On 10/23/12 1:52 AM, Russ Nelson wrote:
William Morris writes:
Third local mapper chimes in: As weird as the cartography will look (and
I've seen it appear as such on OSM in other U.S. cities), Route 7 through
Burlington has no business being listed as primary. I can hit a maximum of
On 10/20/12 10:07 PM, Mike N wrote:
On 10/20/2012 5:55 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
i've just written this up in a blog posting. The lightning talk was
entitled
Maps for First Responders.
Great post! The politics are the hardest part of the process - the
Trimet-Portland program is a great way
we got some. Carl Frantzen of Talking Points Memo asked me about coming
to SOTM US and
i urged him to do so. he did and here we are:
http://idealab.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/10/openstreetmap-part-1-new-cartographers.php
___
Talk-us mailing list
the scrubbing looks mostly ok, BUT...
i am one of the folks who started out using US:state:CR for county
route networks, which i now believe was
a mistake. we really should be using county names, not CR in the network
tag, e.g.
network=US:NY:Rensselaer
otherwise we can't really tell which
this is the video that was shown during the welcome session at SOTM US
on Saturday morning.
pretty cool.
https://vimeo.com/51341994
richard
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
suggested that I
replace them with something like this so it's not necessary to know all the county names
in order to correctly interpret something as a county route:
network=US:NY:CR:Rensselaer
Kosher?
-mike.
On Oct 18, 2012, at 5:16 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
the scrubbing looks
excellent. these are back up to the expected size, and so presumably are
fairly complete.
richard
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
On 10/17/12 10:55 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Was hoping to see a 10/16 or 10/17 snapshot, since I just did a good size
edit for Tulsa highway construction and the brand new overpass now
permanently closed over Charles Page Boulevard that a garbage truck
totalled on Monday...
the updates get done
Monitoring was
not required.
Retiring Board Members (did not run):
Michal Migurski
Richard Welty
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
a reminder, nominations close at 5pm Pacific Time (8pm Eastern Time) today.
there are now 5 nominees, so i withdraw my threat to run again.
richard
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Nominations closed 1/2 hour ago, and the ballot links have just been sent.
while there are only 5 nominees, we would appreciate it if everyone took
the minute or two it takes to
vote anyway.
the first link in the mail is for the ballot, the second is for removal.
they aren't labeled, my
we're working out processes in light of the fact that we have installed
a new membership tracking
system, and are working through some modest bugs that need to be
addressed before we send
out links for voting this coming friday. so here are some key things...
1) verifiying that board
On 10/7/12 3:23 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
Lambertus's site is having some issues with the latest set. Probably
best to ignore these at the moment.
is the issue just missing sections? i noticed the file was much smaller
than normal, but my
garmin recognizes it and the map around Albany, NY seems
the nominations are still open, at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States/Elections/2012
hopefully folks are still thinking about this.
if at the close, there are not 5 nominees, even though i intended to
step down, i'll nominate
myself with an eye towards
On 10/1/12 1:40 AM, Alan Millar wrote:
On Sat, 2012-09-29 at 17:48 -0400, Richard Welty wrote:
my Nuvi is relatively new (about 2 years old). how old is the firmware
on your Nuvi?
Mine is rather old. Not sure about the date, but probably at least 5
years old. It just says Nuvi 200, software
On 10/1/12 2:21 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Does Lambertus follow the list?
i don't know, but he does read and respond to messages sent through the
openstreetmap.org
messaging system.
richard
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
i encourage everyone going to portland to take a look at the trimet trip
planner
at trimet.org
it's built on OSM, it's very well done, and it's convinced me that i
don't need to rent
a car in Portland.
richard
___
Talk-us mailing list
On 9/29/12 5:18 PM, Alan wrote:
Anyone else have problems with recent versions of these no longer working for them?
i generally take the 4G version, and the recent ones have worked fine on
my Nuvi 255W.
my Nuvi is relatively new (about 2 years old). how old is the firmware
on your Nuvi?
