Re: Status bar giving wrong connection type

2005-06-27 Thread Liz
Hi Allie, In the message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] which was apparently written on Monday, June 27, 2005, 1:48:12 AM. I believe you wrote: AM And yet the status bar says 'Plain' over towards the right. I get the same, and when I wave my mouse over it it tells me the Plain is for OTFE or not.. and

Re: Status bar giving wrong connection type

2005-06-27 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello Allie, Today, on Monday, 27 June 2005 at 02:48 AM your (Allie Martin) wrote: My main account is using IMAP over SSL. And yet the status bar says 'Plain' over towards the right. Are you sure that status bar indication is for connection type? I'm nearly sure this area shows Plain or

Re: Status bar giving wrong connection type

2005-06-27 Thread Natasha V Pearce
Hi Manuel My main account is using IMAP over SSL. And yet the status bar says 'Plain' over towards the right. Are you sure that status bar indication is for connection type? I'm nearly sure this area shows Plain or OTFE, so indicates the OTFE use. Correct. Nevertheless, a indication

Re: 3.5.31 vs 3.5.30

2005-06-27 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Gleason, On 26-06-2005 04:47, you [GP] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: GP One problem that I have had for the last 10 betas or so is that I GP will often get a notice saying that TB was unable to prepare the GP message for uploading when trying to send email.  I am not out of GP disk space.  I

Re: 3.5.31 vs 3.5.30

2005-06-27 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Vili, On 26-06-2005 13:36, you [V] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: If you were an Exchange user like Vili you would probably think otherwise. ASK Please don't mix things up. The objection towards the public release of .31 ASK is valid, and I never said anything else. ASK I will try the

Re: Status bar giving wrong connection type

2005-06-27 Thread Tony Boom
--On Sunday, June 26, 2005 7:48 pm -0500 Allie Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This little buglet is just for Tony. :) Tony's lost interest. -- Tony iMac Current beta is 3.5.31 | 'Using TBBETA' information:

Re: The Bat! 3.5.0.31 is now available

2005-06-27 Thread 9Val
Hi Vilius, VS I can't find it. Where it is hidden? ;) Folder properties/Maximum number of message ... Folder properties/Keep messages for ... days -- 9Val Current

Re: A little roadmap

2005-06-27 Thread 9Val
Hi Thomas, TF I still cannot assign a short-cut to message encodings. ... TF Also, I cannot assign a short-cut to the interface language. It is limitation of new UI, we have not yet found workaround. -- 9Val

Re: 3.5.31 vs 3.5.30

2005-06-27 Thread 9Val
Hi Mary, MB Whereas, Maxim had been announcing the previous few betas, 3.5.25, MB 3.5.26-29, and 3.5.30. MB So, I think 9Val did the misnumbering--or at the very least failed to MB catch it, of this beta 3.5.0.31--because he had been away and the MB change to th more realistic numbering system

Re: Blank Menuitem

2005-06-27 Thread MAU
Hello Roger, I have one blank item in the Specials menu. See attachment M Not here. See attachment. Perhaps you don't have a tbuser.def file installed? Yes, I do have a tbuser.def file. With 497 lines. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.5.0.31

Re: Status bar giving wrong connection type

2005-06-27 Thread Allie Martin
On Monday, June 27, 2005 at 1:30:48 AM [GMT -0500], Manuel Breitfeld wrote: Are you sure that status bar indication is for connection type? I'm nearly sure this area shows Plain or OTFE, so indicates the OTFE use. Ooops!!! Forget my little disturbance of the peace here. now back under his

The Bat! 3.5.0.31 - problems with Exchange server

2005-06-27 Thread Zygmunt Wereszczynski
Hello all! Last beta (3.5.0.31) has problems with message sending via Exchange server. I am not able to send any message (receiving is possible). Message sending worked correctly in previous versions. In my Exchange account log I have on one PC following information. !27/06/2005, 12:15:54:

Re: 3.5.31 vs 3.5.30

2005-06-27 Thread Mary Bull
Hello 9Val! On Monday, June 27, 2005, 4:06 AM, you wrote: MB Whereas, Maxim had been announcing the previous few betas, 3.5.25, MB 3.5.26-29, and 3.5.30. MB So, I think 9Val did the misnumbering--or at the very least failed to MB catch it, of this beta 3.5.0.31--because he had been away and the

Re: 3.5.31 vs 3.5.30

2005-06-27 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Natasha! On Monday, June 27, 2005, 12:42 AM, you wrote: BayesIt error was detected a few days later after the release I think that Natasha spotted it within a few hours I wanted to recant my earlier acceptance, and in so doing I made it more difficult than it should have been for Maxim

Re: Blank Menuitem

2005-06-27 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Natasha! On Monday, June 27, 2005, 12:24 AM, you wrote: ... Wasn't sure I had been clear. I certainly found it very clear. Thanks. I appreciate the feedback. I've added a note detailing my own experiments with tbuser.def. Basically, my only solution at the moment (since I don't want

Re: Blank Menuitem

2005-06-27 Thread Mary Bull
Hello MAU! On Monday, June 27, 2005, 4:12 AM, you wrote: I have one blank item in the Specials menu. See attachment M Not here. See attachment. Perhaps you don't have a tbuser.def file installed? Yes, I do have a tbuser.def file. With 497 lines. I wrote a bug note for this issue,

Re: The Bat! 3.5.0.31 is now available

2005-06-27 Thread 9Val
Hi Bill, [-] NFS: (#0004808) %FolderName macro didn't worked BM It still doesn't work properly. BM Suppose I have a folder with full name: BM \\Bill\Lists\foo BM The macro only returns: foo It works as expected, you can check the same macro in new message template and it

Re[2]: 3.5.31 vs 3.5.30

2005-06-27 Thread Vili
Hello Peter, PF On 26-06-2005 13:36, you [V] wrote in PF mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: If you were an Exchange user like Vili you would probably think otherwise. ASK Please don't mix things up. The objection towards the public release of .31 ASK is valid, and I never said anything else. ASK I will

Re[2]: 3.5.31 vs 3.5.30

2005-06-27 Thread Vili
Hello Peter, V I am happy that you will try, and you will see, it does not work. I am V againts public release because of the reasons you could read in my V prev. mail. PF For me TB! works with an Exchange server (see sig) - with the IMAP PF protocol. Sorry, now I checked your sig... Hmm,

Re: 3.5.31 vs 3.5.30

2005-06-27 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Vili, On 27-06-2005 14:16, you [V] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: V Sorry, now I checked your sig... Hmm, then I dont know what the V problem is. I just replaced the DLL and the EXE of v30 with the v31, V and it stopped working for me... V Did you manage to download the emails from the MAPI

Re: Blank Menuitem

2005-06-27 Thread Natasha V Pearce
Hi Mary I did read that, and wished I had taken your approach. However, it was a good review for me to have to deal again with Customise in order to get my previous Customization back--and not unbearably onerous, since I don't use shortcuts and had only removed some icons from the

Re: OT Couth Mary [Re: 3.5.30 MSI]

2005-06-27 Thread Natasha V Pearce
Hi Avi Depending on one's upbringing, some words will be either rude or blatantly offensive, while a different culture may consider the same words nothing special. My personal opinion, FWIW, is that cultural expectations go far beyond what is or isn't considered appropriate

Re: [Usability] The most un-obvious things

2005-06-27 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: Volker Ahrendt · 2005-06-19 · 23:14 h (CET)] Hello, Volker! VAThere are *two* entries: Max [EMAIL PROTECTED] VA Müller Confirmed, and the message doesn't get sent. Reason: The second line is interpreted as recipient Müller Müller (no quotes) which

