On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Alan Millar amillar...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't seen a conclusion on what people want to see in the naming
convention (see for example the thread at
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2010-April/003138.html).
Just because the conversation is
At 2010-07-30 07:28, Anthony wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Alan Millar amillar...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't seen a conclusion on what people want to see in the naming
convention (see for example the thread at
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
There's another, very important use for the tiger:reviewed tag.
As I've said above, that's the one tiger tag I don't remove (until
I've reviewed the way, of course).
You don't seem to have read that message. In it
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
So, the guys that actually went out and were nice enough to collect this
TIGER data and share it with us have names for all these things: TLIDs.
That's a pretty concrete, real-world meaning to some people.
Not in osm context.
Just for that short little bridge? This info should be right (which
means *one* tlid) or it shouldn't be there at all. We shouldn't keep
this crap around just for the hell of it.
By deleting it you're not making it more correct.
Never said I was. But deleting incorrect
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.netalan_mintz%2b...@earthlink.net
wrote:
I really don't understand your argument. It's the nature of OSM that many
people will contribute many types of data, much of which will not be cared
about or understood by the
At 2010-07-30 12:56, Apollinaris Schoell
wrote:
How would I even go about checking? Is this really something
we
should be doing every time we make a bridge?
what a waste of time, let's go mapping instead. this is a wast of
time
I think we should enhance Josm/Potlatch to remove these tags in
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.netalan_mintz%2b...@earthlink.net
wrote:
At 2010-07-30 12:56, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
How would I even go about checking? Is this really something we should
be doing every time we make a bridge?
what a waste of
On 30 July 2010 21:00, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
There's another, very important use for the tiger:reviewed tag.
As I've said above, that's the one tiger tag I don't remove (until
I've reviewed the way, of
On 30 July 2010 22:12, Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
Do we really need
the database space that badly?
I've heard arguments on the talk list that this clutters the database
and similarly wikipedia= tags should be massively removed and if at
all, links should be maintained then
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 6:36 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
Also note that once there's a photo on flickr that is tagged with an
osm object id and a foursquare.com venue id at the same time, you have
a link between OSM and foursquare.com, no need to duplicate this
information
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
The way I see it is that if I were mapping an area from scratch, nobody
would go adding the TIGER tags. So if I completely redo an area, whether I
use existing ways or draw new ways, there's no reason to keep the TIGER
On 31 July 2010 00:50, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 6:36 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
Also note that once there's a photo on flickr that is tagged with an
osm object id and a foursquare.com venue id at the same time, you have
a link
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:11 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 July 2010 00:50, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 6:36 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Also note that once there's a photo on flickr that is tagged with an
osm
On 31 July 2010 02:24, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:11 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 July 2010 00:50, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 6:36 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Also
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:28 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 July 2010 02:24, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:11 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 31 July 2010 00:50, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On 31 July 2010 02:33, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:28 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see how it changes anything. If a piece of interstate I-405
is described by one relation or two ways one for each carriage in osm,
and 10
On 31 July 2010 03:02, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:44 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 July 2010 02:33, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:28 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com
wrote:
I
So are you saying you or someone else will be checking all TLIDs
against the TIGER data and correcting errors and adding missing ones?
I can imagine someone making some clever scripts and then manually
verifying it where there are doubts as a kind of personal project of
the week or something.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:40 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
So are you saying you or someone else will be checking all TLIDs
against the TIGER data and correcting errors and adding missing ones?
I can imagine someone making some clever scripts and then manually
verifying it
On 31 July 2010 04:06, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:40 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
So are you saying you or someone else will be checking all TLIDs
against the TIGER data and correcting errors and adding missing ones?
I can imagine
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:15 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 July 2010 04:06, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:40 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com
wrote:
I can imagine someone making some clever scripts and then manually
22 matches
Mail list logo
