Re: Outbox bug that over-rides macros for OpenPGP in Address Book templates

2005-12-15 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Mary, On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:48:16 -0600GMT (14-12-2005, 22:48 +0100, where I live), you wrote: MB Well, I have been writing about this for two days, ever since it Yes, I noticed, but I didn't have the time to reply to it before. MB In my logical, commonsense amateur view, the Outbox

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-15 Thread Vili
Hello Dwight, Drafts has hourglass icon, finished letters dont have. if they are parked, what do they have? Parked means draft, draft has hourglass. -- Vili The Bat 3.62.14 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Szervizcsomag 2 Current beta is

Re: Outbox bug that over-rides macros for OpenPGP in Address Book templates

2005-12-15 Thread George Mitchell
Roelof Otten wrote: MB It is not a new feature that I'm asking for. RO Yes, it is a new feature. Just because you don't understand what's RO causing the issue, doesn't mean it's a bug. IMO, this is a bug; just not one that has anything to do with templates. If you save, close and reopen a

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-15 Thread Vili
Hello Charlene, Why would anyone want to send the same mail twice in an automated routine? Hint: Because the recipient did not get the first copy? And why then does one have to automate this? It still is an exception that email doen't work. Ok, I see, why you think I am that hard

Re[2]: Drafts folder - what's the point?

2005-12-15 Thread Vili
Hello MAU, They won't, I give up. They are stubborn, blind and don't have the time to read our reasons. So, why waste our time and bother? I posted to Stefan that your purpose (as I understood it) in proposing a Draft folder, at this time, was that it was a more elegant, simpler, and

Re[3]: About TB folders

2005-12-15 Thread Vili
Hello Stefan, if they are parked, what do they have? Parking and draft are synonyms in Outbox. It's the same flag. That is what I am talking about, too. It is PARKED because it is DRAFT. -- Vili The Bat 3.62.14 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Szervizcsomag 2

Re: 3.63.12 bugs (mainly IMAP)

2005-12-15 Thread Eugene Gladchenko
Peter, PF Non-IMAP PF 4) Address book nicknames do no work Address book still doesn't work with LDAP servers properly. (See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4945). -- Eugene Gladchenko EVG15-RIPE Current beta is 3.63.09 |

Re: The Bat! 3.63.12 (Beta) is now available

2005-12-15 Thread Roland Burger
Hi 9Val, on Wednesday, December 14, 2005 at 23:03 you wrote in message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] among others: Hello All, The Bat! 3.63.12 (Beta) is now available from: http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/beta/tbb36312.rar After udating all Polish letters are not any more in my

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-15 Thread Vili
Hello Dwight, if they are parked, what do they have? Parking and draft are synonyms in Outbox. It's the same flag. I understand that, but I was hoping that Vili would finally have to admit that it was so and that he understood that as well. I DO admit that parked mails and draft mails

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-15 Thread Vili
Hello MAU, We at Ritlabs care for our users and want to protect you ('stupid' user) from inadvertently copying messages to the Outbox and unwillingly sending them out. For this reason we have made a big development effort using state of the art technology and we have included in our latest

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-15 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Stefan, Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 11:22:43 PM, you wrote: ST I don't have time to read all messages about the Draft folder. I don't ST understand why creation of a virtual folder cannot work for you? I haven't followed the discussion at all (and don't use the latest beta yet), but

Re: The Bat! 3.63.11 (Beta) is now available

2005-12-15 Thread Stuart Hemming
Must be shot down by TaskManager. ROFL. -- Stuart Hemming Using The Bat! v3.63.06 (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Aided by BayesIt! 0.8.4, MyGate v1.0, rss2pop3 v1.2, SpamPal v1.70, MyMacros 1.11a. Arguing with your Boss is like wrestling with a pig in mud. After a while

Two notes on Drafts folder BT wish and that is it all on my part

2005-12-15 Thread MAU
Hello all, Last night Stephan suggested the use of a VF as a 'replacement' for a real Drafts folder and I assume it was him, but I don't know, who uploaded two PNGs in BT to show 'how easy it is'. Well I have added two notes to BT that basically say: To whomever has uploaded the two PNGs

[The Bat! 3.63.12 (Beta)] Message cannot be sent

2005-12-15 Thread Volker Ahrendt
Hello, folks! Messages cannot be sent, if the name of the recipient in the address book is displayed Last name, first middle. I get the following error message: --- Edit Mail Message - Ahrendt, Dörte [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Message has not been sent.

