Re: Filter
Hello Gunivortus, Thursday, March 14, 2013, 5:52:22 PM, you wrote: GG I'd like to have a mental filter on incoming mail that could filter mail that GG has to be answered into the folder 'to be answered'. GG ;-) I have one, but it is not automatic. It works as follows: Any mail that needs to be answered is hit by enter (hence opened in a new window, officially called Folder View) and gets a flag (crtl-G) when I check mails in the morning. This makes sense, because most mails I receive are just for my attention (by CC). The privilege of being the boss is to copied in on so many operational mails that I hardly take a glance at, so I need to prioritize. When I have seen all incoming mails and have a number of open windows in my TB, I start replying to the open ones one-by-one, and a reply filter takes the flag off. By the end of the business day, there should be no more open windows, and no flagged messages. However, we sometimes have blackouts, and that's where the flags come in (after power is restored): I go to a virtual folder which lists all the flagged messages, and I now which ones still to answer. -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 5.3.8 under Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 5.3.8.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter
Hello Thomas, GG I'd like to have a mental filter on incoming mail that could filter mail that GG has to be answered into the folder 'to be answered'. GG ;-) I have one, but it is not automatic. It works as follows: Mine is somewhat similar but without opening any windows. I use Smartspace to browse my received messages and to mark them as read. When this happens, a set of Read filters I have move the message to its appropriate archive folder. EXCEPT if the message just read was previously flagged (manually), in which case a different Read filter moves it to my 'For reply' folder and removes the flag. When I do reply to one of the messages in the 'For reply' folder, a set of Replied filters, with similar conditions and actions to the Read filters, move the just replied message to the appropriate archive folder. Added to this I have a [Must reply] virtual folder just underneath 'For reply', and which only looks into this folder and displays the messages that are older than X days (I change the value of X every now and then). -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v5.3.8.4 (BETA) on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3 My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com Current beta is 5.3.8.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter Problem?
Roelof, Thursday, February 7, 2013, 10:49:30 AM, you wrote: RO Hallo Steven, RO On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 07:59:19 -0500GMT (7-2-2013, 13:59 , where I RO live), you wrote: SPV What happens first: Filtering or Junk Checking? RO Junk checking happens first. Cannot be altered. Thanks, that's what I needed to know. Maybe my suggestion for allowing the user to choose where in the filtering sequence junk (and virus) checking occurs will be considered... RO However, what you can do, is make your spam filter add a header (or RO add something to the subject), but not drop it to the junk folder. RO And configure the sorting office to move everything with that spam RO header to your junk folder. RO You should place that spam filter in your sorting in such a way that RO addresses with lots of false positives get filtered before your spam RO filter gets activated. RO Unfortunately I don't know for sure whether this is possibe with your RO Regula plug-in. I just checked the config and there's no option for header modification. BUT it does have its own filter rules where I could mark specific header values (just like TB!'s filters) as always being SPAM or HAM. BUT... Today it was all of the new messages from this group (TBBETA) that landed in the Junk mail folder. Even the one I posted. Something is definitely wrong. TBBETA messages have been filtered correctly for *YEARS* with virtually zero false positives for junk. It is almost infinitely unlikely that ALL of the messages from yesterday would be considered junk. All of my other filters (including TBUSER) are still working correctly today. I'm thinking that my question actually belongs in the Incoming message filtering stopped working?? thread, because I believe that's what I've been experiencing. -- Steven Vallière | tb 5.3.6.2 (BETA) | mailto:the...@e-visions.com -- If you didn't write it down, then it didn't happen. -Larry Zana Current beta is 5.3.6.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter Problem?
Friday, February 8, 2013, 8:13:46 AM, I wrote: SPV Today it was all of the new messages from this group (TBBETA) SPV that landed in the Junk mail folder. Even the one I posted. SPV Something is definitely wrong. TBBETA messages have been SPV filtered correctly for *YEARS* with virtually zero false SPV positives for junk. It is almost infinitely unlikely that SPV ALL of the messages from yesterday would be considered junk. SPV All of my other filters (including TBUSER) are still working SPV correctly today. I'm thinking that my question actually SPV belongs in the Incoming message filtering stopped working?? SPV thread, because I believe that's what I've been experiencing. I should note that this behavior is what I saw during the first few minutes after booting this morning. After I sent this message, I rebooted my computer again to see what happened and now the TBBETA message are being filtered correctly again. I didn't run anything differently either time. TheBat! is the first (and only) program automatically started when I log in. So it seems that TheBat! is now doing different things for me each time my machine is booted. -- Steven Vallière | tb 5.3.6.2 (BETA) | mailto:the...@e-visions.com -- If you didn't write it down, then it didn't happen. -Larry Zana Current beta is 5.3.6.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter Problem?
Hallo Steven, On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 07:59:19 -0500GMT (7-2-2013, 13:59 , where I live), you wrote: SPV What happens first: Filtering or Junk Checking? Junk checking happens first. Cannot be altered. However, what you can do, is make your spam filter add a header (or add something to the subject), but not drop it to the junk folder. And configure the sorting office to move everything with that spam header to your junk folder. You should place that spam filter in your sorting in such a way that addresses with lots of false positives get filtered before your spam filter gets activated. Unfortunately I don't know for sure whether this is possibe with your Regula plug-in. -- Groetjes, Roelof Moderator: Satan in some cases. http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 5.3.6.2 (BETA) Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1 5 pop3 accounts, 2 imap accounts OTFE disabled i7-2600 3.4GHz 4 GB RAM Current beta is 5.3.6.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter stopped working overnight. Any ideas?
Hello F.P., Monday, November 14, 2011, 2:15:59 PM, you wrote: i answer to myself. Seting up a hole new installation onto a second Win-7-64 installation. Also on this my filters doesent work anymore (only manual). There are problems with the filters process. Jerry -- Ethan J Mings President, The Desk Consulting Group Inc Oakville, Ontario Canada. L6L 3B7 Write to me at: qualityoff...@consultant.com Skype me at : ejmings Current beta is 5.0.26.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter stopped working overnight. Any ideas?
