Hello Roelof!
On Tuesday, October 10, 2006, 6:12 AM, you wrote:
> Merely checking the listed recipient(s) prevents a lot of
> embarrassment, caused by self addressing folder templates or over
> enthusiastic autocompletes or in your case lacking encryption.
Understood. I concede defeat without in
Hello Roelof!
On Tuesday, October 10, 2006, 5:53 AM, you wrote:
MB>> ===
MB>> Warning - the TO address uses a different message template than the one
MB>> that was initially applied. Do you want to discard any changes in the
MB>> editor and apply the new template?
MB>> ==
Hello Ben!
On Monday, October 09, 2006, 6:46 PM, you wrote:
MB>> Thanks a mil for joining the discussion, Ben.
> Always a pleasure M'Queen Trill.
Your humble servant, Alpha Ben.
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.86.02 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
_
Hello Ben!
On Monday, October 09, 2006, 5:54 PM, you wrote:
> Personally having several accounts with slightly different templates
> for each one I have noticed this problem previously. If I have one
> account currently selected, and viewing from the mail ticker select a
> message, that
Hello Everyone!
Here are the steps to replicate the problem that I think will be
helped by having my feature wish implemented:
1) In your address book put a "nickname" for one of your entries.
2) To the "New Message" properties for that entry include in the
template the macro: %SIGNCOMPLETE.
3) S
Hello Alexander!
On Monday, October 09, 2006, 3:36 PM, you wrote:
>> No, no. Again, you've missed my point. All I have to do is not use the
>> To-field "handle" function. You do know what that is?
> Sure, I'm using it all the time.
Okay, then do you have someone you correspond with regularly, u
Hello Alexander!
On Monday, October 09, 2006, 12:57 PM, you wrote:
>> Alex, I thought I wrote clearly, but I guess I didn't:
>> I *did* write in the message body. The greeting is part of the message
>> body. I changed "Hello siss," to Hello Sue!"
> Ah. I have overlooked that detail. I see it no
Hello Alexander!
On Monday, October 09, 2006, 12:14 PM, you wrote:
>>> As long as I haven't made any changes to the message body, I can
>>> change the recipient, and the template will change with it. So I
>>> assume you had already begun typing the actual message, and then
>>> changed the recipie
Hello Goncalo!
On Sunday, October 08, 2006, 3:59 PM, you wrote:
> Well, in the past I was the only one (and one or another fellow) to
> have problems with the backup procedure that no one else had. It
> turned out to be a BUG nevertheless everybody still sent their nice
> pretty mail
Hello Alexander!
On Sunday, October 08, 2006, 3:47 PM, you wrote:
>> Can anyone confirm the behavior?
> As long as I haven't made any changes to the message body, I can change
> the recipient, and the template will change with it. So I assume you had
> already begun typing the actual message, an
Hello Paul!
On Sunday, October 08, 2006, 3:22 PM, you wrote:
MB>> If it's a feature, I do believe that it should be changed.
> If it were to change the template every time changes were made in the
> address it would also keep changing as you add addresses to the first
> one. Wouldn't that be a r
Hello Paul!
On Sunday, October 08, 2006, 2:22 PM, you wrote:
MB>> Can anyone confirm the behavior?
> I believe you should have deleted the message and started over since
> the template call is the first activity and changing the criteria
> after loading a template is not a valid move to change t
Hello Everyone!
As seen in my sig, I'm running beta 3.86.02.
I have a few correspondents whose templates include "Encrypt when
Completed."
I use the handle function--for instance, one of my Texas sisters is
"sis," and just typing that into the "To" field invokes her address
and the template for
Hello Richard!
On Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 11:48 AM, you wrote:
MB>> I've taken the liberty of amending the thread subject line above.
> Well done, I should have done that to let people know that I'd posted
> the wish.
I seldom remember to do it myself.
But, since I was in OT conversatio
Hello Richard!
On Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 10:56 AM, you wrote:
MB>> Maybe a more general complaint about *all* unresizeable dialogue boxes
MB>> would be in order.
> Done https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6032
Support note added.
Thanks a mil, Richard!
(I've taken the liberty of am
Hello Miguel!
On Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 9:48 AM, you wrote:
> I someone aside of you confirms this behaviour (i.e. no FILTER lines in
> log if Verbose is on) I'll log a bug report in BT.
I put Verbose on specifically to test for this.
Confirmed. No filter lines. My accounts are all POP3
Hello Thomas!
On Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 9:03 AM, you wrote:
MB No doubt I am truly the dizzy dame which my good friend Thomas
MB Fernandez regards me as.
>>> ;-)
MB>> "There is nothing like a dame," right?
> You mean like Dame Edna?
> http://www.dame-edna.com/
Ah, she does st
Hello Thomas!
On Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 8:16 AM, you wrote:
MB>> No doubt I am truly the dizzy dame which my good friend Thomas
MB>> Fernandez regards me as.
> ;-)
"There is nothing like a dame," right?
MB>> I didn't pay attention to what it said. Hit download, closed TB! after
MB>> th
Hello Miguel!
On Tuesday, September 12, 2006, 5:07 PM, you wrote:
> We use this saying to express that something is quite obvious. ([If it's]
> white and in a bottle, [it's] milk.)
> :)
Oh, my! Of course. Dumb me, I was thinking wine or shoe polish. :woe:
You've made me laugh out loud!
--
Be
Hello Richard!
On Tuesday, September 12, 2006, 3:43 PM, you wrote:
> Thank you very much for making me check the filter yet again. I did it 3
> times but the unsizeable dialogue boxes are ridiculously small when
> scrolling through. Time for another bug report methinks? ;-)
Indeed, I agree 100 p
Hello Miguel!
On Tuesday, September 12, 2006, 3:09 PM, you wrote:
>> I need you to tell me in plainer English the meaning of "white and in
>> a bottle."
> It comes from this puzzle: White and in a bottle, what is it? ;)
Ah, I get it now. I was trying to have it be more complicated than it
is!
Hello Miguel!
On Tuesday, September 12, 2006, 1:28 PM, you wrote:
>> No, I must have the simplest system of all! I have 39 filters, starting
>> with a filter for all unwanted mail that goes straight into the Trash
>> folder.
> H! I'm beginning to think that, like we say in Spain, "it is whit
Hello George!
On Tuesday, September 12, 2006, 6:45 AM, you wrote:
> Well, I leave the Bat! open all the time so it doesn't quite affect me.
> However it affects other people and should be fixed. And if the window with
> the update information was resizable it would be even better!
Amen to that!
Hello George!
On Tuesday, September 12, 2006, 3:50 AM, you wrote:
>> perhaps the bug is XP related. I notice that you are running on
>> the platform Win2000.
> Sorry, Mary, I cannot confirm either on Win XP. Check for updates works like
> expected here. After Help/Check for update I got the "No
Hello Bill!
On Monday, September 11, 2006, 10:57 PM, you wrote:
Please support:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6030
>>
Maybe we can get The Bat!'s hiccups stopped. :)
>>
>>> I can NOT confirm
>>
>> Hendrik, did you click on "Check for update" in the Help menu?
> Mary, alth
Hello Hendrik!
On Monday, September 11, 2006, 7:42 PM, you wrote:
>> Please support:
>> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6030
>> Maybe we can get The Bat!'s hiccups stopped. :)
> I can NOT confirm
Hendrik, did you click on "Check for update" in the Help menu?
And it did not offer you v.
Hello Raymund!
On Monday, September 11, 2006, 2:56 PM, you wrote:
>> I have The Bat! Pro but when I start up the program it asks me to
>> download 3.85/03 Home???
> Obviously it does. Well, maybe no one tested the update function with
> a Home as all TBBeta users are Professionals :-)
:)
Anywa
Hello Richard!
On Monday, September 11, 2006, 2:28 PM, you wrote:
MB>> Oh, great idea!
> Your reward for filing the report.
:bearhug:
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.85.03 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
Current beta is 3.85
Hello Cees!
On Monday, September 11, 2006, 2:02 PM, you wrote:
>>> Turned off up-date checking until I see something here that says
>>> v3.85.04 is ready for download.
MB>> Oh, great idea!
MB>> I'm going to do that, too. The whole thing caught me totally
MB>> off-guard, as I was focused on some
Hello Henk!
