Here's another really bogus way that he's added:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/106213109
This user IMO is screaming Block Me.
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 07:37:43 -0400
From: nice...@att.net
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-us] FYI - Georgia questionable edits
I noticed
I just thought I would throw this out there so this can be settled once and for
all. Which ref tag setup do you think should be used for State Highways on
ways (not relations)? PA-44 or 44. The reason I'm asking is because I've
seen several people put the state abbreviation in the ref field
I just happened to notice this guy tonight was going around and editing the
ref tags on highways in the US just to replace the space and put in the
hyphen. (I noticed this when going to load the I-77 NC relation to add in speed
limits I saw and wrote down on a recent trip to Charlotte because
Here's some examples you could test:
2 Interstates - I-77 I-74:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/16776408 (Note: IMO, I think the refs
should be I 77;I 74 instead since the mileage on this section is I-77's.)
2 Interstates + US Highway - I-73, I-74, US-220:
with also bannered US/State highways.
-- James
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 22:21:41 -0400
From: nerou...@gmail.com
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] shields and overlaps
On 6/4/2011 9:46 PM, James Mast wrote:
Also, are you going to try to add proper Future Interstate
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 10:26:25 -0400
From: rich...@weait.com
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] shields and overlaps
I'm leaning away from distinguishing Future shields; I've already
stripped the INTERSTATE from the shields as it doesn't really render
all that well at
Steve, are you still accepting other
requests on areas that need to be updated? I would suggest Northern
Ontario between Toronto and Sudbury. On both the Ontario 69 and
Ontario 11 highway corridors, brand new expressway alignments are
being built in several different areas.
Hey guys, I'm curious, but how have you guys been tagging them when you add
them? I've been tagging them as highway=service ; access=official. I was
wondering if I was using the correct access tag so that routers wouldn't
route you onto them by accident. -- James
Here's an example for the people who didn't figure out what this was about:
http://g.co/maps/k4bgs. -- James ___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
I know one county (at least) in PA could use a refresh of Tiger data from the
2011 set. It's Crawford County. I've noticed SEVERAL roads are missing in
that county that either didn't get uploaded in the original Tiger imports, or
were deleted after the imports and I just can't find the
Just was able to get JoePranevich
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JoePranevich (who was #606 on the prolific
contributor USA list) to agree today. Just sent him a PM via OSM this morning,
and less than 6 hours later, he's agreed and it saves several things in
Pittsburgh as well as around
I think it might have gone down. In the java console, it's just saying Read
timed out for any of the tiles.___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
that it will only render zooms 16-19
over the US.
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:54 PM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
I think it might have gone down. In the java console, it's just saying Read
timed out for any of the tiles
Just wanted to let you guys know and give kudos to MapQuest for doing something
that Google hasn't done with their maps EVER. MapQuest is either fully reading
the ref tag or using the tags from relations, but they are now properly
showing Business Interstates and Truck US Highways now on
Yikes. I'll tweet them about that one.
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:49:41 -0500
From: nerou...@gmail.com
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps
Oops - bad pattern matching finding I in RI :)
I've been having so-so success on contacting people in the US. I've sometimes
just looked around on the License Change map across the US (and in a few places
in Canada like Toronto since I lived there for a bit) and just contact the
people I find that show up when I click on the names. I've
Can somebody PLEASE kill this spam that's been showing up the last few days?
I'd appreciate it. -- James ___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
So, who here has a LinkedIn account that they wouldn't mind using to contact a
few people to help try to save some data? I don't have an account there (yet)
because I don't have any use for one and thought that if somebody already had
one, they might be able to help out and attempt to contact
Add I-15 to that list as well as not being in Canada.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.3441lon=-111.9452zoom=13layers=M
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
The 27th? Damn. I thought it was going to go read-only on the 1st... At least
that's what I've been telling people who I've been contacting to see if they
will accept the new CT (which is still being somewhat successful geting at
least 2-3 people a day to accept). Ugh. - James
Date: Wed,
Sorry, my bad. I saw another Steve A account in California that was
Undecided and thought that was your account since it edited in Fresno,
California.http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Steve_A And yes, I do agree a
possible push back at least a month would be helpful. Especially for South
I just saw this mentioned on MSNBC and thought I would let everybody know about
this since we would have to adjust the border in the future when it becomes
official. It seems that North Carolina will gain 150 feet of current South
Carolina. This will mostly cause problems in the Charlotte
Well, the database has just gone read-only at about 4:08 AM EDT. I was lucky
enough to finish the cleanup of the entire Pittsburgh, PA area minus some
businesses that people added that I couldn't verify since I hadn't been in
those parts of the city before or recently. So, they will get axed
On 4/1/2012 6:54 AM, Mike N wrote:
I also felt it was important to keep adding new stuff
instead of 100% on cleanup.
