issue is not with the licence. The current terms and conditions require permission to add data not owned by the contributor. This is incorrect. An appropriate license is sufficient. Some obviously appropriate licenses are CC0, PDDL, ODC-BY and the ODbL itself. The issue is that CC BY (and BY-SA) 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 require a form of attribution that is not practical for most map uses, so we need permission. This would have been true even without the license change, as we were never meeting the requirements of those versions of CC BY. We have permission for many Australian sources, and I believe for all CC BY Australian sources that were in use at the time of the license change. My question was does CC-BY 4.0 have the same issue? Could CC-BY 4.0 data be included in OSM. Secondly, what specific permission do we need to include CC-BY 3.0 or 4.0 data in OSM? Do we essentially need the data supplier to agree to CC0 plus attribution in some specific form requested by OSMF? Is there a sample legal agreement or text for this? The release of government spatial data in Australia is continuing to expand to more and more agencies who are releasing under CC-BY, and it would be great if we had an OSMF approved license agreement or such we can present to these agencies so that hopefully these CC-BY datasets can be potentially used in some form in OSM. ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [talk-au] OSM people in ACT
Hi Kristy, I am not in ACT (Tassie based) but I would agree with all of the below as well as an open portal site where folks can download open data. http://listdata.thelist.tas.gov.au/opendata/ Specifically, it would great if agencies explicitly mentioned in their licencing or use documentation that the data is available(or not) for use under OSM Open Database Licence http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Database_License Cheers - Phil -Original Message- From: Ross [mailto:i...@4x4falcon.com] Sent: Tuesday, 5 May 2015 4:56 PM To: Kristy Van Putten; talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [talk-au] OSM people in ACT Hi Kristy, I'm not in the ACT but the following would be nice data to add and could be done by anyone if licenced appropriately. Addresses In a ESRI shape file or osm file geocoded like the Vic, Tas and Qld. Victorian and Tasmanian are the best examples have a look at thelist.tas.gov.au or data.vic.gov.au Building outlines. In an ESRI shape file or osm file geocoded like the Launceston and Glenorchy City Council data on thelist.tas.gov.au also. Road centerlines with names. As a wms layer same as at thelist.tas.gov.au This is not overly necessary as most of the names can be deduced from the address data. Just sometimes there is short streets where there is no actual property with an address so it can be looked up. Also where one road changes names partway along the road with no discernable intersection. Cheers Ross On 05/05/15 16:11, Kristy Van Putten wrote: Hi All, I am searching for active OSM contributors in ACT, if you are one please email me or contact me via my mobile. I am interested to get your thoughts on the current state of OSM in ACT and if there is any aspect the government can assist in. Cheers Kristy Van Putten kristy.vanput...@gmail.com 0414844825 ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2015.0.5941 / Virus Database: 4339/9697 - Release Date: 05/04/15 - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2015.0.5941 / Virus Database: 4339/9697 - Release Date: 05/04/15 ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [Talk-at] Wie Katastralgemeinden handhaben? (geoeki)
Danke für all die Rückmeldungen! Ich bin mit Geodatenbanken vertraut, darum hat es mich als OSM Neuling gewundert, dass es selbst für Ö alleine keine einheitlichen Hierarchien/Standards gibt (International ohnehin nicht bewältigbar) Was mMn auch noch für add:street sprechen würde: die Straßen in besagten Katastralgemeinden tragen oft deren Namen (z.B. heißt die Straße in Preinreichs auch Preinreichs). Habe jetzt aber alle meine addr:street tags auf addr:place geändert wo erforderlich (geht mit JOSM ja sehr einfach nachträglich). Schöne Grüße, -- Ekrem Canli, MSc Universitätsassistent (prae doc) Institut für Geographie und Regionalforschung Universität Wien Universitätsstrasse 7 (C416) 1010 Wien Tel: (+43) 1 4277 48654 Mobil: (+43) 680 2114451 Fax: (+43) 01 4277 8 48654 Post Manager ID: Ekrem.Canli ekrem.ca...@univie.ac.at http://geomorph.univie.ac.at/ ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
Re: [Talk-it] natural=spring oppure amenity=drinking_water ?
2015-05-05 1:22 GMT+02:00 mbranco2 mbran...@gmail.com: Provo a dire la mia basandomi sulla mia esperienza di escursionista più che quella di mappatore OSM (sono ancora novizio a riguardo) : - drinking_water = yes ritengo sia applicabile solo a manufatti dell'uomo collegati ad un acquedotto, quindi in un circuito chiuso, garantito e mantenuto. Questi manufatti sono praticamente presenti solo nei centri abitati: se è una fontanella, già taggata come amenity=drinking_water, è superfluo. si, è superfluo per amenity=drinking_water e no, lo userei anche per fonti naturali. drinking_water=yes è un tag che dice che l'acqua è potabile. Se lo è d'avvero non lo puoi sapere, perché in OSM tutti possono inserire tutto, e perché non si vede la maggiorpare delle possibili inquinamenti. La mappe ti aiuta a trovare una possibile fonte di acqua potabile, poi, una volta arrivato lì, sta a te di decidere se lo vuoi bere d'avvero o no. - Alle sorgenti naturali (natural=spring) non lo applicherei mai, perchè la potabilità non è garantita. L'inquinamento di una sorgente naturale può avere sia cause artificiali (falde inquinate da qualsiasi agente chimico, tipicamente in zone abitate ed industrializzate) sia cause naturali (vedi well contamination in wikipedia [1]). Ma anche dove la potabilità dell'acqua dovrebbe essere assicurata (per esempio su tutte le Alpi, oltre la quota degli alpeggi, dove in effetti ho sempre bevuto da sorgenti naturali), non si può sapere se per es. un animale poco prima non l'abbia (momentaneamente) inquinata. lo stesso discorso vale anche per una fontanella, potrebbe esser stata inquinata. Ciao, Martin ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[OSM-talk-nl] Missing Maps in het GeoFort, 4 juni 2015
Hallo allemaal, Op donderdag 4 juni 2015 van 14:00 tot 17:00 wordt er op het GeoFort een Missing Maps event georganiseerd door JongGeo. Toegang is gratis, als je meedoet aan de BBQ achteraf wordt een kleine bijdrage gevraagd. Voor vervoer vanaf station Geldermalsen kan gezorgd worden. Meer informatie en aanmelden kan hier: http://jonggeo.nl/missing-maps/ De inzet van het HOT in Nepal toont aan dat goede kaarten voor kwetsbare gebieden onverminderd belangrijk zijn. In het bijzonder hopen we ook dat een aantal ervaren mappers bereid is om nieuwelingen bij te staan. Voor vragen kun je terecht bij jongge...@gmail.com Tot 4 juni! Namens JongGeo Rob Geldhof ___ Talk-nl mailing list Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nl
Re: [OSM-talk] Using OSM on Wikitravel