Hi Jerry i answer to myself. Seting up a hole new installation onto a second Win-7-64 installation. Also on this my filters doesent work anymore (only manual). There are problems with the filters process. means? Bug is open or so? Thx fpr Info F.P. Current beta is 5.0.26.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter stopped working overnight. Any ideas?
Hi, anyone's guess is a buffer/logproblem, but i dont now where. Some buffer is up to a count of 65xxx (something) and now its over. I have no idea how to check these. i answer to myself. Seting up a hole new installation onto a second Win-7-64 installation. Also on this my filters doesent work anymore (only manual). F.P. Current beta is 5.0.26.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter stopped working overnight. Any ideas?
Hi F.P., im not sure whats going on. Shutdown my computer 2 days befor and bootetd it yesterday. Since that time my filters stoped working. Everything looks finde, no changes - filters checked many times. But i cant get it back to work (TB 5.0.26.10) Any ideas how to check whats going on? And yes, for sure, i did not change anything. No idea why it stopped but try to uncheck and check again Watched folders. I have the issue that all VF are always equal to 0 after TBK file is imported while importing TBK. Unchecking and checking of Watched Folder List for each filter separately helps but is annoying -- Best Regards, RS (FEDARA) The Bat! 4.2.44.2 Windows 7 x64 Professional (7601 Service Pack 1) Sunday, November 13, 2011 (16:26 ; GMT+8) Current beta is 5.0.26.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter stopped working overnight. Any ideas?
Hi, No idea why it stopped but try to uncheck and check again Watched folders. did not help. Dont understand that. Manual filtering still works, but automaticly is over. F.P. Current beta is 5.0.26.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter stopped working overnight. Any ideas?
Hello F.P., hello List! * F.P. wrote '[1]: did not help. Dont understand that. Manual filtering still works, but automaticly is over. I have the same - unsolved - problem with the task manager, which should filter flagged messages to another folder. It doesn't work automatically. Manual filtering works perfect with the selected filter and flagged messages. -- Regards, Christoph TheBat! v5.0.26.10 (ALPHA) unter Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1 64bit [1] ~ Nachricht vom: 13.11.2011 @ 17:22:08 +0100 GMT mid:CAOSk9fvj9TMaCi3jsKU_A5jeLJq73JZE-=jegsu6eesxwzx...@mail.gmail.com Current beta is 5.0.26.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter stopped working overnight. Any ideas?
Hi, Am 13. November 2011 07:20 schrieb F.P. ferdi.p...@googlemail.com: Hi, Shutdown my computer 2 days befor and bootetd it yesterday. Since that time my filters stoped working. Everything looks finde, no changes - filters checked many times. But i cant get it back to work (TB 5.0.26.10) once again is it only onto my IMAP Account. POP-Filtersting still works automaticly. anyone's guess is a buffer/logproblem, but i dont now where. Some buffer is up to a count of 65xxx (something) and now its over. I have no idea how to check these. F.P. Current beta is 5.0.26.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter mark read not always working
Title: Re: Filter mark read not always working
Hello Luca,
Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 2:50:34 PM, you wrote:
After v.5, this filter of mine
started failing sometime:
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID:
[4ED70948.01CBBF15.0D7D68EA.0CE43897]
Name: Dimeadozen
Filter:
{\0D\0A\20`0`0`dimeadozen.org\0D\0A}
MarkRead
MoveMessage folder
\5C\5cmbox543...@linuxfan.it\5CDimeadozen
IsActive
Ignore
endFilter
This is the only filter in its
account, and the "mark read" action sometime
fails: some messages stay unread. I
can't figure out any rule for this to
happen, all messages get moved
properly to the selected folder and most of
them are marked read as expected,
except some (approximately, I'd say one
every five-ten messages).
I have similar problem, all income messages I move to trash should be "read" but its not working anytime.
Filter is simply: any message mark as read, apply in folder "trash"
--
Best regards,
Michał mailto:michal.lewin...@is-kwadrat.pl
Current beta is 5.0.9.5 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter stopped working
I had a filter all of a sudden stop working. Confirmed here. under imap/exchange all filters work randomly - some works at time, other don't. For now I can't see any regularity in filter's behavior I've noticed following regularity. Let's suppose I received 5 messages - only the first (the oldest) message is filtered, but when I manually start operation of re-filtering, the next one is filtered - again the oldest from received, and so on - after 4 actions of re-filtering, all new messages are filtered and sorted into proper subfolders. -- Pozdrowienia, Krzysztof Kudłacik Current beta is 5.0.6.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter stopped working
Hi, 2011/4/6 Rick rick.grunwald.groupm...@gmail.com: I had a filter all of a sudden stop working. I have deleted it and recreated it and it still won't work. There are many other filters in this account that are still working correctly I am asking on the beta list because it stopped working in 5.05 My point of view is that TB did not get that filtering to work as expected. Thats no FUD or anything else but i dont understand these problems in IMAP. If i see that source from our filters i dont understand why that does not work continuously. My knoledge are only shell-scripting, means that im not a proffesional dev.. Forgett about optical tuning or html messages - get your IMAP Client to work and give them a working filtering and you get many customers. These stepchild IMAP is a heavy and usefull protocol with a huge amount of users. They need a proffesional tool - and not tool that stumble over filters. I know that these messages want help, i hope nobody will laugh about that - or my great english ;) - but i have a slight hope that these filtering subprogramm is not so complicated. Pls stop for a while to make TB look shiny or get a nice new folderimage or a new startimage. Nobody need that urgent. Regards Current beta is 5.0.6.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter stopped working
I had a filter all of a sudden stop working.