Nominations are now open. The election page is here; if you wish to
nominate someone (it's ok
to nominate yourself), add your name to the table under Candidates
Results. Nominations
will close on Friday, October 12th at 5pm Pacific Time.
there's a lonely table on the sotm us wiki page,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/State_Of_The_Map_U.S._2012#Lightning_Talks
for lightning talks. i have the only proposal there right now, it'd be
great to have some competition.
anyone attending who has a short subject is encouraged to make a
On 9/17/12 7:48 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
I've been doing some work in the North Cascades National Park. It
appears that the border between the US and Canada is wrong. Look at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.9841lon=-121.743zoom=13layers=M
It appears that the boarder sags to the south. I
we are currently reviewing voting procedures with an eye towards
finalizing the process and
timeline in the next day or two. we anticipate opening nominations as
soon as the procedures
are published, aiming to hold a vote in conjunction with SOTM US.
if you are interested in running and/or
On 9/12/12 11:05 PM, James Mast wrote:
Maybe we should allow NE2 back in here so he can also comment on this.
Also, as far as I know, he had nothing to do with any SR tags in
California, but I'm not 100% sure.
what i recall is that NE2 likes the appearance of bare route numbers and
most of
On 9/12/12 11:24 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Richard Welty
rwe...@averillpark.net mailto:rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
what i recall is that NE2 likes the appearance of bare route
numbers and most of his ref
tags have no prefix at all (see FL, PA
On 9/11/12 11:27 AM, Charlotte Wolter wrote:
Toby,
Yes, it looks really different. Thanks!
If you have time, a few blocks further north, around Mission
Boulevard, missing streets reappear.
Actually the 2012 stuff looks better than earlier unedited
TIGER. Maybe they are
On 9/7/12 10:20 PM, AJ Ashton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
You may remember my TIGER 2011 rendered tile layer that's based on TIGER
shapefiles from late 2011. TIGER recently updated to include data from 2012,
Very nice. The 2011 tiles have been an
On 9/4/12 7:10 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
Hi all,
You may remember my TIGER 2011 rendered tile layer that's based on TIGER
shapefiles from late 2011. TIGER recently updated to include data from
2012, so I imported that data and have a new tile layer here:
On 8/4/12 1:26 PM, Mike N wrote:
On 8/4/2012 2:27 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
I would like to know if this is useful to anybody, or what I can do to
make it more so.
Very nice - it makes it easy to find, check, and fix all the roads
that were touched.
yes, it helped find a number of
On 7/30/12 5:11 AM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
On 07/29/2012 11:56 PM, Skye Book wrote:
Do we have a source for NYC administrative boundaries?
http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/bytes/districtsmetadata.shtml
there also should be boundaries in TIGER. most of the problems i've seen
with nominatim and
On 7/8/12 10:03 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
O
I have another such thing local to me - Erie Canal National Heritage
Corridor. (Some roads and trails are signed or otherwise identified
as belonging to it.) It appears to be designated by National Park
Service, rather than DOT.
I just checked, though,
On 7/8/12 11:00 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
Along the same lines, there are various memorial highways all over the
place although I'm not sure they really need anything but a name tag
in the relation
i think you're exactly correct. a relation with the name in a tag is
probably sufficient and fits
On 5/10/12 12:39 PM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 12:33 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Is this a good idea? It looks really odd to me:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/9061339
I agree that it looks odd. Expand Drive perhaps, but expanding all of
it looks rather awkward.
On 4/30/12 10:35 PM, Mike N wrote:
On 4/30/2012 10:24 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
I believe It was stopped after some
complaints about it not handling some situations correctly. But I
would probably be in favor of trying to complete it.
I would agree - there's no point in asserting that we have
On 4/1/12 6:11 PM, David Litke wrote:
I am a newbie, wonder why the current license change downtime is
affecting data. Does the new license make some existing data illegel
and hence they are removing it? Or are they making use of the downtime
to do additional QC edits/deletions?
illegal is
On 3/15/12 7:10 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 3/15/2012 6:43 PM, Nathan Mills wrote:
On 3/15/2012 4:59 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
lots of driving and all you get is street names, since everything else
is single-family houses.
