Hello Arjan,
Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 9:33:46 PM, you wrote:
I think I spotted a bug in TB! 4.2.4. When I tried to get Help on
changing View Modes (Options - Preferences - Message List - View
Modes Select View Mode - Edit) and clicked the Help button, I got
this: Missing context help topic
I think I spotted a bug in TB! 4.2.4. When I tried to get Help on
changing View Modes (Options - Preferences - Message List - View
Modes Select View Mode - Edit) and clicked the Help button, I got
this: Missing context help topic 11026.
Confirmed. I got the same error when I followed the
Hello Marek,
Monday, June 8, 2009, 11:55:39 PM, you wrote:
seems You care about IMAP only, but for example our customers requested
...
version without problem with DEP detection under Windows 2008 Server,
ROTFL. Can you honestly say how many of your (pl.) customers have
requested this
Hello Marek,
Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 12:44:30 AM, you wrote:
I hope, this is enough now to stop imap-related discussion until anything
related to IMAP will be announced.
No Marek, it is not. I know it is very convenient for you in your
hopeless defense of the
Hello Arjan,
Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 12:19:48 AM, you wrote:
Certainly those hopefuls are having too much fun to
allow themselves to be run off.
In a way it is funny indeed, because everything is so
predictable.
Release 4.1 was an unpleasant surprise for many users,
because they were,
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:53:20 -0400, Vili wrote:
I dont know if you have to say anything. They know I think that the
help is old.
Rewriting the help file is a time consuming and boring job. I think
at Ritlabs there is a tendency to try to avoid and/or postpone
boring and/or difficult jobs. That's
Donnerstag, 11. Juni 2009 at 18:40, Robert Tomanek wrote:
version without problem with DEP detection under Windows 2008 Server,
Can you honestly say how many of your (pl.) customers have
requested this particular feature
I have been silent, willing not to push this up...
But i would have
Hello Robert,
Thursday, June 11, 2009, 12:43:35 PM, you wrote:
No Marek, it is not. I know it is very convenient for you in your
hopeless defense of the we-are-not-going-to-make-any-commitments
strategy but it is not enough for us.
So, either they deliver IMAP support or the discussions
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 19:52:55 -0400, Ethan J Mings wrote:
And so the negative, unhelpful comments continue.
The positive, helpful approach has been tried numerous
times. See for example MaXxX's contributions in the
archives. All positive, helpful attempts proved to be
in vain.
If you want to
And so the negative, unhelpful comments continue.
The positive, helpful approach has been tried numerous
times. See for example MaXxX's contributions in the
archives. All positive, helpful attempts proved to be
in vain.
If you want to keep up hope, that's fine. But please don't
hold
On woensdag 10 juni 2009, 3:09:05 PM Gleason wrote,
The good news is that TB makes it easy to consign voices like this
to the bit bucket.
Of course you may dislike my contributions and you're not obliged to
read them, but I think showing off your self-righteousness like this
is a little bit
Hello Arjan,
Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 1:15:19 PM, you wrote:
The good news is that TB makes it easy to consign voices like this
to the bit bucket.
Of course you may dislike my contributions and you're not obliged to
read them, but I think showing off your self-righteousness like this
is a
Hello Arjan,
Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 1:15:19 PM, you wrote:
The good news is that TB makes it easy to consign voices like this
to the bit bucket.
Of course you may dislike my contributions and you're not obliged to
read them, but I think showing off your self-righteousness like this
is
Mittwoch, 10. Juni 2009 at 19:34, Ethan J Mings wrote:
Calling the moderator.
Can you please put an end to this thread!
+1
--
With kind Regards
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.de
Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg
The Bat! 4.2.1.1 + AntiSpamSniper 3.2.0.6 + Gaijin XMP Makro
On woensdag 10 juni 2009, 7:34:04 PM Ethan J Mings wrote,
Calling the moderator.
Can you please put an end to this thread!
