filip wolters wrote:
Weet iemand of er een functie of weetje bestaat om de huisnummers mooi
langs de straten te laten lopen?
En als dit niet bestaat er een voorstel/ticket aangemaakt is?
Er is een proposed feature: het Karlsruhe schema
Kristoff Bonne wrote:
Hello,
Eventjes een ander vraagje;
Ik heb dit niet gevonden op de wiki, maar misschien heb ik niet goed
gezocht.
Kan iemand me eens uitleggen hoe dat men precies een straat die uit
meerdere stukken bestaat moet ingeven op online kaart-editor?
Indien een straat
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:47:31 +, Karel Adams ade...@skynet.be wrote:
Further to Gauthier's message relating to Belgian Railways: it seems
obvious to me that LINE NUMBERS should be published, not train
indicators. Compare to bars/cafés: we should mention the NAME of the
place, not what
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:11:15 +0100, Luc Van den Troost
luc.a...@gmail.com
wrote:
Another 'historical' point is that it is a pitty that OSM doesn't offer
a kind of 'time-machine'. On one side it would be nice to see the growth
of OSM that way, on the other side the map we are currently making
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:36:21 +0100, Erik Daems erik.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
De link http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle is inderdaad
redelijk compleet, maar toch vooral op een Engelse + stedelijke
situatie geschoeid. Bij ons bestaan er veel tussenvormen, maar waar
trek je dan de grens om
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:41:38 +0200, Renaud MICHEL
r.h.michel+...@gmail.com wrote:
Le mardi 10 août 2010 à 10:22, Tim Francois a écrit :
+1. Yup, this is what is currently happening in most of the UK - a
separate relation for the 'up' and 'down' bus routes, so that
forwards/backwards (which is
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:56:28 +0200, Ivo De Broeck
ivo.debro...@gmail.com wrote:
What i propose is keeping the existing relation for the normal
direction.
There is no normal direction with buses.
Example stadsbus nr 8 go from Bertem - Leuven - Bierbeek (check the
relation with the relation
http://tweakers.net/nieuws/70621/dienstregeling-de-lijn-vanaf-2011-in-google-maps.html
Tja...
Maarten
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:03:43 +0100, Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com
wrote:
2010/11/22 Luc Van den Troost
Eigenlijk leert volgens mij deze discussie een belangrijk ding,
namelijk dat er aan duidelijke documentatie nood is.
Karel Adams is toch al een tijdje met OSM bezig. 'basic dingen'
Kenny Moens wrote:
Hello guys,
In the region where I live (Hulshout), some of the borders are recently
mapped, but they don't follow the exact features which form the border.
For example, in the area between Ramsel and Westmeerbeek the city border
follows the Steenkensbeek which I recently
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:41:25 +0100, Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com
wrote:
I usually tag these small ways between two lanes of a dual carriage
road with the same classification of the crossing roads, in this case
highway=unclassified. But there's no strict rule on this AFAIK, even
though we
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:25:11 +0100, Paul Cardinaels wrote:
Hello all,
I'm busy to bingify Belgium, my main focus for the time being are my
two home towns:
Hoogstraten (and let's not forget Eimai's big contribution):
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.4474lon=4.7686zoom=12layers=M
[1]
filip wolters wrote:
Wat me opviel tijdens het bingen, is dat er een andere foto getoond
wordt naargelang het level waarop je inzoomt.
Een voorbeeld vind je aan de Rostockweg in de Antwerpse haven. Op het
ene level staan er gebouwen en het andere niet. ( JOSM )
Dat heb ik ook op een plek
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:51:47 +0100, Andre Engels wrote:
2011/2/16 Luc Van den Troost luc.a...@gmail.com:
Volgens OSM ligt hier
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.854451lon=3.985033zoom=18layers=M
outer airport
Edited by xybot at 2010-12-17T21:14:15Z
Edited by bcrosby at 2010-12-17T00:53:45Z
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:04:56 +0200, Ben Laenen wrote:
Ralf Hermanns wrote:
I think there is conflicting information here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative and
here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Boundaries
On the
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:22:28 +0200, Andre Engels wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
Don't have much time to reply, so a short one:
Always look at the country specific page to get the answers. The
international
page is just there for some guiding
On 11-1-2012 18:14, Jo wrote:
Deze mail heb ik verstuurd naar rendle:
[knip]
Eerlijk gezegd vind ik onderstaande mail nogal sarcastisch en
vingertjeswijzend. Jij doet het fout en dat is jouw schuld is de
boodschap die ik er in lees.