And address points
How does this work? Do you stop at every
On 3/11/12 11:16 AM, Phil! Gold wrote:
I'm partial to the idea of separating the banner from the reference
number, but I'm not sure how any of these ideas mesh with the
understandings of people with more experience with road networks than I
have.
i like the idea of separating banners out too,
On 1/31/12 4:41 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/31/2012 4:07 PM, Nick Hocking wrote:
Blimey - two streets up from Arvia, Asbury Street was incorrectly
named in OSM as Ashbury.
Just how many typos are there in L.A.
Hey - now there's a good idead for
On 1/13/12 10:49 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
If your own area is clean, please consider helping out in more heavily
affected areas.
The Capital District of NY is in pretty good shape and i cleaned up the
things that were going to be the worst problems already.
i know Martijn has a bunch of
On 1/14/12 1:20 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
i know Martijn has a bunch of issues out in the SLC area, so i'm
volunteering to take assignments from him to do cleanups out there.
Thanks. I'm asking for help on the main
On 1/9/12 1:11 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Metcalf, Calvin (DOT)
calvin.metc...@state.ma.us wrote:
as there is that brand tag,
There's an operator tag. I've not seen brand as a tag.
brand is getting used heavily for gas stations, where it makes all kinds of
On 1/3/12 7:00 AM, talk-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
From: Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk To: OSM Talk
talk@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Request for
Romano-British features Message-ID: 4f02da15.1030...@lsces.co.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
the draft criteria may be found here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/State_Of_The_Map_U.S._2012/BIDS/CRITERIA
this is only slightly changed from the 2010 criteria. we are not yet
soliciting
bids, but hope to publish a timeline for the bidding process in the near
future.
while this is
ITO World has added a new US-centric layer to their OSM suite, Tiger
Reviewed:
http://itoworld.blogspot.com/2011/12/new-tiger-reviewed-map-layer-for-ito.html
this differs from the MapQuest tiger edited layer in that it divides the
roads into
three groups:
never-edited routes that have
On 11/2/11 1:49 AM, Nathan Mills wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 00:02:13 -0400, Richard Welty wrote:
i don't know about that, but i certainly think that the current default
mapnik rendering for openstreetmap.org is showing us too much addressing
detail. i'm not sure what showing the address
On 11/2/11 6:52 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
It's hardly a quick fix and you know that's not what we are setting
out to achieve here. A quick fix would be for me to just take those
shapefiles and dump them right into OSM. What we're doing instead here
is considering if and how existing sources
On 10/23/11 2:07 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/17161384/history
Alte Eisenbahn is German for old railway, which is a correct
description of the way.
why do you think it's a screwup? do you have local knowledge of the
situation.
richard
On 10/23/11 2:45 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 10/23/2011 2:34 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 10/23/11 2:07 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/17161384/history
Alte Eisenbahn is German for old railway, which is a correct
description of the way.
why do you think
On 10/23/11 3:02 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 10/23/2011 2:59 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
from Mike's comment, the name appears to likely be correct local usage.
Mike's link is from Wisconsin; the way is in Connecticut.
ok, fine, but you're still making an assumption that may turn out
On 10/22/11 8:33 PM, Metcalf, Calvin (DOT) wrote:
This is something that I've been wondering in ma, would on road sign posted
routes (there is a sign on a post next to the road) be tagged differently the
on road shared use (there is a picture of bicycle in the lane but cars also
use it)
Sent
On 10/22/11 9:17 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
i think they should be tagged differently.
if there's just a black on yellow sign saying share the road then cyclists
should stay to the right.
Only if the outside lane is about
On 10/22/11 9:59 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
this text may be found in section 1234 on this page:
https://www.nysdot.gov/divisions/operating/opdm/local-programs-bureau/repository/bicycle/safety-and-laws/laws.html
Hmm, I just
On 10/18/11 5:43 AM, Alexander Roalter wrote:
I recently started converting the Iowa and Minnesota county borders
from simple ways to correct boundary relations, which means also
removing the doubled ways the adjacent areas share.