On 05.05.2015 at 20:36 Andy Mabbett wrote: I'd be inclined to read up on the history of WikiTravel, before you go any further. I very much agree with Andy! WikiTravel is held by a commercial company with commercial interests. IMHO they acted clearly against the spirit of FLOSS in the past (e.g. by criminal complaint against some active persons not willing to act in their commercial interests). This caused a big part of the active contributors and admins to leave the project. These persons then founded ... You might also like to look at WikiVoyage: ... WikiVoyage as a fork which is accepted as a sister project by the Wikimedia Foundation. So if you are interested to support a project, please support WikiVoyage and not WikiTravel. BTW: Wikitravel is almost dead after a lot of contributors and admins left the project: there are only a few update and new articles in opposite to WikiVoyage. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikitravel= includes some details about the reason for the fork https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikivoyage Just my 2 cents, Michael. FYI: I'm not active in WikiVoyage nor in WikiTravel although I'm active in Wikipedia. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-cz] Bordel
Ahoj, Dne 5.5.2015 v 21:37 Petr Vejsada napsal(a): Ahoj, Dne Út 5. května 2015 13:49:36, Martin Švec - OSM napsal(a): Petře, můžeš vytáhnout něco jako SELECT changeset_id, user, COUNT(sirotci) ... GROUP BY changeset_id v kterém uzly osiřely? Namátkou to vypadá jen na pár changesetů. Rád bych vyloučil chybu v Traceru. já nemám historii, takže nemůžu nalézt changeset, ve kterém uzly osiřely, ale s vysokou pravděpodobností to bude ten changeset poslední. Ledaže by někdo tyto sirotky editoval; těžko. Přikládám group-by changeset i group-by user. sarkasmVýsledek asi málokoho překvapí/sarkasm. :-)) Díky, mrknu na to, příležitostně. Vidím tam i sebe, třeba něco zjistím z logů. Nepamatuju si, že by mi JOSM v posledních měsících křupnul při uploadu. Btw, nedávno jsem při nahrávání LPISu narazil na zajímavou haluz -- v changesetu se mi náhodně zdvojily cesty LPIS polí. Duplikáty měly stejné tagy a sdílely všechny svoje uzly. Jako kdyby JOSM nahrál část nových cest a relací dvakrát za sebou. Objevil jsem je až za měsíc v Osmose, byl to jeden konkrétní changeset. Tracer to (doufám) udělat nemohl, to bych hned viděl, dvojitá pole měla v JOSM tmavší barvu. Tohle se občas, ale opravdu jen občas stane. Nejsem si úplně jist, zda je to softwarem nebo člověkem. Spíš to přisuzuji sobě. Nicméně - pokud jsou oba polygony naprosto stejné, JOSM, doufám, že vždy, zařve. Stalo se mi ovšem i to, že nebyly naprosto stejné. Sdílely třeba všechny uzly až na jeden. To může IMO vzniknout tak, že když se tracuje podruhé, je to jiná situace - na daném místě už landuse je. Já podezírám upload changesetu do OSM. Ty cesty a relace byly _naprosto_ identické, proto je taky našlo Osmose. JOSM validace nic nehlásila, to bych ven nepustil, a trasované polygony vizuálně hlídám jak jen to jde. Každopádně je dobré se občas mrknout do Osmose na svoje chyby. ;-)) Martin Co se týká povšimnutí si duplicity, tak nevím, o jaké tmavší barvě to píšeš - to asi hodně závisí na nastavení JOSM. Mám tu skript, který umí najít duplicity či téměř duplicity z LPIS, tak jsem ho teď pustil, ono to bude nějakou dobu chroupat. -- Petr Martin Dne 5.5.2015 v 6:56 Marián Kyral napsal(a): Ahoj, můžeš udělat nějakou statistiku? Stáří, changesety, uživatelé? Co jsem tak namátkou prošel, všechno to byly uzly staré dva měsíce od jednoho uživatele. Možná nějaký dočasný problém. Ať už JOSM nebo OSM API? Marián -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Petr Vejsada o...@propsychology.cz Komu: talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Datum: 5. 5. 2015 2:42:16 Předmět: [Talk-cz] Bordel Ahoj, právě mažu přes 200 tisíc osiřelých uzlů. Wtf? http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30794706 -- p ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-cz] weeklyOSM CZ - Nepál
Zapojují se lidé z celého světa, primárně se mapy tvoří ze satelitních snímků. O Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Teamu jsem psal před rokem a půl v souvislosti s tajfunem na Filipínách, viz https://www.abclinuxu.cz/blog/proste_blog/2013/11/hotties-on-philippines-aneb-vime-kde-to-zije-2 Ve zkratce: člověk, který má účet na OSM, přijde na tasking manager - http://tasks.hotosm.org/ , kde se přihlásí se svým OSM účtem, vybere si podle svých znalostí úkol a podle instrukcí se dá do práce. To se dělá tak, že si vybere políčko, které chce zmapovat, klikne na něj a následně potvrdí přes Start mapping. A následně si oblast dle instrukcí stáhne do editoru (JOSM, iD, ...) a dělá co je v instrukcích (někde chtějí jenom budovy, někde jenom silnice, někde obojí, někde zase něco úplně jiného, ...). __ Od: Ladislav Nesnera nesn...@email.cz Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Datum: 05.05.2015 22:13 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] weeklyOSM CZ - Nepál Díky za překlad. To zapojení se je o týmu na místě, nebo se tu nějaká vzdálená možnost pomoci? (např. jako u projektu, který dle satelitních snímků mapuje minová pole) On 05/05/15 18:16, TK wrote: CZ překlad mimořádné zprávy z weeklyOSM: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/cz/archives/3436 Je hodně cest jak se zapojit s pomocí... ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz -- ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
[Talk-it] Comune di milano usa mappa osm per il routing
Vista la lentezza del sito non so se sia positivo... :-( http://www.muoversi.milano.it/ ciao maxx ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [OSM-talk] Overpass Quotas
Dear all, the last mail needs some more clarification. While I appreaciate that quite a lot of people care for not overusing the server, they are not the ones I have meant with clumsy clients. I fear it is quite a common problem and probably has a name: those who care about usage policies restrict themselves even more, but it doesn't help, because the problem comes from people that don't care or don't understand that they cause trouble. In other words: if you read this message then you don't contribute to congestion. Hence, if you have never seen a HTTP 429 Too much requests message, then your usage of overpass-api.de is perfectly fine. Please carry on and don't mind. Even if you have seen every now and then (as a hint: in less than 20 percent of all requests) a HTTP 429 then just relax a little bit, try to move long running requests (beyond 180 seconds, if any) off peak times (the time from UTC 12:00 to UTC 22:00 is more busy than the rest). And still everything is fine, even if you cannot move out of peak times. The server will not keep any record after rejection, and you will be treated after a few minutes as if you never have been involved in a HTTP 429 request. You should be only concerned if you find yourself on this short list of blocked IP addresses: 5.9.65.X 104.47.142.X 104.40.194.X 167.114.116.0/22 58.51.144.X 58.51.144.Y 54.78.255.X 54.247.44.X The next risk candidates are: 188.166.8.X 194.33.69.X