I wholeheartedly agree with Ethan, Rick and Jens. This list is not
meant for killing dead horses, but for fruitful discussions about
Beta! development. That's why I just
On woensdag 10 juni 2009, 7:34:04 PM Ethan J Mings wrote,
Calling the moderator.
Can you please put an end to this thread!
I wholeheartedly agree with Ethan, Rick and Jens. This list is not
meant for killing dead horses, but for fruitful discussions about
Beta! development. That's why I
On donderdag 11 juni 2009, 12:50:23 AM Rick wrote,
//=== - - - - - - - - - - - - - +___ [plop]
Plus 1 anyone?
You should try to keep your balloon away from burning cigarettes, Rick.
Anyway, I think I already spotted a bug in TB! 2.4.2. When I tried to
get Help on changing
On donderdag 11 juni 2009, 12:50:23 AM Rick wrote,
//=== - - - - - - - - - - - - - +___ [plop]
Plus 1 anyone?
You should try to keep your balloon away from burning cigarettes, Rick.
Anyway, I think I already spotted a bug in TB! 2.4.2. When I tried to
get Help on
On donderdag 11 juni 2009, 12:50:23 AM Rick wrote,
Plus 1 anyone?
I think I spotted a bug in TB! 4.2.4. When I tried to get Help on
changing View Modes (Options - Preferences - Message List - View
Modes Select View Mode - Edit) and clicked the Help button, I got
this: Missing context help
Hello TheBat Beta List Members!!!
Someday, and that was in Tuesday night, Marek wrote something like this:
Pardon me, but the customer – in this case it is *us* – does not care
about *internal* plans behind closed doors. The customer wants to rely
on official statements from RITLabs and not
On Monday, June 8, 2009, 5:44:30 PM, Marek Mikus wrote:
I hope, this is enough now to stop imap-related discussion until anything
related to IMAP will be announced.
I would say just the opposite, that an IMAP announcement might stop
the imap related discussion by either raising hopes
Dwight,
On Monday, June 8, 2009, 5:44:30 PM, Marek Mikus wrote:
I hope, this is enough now to stop imap-related discussion until anything
related to IMAP will be announced.
I would say just the opposite, that an IMAP announcement might stop
the imap related discussion by either
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 11:34:26 -0400, Gleason Pace wrote:
Certainly those hopefuls are having too much fun to
allow themselves to be run off.
In a way it is funny indeed, because everything is so
predictable.
Release 4.1 was an unpleasant surprise for many users,
because they were, suddenly
Arjan,
Believe me. I've been on TBUDL and TBBETA since version 1.4x and it
has always been like this (and I guarantee you it will always be
like this). Nothing surprises me anymore.Each new Ritlabs blunder
just fills me with mild amusement. Otherwise I couldn't care less.
One thing that
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 19:16:34 -0400, Gleason Pace wrote:
One thing that could be done is that the rest of us
Us is a rapidly shrinking minority on these lists.
could agree that there is no sense communicating with
people who have nothing but vituperation to contribute.
Suit yourself. Messages
Hello Arjan,
Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 6:19:48 PM, you wrote:
Believe me. I've been on TBUDL and TBBETA since version 1.4x and it
has always been like this (and I guarantee you it will always be
like this). Nothing surprises me anymore.Each new Ritlabs blunder
just fills me with mild amusement.
Hello Arjan,
Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 6:19:48 PM, you wrote:
Believe me. I've been on TBUDL and TBBETA since version 1.4x and it
has always been like this (and I guarantee you it will always be
like this). Nothing surprises me anymore.Each new Ritlabs blunder
just fills me with mild
On Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 7:13:48 PM, Rick wrote:
Maybe its time to call this thread to an end.
Ya THNK? Why don't we all go over to the table, have cake and ice
cream and enjoy the rest of the evening :)
I think the cake and ice cream is a good idea. I'm going to watch the
Stanley Cup
On Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 7:13:48 PM, Rick wrote:
Maybe its time to call this thread to an end.