So far, so good, but I encountered some questions:
Shouldn't
to thank the outgoing members of the board for their
service to the community. I would also like to thank all of the
candidates for offering to serve for the next year.
Richard Welty, was re-elected. Martijn, Randy, Jim and Mike were each
elected.
You can find the detailed results on the wiki
the number works, i'm enjoying hold music. no need for an emergency
search for another free conference call service.
On 10/12/11 6:13 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
i'll be there, although i think i'll call the number at 6:30pm ET
tonight to
verify that it works. anyone should feel free to join me
On 10/12/11 8:26 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Steven Johnsonsejohns...@gmail.comwrote:
Would next Thu (20 Oct) work for an annual meeting/presentation from the
outgoing board? That would at least give us a chance to prepare (i.e. gather
our wits).
I think that'd work
On 10/7/11 6:34 AM, Peter Dobratz wrote:
I had been tagging them highway=service, but with access=private.
that works, although access=emergency is (i think) best.
richard
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
On 9/20/11 5:08 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
I don't think the OSMF manifesto was mandatory, but I agree: if you are a
nominated candidate (or are nominating a candidate) it would be very helpful
to see some description of why someone might vote for that person over other
candidates listed.
i'm
On 9/15/11 2:01 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
I can answer some (but not all) of your questions, Josh:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Josh Doej...@joshdoe.com wrote:
Has the Technical, Education Student Outreach or US Tagging working
groups ever met?
the US tagging group was my proposal. the
On 8/22/11 10:53 AM, Brad Neuhauser wrote:
I do my best to avoid anything to do with highway relations, but FWIW I
recently did just this in Potlatch 2--split a way that's part of relations
to add a bridge and totally ignored the relations--and it all worked out
fine as far as I can tell:
On 8/20/11 7:52 AM, Peter Dobratz wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Henk Hofftoffeh...@gmail.com wrote:
To my understanding our tagging-standard for State Highways is [STATE]
[NUMBER]
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging#State_Highways
I agree that we should
On 8/18/11 10:25 AM, Toby Murray wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
So just tag it as fuel:octane_87, fuel:octane_89, etc. Not Sure about
the kerosene. fuel:kerosene=yes would seem logical but I'm not sure
what the non-taxable use has to do with
On 6/26/11 12:40 AM, Dion Dock wrote:
Here's my opinion, and we all know what opinions are worth. :)
I can understand why highway=path makes sense from a routing perspective.
However, when I look at Mapnik, I want to see the way's intended use. I'm sure
there are plenty of counterexamples,
On 6/26/11 7:26 PM, Nick Hocking wrote:
Thanks Mike,
I've just had a bit of a play with this and have it pretty much under
control. I've added four or five new roads. The method works well.
I guess that I've now got about twenty hours of hard work to bring Grand
Junction up to TIGER 2010
On 6/20/11 8:29 PM, PJ Houser wrote:
I'm sure this was discussed ad nauseum at some point, so feel free to point
me to the correct thread.
i would say that consensus was not achieved.
i personally favor highway=path and then
setting bicycle, foot, etc., to indicate access permissions as
On 6/15/11 9:20 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 6/15/11 8:57 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
FYI the early bird sale ends in 5 hours :)
then i'll dig up the code and post it here.
warning: we will be checking to make sure it's used only by members,
so if you're not a member, please don't use it.
never
On 6/15/11 8:57 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
FYI the early bird sale ends in 5 hours :)
then i'll dig up the code and post it here.
warning: we will be checking to make sure it's used only by members, so
if you're not a member, please don't use it.
richard
On 6/14/11 10:25 PM, Kristian Zoerhoff wrote:
I would think Sears = department store; they called themselves that for many
years. I think something like Super Wal-Mart or (here in the Midwest) Meijer
is tougher; is it department store, clothing, grocery, or something else?
the variety of goods
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:53:59 -0400 Julio Costa Zambelli
julio.co...@openstreetmap.cl wrote:
We have made and given away mugs[1], pencils and t-Shirts[2], and the last
ones have proven to be the most effective way of advertising the project.