A general misbehaving group of clients has been identified by sending the user request Only a test!. While I appreciate to send a self-chosen user agent, I have difficulties to derive a point of contact from that specific user agent. Once again: In all other cases, your usage of overpass-api.de is responsible and perfectly fine. For the curious, some more data: 01/Apr/2015 111710 67894 700976 488641 38386 02/Apr/2015 125437 73602.1 774208 506222 36288 03/Apr/2015 111768 66832.3 821650 495482 35969 04/Apr/2015 119659 49824.3 906004 459878 32267 05/Apr/2015 106234 45427.5 881590 462305 33588 06/Apr/2015 83007.5 43324.7 930086 505258 32662 07/Apr/2015 100788 42118.3 936754 511573 33880 08/Apr/2015 87590.3 40828.3 788823 474827 33610 09/Apr/2015 112620 37723.3 663166 450491 31912 10/Apr/2015 114220 37376.3 665173 465647 30522 11/Apr/2015 69314.6 26770 661636 439874 28347 12/Apr/2015 113752 36699.7 631125 469711 30236 13/Apr/2015 67609.4 30192.6 742857 475160 33531 14/Apr/2015 47800.8 26262.2 732373 456884 31838 15/Apr/2015 86428.3 30434.3 733738 484012 32638 16/Apr/2015 94440.9 28273.7 783472 466555 32041 17/Apr/2015 74105.2 26220 829937 471074 30380 18/Apr/2015 63287.7 16449.5 851242 460553 27105 19/Apr/2015 87040.5 20821.3 775956 471591 30032 20/Apr/2015 71236.3 28174.4 775381 471193 31782 21/Apr/2015 74426.7 27312.3 805662 423813 30961 22/Apr/2015 76482.8 32474.2 776979 458964 30663 23/Apr/2015 63931 30986 779185 400018 29209 24/Apr/2015 65186.2 29074.9 713110 414088 30181 25/Apr/2015 63562 20196.7 604212 355809 28733 26/Apr/2015 61562.2 22193.2 600918 362236 29523 27/Apr/2015 95413.6 33839.2 627806 407742 32568 28/Apr/2015 71292.1 30761 678194 411622 32213 29/Apr/2015 108186 29082.4 692393 416049 30986 30/Apr/2015 126114 28901.1 857178 397983 29670 The second column is the total amount of data in megabytes by day. The third column is the total amount of data in megabytes per day for all except the 30 heaviest users. You can notice that on most days these 30 heaviest users consume 50% to 80% of all data. In a similar manner, the fourth and fifth column list the number of requests. Again, heavy users are quite dominant. The last column is the number of unique IP addresses the server has seen that day. The full diagram has more columns to tell apart the heaviest user, the 3 heaviest users, and the 10 heaviest users. However, the tendence remains the same that very few (less than 1 in 1000 users) consume more than 50% of the resources. So if you are not in this top-30-list, then your usage of overpass-api.de is perfectly fine. Happy querying, Roland ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-cz] Restrukturalizace Wiki
Dne 5.5.2015 v 12:29 Dalibor Jelínek napsal(a): Ahoj, nechcete nekdo prispet do debaty tady? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category_talk:Czech_Documentation A zastat se kategorie, ktera sdruzuje vsechny stranky v ceskem jazyce? Prilis aktivni uzvatel se rozhodl, ze je tahle kategorie pro nas zbytecna a navic ma podle vsehov planu prejmenovavat ceske stranky, ktere se nejmenuji podle tvaru Cs:*. Predem dekuji, Dalibor Cus, na cs: nevidim nic spatnyho, co vidim jako horsi je, ze wiki nerespektuje lang poslanej prohlizecem, takze at tam vleze kdo tam vleze, stejne dycky dostane en verzi. ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-cz] weeklyOSM CZ - Nepál
Díky za překlad. To zapojení se je o týmu na místě, nebo se tu nějaká vzdálená možnost pomoci? (např. jako u projektu, který dle satelitních snímků mapuje minová pole) On 05/05/15 18:16, TK wrote: CZ překlad mimořádné zprávy z weeklyOSM: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/cz/archives/3436 Je hodně cest jak se zapojit s pomocí... ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-cz] Bordel
Dne 5.5.2015 v 22:03 Martin Švec - OSM napsal(a): Ahoj, Dne 5.5.2015 v 21:37 Petr Vejsada napsal(a): Ahoj, Dne Út 5. května 2015 13:49:36, Martin Švec - OSM napsal(a): Petře, můžeš vytáhnout něco jako SELECT changeset_id, user, COUNT(sirotci) ... GROUP BY changeset_id v kterém uzly osiřely? Namátkou to vypadá jen na pár changesetů. Rád bych vyloučil chybu v Traceru. já nemám historii, takže nemůžu nalézt changeset, ve kterém uzly osiřely, ale s vysokou pravděpodobností to bude ten changeset poslední. Ledaže by někdo tyto sirotky editoval; těžko. Přikládám group-by changeset i group-by user. sarkasmVýsledek asi málokoho překvapí/sarkasm. :-)) Díky, mrknu na to, příležitostně. Vidím tam i sebe, třeba něco zjistím z logů. Nepamatuju si, že by mi JOSM v posledních měsících křupnul při uploadu. Btw, nedávno jsem při nahrávání LPISu narazil na zajímavou haluz -- v changesetu se mi náhodně zdvojily cesty LPIS polí. Duplikáty měly stejné tagy a sdílely všechny svoje uzly. Jako kdyby JOSM nahrál část nových cest a relací dvakrát za sebou. Objevil jsem je až za měsíc v Osmose, byl to jeden konkrétní changeset. Tracer to (doufám) udělat nemohl, to bych hned viděl, dvojitá pole měla v JOSM tmavší barvu. Tohle se občas, ale opravdu jen občas stane. Nejsem si úplně jist, zda je to softwarem nebo člověkem. Spíš to přisuzuji sobě. Nicméně - pokud jsou oba polygony naprosto stejné, JOSM, doufám, že vždy, zařve. Stalo se mi ovšem i to, že nebyly naprosto stejné. Sdílely třeba všechny uzly až na jeden. To může IMO vzniknout tak, že když se tracuje podruhé, je to jiná situace - na daném místě už landuse je. Já podezírám upload changesetu do OSM. Ty cesty a relace byly _naprosto_ identické, proto je taky našlo Osmose. JOSM validace nic nehlásila, to bych ven nepustil, a trasované polygony vizuálně hlídám jak jen to jde. Každopádně je dobré se občas mrknout do Osmose na svoje chyby. ;-)) Martin Cus, ad BTW: nedavno sem nekoho pres web upozornoval na to, ze se mu povedlo zdvojit cesty (uzly byly totozny, jen pres ne vedla jak puvodni, nerozdelena way, tak nova, rozdelena), zeby nejakej bug v JOSM? Vyrabel rychlostni omezeni a pritom zjevne way rozdeloval, ale jak se u to povedlo takhle ... . Co se týká povšimnutí si duplicity, tak nevím, o jaké tmavší barvě to píšeš - to asi hodně závisí na nastavení JOSM. Mám tu skript, který umí najít duplicity či téměř duplicity z LPIS, tak jsem ho teď pustil, ono to bude nějakou dobu chroupat. -- Petr Martin Dne 5.5.2015 v 6:56 Marián Kyral napsal(a): Ahoj, můžeš udělat nějakou statistiku? Stáří, changesety, uživatelé? Co jsem tak namátkou prošel, všechno to byly uzly staré dva měsíce od jednoho uživatele. Možná nějaký dočasný problém. Ať už JOSM nebo OSM API? Marián -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Petr Vejsadao...@propsychology.cz Komu:talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Datum: 5. 5. 2015 2:42:16 Předmět: [Talk-cz] Bordel Ahoj, právě mažu přes 200 tisíc osiřelých uzlů. Wtf? http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30794706 -- p ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Démo Carnet de rando sur la crête des Vosges