On Monday, September 11, 2006, 2:16 PM, you wrote:
> I have The Bat! Pro but when I start up the program it asks me to
> download 3.85/03 Home???
Please support: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6030
Thanks a mil in advance, Henk.
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.85.03 on Win
Hello Peter!
On Monday, September 11, 2006, 2:13 PM, you wrote:
> But of course, this behavior is not correct. That's why Mary's report
> was necessary. https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6030
Thanks a mil for repeating the link, Peter!
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.85.03 on Windows XP 5
Hello Bill!
On Monday, September 11, 2006, 1:56 PM, you wrote:
> Also, I'm getting this download offering:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/thebat_home_3-85-03.msi
> Which is could be destructive - I have the "pro" version
> installed.
No worries.
No doubt I am truly the dizzy dame w
Hello Richard!
On Monday, September 11, 2006, 1:44 PM, you wrote:
MB>> Please support:
MB>> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6030
> Entered support.
> Turned off up-date checking until I see something here that says
> v3.85.04 is ready for download.
Oh, great idea!
I'm going to do th
Hello Thomas!
On Monday, September 11, 2006, 1:04 PM, you wrote:
> That's because you're on the newsletter mailing list. I'm on that same
> list and receive the same newsletters. The letter also showed the URL
> for the Pro version. If you have already downloaded it, why would you
> donwload it a
Hello Richard Newman and Everyone on TBBETA and TBUDL!
Please support:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6030
Maybe we can get The Bat!'s hiccups stopped. :)
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.85.03 Pro (no OTFE) on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
___
Hello Richard!
On Monday, September 11, 2006, 1:02 PM, you wrote:
> You are so much better at that then I, I'll let you enter and I'll
> re-affirm when entered.
Flattery will get you somewhere, at least with me!
> When you installed Home did the download message stop or did it tell
> you there
Hello Richard!
On Monday, September 11, 2006, 1:00 PM, you wrote:
PM>> This is the automatic reminder of updates that RITlabs send to each
PM>> registered user. They cannot (and should not) know, who already
PM>> updated.
> There is no logic to that Peter. If Help tells me I have 3.85.03
> instal
Hello Peter!
On Monday, September 11, 2006, 12:48 PM, you wrote:
RN>> I've have TB Pro v3.85.03 installed from the MSI for a few days now.
RN>> Today, I started to get a seemingly redundant message telling me
RN>> that home_3-85-03.msi was available for download.
RN>> It doesn't seem lik
Hello Richard!
On Monday, September 11, 2006, 12:25 PM, you wrote:
> ... I've have TB Pro v3.85.03 installed from the MSI for a few days now.
> Today, I started to get a seemingly redundant message telling me
> that home_3-85-03.msi was available for download.
I received it, too.
Foolishl
Hello Ian!
On Monday, September 11, 2006, 1:57 AM, you wrote:
> Maybe there should be no option but simply the logo does not try and
> stay on top at all?
Good thinking! Why would anyone want it there? I configured mine not
to do that.
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.85.03 on Windows XP 5.1 26
Hello Miguel!
On Sunday, September 10, 2006, 5:36 AM, you wrote:
> Please see:
> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6028
> and add a supporting note if you think it would useful to you.
Done.
It would indeed be useful to me.
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.85.03 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Se
Hello Richard!
On Friday, September 08, 2006, 12:54 PM, you wrote:
PM>> I think it is worthwhile to bring to the developers' attention.
> Done. https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6022
I'm so glad you did that, Richard. I've added a supporting note.
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.85.03 on
Hello Alexander!
On Tuesday, September 05, 2006, 1:03 PM, you wrote:
> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6009
Much appreciated.
I've just added a confirming, supporting note there.
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.85.02 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
_
Hello Bill!
On Tuesday, September 05, 2006, 12:34 PM, you wrote:
> I received that change-log window, without a scroll bar,
> when I opened TB this morning. I couldn't close it but I
> could close TB from right clicking the TB icon in the tray
> and picking Exit.
I didn't think to try the tray
Hello Stuart!
On Tuesday, September 05, 2006, 11:09 AM, you wrote:
>> When I returned and clicked on my TB! icon to launch TB!, my
>> notification function kicked in
> OIC.