Re: Blank Menuitem

2005-06-27 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Natasha! On Monday, June 27, 2005, 8:19 AM, you wrote: Marek Mikus put Confirmed to the issue, immediately, as you may have noticed. So I'm hopeful the matter will get further attention from the development team. Here's hoping. Customisation is still a major focus for the team, so I

Re: 3.5.31 vs 3.5.30

2005-06-27 Thread Natasha V Pearce
Hi Mary I don't run any plug-ins, or any anti-spam software whatsoever. And, I don't have the habit of looking in the directory each time I change versions. I'm running anti-spam and anti-virus plug-ins, and until this release had never had a problem. It was quite a surprise when this one

Re: IMAP: Long Pause when loading first message in large mailbox

2005-06-27 Thread 9Val
Hi Allie, AM On checking the logs, I see that TB! rechecks the flag status for all AM messages in the mailbox. So if there are 4000 message, the flags for all AM those messages seem to be rechecked and updated as needed. This happens AM for a mailbox every time I select the mailbox after new

Re: Blank Menuitem

2005-06-27 Thread Natasha V Pearce
Hi Mary I got a BT e-mail created 7:14:37 (my time--U.S. Central Daylight time zone) which says the issue has been Assigned. Yay! To Robo. We're in good hands, just as you said! :girlcheer: I got this one, too. And please allow me to join you in the :girlcheer: ! -- Groetjes Natasha The

Re: 3.5.31 vs 3.5.30

2005-06-27 Thread Vili
V Did you manage to download the emails from the MAPI szerver? It have set up TB! to communicate with the company Exchange server using the IMAP protocol (under Account Properties Transport). I have no problems with getting/sending mail at all. I do not know if it works with the MAPI protocol as

Re: 3.5.31 vs 3.5.30

2005-06-27 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Vili everyone else, on 27-Jun-2005 at 16:37 you (Vili) wrote: How can you communicate with Exchange server using IMAP??? Is it possible That needs MAPI, doesnt it? MS Exchange is an email server. It can provide access from outside to its mailboxes via IMAP and POP3, given that the

Re: Do not release v3.5.31

2005-06-27 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Vili everyone else, on 25-Jun-2005 at 13:16 you (Vili) wrote: 3.5.31 cannot send/receive mails to/from MS Exchange server. I can't confirm this one, but something's definitely screwed up here. I connect to MS Exchange 2003 in our AD using MAPI. I started to download messages. My mailbox

Re: The Bat! 3.5.0.31 is now available

2005-06-27 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Mon 27-Jun-05 7:09am -0500, 9Val wrote: [-] NFS: (#0004808) %FolderName macro didn't worked BM It still doesn't work properly. BM Suppose I have a folder with full name: BM \\Bill\Lists\foo BM The macro only returns: foo It works as expected, you can check the same macro

Re: A little roadmap

2005-06-27 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello 9Val, On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 11:22:24 +0300 GMT (27/06/2005, 15:22 +0700 GMT), 9Val wrote: TF I still cannot assign a short-cut to message encodings. 9 ... TF Also, I cannot assign a short-cut to the interface language. 9 It is limitation of new UI, we have not yet found workaround. Thanks

Re: The Bat! 3.5.0.31 is now available

2005-06-27 Thread Zygmunt Wereszczynski
On Monday, June 27, 2005, at 15:09:05 [UTC+0300] (Monday, June 27, 2005 14:09 my local time) 9Val wrote: BM Suppose I have a folder with full name: BM \\Bill\Lists\foo BM The macro only returns: foo It works as expected, you can check the same macro in new message template and it

AV in Network and Administration

2005-06-27 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi all, I didn't find the time yet to follow all the discussion about the latest version here or on BT, and I'm not sure if I will, so there is a good chance that I may have missed this bug being mentioned. I installed The Bat! freshly on my

Re: IMAP: Long Pause when loading first message in large mailbox

2005-06-27 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Allie, Monday, June 27, 2005, 1:56:32 AM, you wrote: I don't know about everyone else and opinions on this would be nice. This is my biggest single grievance with TB. Having no feedback during this sort of activity is not nice, especially when the user is in the dark about what's