Salut Yves, Je te reponds tres rapidement pour l instant, je suis a l etranger, je reviens dans 10 a 15 jours. J ai continue a travailler sur le projet mais pas pris le temps de mettre a disposition. Mais tu peux t attendre a avoir bientot la chaine Trace gpx en entree, generation automatique des cadres - deja code -, generation automatique des cartes - le code deja mis a disposition -, generation automatique du pdf - au stade de test/demo de faisabilite -. Pour la derniere etape, j ai finalement choisi un passage par Latex. Tout n est pas code, juste quelques tests de demo, mais ca a l air de marcher et je compte finir le travail a mon retour. Pour avoir la trace gps sur les cartes, il suffit d ajouter l information de l ouvrir dans le script fourni a Maperitive, juste copier et adapter la ligne d ouverture des donnees OSM qui va bien. Voila voila, JB. Le 05.05.2015 13:59, Yves Pratter a écrit : J'ai oublié un pré-requis de taille : les règles de rendu R25 [3] de JB ;-) Concernant la création du pdf final, tu le fais actuellement à la main avec un traitement de texte ? -- Yves Comment fonctionne CarnetRando ? * Pré-requis : * PC sous windows ça semble fonctionner sous MacOS ou Linux : quelqu'un utilise l'un de ces environnement ? * Python * Maperitive [1] * Java + osmosis [2] * Modèle Numérique de Terrain (SRTMV3R3) : Faut-il le télécharger manuellement ou Maperitive s'en charge ? ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr [4] Links: -- [1] http://maperitive.net/ [2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osmosis/Installation [3] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/R25_Maperitive_style [4] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [Talk-it] OsmAnd 2.0 disponibile
Si ho visto, grazie... Per curiosità, su che dispositivi lo usate e relativa durata della batteria in situazioni tipo mtb od escursionismo, saluti. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/OsmAnd-2-0-disponibile-tp5842996p5843410.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [OSM-talk] Using OSM on Wikitravel
I'd be inclined to read up on the history of WikiTravel, before you go any further. You might also like to look at WikiVoyage: https://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Wikivoyage:Cooperating_with_OpenStreetMap http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Collaboration_with_Wikivoyage On 5 May 2015 at 17:25, Andrew Wiseman awise...@gmail.com wrote: I think this might be an interesting use for OSM -- Wikitravel is a wiki for travel tips (hence the name) and lacks maps on most pages! Maybe we could somehow get connected with them to include maps for all the places, states, etc. Might also show new people about OSM too. I filed a feature request with them but maybe somebody else knows them. http://wikitravel.org/ http://wikitravel.org/shared/Tech:Adding_maps_to_articles Andrew -- 600,000 DC residents don't have a vote in Congress -- http://www.dcvote.org/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-it] ferrovia mineraria o no ?
2015-05-05 9:09 GMT+02:00 Alessandro Chiostri alech.b...@gmail.com: Nel museo minerario di Abbadia San Salvatore è stato realizzato un percorso su treno decauville rivolto ai visitatori: Direi che può essere utile usage=tourism http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:usage Se lo scartamento è ridotto, si può indicare il valore con gauge e indicare la ferrovia come railway=narrow_gauge AnyFile ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] OsmAnd 2.0 disponibile
Su GT-7500 circa 6 ore con schermo spento o che si accende automaticamente quando si deve svoltare ma spesso lo uso solo per registrare la traccia e guardare la mappa ogni tanto. Il 05/05/2015 20:12, ramon [via GIS] ha scritto: Si ho visto, grazie... Per curiosità, su che dispositivi lo usate e relativa durata della batteria in situazioni tipo mtb od escursionismo, saluti. If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/OsmAnd-2-0-disponibile-tp5842996p5843410.html To unsubscribe from OsmAnd 2.0 disponibile, click here http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=5842996code=bWlyY296b3J6b0BpbndpbmQuaXR8NTg0Mjk5NnwtODczMDE0MjQw. NAML http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewerid=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.namlbase=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespacebreadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml -- Mi piacciono Osmand.net e Openstreetmap.org mircozo...@pec.it -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/OsmAnd-2-0-disponibile-tp5842996p5843412.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[talk-ph] Remote mapping for health facility research
Dear everyone, Just to inform you that this activity has started. For details read below: Overview: World Health Organization (WHO) is conducting a research on the accessibility of health care facilities in Luzon using the tool AcessMod . They intend to use OpenStreetMap road and river network dataset for the above areas as input to their accessibility analysis. * Areas to cover - Regions I, II, III, IV-A, V, CAR and NCR (33 provinces plus NCR) * Mapping priorities - Roads ( trunk, primary, secondary and tertiary), ferry routes and river network * Level of detail - 1:50K to 1:20K or zoom levels 13-15 * Period of mapping - May 2015 Mappers involved: maning, GOwin, schadow1, feyeandal, Rally, jenjereren, G-eMapper, Ayoo, Hayat Tib Ben Hammadi Coordination and monitoring: To monitor and coordinate the mapping activity, we created a Tasking Manager instance based on HOT's Tasking Manager. Current changeest tags we are using are the following: #MCP Luzon River mapping #MCP Luzon Road mapping As a basic principle, we will respect the existing data in OSM, if you have concerns with the edits of the above users in relation to this activity, please let us know. At the end of the mapping activity, we hope to intend stats on the results. Thanks! On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:06 PM, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote: Dear everyone, There is a potential paid remote mapping work request. Basically, an international humanitarian agency is doing a research work on the accessibility of health care facilities in selected regions in Luzon (Regions I, II, III, IV-A, V, CAR and NCR). They are looking for the best available road and river network dataset for the above areas as input to their accessibility analysis. Naturally, OSM comes to mind ;). For this paid work, they are looking for experienced mappers to do remote mapping and data quality check for the month of May 2015. My personal OSM agenda, is that this will allow us to improve coverage in many parts of Northern Luzon. We are still establishing the appropriate workflow. Once remote mapping comes into full swing, we will inform the community of the workflow to ensure that this will not affect any existing mapping activities by volunteers in the above areas. If you are interested to be part of the team, send me a message offlist. If there are any reservations by the community for this kind of paid mapping activity let's also discuss here. -- cheers, maning -- Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ -- -- cheers, maning -- Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ http://twitter.com/maningsambale -- ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] May Meeting (Disabilty Kurb Project)