Ya THNK? Why don't we all go over to the table, have cake and ice
cream and enjoy the rest of the evening :)
I think the cake and ice cream is a good idea. I'm going to watch the
Stanley Cup
[Reply to: »Marek Mikus« · 2009-06-08 · 01:21 h (CET)]
Moin!
And: I think someone with knowledge about that posted that 4.2
will be the version with IMAP working. Obviously that was
marketing.
nobody told this,
Sorry, but IMHO these statements do not allow any diversity in
interpretation:
Hello Vilius,
Monday, June 8, 2009, 1:33:24 AM, you wrote:
Yes, it was reported 4 year ago:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4880
Excellent.
RIT can use the information as they move forward.
Jerry
--
Ethan J Mings
Oakville, Ontario Canada
qualityoff...@consultant.com
Volker,
.·¨[Stefan Tanurkov @ TBB, 2008-10-30]¨·.
·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—
VŠ Can someone from Rit update us on where IMAP rewrite is?
We've made changes to the message base format in order to improve
IMAP in the next release, so it was the
Christian,
Maxim Masiutin schrieb:
Hello Tbbeta,
We didn't change the EXE file, just repacked the MSI with the new THEBAT.LNG:
www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_pro_4-2.msi
www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_home_4-2.msi
Gleason Pace schrieb:
Congrats on not listening to your BETA List and bringing out another
bugged version.
And once again a totally useless version for those using IMAP.
Why make inflammatory statements that you must know are not correct?
Interesting statement seeing all the
Ethan J Mings schrieb:
grow weary of the blind shots that are not well documented simply
listed here in the forum. Your message, ... totally useless version
for using IMAP is in accurate because it does work. Put the concern
in the bug track or give a link to the specific existing bug track
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:14:40 -0400, Gleason Pace wrote:
4.2 is minor upgrade with more bugfixes than additions, yes,
postponed sending is available, but there are importans bugfixes and
this is reason this version was released as final.
IMHO Ritlabs should have done this important bugfixing
Christian,
Gleason Pace schrieb:
Congrats on not listening to your BETA List and bringing out another
bugged version.
And once again a totally useless version for those using IMAP.
Why make inflammatory statements that you must know are not correct?
Interesting statement
Montag, 8. Juni 2009 at 11:32, Volker Ahrendt wrote:
Why is it often so hard for people to admit, that something
(repeatedly) went wrong?
I like the calm and dry way, how you put together the important
things, Volker, really!
It would be a very straight Community here, if we could reduce the
Christian,
Finally - useless - it is. What sense is there in using a client - or
even wanting a customer to buy it - and having to tell them - but don´t
use IMAP! Even though the package says it supports IMAP - just don´t use
it.
If you want to use it - well then make ready for errors, no
Gleason Pace schrieb:
Christian,
Gleason Pace schrieb:
Congrats on not listening to your BETA List and bringing out another
bugged version.
And once again a totally useless version for those using IMAP.
Why make inflammatory statements that you must know are not
On Monday, June 8, 2009, 3:54:13 PM, Gleason Pace wrote:
Yes, and it is not true that Imap is totally useless for those who use
Imap. This isn't the first time you have heard that. But as soon as
the successful Imapers get quiet you are right back on the same track
again. Which makes me
[Reply to: »Gleason Pace« · 2009-06-08 · 16:14 h (CET)]
Moin, Gleason!
.·¨[Maxim Masiutin @ TBB, 2008-12-19]¨·.
·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—
[…] Please note that this fix is not related specifically to IMAP,
it is only a workaround of inefficient IMAP
Hello all,
Monday, June 8, 2009, Volker Ahrendt wrote:
False. The statements were done during beta cycle which lead to the
release of The Bat! 4.1.11 [1] on Jan 22, 2009. So the rework after
the release (see above) should have started in January 2009 and
implemented in the next release (aka
[Reply to: »Marek Mikus« · 2009-06-08 · 23:23 h (CET)]
Moin!