Re: [The Bat! 3.63.12 (Beta)] Message cannot be sent

2005-12-15 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Thursday, December 15, 2005, Volker Ahrendt wrote: --- Edit Mail Message - Ahrendt, Dörte [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Message has not been sent. Server reply - bad address syntax: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Ahrendt --- OK

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-15 Thread MAU
Hello Vili, We at Ritlabs care for our users and want to protect you ('stupid' user) from inadvertently copying messages to the Outbox and unwillingly sending them out. For this reason we have made a big development effort using state of the art technology and we have included in our latest

Re: Drafts folder - what's the point?

2005-12-15 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Eugene! On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 12:02 AM, you wrote: MB My motto in using the various features of TB! is KISS. (Keep it MB simple, stupid.) MB I would like to see The Bat! as elegant and as transparent in its MB User Interface and as simple and intuitive as possible. MB Maybe

Re: [The Bat! 3.63.12 (Beta)] Message cannot be sent

2005-12-15 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: Marek Mikus · 2005-12-15 · 11:56 h (CET)] Hello, Marek! --- Edit Mail Message - Ahrendt, Dörte [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Message has not been sent. Server reply - bad address syntax: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Ahrendt ---

Unwanted Outbox Behavior [was Re: Outbox bug that over-rides macros for OpenPGP in Address Book templates]

2005-12-15 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Roelof! On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 2:02 AM, you wrote: MB Well, I have been writing about this for two days, ever since it Yes, I noticed, but I didn't have the time to reply to it before. I meant, why didn't Maxim, especially, mention it, since he made a direct response to me--if

Re: 3.63.12 bugs (mainly IMAP)

2005-12-15 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Peter! On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 1:34 AM, you wrote: 4) Address book nicknames do no work Confirmed. They did not work in .09 either. I'm going to put a BT Issue Report on that now and will be back shortly with the URL for it. -- Best regards, Please support the wish for a

Re: 3.63.12 bugs (mainly IMAP)

2005-12-15 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Thursday, December 15, 2005, Mary Bull wrote: 4) Address book nicknames do no work Confirmed. They did not work in .09 either. I'm going to put a BT Issue Report on that now and will be back shortly with the URL for it. new editor header control is available since .09, this is

Re: [The Bat! 3.63.12 (Beta)] Message cannot be sent

2005-12-15 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Thursday, December 15, 2005, Volker Ahrendt wrote: Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:42:25 +0100 From: Volker Ahrendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.63.12 (Beta)) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Ahrendt,_D=F6rte?= [EMAIL

Nicknames in Address Book BT Report

2005-12-15 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Everyone! Please support https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5454 . Before beta v. 3.63.09, typing a nickname into the To, CC, or BCC fields would cause the nickname to be replaced with that address from the Address Book. Since v. .09 and including the current beta v. .ll/.12, this

Re: Outbox bug that over-rides macros for OpenPGP in Address Book templates

2005-12-15 Thread Mary Bull
Hello George! On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 2:34 AM, you wrote: MB It is not a new feature that I'm asking for. RO Yes, it is a new feature. Just because you don't understand RO what's causing the issue, doesn't mean it's a bug. IMO, this is a bug; just not one that has anything to do with

Re: [The Bat! 3.63.12 (Beta)] Message cannot be sent

2005-12-15 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: Marek Mikus · 2005-12-15 · 13:18 h (CET)] Hello, Marek! To: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Ahrendt,_D=F6rte?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] comma is not encoded, it should be AFAIK To: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Ahrendt=2C_D=F6rte?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yep! - I took a look into old messages sent with 3.63.08 and there

Re: 3.63.12 bugs (mainly IMAP)

2005-12-15 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Marek! On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 6:04 AM, you wrote: 4) Address book nicknames do no work Confirmed. They did not work in .09 either. I'm going to put a BT Issue Report on that now and will be back shortly with the URL for it. new editor header control is available since .09,

Re: [The Bat! 3.63.12 (Beta)] Message cannot be sent

2005-12-15 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Thursday, December 15, 2005, Volker Ahrendt wrote: To: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Ahrendt=2C_D=F6rte?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yep! - I took a look into old messages sent with 3.63.08 and there the commas are encoded. So this is a bug, isn't!? ;-) it is fixed bug, Stef closed report rihgt now!

