Of Joseph Norton via Talk
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2017 1:33 PM
To: 'Pamela Dominguez'; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'; 'Steve Nutt'
Subject: RE: Going Backward in Accessibility?
Actually, in Office 2016, it's even easier than that.
All you have to do is press alt-q
7 1:33 PM
To: 'Pamela Dominguez'; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'; 'Steve Nutt'
Subject: RE: Going Backward in Accessibility?
Actually, in Office 2016, it's even easier than that.
All you have to do is press alt-q and you'll be placed in the "Tell me wh
February 2017 2:39 AM
To: 'Joseph Norton'; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Subject: Going forward not RE: Going Backward in Accessibility?
Why is it that we keep putting out these negative subject lines.
>From my point of view Window Eyes is still working, it is still
inn@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf
Of Joseph Norton via Talk
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2017 1:33 PM
To: 'Pamela Dominguez'; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'; 'Steve Nutt'
Subject: RE: Going Backward in Accessibility?
Actually, in Office 2016, it's even easier than th
Steve Jacobson
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nutt [mailto:st...@comproom.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 10:38 AM
To: steve.jacob...@visi.com; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Going Backward in Accessibility?
Hi Steve,
I would disagree. I can often find things in
From: Talk
>> [mailto:talk-bounces+steve=comproom.co...@lists.window-eyes.com]
>> On Behalf Of Steve Jacobson via Talk
>> Sent: 15 January 2017 20:29
>> To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
>> Subject: RE: Going Backward in Accessibility?
>>
>> Ste
steve=comproom.co...@lists.window-eyes.com]
On Behalf Of Steve Jacobson via Talk
Sent: 15 January 2017 20:29
To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Going Backward in Accessibility?
Steve,
This is a useful tip, and I was not trying to assume anything. My point,
though, was that we a
: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Going Backward in Accessibility?
Steve,
This is a useful tip, and I was not trying to assume anything. My point,
though, was that we adopt strategies to be efficient that may depend upon a
number of less obvious features of programs.
One thing, in Becky if you wish read-to-end to work again, you can
change, under general settings, the third page of options, (message view),
the HTML option that "convert to plain text, to use, instead, the IE5
view which is the second from the top of 3 radio buttons.
Then your read-to-end keys ar
To: peter Chin ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Going Backward in Accessibility?
For years, Music keybords have ben off limits due to those screens.
I haven't looked at keyboards for about four years now, but before then,
there was a huge amount of memorization required to use so
For years, Music keybords have ben off limits due to those screens.
I haven't looked at keyboards for about four years now, but before then,
there was a huge amount of memorization required to use some keyboards.
And no matter what was memorized on other keyboards, they would be off
limits to
Pamela Dominguez via Talk
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2017 2:34 PM
To: Steve Nutt ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Going Backward in Accessibility?
Tab to what? And do what? I have never seen any tell me what to do edit
box. Pam.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nutt via Talk
Sent
ssion List'
Subject: RE: Going Backward in Accessibility?
Hi Steve,
You're assuming though that everyone has to go the long way round to access
ribbons and options within them.
In Office for example, you don't need to access the ribbon when you can't
find something. Just bring
Tab to what? And do what? I have never seen any tell me what to do edit
box. Pam.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nutt via Talk
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2017 1:48 PM
To: steve.jacob...@visi.com ; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Going Backward in Accessibility?
]
On Behalf Of Steve Jacobson via Talk
Sent: 13 January 2017 16:53
To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Going Backward in Accessibility?
Peter and all,
While I mostly agree with you, especially given that we have fairly good
accessibility built into products that are much
to play music are going to face
similar difficulties with touch screens being implemented.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Jacobson via Talk
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2017 12:53 AM
To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Going Backward in Accessibility?
Peter and all
t;>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/14/2017 9:16 AM, Russ Kiehne via Talk wrote:
>>> And lets take a look at what Apple did with the current version of
>>> Itunes.
>>> It's not nearly as accessible as it was in version 11.
>>>
>>> -
, January 13, 2017 7:58 AM
To: wohlg...@gmail.com ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Going Backward in Accessibility?
Hi Jim,
There are all kinds of examples. In Becky, I once had the ability to
Read to End, and now I no longer have this ability.
Numerous Web Sites that once w
Hi all.