False. The statements were done during beta cycle which lead to the
release of The Bat! 4.1.11 [1] on Jan 22, 2009. So the rework
after the release (see above) should have started in January 2009
and implemented in the next release
Volker,
Pardon me, but the customer – in this case it is *us* – does not care
about *internal* plans behind closed doors. The customer wants to rely
on official statements from RITLabs and not on rumors.
That’s just to raise the topic Clear Communication. Is it so hard to
understand?
Ill
Hello all,
Monday, June 8, 2009, Volker Ahrendt wrote:
this build called 4.2 was not planned in january and was released
now as requested bugfix version with some additions and Postponed
sending. This is the reason.
Pardon me, but the customer – in this case it is *us* – does not care
about
Hi Volker,
Monday, June 8, 2009, 3:37:55 PM, you wrote:
[Reply to: »Marek Mikus« · 2009-06-08 · 23:23 h (CET)]
Moin!
[snip]
this build called 4.2 was not planned in january and was released
now as requested bugfix version with some additions and Postponed
sending. This is the reason.
Montag, 8. Juni 2009 at 23:23, Marek Mikus wrote:
was released now as
requested bugfix version
Who requested?
--
With kind Regards
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.de
Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg
The Bat! 4.2.1.1 + AntiSpamSniper 3.2.0.6 + Gaijin XMP Makro Plugin
Montag, 8. Juni 2009 at 23:55, Marek Mikus wrote:
but for example our customers requested
version without problem with
Well all this Problems are not in the last release?
Then you should not have released the buggy version.
or
Are this problems which are collected over years?
Then you
[Reply to: »Marek Mikus« · 2009-06-08 · 23:55 h (CET)]
this build called 4.2 was not planned in january and was released
now as requested bugfix version with some additions and Postponed
sending. This is the reason.
Pardon me, but the customer – in this case it is *us* – does not
care about
Hello all,
Tuesday, June 9, 2009, Jens Franik wrote:
was released now as
requested bugfix version
Who requested?
customers.
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using the best The Bat! 4.2.4
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3
with
Dienstag, 9. Juni 2009 at 00:00, Bob Riley wrote:
this build called 4.2 was not planned in january and was released
now as requested bugfix version with some additions and Postponed
sending. This is the reason.
That sounds entirely plausible and indeed likely!
Who caused it to happen?
Who
Hi Marek!
I do not want to be a nitpicker, but we should stick to the truth,
shouldn’t we? ;-)
this build called 4.2 was not planned in january and was released now as
requested bugfix version with some additions and Postponed sending. This
is the reason.
As I'm working at a software
Dienstag, 9. Juni 2009 at 00:23, Volker Ahrendt wrote:
pardon accepted, but we in TBBETA are not only customers.
Oh, come on, Marek! If we are primarily *not* customers, what do you
think we are?
Volker, i tell you: I am (not yet) but have been a Reseller for The
Bat, not official, but i
On maandag 8 juni 2009, 11:55:39 PM Marek Mikus wrote,
[... ] our customers requested version without problem with DEP
detection under Windows 2008 Server, version with fixed incorrect
handling of MIME boundary, versions with fixed templates in
filtering system, version with fixed quick
Dienstag, 9. Juni 2009 at 00:30, Raymund Tump wrote:
If you're the official voice of Ritlabs that's fine, but I doubt it.
He already told us, that he is _not_ the official voice.
But sometimes hears something more than we - maybe by phone or private
mail.
--
With kind Regards
Jens Franik
Hello all,
Tuesday, June 9, 2009, Raymund Tump wrote:
As I'm working at a software company myself I know that from time to
time you have to change plans. That is not was worries me, it is the
lack of communication from Ritlabs itself.