Even though t-shirts are relatively expensive compared
On 6/9/11 1:27 PM, Ben Supnik wrote:
Based on the threads about broken imports that took place over the
last few weeks, it looks like there is still an additional problem:
even given pre-converted data, users who want to do a import may get
killed when their import fails, leaving a
On 6/5/11 10:26 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 9:46 PM, James Mastrickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
I'm also leaning away from distinguishing unposted routes. I don't
think they should be in the database. If they are unposted, the could
be confusing to a user on the ground
On 6/5/11 12:15 AM, nat...@nwacg.net wrote:
In Arkansas, routes are not unsigned or (except in very rare cases) cosigned.
The route ends where it meets a route of higher priority and begins again as a
new segment elsewhere.
Most Arkansas state highways and some US highways fall victim to this
On 6/3/11 11:54 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
Will the organizers help out in processing the US visas? 2 months is
really, really short time to apply and be granted a US visa based on
stories I've heard.
as Hurricane said, preliminary stuff is done; SOTM is listed on the
US
On 6/3/11 6:27 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 06/02/2011 11:05 AM, Hillsman, Edward wrote:
If you set up a group on meetup.com you'd be surprised how many people
join and start to get interested once you have a group meeting monthly.
There is a fee to set up a group on Meetup.
Does
On 6/3/11 8:51 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Ian Deesian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone used OSM for emergency routing with squad cars or ambulances?
Sounds like a really terrible idea.
Are there any existing tags to specify emergency-only roads?
access=no
On 6/2/11 1:19 PM, Steve Coast wrote:
Well.. it's chicken and egg. There wasn't anyone interested in the UK
when I ran the first mapping parties there either.
If you set up a group on meetup.com you'd be surprised how many people
join and start to get interested once you have a group
On 6/2/11 10:17 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
Hi all,
Has anyone used OSM for emergency routing with squad cars or ambulances?
I've found someone on reddit who is interested in loading their Garmin with
routable data so they can more-quickly get to their destination. Apparently
their jurisdiction doesn't
i'm deliberately not quoting or responding here in order
to break out of the current, somewhat circular discussion.
the trunk classification does two things:
1) it influences rendering engines
2) it influences routing
we all are familiar with what impact 1 has, but i think a lot of folks are
On 5/29/11 11:37 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
in short: a routing engine will probably use classifications where maxspeed
data is missing, but probably only to derive guesstimates of maxspeed
values.
Now that I think about it,
On 5/29/11 11:59 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
On 5/29/11 11:37 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.net
wrote:
in short: a routing engine will probably use classifications
On 5/28/11 10:40 AM, Mike N wrote:
On 5/28/2011 9:12 AM, Anthony wrote:
Trunk has no meaning beyond color the road the same color as other
things that are tagged trunk.
Even color is not defined - some trunks can be toll / not toll.
However, trunk *could* serve as a router hint that the
On 5/27/11 12:00 PM, Alex Mauer wrote:
On 05/27/2011 09:06 AM, Richard Welty wrote:
if you peruse the wiki, and make a reasonably through search
for definitions of trunk in the US, you will find an extensive
complex of contradictions and inconsistencies.
Maybe someone should find all
I'm putting together a Mappy hour for Capital District mappers
on Tuesday June 11th, probably around 7pm, venue TBD (I'm
aiming for a place that's kind of central.) if you're in the area,
please mark your calendars and watch for further announcements.
there's a capital district meetup group
On 5/16/11 11:10 AM, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
On 16 May 2011 06:09, Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
i recently spent some quality time doing tiger review in a community
that has a rather straightforward naming system for its avenues.
it starts with A Avenue to the south and steps
On 5/16/11 1:16 PM, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
On 16 May 2011 17:56, Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
On 5/16/11 11:10 AM, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
On 16 May 2011 06:09, Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.netwrote:
i recently spent some quality time doing tiger review in a
i recently spent some quality time doing tiger review in a community
that has a rather straightforward naming system for its avenues.
it starts with A Avenue to the south and steps through the alphabet
as the avenues appear to the north.
a de-abbreviation bot had been run on the area.
it should
On 5/3/11 7:00 AM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Jaak Laineste jaak.laineste at gmail.com writes:
Is there good reason to add addr:country, addr:county, addr:city and
other regional tags to all the address tags, if OSM database already
has administrative regions for given area?
