Re: Update on the Status of Software

At 10:10 [GMT+0100] on Monday February 28 (actual time - 5:10pm on Monday in Perth, Western Australia), you wrote: >>> Let us finish the current cycle first. J>> Man, this just arrived at 1542 this afternoon!!! Weird. > Yep, but it was a duplicate of a message that arrived here over a > month ago

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hallo Mic, On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:27:40 +0800GMT (28-2-2005, 9:27 +0100, where I live), you wrote: >> Let us finish the current cycle first. J> Man, this just arrived at 1542 this afternoon!!! Weird. Yep, but it was a duplicate of a message that arrived here over a month ago. -- Groetjes, Roel

Re: Update on the Status of Software

At 19:20 [GMT+0200] on Thursday January 20 (actual time - 1:20am on Friday in Perth, Western Australia), you wrote: >> I've a lot of questions, but maybe one short (because they can be >> answered with yes, no or maybe) one: >> Are you planing another BugFixing-Beta cycle after the current cycle?

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Edvinas, on 26.01.2005 at 16:15 you wrote: > 1) Write utf-8 messages (lithuanian and russian text in a message); > 2) To see both lithuanian and russian text in the same subject in >message list (of course when message is utf-8); > 3) To be able to have Lithuanian names in Lithuanian an

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Maxim, On Thursday, January 20, 2005, at 19:07, you wrote: >> Was any work done on Unicode support MM> What do you mean exactly? I want: 1) Write utf-8 messages (lithuanian and russian text in a message); 2) To see both lithuanian and russian text in the same subject in message list (of

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Dear Dierk, -->> Freitag, 21. Januar 2005, 14:11:51: >> Any chance for the next one? > Let's just let them work out this one! Too many already complained > that it takes so long. It was not meant to push them for a implementation now. Just want to find out if such thoughts are done on the AB

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: Update on the Status of Software)

At 01:18 [GMT+0100] on Sunday January 23 (actual time - 8:18am on Sunday in Perth, Western Australia), you wrote: Peter> Hello Max, Peter> on Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:41:23 +0200 GMT your local time you wrote: MM>> Is the sig delimiter now OK? MM>> X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.2.10) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B

Re[2]: Mod: Cut mark (was: Update on the Status of Software)

Hello Max, on Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:41:23 +0200 GMT your local time you wrote: MM> Is the sig delimiter now OK? MM> X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.2.10) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 ??? -- Regards, Peter Using Ritlabs TheBat! 3.0.2.10 (OS: Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2) ___

Re[4]: Update on the Status of Software

C> Het was op vrijdag 21 januari 2005 om 23:41 uur dat jij iets C> schreef over 'Update on the Status of Software' : C> Hallo Goncalo, GMM>>> I don't think that moderators are demagogs. This is contradiction in terms, >> I was referring to the

Re[3]: Update on the Status of Software

Het was op vrijdag 21 januari 2005 om 23:41 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'Update on the Status of Software' : Hallo Goncalo, GMM>> I don't think that moderators are demagogs. This is contradiction in terms, > I was referring to the concern with those people pay

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

GMM> Friday, January 21, 2005, 6:11:56 AM, Goncalo Farias wrote: GMM> I don't think that moderators are demagogs. This is contradiction in terms, I was referring to the concern with those people paying their internet per byte DL'ed. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Software Aria - The comput

Screenreaders and TB (was: Update on the Status of Software)

Hello Maxim, On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:46:37 +0200 GMT (20/01/2005, 23:46 +0700 GMT), Maxim Masiutin wrote: MM> I will give a little technical update. Thanks. MM> The batskin.ini, which was a temporary glyph definition file, will MM> no longer be read, the new file which will persist will be MM> b

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Marck, Thursday, January 20, 2005, 4:14:48 PM, you wrote: M> Just to pick you up *right* there my friend, there is an extremely M> good reason why TB does it the way it does it and why it is not M> wrong. Far from it. It is absolutely correct. Imagine a digest with M> multiple messages and m

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Eddie! On Friday, January 21, 2005 at 12:41:30 PM you wrote: > Any chance for the next one? Let's just let them work out this one! Too many already complained that it takes so long. -- Dierk Haasis :Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept The Bat 3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Chat

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Dear Maxim, -->> Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2005, 21:38:07: >> As you count the major changes of the coming Version may I ask the >> follow: Have there being any changes in the AB? I'm asking as I >> feel many times the need to have more than one (1) subfolder. > No, we didn't plan this for the u