Re: IMAP: Long Pause when loading first message in large mailbox

2005-06-27 Thread Tony Boom
--On Monday, June 27, 2005 7:52 pm +0100 Clive Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A progress bar would be useful BUT the real solution is to make IMAP work better! Why, what's wrong with it as it is? :) -- Tony iMac Current beta

Re[2]: IMAP: Long Pause when loading first message in large mailbox

2005-06-27 Thread Allie Martin
On Monday, June 27, 2005, at 09:05 AM, 9Val wrote: AM I also question the efficiency of the flag updating. It makes having AM large IMAP mailbox prohibitive when it really shouldn't be. I'm hoping AM that this can be optimised somehow. Just finished some optimizations, they will be available

Re: AV in Network and Administration

2005-06-27 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Peter Meyns everyone else, on 27-Jun-2005 at 20:45 you (Peter Meyns) wrote: in Options -- Network and Administration I cannot change anything (see attachment). Clicking ok on the AV window leaves the cursor as the hourglass, but I can click Cancel anyway, and TB! moves on fine. No

Re: Do not release v3.5.31

2005-06-27 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Alexander, On 27-06-2005 17:29, you [ASK] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ASK However, this MAPI connection, I beg your pardon, it sucks. Its ASK better to connect to Exchange via IMAP. MAPI downloads *all* ASK messages on the server. MAPI access to Exchange can only be a ASK workaround. If TB

Re: IMAP: Long Pause when loading first message in large mailbox

2005-06-27 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Allie, On 27-06-2005 02:56, you [AM] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: AM I just re-discovered how to enable verbose logging for an account. (snip) I don't have such large mailboxes as you know but I can sympathize. AM I don't know about everyone else and opinions on this would be nice. AM

Re: 3.5.31 can not stop search on message finder

2005-06-27 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Vili everyone else, on 26-Jun-2005 at 23:36 you (Vili) wrote: Someone has compared TB! search to Total Commander. That is bullshit. Thank you, very kind. TC search is dumb, just text search in a file. TB! search in RECORDS... That is true, that it should not hang... But it CANNOT

3.5.31 unsolicited rogue

2005-06-27 Thread Charlene Ferrara
Hello all, I did a folder maintenance and came across a strange thing: some of my sent mails showed my rogue, which would be pretty normal if they had been sent from this account. But that specific account had no x- rogue in it's template included and yet I clearly saw my picture. I haven't done

Re: 3.5.31 unsolicited rogue

2005-06-27 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Charlene, A reminder of what Charlene Ferrara typed on: June 27, 2005 at 23:16:29 GMT +0200 CF I did a folder maintenance and came across a strange thing: some of my CF sent mails showed my rogue, which would be pretty normal if they had CF been sent from this account. Do you have

Re: 3.5.31 unsolicited rogue

2005-06-27 Thread Charlene Ferrara
Hi Charlene Ferrara, Monday, June 27, 2005 you let us know -at least in parts- : .. sometimes I go to the desired account and hit F5, write my mail and attach the file before sending. So I can't be more specific, it might be the way I send a file or write a mail, but I am not sure about it

Re: 3.5.31 unsolicited rogue

2005-06-27 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Charlene! On Monday, June 27, 2005, 4:16 PM, you wrote: I did a folder maintenance and came across a strange thing: some of my sent mails showed my rogue, which would be pretty normal if they had been sent from this account. But that specific account had no x- rogue in it's template

Re: Do not release v3.5.31

2005-06-27 Thread Zygmunt Wereszczynski
On Saturday, June 25, 2005, at 13:16:12 [UTC+0200] (Saturday, June 25, 2005 13:16 my local time) Vili wrote: MM Is 3.5.31 generally better than 3.5.30? Should we update the MSI MM and the download page? Before you dont fix this bug, DO NOT RELEASE IT. I sent into the TBBETA list

