I don't know how iD does it, but Vespucci includes the imagery used when
you actually made an edit, potentially multiple different sources. You
should still enter a source comment, imagery_used is simply for
additional documentation purposes.
Am 07.09.2019 um 18:54 schrieb Edward Bainton:
> I've
Thanks for the responses. Some comments below.
On Sun, 1 Sep 2019 at 23:15, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Sep 2019 at 10:02, Simon Jackson
> wrote:
>
>> *Short Version:*
>> https://arcg.is/0Tu8Tb
>> Start a discussion on incorporating the VicMap Property datas
None of that data is actually open, it is just somebody trying to
leverage implied association with OpenStreetMap and what people
associate with that, to further their own project.
Simon
Am 31.08.2019 um 23:33 schrieb BD:
> For some time I did wonder why this information is not availa
Got to the 1st line of 2nd page and found the 1st error (as papers on OSM go
that is not bad).
Am 28. August 2019 15:05:09 MESZ schrieb "François Lacombe"
:
>Hi all,
>
>Noticed this content today, I don't think this has already been posted
>here. If not, sorry for noise.
>
>People of JRC (Joint
mundraub.org sichtbar zu
machen müsste man also dort einen Account machen und die Sachen dort
eintragen. Oder sehe ich das falsch?
Simon
Am 24/08/2019 um 23:19 schrieb schimmer:
> On 2019-08-24 16:21, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> sent from a phone
>>
>>> On 24. Aug 2019,
the issue would require the original
maintainer taking the app down.
Outside of that I'm not quite sure what the issue is supposed to be. If
you get that upset about a random bit of unmaintained software, you are
going to be spending an awful lot of time being unhappy.
Simon
Am 17.08.2019 um 13
qui utilise
ce compte.
Simon
Simon REAU
GEOVELO
www.geovelo.fr
MAME, 49 Boulevard de Preuilly, 37000 Tours
<https://osm.org/go/0AU_l4zJI?m=>
ᐧ
Le ven. 16 août 2019 à 13:38, rainerU a écrit :
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72339552
>
> Je doute que "rappele
Bonjour,
Je me présente, Simon de Geovelo. C'est moi qui est principalement en
charge des données OpenStreetMap chez Geovelo.
Désolé pour les délais de réponse. Pour cause de vacance le suivi de la
liste de diffusion et des contributions a pris un peux de retard chez nous.
Voici comment
with the overview map so that they always share the same
geographic direction).
Cheers
Simon
Am 06/08/2019 um 16:58 schrieb Nick Whitelegg:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> To follow up my post of a couple of months ago, I have made a few updates to
> OpenTrailView, a StreetView-like application
Thanks to Christine and the SotM-WG we've been allocated a slot and a
room in Heidelberg see https://2019.stateofthemap.org/sessions/AV9NWC/
Simon
Am 09.08.2019 um 09:41 schrieb Simon Poole:
> As we've mentioned multiple times over the last months, the LWG decided
> last year to consolida
time (you
should ask).
The related problem is that you will need to obtain a waiver for CC BY
material as CC BY is in many ways more restrictive than the ODbL (see
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/).
Simon
Am 13.08.2019 um 08:24 schrieb JS:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
a glimpse at the text here
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1e_IQYHtqVivGRw4O4EOn6__-LGMuzPlWz6XKEdAkwW0/edit?usp=sharing
the few things that are not nailed down belong to those that we would
appreciate feedback on.
Simon
PS: the number of coffee breaks permitting we might want to appropriate
another
ld require a yes, because now and then I'll map remote and
if it is simply reverting a changeset on request of a remote mapper, but
that doesn't mean that a) I in general think it is a good idea, b) it is
any significant part of my contributions.
Simon
Am 07.08.2019 um 12:59 schrieb Dorothea Kazaz
I believe the last errant changeset was just reverted.
Am 04.08.2019 um 11:37 schrieb Simon Poole:
> Seems as if the culprit is reverting the changesets themselves (not
> quite done as I write this). I do think a mandatory debrief on how they
> managed to do this without noticing i
ing is wrong.
Simon
Am 04.08.2019 um 08:32 schrieb Roland Olbricht:
> Dear all,
>
> there has been a couple of probably accidential movements of thousands
> of nodes off central London.