I was planning to do a bit in the Blackwell / Burcot areas, assuming I get around to doing some tracing before Thursday. Cheers Andy From: Rob Nickerson [mailto:rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com] Sent: 02 May 2015 19:15 To: Mark Croft Cc: talk-gb-westmidlands Subject: Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] May Meeting (Disabilty Kurb Project) Sounds like an interesting project. Hopefully we'll see you in Bromsgrove on Thursday to discuss this in more detail. Speaking of which does anyone know what the plan is for Bromsgrove. Is there any priority areas that we should focus on or shall I just pick something and meet you in the pub afterwards? Rob On 1 May 2015 at 18:01, Mark Croft mark.croft@gmail.com wrote: Hi The group has been out to bewdley and did a test run of finding curbs. I was not able to join in cos of health problems felling worn out with weather n hayfever. I should really have a go on my own here around my town in redditch. got a stack of photos and a spreadsheet of gps points where there good curbs and so reasonable ones that either steep and hard work to push a manual wheelchair up and others with a reasonable size drop down to the path/road etc etc I need to get some clarification on all the different issues with curbs and come up with some form of coding and label system. first beta version of the map attached (not sure its openstreetmap) i want to know to make a seperate layer of points on top of openstreetmap? does this need to done on custom webpage and having a host etc? I not done any internet programming yet would like the challange but also very time limited too get some sort of beat/demo copy of at least a paper copy of the map of bewdley. Maybe we have a go around bromsgrove on thursday? Is taking photos with embedded gps position enough? I have a friend that can offer me some free website space? ( i am involved in another project called Disability Action Redditch and need to redo there website and i am hoping to put this Curb/Kurb project on there for now - so that should be up soon or at least a frontpage saying that DAR website going live in june/july 2015) mark croft redditch On 15 April 2015 at 19:42, Brian Prangle bpran...@gmail.com wrote: A quick reminder that we're due to meet on Thurs 7 May (Election Night!). Thise of us who were at the April meeting decided from our list on Bromsgrove ( mainly to support mark a new mapper). Pub is the Golden Cross ( A Wetherspoons ) which might be a challenge as it wasn't on the map when we decided Regards Brian ___ Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands ___ Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands ___ Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands
Re: [Talk-dk] Strømningsretningen stemmer ikke!
Det er så ikke en angivelse man skal regne for sandheden http://opentopomap.org/#map=14/56.36822/10.43452 , her kan der ses et vandløb, hvor vandet strømmer i begge retninger. Det kunne se ud til, at det er GeoDanmark datasættet der bruges, for det er samme fejl som findes i det. Venlig hilsen Allan Gyldendal Frederiksen GIS-koordinator Syddjurs Kommune, Digitalisering Direkte +4587535261 Mobil +4530924749 a...@syddjurs.dk Fra: Michael Andersen [mailto:hj...@milvus.dk] Sendt: 5. maj 2015 12:04 Til: OpenStreetMap Denmark Emne: Re: [Talk-dk] Strømningsretningen stemmer ikke! Jeg faldt lige over OpenTopoMaphttp://opentopomap.org/#map=15/55.81134/12.25259 hvor der vitterligt er pile der angiver strømmens retning i vandløb. God fornøjelse. Tirsdag den 17. marts 2015 00:18:07 skrev Michael Andersen: Åh, ok. Det har du ret i. Jeg spurgte lige på IRC og der er tilsyneladende ikke nogen normale OSM baserede kort der angiver hvilken retning vandløb strømmer. Så enten må enten må man gætte sig til det eller skabe sit eget kort. Mandag den 16. marts 2015 23:48:04 skrev Uffe Kousgaard: Hej, Jeg taler om at vandet på den strækning løber mod nord ude i virkeligheden. Det var den information Niels Elgaard søgte. Og jeg ved godt, at liniestykker har en digitaliseringsretning. Men retningen fremgår ikke af det normale OSM kort. hilsen Uffe Michael Andersen wrote: Hej Uffe Nej, alle liniestykker i databasen har en retning og vandløb strømmer blot i samme retning som liniestykket. Mandag den 16. marts 2015 23:22:34 skrev Uffe Kousgaard: Det løber nordpå, på den strækning. Skal man sætte oneway før retningen kan ses på kortet? mvh Uffe Kousgaard Niels Elgaard Larsen wrote: Men der er stadig vandløb, som jeg ikke har fundet ud af, fx Tokkerup Å: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32057465 ___ Talk-dk mailing list Talk-dk@openstreetmap.orgmailto:Talk-dk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-dk ___ Talk-dk mailing list Talk-dk@openstreetmap.orgmailto:Talk-dk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-dk ___ Talk-dk mailing list Talk-dk@openstreetmap.orgmailto:Talk-dk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-dk ___ Talk-dk mailing list Talk-dk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-dk
[Talk-lv] Rīgas adrešu punktu imports no opendata.riga.lv
Sveiki, Latvijas OpenStreetMap kopiena! Vēlētos uzsākt atklātu diskusiju par lielo Rīgas adrešu punktu importu no opendata.riga.lv datiem. Kā jūs varētu pamanīt, pēdējas divās nedēļās OSM kartē Rīgas robežās dažas reizes parādījās un pazuda jaunie adrešu punkti. Tas bija divu nesekmīgu adrešu importu rezultāts. Respektīvi: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30315170 un https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30528590 . Abas izmaiņu kopas bija neveiksmīgas dažu iemeslu dēļ un bija atsauktas (reverted). Kā jūs zināt no talk-lv listes, nesen Rīgas pašvaldība atvēra dažus pašvaldības datus un izlika tos zem ODC-By licenci https://opendata.riga.lv/ tīmekļa portālā. Viena no interesantam datu kopām ir Rīgas adrešu punkti - kas arī bija divas reizes nesekmīgi importēti. Lai nākotnē nebūtu nekādu pārpratumu, pievadāju apspriest šo importu. * Dati Pieejamā datu kopa ar Rīgas adrešu punktiem. Katram ierakstām ir noteiktas LKS-92 ģeogrāfiskas koordinātes, ielas nosaukums un mājas numurs. Principā, tā ir minimāla nepieciešama informācija adrešu punktiem OSM datubāzē. Datu kopā ir ~37 tukst. adreses. Daļēji tā pārklājas ar OSM jau esošām adresēm (~15 tukst. adreses), bet ~22 tukst. adreses (galvenokārt maz apsekotos rajonos) varētu būt importētas OSM datu bāzē. * Importa problēmas un to pievadātais risinājums 1) Lielais datu pārklājums (~15/37). Problēma bija noteikta pirmā neveiksmīga importā. Dublējošie dati būtiski pasliktinās OSM datu lietojamību un nav pieļaujami. Lai to atrisinātu es izguvu visas OSM esošas Rīgas adreses (adrešu punktus OSM punktiem, un adreses ēkām (building=*) OSM līnijām un relacijām). Pēc tām, no opendata.riga.lv datu kopas bija izņemtas visas adreses, kas jau ir OSM, un tika iegūta rezultējoša kopa ar ~22 tukst. adrešu punktiem, kas vēl nav OSM, vai kuriem OSM adrese atšķiras no opendata.riga.lv. 2) Dažreiz ielas nosaukums opendata.riga.lv nesakrīt ar ielas nosaukumu OSM. Visvairāk tas ir pamanīts visādām numurētām līnijām. Tā, opendata.riga.lv līnijas ir rakstītas kā Čiekurkalna 1.līnija, bet OSM vēsturiski vai citu apsvērumu dēļ ir pieņemts rakstīt ar atstarpi pēc punkta: Čiekurkalna 1. līnija. Apstrādājot datus otrām importam tas tika ņemts vērā un visas numurētas ielas bija attiecīgi konvertētas, lai būtu atstarpe pēc punktā, kā tas ir pieņemts (?) Latvijas OSM kopienā. 