Re: The Bat! 3.72.10 (Beta) is now available

2006-04-15 Thread Martin Sebald
Hello all, up and running with OTFE, POP3-only. But see attached picture. I have this issue for about 4 to 5 betas now. Is this how attachments should be shown? Regards, Martin -- The Bat! v3.72.10 (Beta) powered by Windows 2003 5.2 Build 3790 Service Pack 1 ConCarne cooks best since 1998 ht

Re: The Bat! 3.72.10 (Beta) is now available

2006-04-15 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi all, yes, I'm talking about this square character which seems to be there by mistake. I know that I can choose between several viewing modes. I hope that Ritlabs removes the characters. It does not look nice. Regards, Martin -- The Bat! v3.72.10 (Beta) powered by Windows 2003 5.2 Build 379

Re: The Bat! 3.80 Release Candidate 1 is now available

2006-04-26 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi 9Val, up and running and still seeing the bug I mentioned for 3.72.10 (Beta) on April 15th, see mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Attached again a screenshot of the bug. Because again minor bugs get ignored here in the beta list I submitted the bug the bugtracker site, see: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/vi

Re: 3.95.03

2006-12-22 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi all, up and running with OTFE. Regards, Martin > Friday, December 22, 2006, 8:33:02 PM: > Hello Tbbeta, > [-] (#0006134) "Access violation message" under Windows 2000 and below > when connecting to dotted-decimal IP addresses. > [-] Bug with permanent main form activation under Win9x > Ple

Re: .05 fixes Win9x issues

2006-12-23 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi all, up and running on Windows Server 2003 and OTFE. But... ...what is TB doing on the hard disc all the time since startup? Permanent access... This was also in .04 version. It also takes 10% CPU from time to time (when idling) and ~80MB of RAM... -- The Bat! v3.95.5 powered by Windows 20

Re: .05 fixes Win9x issues

2006-12-24 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Peter! >> ...what is TB doing on the hard disc all the time since startup? >> Permanent access... > I don't know whether this is what you are seeing, but what TB does once > every second on my system can be seen here: > http://www.ot-track.de/thebat/tb-access.gif. I did not go as far as you, I

Re: 3.95.08

2007-01-16 Thread Martin Sebald
Good morning! > Hello, 3.95.08 is available at > http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb39508.rar up and running with OTFE. Regards, Martin -- The Bat! v3.95.8 powered by Windows 2003 5.2 Build 3790 Service Pack 1 ConCarne cooks best since 1998 http://www.concarne.org smime

Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2007-02-11 Thread Martin Sebald
Hello all, again I'm missing some of my folders... :-( Again Ctrl-Alt-Shift-L does not work! TB does nothing when pressing this. Not even a dialogue that nothing was found. Am I too stupid for this? Why does this work for everybody exept me? Again I don't know exactly what folders are missing e

Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2007-02-11 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Mark! >> Again Ctrl-Alt-Shift-L does not work! TB does nothing when pressing >> this. Not even a dialogue that nothing was found. Am I too stupid for >> this? Why does this work for everybody exept me? > If it is of any consolation to you Ctrl-Alt-Shift-L has NEVER worked for > me. Ah intere

Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2007-02-12 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Paul! >> Why does this work for everybody exept me? >> Again I am complaining about a serious bug (and again nobody of Ritlabs >> will care about this). Loosing folders is bad, especially when having >> OTFE enabled. > If only you are affected I doubt this is a "serious bug" but rather a > lo

Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2007-02-12 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Hendrik! >>> Again Ctrl-Alt-Shift-L does not work! TB does nothing when pressing >>> this. Not even a dialogue that nothing was found. Am I too stupid for >>> this? Why does this work for everybody exept me? >> If it is of any consolation to you Ctrl-Alt-Shift-L has NEVER worked for >> me. > D

Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2007-02-12 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Paul! >> Or how do you call it when for example Windows is loosing folders from >> time to time? "Oh no problem, must be a user problem... Don't blame >> Microsoft!" > Dunno' been using computers 20 years and consulting for 18 and am still > waiting for it to happen. I use win2K and xandros s

Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2007-02-12 Thread Martin Sebald
il (maybe not everybody keeps a 2 year history of this list). ===8<===This is a forwarded message Von: Martin Sebald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Roelof Otten Datum: Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2005, 17:45:10 [GMT +0100] Betreff: Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list! ===8<

Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2007-02-12 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Alexander! >> again I'm missing some of my folders... :-( > I wonder what happened before they went missing. Just nothing... Or let me say so: I cannot remember anything happening the last weeks or months. Just rebooting from time to time, but every time I closed TB before rebooting. >> Again

Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2007-02-12 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Alexander! >> And as I said: Nobody from Ritlabs is caring about this anyhow. Is this >> how Ritlabs says "Thank you" to beta testers? I should really reconsider >> this, maybe also using TB as a "normal" user. > Well, feel free to do so. Maybe it will spare us your unconstructive > criticism.

Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2007-02-12 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Paul! > Well said and necessary. Whining from anywhere is a pain and when the > credibility of the source has not been established it is a royal pain in > the patootie! You're my personal hero. What's your problem? Maybe that you lost in the round of the last sixteen against Portugal last su

Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2007-02-13 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Roelof, Hi Alexander! >>> I sure have weekly backups or at least backups every two weeks. But the >>> folders on the hard disc don't help much, because the names are also >>> encrypted. >> I thought the folder configuration was kept in a file account.flb or >> something like that - so this wou

Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2007-02-13 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Bob, Hi Thomas! >> Would it help - and make your life easier - if your TB folders AND TB >> were on your C: drive? Or wouldn't that help with this lost folders >> problem that I gather is not completely new to you? > I certainly advise against that. My Windows XP is currently unusable > (deta

Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2007-02-13 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Alexander! >>> If only you are affected [...] >> He is not. >> However, here it only happens with Virtual Folders - create them, close >> TheBat, open TheBat - poof, folder vanished into thin air. This is >> completly reproducable. >> (As always, this is seen using v3.0.1.33.) > The first thin

Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2007-02-13 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Paul! >>> If only you are affected [...] >> He is not. >> However, here it only happens with Virtual Folders - create them, close >> TheBat, open TheBat - poof, folder vanished into thin air. This is >> completly reproducable. >> (As always, this is seen using v3.0.1.33.) > I have used TB sinc

Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2007-02-21 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi all, Hi Alexander! It took a while for me to come back to this thread. Sorry. Had a lot of things to do, including server upgrade... ;-) >> Talking about "unconstructive" stuff we should talk about Paul first... >> ;-) > Well, its only natural that your tone of voice triggers similar > respon

Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2007-02-21 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Miguel! >> Well if you think so. I posted this on December, 6th, 2005, and nothing >> happened exept one post from Roelof. Also no suggestion or some >> questions regarding my "special" environment from Ritlabs. > And... did you open any BT report? Even though they may take no action, > Ritlabs

Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2007-02-21 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Mark! > I have better things to do than reporting about folders disappearing from > TB! It's something that has been going on for years and I have to type in > the names one by one every time. It often takes some time before I see > they have disapeared (f.i. when a message that should have bee

Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2007-02-21 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Miguel! >> A second reason is that I often sychronize TB to my notebook. For this >> the quickest solution is synchronizing the TB directory (everything, >> which means program files plus data files, is inside this directory) to >> the same location (in my environment D:\INTERNET\TheBat) plus c

Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2007-02-21 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Paul! >> VERY time-consuming because you have to use several tools to sync the >> folders in folder view and on the hard drive. I don't lie when I write >> that this takes hours. > Right-clicking on a folder and choosing Delete instead of Empty... > I know, been there & done that. Hm and

Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2007-02-21 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Alexander, Hi Paul! From you're directorylisting I can see that the folder configuration is named account.flb no matter if the installation is in OTFE mode or in plain mode. >>> Not here. The file is named account.efb and is encrypted. >> I didn't know what the file .efb was. Ap

Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2007-02-21 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Alexander! >> As you can see, a lot of junk is there also. It seems that migrating to >> OTFE did not vanish all the unencrypted files (see file date/time). > Not only that. Updating from an older version to a newer version (like > v1/v2 or v2/v3) does not remove old config files either. Oh

Re: The Bat! 3.98.2.2 resolves the editor save issue

2007-03-02 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Maxim, as 3.98.1 (haven't reported that) it does not start on Vista. thebat.exe shows up with 95-99% CPU in task manager but does not do anything after asking for the master password. -- Regards, Martin The Bat! v3.98.2 powered by Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6000 ConCarne cooks best since 199

Re: The Bat! 3.98.02

2007-03-02 Thread Martin Sebald
Hello all! > Nope - it's a show stopper!!! (Reverting right now). I can't actually > send a message with this version. Confirmed, same problem here. I also cannot send some of the messages. Sometimes it works when deactivating S/MIME signature, sometimes not. A real show stopper for me, too. Prob

Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2007-03-02 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Alexander! >> I will do so. Although I don't have much faith that something is >> happening because of this entry into bugtracker. > Have you removed the old config files from your account directory? Maybe > TB mistakenly used your old folder config file for whatever reason (which > surely is a

Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2007-03-02 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Miguel! >>> I'm wondering if your lost folders could be a consequence of this. >> Hmmm, I don't think so. As you see above the procedure is very easy to >> handle. > Anyway, if I was you (and if you can live with it), I wouldn't do any > 'synchronization' for a while and see if TB looses any f

Re: Again: lost folders in folder-list!

2007-03-02 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Alexander! >> Thank you for that link. I will go through this when I have some time >> and passion left. ;-) > Well, given your passionate :-) posts here, there should be plenty! ;-) *fg* Time is always a problem here and cannot be solved by new TB versions. ;-) But I will have a look at thi

Re: The Bat! 3.98.02

2007-03-02 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Marek! >>> Nope - it's a show stopper!!! (Reverting right now). I can't actually >>> send a message with this version. >> Confirmed, same problem here. I also cannot send some of the messages. >> Sometimes it works when deactivating S/MIME signature, sometimes not. A >> real show stopper for me

Re: The Bat 3.98.2.2 on Vista

2007-03-02 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Maxim! > I cannot reproduce the bug https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6271 > It runs well on Vista here. Can you send any clues? Interesting. I tried again and this time it worked. Had the same problem with version 3.98.1 yesterday. I tried this version 4 or 5 times and it never worked a

Re: (no subject)

2007-03-02 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Maxim, up and running with OTFE. -- Regards, Martin The Bat! v3.98.3 powered by Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6000 ConCarne cooks best since 1998 http://www.concarne.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current bet

Re: The Bat! 3.98.02

2007-03-02 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Simon! >> It's interesting that not many people seem to be affected by this Vista >> problem. > Are many people running Vista though? :) Hm, good point. ;-) > Not really Beta related, but how are you finding it with your apps and > hardware? I don't know if you have seen the BBC website art

Re: The Bat 3.98.2.2 on Vista

2007-03-03 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Maxim, well, it showed up that another person (JOhn C) is having the same problem, also just from time to time. See bug tracker. So it is an issue you should have a closer look at. Problem is that I cannot tell you anything more at the moment... :-/ BTW: No problems so far with 3.98.3. --

Re: 3.98.4

2007-03-05 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Maxim, up and running with OTFE and Vista. Default program also worked. :-) -- Regards, Martin The Bat! v3.98.4 powered by Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6000 ConCarne cooks best since 1998 http://www.concarne.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature _

Re: The Bat! hang at startup under Windows Vista

2007-03-16 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Maxim! > Can anybody confim that The Bat! hangs with 50% CPU utilization when > you run The Bat! under Windows Vista in 3.98.06? Yes: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6271 I personally did not try .6 on Vista yet. When having problems with the previous versions TB took over 90% CPU. --

Re: The Bat! hang at startup under Windows Vista

2007-03-16 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Maxim! >>> Yes: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6271 >>> I personally did not try .6 on Vista yet. When having problems with the >>> previous versions TB took over 90% CPU. > Your message is quite contradicting: by saying "Yes" you are asserting > that 3.98.06 hangs on Vista, and further

Re: 3.99.5

2007-05-10 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi all, up and running with OTFE... -- Regards, Martin The Bat! v3.99.5 powered by Windows 2003 5.2 Build 3790 Service Pack 2 ConCarne cooks best since 1998 http://www.concarne.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

IMAP folder list synchronization

2007-06-22 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi all, again I tried my luck with IMAP. I was very unlucky again. Just wanted to make sure that the problem isn't sitting in front of the computer... ;-) I created several folders on my test mailbox the last weeks using the webmail interface. Also there are several mails in the Inbox and the cre

Re: IMAP folder list synchronization

2007-06-22 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Stuart! >> Following three problems: >> 1) I created a filter which should move mails with a certain sender in a >> certain folder to a folder in another TB account. Nothing happened. The >> reason I like to do this: I want to store mails local because of the >> huge size and numbers, also I u

Re: IMAP folder list synchronization

2007-06-23 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Stuart! >> No, it was one of the folders that did not change since the time I setup >> the IMAP account. >> In "Manage IMAP folders" the synchronize checkbox of this folder was not >> checked. I changed this and tried again, also disconnected from the IMAP >> server and connected again. No luc

Re: IMAP folder list synchronization

2007-06-23 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Stuart! >>> Can you copy your filter and paste it here so we can test it? >> Sure. Here you are: > In general the filter seems to work OK. Two things you may want to try. > 1) Simplify the folder name. Maybe move it to a known folder as a test. > I'm not sure if an email address is a valid fol

Re: IMAP folder list synchronization

2007-06-27 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Stuart! >>> 1) Simplify the folder name. Maybe move it to a known folder as a test. >>> I'm not sure if an email address is a valid folder name for this >>> purpose. >> Well, it's not a folder name, the mail address is the name of the POP3 >> account the message should get moved to. > So you

Re: IMAP folder list synchronization

2007-07-16 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Vilius! >> So this is the traditional stuff we are talking about? IMAP is a feature >> but does not work. Great... > Welcome to the IMAPrevTB > I already moved to Outlook 2007 for better IMAP and the only feature I'm > missing now is messages thread view, which doesn't work well in Outlook. > B

Re: beta/17

2007-08-20 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Maxim, I'm missing most of my filters... three of four filters are gone... Are they gone for good? -- Regards, Martin The Bat! v3.99.17 (BETA) powered by Windows Server 2003 "R2" Standard Edition 5.2 Build 3790 Service Pack 2 ConCarne cooks best since 1998 http://www.concarne.org smime

Re: beta/17

2007-08-20 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Maxim, downgraded to 3.99.6, filters are back again and it looks like if all filters are back... Regards, Martin > Monday, August 20, 2007, 3:56:52 PM: > Hi Maxim, > I'm missing most of my filters... three of four filters are gone... > Are they gone for good? > Regards, > Martin smime.