Re: 3.5.31 unsolicited rogue

2005-06-27 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Stuart Cuddy everyone else, on 27-Jun-2005 at 23:26 you (Stuart Cuddy) wrote: Do you have your picture set in your address book? If so it may be overriding the rougue. I had the same idea. However, I'm not entirely sure how Charlene meant it, because she writes: some of my sent

Re: 3.5.31 unsolicited rogue

2005-06-27 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Alexander, A reminder of what Alexander S. Kunz typed on: June 27, 2005 at 23:53:16 GMT +0200 ASK If your picture is in the address book, it'll will show up for all sent ASK mails that are sent (from an email address that is in the address book ASK entry for yourself). If not all of

Re[2]: Blank Menuitem

2005-06-27 Thread NetVicious
sábado, 25 jun 2005 at 20:36, it seems you wrote: Maybe it has to do with the fact that I am using TB without any language/international pack? If the bug it's on the LNG the Bug it's in the English official language of RT and in the spanish LNG I translated that it's at 100% of

Re[2]: Blank Menuitem

2005-06-27 Thread NetVicious
domingo, 26 jun 2005 at 00:54, it seems you wrote: The picture of AB Import menu is attached. This is what I have. RT fixed it in the new LNG (International Pack) hours ago. The translators should translate the string in every language. The Spanish LNG was updated minutes ago ;-) --

Re[2]: Blank Menuitem

2005-06-27 Thread NetVicious
domingo, 26 jun 2005 at 22:03, it seems you wrote: So, a BT note is definitely needed. What is polite to do here? Should I wait for NetVicious (who began this thread) to weigh back in and perhaps write something and post us a link? I added a note to your BT. Sorry! Sorry, I went out this

Re: Blank Menuitem

2005-06-27 Thread Zygmunt Wereszczynski
On Tuesday, June 28, 2005, at 00:16:38 [UTC+0200] (Tuesday, June 28, 2005 00:16 my local time) NetVicious wrote: The picture of AB Import menu is attached. This is what I have. RT fixed it in the new LNG (International Pack) hours ago. The translators should translate the string in

Re: Blank Menuitem

2005-06-27 Thread Mary Bull
Hello NetVicious! On Monday, June 27, 2005, 5:11 PM, you wrote: So, a BT note is definitely needed. What is polite to do here? Should I wait for NetVicious (who began this thread) to weigh back in and perhaps write something and post us a link? I added a note to your BT. Sorry! Sorry, I

Re: 3.5.31 unsolicited rogue

2005-06-27 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Stuart! On Monday, June 27, 2005, 5:07 PM, you wrote: Point well taken. Maybe Mary's other suggestion is correct. After all she is the Rogue Queen. :) No, no--Keeper of the Smileys, only! I have nothing to do with Rogues or Roguemoticons. Might be I'm the Idiot Queen! ;) -- Best

Re: Message navigation shortcuts

2005-06-27 Thread NetVicious
domingo, 19 jun 2005 at 17:32, it seems you wrote: This enhancement is a major improvement from user POV. Using the spacebar alone for navigation just doesn't cut it for me since it forces you to scroll entire messages before being able to move to the next unread message. I prefer this one

Re[2]: 3.5.31 vs 3.5.30

2005-06-27 Thread Vili
Hello Alexander, How can you communicate with Exchange server using IMAP??? Is it possible That needs MAPI, doesnt it? ASK MS Exchange is an email server. It can provide access from outside to its ASK mailboxes via IMAP and POP3, given that the IMAP and POP3 services are ASK running on the

Re[2]: Do not release v3.5.31

2005-06-27 Thread Vili
Hello Zygmunt, ZW On Saturday, June 25, 2005, at 13:16:12 [UTC+0200] (Saturday, June 25, 2005 ZW 13:16 my local time) Vili wrote: MM Is 3.5.31 generally better than 3.5.30? Should we update the MSI MM and the download page? Before you dont fix this bug, DO NOT RELEASE IT. I sent into the