Re: IMAP issues/status in 102

Maxim, On 19-11-2010 11:29, you wrote in : > Synchronize settings are now not taking into consideration, The Bat! just > gets the headers until you open a message. Do you have any time frame on fixing this? -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 4.2.36.4 Pro MyGate, RSS 4 IMAP (Courier) & 1

Re: IMAP issues/status in 102

Hello Peter, Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 10:40:02 PM, you wrote: > I don't believe there has been any mention about when this - basic IMAP > functionality - will be fixed. Max? Synchronize settings are now not taking into consideration, The Bat! just gets the headers until you open a message. An

Re: IMAP issues/status in 102

Stuart, On 16-11-2010 02:05, you wrote in : > Hello Peter, > A reminder of what Peter Fjelsten typed on: > Monday, November 15, 2010 at 21:12:04 GMT +0100 PF>> Sync settings do not seem to work: Although I set "full synchonization", PF>> messages aren't. > I don't know if there i

Re: IMAP issues/status in 102

Hello Peter, A reminder of what Peter Fjelsten typed on: Monday, November 15, 2010 at 21:12:04 GMT +0100 PF> Sync settings do not seem to work: Although I set "full synchonization", PF> messages aren't. I don't know if there is a bugtraq entry, but they are aware of it. PF>

Re: IMAP issues/status in 102

Hi Peter, Monday, November 15, 2010, 1:12:04 PM, you wrote: PF> Sync settings do not seem to work: Although I set "full synchonization", PF> messages aren't. For my settings for my Gmail IMAP account, I just have used the subscription window to select the folders I wish

Re: IMAP issues/status in 102

On 15-11-2010 21:12, I wrote in : > IMAP auto filtering apparently still does not work - at least looking at > the (lack of) progress on this: > https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=8123. Nope it doesn't. Not even manual re-filtering (when doing so without downloading message).

IMAP issues/status in 102

Hello Bat Beta, I have the following issues which makes TB problematic for me at the moment (if anyone has reported these, please send a link to BT): Sync settings do not seem to work: Although I set "full synchonization", messages aren't. Connection Centre does not give any

OT: [OT] Bob's rogue (was: Re: TB and various IMAP Issues)

Hallo Volker, On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:49:51 +0100GMT (10-2-2009, 13:49, where I live), you wrote: After all, if we look far enough into our family trees we all come from the same apes, don't we? >>> No, not me! ;-) >> That's right. I forgot that a few of you come directly from frogs ;) V

Re: [OT] Bob's rogue (was: Re: TB and various IMAP Issues)

[Reply to: »MAU« · 2009-02-10 · 13:03 h (CET)] Moin, MAU! >>> After all, if we look far enough into our family trees we all come >>> from the same apes, don't we? >> >> No, not me! ;-) > That's right. I forgot that a few of you come directly from frogs ;) Hear! This is my granny talking:

Re: [OT] Bob's rogue (was: Re: TB and various IMAP Issues)

Hello Volker, >> After all, if we look far enough into our family trees we all come >> from the same apes, don't we? > > No, not me! ;-) That's right. I forgot that a few of you come directly from frogs ;) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.1.11.2 on Windo

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

Montag, 9. Februar 2009 at 20:49, Volker Ahrendt wrote: >> I tried to create an account twice - no luck. The "submit" command >> to create a new account just left me hanging indefinitely each time. > Same here for two years or so, too! :-/ I always thought i was dumb so i couln't handle it, but

Re: [OT] Bob's rogue (was: Re: TB and various IMAP Issues)

[Reply to: »MAU« · 2009-02-09 · 20:35 h (CET)] Moin, MAU! >> MAU definitely looks much older than I do. > The photo in the gallery is old, not me. The older a photo is, the younger is the person on the photo [1]! ;-) >> On top of that, his German-Spanish heritage shows... > Swiss-Spanish. But

Re: [OT] Bob's rogue (was: Re: TB and various IMAP Issues)

[Reply to: »MAU« · 2009-02-09 · 20:49 h (CET)] Moin, MAU! >> You are kidding! > Who, me? How could I be kidding if, according to Bob, I'm half > German ;-) LOL – YMMD! I love abbreviations or acronyms! ;-) Cheers! VA - -- Direct eMail without [tbb] in subject line will end in Nirvana! Q&A