On pop3 account filter listed below stopped working - it sorts incoming
messages, but don't mark them as 'read':
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [4E9FC215.01C8D6AA.1C54605A.66288BC4]
Name: css
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`5`0`cs...@lists.css-discuss.org\0D\0A}
MoveMessage folder \5C\5Conet\5CInbox\5Ccss
MarkRead
IsActive
Ignore
endFilter
--
Pozdrowienia,
Krzysztof Kudłacik
Current beta is 5.0.6.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter stopped working
I had a filter all of a sudden stop working. Confirmed here. under imap/exchange all filters work randomly - some works at time, other don't. For now I can't see any regularity in filter's behavior -- Pozdrowienia, Krzysztof Kudłacik Current beta is 5.0.6.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter stopped working
Hello Krzysztof, Thursday, April 7, 2011, 12:57:34 PM, you wrote: I had a filter all of a sudden stop working. Confirmed here. under imap/exchange all filters work randomly - some works at time, other don't. For now I can't see any regularity in filter's behavior Do you get an exception like this? ClassName: Exception Message: Sizes differ!! IsOSException: 0 Modules: because this is killing filtering for me. It's definitely a specific message which I am trying to hunt down. -- Best regards, Tonymailto:t...@parkinch.co.uk The Bat! 5.0.8 Current beta is 5.0.6.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter stopped working
Hello Rick, Wednesday, April 6, 2011, 12:02:43 PM, you wrote: I had a filter all of a sudden stop working. I have deleted it and recreated it and it still won't work. There are many other filters in this account that are still working correctly Yes I agree, filters are working intermittently on IMAP. Actually just in the last couple of RC's and with the 5.0.8 as well, they have gotten worse. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:skcu...@fastmail.fm Current beta is 5.0.6.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter stopped working
Do you get an exception like this? ClassName: Exception Message: Sizes differ!! IsOSException: 0 Modules: No such exceptions, no specific messages in account's log. just this: sometime given filter works, sometime don't. -- Pozdrowienia, Krzysztof Kudłacik Current beta is 5.0.6.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter stopped working
Hi, No such exceptions, no specific messages in account's log. just this: sometime given filter works, sometime don't. thats a problem since versions. There are no working log for filtering. Thats why i ask for a debug (or whatever) output switch, or something else. I have a message in the bugtracker, but thats only for ReFilter https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=8513 Regards Current beta is 5.0.6.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter stopped working
Hello F.P., A reminder of what F.P. typed on: Thursday, April 07, 2011 at 15:07:54 GMT +0200 FP I have a message in the bugtracker, but thats only for ReFilter FP https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=8513 Yes and it is marked as Verify Wait. but should be changed to Verify Fail. Also add comments to https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=8572 for filtering in general. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:scu...@mts.net Using The Bat! v5.0.8 On Windows 7 6.1 Build #7600 Current beta is 5.0.6.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter stopped working
Hi, Yes and it is marked as Verify Wait. but should be changed to Verify Fail. I cant change that status. I can only choose Resolved and Closed. Also add comments to https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=8572 for filtering in general. Comment added. Regards Current beta is 5.0.6.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter stopped working
Confirmed! exactly the same problem. Thursday, April 7, 2011, 1:57:34 PM, you wrote: I had a filter all of a sudden stop working. Confirmed here. under imap/exchange all filters work randomly - some works at time, other don't. For now I can't see any regularity in filter's behavior Current beta is 5.0.6.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter stopped working
Hi,
I had a filter all of a sudden stop working. I have deleted it and recreated
it and it still won't work. There are many other filters in this account that
are still working correctly
I am asking on the beta list because it stopped working in 5.05
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [5D68F35E.01CBF3BD.0DEAE4F0.0F267AB2]
Name: world-wide_polit...@yahoogroups.com
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`2`0`[World-wide_Politics]\0D\0A}
MoveMessage folder \5C\5C\5CGroups\5CWorld-wide_Politics
IsActive
Ignore
endFilter
same problems here, but with all filters. I cant find any reason why
they doesent work on my account (intergrated IMAP in shared webspace).
Filter (little anonymoused)
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [6C77484A.01CBF474.7D825330.47F8E3F4]
Name: foren10
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`1`0`m...@mailmail.de\0D\0A}
MoveMessage folder \5C\5CPixelfeuer\5CForen
IsActive
Ignore
endFilter
regards
Current beta is 5.0.6.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Access Violation when canceling Re-filter dialog
Hello, when is Re-filter dialog cancelled, following error appears: reported in https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=8462 --- The Bat! --- Access violation at address 7630F05D in module 'kernel32.dll'. Write of address 0030. --- OK --- exceptions log: Date: 18 Feb 2011 22:51:03 OS: Windows 7 build 7600 PhysMemFreeTotal: 1119/2047 MB VirtMemFreeTotal: 1835/2047 MB Address: 7630F05D ClassName: EAccessViolation Message: Access violation at address 7630F05D in module 'kernel32.dll'. Write of address 0030 IsOSException: 1 Modules: 762C 20091208112927 C:\Windows\system32\kernel32.dll 0040 20110218030003 K:\The Bat!\thebat.exe Stack: 7630F05D [762C] 0057F49A [0040] 0057AE98 [0040] 00516956 [0040] 00526AD4 [0040] 004816A3 [0040] 009E7DD2 [0040] 0055C3AF [0040] 00561043 [0040] 00561516 [0040] 00A2046C [0040] 00A20802 [0040] 00A270A8 [0040] 00724FF0 [0040] 00726A6B [0040] 0072630A [0040] 00726D99 [0040] 00C3BBDE [0040] 004DF696 [0040] 0053EA1D [0040] 004DF587 [0040] 00474DD4 [0040] 005651F1 [0040] 0056522A [0040] 00565482 [0040] 00C8DF82 [0040] 00C9363A [0040] 00C9A1C8 [0040] 76311192 [762C] -- Thanks and Bye, Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 5.0.0.140 BETA under Windows 7 6.1 Build 7600 with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, AntispamSniper v 3.2.6.4 Notebook Thinkpad, Core2 Duo 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM Current beta is 5.0.0.140 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: filter works half