I want to know at launch. And I want control of whether I download the
latest offering or not.
> Don't let mine do that.
Hello Marck!
On Tuesday, September 05, 2006, 10:58 AM, you wrote:
> @5-Sep-2006, 17:50 +0200 (05-Sep 16:50 here) Alexander S. Kunz [ASK]
> in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Mary:
>>> So, a wish: Could we have a scrollbar when there is a very long
>>> change-log for the new version being offered?
Hello Alexander!
On Tuesday, September 05, 2006, 10:50 AM, you wrote:
>> So, a wish: Could we have a scrollbar when there is a very long
>> change-log for the new version being offered?
> Not just a scrollbar, but a resizable window, preferably.
Oh, yes, Alex! You're one of the best thinkers in
Hello Stuart!
On Tuesday, September 05, 2006, 10:53 AM, you wrote:
>> So, a wish: Could we have a scrollbar when there is a very long
>> change-log for the new version being offered?
> I've got a scrollbar, wanna borrow mine?
> http://www.yuangchi.com/offtopic/ss1.gif
Well, but Stuart! That's t
Hello Marek!
On Tuesday, September 05, 2006, 10:42 AM, you wrote:
Tt>>> Check for new version (now work ok)
>> It works but why oh why is the info box so stupidly small and not
>> resizeable? :-(
> there are additional changes for Updates feature planned, probably in next
> beta cycle already.
Hello Toni!
On Tuesday, September 05, 2006, 10:39 AM, you wrote:
TF>> Do you have a changelog?
> Sorry, i don't... the log available is a very large log whit changes
> since 3.80.06.
As noted in my earlier message to you, the change-log appears when the
notify-at-launch function kicks in.
Coul
Hello Toni!
On Tuesday, September 05, 2006, 10:17 AM, you wrote:
> Version 3.85.02 is available.
> Check for new version (now work ok) or
> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_pro_3-85-02.msi
I did this download from the "check for update at launch" dialogue.
A very long
Hello Martin!
On Tuesday, September 05, 2006, 9:50 AM, you wrote:
> Made two fixes
> http://home.tiscali.ch/mynewsgroup/version.xml
Thanks a million! :thumbup:
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.85.02 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
___
Hello Stuart!
On Tuesday, September 05, 2006, 9:31 AM, you wrote:
>> I clicked Finish after the install. Just as with all installs.
> I think you misunderstand.
> I've done this a few times 'cos I'm heavy-handed. If you double-click
> the installer in windows explorer (or rather double-double-cl
Hello Uwe!
On Tuesday, September 05, 2006, 9:36 AM, you wrote:
>>> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/version.xml
>> Don't know. How do you mean "check it with your browser"?
> Just open it with Firefox or Internet Explorer and look at the error
> message.
Ah. Okay. My browser is Opera 9.
I t
Hello Maggie!
On Tuesday, September 05, 2006, 9:32 AM, you wrote:
M>> 1) Help/Check for new updates did not function in going from v.
M>> 3.81.18 to v. 3.85.01; so might also be dysfunctional in v. 3.85.01
> The help function is working here.
Well, as Marek confirmed, they just hadn't set up th
Hello Stuart!
On Tuesday, September 05, 2006, 9:32 AM, you wrote:
>> Well, it may be local to me. Let's see how my next TB! msi install
>> goes, whenever that occurs.
> As a test you could just try installing the currnt version over the
> top of itself.
Well, no need to test now.
I went out to
Hello Marek!
On Tuesday, September 05, 2006, 9:08 AM, you wrote:
>> I cannot confirm on this, everything was fine for me.
> no problem here too.
Thanks, Marek.
Well, it may be local to me. Let's see how my next TB! msi install
goes, whenever that occurs.
Meanwhile, I'm a happy camper.
V. 3.8
Hello Stuart!
On Tuesday, September 05, 2006, 9:08 AM, you wrote:
>> 2) When I did the msi install of v. 3.85.01, and clicked "Finish," I
>> was sent back to the beginning of the Installer.
> Are you sure you didn't launch the installer twice? Clicking 'Finish'
> in the first would have dismissed
Hello Uwe!