I did add new stuff as well. Mostly it was brand new sub-divisions that
were built after the original 2007 TIGER import that I spotted when cleaning
up other data. --
I just noticed that 99% of I-81 is going to be nuked in Tennessee just now
because of the change. Guess I found my project for the next few days till the
database is live again! Thank goodness that you can edit offline in JOSM.
Hopefully I can finish the I-81 rebuild off-line before the
download an area. -- James
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 08:24:44 -0400
From: nice...@att.net
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Update on remapping
On 4/1/2012 8:07 AM, James Mast wrote:
Hopefully I can finish the I-81 rebuild off-line before the database is
live so it can
FYI guys, the server is now back up and accepting edits. As for my TN I-81
rebuild, I got to just shy of Exit #50. I think that was pretty good over the
last few days doing it in my spare time. So, I'm uploading what I have done
and will continue on it from there. At least with being online
I just fixed the ref tag on all of the I-26 relations (I 26 26), so, those
should render correctly the next time any section of that route gets
re-rendered. -- James ___
Talk-us mailing list
Shield Rendering
* James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com [2012-04-12 09:40 -0400]:
You need to create shields up to at least in the 6000 range for
Kentucky. The reason I'm saying this is that the have a 6000 series for
small service roads.
[snip]
So, on the safe side for the KY routes, I
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:56:49 -0500
From: toby.mur...@gmail.com
To: stevea...@softworkers.com
CC: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Excellent progress, u.s.
I have noticed several people's remapping efforts in my live edit
viewer. Over towards the east, I see long
Well guys, as far as I know, as long as the non-CT user didn't add any tags to
the node, all you have to do is move said node to a new coordinate and it
should then be considered un-tainted. That's what I was told and that's what
happens on the OSM Inspector. Plus, if you're using the
I just saw this post on the rebuild list, so you guys might want to be a tad
careful when you're doing cleaning work by creating a new way and keeping the
old tainted nodes in it.
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/rebuild/2012-April/000206.html
Wow, this is messed up. I just took a look @ Google's imagery and it isn't
blacked out. Looking at it, I didn't see any reason for it to be blacked
out.. http://g.co/maps/yxrkg So, it must mean that somebody in Bing is
doing this for fun possibly. --James
I've just notice that the user SD Mapman has added in the ref tags several
hidden Interstates and removed what was originally in those tags (example:
ref=US 27 ref=I 124). It seems he's done this for all of the hidden
Interstates.http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SD%20Mapman/edits?page=5
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:53:11 -0400
From: nice...@att.net
To: t...@openstreetmap.org; talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] new bing hires updates not visible in JOSM?
On 6/13/2012 5:58 PM, Jonas Häggqvist wrote:
Remove bing.attribution.xml from the cache dir:
Well, I've started work on repairing I-26 in TN right now myself. -James
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Very nice Kai. However, I'd like to suggest a few more cities that might be of
use for that.