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Paul! On Friday, January 21, 2005, 4:32 AM, you wrote: > Please restrict your correspondence to issues regarding The Bat! > beta. I, for one, will appreciate it immensely. Confirmed. I will appreciate that immensely, also. We are going to receive a new beta--in the development team's good

Re[5]: Update on the Status of Software

1/21/2005 5:17 AM Hi Goncalo, >Maybe I lost my sensibility. Maybe. Attitude is very important...no, attitude is everything! Your carping and sniping is clogging up the positive communication. Please restrict your correspondence to issues regarding The Bat! beta. I, for one, will ap

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Goncalo, On 21-01-2005 09:23, you [GF] wrote in : GF> Really, I have better things to do so I just cut the signature and GF> move on. Who else votes for a ban? GF> If this was a list that didn't have to do with TB! beta tests, you GF> could be sure that I would go elsewher

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

LG> Hi Goncalo, LG> On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, at 04:11:56 [GMT +] (which was 9:11 PM where LG> I live) you wrote: GF>> Noun: demagog GF>> 1. An orator who appeals to the passions and prejudices of his audience LG> Aren't semantics great? LG> Merriam Webster: LG> Noun: LG> a leader who makes use

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Greg Strong wrote: С Respect I believe that would be "WITH Respect". :-) -- Keith Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hi Goncalo, On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, at 04:11:56 [GMT +] (which was 9:11 PM where I live) you wrote: GF> Noun: demagog GF> 1. An orator who appeals to the passions and prejudices of his audience Aren't semantics great? Merriam Webster: Noun: a leader who makes use of popular prejudices and fals

Re[4]: Update on the Status of Software

PVN> 1/20/2005 9:41 PM PVN> Hi Goncalo, >>You're being demagog. >>No big deal with that. I already justify all the text and that >>really ONLY affects people that actually reply to the message. PVN> I believe this list existed before you joined it. Since that is PVN> the case you hav

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

GF>> You're being demagog. LG> Has nothing to do with trying to gain power. I already have it, LG> always did. That kind of happens when your the creator of LG> something. What matters is wielding that power for the greater I never meant it had anything to do with gaining power. Goo

Re[3]: Update on the Status of Software

1/20/2005 9:41 PM Hi Goncalo, >Gesh! Huge task.. don't know how you can manage that just by yourself. >You're being demagog. >No big deal with that. I already justify all the text and that really >ONLY affects people that actually reply to the message. I believe this list existed before you

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Maxim, Thursday, January 20, 2005, 10:32:41 AM, Maxim Masiutin wrote: > I think that WIR will be the most exact estimate ;-) Good answer, and good signature! > С уважением, > Maxim mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Translating your signature per http://translation2.paral

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hi Goncalo, On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, at 23:33:53 [GMT +] (which was 4:33 PM where I live) you wrote: GF> Gesh! Huge task.. don't know how you can manage that just by yourself. Netiquette exists for the same reason it's considered impolite to eat mashed potatoes with your hands. The adults learned

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

C>> Is this ALL that is bothering you? I'd say that the way people C>> address each other is a way more important item to follow. And C>> please don't come with the argument of message sizes. LG> Primarily it's messy. When someone replies to your messages, they LG> must manually cut out

Re[3]: Update on the Status of Software

N> jueves, 20 ene 2005 at 08:26, it seems you wrote: >> As read below in my prior message. TB! doesn't focus on John Doe >> home users in the first way but advanced home users and >> semiprofessionalls. And they will use IMAP more and more often. N> A lot of companies use at wor

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Dear Leif, @20-Jan-2005, 14:31 -0700 (20-Jan 21:31 UK time) Leif Gregory [LG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Cees: C>> apparently it does. why is that my fault? I'd say that The Bat! C>> should handle this particular issue in a different way. As do most C>> emailprograms as I remember LG>

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Cees, Thursday, January 20, 2005, 2:01:12 PM, you wrote: C> no... why should I? Let's see. (for reference, please read the welcome message you were sent when you subscribed). 1. You are violating section "G" of the list rules which state that you sig should be about 4-6 lines. You

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Cees! On Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 10:01:12 PM you wrote: > no... why should I? 1. Because a moderator said so. 2. Leif explained it. > I'd say that The Bat! should handle this particular issue in a different > way. As do most emailprograms as I remember How? How shou