On Tuesday, September 05, 2006, 8:56 AM, you wrote:
>> 1) Help/Check for new updates did not function in going from v.
>> 3.81.18 to v. 3.85.01; so might also be dysfunctional in v. 3.85.01
>> but no way so far to test that.
> Am I correct, that TB! is calling
> http://www.ritlabs.com
Hello NetVicious!
On Tuesday, September 05, 2006, 8:09 AM, you wrote:
>> I love them, anyway. But it is annoying.
> Easy. They have one date for the release.
I know. With RC2 in hand, I should have been watching the download
page at www.ritlabs.com .
Sorry I got so passionate about it. Actuall
Hello Mark!
On Tuesday, September 05, 2006, 3:34 AM, you wrote:
MB>> Nobody in his right mind will be running .18 or any of these old
MB>> betas any more.
> But then again, some of us were born with a left mind. And those who were
> born without, but have some mind left also have a left mind!
>
Hello Thomas!
On Monday, September 04, 2006, 9:24 PM, you wrote:
>>> Hitting Help / Check for updates shows only 3.81.17 and 3.81.18.
MB>> But the release is on the download page at the Ritlabs website.
> That's why the Check updates should show it.
MB>> Been some speculation that the Update c
Hello Thomas!
On Monday, September 04, 2006, 8:44 PM, you wrote:
> Hitting Help / Check for updates shows only 3.81.17 and 3.81.18.
But the release is on the download page at the Ritlabs website.
Been some speculation that the Update connection from Help was not
enabled, to forestall the server
Hello Maggie!
On Sunday, September 03, 2006, 9:31 AM, you wrote:
>>> Hope it works for Maggie. :-)
M>> Me too. I may have to send her a PM screenshot to show where the
M>> right-click should be done, if we don't hear from her on the list in a
M>> little bit.
> :running: Here I am! Got it!
Yay!
Hello Stuart!
On Sunday, September 03, 2006, 8:35 AM, you wrote:
MB>> I have both Standard and Formatting ticked in that menu. However, I
MB>> don't remember ever ticking them. Could they have arrived that way by
MB>> Default?
> I think they probably do.
MB>> I think you've put your finger on t
Hello Stuart!
On Sunday, September 03, 2006, 8:16 AM, you wrote:
MM>> In my editor window there is no special 'toolbar' with the insert
MM>>smiley button . ...
> If you are using microedit, try right clicking on the blank space
> beside the menu bar. I get a choice of 2 things Standard and
Hello NetVicious!
On Saturday, September 02, 2006, 9:33 AM, you wrote:
>> 2) One glaringly obvious--but yet trivial--problem remains: A mouseover
>> does not display the handle of individual images. ...
> Confirmed. TB only shows the hint of the selected image. Click the
> image you would know t
Hello Charlene!
On Friday, September 01, 2006, 4:07 PM, you wrote:
> Confirmed as resolved, good work, 9Val!
Concur.
> I closed the corresponding bugtrack issue.
I opened a new one. ;)
See: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6000
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.81.18 RC2 on Windows XP 5
Hello Everyone!
Here's the link:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6000
Here's what I wrote:
Copy-and-Paste
==
0006000: "Insert Smile" dialogue box: A mouseover of images either
does not display handle texts, or displays wrong text.
Description 1) The dialogue box is very smal
Hello 9Val!
:chisinau:
On Friday, September 01, 2006, 3:30 PM, you wrote:
> The Bat! 3.81.18 RC2 is now available from:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
> Here is a short list of changes:
> [-] AV on inserting smiley
:)
1) No AV with this now, and no AV bringing up the dialogue box, or usin
Hello Richard!
On Thursday, August 31, 2006, 2:40 PM, you wrote:
MB>> I hope you and Leif can get the anomaly figured out. There's always a
MB>> reason.
> Yes, it's funny that only he and I have that problem, particularly when
> other Opera users don't. Like Leif, the link works fine when copied
Hello Richard!
On Thursday, August 31, 2006, 2:19 PM, you wrote:
MB>> Perhaps the version number is the difference?
> Unfortunately not because Daniel is running the same version of Opera as
> me. I have block unwanted pop ups set and no sound allowed. Apart from
> that it's bog standard.
I hop
Hello Simon!