Pittsburgh
Cleveland
Las Vegas
Toronto, Ontario (mainly because you added Winnipeg)
-James
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 20:28:16 -0700
From: kakrue...@gmail.com
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Just thought I would give you a heads up guys, but a new guy to the project has
been doing some major damage to the Downtown Charlotte, NC area putting in a
ton of fictional stuff, as well as deleting highways (most of I-277 was deleted
by him). I've already shot over an e-mail to the OSMF
Well, Frederik Ramm has put a block on him, and he's currently reverting the
changes he did (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12409691). So,
hopefully in a little while, Charlotte should be safe to edit once again. ;)
-James
I think they are waiting till the OSM database is odbl-clean officially first
before updating again. ___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
When it comes to Interstates multiplexing, I think we should list first the one
that the exit numbers are for on the highway. Some examples would be as
follows: ref=I 76;I 70 on the PA Turnpike since I-76 is the main route and
all the exits along there use I-76's mileage.ref=I 77;I 74 in NC
I came across a similar interchange on I-485 in NC here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.273736lon=-80.966209zoom=18layers=M
I think the way I did it would work the best using the only_straight_on
restriction. -James
Thanks for the heads up. While he hasn't done anything in the Pgh area, I did
notice this one section of US-19 in WV he upgraded from Trunk to Motorway in
Changeset 12698753. (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12698753)
I've traveled US-19 between I-79 and I-77/I-64 over 50 times
Maybe we should allow NE2 back in here so he can also comment on this. Also, as
far as I know, he had nothing to do with any SR tags in California, but I'm
not 100% sure. --James ___
Talk-us mailing list
If I think I know who this is all about, maybe he should be un-banned from
talk-us so he might be able to defend himself at least? --James
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
. On moderation,
maybe, but so long as the emails are eventually going through that
seems okay.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:16 PM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
If I think I know who this is all about, maybe he should be un-banned from
talk-us so he might be able to defend himself
I was just looking at their tiles tonight and they've updated them to include
state shields!! Saw shields for PA, SC, MD, VA, WV, CA, and NY for starters.
Maybe now we should all agree to use the proper state abbreviation for the
ref tags on the ways instead of not having them at all
I've also noticed that they are using their own state border files instead of
the ones in OSM. Here's an example of this at the WV/VA crossing of WV-9/VA-9:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.26253lon=-77.7658zoom=16layers=Q You
can still see the OSM border there, but it isn't as defined as
I personally think that the letter shouldn't be stored in the ref tags on the
ways as they could be considered as an internal designation that just happens
to make it onto the route shields. Maybe the letters could be added as an
additional tag like ref:txdot=I 35-V? They are so small that
Martijn, I have an idea for a new MapRoulette project and want your opinion on
the idea. How about highways that intersect motorways (w/ or without a point
there)? I know several rural motorways here in the US still don't have bridges
added for either the crossing highway or the motorway
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 15:51:43 -0500
From: dygitulju...@gmail.com
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute
At the risk of sounding like I'm defending NE2, one of Ian's points is that
NE2 is banned from the list and that discussing this, here, does
I just happened to spot a place where there is a possible coping from Google
Maps.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/mc/?mt0=mapnikmt1=googlemapmakerlon=-75.5301lat=40.07484zoom=16
While it doesn't look exact on the curves, the places where the ramps
start/end/merge seems to be an exact match to
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:37:00 -0500
From: dale.p...@gmail.com
To: claysmal...@gmail.com
CC: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com; talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Possible coping from Google Maps
I see it shows up on google mapmaker, but not google maps except at high zoom
as
#I_think_someone.27s_been_entering_copyrighted_data_-_how_do_we_deal_with_that.3F
Cheers, Brad
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:18 AM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
The user who added the interchange has no GPS traces listed for his account.
--James
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:05
#I_think_someone.27s_been_entering_copyrighted_data_-_how_do_we_deal_with_that.3F
Cheers, Brad
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:18 AM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
The user who added the interchange has no GPS traces listed for his account.
--James
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:05:52
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 09:18:54 -0500
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Possible coping from Google Maps
From: o...@inbox.org
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:52 PM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
Just got a message back from him and it confirmed my worst fears
Is anybody else having any problems right now accessing it in JOSM? I keep
getting Error messages instead of the tiles. -James
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Just happened to come across the other night a user (mjbyars) who has been
upgrading the highways type when it shouldn't be. For instance, he's upgrading
several state highways from secondary to primary when they have no business
being upgraded that high, especially with a near by parallel US
http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/collapsed-i-5-bridge-gone-google-maps-almost-quickly-it-6C10067906
If I remember correctly, we had it marked as access=no and the segment
removed about an hour faster than on Google. Somebody needs to get ahold of
Rosa from NBC (who did the article) and let
Well, when I did my original edit in that area because of the collapse,
somebody had already deleted the small section that collapsed. So, I just
added the missing access=no tags on the other ways.