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

[Reply to: »Bob Riley« · 2009-02-09 · 19:41 h (CET)] Moin, Bob! > I tried to create an account twice - no luck. The "submit" command > to create a new account just left me hanging indefinitely each time. Same here for two years or so, too! :-/ Cheers! VA - -- Direct eMail without [tbb] in subj

Re: [OT] Bob's rogue (was: Re: TB and various IMAP Issues)

Hello Jens, > You are kidding! Who, me? How could I be kidding if, according to Bob, I'm half German ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.1.11.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3 Current beta is

Re: [OT] Bob's rogue (was: Re: TB and various IMAP Issues)

Montag, 9. Februar 2009 at 20:35, MAU wrote: > Well, somehow you got your picture in. I downloaded the latest > rogues.zip and I can see you in the headers now. See attached PNG. You are kidding! You did add him to your adressbook, thats why he shows up to _YOU_ He not even has a X-Rogue Header

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

Montag, 9. Februar 2009 at 19:41, Bob Riley wrote: > I tried to create an account twice - no luck. The "submit" command to > create a new account just left me hanging indefinitely each time. Exactly, and after that nobody else can login until Admins do reset. You dont need an account, see the

[OT] Bob's rogue (was: Re: TB and various IMAP Issues)

Hello Bob, > I tried to create an account twice - no luck. The "submit" command to > create a new account just left me hanging indefinitely each time. Well, somehow you got your picture in. I downloaded the latest rogues.zip and I can see you in the headers now. See attached PNG. > MAU defini

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

Hi Everyone, On 2/9/2009 11:14 AM, Jens Franik wrote: http://pcwize.com/thebat/ You can include most of the Peoples Pictures into your Bat with ease, only some photos (for example mine) are not public there (in my case it does still not work to upload it there, even praying did not help). I t

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

Montag, 9. Februar 2009 at 17:58, Bob Riley wrote: > I sent my photo to MAU by private post However, he has not returned > the favor, so I must reluctantly conclude that he has more wrinkles http://pcwize.com/thebat/ You can include most of the Peoples Pictures into your Bat with ease, only som

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

Hi Roger, On 2/8/2009 9:55 PM, you wrote: Where do you see Bob's photo? He does not appear in my setup, and I have just downloaded the latest 'Rogues' file. I could post my photo somewhere in the mailing list members home, if I knew there was such a place. I would risk the laughter (or e

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

Montag, 9. Februar 2009 at 13:18, Thomas Fernandez wrote: > [MAU, replying to Bob Riley:] RP>> Where do you see Bob's photo? He does not appear in my setup, and I have RP>> just downloaded the latest 'Rogues' file. > Same here. Same here, althoug i have some extra Fotos of Ritlabs (because

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

Hello Roger, >>> ... at my advanced age (even a little older than MAU!). > M>> Yes, you are just a little older than me but, admit it, you look /much/ M>> older than me ;-) > > Where do you see Bob's photo? He does not appear in my setup, and I have > just downloaded the latest 'Rogues' file.

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

Hello Roger, On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 06:55:37 +0200 GMT (09/02/2009, 11:55 +0700 GMT), Roger Phillips wrote: [MAU, replying to Bob Riley:] M>> Yes, you are just a little older than me but, admit it, you look /much/ M>> older than me ;-) RP> Where do you see Bob's photo? He does not appear in my se

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

Dear Bob, --->>> Bob Riley / Sonntag 08.02.2009, 20:13:04 TB and various IMAP Issues > I enjoy this group immensely. Thank you all. And I loved to read your post :) > Bob Riley in Albuquerque, New Mexico, Les Etats-Unis the Planet Earth, the Universe

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

Hello Miguel, Sunday, February 8, 2009, 8:24:53 PM, among other things, you wrote: M> Hello Bob, >> ... at my advanced age (even a little older than MAU!). M> Yes, you are just a little older than me but, admit it, you look /much/ M> older than me ;-) Where do you see Bob's photo? He does