On Thursday, August 31, 2006, 2:13 PM, you wrote:
MB>> Here's a c&p of the note I just entered at Bug Tracker,
MB>> in re http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5956
> I agree and have added to your BT
Thanks a million, Simon. You have been so faithful to test this with
every new be
Hello Everyone!
Here's a c&p of the note I just entered at Bug Tracker, in re
http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5956
==Begin C&P==
Since we are now at RC1 in the current beta series, I thought maybe
the development team might agree with me that it's time to assign this
bug and get it
Hello Mark!
On Thursday, August 31, 2006, 1:15 PM, you wrote:
MB>> Totally, completely, and emphatically agree!!
> I had expected a little bit more enthousiasm! :-)
I'm going to add another note to the BT issue report on this. After
all, if we're at RC1, the time is short until the RitLabs fo
Hello Richard!
On Thursday, August 31, 2006, 11:17 AM, you wrote:
DŁ>> not confirmed - Opera 9.01
> Now that is strange because I get it every time with build 8552 (the
> latest)
No problem with Opera beta 9.1.8518.0.
Perhaps the version number is the difference? (Dierk gave me the link
to it
Hello Leif!
On Thursday, August 31, 2006, 10:35 AM, you wrote:
> http://xn--ovg.com/watermark
> If you open the above URL in a browser (at least FF and IE) directly,
> it works fine. However, if you click on it from an e-mail from within
> TB, I always get an invalid URL error in the browser (FF
Hello Mark!
On Thursday, August 31, 2006, 9:33 AM, you wrote:
S>> Just to flag that browsing smilies to insert in a non-plain text mail
S>> still causes a serious AV if you have PCW Smilies installed.
> The problem occurs in plain text mail (written with MicroEd) as well...
Confirmed.
S>> The
Hello Simon!
On Wednesday, August 30, 2006, 12:53 PM, you wrote:
9>> The Bat! 3.81.17 RC1 is now available from:
9>> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
> Just to flag that browsing smilies to insert in a non-plain text
> mail still causes a serious AV if you have PCW Smilies installed.
> The AV
Hello Ron!
On Wednesday, August 30, 2006, 12:09 PM, you wrote:
> The problem with the "broken header" was that my WinRar program was
> outdated.
Thanks for reporting. May help the next person who has a similar
problem.
> Unfortunately, even though I successfully unpacked the beta, I still
Hello 9Val!
On Wednesday, August 30, 2006, 11:31 AM, you wrote:
> [-] Help file missing in 3.81.16
Confirm fixed. Thanks a mil. :)
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.81.17 RC1 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
Current beta is 3.
Hello Peter!
On Tuesday, August 29, 2006, 1:55 PM, you wrote:
> It works OK in 3.81.14, but not in 3.81.16. So the developers seem to
> have kicked this out inadvertently while fixing another bug... ;-)
> It is certainly worth a BT entry.
Maxim has just now thanked Ian in a TBBETA post and prom
Hello Matt!
On Tuesday, August 29, 2006, 12:43 PM, you wrote:
> And to add another wrinkle...'help:help topics' doesn't work here.
> Pressing F1 brings up an error box that says "Missing context help topic
> 14028".
Maybe I'd better go ahead and write a BT note, even though Ian is the
one who fi
Hello Maggie!
On Tuesday, August 29, 2006, 9:47 AM, you wrote:
D>> I get help with F1, but not with 'help:help topics' pull down
> I used menu Help|Help Topics when I checked, but F1 works here, too.
Good, Maggie. Thanks for the clarifying detail. Since you're running
.12, this nails the menu
Hello Maggie!
On Tuesday, August 29, 2006, 9:26 AM, you wrote:
M>> And I don't know for how many betas this has been
M>> going on. Can't remember when I last tried to use Help.
> Working fine here.
Thanks Maggie. You're running .12, so it's quite recent.
Definitely not working in .16.
--
Bes
Hello Ian!
On Tuesday, August 29, 2006, 8:20 AM, you wrote:
> I had need to look up The Bat! help but I get nothing happening. I
> have not made any changes to the system.
Confirmed here. Clicking on the menu Help/Help Topics brings up
nothing. If you decide to put a BT note, I will write a supp
Hello Ron!