Re: 3.63.12 bugs (mainly IMAP)

2005-12-15 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Thursday, December 15, 2005, Peter Fjelsten wrote: 2) Get many duplicates. My guess is that auto purge/compress is messed up. Filtering leaves behind filtered messages. I am unable to confirm duplicates in IMAP folder, what is You folder/account setting? -- Bye Marek

Re: 3.63.12 bugs (mainly IMAP)

2005-12-15 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Marek, On 15-12-2005 13:51, you [MM] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2) Get many duplicates. My guess is that auto purge/compress is messedup. Filtering leaves behind filtered messages. MM I am unable to confirm duplicates in IMAP folder, what is You MM folder/account setting?

Autocomplete setting in Preferences is ignored in Editor

2005-12-15 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello, I have disabled autocomplete in Preferences, but it is still active. https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5459 -- Thanks and Bye, Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 3.63.12 (Beta) under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Notebook

Macro %CURSOR=BODY doesn't work, cursor jumps to body and then back to header

2005-12-15 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello, added into BT as https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5456 -- Thanks and Bye, Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 3.63.12 (Beta) under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Notebook Acer, Pentium4-M 2.2 GHz, 512 MB RAM, ADSL line

Re: Autocomplete setting in Preferences is ignored in Editor

2005-12-15 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Marek! On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 7:04 AM, you wrote: I have disabled autocomplete in Preferences, but it is still active. https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5459 Confirmed. Putting supporting note at BT. -- Best regards, Please support the wish for a 'Draft' folder at:

Re: Macro %CURSOR=BODY doesn't work, cursor jumps to body and then back to header

2005-12-15 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Marek! On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 7:05 AM, you wrote: added into BT as https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5456 Confirming note added. -- Best regards, Please support the wish for a 'Draft' folder at: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441 Mary The Bat 3.63.11 (Beta)

X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Everyone! For messages created in betas since 3.63.09, the Roguemoticon cannot be seen by the recipient. Even if you type the handle in manually in the MicroEd Edit Mail Message window, after the message is sent, there is no X-Rogue field to be seen when it is opened in the recipient's

Re: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Thursday, December 15, 2005, Mary Bull wrote: Please support https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5462 if you would like this headers-editor bug to be fixed. All support will be greatly appreciated! confirm and supported in BT. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat!

Re: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Peter Hampf
Answering a current message (Thursday, December 15, 2005, 14:30) Hello Mary, MB For messages created in betas since 3.63.09, the Roguemoticon cannot MB be seen by the recipient. This is also true for my template macros %SetHeader(X-No-Archive,yes)%- %SetHeader(X-Archive,expiry=0)%- Both are

Button Add to address book in Editor's header row doesn't work

2005-12-15 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello, when I enter address and click to middle button in right side of header row, nothing happens. https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5464 -- Thanks and Bye, Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 3.63.12 (Beta) under Windows XP 5.1 Build

Re: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Charlene Ferrara
Hi Mary Bull, Thursday, December 15, 2005 you let us know -at least in parts- : if you would like this headers-editor bug to be fixed. All support will be greatly appreciated! Added a note, since it is not working here either. Only pictures from address book are shown, however. -- kind

Re: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Peter! On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 7:38 AM, you wrote: MB For messages created in betas since 3.63.09, the Roguemoticon cannot MB be seen by the recipient. This is also true for my template macros %SetHeader(X-No-Archive,yes)%- %SetHeader(X-Archive,expiry=0)%- Both are missing

Re: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Charlene! On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 7:49 AM, you wrote: if you would like this headers-editor bug to be fixed. All support will be greatly appreciated! Added a note, since it is not working here either. Only pictures from address book are shown, however. Thanks for putting

Re: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Roland Burger
Hi Peter, on Thursday, December 15, 2005 at 14:38 you wrote in message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] among others: Answering a current message (Thursday, December 15, 2005, 14:30) Hello Mary, MB For messages created in betas since 3.63.09, the Roguemoticon cannot MB be seen by the recipient.

The Bat! 3.63.12 -highlighted items

2005-12-15 Thread Charlene Ferrara
Hello all, in main window the three buttons up right won't highlight any more when mousecursor hovers over them. They change color only for a fraction of a second and then fall back as if they weren't set active. This does also affect the [?] -other windows like the editor however work as usual.