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

Het was op donderdag 20 januari 2005 om 21:22 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'Update on the Status of Software' : Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Authenticated-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Processed: shhh.nl, Thu, 20 Jan

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Cees, > Hope that the new beta will not crash on me, as the latest started doing > ever since two days ago now. Still don't get it why that began to happen. I had the same problem till I understood that my bat doesn't like a dial-up connection if it comes to IMAP. Dialing on myself s

Re[3]: Update on the Status of Software

jueves, 20 ene 2005 at 17:46, it seems you wrote: > I will give a little technical update. The batskin.ini, which was a > temporary glyph definition file, will no longer be read, the new file > which will persist will be batskin.xml; the format of the language > file for the people who translate T

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: Update on the Status of Software)

Hello Maxim, Thursday, January 20, 2005, 1:41:23 PM, you wrote: M> Is the sig delimiter now OK? Perfect... Thank you! :-) -- __ TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B ( ) ( ___)(_ _)( ___) TBUDP Wiki Site: http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/tbudp )(__ )__)

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

> I've a lot of questions, but maybe one short (because they can be > answered with yes, no or maybe) one: > Are you planing another BugFixing-Beta cycle after the current cycle? Let us finish the current cycle first. Current beta is 3.

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

> As you count the major changes of the coming Version may I ask the > follow: Have there being any changes in the AB? I'm asking as I feel > many times the need to have more than one (1) subfolder. No, we didn't plan this for the upcoming version.

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: Update on the Status of Software)

> Not often a moderator gets to moderate a developer! Is the sig delimiter now OK? -- Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

jueves, 20 ene 2005 at 08:26, it seems you wrote: > As read below in my prior message. TB! doesn't focus on John Doe home > users in the first way but advanced home users and semiprofessionalls. > And they will use IMAP more and more often. A lot of companies use at work an Exchange server, so th

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Cees, Thursday, January 20, 2005, 9:51:28 AM, you wrote: C> first off I feel free to say thank you guys for all the hard work. C> Because I know it's a hell of a lot of work. C> Secondly, the first question that pops to mind is: will the C> languagefiles automatically be updated to the new

Re: Update on the Status of Software

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Boris, on Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:13:49 +0100GMT, you wrote: BA> Are you planing another BugFixing-Beta cycle after the current cycle? I'm just a list member with no particularly close relations to RITlabs, but I dare to say, yes, certainly! Unless /

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Thursday, January 20, 2005, 4:46:37 PM, you wrote: >> OK, it'd be nice if someone gave us the occasional update on what was >> happening, but they don't /have/ to; for what it's worth I don't even >> believe they've a moral obligation to. They're going to tell us when >> they tell us. It may be t

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Eddie, Eddie Castelli wrote (in ): > Have there being any changes in the AB? I agree that in the AB there is much potential for improvements: (Here my favorite ones) https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=1861 https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2202 https://www.ri

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Dear Maxim, -->> Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2005, 17:46:37: > I will give a little technical update. The batskin.ini, which was a > temporary glyph definition file, will no longer be read, the new > file which will persist will be batskin.xml; the format of the > language file for the people who

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Maxim Masiutin skrev: How about imap support? 9Val is currently working on that. Nice to know! But what about my other question? [quote] Also would it be possible to define a imap folder as the spam folder? I have a folder on my server named SPAM which gathers the most but I would like it to show

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hi Max, The original quoted text below was written on 20/01/2005 17:04 my local time; Has much work been done in progressing with IMAP? Much work have been done, but you will have to evaluate whether it was successful :-) Great, I look forward to testing it :-) Thanks Max. __

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Maxim, Maxim Masiutin wrote (in ): > I will give a little technical update. Thanks you very much. > Feel free to ask questions. I've a lot of questions, but maybe one short (because they can be answered with yes, no or maybe) one: Are you planing another BugFixing-B

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

> Was any work done on Unicode support What do you mean exactly? Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http:/

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

> How about imap support? 9Val is currently working on that. Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

> Has much work been done in progressing with IMAP? Much work have been done, but you will have to evaluate whether it was successful :-) Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.h

Re[4]: Update on the Status of Software

> Secondly, the first question that pops to mind is: will the languagefiles > automatically be updated to the new format when launching new 'batty'? The Bat! will read localized strings from the old LNG files as usual. Current beta is

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Maxim, On Thursday, January 20, 2005, at 18:46, you wrote: MM> Feel free to ask questions. Was any work done on Unicode support? -- Edvinas Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.c