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

Vilius, On 08-02-2009 16:43, you wrote in : > Actually it was version 2.0 when IMAP was promised. As far as I remember it > was a year 2002. I am also quite sure it was for version 2. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 4.0.39.33 (BETA) Pro MyGate, AVG 12 IMAP (Courier) & 1 IMAP (Exchang

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

Hi Michael, I am taking this off-group just to avoid becoming a distraction. On 2/8/2009 11:43 AM, you wrote: Hi Bob, it is a completely different story if we at least partially accept that TB's IMAP implementation is not perfect. And I can say that I'm using TB! for years anyway. I underst

Re[2]: TB and various IMAP Issues

Bob, >> I'm using Fastmail as well but I can confirm all the problems >> described by Bob. I think Ritlabs should now stick to their statements >> in which they've announced multiple times to fix the IMAP engine. >> > Believe me, I am appreciative of all the comments that my saying I was > disco

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

lieve me, I am appreciative of all the comments that my saying I was > discontinuing TB use for my primary mail account (Gmail's IMAP) triggered. > What I have learned from all of those well-intentioned and, I might add, > well-informed, comments are: > 1. There are some very tech-s

Re[4]: TB and various IMAP Issues

Alto, > Hi, >>> All of those years of enduring and reporting IMAP >>> issues, and all that has changed is that the issues have grown >>> _worse_ over the versions? GP>> Which suggests not negligence but inability to reproduce what you see, GP>> e

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

Hello Bob, > ... at my advanced age (even a little older than MAU!). Yes, you are just a little older than me but, admit it, you look /much/ older than me ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.1.11.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3 Winamp Playing: Tim

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

of all the comments that my saying I was discontinuing TB use for my primary mail account (Gmail's IMAP) triggered. What I have learned from all of those well-intentioned and, I might add, well-informed, comments are: 1. There are some very tech-savvy people on the TB Beta list. 2. TB'

RE: Re[2]: TB and various IMAP Issues

> Actually what I admire is the perseverance of the users that are > putting up with this tragedy for the past four years. Yes, I just took > a look at v3.0.1.33's executable date: It shows the 12.10.2004. v3 was > the first version for which IMAP had been promised, and I myself joined > the crowd

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

I'm using Fastmail as well but I can confirm all the problems described by Bob. I think Ritlabs should now stick to their statements in which they've announced multiple times to fix the IMAP engine. am Sonntag, 8. Februar 2009 um 09:11 schrieben Sie: > On Saturday, February 7, 2009, 9:26:47 PM

Re[2]: TB and various IMAP Issues

Guten Morgen, BR> Now that my message base is in the new (version 4.0 on) format, I don't BR> think I can "go back" to an older version of TB. You could always try to copy the local mails to an IMAP folder in the current version, then retrieve them again (thereby creating a brand new messagebase

Re[2]: TB and various IMAP Issues

Guten Morgen, BR> Are you saying that you, too, use IMAP with your ISP and/or Mail BR> Provider, and you don't see the "unable to send mail body due to BR> processing error" message and/or the queuing problem? BR> If that is true, this suggests that the problem may lay with Gmail's BR> implemen

Re[3]: TB and various IMAP Issues

Hi, >> All of those years of enduring and reporting IMAP >> issues, and all that has changed is that the issues have grown >> _worse_ over the versions? GP> Which suggests not negligence but inability to reproduce what you see, GP> either by Rit or by many users, wh

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

Guten Tag Robert Tomanek, am Sonntag, 8. Februar 2009 um 09:10 schrieben Sie: > Do us all a favor and stop feeding the trolls. hear hear > No matter whether Gmail's IMAP implementation is standard or not, The > Bat! *is* broken in this regard. This has been confirmed several > times by man

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

Guten Tag Frank Weidmann, am Sonntag, 8. Februar 2009 um 01:03 schrieben Sie: > Hello TB-Beta List, >> So I will go back to using TB as my primary mail client once the persistent >> IMAP nuisances are cleared up, whenever that might be. > signed this signed as well -- Mit freundlichen Grü