IMHO schiet dat het doel mijlenver voorbij. Ik heb ook
On 2012-05-23 11:44, Teddy wrote:
Hello,
I have fix some routing problems 15km around Charleroi.
I see that OSM Inspector don't expose the problems in real time.
Wath is the refresh time on OSM Inspector ?
Below the map it says Data from ...
Presently it is on 2012-05-22 19:46:02 (UTC) and
On 2012-06-14 10:01, Nicolas Pettiaux wrote:
What where these silly edits ?
How many amongst the edits were silly ?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1784899252/history
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1784898875/history
On 2012-08-02 23:37, eMerzh wrote:
Hello everybody ..
i was playing a bit with the OSM routing machine at
http://map.project-osrm.org/ ,
one of the best router based on osm.
I discovered that a lot of routing decisions where not optimal and i
found that the lack of maxspeed was often the cause
On 2012-09-13 12:10, Joren DC wrote:
I fixed almost all problems in the state Antwerp. I only have 4 red
dots left.
Can somebody take a look at this strange situation:
I drove across the N60e near Peruwelz [1] which has a autoweg (route
pour automobile) sign. According to the wiki [2] this should be mapped
as trunk. Currently it is a secondary road.
What is the best option here? Make it trunk or add a motorway=yes tag?
Regards,
Maarten
[1]
On 2014-12-30 16:33, Ben Laenen wrote:
On Tuesday 30 December 2014 11:09:12 Maarten Deen wrote:
I drove across the N60e near Peruwelz [1] which has a autoweg (route
pour automobile) sign. According to the wiki [2] this should be mapped
as trunk. Currently it is a secondary road.
What
On 2015-01-02 12:14, Marc Gemis wrote:
Ik zou er langs deze weg iedereen willen op wijzen dat het gevaarlijk
is om stukken weg samen te voegen tot 1 geheel. Zeker als dit gebeurt
door de oude weg weg te smijten en een nieuwe te tekenen. Het heeft
ook geen enkel nut. In de meeste gevallen zijn de
On 2015-01-02 13:54, Glenn Plas wrote:
Hoi Sander,
Hebben we over hetzelfde hier ? JOSM gaat u wel een dialoog geven hoor
dat de tags verschillen. De user krijgt de merge window open. Het is
aan de user om daarin te beslissen.
Je krijgt die dialoog alleen als de tags verschillen. Als een
Peter Childs wrote:
Speed limits tend to apply to zones not roads anyway, it just happens
that most people only drive on the road. Oh and you will find Speed
I disagree. How would you define the zone in this example?
I haven't seen this anywhere, but it seems that Google is updating its
satellite
maps with even higher resolution data.
Compare what I previously knew as best resolution:
http://maps.google.nl/maps?f=qsource=s_qhl=nlgeocode=ie=UTF8ll=51.835292,5.859522spn=0.001566,0.003272t=kz=19
with this:
Cartinus wrote:
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 07:44:54 Maarten Deen wrote:
I've searched the wiki and I have used the tag myself, but there seems to
be no documentation for restriction= ?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Thanks, I knew it was somewhere, but the wiki search
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Sábado, 30 de Mayo de 2009, Paul Houle escribió:
I just got a Garmin Etrex Vista HCx that I'd like to use for viewing
Openstreetmaps and for creating tracks I can upload. I'm about to buy
an SD card for this: how big of a card do I need to hold Openstreetmaps?
Joe Richards wrote:
I've been enjoying sketching/tracing from Yahoo aerial imagery in Potlatch
(hey some people knit or do crosswords, I find _this_ relaxing!). I recently
discovered that the default 'highway' tag for roads taken from imagery is
highway=road (_not_ highway=unclassified as
Ingo Lantschner wrote:
anyone here, who has experiences on using Garmins nüvi 550 for
collecting data and exporting this for use in OSM?