Just a simple 'Hey guys, we're still working on it, but
Hello all,
Tuesday, June 9, 2009, Volker Ahrendt wrote:
Pardon me, but the customer – in this case it is *us* – does not
care about *internal* plans behind closed doors. The customer wants
to rely on official statements from RITLabs and not on rumors.
pardon accepted, but we in TBBETA are
[Reply to: »Bob Riley« · 2009-06-09 · 00:00 h (CET)]
Moin, Bob!
Pardon me, but the customer – in this case it is *us* – does not
care about *internal* plans behind closed doors. The customer wants
to rely on official statements from RITLabs and not on rumors.
But official statements can
[Reply to: »Raymund Tump« · 2009-06-09 · 00:30 h (CET)]
Moin, Raymund!
I do not want to be a nitpicker, but we should stick to the truth,
shouldn’t we? ;-)
this build called 4.2 was not planned in january and was released
now as requested bugfix version with some additions and Postponed
Hello all,
Tuesday, June 9, 2009, Bob Riley wrote:
That sounds entirely plausible and indeed likely!
and it is true, of course.
This is Stef's week old comment and even I have not authorization to
publish his private message, I hope he will not punish me.
ST The new message list is still in
[Reply to: »Jens Franik« · 2009-06-09 · 00:31 h (CET)]
Moin, Jens!
pardon accepted, but we in TBBETA are not only customers.
Oh, come on, Marek! If we are primarily *not* customers, what do you
think we are?
Volker, i tell you: I am (not yet) but have been a Reseller for The
Bat, not
[Reply to: »Marek Mikus« · 2009-06-09 · 00:38 h (CET)]
Moin, Marek!
Pardon me, but the customer – in this case it is *us* – does not
care about *internal* plans behind closed doors. The customer
wants to rely on official statements from RITLabs and not on
rumors.
pardon accepted, but we in
Hi Volker,
Monday, June 8, 2009, 4:38:59 PM, you wrote:
[Reply to: »Bob Riley« · 2009-06-09 · 00:00 h (CET)]
Moin, Bob!
I like that greeting!
As Raymund just wrote:
.·¨[Raymund]¨·.
·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—
Just a simple 'Hey guys, we're still
[Reply to: »Marek Mikus« · 2009-06-09 · 00:44 h (CET)]
This is Stef's week old comment and even I have not authorization to
publish his private message, I hope he will not punish me.
ST The new message list is still in under development, because the
ST current release wasn't really planned -
Hi Marek,
Monday, June 8, 2009, 4:44:30 PM, you wrote:
That sounds entirely plausible and indeed likely!
and it is true, of course.
This is Stef's week old comment and even I have not authorization to
publish his private message, I hope he will not punish me.
ST The new message list is
Hi Volker,
Monday, June 8, 2009, 4:54:14 PM, you wrote:
[Reply to: »Marek Mikus« · 2009-06-09 · 00:44 h (CET)]
I hope, this is enough now to stop imap-related discussion until
anything related to IMAP will be announced.
This is indeed enough.
But again: Why must we beg for such
Hello all,
Tuesday, June 9, 2009, Volker Ahrendt wrote:
This is indeed enough.
But again: Why must we beg for such information? (No, I do not want an
answer, it is again a rhetorical question.)
I do not know, maybe Stef wants to surprise betatesters with build, when
it will be prepared to
Better yet, learn to be chaotic at times like those of us
with Irish genes!
Paddy and Murphy were in a pub yesterday, St. Patrick's day, getting
really plastered and talking bar talk.
Paddy looks meditatively at the ice cubes floating in his whiskey
tonic and says, You know, lions have
On Monday, June 8, 2009, 4:23:43 PM, Marek Mikus wrote:
this build called 4.2 was not planned in january and was released now as
requested bugfix version with some additions and Postponed sending. This
is the reason.