I don't
On 3 May 2011 15:03:07 +0200, M?rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I know. In your case (just one house) the relation indeed seems
to be far less adequate in respect to simple tags. Relations add a
complexity that is mostly not desirable IMHO for cases like
housenumbers. The
On 5/1/11 2:35 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Richard Weaitrich...@weait.com wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Alan Millargrunthos...@yahoo.com wrote:
Yeah... Every time I go editing in some new place, I always find another
reason to hate newbies, too.
I think
given that we have a new logo, is it possible to get more size options
uploaded to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Logo
i'm working on a presentation, and it'd be nice to put the new logo
on the title page, but 120x120 is a bit small.
thanks,
richard
On 4/25/11 7:03 PM, Mike N wrote:
On 4/25/2011 6:45 PM, Alan Mintz wrote:
Please don't import these without verifying against your own local
knowledge or other sources. Experience is that they are poorly
geo-referenced and/or have other problems
In fact I treat them as individual bug
this occurred to me while surveying speed limits in a somewhat rural
part of the US.
are any of the routing engines looking at the surface tag as part of
their decision making?
i ask this because in NY, the default speed limit in rural areas is 55
on all roads. there are numerous unpaved roads
On 4/15/11 10:53 AM, Nic Roets wrote:
Hello Richard,
Gosmore looks at maxspeed and tracktype.
I did not use surface, because I am under the impression that it is
possible to drive fast on properly maintained dirt roads in dryer
regions.
interesting. i haven't been setting tracktype because
On 4/15/11 11:30 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/4/15 Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.net:
i ask this because in NY, the default speed limit in rural areas is 55
on all roads.
highway=unclassified
name=Mead Road
maxspeed=55 mph
surface=dirt
I suggest you also add
On 4/15/11 11:16 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 16 April 2011 00:36, Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
i ask this because in NY, the default speed limit in rural areas is 55
on all roads. there are numerous unpaved roads (dirt, gravel) which
do not have posted speed limits, but where
On 4/13/11 10:44 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 04/10/2011 06:25 PM, Alan Mintz wrote:
At 2011-04-10 14:00, Kristian M Zoerhoff wrote:
What's the consensus for county roads in the US?
I don't know what the consensus is.
County roads in California are of the form [A-Z][0-9][0-9]. I tag Orange
On 4/13/11 4:18 PM, Kristian M Zoerhoff wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:56:51AM -0400, Richard Welty wrote:
ways vs. relations. we need the identifier on ways because of the
data consumers
that expect to render directly. for relations, we should in theory
be only including
the actual
one of the tags would need to be the dates for which the routes are known
to be good. for many districts, this would be a single year.
On 4/12/11 6:04 PM, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
Well, it would be useful to have this information available in the database, as
long as it is kept up-to-date.
On 4/11/11 1:47 PM, Phil! Gold wrote:
* Nathan Millsnat...@nwacg.net [2011-04-10 19:22 -0500]:
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 20:14:18 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
How about simply network=US:CA:CR?
That's all well and good for California, but what about states like
Arkansas (and Florida, IIRC) where
On 4/10/11 5:00 PM, Kristian M Zoerhoff wrote:
Would it be:
Big Timber Road. network=us_il_kane
this is a reasonable network tag for the ways.
I don't want ref tags on these, as the shields will quickly get too
cluttered in Mapnik.
that must be a lot of county roads, i haven't perceived a
On 4/10/11 7:10 PM, Alan Mintz wrote:
At 2011-04-10 15:39, Richard Welty wrote:
i have comment tags on the relevant ways now, but i'm going to change
comment to README to make it more obvious.
Hmmm. I've been using http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:note for
such comments. Any idea
401 - 500 di 698 matches
Mail list logo