I have a Nüvi 205 and have found the trackpoint placing rather sparse. The
strategy seems to be on chaninging occurences, not every x meters or x
seconds and
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Peter Dörrie wrote:
The current renderes wouldn't be able to handle it either and forcing 50+
applications to change would be unappropriate.
Why, we're doing that all the time ;-)
There are many unsolved questions here. For example: What happens if
parts of
80n wrote:
The server running the xapi service is down at the moment.
Any info on what the problem is and when it's going to be resolved?
And what is the status of the other two XAPI servers?
Bearstech seems to be perpetually testing, and xapi.openstreetmap still serves
0.5 data and 0.6
Andy Allan wrote:
Good work, long overdue. I would make some suggestions:
* The model name could have the links from the Detailed
description, saving width
That's what I thought too. I added the Nüvi details without the extra Detailed
description but with the links in the model name. But
David Earl wrote:
On 24/06/2009 00:43, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
greg...@arenius.com wrote:
What do people think?
I think why bother. Clearly what we have is chaotic, but any system
you can think of will become chaotic sooner or later with people
(ab)using it to their heart's content, so
Pieren wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Richard Fairhurstrich...@systemed.net
wrote:
Arguing over the presentation on the wiki isn't really the issue. What the
tags are, and how they're documented, are two separate things. But like Ævar
says, talk is cheap, and though many of us feel
Celso González wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 07:00:55PM +0100, Christoph Böhme wrote:
Thomas Wood grand.edgemas...@gmail.com schrieb:
Can we ban it, the stuff its uploading is completely useless.
(single nodes with only note tags and no other useful metadata)
All the nodes I have looked
Ivan Garcia wrote:
Hi, I've just realized that the list of languages displayed in the wiki of
openstreetmap.org shows 'Espanol' instead of 'Español' (correct), can you
guys fix this?
Fixed.
Regards,
Maarten
___
talk mailing list
SteveC wrote:
On 1 Jul 2009, at 17:48, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Miércoles, 1 de Julio de 2009, Mike Collinson escribió:
Last year we had some great Limerick poems for the Limerick State
Of the
Map Conference. This year, the format is the Haiku.
Maps maps
maps maps maps maps
maps!
Marc Coevoet wrote:
What _are_ you on about?
The *-ish give the maps of their country for free to OSM.
AND donated their data to OSM. And AND is a Dutch company.
Then the *ish buy a map company.
Well, TomTom has bought Teleatlas. But that is a different dutch than AND.
The *ish think
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Viernes, 24 de Julio de 2009, Andrew Gregory escribió:
Having said all that, *would* anyone be interested in a ~USD$200 640x480
geotagging camera and GPS logger?
I think I could buy a half-decent smartphone and a bluetooth GPS for *less*
than that money.
Or
Roy Wallace wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 2:57 PM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
As of time of writing maxheight is the only valid one and I don't think we
need or should have 2 tags to indicate the
same thing in 2 different ways.
I meant there's two ways of conceptualising the
Liz edodd at billiau.net wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Roy Wallace wrote:
By the way, you can't place a node under the bridge, unless it is
indeed shared by the bridge, as all ways have zero width (right?).
Logically you can as they are on different layers.
That is not going to work. There is
Roy Wallace wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Maarten Deenmd...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Having a node shared between a bridge and the way
underneath may solve one problem but introduces another (having to make a
relation to indicate this physical route is not present).
Agreed.
maxheight
Roy Wallace wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Maarten Deenmd...@xs4all.nl wrote:
IMHO it is not that important if the way with the limit is only just beneath
the bridge, or is somewhat longer or is applied to nodes on either side of a
bridge.
I recently came across this example where
Simone Cortesi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 09:21, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmasonava...@gmail.com
wrote:
Does OSM invalidates GPS data after some time? Otherwise, roads
continuously changes and after we will have a big cloud of points that
don't make any sense.
No, it doesn't. GPX tracks stay
John Smith wrote:
--- On Tue, 28/7/09, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
But there is no way to determine if a particular GPS track
is outdated. Sure,
you can look at the map and say I don't see a physical
road for this track,
but how would you identify GPS points of a track
Peter Miller wrote:
Many of the UK wiki pages with 'place' and 'slippery map' templates
are badly formatted, but not all.
This one is badly formatted:-
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Sussex
and this one as well:-
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/County_Durham
But this one is
Maarten Deen wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
Many of the UK wiki pages with 'place' and 'slippery map' templates
are badly formatted, but not all.