Re: The Bat! 4.0

2007-10-12 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Vili! > Friday, October 12, 2007, 6:06:15 PM: >>> What's the situation? Any bètatesting for this version or... >> yes, it will be, You must wait, work in progress :-) > release date I'm more interested if features promised for v2 will be available for v4. Or if this is just another milk the

Re: The Bat! 4.0

2007-10-12 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Gleason! > Hasn't everyone seen this? Well maybe not, so here it is from the > Ritlabs website: > The largest-scale changes were made in The Bat!’s interface. > Users will see a totally new program. > [...] Sounds fancy and supports exactly what I wanted to say: A lot of cosmetic fixes and

Re: The Bat! 4.0

2007-10-13 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Paul! >> I don't get IMAP calls when they use other email clients. > Seems you have already found the answer to your problem. ...which comes back to the bottom line of my post which started this subthread: Ritlabs, please add long promised and paid state of the art features MOST mail client b

Re: The Bat! 4.0

2007-10-13 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Paul! >>> Seems you have already found the answer to your problem. >> Ritlabs, please add long promised and paid state of the art features >> MOST mail client big players offer smootly to your planned state of the >> art interface! > I am confused, you said, "please add...state of the art featu

Re: The Bat! 3.99.25

2007-10-20 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi all, I'm experiencing the problem that the field for the today's messages display time format is emptied every time I restart TheBat. Means I have to enter (for example) "t" every time I restart TheBat, otherwise default display format is used. Anybody else experiencing this problem? -- Reg

Re: 3.99.29

2007-11-25 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Maxim, I'm still having the same problem I had with version 3.99.25, see mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] from Oct/20/2007. I'm experiencing the problem that the field for the today's messages display time format is emptied every time I restart TheBat. Means I have to enter (for example) "t" every time I

Re: Visual / Remote Desktop / SMIME / WinServer2003

2005-04-26 Thread Martin Sebald
Hello, I also noticed some problems since i started again trying the actual beta versions. 1) Visual problem, see screenshot attached to this mail. TB shows folders like this when I click through the folders on the left side. 2) TB sometimes resizes from fullscreen to window mode when joining Re

Re: Visual / Remote Desktop / SMIME / WinServer2003

2005-04-26 Thread Martin Sebald
Hello! > 3) Valid S/MIME RootCA certificates are still showing up with a question > mark. If you look into the details, certificate is shown as valid, see > screenshot attached to this mail (I doubleclicked second certificate in > list). I also noticed this problem when checking certificates from

Re: The Bat! 3.0.9.20 Return is now available

2005-04-27 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi 9Val, seems you are not very interested in the stuff I posted. No comment, no fixes... No serious bugs or planned to fix in the release after the upcoming release? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Regards, Martin -- The Bat! v3.0.9.19 Return powered by Windows NT Clone 5.2 Build 379

Re: Visual / Remote Desktop / SMIME / WinServer2003

2005-04-27 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi all! >> 1) Visual problem, see screenshot attached to this mail. TB shows >> folders like this when I click through the folders on the left side. > Maybe I'm blind... whats the problem on that screenshot? Sorry maybe I didn't made myself clear. Take a look at the right side where you can see t

Re: The Bat! 3.0.9.20 Return is now available

2005-04-27 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Peter! >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > please add "mid:"; in front of the message-IDs, otherwise TB treats them > as a mailto: link. () Yeah sure, just forgot it this time. Sorry. Regards, Martin -- The Bat! v3.0.9.20 Return powered by Windows NT Clone 5.2 Build 3790 Servic

Re: The Bat! 3.0.9.20 Return is now available

2005-04-28 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi 9Val! >> seems you are not very interested in the stuff I posted. No comment, no >> fixes... > Nothing personal, there are a lot of bugs, most of them are > un-commented. I didn't take this personally but I wanted to be sure that at least someone noticed the bugs. See, it was / stil

Re: The Bat! 3.5 Return RC8 is now available

2005-05-12 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi, I noticed since Beta 5 or 6 that Connection Center is put in background when polling mails from one account and put into foreground (as it always was before) when polling mails from all accounts. Regards, Martin -- The Bat! v3.5 Return RC8 powered by Windows NT Clone 5.2 Build 3790 Service

Re: The Bat! 3.5 Return RC8 is now available

2005-05-12 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi all! >> I noticed since Beta 5 or 6 that Connection Center is put in background >> when polling mails from one account... > Nor here, as I have been able to confirm right now. Ah ok, I tested it once more. The Connection Center only opens in background when starting it by clicking on the down

...still not fixed in RC9...