Plus, it didn't hurt that I was on my PC already and watching the local 11PM
(EDT) news and
This user has been brought to my attention with him gun-jumping highways
marking them as open when they aren't yet (I-74/US-311 [1] - I've already fixed
this one), or adding completely fictional alignments for highways that aren't
even under-construction yet or proposed (I-66 in IN [2], and
Well, it seems Changeset: 16397959 is legit (minus the missing changeset
comment) since I-269 IS under-construction in that area, well, at least on the
MS side for sure.
http://www.desototimes.com/articles/2013/03/23/news/doc514cf7ea1d8d0663837988.txt
-James
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 08:34:18 -0400
From: nice...@att.net
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute, NE2
On 6/12/2013 7:53 AM, Josh Doe wrote:
I'm
disappointed that the above recommendation didn't acknowledge that NE2
has done good work. I would
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:15:02 -0400
From: phi...@pobox.com
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] ref tags
* Clay Smalley claysmal...@gmail.com [2013-06-20 09:26 -0700]:
Also, even if it were the case that they were the same network, it makes
sense to keep them
Not bad! Does this mean that any new relations would automatically be added to
the page (like one for the new I-2 in TX when it's posted this year)?
Also, thanks to that new Interstate page, I noticed right away that the I-495
(DE) relation's ref tags weren't correct (it had ref=I 495 (DE)).
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 15:28:12 -0400
From: phi...@pobox.com
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] ref tags
* James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com [2013-06-22 07:22 -0400]:
the segment of I-26 between I-240 and Exit #9 is still considered to
be a Future Interstate
I'll let his comments here[1] on a note page speak.
- James
[1] - http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/note/3173
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
.
Not likely, but imaginable.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
I prefer the modifier proposal, since it prevents Future from being confused
with a county level network.
On Jun 24, 2013 11:16 PM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
Later
US:CA:San_Bernardino, or a city, like US:OK:Tulsa:Tulsa...
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 5:49 PM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
Wouldn't the Business routes of Interstates count as 'children'?
From: m...@rtijn.org
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:07:52 -0600
To: ba...@ursamundi.org
CC
getting to that level of specificity?
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 9:34 PM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
I thought the modifier would be the type of Business route? Remember, we do
have Business Spurs and Business Loops for Interstate highways. Sometimes
both types in the same city
So, does anybody else have any more comments on how we should deal with tagging
these Future Interstates? I just remembered there was one other
Interstate in NC posted this way, I-295 [1] in Fayetteville, NC. So, I've
fixed that relation as well to follow the network way I originally
I'm just curious, but how are you going to add shields for all of the Turnpikes
out there that have their shield posted alongside another route shield (like
the PA Turnpike, New York Thruway, Ohio Turnpike as examples)? Will there need
to be some tweaks to the relations for those said routes
Jul 2013 08:40:58 -0400
From: phi...@pobox.com
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations
* James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com [2013-07-09 01:40 -0400]:
So, does anybody else have any more comments on how we should deal with
tagging these Future
relations,
one for each direction. -James
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:14:40 -0400
From: phi...@pobox.com
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Update on highway shield rendering
* James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com [2013-07-10 03:18 -0400]:
I'm just curious, but how
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:40:22 -0400
From: phi...@pobox.com
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Update on highway shield rendering
* James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com [2013-07-10 09:22 -0400]:
I could fix the PA Turnpike relation with the US:PA:Turnpike network
Well, I've found a bug in the rendering engine.
What's up with these US 1-9 shields?
http://elrond.aperiodic.net/shields/?zoom=16lat=35.52081lon=-79.18442layers=B
Is it because there are two different US 1 relations tagged on those ways?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/11177
No
Is there picture proof of how they are signing it?
-James
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:43:47 -0400
From: kken...@nycap.rr.com
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
Given
I know that there is a US 1-9 in NJ, but this error is showing up in NC. ;)
-James
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:07:17 -0500
From: toby.mur...@gmail.com
CC: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Update on highway shield rendering
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:44 AM, James Mast rickmastfa
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Update on highway shield rendering
* James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com [2013-07-10 10:44 -0400]:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/172380289
There are some interesting things going on here.
Is this road really part of both US
on highway shield rendering
* James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com [2013-07-10 10:44 -0400]:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/172380289
There are some interesting things going on here.
Is this road really part of both US 21 and US 21 Bypass? That seems weird
to me, but if someone
Done. Changed it to README=*. Thanks for that suggestion. -James
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:30:06 -0400
From: rwe...@averillpark.net
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Update on highway shield rendering
On 7/11/13 4:20 PM, James Mast wrote:
Just so you know Phil, I've
(need to
scroll down some)
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 19:23:52 -0400
From: kken...@nycap.rr.com
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations
On 07/11/2013 01:57 PM, James Mast wrote:
Is there picture proof of how they are signing it?