This one is badly formatted:-
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Sussex
and this one as well:-
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki
Florian Lohoff wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 08:44:32AM +0200, marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com
wrote:
In that one case it's okay.
Reason:
* There can only be ONE maxspeed on a road. ever!
Please add per direction on a road. Still waiting for a good way to tag
maxspeed per direction. What
marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:41:07 +0200, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Florian Lohoff wrote:
Not only in a corner. In Germany the A3, going down the Elzer Berg (near
Limburg an der Lahn in the eastward direction) has a speedlimit of 40
km/h
Lennard wrote:
Exactly, it's a moot point, and I included it mostly to make the point
that there are so many subtle ways to handle maxspeed, that it would be
difficult to make an all-encompassing tagging scheme. At some point,
you'll just have to go with a generalized solution.
The general
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
And obviously you're also not travelling to Poland, otherwise you
would have seen this sign:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d6/Speedlimitsinpoland.png/424px-Speedlimitsinpoland.png
Nope, I haven't. And if I was driving past it I wouldn't know
OJ W wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 8:16 AM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
I also checked the Australian state borders and they are marked as
admin_level=4;10 which may interfere with things if the script was only
looking for a single number, however the boundary is used for local
Pieren wrote:
I'm currently implementing the cadastre support in JOSM for the french
part of the island Saint-Martin shared with our Dutch friends (it is
a special projection).
The island is quite well mapped today, mostly from the hi-res Yahoo
imagery I guess:
Peter Körner wrote:
Hi
This looks a little like spam to me or at least like bad rendering rules
for tah.
Can anyone confirm one of these?
http://tah.openstreetmap.org/Browse/?layer=tilez=12x=3492y=1586
It looks to me like a lot of place=town nodes have been added that might very
well be
ad...@ticino.com wrote:
I have a question concerning POI's. How should i handel POI's reporting
this information DISTANCE: 518043.59 m, DISTANCE: 517980.06 m etc.
etc. (see http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=46.32lon=9.4203zoom=14)
Should I remove this POI's ?
I'd first ask the creator
I'm doing some relations on borders in Congo (the Democratic Republic of) and
see that a lot of ways (borders and highways) are double. Two ways exactly on
top of eachother, with their own nodes.
All way id's are in the 37.000.000's and appear to be created by user tmcw in a
few different
Andre Hinrichs wrote:
Hi List,
I just discovered, that the whole site seems to be down including
www,api,gpx
Hope, that mail is working. I will update the status at wiki to DOWN
now. Please change if site is available again.
Everything works from here. The map, the api, haven't uploaded
Peter Körner wrote:
Hello OSM folks
For the integration of osm into the wikipedia there will be localized
maps in all languages that have their own wikipedia. The problem is,
that a lot of countries are not translated yet.
To get an overview over the status and make translating those
Peter Körner wrote:
Hello OSM folks
For the integration of osm into the wikipedia there will be localized
maps in all languages that have their own wikipedia. The problem is,
that a lot of countries are not translated yet.
To get an overview over the status and make translating those
Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
here is an attempt to map a golf course:
http://xlquest.net/
the xml code is here:
http://bitbucket.org/lawgon/osmindia/
Looks nice, but I would like to suggest putting a green background over the
whole course, and only have light background where there is
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
Why doesn't OSM ever tell me to take a 270 degree turn into oncoming
traffic on a 6-lane highway and get onto the motorway_link on the
other side?
I just saw an item on OSM in (a rerun) of Quarks Co on the German TV station
WDR. It was about mapping the inner city of Bonn for wheelchairs. Nice example
of micromapping, where mappers were even measuring the height of the curbs and
inclination of streets (both very important for wheelchair
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:59 AM, wer-ist-roger juwelier-onl...@web.de
wrote:
Am Samstag 19 September 2009 schrieb Maarten Deen:
I just saw an item on OSM in (a rerun) of Quarks Co on the German TV
station WDR. It was about mapping the inner city of Bonn
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 15:18:50 +0300, Ciprian Talaba
cipriantal...@gmail.com
wrote:
From what I know Cloudmade's routing is not using turn restrinctions
(yet).