>
> The changesets in question are most likely
>
> 72980739
> 72980741
> 72980743
de: outside of raw total road length, a much more
sensible comparison would be completeness measures per road categories
(which I suspect is likely to look far less dramatic) and which might
give more realistic goals for the community.
Simon
>
> thanks,
> naveenpf
>
>
> On Fri, J
providers in OSMspace.
As a consequence I would try -not- to argue with costs when promoting OSM.
Simon
Am 25.07.2019 um 00:30 schrieb Graeme Fitzpatrick:
> OT to this particular problem, but still sort of on this subject ...
>
> One of the aircraft tracking sites I use
> http://au
There is no conflict.
The specific OS version of the OGL was/is incompatible, data released on
generic OGL terms including such by OS is (compatible).
Am 23.07.2019 um 16:37 schrieb Colin Smale:
>
>
> On 2019-07-23 16:05, Alessandro Sarretta wrote:
>
>> Just be careful that it seems that the OS
for sourcing information for OSM.
Simon
Am 22.07.2019 um 05:04 schrieb Kim Oldfield:
> Is it acceptable to copy a street address (and other contact details)
> from a business's webpage?
>
> For example in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72452124 (what
> changed is easier to
> I've noticed that some trigpoints are tagged with a reference prefixed
TPUK
I should also have said in my first reply that the page for each trig on
the trigpointing.uk website gives the source of the OS data that it uses
and shows the OS names. For example http://trigpointing.uk/trig/4791
> You may also be interested in this page on my user area of the OSM wiki:
I certainly am. Thank you kindly.
Regards
Simon
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
The answer the OP was looking for is likely https://www.gnssplanning.com/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
o ignoring the individuals posts. Calling people names is off
limits and doesn't need any additional confirmation in a CoC or whatever.
Simon
Am 25.06.2019 um 10:45 schrieb Harry Wood:
> I definitely support moderation actions on the diaries (or indeed any
> channel) when somebody steps
Am 24. Juni 2019 19:18:26 MESZ schrieb Greg Troxel :
>One wonders how RTC squares this decision with their legal obligation
>to
>act in the public interest. Not sharing data at all to get "related
>income" to fund their operation is one thing, but sharing with Google
>while not with OSM
Bonjour,
Je serais présent pour Geovelo et donc pour avoir du OSM par défaut.
On se refait un mini SOTM Vélo ?
Simon
Simon REAU
GEOVELO
www.geovelo.fr
simon.r...@geovelo.fr
Tél : 06 77 15 59 86
MAME, 49 Boulevard de Preuilly, 37000 Tours
<https://osm.org/go/0AU_l4zJI?m=>
ᐧ
Le jeu. 2
Should be fixed now thanks to Tom Hughes, seems as if the unpacking of
the coastline files ran out of space.
Note: neither a private slack channel nor a "relatively" obscure mailing
list are suitable channels for reporting operational problems. The
general OSM IRC channel or the operations
What GPS devices are people out there using, and how accurate are they?
I'm currently evaluating the Emlid Reach M+ device. It's a lovely little
thing, powered through the USB so can be run using a mobile phone power
bank. It has Bluetooth and uses your laptop or smartphone as a display and
Please no.
Essentially you are saying that all attribute tags that indicate that a
specific facility is present should be duplicated on the standalone
objects of the same type.
bin=yes on amenity=waste_basket, bench=yes on amenity=bench and so on.
Am 14.06.2019 um 09:27 schrieb Johnparis:
> For
The ODbL (like for example the CC licences too) does not allow
sub-licencing and stipulates that every licensee is licensed directly by
the OSMF.
Am 13.06.2019 um 19:10 schrieb Eugene Alvin Villar:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 6:17 PM Nuno Caldeira
> mailto:nunocapelocalde...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
_Mark>
> I have always wondered why it did not get more attention...
Because of legal issues with both the proposed logo and using it as a
replacement for "OpenStreetMap" for attribution purposes that have been
mentioned more than once (it should be noted by the way that neither
der verwendet
wird. Nicht jedoch JOSM, dort ist sind ein paar manuelle Schritte
notwendig: https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index/#using-this-index
Grüße!
Simon
___
Talk-at mailing list
Talk-at@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listi
e and move the
current named to name:en or perhaps int_name?
Simon
Am 31.05.2019 um 12:56 schrieb Shrinivasan T:
> Hello all,
>
> I am Shrini from Chennai, India.