Re: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Charlene Ferrara
Hi Roland Burger, Thursday, December 15, 2005 you let us know -at least in parts- : MB For messages created in betas since 3.63.09, the Roguemoticon cannot MB be seen by the recipient. Works for HTML-mails like the one I am replying to right now! Sorry for my first HTML-mail here, I do

Re: The Bat! 3.63.11 (Beta) is now available

2005-12-15 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 1:07:59 AM, George M. Menegakis wrote: [-] (#0005396) Move up, Move down, Move in, Move out are not working correctly when moving folders across accounts *NOT* fixed. I'm using OTFP and this functionality still is broken. I'm NOT using

Re: About TB folders

2005-12-15 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 3:13:59 AM, Vili wrote: I DO admit that parked mails and draft mails use the same flag. well, finally. I thought the only thing you were going to notice in this whole conversation was the tone you criticized in MAU's note to Stefan -- Dwight A. Corrin 928 S

Re: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Roland! On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 8:12 AM, you wrote: MB For messages created in betas since 3.63.09, the Roguemoticon MB cannot be seen by the recipient. This is also true for my template macros %SetHeader(X-No-Archive,yes)%- %SetHeader(X-Archive,expiry=0)%- Both are

Re: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 7:30:47 AM, Mary Bull wrote: Please support https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5462 if you would like this headers-editor bug to be fixed. All support will be greatly appreciated! Done. Hope someone at RITlabs will find the time to read them. -- Dwight

Re: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Charlene! On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 8:22 AM, you wrote: MB For messages created in betas since 3.63.09, the Roguemoticon MB cannot be seen by the recipient. Works for HTML-mails like the one I am replying to right now! Not seeing either the X-Rogue handle or the Roguemoticon here.

Re: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Dwight! On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 8:42 AM, you wrote: Please support https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5462 if you would like this headers-editor bug to be fixed. All support will be greatly appreciated! Done. ... Thanks a mil to you, Dwight, and to all others who have

Re: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 8:50:58 AM, Mary Bull wrote: Sorry for my first HTML-mail here, I do this for testing purpose only. I manually put in my rogue handle and want to know if it really works for HTML. Doesn't work for this recipient. (: Anywqay, HTML editor would be no

Re: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Roland Burger
Hi Mary, on Thursday, December 15, 2005 at 15:41 you wrote in message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] among others: Hello Roland! An I cannot use my QTs with version 3.63.12! May be it is due to that there is nothing working if you click on "To" in new mails! You mean in the headers? Normally

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-15 Thread Vili
Hello Dwight, I DO admit that parked mails and draft mails use the same flag. well, finally. I never said, that they are marked differently. What I am saying is: WHY IS IT IMPORTANT that only one kind of flagging is used??? What difference two kind of flag would make? You dont want to send

Re: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Roland! On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 8:58 AM, you wrote: An I cannot use my QTs with version 3.63.12! May be it is due to that there is nothing working if you click on To in new mails! You mean in the headers? Normally there has to be opened the addressbook to insert then the

Anyone could give a help with BayesFilter?

2005-12-15 Thread Eddie Castelli
Dear all, As you see I've installed the v3.63.09 including Bayes Filter. While Installing BF! I've not changed anything - so just keeping the standard installation. Then I teach BF! with around 7'000 SPAM and around 10'000 HAM. Today I downloaded my mails and - yes - Zero SPAM where put into to

Re: Outbox bug that over-rides macros for OpenPGP in Address Book templates

2005-12-15 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello George, On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:34:39 -0800 GMT (15/12/2005, 15:34 +0700 GMT), George Mitchell wrote: GM IMO, this is a bug; just not one that has anything to do with GM templates. It's not a bug, because it works exactly as designed. As Roelof pointed out. GM If you save, close and

Re: Anyone could give a help with BayesFilter?

2005-12-15 Thread James Senick
Hello Eddie, On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, at 17:28:54 [GMT +0100] (which was 11:28:54 AM in NY, USA) Eddie Castelli wrote: Anything I did wrong or must I do some further adjustments? If you haven't already, I would follow the instructions on enabling the RegEx filters and downloading the SpamPal RegEx

Re: Outbox bug that over-rides macros for OpenPGP in Address Book templates

2005-12-15 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Thomas! On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 9:52 AM, you wrote: GM If you save, close and reopen a message, the editor should be in GM *exactly* the same state as it was before closing. The complete GM message state, including any PGP settings, should be saved with GM the draft message. I

Mod: HTML use (was: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed)