2005-05-12 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi 9Val, still not fixed in RC9: Connection Center appearance: (noticed in RC5 or 6) Visual (folder bars) / Remote Desktop / SMIME / Windows Server 2003: (noticed in 3.0.9.19, S/MIME also in the first and early beta 3.x versions) Also I'm still wa

Re: ...still not fixed in RC9...

2005-05-17 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi 9Val! >> Yeah, 9Val, I know, just cosmetic stuff and nothing important. But I >> really think (like many others here in the beta list) that maybe old >> bugs should be fixed before adding cosmetic stuff like new icons. > It seems that I'm associated with all un-fixed bugs and as antagonist > o

Re: The Bat! 3.5 is now available

2005-05-17 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi all, great!! Another final version full of long known bugs! I can't wait until we have 4.0 Final, buggy as 3.5 Final but then with an upgrade fee. It's like Microsoft where I also do betatesting. You have a timetable and follow it, regardless of what should be done before releasing the software

Re: v3.5 status

2005-05-17 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi, take 5 people and you get 5 different opinions. What I was trying to say is that TB 3.5 Beta was not in no way ready for release. There are so many bugs still not fixed. @ Mary and Cees: AVs and stuff like that are showstoppers for me. I was talking about minor things plus things that simply

Re: v3.5 status

2005-05-17 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Mary, ah now we are talking about me. ;-) We should talk about TB, not about me. But I don't have a problem with that. See, I'm not experiencing a burn-out syndrome as betatester and I don't feel pain about the bugs I still see in the program. It's more like I'm considering myself useless becau

Re: No "On-The-Fly Pwd" installation ?

2005-05-18 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Martin, I'm experiencing the same problem. I just tried about the same: I installed TB Prof to a naked system, activated encryption with password and then restored a backup made from my "plain" installation. Restore worked but mail files are still stored plain. I also can say that the mail fil

Re: v3.5 status

2005-05-18 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Mary! > And I concur with your criticism of RitLabs development priorities, in > the main. But they are the ones with the business plan, and so they > implement it. You're absolutly right and I also know that it is like you're saying. Ritlabs is the boss here and we can stick with it (the beta

Re: v3.5 status

2005-05-18 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi MAU! >> ... newsreader functionality. > Have you tried MyGate? Simple, transparent... it works a treat. Not for > binaries though. I've used for... 2 years? Yeah I know MyGate but I did not try it yet. I'm using Mailtraq for about two years now and I'm satisfied. Nevertheless I would be more s

Re: No "On-The-Fly Pwd" installation ?

2005-05-18 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Martin! >> I'm experiencing the same problem. I just tried about the same: I >> installed TB Prof to a naked system, activated encryption with password >> and then restored a backup made from my "plain" installation. > I tried with a hacking method ;-) > [...] Great. Thanks, it also worked for

Re: No "On-The-Fly Pwd" installation ?

2005-05-19 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi all, after I also migrated to encryption I wanted to make sure that everybody knows that without the registry settings from before encryption (you are starting with a clean registry because of the whole uninstall/install process) there is much you have to setup again by hand. I solved this by s

Re: TheBat! 3.5 prof MSI - now zipped

2005-05-20 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Krzysztof! > or use the total commander MSI plugin to unpack msi file by himself :) I wasn't able to unpack the archive properly with the msi plugin for Total Commander. It shows all contents and it also shows the data.cab but inside data.cab I only see many files with strange additions to the

Re: 3.5.0.14

2005-05-25 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi all! > Please try the updated version from the download page AV over AV while clicking on "Reply", had to kill the task several times. Reverting to 3.5.0.11. Regards, Martin -- The Bat! v3.5.0.11 powered by Windows NT Clone 5.2 Build 3790 Service Pack 1 ConCarne cooks best since 1998 http

Missing folders in folder list!