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Maxim Masiutin skrev: Feel free to ask questions. How about imap support? I had so much trouble with it that I am using Thunderbird! And I really miss some of The Bat!'s features! My problems being: 1) Sometimes messages would not load. 2) Sometimes messages are shown to be there more then once whe

Re: Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

Quoting Maxim Masiutin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I will give a little technical update. The batskin.ini, which > was a > temporary glyph definition file, will no longer be read, the > new file > which will persist will be batskin.xml; the format of the > language > file for the people who translate

Re[3]: Update on the Status of Software

Het was op donderdag 20 januari 2005 om 17:46 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'Update on the Status of Software' : Hallo Maxim, >> they tell us. It may be they don't give us an update until they >> actually release the next version. Whatever. > I will give

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hi Max, The original quoted text below was written on 20/01/2005 16:46 my local time; Feel free to ask questions. Has much work been done in progressing with IMAP? -- Chris Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.s

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

> OK, it'd be nice if someone gave us the occasional update on what was > happening, but they don't /have/ to; for what it's worth I don't even > believe they've a moral obligation to. They're going to tell us when > they tell us. It may be they don't give us an update until they > actually release

Re[5]: Update on the Status of Software

Het was op donderdag 20 januari 2005 om 17:32 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'Update on the Status of Software' : Hallo Maxim, >> A simply inquiry which I'm sure Max will provide an answer to as he >> did before Christmas. > We could have compiled the beta to

Re[4]: Update on the Status of Software

> A simply inquiry which I'm sure Max will provide an answer to as he > did before Christmas. We could have compiled the beta today, but some things don't yet work after the rework. Such things are Quick Search etc. I think that WIR will be the most exact estimate ;-) -- С уважением, Maxim

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hi Dierk, Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2005, 09:01: > Apart from Leif declaring this thread DH'ed Sorry, but i read the DH-message afterwards. > I chime in with the biggest mantra of shareware: > Try, try, try ... before you buy. As you said. You can *try*. But only try. In 30 days you are not

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Michael! On Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 8:26:18 AM you wrote: > They promised working IMAP and the working NFS for v2 ... > Now I payed for v3 (for the same features they promised/advertised in > v2) - and still bugs, bugs, bugs. > Don't you think I have the right for a working version?

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hi Alexander, Mittwoch, 19. Januar 2005, 18:38: > Please don't drag this out of the context. I was talking about novice > users, which I understand are private home users (mostly), and those won't > use or need IMAP as often as pro/business users, if at all. Someone correct > me if this assumptio

Re[4]: Update on the Status of Software

DH> Hello Goncalo, DH> On Wednesday, January 19, 2005 at 20:47:22 GMT + (which was DH> 21:47:22 where I live), Goncalo Farias wrote and made these valuable DH> points on the subject of "Update on the Status of Software": >> It doesn't crash because

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

ASK> Hello Michael Schneider & everyone else, ASK> on 19-Jan-2005 at 12:49 you (Michael Schneider) wrote: >> TheBat! focuses on (semi)professionall users with it features, >> look&feel, etc. - not on John Doe homeusers who want to send >> funpics all two to three days. ASK> And I a

Re[3]: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Goncalo, On Wednesday, January 19, 2005 at 20:47:22 GMT + (which was 21:47:22 where I live), Goncalo Farias wrote and made these valuable points on the subject of "Update on the Status of Software": > It doesn't crash because it looks like it was built with a borl

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

ASK> Hello Michael Schneider & everyone else, ASK> on 19-Jan-2005 at 01:57 you (Michael Schneider) wrote: >> And especially the "growing number of novice users" will look for an >> client which works correctly and doesn't produce one exception after >> another, won't they? ASK> Oh come on PLEASE

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Michael Schneider & everyone else, on 19-Jan-2005 at 12:49 you (Michael Schneider) wrote: >> Doesn't concern me at all. I'm a private home user. Why would I need >> IMAP? And for the average Joe User, I bet that he'll be a POP3 user just >> as well. And TB is a superb POP3 client. > Oh. Ok

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Guten Tag Alexander, am Mittwoch, 19. Januar 2005 um 12:30 schrieben Sie: > Doesn't concern me at all. I'm a private home user. Why would I need IMAP? > And for the average Joe User, I bet that he'll be a POP3 user just as well. > And TB is a superb POP3 client. Oh. Ok. RITlabs announces IMAP an

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hallo Alexander, On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:30:24 +0100GMT (19-1-2005, 12:30 +0100, where I live), you wrote: ASK> And TB is a superb POP3 client. Sure is. >> And especially the "growing number of novice users" will look for an >> client which works correctly and doesn't produce one exception after

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Michael Schneider & everyone else, on 19-Jan-2005 at 01:57 you (Michael Schneider) wrote: > The growing number of novice users will laugh at TB! and deinstall it as > quick as you say 'hello' if they see all the nice and playfull stuff but > realize that major functions just ... *ahem* ...