If you want something like this take a look at YOURS:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/YOURS.
I just tried YOURS for some turn
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:47:38 -0400, Joe Pranevich jpranev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to fix Hutchinson Island, Florida (
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=27.526lon=-80.2964zoom=14layers=B000FTF)
and the main issue is that the island's coastlines were very wrong.
(Roads
off the
Dan Putler wrote:
Exel) some people have been tagging ways. If there are areas with tags
with house number ranges, we'd like to have some idea of where they are
located. PAGC is currently shapefile centric (though this will change in
the longer run), so we would need to convert the ways to
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Simon Ward simon at bleah.co.uk wrote:
or a layer that allows you to select what POIs to display (although a
long list of POIs might be a little unwieldy).
This map already exists:
http://www.lenz-online.de/cgi-bin/osm/osmpoinit.pl/
That solution is
Tom Hughes wrote:
To make things a little clearer, we are actually blocking out four days
for this, from 20th to 23rd March. So don't count on being able to
upload anything during that period.
There is only one mapping party listed for that weekend on the wiki, and
it doesn't have any
Kim Hawtin wrote:
hi maning,
maning sambale wrote:
JOSM is an excellent data editing tool (hey I also love potlatch!).
Many of of its features I would love integrated in some FOSS GIS
editing toolbox.
That being said, are there user cases where JOSM is used outside OSM
as a GIS editing
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Etienne wrote:
We are going to keep the appeal open for at least a few more days.
We know there are more donations in the pipeline
Google Inc
Google Open Source Programs Office http://code.google.com/opensource/
2009-02-08 12:33:25
GBP 5,000.00
Wow.
With one
Shaun McDonald wrote:
On 8 Feb 2009, at 12:44, Ben Laenen wrote:
On Sunday 08 February 2009, Gary68 wrote:
in europe there are 202 ways with more than 1950 nodes. complete
lists can be found here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/SomeChecks
or the europe file directly:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Ben Laenen wrote:
OK, as long as there's no limit on the number of relation members, I'm
happy :-)
I'm pretty sure there will be, it is not implemented yet but I believe
we said it would be 1.000. Relations with more members become very hard
to work with.
So, we're
sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote:
David Earl wrote:
I can't help feeling the effort that I've noticed some contributors
are putting into manually changing oneway=yes to oneway=true
would be better spent doing something more useful.
Well, JOSM-search-type:way oneway:true
A nice way to rest my
sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote:
no
false
0
-1
all other values are ignored and treated as yes (why else would you have a
oneway-tag).
Ouch ! While using your software, I'll be extreamly carefull on the road ;-)
Don't want to be droven on an undefined or other or maybe oneway
Europe
D Tucny wrote:
It doesn't get down to streetnames at the moment and there is only one
country and 29 cities tagged with Catalan names...
That said, I'll add it to the list of things to look at changing next
time I do an import...
And don't forget name:carnaval. Okay, it is mostly
Stephan Plepelits wrote:
Hi Folks!
Some of you might already have noticed the OpenStreetBrowser, as I added
it to the list of GSoC-Projects, and I've been already writing on a page in
the OSM-Wiki for the last week.
I had a little bit too much time in the last months, so I started to write
David Ebling wrote:
I think a lot of you probably saw this news story:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bradford/7962212.stm
Yes. And rightly so that someone driving like that is charged.
I thought people might be interested to see the location on Multimap, which
has some nice bird's
Richard Mann wrote:
Map Features says that highway=cycleway should be used for ways that are
mainly/exclusively for bicycles. Does that mean that all those cycleways in
the Netherlands have (implicit) footways alongside, or that there are so few
pedestrians that the way can be regarded as
Renaud MICHEL wrote:
Le lundi 30 mars 2009 à 05:46, PAA a écrit :
Request for comments on creating the key:h and making it synonymous with
key:highway.
That's just ridiculous.
Don't start duplicating tags with the same meaning.
No it's not. It's called convenience.
And once you start with
Chris Hill wrote:
Maarten Deen wrote:
Can we implement this tomorrow?
When hell freezes over maybe.
I meant day after tomorrow BTW. Maybe that clears it up a bit.
Maarten
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
Gregory Williams wrote:
-Original Message-
From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Shaun McDonald
I have seen some people splitting roundabouts so that the bridge can
be shown properly.