Hello Roelof! On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 at 12:15:45 PM you wrote: I've got a filter that moves messages to a folder and marks them as read. The filter used to do both actions (last time was with .129) but with .131 that's broken. Several of my filters are doing that with all v5 builds, particularly problematic seem to be Mark as Read actions. -- Dierk Haasis [DH² Publishing] The Bat 5.0.0.131 BETA on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Chat info upon request Strogatz's First Law of Doing Math: When you're trying to prove something, it helps to know it's true. [Steven Strogatz] Current beta is 5.0.0.131 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: filter works half
Hello Dierk, Wednesday, January 19, 2011, 11:45:03 AM, you wrote: Hello Roelof! On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 at 12:15:45 PM you wrote: I've got a filter that moves messages to a folder and marks them as read. The filter used to do both actions (last time was with .129) but with .131 that's broken. Several of my filters are doing that with all v5 builds, particularly problematic seem to be Mark as Read actions. Confirmed for Mark as Read action. -- Best regards, Tonymailto:t...@parkinch.co.uk The Bat! 5.0.0.131 BETA Current beta is 5.0.0.131 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: filter works half
Hello Roelof, Wednesday, January 19, 2011, 6:15:45 AM, you wrote: RO I've got a filter that moves messages to a folder and marks them as RO read. The filter used to do both actions (last time was with .129) RO but with .131 that's broken. I have a similar filter and it hasn't marked anything as read since v4.x -- Best regards, Richardmailto:newmangr...@gmail.com === Using The Bat! v5.0.0.131 BETA on Windows XP6 Build 7600 Current beta is 5.0.0.131 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: filter works half
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:45:03 +0100, Dierk Haasis Dierk.Haasis- iv1mdsmtiix7xf7qfc6g36honnlkz...@public.gmane.org says... Several of my filters are doing that with all v5 builds, particularly problematic seem to be Mark as Read actions. There is a problem with coloring too. None of my filters is able to color my outgoing messages. I had to create manual filter for read messages and trigger it manually in destination folder for coloring to work. -- br, Zurek Current beta is 5.0.0.131 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter Troubles
Hallo Dierk, On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 10:22:42 +0100GMT (27-12-2010, 10:22 , where I live), you wrote: DH To weed out GMail's Buzz notifications of my own drivel, I created a DH very simple filter, which worked well till v5: http://screencast.com/t/4eh3vJLV DH Now at least some of the message do not get filtered. My only similar filter has been been triggered with v5, though the last times were 17 and 21 December, just before .123 However, in the past I've encountered some issues with subfilters and v5, yours wouldn't be a subfilter, would it? -- Groetjes, Roelof I love my country; it's my government that scares me. http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 5.0.0.123 BETA Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6002 Service Pack 2 6 pop3 accounts, 1 imap account OTFE disabled Quad Core 2.4GHz 4 GB RAM pgpwIR8Vnn4i8.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 5.0.0.123 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter Troubles
Hello Roelof! On Monday, December 27, 2010 at 12:03:02 PM you wrote: However, in the past I've encountered some issues with subfilters and v5, yours wouldn't be a subfilter, would it? No, it is not; it is also the second filter in the list, the first being one filtering for messages marked 'Spam' by the server-side anti-spam system. The Buzz mails are not marked such, hence should be filtered correctly. -- Dierk Haasis [DH² Publishing] The Bat 5.0.0.123 BETA on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Chat info upon request Die Mitteilungsmöglichkeit des Menschen ist gewaltig, doch das meiste, was er sagt, ist hohl und falsch. Die Sprache der Tiere ist begrenzt, aber was sie damit zum Ausdruck bringen, ist wichtig und nützlich. Jede kleine Ehrlichkeit ist besser als eine große Lüge. [Leonardo da Vinci] Current beta is 5.0.0.123 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter FIXED
Hello Sorry, I did not note which version I was using. Vista, SP1, Bat Pro, beta 4.2.13.2- 4.2.13.4 Figures when you ask for help the solution appears. -- Best regards, Dean Current beta is 4.2.13.3 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter name is missing in Account.log when Verbose log option is enabled
Hello Marek, if Verbose logging is enabled and filter deletes message, name of filter with such action is missing in ACCOUNT.LOG, if Verbose log is off, filter name is included. reported in https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7532 It is not the first time this happens. See: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5766 https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6043 -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.1.11.8 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3 See some of my photos at http://www.Rancho-K.com Current beta is 4.1.11.8 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter action move to the folder cannot be set
Hello Roelof, On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 14:00:14 +0100 GMT (02/Mar/09, 20:00 +0700 GMT), Roelof Otten wrote: RO And just now when I needed to create two subfilters (Yes Thomas, RO identical ones for incoming and outgoing) to move messages to a RO different subfolder. Thanks for providing a practical example which is not only on my computer. -- Cheers, Thomas. Cannot open file C:\Program Files\The Bat!\cookies.txt http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.1.11 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current beta is 4.1.11.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter action move to the folder cannot be set
Peter Hampf wrote: when editing the action move to the folder of an existing filter or when creating a new action move for a new filter, TB opens a window and asks for a folder to CREATE NEW messages in! Furthermore it offers room for a template! This was submitted to Bugtrack last week (see https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7502 ). -- Best regards, Zygmunt Wereszczynski Current beta is 4.1.11.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter action move to the folder cannot be set
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, at 11:58:28 [GMT +0100] (which was 11:58 where I
live) Peter Hampf wrote:
when editing the action move to the folder of an existing filter or when
creating a new action move for a new filter, TB opens a window and asks
for a folder to CREATE NEW messages in! Furthermore it offers room for a
template!
I guess this is the wrong window for the specific filter action!
Furthermore it does NOT store the destination folder, resulting in a move
action without any folder!
Here is something heavily mixed up, I guess ...
Confirmations?
Confirmed.