2005-05-29 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi all, I just noticed that I'm missing one (or even more) folders. This could have happened when I transformed the message database from Plain to On-The-Fly Pwd or it could be also have something to do with a problem in the current beta version. Interesting is that I have 136 subfolders on the

Re: Missing folders in folder list!

2005-05-29 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Thomas! >> Interesting is that I have 136 subfolders on the hard disk in the folder >> of the account I'm talking about. But I only count 130 folders in the >> folder list inside TheBat. So where are the six missing folders? > Have you tried the secret handshake shift-crtl-alt-L yet? No, but I

Re: Missing folders in folder list!

2005-05-29 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi MAU! >> Interesting is that I have 136 subfolders on the hard disk in the folder >> of the account I'm talking about. But I only count 130 folders in the >> folder list inside TheBat. So where are the six missing folders? > Are you actually _missing_ one or more folders or is it just that the >

Re: Missing folders in folder list!

2005-05-29 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Liz! >> Should there happen something? No window popped up, nothing else >> happened. Also the subfolder I know for sure is gone did not appear in >> the folder it was before. > If nothing else you should get 0 folders found.. Make sure the folders > list is focused when you do it. I tried it

Re: Missing folders in folder list!

2005-05-29 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi MAU! >> Interesting is that I have 136 subfolders on the hard disk in the folder >> of the account I'm talking about. But I only count 130 folders in the >> folder list inside TheBat. So where are the six missing folders? > Are you actually _missing_ one or more folders or is it just that the >

Re: Missing folders in folder list!

2005-05-30 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi all, another update: I just tried to create the missing folders inside TB where they once existed. I got a error messages twice, see attached screenshot. I clicked on Cancel and did not try to create the folders. So the folders still exist somehow but are not shown in folder list. Also I'm sti

Re: Missing folders in folder list!

2005-05-30 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi all! > What is happening here? The unencrypted files in Inbox are to small to be > the correct files, Trash, Sent and Outbox cannot be empty because I see > many messages in these folders when I check inside TB. Plus this > msgs.dump file inside one folder. Another update: I checked folders wi

Re: Missing folders in folder list!

2005-05-30 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Liz! >> Hm, is this a bug of the program or the user? > only the source can answer that one :) Yeah you're right. I hope that someone from the source is reading this and I'm also hoping that this is not considered as a minor and cosmetic ;-) bug like other stuff I posted the last weeks which s

Re: Missing folders in folder list!

2005-05-30 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi MAU! >> How can I restore the two missing folders from my backup where >> everything still was saved in plain database files? > Sorry but I don't know. I have never used the built-in Backup and > Restore. No, I was talking about the Import/Export feature. I tried it couple of minutes ago and i

Re: Missing folders in folder list!

2005-05-30 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi MAU! >> another update: I just tried to create the missing folders inside TB >> where they once existed. I got a error messages twice, see attached >> screenshot. I clicked on Cancel and did not try to create the folders. > I'm not sure about this one, but it looks like that, whether you see it

Re: Missing folders in folder list!

2005-05-30 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Gleason! >> I tried it again and nothing happened. The folders list was focused when >> pressing Shift-Ctrl-Alt-l. >> Hm, is this a bug of the program or the user? > Should be L. I get a popup box that says, OK to reset list? > A shortcut to doing it in the IMAP folder manager, I suspect. > It

Re: Missing folders in folder list!