2005-12-15 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Roland, On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:12:01 +0100GMT (15-12-2005, 15:12 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RB Hi Peter, moderator Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated this reply. Please

Re: Lost IMAP folders with new IMAP mail provider

2005-12-15 Thread Matt Thoene
On Wednesday, December 14, 2005 @ 11:56:40 PM [-0700], Peter Fjelsten wrote: MT How would I go about getting this mail back? I don't necessarily MT care about the folder structure at this point, I just want the MT emails that were in those folders. Back them up before opening TB. Make some

Re: Mod: HTML use

2005-12-15 Thread Roland Burger
Hi Roelof, on Thursday, December 15, 2005 at 17:17 you wrote in message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] among others: Hallo Roland, On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:12:01 +0100GMT (15-12-2005, 15:12 +0200, where I live), you wrote: Please do not send HTML messages to the list except for purposes of testing.

Re: Mod: HTML use

2005-12-15 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Roland, On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:41:33 +0100GMT (15-12-2005, 17:41 +0100, where I live), you wrote: Please do not send HTML messages to the list except for purposes of RB Sorry for that! I didn't find anything to make special settings for newsgroups! It RB cannot be that I have always to

Re: Mod: HTML use

2005-12-15 Thread Roland Burger
Hi Roelof, on Thursday, December 15, 2005 at 18:25 you wrote in message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] among others: You could use AB templates for mailinglists with these macros: %SETEDITOR=1 for Plain text Microed %SETEDITOR=2 for Plain text Windows editor %SETEDITOR=3 for HTML / Plain

Re: Tiny problem opening PDF attachments

2005-12-15 Thread MAU
Hello Vili, The 'tiny' problem shows up when I open a PDF attachment in TB, they always open with Acrobat 4.0. No real problem, I can view PDFs, but I just don't understand why this is happening. Maybe TB! call the show association of the extension? I mean like instead of calling open %1

Re: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Charlene Ferrara
Hi Mary Bull, Thursday, December 15, 2005 you let us know -at least in parts- : Not seeing either the X-Rogue handle or the Roguemoticon here. Strange that this doesn't affect all TBBETA-list members. Some rogues I can see and some not. Sorry for my first HTML-mail here, I do this for

Re: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Charlene, On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CF I often wonder why some list members constantly refrain from enabling CF the X-mailer ID in Options | Preferences | Use X-mailer header... CF It would be helpful for others and would show some kind of courtesy to CF fellow

Re: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Zygmunt Wereszczynski
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, at 15:22:25 [UTC+0100] (Thursday, December 15, 2005 15:22 my local time) Charlene Ferrara wrote: MB For messages created in betas since 3.63.09, the Roguemoticon cannot MB be seen by the recipient. Works for HTML-mails like the one I am replying to right now!

Re[2]: Tiny problem opening PDF attachments

2005-12-15 Thread Vili
Hello MAU, The 'tiny' problem shows up when I open a PDF attachment in TB, they always open with Acrobat 4.0. No real problem, I can view PDFs, but I just don't understand why this is happening. Maybe TB! call the show association of the extension? I mean like instead of calling open %1

Re: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 1:14:47 PM, Charlene Ferrara wrote: It would be helpful for others and would show some kind of courtesy to fellow users. It used to be automatic. There was some problem with blacklists of TB! which led to making it an option. My information is more available

Re: Outbox bug that over-rides macros for OpenPGP in Address Book templates

2005-12-15 Thread George Mitchell
Thomas Fernandez wrote: TF It's not a bug, because it works exactly as designed. As Roelof TF pointed out. I'm guessing it's more an oversight than a design decision. In any case, message state is being discarded on save and in my book that's a bug. GM If you save, close and reopen a message,

Re: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Charlene Ferrara
Hi Richard Wakeford, Thursday, December 15, 2005 you let us know -at least in parts- : Not being to well up on all these headers (I only use the ones people tell me about) could you elucidate further and then I might stop being one of those who doesn't have the X-mailer ID disabled as it is

Re: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Charlene Ferrara
Hi Zygmunt Wereszczynski, Thursday, December 15, 2005 you let us know -at least in parts- : Unfortunately, it doesn't work. Probably you can see yourself from Address Book, because your message does not contain X-Rogue field in the header. Yes, I saw it. That was subject of my test. I

Re: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Charlene, On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CF Your header is as courteous as you have always been ;) Just as well I don't wear a hat, I'd be buying the next size up! CF You are using CF The Bat! (v3.63.12 (Beta)) Professional it says. The header entry CF about the

About TB folders : outbox vs draft ...