>
> My language is Tamil.
> I want to get the tamilnadu state map in OSM in Tamil.
>
> For this, few profe
and community input we have now.
Simon
Am 29.05.2019 um 02:10 schrieb Clifford Snow:
> Why should one editor be held to higher standards than others?
> Shouldn't they all be held to the same standard?
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 4:53 PM john whelan <mailto:jwhelan0...@gm
The times in the changeset do not reflect the length of the associated editing
session except if the changeset was opened on purpose at the beginning which
IMHO no editor does.
Am 28. Mai 2019 19:53:22 MESZ schrieb Dave F via talk :
>I notice these changesets were completed in 30/60 seconds
Am 28. Mai 2019 17:44:25 MESZ schrieb Simon Poole :
>1st thing to do is to ask the napper to slow
... mapper :-)
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit Kaiten Mail gesendet.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
ht
1st thing to do is to ask the napper to slow down in a change set comment.
Am 28. Mai 2019 17:13:49 MESZ schrieb Jmapb :
>See yesterday's changesets:
>
>https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70676813 (
>https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=70676813 )
t is just as with kids you let it slip through and the
next time they try a bit more, till you have a completely untenable
situation. Rolling back a couple of months of work implies that those
holding the purse strings (whoever they may be) didn't get what they
were paying for and that, perhaps, mi
with respect to which
commits are integrated (IMHO too much work)
- engaging with the respective employers and ask them to rectify the
situation (obviously there's a big hole in this one)
That's probably about it.
Simon
Am 23.05.2019 um 18:11 schrieb Markus:
> Hello Bryan, hello everyone,
>
had stands and I had some very interesting chats.
It's a pity that nobody at the budget end of the market had stands. Maybe
it's too expensive for them to exhibit there. Anyhow, an interesting day
out.
Regards
Simon
On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 1:00 PM wrote:
> Send Talk-GB mailing l
are awarded exclusive rights for the territories in question
and I'm fairly sure the application will blow up in a big way if this is
not considered.
Simon
Am 18.05.2019 um 07:48 schrieb Andrew Harvey:
> Hi All,
>
> As my role on the OSGeo Oceania board I've been drafting up OSGeo
> Oceania's
m the outline and so on, any of these could be
very small even without squaring. Actually, squaring might impact them
negatively, particularly when the outline is rough, but as said: square
buildings are just so much easier on the eyes :-).
Simon
Am 10.05.2019 um 21:05 schrieb Pierre Béland via talk:
&
xistent community control or even just
control by the OSMF.
Simon
>
> -Mikel
>
> * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
>
>
> On Thursday, May 9, 2019, 4:18:20 PM EDT, Michael Reichert
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> this could be seen as a tagging discussion
Am 07.05.2019 um 10:51 schrieb Sebastian S.:
> Simon,
> I know about the reporting option, have reported some myself.
> However as outlined on this diary entry
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/alexkemp/diary/172800
> there have been thousands in the last couple of days.
> M
See https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/disingenuous
Am 22.04.2019 um 20:40 schrieb mmd:
> Am 22.04.19 um 12:37 schrieb Simon Poole:
>> The last functional addition to the editing API was just over a year
>> ago, in March 2018.
>>
>> Implying for rhetorical
Am 22.04.2019 um 18:46 schrieb Dave F via talk:
> Was this new/improvement additions or bug/maintenance fix?
As said, it was an addition.
Simon
>
> DaveF
>
> On 22/04/2019 11:37, Simon Poole wrote:
>> The last functional addition to the editing API was just over a year
The last functional addition to the editing API was just over a year
ago, in March 2018.
Implying for rhetorical purposes that "nothing has changed" is rather
disingenuous.
Simon
Am 22.04.2019 um 11:59 schrieb Ilya Zverev:
> This attitude: “to do well we would need peopl
the patch applied so the fix is simply to remove the
explicit dependency which wasn't needed with modern JDKs in any case.