2005-05-30 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi all! > another update: I just tried to create the missing folders inside TB > where they once existed. I got a error messages twice, see attached > screenshot. I clicked on Cancel and did not try to create the folders. > So the folders still exist somehow but are not shown in folder list. Also

Re: 3.5.30

2005-06-19 Thread Martin Sebald
Hey Maxim, great work for now, thank you very much. I know, I can be a real pain in the *ss, but what about some bugs I mentioned weeks and months ago? Connection Center appearance: (noticed in 3.5 RC5 or 6) Visual (folder bars) / Remote Desktop / SMIME / Windows Server

Re: 3.5.30

2005-06-20 Thread Martin Sebald
list. I can send you the screenshots via private mail. (Folder bar issue is a better but not fully solved, status of the rest of the bugs is unchanged.) ===8<===This is a forwarded message From: Martin Sebald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, April 26, 2005, 12

Re: 3.5.30

2005-06-20 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Alex! >>> Hm, I don't keep the archive, could you please submit them to BT and >>> send me the links? >> Sure. Here are the mails. > Those are not exactly BT submissions (as requested), aren't they? Yeah ok. The one who's able to read has many advantages... ;-) Ok I'll post this a.s.a.p... :-

Re: 3.5.30

2005-06-20 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Maxim! > Hm, I don't keep the archive, could you please submit them to BT and send > me the links? Ok, here you are... finally... Open for 16 month now: Address book compression: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2333 Just opened: Window sizes and column widths on restart: https://www

Re: 3.5.30

2005-06-21 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Avi! >> Appearance of Connection Center: >> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4804 > I am puzzled by the fact that you would open this issue just now after > all of the "publicity" I have given to exactly the same issue for well > over a month. Why not just add a note to my own bt report,

Re: 3.5.30

2005-06-22 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi! Appearance of Connection Center: >> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4804 >> We've just fixed the above bugs. But one of the bugs was a duplicate. > Hallelujah! Just great. ;-) Thanks! Regards, Martin -- The Bat! v3.5.30 powered by Windows NT Clone 5.2 Build 3790 Service Pack 1

Re: 3.5.30

2005-06-23 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Alexander! >> Define 'painfully slow'. Over here it's 75 sec to find three messages >> among 12280 messages, that's kind of reasonable, I think. > I just opened my 24MB "messages.tbb" (5500 messages) in Total Commanders > viewer, and searched it for some nonsense text "askdjfaslkjdfaiu", which

Re: 3.5.30

2005-06-23 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Roelof! >> 5-10 minutes to search a folder withless than 2000 messages. That's > As a sidenote, when's the last time you optimized your HDD? I don't think it has anything to do with that. Read Alexanders note about searching a string with the Total Commander in the binary file. This takes less

Re: The Bat! 3.5.0.31 is now available

2005-06-24 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi 9Val! > [-] Other : Valid S/MIME RootCA certificates are showing up with a > question mark Confirm fix. Thanx! :-) > [-] Other : (#0004802) Windows Server 2003 is recognized as "Windows > NT Clone 5.2" by %WINDOWSPLATFORMNAME macro Confirm fix. Thanx! :-) > [-] O

Re: The Bat! 3.5.0.31 is now available

2005-06-24 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Michael! > I don't know why, but how do you have your PGP/GPG set up to use with > TB! ? > You are the only one that is automatically verified. Every time I get > a message from you, Martin, it has the little check mark GREEN on the > right hand side of the message header area. Right next to yo

Re: S/MIME: The issuer of this certificate chain was not found

2004-09-07 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi all, interesting, that no one from Ritlabs is interested in that. At least they are promoting the "new" version of TB with full S/MIME support... Regards, Martin -- The Bat! v3.0.0.7 powered by Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ConCarne cooks best since 1998 http://www.concarne.org

Mails in common folders are not marked as read automaticly (v2.12.00)

2004-09-07 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi all, a friend of mine is experiencing strange behavior in common folders. Mails are not marked as read automaticly when they are being read for x seconds. In "normal" folders it works perfectly and it also worked with common folders in version 2.10. Was there any change from 2.10 to 2.12 and h

Re: Mails in common folders are not marked as read automaticly (v2.12.00)

2004-09-08 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Allie! Once again thanks for your reply. I think you're right with your idea, the settings did not make the upgrade. Also it is interesting, that properties of common folders seem to be handled like properties of accounts. Well if you know it, it's ok but if you don't, you're lost. Also it is

  1   2   3   >