If this is true, what will the excuse be in 4 or 5 months when 4.3
fixes
On Monday, June 8, 2009, 5:23:05 PM, Marek Mikus wrote:
customers.
those waiting on IMAP are not customers? (I only go back to 1.x)
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
photo blog at
On Monday, June 8, 2009, 4:55:39 PM, Marek Mikus wrote:
seems You care about IMAP only, but for example our customers requested
version without problem with DEP detection under Windows 2008 Server,
version with fixed incorrect handling of MIME boundary, versions with fixed
templates in
I've tried to download the corrected .msi but I can not install it
over the old 4.2.1.1 installation...
By the way, I confirm the Tip of the day error.
If I go in Help / Tip of the day, I get the Invalid image size error dialog.
Then I click OK and I get an empty tip dialog with the option
Maxim Masiutin schrieb:
Hello Tbbeta,
We didn't change the EXE file, just repacked the MSI with the new THEBAT.LNG:
www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_pro_4-2.msi
www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_home_4-2.msi
www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/intpack_4-2.msi
Hello Christian,
Sunday, June 7, 2009, 4:29:33 AM, you wrote:
Congrats on not listening to your BETA List and bringing out another
bugged version.
And once again a totally useless version for those using IMAP.
Ouch!
What is bugged in this version?
And,
What is it exactly that is required
Hi,
EJM What is it exactly that is required in IMAP?
Reliability? Usability?
EJM If its a complaint, so be it. If its a real IMAP bug, report in
EJM bug track.
Thank you. When did you last browse the bugtracker? It is full of IMAP
bug reports, some of which have been - mostly without
Hello Ethan,
A reminder of what Ethan J Mings typed on:
Sunday, June 07, 2009 at 09:39:39 GMT -0400
EJM What is it exactly that is required in IMAP? I keep hearing, reading and
EJM observing endless complaints. If its a complaint, so be it. If its
EJM a real IMAP bug, report in bug track.
Hi Ethan,
What is bugged in this version?
Same bugs as in the last version as for IMAP at least.
What is it exactly that is required in IMAP?
I deleted my IMAP account three times over the last week to get it usable
again. For some reason the message queue stalled. This was persistent even
On Sunday, June 7, 2009, 1:11:45 PM, Raymund Tump wrote:
What is it exactly that is required in IMAP?
in vista, the only way for message counts to be accurate, or for
messages which may have been read at another venue to not be treated
as unread, is to close and re open the program.
On Sunday, June 7, 2009, 8:39:39 AM, Ethan J Mings wrote:
What is it exactly that is required in IMAP? I keep hearing, reading and
observing endless complaints. If its a complaint, so be it. If its
a real IMAP bug, report in bug track.
perhaps you haven't been paying attention? we were
On zondag 7 juni 2009, 8:11:45 PM Raymund Tump wrote,
And: I think someone with knowledge about that posted that 4.2 will
be the version with IMAP working. Obviously that was marketing.
IIRC, IMAP development will be continued AFTER the establishment of
the new database format. Which could
Hello all,
Monday, June 8, 2009, Arjan de Groot wrote:
And: I think someone with knowledge about that posted that 4.2 will
be the version with IMAP working. Obviously that was marketing.
nobody told this, 4.2 is minor upgrade with more bugfixes than additions,
yes, postponed sending is
Hello Dwight,
Sunday, June 7, 2009, 3:41:40 PM, you wrote:
perhaps you haven't been paying attention?
I've been paying close attention of a long period of time. I'm a long
time member of the list.
My point was focus on moving away from general statements to concrete
points.
we were told
Hello Dwight,
Sunday, June 7, 2009, 3:37:26 PM, you wrote:
in vista, the only way for message counts to be accurate, or for
messages which may have been read at another venue to not be treated
as unread, is to close and re open the program. I have some outbox
problems where
in vista, the only way for message counts to be accurate, or for
messages which may have been read at another venue to not be treated
as unread, is to close and re open the program. I have some outbox
problems where messages either get trapped there, and never go out,
or
where
Hello Tbbeta,
We didn't change the EXE file, just repacked the MSI with the new THEBAT.LNG:
www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_pro_4-2.msi
www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_home_4-2.msi
www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/intpack_4-2.msi
Hello Maxim,
We didn't change the EXE file, just repacked the MSI with the new THEBAT.LNG:
www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_pro_4-2.msi
Installed fine. But...