Simon
Am 12.04.2019 um 11:03 schrieb Simon Poole:
> https://github.com/openstreetmap/osmosis/pull/50
>
> Am 12.04.2019 um 10:16 schrieb Maarten Deen:
>> On 2
https://github.com/openstreetmap/osmosis/pull/50
Am 12.04.2019 um 10:16 schrieb Maarten Deen:
> On 2019-04-12 09:52, Simon Poole wrote:
>> Am 12.04.2019 um 08:26 schrieb Maarten Deen:
>>>
>>> Does the determination in java follow the same rules (or even the same
>
Am 12.04.2019 um 08:26 schrieb Maarten Deen:
>
> Does the determination in java follow the same rules (or even the same
> library) as file(1)? In its manpage it says
>> file tests each argument in an attempt to classify it. There are
>> three sets of tests, performed in this order: filesystem
Am 11.04.2019 um 21:26 schrieb Roland Olbricht:
>
> Could it have been that the file triggered an arcane bug in a gz library
> from the Java universe?
>
> ...
I decompressed the failing file using the same method as osmosis without
issue, so it must be fairly subtle whatever the issue is.
Am 11.04.2019 um 22:40 schrieb mmd:
>
> Too bad osmosis is still unmaintained...
"still"? afaik nobody has even lifted a finger to find a new maintainer,
so somehow I wouldn't expect a solution to the issue barring magic,
unicorns and so on.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Should be fixed now, thanks to Grant.
Am 11.04.2019 um 16:30 schrieb Simon Poole:
> Unzipping and re-zipping helps so it is not actually an error in the OSM
> data. AFAIK both sys admins are currently unavailable so it will take a
> while to fix.
>
> Simon
>
> Am 11.04.2019 u
Unzipping and re-zipping helps so it is not actually an error in the OSM
data. AFAIK both sys admins are currently unavailable so it will take a
while to fix.
Simon
Am 11.04.2019 um 16:17 schrieb Simon Poole:
> Sorry 643
>
> Am 11.04.2019 um 16:15 schrieb Simon Poole:
>>
It's diff 634 but the line number seems to be off, investigating.
Am 11.04.2019 um 11:31 schrieb Hartmut Holzgraefe:
> On 11.04.19 10:35, wambac...@posteo.de wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the differential update from planet.osm.org is making problems.
>>
> [...]
>>
udience before the first line of code
was written.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
uvollziehen, siehe
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/compare/v2.14.3...master (348
commits seit dem letzten Release im Februar).
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists
cket/17512 (if it will pass I
> will open equivalents
> for iD and Vespucci).
>
>
You don't need to do anything separate for Vespucci, simply make a PR
against https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/blob/master/data/discarded.json
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Am 17.03.2019 um 22:09 schrieb Dave F:
> Mateusz
> There's also a few osmarender:renderName in the UK. Maybe check
> osmarender:* to collate all?
>
> Simon
> Never comprehended the reluctance to remove dead items. Does stepping
> the version /really/ cause any harm?
>
Am 19.03.2019 um 18:44 schrieb Max:
> Finger weg von Smartphone im PKW.
Kann man nur unterstreichen.
Des weiteren ist es so, dass beim händischem Auslösen einer Markierung
(wie auch immer) in der Praxis die Lokalisierung viel zu ungenau ist um
wirklich von nutzen zu sein.
> Mache automatische
and if the objects are ever edited
the tags will then be removed.
Simon
Am 15.03.2019 um 20:16 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny:
> osmarender:nameDirection=* is an old tag that is case of tagging for
> the renderer.
> Additionally, Osmarender is defunct anyway.
>
> I propose to purge this ta
the previous incarnations
without first answering:
what is the purpose of the website that you can reach on openstreetmap.org?
Not that I expect agreement even on that.
Simon
>
> Imagine the openstreetmap.org home page, but without the map.
> What would the home page be abou
with the integration in OSM (which from a visibility POV is
very different from being registered in an obscure government database)?
Simon
Am 09.03.2019 um 19:21 schrieb Rory McCann:
> Might be interesting to some here
>
> On 07.03.19 21:32, Lanxana . wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>&g
er unclear what the terms are
supposed to apply to.
Simon
Am 09.03.2019 um 15:13 schrieb Bernhard Schmitz:
> Hello,
>
> is it legal to use the geoinformationdata from the
> geoinformationistitute Rheinland-Pfalz Germany for house numbering and
> buildings in OSM?
>
on-panable and zoomable) small map
snippets where on the one hand there are limitations to copyright and
other rights that might apply and on the other hand some practical
considerations.
Simon
Am 05.03.2019 um 09:37 schrieb althio:
> Richard, Simon, all,
> I am very happy with the current requirem
Am 03.03.2019 um 12:54 schrieb Ineiev:
> ...