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

Gleason, On 07-02-2009 23:35, you wrote in : > Which suggests not negligence but inability to reproduce what you see, > either by Rit or by many users, which would include myself. Well, I have a lot of problems myself using Courier IMAP and Exchange IMAP. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

On Saturday, February 7, 2009, 9:26:47 PM, Bob Riley wrote: > Are you saying that you, too, use IMAP with your ISP and/or Mail > Provider, and you don't see the "unable to send mail body due to > processing error" message and/or the queuing problem? I have never seen this error. I have been usi

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

Hello Bob, Sunday, February 8, 2009, 4:26:47 AM, you wrote: >> Which suggests not negligence but inability to reproduce what you see, >> either by Rit or by many users, which would include myself > If that is true, this suggests that the problem may lay with Gmail's > implementation of IMAP (or,

Re[2]: TB and various IMAP Issues

2 >>> I believe), this one is a little (and I do mean "a little") better >>> when it comes to IMAP, at least the connection-lost problems don't >>> happen as often as they do with the v4.0.38. I personally even >>> continue using v3.0.1.33 to this

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

better when it comes to IMAP, at least the connection-lost problems don't happen as often as they do with the v4.0.38. I personally even continue using v3.0.1.33 to this day. Funny, isn't it? All of those years of enduring and reporting IMAP issues, and all that has changed is that the

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

Hello TB-Beta List, > So I will go back to using TB as my primary mail client once the persistent > IMAP nuisances are cleared up, whenever that might be. signed this -- Regards Frank Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA'

Re[2]: TB and various IMAP Issues

, at least the connection-lost problems don't > happen as often as they do with the v4.0.38. I personally even > continue using v3.0.1.33 to this day. > Funny, isn't it? All of those years of enduring and reporting IMAP > issues, and all that has changed is that the issues have gr

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

Funny, isn't it? All of those years of enduring and reporting IMAP issues, and all that has changed is that the issues have grown _worse_ over the versions? I don't understand it, not being a computer tech person (although I was a mechanical engineer until age 40, in 1982). However,

Re: TB and various IMAP Issues

don't happen as often as they do with the v4.0.38. I personally even continue using v3.0.1.33 to this day. Funny, isn't it? All of those years of enduring and reporting IMAP issues, and all that has changed is that the issues have grown _worse_ over the versions? -- MfG, Alto

TB and various IMAP Issues

Hi Everyone, I continue to appreciate TB's interface and many features, some of which I don't even use! However, the following issues involving TB and Gmail's IMAP features are such regular nuisances that I have finally and reluctantly decided to use Thunderbird (probably) and/or Opera (less

Re: IMAP: issues with messages with attachments

Peter, On 23-04-2008 14:38, you wrote in : > Hello beta testers. Isn't it nice that TB IMAP suddenly decides to send a message that was sitting in the outbox as a draft? ;-) -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 4.0.20.4 Pro MyGate, AVG 2 POP3, 14 IMAP (Courier) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 20

IMAP: issues with messages with attachments

Hello beta testers. In the last couple of releases/betas, if I go back to a message already received once -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 4.0.20.4 Pro MyGate, AVG 2 POP3, 14 IMAP (Courier) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 200K+ msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 _

Re[2]: IMAP issues

Hello Peter, Thursday, February 15, 2007, 22:03:13, you wrote: >>I have updated with current status + updated some other IMAP issues. Thank you! -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAIL PRO

Re: IMAP issues

Maxim, On 15-02-2007 19:34, you [] wrote in : > Could you please confirm (or add a note that this bug no longer > happen) to the following entries (they have not been updated since > 2005): I have updated with current status + updated some other IMAP issues. -- Best regards

IMAP issues

Hello Tbbeta, Could you please confirm (or add a note that this bug no longer happen) to the following entries (they have not been updated since 2005): https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3103 https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=1575 https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2260 https://ww

Re: My IMAP issues with 3.0.9.7

Hello 9Val, > OK, it is not the first time GMX Imap server and TB! gives > slow logging. Unfortunately... > RT> TB! shows wrong message lists. I have rescan active, but can't see why > RT> that matters here: I close TB on this day and open it at another. Then > RT> I see the correct number of