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Henk M. de Bruijn
_
The Bat! Natural Email System 4.1.11.6 on Microsoft® Windows Vista™
Home Premium Versie 6.0.6001 Service Pack 1 Build 6001 64 bit
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8200 @ 2.33GHz, 2333 MHz,4 core('s),4 logic
processors
AntispamSniper for The Bat! Pro 3.2.0.1
pgpVuziLacEwD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Current beta is 4.1.11.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter action move to the folder cannot be set
Hallo Peter, On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 11:58:28 +0100GMT (2-3-2009, 11:58 +0100, where I live), you wrote: PH when editing the action move to the folder of an existing filter or when PH creating a new action move for a new filter, TB opens a window and asks PH for a folder to CREATE NEW messages in! Furthermore it offers room for a PH template! Drats! Confirmed. And just now when I needed to create two subfilters (Yes Thomas, identical ones for incoming and outgoing) to move messages to a different subfolder. I really needed the filters, so I copied the filter to SmartBat inserted the proper path (copied the proper syntax from an existing filter) and pasted it over the filter with the lacking path. -- Groetjes, Roelof Nobody notices when things go right, I'm always noticed. http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 4.1.11.6 Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6001 Service Pack 1 3 pop3 accounts OTFE enabled Quad Core 2.4GHz 4 GB RAM pgpNqEZmddhYd.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 4.1.11.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter action move to the folder cannot be set
Montag, 2. März 2009 at 11:58, Peter Hampf wrote: when editing the action move to the folder of an existing filter or when creating a new action move for a new filter, TB opens a window and asks for a folder to CREATE NEW messages in! Furthermore it offers room for a template! I guess this is the wrong window for the specific filter action! Furthermore it does NOT store the destination folder, resulting in a move action without any folder! Here is something heavily mixed up, I guess ... Confirmations? Already reported and confirmed - it is the wrong dialog. -- With kind Regards Jens Franik mailto:je...@gmx.de Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat! 4.1.11.6 mit AntiSpamSniper 3.2.0.1 und Gaijin XMP Makro Plugin 1.1.91.0 Windows XP 5.1 build 2600 Service Pack 2 AMD Athlon Dual Core 4850e 2,50 GHz, 4 GB RAM 7 POP3 Accounts - 120 Folders Current beta is 4.1.11.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter action move to the folder cannot be set
Montag, 2. März 2009 at 14:00, Roelof Otten wrote: And just now when I needed to create two subfilters I am waiting too, but thank you for your workaround, i will try. -- With kind Regards Jens Franik mailto:je...@gmx.de Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat! 4.1.11.6 mit AntiSpamSniper 3.2.0.1 und Gaijin XMP Makro Plugin 1.1.91.0 Windows XP 5.1 build 2600 Service Pack 2 AMD Athlon Dual Core 4850e 2,50 GHz, 4 GB RAM 7 POP3 Accounts - 120 Folders Current beta is 4.1.11.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter only first action works
[Reply to: »Jens Franik« · 2008-03-18 · 21:20 h (CET)] Moin, Jens! if subject begins with [Spam] - mark as read - move to Folder Spam First is done (mark read) second is not working any more. Confirmations? Cannot confirm. I have tested your filter. Are you sure that the folder \\\Import\_SPAM_ does exist in your installation? Cheers! VA - -- QA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] — [2008-03-18] Direct eMail without [tbb] in subject line will end in Nirvana! Using The Bat! 4.0.18.2 [Pro] on Windows XP [Pro] Service Pack 2. »Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.« Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001), »The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy« Current beta is 4.0.18.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter only first action works
Guten Tag Volker Ahrendt, am Dienstag, 18. März 2008 um 21:45 schrieben Sie: Cannot confirm. I have tested your filter. Are you sure that the folder \\\Import\_SPAM_ does exist in your installation? Absolutely sure, and it always worked recently, of course. Share with: All Account are enabled. Options: Active, continue with other Filters The Filter is Place 4, following after 3 Filters for Color Groups. If i go on edit (move to folder) i see the correct Folder shown, the Create if necessary is not selected. Any other ideas? I was very surprised, it worked @you - did you call the Filter manually, because if i call it manually it works too (Refilter). -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat! 4.0.18.2 Windows 2000 5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current beta is 4.0.18.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter only first action works
[Reply to: »Jens Franik« · 2008-03-18 · 21:55 h (CET)] Moin, Jens! Any other ideas? I was very surprised, it worked @you - did you call the Filter manually, because if i call it manually it works too (Refilter). Both automatic and manual filtering are working! – I just modified the target folder, because I have no folder \\\Import\_Spam_. ;-) Cheers! VA - -- QA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] — [2008-03-18] Direct eMail without [tbb] in subject line will end in Nirvana! Using The Bat! 4.0.18.2 [Pro] on Windows XP [Pro] Service Pack 2. »A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.« – Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001), »Mostly Harmless« Current beta is 4.0.18.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter only first action works
Guten Tag Volker Ahrendt, am Dienstag, 18. März 2008 um 22:33 schrieben Sie: Any other ideas? I was very surprised, it worked @you - did you call the Filter manually, because if i call it manually it works too (Refilter). Both automatic and manual filtering are working! – I just modified the target folder, because I have no folder \\\Import\_Spam_. ;-) Ok, thank you - i will watch this, but right now, there is no more Spam coming in :-) -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat! 4.0.18.2 Windows 2000 5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current beta is 4.0.18.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter settings
Hello Den, When I restart the Bat, all settings Share with... is clear, even through I checked it. I don't use Common filters at all. But I have created a couple of them for test purposes, selected to share them with 2 accounts, re-started TB and the share settings do stick. So, sorry but I cannot confirm. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.99.21 (BETA) on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.99.21 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter condition terminology
Hello Peter, On 2007-07-23 you wrote: I got an email from a list with the following header: Mailing lists usually have a special header identifying the list, e.g., List-Id or List-Post. Mails to this list, for example, have a header line List-Id: tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com. Why not use this for filtering with condition Header field Name contains identifier -- Regards, Uwe Using The Bat! v3.99.8 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter condition terminology
Hallo Peter, On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 11:44:46 -0400GMT (22-7-2007, 17:44 +0200, where I live), you wrote: PK I have a problem with Header. I assumed that it means all in the header, PK wether it is the sender, recipient, subject, cc etc. That's what I think too. PK But somehow it doesn't PK work that way. When I tried to specify if sender, recipient, subject, cc PK etc separately it appears working, but requires a number of condition PK instead of a single one. Could you give me an example that that doesn't work and why you expected that it would work? -- Groetjes, Roelof WinErr: 010 Reserved for future mistakes by our developers http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 3.99.8 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 2 pop3 accounts OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpU1GWHjD96M.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter condition terminology