- Install wizard says 4.2 (Release Candidate) everywhere.
- Splash and About screens show versions 4.2.1.1
- Control
Up and running here
I've not noted differences between the previous .msi version
--
Mackley
Italy
Current beta is 4.2.rc1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Mau,
Saturday, June 06, 2009, 0:47:12, you wrote:
- Install wizard says 4.2 (Release Candidate) everywhere.
Thank you, I will reupload the correct MSI.
- Splash and About screens show versions 4.2.1.1
This is OK.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin
Ritlabs SRL
[Reply to: »Maxim Masiutin« · 2009-06-06 · 23:24 h (CET)]
Moin, Maxim!
www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_pro_4-2.msi
- Installer Dialogs still reads TB! 4.2 (Release Candidate).
- Tooltips in Statusbar of Message Editor are gone
Cheers!
VA
- --
Volker Ahrendt | q...@ahrendt.net
Hello Volker,
- Tooltips in Statusbar of Message Editor are gone
Not here.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v4.2.1.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3
My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com
My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com
- Tooltips in Statusbar of Message Editor are gone
Not here
--
Mackley
with MS Win XP Pro SP2 italian
Current beta is 4.2.rc1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello MAU,
Saturday, June 6, 2009, 5:47:12 PM, you wrote:
M Installed fine. But...
M - Install wizard says 4.2 (Release Candidate) everywhere.
M - Splash and About screens show versions 4.2.1.1
M - Control Panel 'Add/Remove Programs' show: The Bat! Professional v4.2
M (Release Candidate).
All
Hello Maxim,
on Sunday, 7.
June 2009, at 23:24:47 [GMT +0200] you wrote regarding The Bat! 4.2
release:
We didn't change the EXE file, just repacked the MSI with the new THEBAT.LNG:
Did i miss something or since when are 'Get messages for all' etc. in
the Tools menu?
--
Ciao
Thomas
Using
[Reply to: »MAU« · 2009-06-06 · 23:56 h (CET)]
Moin, MAU!
- Tooltips in Statusbar of Message Editor are gone
Not here.
I did some more investigation:
- at least Italian, Spanish and Dutch are working
- at least English, German, Polish are not working
- other languages not tested, yet
Hello Volker,
- Tooltips in Statusbar of Message Editor are gone
Not here.
I did some more investigation:
- at least Italian, Spanish and Dutch are working
- at least English, German, Polish are not working
- other languages not tested, yet
I use English (never install any langpack) and
Hello all,
Sunday, June 7, 2009, Volker Ahrendt wrote:
- at least Italian, Spanish and Dutch are working
- at least English, German, Polish are not working
- other languages not tested, yet
I have teste English and Czech and both are working here in same way
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech
[Reply to: »Marek Mikus« · 2009-06-07 · 00:26 h (CET)]
Moin, Marek!
- at least Italian, Spanish and Dutch are working
- at least English, German, Polish are not working
- other languages not tested, yet
I have teste English and Czech and both are working here in same way
I re-downloaded
Hello Maxim,
- Install wizard says 4.2 (Release Candidate) everywhere.
Thank you, I will reupload the correct MSI.
It is OK now.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v4.2.1.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3
My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com
My
Hi MAU,
Saturday, June 6, 2009, 4:21:45 PM, you wrote:
- at least Italian, Spanish and Dutch are working
- at least English, German, Polish are not working
- other languages not tested, yet
I use English (never install any langpack) and it is working.
Mine installed fine in English,
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