Re: My IMAP issues with 3.0.9.7

Hello Raymund, RT> It is a TB problem. To change the number of connections don't change RT> anything. I use the GMX IMAP server with 14 folders. 9 of which are RT> set to headers only and 5 to collect all messages. OK, it is not the first time GMX Imap server and TB! gives slow logging. RT>

Re: My IMAP issues with 3.0.9.7

Hello 9Val, > Do other clients have the same delay? Do you have a lot of > folders? Which server do you use? It is a TB problem. To change the number of connections don't change anything. I use the GMX IMAP server with 14 folders. 9 of which are set to headers only and 5 to collect all messages

Re: My IMAP issues with 3.0.9.7

Hello Raymund, RT> 1. Directly after starting TB it takes a long time till the download RT>of any information from the server begins. The log at the bottom of RT>the window already says Logged on to the IMAP server, but any item RT>in the CC says in queque. It took longer to get the

Re: My IMAP issues with 3.0.9.7

Hi again! > Enough 9Val? ;-) I answer that question on my own: No. 7. Sending this email leads to a couple of message boxes saying that the current mailbox couldn't be closed. Well, the log said the server closed the connection, maybe that's the problem... -- Regards, Raymund _

My IMAP issues with 3.0.9.7

Hi all, here is my list of IMAP issues. 1. Directly after starting TB it takes a long time till the download of any information from the server begins. The log at the bottom of the window already says Logged on to the IMAP server, but any item in the CC says in queque. It took longer to

Re: IMAP Issues

Chris, On 29-11-2004 22:27, you [CW] wrote in : CW> 3. Incorrect marked messages. I get this, too. A messages was not marked with attachment (I have set TB! to fetch message structures with headers, set the folder to full sync - _and_ I had fetched the message) although it

Re: IMAP Issues

On Monday, November 29, 2004 at 4:44:51 PM [GMT -0500], Allie_M wrote: >> Sometimes when entering a folder, I can see each message twice. I >> have to leave the folder and re-enter to see the correct message >> list/count. > For me this is an old one that was fixed some time back. I haven't > see

Re[2]: IMAP Issues

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ahoi Allie, Monday, November 29, 2004 @ 10:44:51 PM: >> 1. Duplicate emails in list views. >> Sometimes when entering a folder, I can see each message twice. I >> have to leave the folder and re-enter to see the correct message >> list/count. AM> F

Re: IMAP Issues

On Monday, November 29, 2004 at 4:27:42 PM [GMT -0500], Chris Weaven wrote: > 1. Duplicate emails in list views. > Sometimes when entering a folder, I can see each message twice. I > have to leave the folder and re-enter to see the correct message > list/count. For me this is an old one that was

IMAP Issues

Hi, This beta is proving the best for me in terms of connection speed, but is failing in other areas unfortunately. The problems I'm currently experiencing are (in no particular order); 1. Duplicate emails in list views. Sometimes when entering a folder, I can see each message twice. I have to

Re: More IMAP Issues

On Saturday, August 2, 2003, at 14:06:39 [UTC-0500] (Saturday, August 2, 2003 21:06 my local time) Greg Strong wrote: > It looks like you at least have IMAP accouns working. I have 2 FastMail > & MyRealBox. TB just open connection center & stays there while > displaying "On-line" for status. I en

Re: More IMAP Issues

Hello Jonathan, > Just one or two for you to keep you busy. It looks like you at least have IMAP accouns working. I have 2 FastMail & MyRealBox. TB just open connection center & stays there while displaying "On-line" for status. I end up deleting the task, since nothing happens. Other thing t

Re: More IMAP Issues

On Saturday, August 02, 2003, Jonathan Angliss wrote... JA> Just one or two for you to keep you busy. And another one for you... The ticker bar no longer updates on receiving a new message (for IMAP accounts), it has it's notification on "0 new messages" even when there is a new message. As soo

More IMAP Issues

Hi, I know... it's beta, and you love to hear about bugs... here is a few for you. 1. Unrecoverable error on deletion of folder. On deleting a mailbox, it causes a memory violation. When swapping to take a screenshot, and flipping back, the error duplicated... several times