Hallo Roger, On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 10:29:14 +0200GMT (22-7-2007, 10:29 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RP Can anybody please explain the difference between 'Sender' and 'Message RP source' in the filter conditions list? Sure. 'Sender' checks wether the search string is found in any of the sender headers like From:, Sender:, Resent-from:, etc 'Source' checks for the search string in the message source, that is the full headers and the message body. (Not in any attachments I think.) -- Groetjes, Roelof I'd Have Written Sooner But I Thought I Owed You Money. http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 3.99.8 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 2 pop3 accounts OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpFFXpQjLWBg.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter condition terminology
On Sun 22-Jul-07 4:02am -0600, Roelof Otten wrote: 'Sender' checks wether the search string is found in any of the sender headers like From:, Sender:, Resent-from:, etc Yes and has been that way for years. I still think this is poor design and have since it bit me several years ago. Filter selections that are actual header field names should filter on that header field name. To help the user wanting to select on multiple header fields, a choice such as Sender fields could replace Sender. Sender should mean Header field - Sender. A similar problem exists for From. BTW, Roelof, I notice you and many others are using 3.99.8. I've downgraded from 3.99.9 and renamed my rouges.msl back. -- Best regards, Bill TB! Pro 3.99.8 AntispamSniper 1.8.0.8 XP Pro SP2 POP3 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter Actions: Redirect and Forward
Hallo Roger, On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 11:15:26 +0200GMT (26-4-2006, 11:15 +0100, where I live), you wrote: S Can anyone confirm the status of the Redirect filter action? RO Works fine here. Redirect was used as only action... RP Definitely does *not* work here as a 'Read' filter. What do you mean with 'does not work'? Is the filter triggered? Is the message sent, but garbled? Is the message not? Is the message created? What kind of message did you try to redirect? Mine was a plain text one created by TB. -- Groetjes, Roelof Everyone IS entitled to my opinion. The Bat! 3.72.12 (Beta) Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpQSLqXXlGzb.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.72.12 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filter Actions: Redirect and Forward
Hallo Simon, On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 06:50:06 +0100GMT (25-4-2006, 7:50 +0100, where I live), you wrote: S Can anyone confirm the status of the Redirect filter action? Works fine here. Redirect was used as only action... -- Groetjes, Roelof Cannibals don't eat lawyers. Professional courtesy. The Bat! 3.72.12 (Beta) Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpCTUvAirUO7.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.72.12 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filter/Search messages using attachment filename
Hello NetVicious, On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 15:46:26 +0100 GMT (09/12/2005, 21:46 +0700 GMT), NetVicious wrote: N I tried with a filter (File matching mask Removed by Antivirus .* is N attached but it don't deletes any message. I probed also N with a Search (using attachment in the combobox) but I got the same as N the filter, no message found. Try searching without the asterisk: Removed by Antivirus only. -- Cheers, Thomas. Prepositions are not words to end sentences with. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.63.06 (Beta) under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.63.08 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filter/Search messages using attachment filename
Hello NetVicious, On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 18:57:21 +0100 GMT (10/12/2005, 00:57 +0700 GMT), NetVicious wrote: Try searching without the asterisk: Removed by Antivirus only. N The same: 0 messages found searching and no message filtered when N using a filter. Where do you search? Any part contains? If these headers are indeed in your mail this smells like a bug. N Do you tried it? No. N I'm using OTFE. That might be significant. I'll back out, as I don't use OTFE. -- Cheers, Thomas. Was ist ein Optimist ? - Jemand der das eine Fernsehprogramm langweilig findet und auf das andere umschaltet! http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.63.06 (Beta) under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.63.08 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re-filter dialog - CheckBoxes responding on return key
Hello List! I think this has to do with the overall themeing functionality available now. Normally checkboxes etc. must not react on the return key, they should be switched with the space bar, and hitting the return key the OK button should be activated (if OK Button is default) - Open refilter dialog - Press enter... - normally it should activate the OK button and re-filter - but now the first focused check box is switched on and off -- Regards, Stefan TheBat! v3.61.06 Echo (Beta) with Windows XP v5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.61.05 (Echo) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Re-filter dialog - CheckBoxes responding on return key
Hello Stefan, I think this has to do with the overall themeing functionality available now. Normally checkboxes etc. must not react on the return key, they should be switched with the space bar, and hitting the return key the OK button should be activated (if OK Button is default) - Open refilter dialog - Press enter... - normally it should activate the OK button and re-filter - but now the first focused check box is switched on and off Tab to the OK button, and then you should press the Enter. I prefer this way. Why? On some webpage when you accidentally press Enter, you send the form, many times not filled all fields. Same here: the normal way of things is to give a confirmation (selecting the OK button in the refilter window) before you press the Enter, to tell the software, Yes, I am wanting to OK this refilter process. -- Vili Current beta is 3.61.05 (Echo) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[2]: Re-filter dialog - CheckBoxes responding on return key
Hello Stefan, Ok, this would not be a problem if I had an shortcut for my lovely OK... That should be the solution then. -- Vili Current beta is 3.61.06 (Echo) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Re-filter dialog - CheckBoxes responding on return key
Hello List! Hi Vili, on 21.09.2005 at 22:30 [UTC -0400] you wrote: Tab to the OK button, and then you should press the Enter. Well this is annoying. Mainly i work with the keyboard and its not comfortable to get all the other stuff just to reach the OK button. And I am not willing to grab for the mouse :) I prefer this way. Why? On some webpage when you accidentally press Enter, you send the form, many times not filled all fields. Same here: Aehmm? Another confirmation that I want to re-filter? Excuse me, but i can't agree with your point of view. Because if I press enter, this is my confirmation that it is ok to re-filter. You have to be more carefully and TB! in fact is not a webpage form. This is a dialog box where i know which things are on it and can check it in a split of a second that it is OK. And the default settings for the re-filter box are mostly ok for me, so it is simply annoying to get through all things... Ok, this would not be a problem if I had an shortcut for my lovely OK... BTW: It is common to declare a default button on dialogs.. for example what about the options dialog..? or nearly every other dialog in GUIs? I think it is a faulty handling of messages from the TSpTBXCheckBox class... because it is not restricted to the re-filter dialog. Every check box is affected. And it's interesting handling of the Keys... - Focus one CheckBox - Press SPACE - Checkbox will not immediately check - Release SPACE - CB will wait for release-key - Press RETURN - CB will check immediatly - Key repeating will take effect -- Regards, Stefan TheBat! v3.61.06 Echo (Beta) with Windows XP v5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.61.06 (Echo) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filter and OTFE - some do not work
Hello Peter Hampf everyone else, on 14-Jul-2005 at 12:53 you (Peter Hampf) wrote: can anybody confirm that a filter with the condition Message source [contains or match] does NOT work in conjunction with OTFE? I have the feeling that this condition doesn't work at all. See msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on TBUDL. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Deliplayer2 is playing: Everyday (8:41) by Bus vs Slide from the 2000 album 'The Warp Experience' Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: filter for extracting attachments doesn't work
On 2005-05-26 (10:26), you wrote:
I use TB! with encrypted messagebase and I try this filter:
I forgot: this is 'read' messages filter.