I agree with Chris to a point. We have more accessible programs than in the
past, however, things could be better. I approach things with the saying, if
you want to attract flies, it's better to use honey than vinegar. We need to
convince manufacturers of software and other electroni
Thanks, Chris. Your knowledge and positivity are wonderful! Thanks,
Trish
-Original Message-
From: Chris Skarstad via Talk
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2017 9:59 AM
To: Russ Kiehne ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Going Backward in Accessibility?
and the wo-is-me party
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Talk
> [mailto:talk-bounces+john_farley=btinternet@lists.window-eyes.com] On
> Behalf Of Bryan Peterson via Talk
> Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2017 4:22 PM
> To: Chris Skarstad; Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Goin
@lists.window-eyes.com] On
Behalf Of Bryan Peterson via Talk
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2017 4:22 PM
To: Chris Skarstad; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Going Backward in Accessibility?
It's a valid concern.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 14, 2017, at 8:59 AM, Chris Skarstad via Tal
iginal Message- From: Dave via Talk
>> Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 7:58 AM
>> To: wohlg...@gmail.com ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
>> Subject: Re: Going Backward in Accessibility?
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> There are all kinds of examples. In Becky, I
current version of
Itunes. It's not nearly as accessible as it was in version 11.
-Original Message- From: Dave via Talk
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 7:58 AM
To: wohlg...@gmail.com ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Going Backward in Accessibility?
Hi Jim,
There are all kin
Going Backward in Accessibility?
Hi Jim,
There are all kinds of examples. In Becky, I once had the ability to
Read to End, and now I no longer have this ability.
Numerous Web Sites that once were reasonably accessible, now require
more effort on my part to find the same information.
Ebay is a s
far...@btinternet.com ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Going Backward in Accessibility?
Hi there Dave and Group!
Dave, can you site some examples of what you are talking about -2 steps
forward and 3 back or 3 forward and 2 back? I have been using
Window-Eyes since version 5.1 and every
I totally agree with you Dave regarding software and appliances.
It is impossible for me to use our large convection microwave because,
depending how fast the knob is turned,the time setting jumps by
differing amounts. Instead, I had to purchase a simple smaller microwave
with a glass panel a
eter Duran
-Original Message-
From: Talk
[mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] On
Behalf Of Steve Jacobson via Talk
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 11:53 AM
To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Going Backward in Accessibility?
Peter and all,
You are so right, and have you looked at stereo systems lately? Same
old, same old, read the display.
73
Butch
WA0VJR
Node 3148
Wallace, ks.
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017, Dave via Talk
wrote:
Hi Jim,
There are all kinds of examples. In Becky, I once had the ability to
Read to End, and now I no lo
Peter and all,
While I mostly agree with you, especially given that we have fairly good
accessibility built into products that are much more complicated than those
of fifteen or twenty years ago, I think we are often affected more by change
than are sighted people. There needs to be some thought
Hi Jim,
There are all kinds of examples. In Becky, I once had the ability to
Read to End, and now I no longer have this ability.
Numerous Web Sites that once were reasonably accessible, now require
more effort on my part to find the same information.
Ebay is a simple example. I once could
Hi Peter,
I enjoyed your post very much. Having just completed my 19th Window-Eyes app,
I do hope that whatever Windows screen readers survive, I hope it will be as
easy to write apps for them as It has been for me to do with Window-Eyes.
Keep up the good work, and all the best. (smile)
Peace
Are you using windows ten? Window eyes does not perform as it did in
previous versions of windows. The mouse pointer and invisible curser are
nearly useless! In my case, I have to use the rename folder or file
function in order to find out how the folder or file is spelled. Can't
do it no long
Hi there Dave and Group!
Dave, can you site some examples of what you are talking about -2 steps
forward and 3 back or 3 forward and 2 back? I have been using
Window-Eyes since version 5.1 and every major update has given a great
deal more functionality to the program as well as the user as f
that's how life goes, folks. Change is inevitable and you have to
figure out how to go with it.
Whining on an email list ain't gonna solve jack.
.
On 1/12/2017 11:03 AM, John Farley via Talk wrote:
And do you think that the world of television, domestic appliances,
automobiles etc. are any
And do you think that the world of television, domestic appliances,
automobiles etc. are any different.
The VI community are not immune from change.
Regards, John
Tel: +44 (0) 1442 259243
Mob: +44 (0) 7815 056076
-Original Message-
From: Talk
[mailto:talk-bounces+john_farley=btinter
36 matches
Mail list logo
