Hello danger,
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:16:30 -0500 GMT (26/02/2008, 09:16 +0700 GMT),
danger wrote:
d now filed as bugtrack item 0006856
Thanks. https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6856 supported.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
We have enough youth, how about a fountain of Smart?
Guten Tag danger,
am Montag, 25. Februar 2008 um 02:59 schrieben Sie:
I think that the following has to be taken into consideration.
1) The Bat can not stop working with out clear warning.
(most users will not read a log)
Maybe it could be of interest to work over the Alert-System
into 3
Hello danger,
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:59:24 -0500 GMT (25/02/2008, 08:59 +0700 GMT),
danger wrote:
d I think that the following has to be taken into consideration.
d
d 1) The Bat can not stop working with out clear warning. (most users will not
read a log)
d
d 2) If every other MTA will throw up
snip
now filed as bugtrack item 0006856
--
Best regards,
dangermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current beta is 4.0.14.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello all,
Sunday, February 24, 2008, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Thanks for your opinion. I will assume that you will never accept an
expired certificate. That's good for you. I have a different opinion.
Why do you want to forbid me to do something? Just because you
wouldn't want to do it
Hello Marek,
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:49:47 +0100 GMT (24/02/2008, 18:49 +0700 GMT),
Marek Mikus wrote:
Good morning. You were up late last night, I didn't expect a reply so
fast. Thanks.
MM once developers accept such opinion, nobody will use correct
MM certs then, everybody (including You) will
2/24/2008 3:19 PM
Hi Thomas,
On 2/24/2008 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF Why are people so vehemently against options, just because they don't
TF want to use them? Especially options that other email clients offer.
TF Are you trying to save the internet by disallowing this in TB!?
Why bother with
I am fascinated that you want to complain because TB has the courage
to do the right thing instead of being politically correct like
all (or most) of the others.
It isn't a case of courage but rather usability and allowing people
to use the program as they see fit.
--
Is the message
2/24/2008 3:59 PM
Hi Rick,
On 2/24/2008 Rick Grunwald wrote:
I am fascinated that you want to complain because TB has the courage
to do the right thing instead of being politically correct like
all (or most) of the others.
RG It isn't a case of courage but rather usability and
It is
Hello Paul,
Sunday, February 24, 2008, 10:06:36 PM, you wrote:
PVN r go to some other place that promotes
PVN inappropriate compromise
Man, Man, Man! Miserie, Miserie, Miserie!
Can someone tell me how it is determined that any given compromise is
inappropriate?
--
Is the message
2/24/2008 4:42 PM
Hi Rick,
On 2/24/2008 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG Can someone tell me how it is determined that any given compromise is
RG inappropriate?
When the purpose is compromised. This is not an either/or issue. There
is a single purpose. If you do not want the security you have the
2/24/2008 4:37 PM
Hi Mark,
On 2/24/2008 Mark Partous wrote:
PVN r go to some other place that promotes
PVN inappropriate compromise
MP Man, Man, Man! Miserie, Miserie, Miserie!
True!, True!, True!
- --
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.99.4 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
Hello Paul,
Sunday, February 24, 2008, 10:06:36 PM, you wrote:
PVN r go to some other place that promotes
PVN inappropriate compromise
Man, Man, Man! Miserie, Miserie, Miserie!
--
Mark
Current beta is 4.0.14.4 | 'Using TBBETA'
2/24/2008 5:45 PM
Hi Volker,
On 2/24/2008 Volker Ahrendt wrote:
VA *Abgelehnt*, weil … Das war schon immer so! ;-) SCNR
VA Seriously, that would be a good option.
VA Cheers!
VA VA
I agree... maybe. I have tried to count how many people I know outside
of the techie lists I belong to. I can't
Guten Tag Thomas Fernandez,
am Sonntag, 24. Februar 2008 um 13:07 schrieben Sie:
Are you trying to save the internet by disallowing this in TB!?
I thought this right the moment now.
I would support a urgly and red Error-Message with a
Confirmation Dialog to User, becaue it is security
[Reply to: »Jens Franik« · 2008-02-24 · 23:28 h (CET)]
Hello, Jens!
Are you trying to save the internet by disallowing this in TB!?
I thought this right the moment now. I would support a urgly and red
Error-Message with a Confirmation Dialog to User, becaue it is
security relevant, but i
Hello Paul,
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:44:56 -0500 GMT (25/02/2008, 04:44 +0700 GMT),
Paul Van Noord wrote:
RG Can someone tell me how it is determined that any given
RG compromise is inappropriate?
PVN When the purpose is compromised. This is not an either/or issue.
PVN There is a single purpose.
Hello Paul,
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:43:39 -0500 GMT (25/02/2008, 05:43 +0700 GMT),
Paul Van Noord wrote:
TF Right now, the only way to read my mail--in the scenario mentioned,
TF which is not unusual--is to use another one of a myriad of email
TF clients, most of them free.
PVN Webmail
2/24/2008 5:43 PM
Hi Thomas,
On 2/24/2008 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF Right now, the only way to read my mail--in the scenario mentioned,
TF which is not unusual--is to use another one of a myriad of email
TF clients, most of them free.
Webmail temporarily?
- --
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager
Guten Tag Paul Van Noord,
am Sonntag, 24. Februar 2008 um 23:43 schrieben Sie:
TF Right now, the only way to read my mail--in the scenario mentioned,
TF which is not unusual--is to use another one of a myriad of email
TF clients, most of them free.
Webmail temporarily?
There are a lot of
Guten Tag Marek Mikus,
am Sonntag, 24. Februar 2008 um 12:49 schrieben Sie:
once developers accept such opinion, nobody will use correct certs then,
everybody (including You) will confirm warning window instead changing
certificate, because it is easier.
I worked for a middle-range ISP for
On Sunday, February 24, 2008, 4:27:11 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Right now, the only way to read my mail--in the scenario mentioned,
which is not unusual--is to use another one of a myriad of email
clients, most of them free.
maybe we can call that the ultimate work around!
--
Dwight A.
Hello Volker,
Sunday, February 24, 2008, 5:38:22 PM, you wrote:
VA [Reply to: »Jens Franik« · 2008-02-24 · 23:28 h (CET)]
VA Hello, Jens!
Are you trying to save the internet by disallowing this in TB!?
I thought this right the moment now. I would support a urgly and red
Error-Message with
Hello Volker,
[snip]
3) If The Bat stops working for this type of error and another MTA
works. It will be conceived as a bug in the Bat, and so The other
MTA will be used and the Bat will be disregarded and will be considered a
poor product.
4) Their will be cases where a user or user can
Hello Marek,
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 05:52:40 +0100 GMT (24/02/2008, 11:52 +0700 GMT),
Marek Mikus wrote:
Not I must. I should. And if I don't do it, I must live with the
consequences. I must not be nannied by my email program - especially
since other email programs don't nanny the user. They
25 matches
Mail list logo