> So, when someone violates that license when using the work of
> those contributors, any of them may sue the violator, mayn't they?
As the user is operating on a licence from the OSMF, the foundation
would have to make the determination that the
s you may see for numerous open
source projects). Consumers of OSM data are doing so on a licence
offered by the OSMF which has received the necessary rights for that
from you via the Contributor Terms.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
e balance it would seem the right thing to do
(we've had to take action with quite a few apps wrt trademarks over the
years so I don't think anybody should doubt our resolve if we really
think it is necessary).
Simon
>
>
> ___
> talk
orward about
attribution, not about your old grievances.
Simon
>
> So when relicensing the ultimate consequence is that you need to defend
> your license - and thats was my first question. Is the OSMF willing
> to enforce the license?
>
> I had my doubts that the ODbL will be
from providing
better attribution (again old example: on map attribution vs. a
paragraph underneath). Any guidance should, IMHO, just lay down the
rules for the minimal acceptable attribution but not limit how that can
be improved on.
Simon
>
> :Stefan
>
> P.S. I really would like to collect
Am 01.03.2019 um 20:20 schrieb Andy Mabbett:
> ...
> The words you quote don't mean what you seem to think they do; they
> certainly do not authorise the OSMF to act as my agent in pursuing
> claims with regard to /my/ rights.
> ...
This is were you are confusing things: while it is true that
Am 01.03.2019 um 14:57 schrieb Florian Lohoff:
> ...
> So please either enforce the ODbL or relicense to CC0.
>
> ...
It is not a surprise that you are asking that, but just consider what
the world would be like if we only had laws that could guaranteed to be
100% enforced.
The good news is
party data (limitations of share alike on
third party data).
There are no guidelines that impact or weaken the application of the
ODbL wrt attribution of OSM, nor are is there any weakening of how the
ODbL applies to actual OSM data or derivatives.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: O
Am 01.03.2019 um 12:49 schrieb Andy Mabbett:
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 at 11:05, Mateusz Konieczny
> wrote:
>
>> Additional question - who can file DMCA. AFAIK only OSMF can do that and
>> individual
>> mappers are unable to do it, right?
> I am the copyright owner of my edits. You are the owner of
Am 01.03.2019 um 12:01 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny:
>
>
>
> Mar 1, 2019, 11:25 AM by si...@poole.ch:
>
> And specifically on the issue with Mapbox customers, one of the
> results of the 2014 discussions was this statement by Mapbox
>
Am 01.03.2019 um 10:48 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny:
.
> c) I recommend doing this, I tried mailing Mapbox about their
> license-breaking
> hiding attribution but at first their responded claiming that OSBL
> allows that,
> after quoting that part of them they went back to not responding
>
> d)
that it would still be considered a reasonable guideline./
/
Simon
//
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Am 01.03.2019 um 01:12 schrieb Andy Mabbett:
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 22:35, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>
>> "We require that you use the credit “© OpenStreetMap contributors”...
>> For a browsable electronic map, the credit should appear in the corner
>> of the map."
> 28 characters. There are
y .
Thanks to Kathleen Lu for authoring the review.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
The OGl doesn't make any statements on the status of third party (in
this case OSMs) content included in the published dataset.
On 13.01.2019 11:31, Brian Prangle wrote:
> Does anyone have any contacts in GLA? Came across this entry at
> dat.gov.uk
>
Please see https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/
And really, besides all the other problems with the wiki, deducing
anything from the membership of an article in one of the multiple 10'000
essentially random categories is not a good idea.
Simon
Am 11.01.2019 um 12:01
Am 10.01.2019 um 12:11 schrieb Sérgio V.:
> Ah ok, thank you for both tips. Fortunately I was not phished to
> install anything from that site.
> Anyway, even if it could be an aleatory coincidence, it seems there's
> actually some decrease in editons in recent months,
> according to
Am 09.01.2019 um 21:47 schrieb Sérgio V.:
> According to "Alexa Traffic Rank":
> "The rank [of openstreetmap.org] declined 517 positions versus the
> previous 3 months".
> Global Rank: 7,069
> https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/openstreetmap.org
> ("The rank is calculated using a combination of
: "because people can find stuff then".
The slightly longer version is that there are likely economic benefits
of many different kinds (traffic control, real estate, marketing and so
on) that are difficult to quantify but are likely there.