Best regards, Krzysztof Kudacik
--
pb _, )\__/( ,_ Polska Strona Programu The Bat! |
/'.;`-.`{..}',-';.`\ http://thebat.pl |
/'.'; `-,`--',-' ;`.`\ The Bat! Polish Support |
\/\/^\---.\;;/.---/^\/\/ |
3.5.0.17 : Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Dodatek Service Pack 2
:krk:
Current beta is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: filter for extracting attachments doesn't work
Hello Krzysztof, I use TB! with encrypted messagebase and I try this filter: confirmed for encrypted message base. It works in normal version and also in SecureBat!. -- best regards Miroslav BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu News-Ticker: http://thebat.orgavision.de/bat-mail.xml Klipfolio Klip: http://thebat.orgavision.de/klipfolio Current beta is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: filter for extracting attachments doesn't work
On 2005-05-26 (12:39), you wrote:
confirmed for encrypted message base. It works in normal version and
also in SecureBat!.
Please add note in BT:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4710
Best regards, Krzysztof Kudacik
--
pb _, )\__/( ,_ Polska Strona Programu The Bat! |
/'.;`-.`{..}',-';.`\ http://thebat.pl |
/'.'; `-,`--',-' ;`.`\ The Bat! Polish Support |
\/\/^\---.\;;/.---/^\/\/ |
3.5.0.17 : Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Dodatek Service Pack 2
:krk:
Current beta is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filter on VF created from Search tool is wrong
Hi Miguel N Hope you don't mind being a test subject. :) M I don't mind being a 'test', but maybe I mind being a 'subject' ;-) ;) I'll go along with that. 'subject of gossip', perhaps, but not just any old 'subject'. -- Groetjes Natasha Pearce The Bat! 3.5 on Windows XP Professional 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filter on VF created from Search tool is wrong
Hello Natasha, Hope you don't mind being a test subject. :) I don't mind being a 'test', but maybe I mind being a 'subject' ;-) 3. VF appears only after restart of TB!. 4. VF shows as empty. 5. Remove unwanted conditions from VF. Results match folder contents. I was almost sure something like that would happen. Have added a note to your report. Thanks for that :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.5 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filter on VF created from Search tool is wrong
Hi Miguel M Please see attached PNG and add supporting note to M https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4661 if you can confirm and M agree. Definitely confirmed, and absolutely agree. Hope you don't mind being a test subject. :) 1. Search my TB! list folders for Sender contains MAU. Results match folder contents. 2. Create VF from search dialog and confirm folder list as correct. All 4 conditions present. 3. VF appears only after restart of TB!. 4. VF shows as empty. 5. Remove unwanted conditions from VF. Results match folder contents. Have added a note to your report. -- Groetjes Natasha Pearce The Bat! 3.5 on Windows XP Professional 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
3.0.9.7 (re)filter / mark junk issue
Hi TB Beta list members, I have observed that, even with a group of messages selected in a folder, you cannot mark all or re-filter folder contents unless one of the messages is in the preview / has the focus. -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user TB! v3.0.9.7 Return (pre-beta) on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 ' pgpBSMjGwnBFf.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.0.9.7 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filter
Hello Den, DVY How can i remove quick filter on folder (setted by Alt+Click on Message Field)? DVY ESC doesn't work. Ctrl+= (or View/Display/All messages) -- 9Val Current beta is 3.0.9.5 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filter not updated when account name changes
On Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 2:19:11 AM [GMT -0500], Thorvald Neumann wrote: But the filters do not get updated with this new foldername, when the target folder resides inside the current account. An oldie, but baddie. :/ Confirmed a long time ago in a .. -- ... . | IMAP Client: The Bat! v3.0.9.4 Return _.||* _ |\/| |IMAP Server: MDaemon Pro (_]|||(/,| | | OS: Windows XP Pro (Service Pack 2) -=-=- Dangerous exercise: Jumping to conclusions. pgpMJms5i4Zaz.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.0.9.3 Pre-beta | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filter not updated when account name changes
Hæ! Thursday, February 10, 2005, 08:29, Peter Fjelsten wrote: Confirmed! The entry in BT is here: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4257 -- Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/ | The Bat! v3.0.2.10 Professional K9 v1.28 | Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195) Listening to: DeutschlandRadio Berlin Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filter not updated when account name changes
Hæ! Thursday, February 10, 2005, 08:19, Thorvald Neumann wrote: But the filters do not get updated with this new foldername, when the target folder resides inside the current account. This should be accountname and not foldername. E.g. my move filter says [EMAIL PROTECTED] I changed the account to xyz.xyz.de, but the accountname in the move filters is not adjusted. -- Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/ | The Bat! v3.0.2.10 Professional K9 v1.28 | Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195) Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filter not updated when account name changes
Thorvald, On 10-02-2005 08:22, you [TN] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: TN I changed the account to xyz.xyz.de, but the accountname in the move TN filters is not adjusted. Confirmed! -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter Fjelsten /author thebat version 3.0.1.33 Pro /thebat version env. ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. /env. os Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 /os Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Scheduled re-filter hole
Hi TB Beta list members, I just went to add a scheduled refilter only to find that it doesn't include common folders or common filter sets. Oops. Anyone done a BT for this? -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user TB! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 ' pgpUb0lGiT13a.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Scheduled re-filter hole