Also, there's a roundabout that's split into
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Viernes, 17 de Abril de 2009, Heiko Jacobs escribió:
I'm searching a suitable english word for tagging this:
http://umverka.de/uvimg/messeschmal.jpg
I think that tracktype=grade3 or tracktype=grade4 will cover this issue. See
Joseph Scanlan wrote:
We often call it a wash around here (Las Vegas, Nevada (in the
southwest US)). Wikipedia, however, redirected me to arroyo.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wash_(creek)
Whatever name we use, it would be quite nice to have a tag for it.
Renderers, editors, etc.
I'm not on IRC, so I've got no idea, but anyone how the upgrade is going so far?
Regards,
Maarten
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Claudius wrote:
Am 19.04.2009 18:37, Jonas Krückel (John07):
Maarten Deen schrieb:
I'm not on IRC, so I've got no idea, but anyone how the upgrade is going so
far?
firefishy about 2h ago on twitter: migrating API 0.6 database - phase 5
(i started at the wrong number): re-creating
Ben Laenen wrote:
The server is now back into a usable state, if you want to start mapping
again.
Little warning though: relations are completely broken with Potlatch.
Don't do anything with relations in there until it's fixed or you may
completely destroy existing relations. In fact I
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:25:29AM +0200, Torsten Mohr wrote:
can anybody give me a hint on a GPS logger? I'd just like to track the
position on SD card.
It would be great if the battery would last for a week or even longer.
That should also be much cheaper than e.g. Garmin GPS devices.
OJ W wrote:
The NaviGPS isn't ideal if you're away from a source of power, since
its internal battery lasts about 1 day, and you can't just put spare
batteries into it.
It might be possible to get somewhere with a USB power-pack to
recharge it overnight (that's what I used for a 1-week trek,
Lambertus wrote:
Splitter tries to automatically determine the maximum tile size for a
specific area but the data in that area is giving Splitter false clues.
This might be caused by e.g. a combination of many POI's but few roads.
Not to diminish your work on that front, but I find the
Lambertus wrote:
Maarten Deen wrote:
Lambertus wrote:
Splitter tries to automatically determine the maximum tile size for a
specific area but the data in that area is giving Splitter false clues.
This might be caused by e.g. a combination of many POI's but few roads.
Not to diminish your
Is it ok to use barrier=toll_booth for portals over the road with cameras for
automated toll collection, like the ones used for LKW Maut (HGV toll) in
Germany?
To me, toll_booth indicates a physical barrier, and a portal is no barrier.
Regards,
Maarten
Is it possible that in the Xapi servers, the version attribute is only present
in nodes that have been changed after the 0.6 transition?
If I download data from Xapi, it is missing in most nodes, except for those
edited after 2009-04-28 (in my dataset).
I think this is quite an important issue
Stephan Plepelits wrote:
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 11:41:43AM +0200, Pieren wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Marc Schütz schue...@gmx.net wrote:
name=Bergstrasse
How do we know if the tag name is German ? Well, because it's a geo
db and we know where the element is. Make the live
Tal wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
But for roadnames, I do not see the point in using a different language
than
the one on the sign. If I tell someone to go to the Mountainroad in Vienna,
then they will probably end up in Wien, Austria, but where
Ben Laenen wrote:
So I'd say the problem is pretty easy to solve for street names:
* Either there's on official language and the street name shouldn't be
translated at all, even if you want a map in a different language. So
just take the name tag.
* Either there are more languages on the
Tal wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 07 May 2009, Tal wrote:
Imagine that you plan a business trip to Tel-Aviv and want to print
yourself a map of the city. Or maybe you'll be spending a week in
Cairo. Can you not see the benefit in
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Secondly (and apologies for being off topic) I have a couple of questions
about accommodation and travel in Germany. In the UK (as you may know)
there is bed and breakfast accommodation in private houses, typically
costing £20-40 a night. Is there similar style
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:50:04 +1100, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Steve Bennett wrote:
JOSM also seems
to be very slow when you have a largeish area loaded.
enlarge your Java VM
eg java -Xms1536m -Xmx1536m -jar /usr/share/josm/josm.jar
Is it just me or is there a limit
1 - 100 of 917 matches
Mail list logo