Simon
Am 03.01.2019 um 22:33 schrieb Mart
Am 26.12.2018 um 11:46 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> It seems more straightforward to fix this upstream rather than asking a
> myriad of downstream users to patch it. As it is with one of our most
> prominent users, maybe this specific issue should be discussed on the board?
>
This is not the
not scale). Please feel
free to engage Die Zeit and if you do not get a satisfactory response
you can submit a properly documented case to the LWG and we will, time
permitting, take action.
Simon
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://list
material it needs to be clear that the purpose of the
guidelines is to outline "safe" ways to provide appropriate attribution
and not to be an exhaustive list of all ways to so so.
Simon
On 19.12.2018 12:08, Christoph Hormann wrote:
> ...
> Glad to hear the LWG is working on cle
von gemeinfreien Werken erlauben.
Genau gleich bez. Lichtbildschutz anstatt einen, IMHO, hoffnungslosen
Fall durch die Instanzen zu treiben, lieber auf den Gesetzgeber
einwirken das der Schutz eingeschränkt oder ganz abgeschafft wird.
Simon
Am 20.12.2018 um 23:49 schrieb Stefan Kaufmann:
>
ent from a phone
>
>> On 19. Dec 2018, at 10:42, Simon Poole wrote:
>>
>> A seat on the advisory board requires at least a "gold" level membership
>> which costs EUR 1 per year.
> ___
> talk mailing list
&g
part of a Collective Database,
and that it is available under this License.
Simon
On 19.12.2018 09:42, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 19.12.2018 09:33, Ervin Malicdem wrote:
>> I just hoped before they were given a seat as part of OSMF's ADVISORY
>> board, these issues h
not being airports because they hadn't
designated them as such.
Am 11.12.2018 um 14:11 schrieb Colin Smale:
>
> On 2018-12-11 13:53, Simon Poole wrote:
>
>> As Frederik pointed out a bit back, this is just kicking the can down
>> the road.
>>
>> We will stil
that were being paid for what they
were doing), and it will not go away by adding more tags.
Simon
Am 11.12.2018 um 10:03 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 11. Dec 2018, at 02:18, Andy Townsend wrote:
>>
>> Watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4AivEQm
On Thursday, 29 November 2018 3:07:19 PM AEDT Michael Collinson wrote:
> The nodes on each side are not actually joined to the highway, just
> overlapping.
All good. Routing goes via the punt now.
--
Regards
Simon Slater
Registered Linux User #463789 @ http://linuxcount
a simple way, or a route
> > relation[2]
I made changes to this ferry route https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/627090817
a while ago, but OSRM is still not routing traffic across the punt. Can
anyone see what I missed?
--
Regards
Simon Slater
R
none of this stops you
from producing maps with other borders, however imaginary they might be.
Simon
Am 20.11.2018 um 07:15 schrieb Tomas Straupis:
> Hello
>
> I think this needs more attention and should not be silently buried
> in archives.
>
> OSMF/DWG has sided with M
would want to do something on a smaller
scale, would that clearly be at a county level. Frederik is likely to
groan at that idea, but some how I suspect that CA county level extracts
would be comparable with states in other countries.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Geschäften die eine nicht eingetragene,
Fantasie Firma verwenden, ein Interesse am Inhaber durchaus begründbar ist.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org
The point mentioning my pull request
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/2028 is a
bit misleading: the PR doesn't just add links, it integrates accepting
the ToU in to the signup process.
That said, feedback is welcome, best on the PR.
Simon
Am 27.10.2018 um 16:19
nsing / terms
of use.
If the LWG can be of any help, please feel free to contact us at:
le...@osmfoundation.org
Simon
Am 24.10.2018 um 10:45 schrieb Deborah Yates:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> I am writing to let you know about a project we are working on at the
> Open Data Institute that
Am 09.10.2018 um 16:48 schrieb Frederik Ramm:
> ..
> Is this a new phenomenon?
Nope, variants of these scams have been around for ages on amazon (for
ages==since you can self publish via amazon).
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital sig
t; get results, but who would fund it? Perhaps a petition to get
> visibility for the issue?
>
>
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2018, 01:55 Simon Poole, <mailto:si...@poole.ch>> wrote:
>
> The question is what not "ignoring this" entails.
>
> Essentially
201 - 300 di 3568 matches
Mail list logo