2a) Pēc otrā neveiksmīga importa atklājas, ka dažviet OSM ielas nosaukumi ir rakstīti ar kļūdu (galvenokārt gramatiskas kļūdas), bet tos būs iespējams izmainīt pēc importa apskatot atklātos validatoros, kur jauniem adrešu punktiem neatbilst esošie ielas nosaukumi. Pie reizes arī būs redzams, kuras ielas nosaukumi nav OSM Rīgas kartē, un kur ir nepieciešama apsekošana un ielu nosaukumu precizēšana. 3) Dažreiz OSM (arī mājas numura plāksnītes) adreses pieraksts varētu atšķirties no opendata.riga.lv pierakstiem. Piemēram 70 k-6 un 70/6. Tādu adrešu punktu ir pietiekami maz, bet tomēr ir. Kā atrisināt šo kļūdu man pagaidām nav piedāvājumu. Tas arī ir datu divdabība, jo numura plāksnīte atšķīrās no adrešu kataloga datiem, bet principā tam nav jābūt... Pēc importa būs divi adrešu punkti, viens no apsekošanas, otrs no kataloga. 4) Ja OSM kartē esošas adreses ir ar kļūdu. Iepriekš veikta datu atlase neļaus izlabot šis kļūdas, jo adreses jau ir OSM, bet nepareizi izvietoti ģeogrāfiski. Jaunie adrešu punkti ar tādām adresēm netiks importētas, un vecas paliks savās vietās. Viena no manām idejām bija analizēt, cik tālu adreses punkts ir no OSM objekta, bet tas būs pietiekami grūti realizējams pie tik lielas datu kopas. Piedāvāju pieņemt, ka tādu objektu ir patiešam ļoti maz, un tas nepasliktinās kopēju datu kvalitāti OSM datubāzē. 5) Kļūdas opendata.riga.lv datos. Apskatot datus, atrādu kā dažreiz arī opendata.riga.lv ir kļūdas, kad mājas plāksnītes numurs nesakrīt ar kataloga numuru. Šeit varētu būt divi kļūdu veidi. 5a) Uz ēkas ir veca numura plāksnīte, bet kataloga ir pareiza adrese: ir vērts izveidot adreses punktu ar pareizu adresi. 5b) Ir kļūda opendata.riga.lv datos. Diemžēl tādas kļūdas nav iespējams pamanīt un izlabot. Pieņemsim kā tādu kļūdu ir ļoti-ļoti maz, un tie neietekmēs kopēju datu kvalitāti. 6) Importa pareiza dokumentēšana un apspriešana. Tā ir būtiska pašreizēja problēma, kuru ir jāatrisina. Būs nepieciešama palīdzība no lietotājiem, kas jau strādāja ar importu vadību. Būs nepieciešama palīdzība no Latvijas OSM kopienas par importa kvalitātes uzlabošanu! * Importa plusi un minusi ++ Būtiski tiks uzlabota kopēja adrešu situācija OSM Rīgā. Pašlaik adreses ir atzīmētas galvenokārt tikai Rīgas centrā un blīvi apdzīvotās apkaimēs. Ir atzīmētas mazāk nekā pusē no visam Rīgas adresēm (~15/37). + Būs atzīmētas adresēs slikti apsekotas Rīgas rajonos (galvenokārt mazmāju privātsektorā). Būs piešķirtas adreses objektiem iezīmētiem no satelīta attēla bez apsekošanas. + Adrešu reformas
Re: [talk-au] OSM people in ACT [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Hi Folks, If you have any specific legal questions re ODBL, the OpenStreetMap Foundation's License Working Group can be reached at le...@osmfoundation.org and will be glad to help. Cheers - Phil OSM mapper - tastrax Kiva Lender, Thin Green Line Supporter, Volunteer Mapper - Red Cross, Wildcare Volunteer -Original Message- From: simon.coste...@ga.gov.au [mailto:simon.coste...@ga.gov.au] Sent: Tuesday, 5 May 2015 7:12 PM To: kristy.vanput...@gmail.com Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [talk-au] OSM people in ACT [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Thanks Kristy, I would support the idea of discerning the difference between CCBY and ODBL. THe intent of the open data policy is to make data useable with minimal restriction, and ODBL seems to be an appropriate instrument for handling this in database format. CCBY seems ok for maps but not for databases. I got in touch with OSM contributor Michael Cleary last week who was visiting GA as part of the Power of Maps conference. He outlined pretty well what he sees the issues are viz ODBL vs CCBY4.0. I am beginning to get a clearer picture on what these issues are and am keen to get it resolved, but will need continued feedback from the OSM community on this. This is also worth bringing up in the Foundation Spatial Data Framework policy discussions which I am heavily involved in. FSDF also needs to consider the role of volunteered geographic information in the update of national foundation spatial datasets - so there is even greater imperative to have OSM involved in those discussions. The use cases included in the email trail are excellent examples of the need to get this sorted. Thanks, Simon Simon Costello Branch Head, National Location Information | EGD Management Environmental Geoscience Division | GEOSCIENCE AUSTRALIA Phone: +61 2 6249 9716tel:+61%202%206249%209716Fax: +61 2 6249 tel:+61%202%206249%20 Email: simon.coste...@ga.gov.aumailto:simon.coste...@ga.gov.auWeb: www.ga.gov.auhttp://www.ga.gov.au/ Cnr Jerrabomberra Avenue and Hindmarsh Drive Symonston ACT GPO Box 378 Canberra ACT 2601 Australiax-apple-data-detectors://3 Applying geoscience to Australia’s most important challenges On 5 May 2015, at 5:00 pm, kristy van putten kristy.vanput...@gmail.commailto:kristy.vanput...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Jason, This is a great tool! The majority of government is trying to move to an open license, with GA leading in the geospatial front. What we need to get our heads around is the difference between CCBY 4.0 and ODBL. Community outreach programs would be great, or even potentially working with spatial institutes such as SSSI to encourage OSM in schools. I will take a look at the import list and see whats happening around the world - your right this might shed a light on potential assistance. As Andrew just pointed out access to imagery would also be very beneficial, I will look into this a bit further and see what can be done there (specially ACT to start with). I will start to contact the super users in ACT. Cheers On Tue, 5 May 2015 at 16:44 Jason Ward jasonjwa...@gmail.commailto:jasonjwa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Kristy, Not a large userbase in the ACT and not all of them may subscribe to this list. To help you in your search the following link may prove useful (Suggest unticking Black, Red and Orange users in the top left corner for a closer measure of 'active' contributors) http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/oooc?zoom=11lat=-35.29175lon=149.17885layers=B00FTT While I don't represent the contributors in ACT it would be great if (the whole of) government was able to provide or make accessible data with suitable licence clearances for use in OSM. Despite that and noting the small contributor count in the region maybe more 'useful' would be the application of resources to help with the contribution of data OR some sort of government advocacy/community growth initiative with the long game being to build the local contributor base. To adapt a recent phrase from another list, OSM is a collection of on-the-ground observations and while there is a place for supply of government information, and notwithstanding your Indonesian HOT experience, your time would be well spent looking at some of the imports carried out in other parts of the world (some good, others less so), as well as subscribing to the @imports list (if you haven't done so) for a view into the workings OSM members apply to externally supplied information. Cheers, Jason M: 0438740049tel:0438740049 On 5 May 2015 at 16:11, Kristy Van Putten kristy.vanput...@gmail.commailto:kristy.vanput...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I am searching for active OSM contributors in ACT, if you are one please email me or contact me via my mobile. I am interested to get your thoughts on the current state of OSM in ACT and if there is any aspect the government can assist