Would http
Nah, the best place to test route shield hell is in GA. :) hehe.
http://elrond.aperiodic.net/shields/?zoom=14lat=30.85477lon=-82.01919layers=B
Still, I think detour routes might be a good idea, but only if somebody is
willing to keep track of the projects and fix everything once the
Maybe we could add a ref:year tag?
-James
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 19:07:53 -0500
From: ba...@ursamundi.org
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-us] US Historic Route shield rendering
I'm wondering if we can broaden the tagging for US Historic Route 66 and
perhaps retag the existing
Hey Phil. Found another little bug. That or you forgot to add this in, not
sure.
In GA, it seems you're not supporting the US:GA:Connector network. I just
had added the :Connector part to a relation for GA-40 Connector, and then all
the GA-40 shields disappeared from the way and
I've seen some data in there that I clearly added back in March of 2012 in the
Pittsburgh, PA area (new exit numbers on PA-28). So, the data isn't 4 years
old like some people suggest.
-James
___
Talk-us
I'm curious, but has a solution been found for the problem with the PA Turnpike
because of having to split up the ways into separate ones for each direction
because of the relation getting close to the 1000 way limit we've imposed?
I still think that using the super relation I created to tie
2013 23:30:24 -0500
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Shields are up!
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:44 PM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
I'm curious, but has a solution been found for the problem with the PA Turnpike
because of having to split up the ways
After hands down. That's how I do intersections like that with one minor
difference. If the road on the right (as in the example) doesn't have a
divider, I merge the ways before leaving the intersection so I would have 3
traffic light nodes instead of 4.
-James
Chris, the QEW has three destinations on the counterclockwise direction. In
addition to having Niagara and Fort Erie, between Toronto and Hamilton, it's
posted for Hamilton. After Hamilton, it then becomes Niagara. I should know,
I've traveled the QEW several times in my life.
-James
From:
From: marti...@telenav.com
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:40:11 -0600
To: nel...@crynwr.com
CC: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Complex intersection mapping
One followup question I do have is about one of the other examples of
elaborate intersections Minh raised, the
I'm one of the Admins on the forums for that site.
If you want to pop onto the forums, we have a thread there dedicated to OSM.
http://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=4420.0
When/If you register @ the forums, I can personally fast track your account
activation. Just shoot me a message
From: marti...@telenav.com
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 11:31:55 -0500
To: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
CC: ste...@telenav.com; krist...@telenav.com; robe...@telenav.com;
chr...@telenav.com; talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Complex intersection mapping
James,
Thanks for the
I'm just curious, but what's everybody's opinion on this? I know it's
acceptable for the Interstates (some are setup this way, some aren't) since
they are all divided, but what about for US Highways and State Highways? I
know that we want to eventually have the cardinal directions in OSM for
Well, one of the main reasons I brought this up is because I've noticed another
user changing some relations from forward/backward to
west/east/south/north without discussing this here on talk-us. That user
would happen to be KristenK. This user has been doing this since the 11th at
least
From: lordsu...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 03:27:21 -0500
To: marti...@telenav.com
CC: krist...@telenav.com; talk-us@openstreetmap.org; h...@telenav.cn;
vladim...@telenav.com; chr...@telenav.com
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US State
highways.
So, nobody has a comment on my idea (from the 22nd) of getting JOSM to show
north/south or east/west splits in the relation editor to be displayed the same
way as the forward/backward gets shown already? I would try to do some coding
to allow that to happen in JOSM, but I don't know how to
be.
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 6:14 AM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
So, nobody has a comment on my idea (from the 22nd) of getting JOSM to show
north/south or east/west splits in the relation editor to be displayed the
same way as the forward/backward gets shown already? I would try
However, with the split Interstates (I-35W/I-35E in both TX and MN
I-69E/I-69C/I-69W in TX) US Highways (and a few state highways), the letters
are part of the route number. So, they wouldn't have any effect on the role
part for relations. When given routing info, they'd act just like
We also have to come up with a way to designate hidden segments of a route so
we don't have to have two separate relations for highways that have segments
that are hidden.
Some of the examples I'm thinking of are like US-52 in MN when it's on I-94 and
US-19 Trunk here in Pittsburgh, PA while
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