On Monday, August 28, 2006, 1:58 PM, you wrote:
> I understand what you are saying but I can't even get to the point of
> trying copy the new .exe file over my old .exe file. The new .exe will
> NOT extract, much less over-write!!
I'm only an amateur--but WinRar for me extracts *whil
Hello Ron!
On Monday, August 28, 2006, 1:40 PM, you wrote:
> Added the sig del and the version. Which is pretty darn old, as you
> can tell!!
Ah. Version 2.12. I'm not sure these rar versions will fit with 2.x. I
think you'll have to have v. 3.x, preferably the last full release, v.
3.80.06--
Hello Ron!
On Monday, August 28, 2006, 1:17 PM, you wrote:
> The problem is that I can NOT extract the downloaded file. I have
> downloaded THREE DIFFERENT beta versions and I get the same error each
> time. I've tried using Opera and IE and receive the same error. I've
> tried using the
Hello Marek!
On Thursday, August 24, 2006, 3:32 PM, you wrote:
> Go to scheduller, create new task and add action "Check for update", where
> select "notification only". Close this task and in select "Execute task
> now" in context menu select. Now You will see what I expect, if will be
> "notifi
Hello Marek!
On Thursday, August 24, 2006, 3:08 PM, you wrote:
> maybe I am not only, who wants to have this dialog resizable and
> with Esc key enabled.
I would support this wish.
As I just wrote to you, I didn't even see that dialogue. Maybe because
I'm using Windows large fonts (120 dpi)?
O
Hello 9Val!
On Thursday, August 24, 2006, 2:43 PM, you wrote:
> The Bat! 3.81.16 Beta is now available from:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
Up and running here, also, with no problems so far.
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.81.16 Beta (Pro, no OTFE, two POP3 accounts)
on Windows XP 5.1 26
Hello Marek!
On Thursday, August 24, 2006, 3:10 PM, you wrote:
> as I discovered, when I try to check update manually, TB allways displays
> dialog "Select update version", even I have selected "notification only"
> mode and not "Interactive" mode.
Marek, perhaps I overlooked that? I have select
Hi Everyone--
Jürgen Haug posted this on TBOT and I offered to Forward it for him,
since his message to TBBETA has bounced twice.
This is a forwarded message
From: Jurgen Haug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: TBOT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, August 22, 2006, 12:27:31 PM
Subject: off topic question
Hello Alexander!
On Saturday, August 19, 2006, 11:37 AM, you wrote:
>>> And for the poor souls that can't access the beta site
>> ...and the "check for updates" function as well...
>> :)
> I keep forgetting this, because I don't like built-in update (check)
> functions in general.
I have mine
marys (c-69-180-203-215.hsd1.tn.comcast.net[69.180.203.215])
by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP
id <2006081916503101300np90te>; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:50:31 +
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 11:50:32 -0500
From: Mary Bull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <
Hello Simon!
On Friday, August 18, 2006, 5:44 PM, you wrote:
MB>> In other aspects--except for the "Smile" button dialogue
MB>> problems noted as still not fixed by Simon (but the
MB>> change log doesn't say it is; simply keeping this
MB>> bug-or-bugs to the forefront by mentioning it)--The Bat!
Hello 9Val!
On Friday, August 18, 2006, 4:11 PM, you wrote:
> [-] problem with Folder Properties dialog on large fonts
Looking good here now, with Windows XP large fonts setting.
Thanks a mil!
In other aspects--except for the "Smile" button dialogue problems
noted as still not fixed by Simon (
Hello Simon!
On Friday, August 18, 2006, 4:45 PM, you wrote:
9>> The Bat! 3.81.15 Beta ...
> The AV when scrolling smilies is still present; see attached. It
> appears to have changed reference and is now persistent and will not
> acknowledge and close once the Av happens.
Confirmed in all res
Hello Peter!
On Friday, August 11, 2006, 7:34 PM, you wrote:
ASK>>> Who files a wish? :-)
PN>> Since I'm new at this, I too will be glad to support it if one of you
PN>> old hands wants to create it.
> See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5969
> Add your corrections, comment, support
1 - 100 of 1991 matches
Mail list logo