Re: [Talk-cz] weeklyOSM CZ - Nepál
Jsem rád, že jsem se zeptal a ještě radši za odpověď. Díky! (y) On 05/05/15 22:22, xkomc...@centrum.cz wrote: Zapojují se lidé z celého světa, primárně se mapy tvoří ze satelitních snímků. O Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Teamu jsem psal před rokem a půl v souvislosti s tajfunem na Filipínách, viz https://www.abclinuxu.cz/blog/proste_blog/2013/11/hotties-on-philippines-aneb-vime-kde-to-zije-2 Ve zkratce: člověk, který má účet na OSM, přijde na tasking manager - http://tasks.hotosm.org/ , kde se přihlásí se svým OSM účtem, vybere si podle svých znalostí úkol a podle instrukcí se dá do práce. To se dělá tak, že si vybere políčko, které chce zmapovat, klikne na něj a následně potvrdí přes Start mapping. A následně si oblast dle instrukcí stáhne do editoru (JOSM, iD, ...) a dělá co je v instrukcích (někde chtějí jenom budovy, někde jenom silnice, někde obojí, někde zase něco úplně jiného, ...). __ Od: Ladislav Nesnera nesn...@email.cz Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Datum: 05.05.2015 22:13 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] weeklyOSM CZ - Nepál Díky za překlad. To zapojení se je o týmu na místě, nebo se tu nějaká vzdálená možnost pomoci? (např. jako u projektu, který dle satelitních snímků mapuje minová pole) On 05/05/15 18:16, TK wrote: CZ překlad mimořádné zprávy z weeklyOSM: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/cz/archives/3436 Je hodně cest jak se zapojit s pomocí... ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz -- ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [talk-au] OSM people in ACT [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
I've also asked on legal-talk to try to find out what extra permissions on top of CC-BY are needed for potential inclusion in OSM at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2015-May/008127.html On 5 May 2015 at 20:37, Phil (The Geek) Wyatt p...@wyatt-family.com wrote: Hi Folks, If you have any specific legal questions re ODBL, the OpenStreetMap Foundation's License Working Group can be reached at le...@osmfoundation.org and will be glad to help. Cheers - Phil OSM mapper - tastrax Kiva Lender, Thin Green Line Supporter, Volunteer Mapper - Red Cross, Wildcare Volunteer -Original Message- From: simon.coste...@ga.gov.au [mailto:simon.coste...@ga.gov.au] Sent: Tuesday, 5 May 2015 7:12 PM To: kristy.vanput...@gmail.com Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [talk-au] OSM people in ACT [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Thanks Kristy, I would support the idea of discerning the difference between CCBY and ODBL. THe intent of the open data policy is to make data useable with minimal restriction, and ODBL seems to be an appropriate instrument for handling this in database format. CCBY seems ok for maps but not for databases. I got in touch with OSM contributor Michael Cleary last week who was visiting GA as part of the Power of Maps conference. He outlined pretty well what he sees the issues are viz ODBL vs CCBY4.0. I am beginning to get a clearer picture on what these issues are and am keen to get it resolved, but will need continued feedback from the OSM community on this. This is also worth bringing up in the Foundation Spatial Data Framework policy discussions which I am heavily involved in. FSDF also needs to consider the role of volunteered geographic information in the update of national foundation spatial datasets - so there is even greater imperative to have OSM involved in those discussions. The use cases included in the email trail are excellent examples of the need to get this sorted. Thanks, Simon Simon Costello Branch Head, National Location Information | EGD Management Environmental Geoscience Division | GEOSCIENCE AUSTRALIA Phone: +61 2 6249 9716tel:+61%202%206249%209716Fax: +61 2 6249 tel:+61%202%206249%20 Email: simon.coste...@ga.gov.aumailto:simon.coste...@ga.gov.auWeb: www.ga.gov.auhttp://www.ga.gov.au/ Cnr Jerrabomberra Avenue and Hindmarsh Drive Symonston ACT GPO Box 378 Canberra ACT 2601 Australiax-apple-data-detectors://3 Applying geoscience to Australia’s most important challenges On 5 May 2015, at 5:00 pm, kristy van putten kristy.vanput...@gmail.commailto:kristy.vanput...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Jason, This is a great tool! The majority of government is trying to move to an open license, with GA leading in the geospatial front. What we need to get our heads around is the difference between CCBY 4.0 and ODBL. Community outreach programs would be great, or even potentially working with spatial institutes such as SSSI to encourage OSM in schools. I will take a look at the import list and see whats happening around the world - your right this might shed a light on potential assistance. As Andrew just pointed out access to imagery would also be very beneficial, I will look into this a bit further and see what can be done there (specially ACT to start with). I will start to contact the super users in ACT. Cheers On Tue, 5 May 2015 at 16:44 Jason Ward jasonjwa...@gmail.commailto:jasonjwa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Kristy, Not a large userbase in the ACT and not all of them may subscribe to this list. To help you in your search the following link may prove useful (Suggest unticking Black, Red and Orange users in the top left corner for a closer measure of 'active' contributors) http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/oooc?zoom=11lat=-35.29175lon=149.17885layers=B00FTT While I don't represent the contributors in ACT it would be great if (the whole of) government was able to provide or make accessible data with suitable licence clearances for use in OSM. Despite that and noting the small contributor count in the region maybe more 'useful' would be the application of resources to help with the contribution of data OR some sort of government advocacy/community growth initiative with the long game being to build the local contributor base. To adapt a recent phrase from another list, OSM is a collection of on-the-ground observations and while there is a place for supply of government information, and notwithstanding your Indonesian HOT experience, your time would be well spent looking at some of the imports carried out in other parts of the world (some good, others less so), as well as subscribing to the @imports list (if you haven't done so) for a view into the workings OSM members apply to externally supplied information. Cheers, Jason M:
[Talk-GB] ITO - OSM Analysis Updated with May 2015 OS data
Hello UK mappers, I’ve updated the ITO OSM Analysis with the new OS Locator data which has been released this month (May 2015). Many areas have had significant increases in the number of missing road names. Leeds has had the biggest increase of 35 more missing road names. Moray for example is now only 94.01% complete. http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/main http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/main Shaun ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [talk-au] OSM people in ACT [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Hi Folks, There are some sample letters available at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/GettingPermission I have sent one such email to the Tasmanian Government seeking permissions for any datasets on the Open Data Portal site. I will let you know what response I get. They may come back allowing only certain sets but I thought I may as well ask for the lot initially! Cheers - Phil -Original Message- From: Andrew Harvey [mailto:andrew.harv...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 5 May 2015 8:48 PM To: Phil (The Geek) Wyatt Cc: simon.coste...@ga.gov.au; kristy van putten; OSM Australian Talk List Subject: Re: [talk-au] OSM people in ACT [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] I've also asked on legal-talk to try to find out what extra permissions on top of CC-BY are needed for potential inclusion in OSM at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2015-May/008127.html On 5 May 2015 at 20:37, Phil (The Geek) Wyatt p...@wyatt-family.com wrote: Hi Folks, If you have any specific legal questions re ODBL, the OpenStreetMap Foundation's License Working Group can be reached at le...@osmfoundation.org and will be glad to help. Cheers - Phil OSM mapper - tastrax Kiva Lender, Thin Green Line Supporter, Volunteer Mapper - Red Cross, Wildcare Volunteer -Original Message- From: simon.coste...@ga.gov.au [mailto:simon.coste...@ga.gov.au] Sent: Tuesday, 5 May 2015 7:12 PM To: kristy.vanput...@gmail.com Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [talk-au] OSM people in ACT [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Thanks Kristy, I would support the idea of discerning the difference between CCBY and ODBL. THe intent of the open data policy is to make data useable with minimal restriction, and ODBL seems to be an appropriate instrument for handling this in database format. CCBY seems ok for maps but not for databases. I got in touch with OSM contributor Michael Cleary last week who was visiting GA as part of the Power of Maps conference. He outlined pretty well what he sees the issues are viz ODBL vs CCBY4.0. I am beginning to get a clearer picture on what these issues are and am keen to get it resolved, but will need continued feedback from the OSM community on this. This is also worth bringing up in the Foundation Spatial Data Framework policy discussions which I am heavily involved in. FSDF also needs to consider the role of volunteered geographic information in the update of national foundation spatial datasets - so there is even greater imperative to have OSM involved in those discussions. The use cases included in the email trail are excellent examples of the need to get this sorted. Thanks, Simon Simon Costello Branch Head, National Location Information | EGD Management Environmental Geoscience Division | GEOSCIENCE AUSTRALIA Phone: +61 2 6249 9716tel:+61%202%206249%209716Fax: +61 2 6249 tel:+61%202%206249%20 Email: simon.coste...@ga.gov.aumailto:simon.coste...@ga.gov.auWeb: www.ga.gov.auhttp://www.ga.gov.au/ Cnr Jerrabomberra Avenue and Hindmarsh Drive Symonston ACT GPO Box 378 Canberra ACT 2601 Australiax-apple-data-detectors://3 Applying geoscience to Australia’s most important challenges On 5 May 2015, at 5:00 pm, kristy van putten kristy.vanput...@gmail.commailto:kristy.vanput...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Jason, This is a great tool! The majority of government is trying to move to an open license, with GA leading in the geospatial front. What we need to get our heads around is the difference between CCBY 4.0 and ODBL. Community outreach programs would be great, or even potentially working with spatial institutes such as SSSI to encourage OSM in schools. I will take a look at the import list and see whats happening around the world - your right this might shed a light on potential assistance. As Andrew just pointed out access to imagery would also be very beneficial, I will look into this a bit further and see what can be done there (specially ACT to start with). I will start to contact the super users in ACT. Cheers On Tue, 5 May 2015 at 16:44 Jason Ward jasonjwa...@gmail.commailto:jasonjwa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Kristy, Not a large userbase in the ACT and not all of them may subscribe to this list. To help you in your search the following link may prove useful (Suggest unticking Black, Red and Orange users in the top left corner for a closer measure of 'active' contributors) http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/oooc?zoom=11lat=-35.29175lon=149.1788 5layers=B00FTT While I don't represent the contributors in ACT it would be great if (the whole of) government was able to provide or make accessible data with suitable licence clearances for use in OSM. Despite that and noting the small contributor count in the region maybe more 'useful' would be the application of resources to help with the contribution of
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Thanks for 25/4/2015
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Nicolas Pettiaux nico...@pettiaux.be wrote: We have been asked now to do another party, focusing on using josm to add (a lot) of data. First you need a lot of data to enter. I still prefer my own pictures/notes above any other source. When the Mapillary plugin is ready/usable (september 2015?) this might be a great source, but it will also contain a lot of pictures that are useless for mapping. It also takes way too long before they are available on the map (3 days or so at the moment). Preferred formula: people collect data before the mapping party, e.g. taking pictures in their own neighborhood. If you announce it before the holidays, they have 2 months to collect pictures. Not everybody will collect a few hundred pictures in 1 hour :-) During the party, we can teach them how to use JOSM to improve the map based on their pictures. Pictures can reside on their own disk or on Mapillary. But I prefer that they make their own notes/photos and that they do not have to start hunting for useful pictures from other people on Mapillary. The presentation that was distributed contained a section with ideas for photo's and things to map. I can give a few links to my photo website for additional ideas. regards m ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