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Guten Tag Alexander S. Kunz, am Dienstag, 18. Januar 2005 um 18:57 schrieben Sie: > In order to make TB more accessible to the growing number of novice users, > such features maybe just *have* to be implemented to widen the user base. The growing number of novice users will laugh at TB! and dein

Re: Mod: Bad language (was: Update on the Status of Software)

Hello Marck, Tuesday, January 18, 2005, 4:48:26 PM, you wrote: GF>> They have loads of bugs. For instance, Exchange support is completely GF>> **ed. > > Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not > just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have >

Re[3]: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Goncalo, Tuesday, January 18, 2005, 4:41:14 PM, you wrote: > We need bugfixes, that's what we need. I agree v3 has been nothing but problems on my end. -- Best regards, Timmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cu

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

ASK> Hello Michael Schneider & everyone else, ASK> on 18-Jan-2005 at 00:54 you (Michael Schneider) wrote: ASK> If you don't like Smilies or the Mailchat, chances are you won't like some ASK> of the coming features, for example the (accidentally already pre-released) ASK> "Wizards". You can start

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

DH> Hello Greg! DH> On Tuesday, January 18, 2005 at 5:32:34 PM you wrote: >> I thought you were German. DH> I take it you didn't mean that as an insult. (grin) Did you address the question? I guess Ive miss that! :) -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias If brains were C-4, Saddam Hussein couldn'

Re[3]: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Goncalo, On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 you wrote in GF> Is that so, uh? I guess you need to cool down a little. What do you GF> think? Oh ye gods. Another one crawls out from under the stones to start mouthing off. -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.0.2.10 & SpamPal | Win

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

MDP> It is *precisely* for this reason that they have stopped MDP> releasing software on deadline. That is incompatible with the MDP> goal of fixing bugs. And it took them this much versions to figure it out? MS>> It seems that RITlabs needs to be rapped on the knuckles! MDP> I d

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

DH> Hello Michael! DH> On Tuesday, January 18, 2005 at 10:28:57 AM you wrote: >> Oh yeah. I gave you a strict military order and wanted you to jump >> up and down ;-) DH> As I always say, smileys don't make it better. Don't get an attitude, he wasn't being rude. DH> Now, to get this straig

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Greg Strong & everyone else, on 18-Jan-2005 at 19:24 you (Greg Strong) wrote: >> In order to make TB more accessible to the growing number of novice >> users, such features maybe just *have* to be implemented to widen the >> user base. > I don't want to put words in your mouth nor intend t

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Alexander, Tuesday, January 18, 2005, 11:57:55 AM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: >> and >> Version which focus on bugfixing or stupid addons like Smilies or >> mailchat again? > I'd be happy if that discussion would not start again. There will always be > things that some find "stupid" while ot

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Greg Strong & everyone else, on 18-Jan-2005 at 16:59 you (Greg Strong) wrote: > Although I speak English I am concerned about Ritlabs and TB reaching > the product's market potential. Will the revised help text be > available for all languages included in the International Pack? I'd say th

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Allie! On Tuesday, January 18, 2005, 11:53 AM, you wrote: >> Other needs--and wishes--by TB! users are, I am confident, being >> addressed in the same way, quietly, behind the scenes. I have seen >> comments by Allie Martin, for instance, from time to time, about >> the work he is helping w

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Michael Schneider & everyone else, on 18-Jan-2005 at 00:54 you (Michael Schneider) wrote: > and > Version which focus on bugfixing or stupid addons like Smilies or > mailchat again? I'd be happy if that discussion would not start again. There will always be things that some find "stupid" w

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hi Mary Bull, On 18/01/2005 09:02 AM, you wrote: > Other needs--and wishes--by TB! users are, I am confident, being > addressed in the same way, quietly, behind the scenes. I have seen > comments by Allie Martin, for instance, from time to time, about the > work he is helping with on IMAP. Me? I