2005-12-15 Thread Claude Renaud
Hi all, As a supporter of the idea of the implementation of a draft folder, I will add : For me distinguishing parked messages from drafted ones is not so easy because it is a matter of flags and as you remember perhaps I'm blind and my screen reader does not handle graphical symbols easily

Re: About TB folders : outbox vs draft ...

2005-12-15 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Claude! On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 2:39 PM, you wrote: As a supporter of the idea of the implementation of a draft folder, I will add : For me distinguishing parked messages from drafted ones is not so easy because it is a matter of flags and as you remember perhaps I'm blind

Reply to all quoting the selected text

2005-12-15 Thread Vili
Hello all, Do we have a shortcut to Reply to all quoting the selected text? I dont find it... -- Vili Current beta is 3.63.09 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a

Re: TB V3.63.12 issues

2005-12-15 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Thursday, December 15, 2005, Peter Ouwehand wrote: 1. Missing quotes around a persons name in the To: field I have my address book sorted according Last, First Middle. Suppose an entry as follows: Name as displayed: LastName, FirstName Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] When

Re: Reply to all quoting the selected text

2005-12-15 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 3:19:15 PM, Vili wrote: Do we have a shortcut to Reply to all quoting the selected text? I dont find it... shift and click the reply to all button is the only one I know of, but at least we got one. it was a long time coming. -- Dwight A. Corrin 928 S

Re: TB V3.63.12 issues

2005-12-15 Thread Zygmunt Wereszczynski
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, at 22:17:54 [UTC+0100] (Thursday, December 15, 2005 22:17 my local time) Peter Ouwehand wrote: 1. Missing quotes around a persons name in the To: field Cannot confirm. I such cases my The Bat! 3.63.12 uses correct syntax for addressing, i.e., LastName, FirstName

Re: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Charlene Ferrara
Hi Richard Wakeford, Thursday, December 15, 2005 you let us know -at least in parts- : CF Your header is as courteous as you have always been ;) Just as well I don't wear a hat, I'd be buying the next size up! If you ever feel in the right mood to change that habitude, please update your

I have another good reason to ask for a Drafts folder, in this case also FOR ME

2005-12-15 Thread MAU
Hello all, Scenario: You start a reply to any message and 'Save as draft'. What happens when you 'Save as draft': 1.- The message you are replying to is marked as Replied. Why if you have not finished your reply? 2.- If you use Replied filters (I do) they are tested and, if the conditions of

Re[2]: Reply to all quoting the selected text

2005-12-15 Thread Vili
Hello Dwight, Do we have a shortcut to Reply to all quoting the selected text? I dont find it... shift and click the reply to all button is the only one I know of, but at least we got one. it was a long time coming. Thanks, it works! :)) -- Vili

Re: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Charlene, On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Well, I've just had a look at my headers and the X-Mailer is disabled here. CF Funny though that from your mail's header I can see which version CF you are using currently -see attached png. Yes, I noticed that too and

Re: Reply to all quoting the selected text

2005-12-15 Thread MAU
Hello Vili, Do we have a shortcut to Reply to all quoting the selected text? I dont find it... shift and click the reply to all button is the only one I know of, but at least we got one. it was a long time coming. Thanks, it works! :)) Doesn't work here. It only works from RMB

Re: I have another good reason to ask for a Drafts folder, in this case also FOR ME

2005-12-15 Thread Vili
Hello MAU, 1.- The message you are replying to is marked as Replied. Why if you have not finished your reply? 2.- If you use Replied filters (I do) they are tested and, if the conditions of any of them are met, it/they will trigger and execute the actions. Why if you have not actually

Re: X-Rogue is broken; Roguemoticons not displayed

2005-12-15 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Charlene, Thursday, December 15, 2005, 9:07:18 PM, you wrote: CF It was spoken CF that the ID was cloaked by default because TB at a certain moment was CF under suspicion to be a mass mailer tool (don't remember the correct CF expression) and therefor was blocked by some ISPs. Mine is

Re[2]: About TB folders

2005-12-15 Thread Roger Phillips
Hello Mark, On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 11:05:52 AM, among other things, you wrote: MP Hello Stefan, MP Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 11:22:43 PM, you wrote: ST I don't have time to read all messages about the Draft folder. I don't ST understand why creation of a virtual folder cannot work