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Dierk, Tuesday, January 18, 2005, 10:39:46 AM, Dierk Haasis wrote: >> I thought you were German. > I take it you didn't mean that as an insult. (grin) Not at all! I was stating what I thought was fact although I may be wrong. If I'm wrong, it wouldn't be the first time, and I'm sure not t

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Mary! On Tuesday, January 18, 2005, 10:39 AM, you wrote: > [Dierk] writes as well in English as any living person, professional > or otherwise, that I have read in my 73 years of reading English. I'd just like to add to that, and say also that he writes far more capably than the vast major

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Greg! On Tuesday, January 18, 2005, 10:32 AM, you wrote: >>> I cannot answer as to RITLabs intentions and production. We >>> (Dierk and I) writing in English. >> Since my own command of German isn't that bad a German version may >> eventually crop up. > I thought you were German. If I'm r

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Greg! On Tuesday, January 18, 2005 at 5:32:34 PM you wrote: > I thought you were German. I take it you didn't mean that as an insult. (grin) > If I'm right, wouldn't your German be better than your English? There's been some doubt about it, not the least from myself. If you ask my last e

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Dierk, Tuesday, January 18, 2005, 10:23:38 AM, Dierk Haasis wrote: >> I cannot answer as to RITLabs intentions and production. We >> (Dierk and I) writing in English. > Since my own command of German isn't that bad a German version may > eventually crop up. I thought you were German. If I

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Dennis! On Tuesday, January 18, 2005 at 5:07:05 PM you wrote: > I cannot answer as to RITLabs intentions and production. We > (Dierk and I) writing in English. Since my own command of German isn't that bad a German version may eventually crop up. But let's first go through with the most un

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Quoting Greg Strong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello Dennis, > > Tuesday, January 18, 2005, 6:46:04 AM, Dennis Hays wrote: > Although I speak English I am concerned about Ritlabs and TB > reaching > the product's market potential. Will the revised help text be > available for all languages included i

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Dennis, Tuesday, January 18, 2005, 6:46:04 AM, Dennis Hays wrote: > RITLabs has agreed to a proposal Dierk Haasis and I submitted > regarding the re-write and updating of the Help text. Currently, > Dierk and I are busy reformatting, redesigning, and rewriting. IMHO an improved and more cu

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

Tuesday, January 18, 2005, 7:46:04 AM, you wrote: > RITLabs has agreed to a proposal Dierk Haasis and I submitted > regarding the re-write and updating of the Help text. Currently, > Dierk and I are busy reformatting, redesigning, and rewriting. Thank you. Jerry -- Ethan J. Mings Principal, T

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Dennis! On Tuesday, January 18, 2005, 6:46 AM, you wrote: > Quoting Marck D Pearlstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > --snipped-- >> They have announced right here that their version / beta release >> policy has changed and that they will never again release >> bug-rid

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Quoting Marck D Pearlstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: --snipped-- > They have announced right here that their version / beta > release > policy has changed and that they will never again release > bug-ridden > versions just because marketing tell them the time is right. > An

Re[2]: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Dierk, On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 you wrote in DH> Whatever you do, whatever your attitude as a company, you cannot win. A worldwide problem. If there's even the smallest thing to moan at there'll always be someone who'll come out from hiding and moan and then go back agai

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Ethan! On Tuesday, January 18, 2005 at 1:22:31 PM you wrote: > Again, the best person to answer this question is Max and he will do > so when he can. Jerry, if you believe this statement, which you uttered two times now in this thread, why do you ask over and over again? -- Dierk Haa

Re[6]: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Ethan, On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 you wrote in EJM> I simply don't agree. OK, well just agree to differ. It's just that, if someone asks the question once, it's easy to ignore and just hit the delete button. After a few times it gets a bit wearing. We're all waiting of the

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hello Richard! On Tuesday, January 18, 2005 at 1:11:05 PM you wrote: > And my answer was just as simple. Be patient and wait for a, hopefully, > fairly bug free beta which will be released when they are ready to > release it. Let me add that TB is still rather on the good side. I use a number of

Re[5]: Update on the Status of Software

Tuesday, January 18, 2005, 7:11:05 AM, you wrote: EJM>> Time lines are important. > Sorry but that's rubbish in this case. It doesn't make a penny worth of > difference whether they bring out the beta tomorrow or this time next > week. I'm sure they're trying to get the best possible programme

  1   2   >