Hello all, Tuesday, January 4, 2005, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: I just went to add a scheduled refilter only to find that it doesn't include common folders or common filter sets. Oops. Anyone done a BT for this? please look to Sheduller category in BT, I have added many issues for Re-filter and Backup actions, some of them were already fixed. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 3.0.2.10 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Notebook Acer, Pentium4-M 2.2 GHz, 512 MB RAM, ADSL line Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Scheduled re-filter hole
Dear Marek, @4-Jan-2005, 16:21 +0100 (04-Jan 15:21 UK time) Marek Mikus [MM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I just went to add a scheduled refilter only to find that it doesn't include common folders or common filter sets. Oops. Anyone done a BT for this? MM please look to Sheduller category in BT, I have added many issues MM for Re-filter and Backup actions, some of them were already fixed. You have indeed, but not that one ;-). https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4200 -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user TB! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 ' pgpn7EEAeKcPT.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Scheduled re-filter hole
* Marck D Pearlstone schrieb am 2005-01-04 16:14: Hi TB Beta list members, I just went to add a scheduled refilter only to find that it doesn't include common folders or common filter sets. Oops. Anyone done a BT for this? As far as I can see in the source of the message it was PGP/MIME signed. But Thunderbird/Einigmail and Gemini can't recognize the signature... -- Regards, Martin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Scheduled re-filter hole
Dear Martin, @04-Jan-2005, 17:05 +0100 (04-Jan 16:05 UK time) Martin Schoch [MS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I just went to add a scheduled refilter only to find that it doesn't include common folders or common filter sets. Oops. Anyone done a BT for this? MS As far as I can see in the source of the message it was PGP/MIME signed. MS But Thunderbird/Einigmail and Gemini can't recognize the signature... Nothing wrong with my PGP/MIME signature at all. Do you have my key on your keyring and both of those (strange pieces of alien technology that are clearly OT for this mailing list) configured to handle PGP/MIME correctly? -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user TB! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 ' pgpeBV99pUxz6.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filter does not move message ?
Cedric,
Monday, October 18, 2004, 2:16:07 PM, you wrote:
Bonjour !
Since the current beta I think, it seems that my filter does not move
message to trash until I switch to another folder and comme back to
the current.
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [C802E690.01C48FC1.4E4E4E93.00B01AE6]
Name: Submit\20spam\20to\20SpamRBL
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`0`0`\0D\0A}
MoveMessage folder \5C\5Ceasysoft\5CTrash
MarkRead
CreateMessage template %put\3D\27C:\5Ctemp\5Cexport.txt\27\0D\0A address [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
ExportMessage Kludges OverwriteExist FmtUnix filename C:\5Ctemp\5Cexport.txt
IsManual
IsActive
IsHotkey
IsHotkeyOnly
IsSendQueue
endFilter
I believe that this is a known bug in the current beta, hopefully will
be sorted out in the next one
--
Sean Rima [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 679813 YAHOO: thecivvie
O2 +353863868343 Vodafone +353872628431
Using TheBat! 3.0.2.1 and BayesIt! 0.7.3
:irl-flag:
pgp2PcwXm7QMD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: filter using colour not working correctly
Hello Chris, Sunday, October 17, 2004, 12:43:23 AM, you wrote: C First off I hope this doesn't double pot. It's been 10 minutes and my C first email hasn't shown up so here is this one. C It seems when I create a filter for incoming mail all the types of C filters seem to work except colour. It won't colour the message until C it's read. ex. viewing it for 2 seconds in my case. Any other C problems like this. When you set up your color group there are two choices. One is called Normal (which actually means Read) and the other is Unread. Do you have the Unread set or just the Normal? Typically, the one for the Unread message also has Bold selected. There are also two choices, one for font color and one for background color. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 On Windows 98 4.10 Build # Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filter problem with IMAP account
mml, On 19-09-2004 14:02, you [mmd] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: mmd I filter my Inbox for a particular email adress, assign a color group and mmd finally move these messages to another folder. Each time I assign a colour group to an IMAP message, that colour group is lost on moving the message. -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter Fjelsten /author thebat version 3.0.0.15 /thebat version os Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1/os Current beta is 3.00.15 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filter problem with IMAP account
Mml, [M] wrote: I filter my Inbox for a particular email adress, assign a color group and finally move these messages to another folder. When I use this filter with IMAP provider1 the filter always fails. The result is that these messages stay in the Inbox and don't have the appropriate color. When I invoke the filter manually from the filter properties dialog this works fine !! When I use the same filter with my IMAP provider2 account it works without any problems. That's strange right ? Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong ? This is an interesting insight. I have only one IMAP provider and that's myself. I've been noting that my Inbox filters work when they feel like. Some seem to work consistently, while others don't. Both are filters that look for header string matches. In fact, the one that often doesn't work at all is one that matches all messages not yet already filtered (it's the last filter in the filter set). I've never thought that the filter could be working differently depending on the provider and that this could be a factor in the existence of this annoying problem. All I can say is that you're certainly not alone with this problem and that it isn't your fault or anything you're doing wrong. It's just TB! IMAP and we have to wait for a fix if we're up to waiting. Does your provider allow for server side filtering? Many providers allow for webmail control of IMAP accounts. These webmail interfaces often allow for filtering. You could setup filters there and then let TB!'s broken filtering do as little as possible. This is my current system of dealing with things. I'd go nuts and run if I had to filter all my IMAP mail with TB!. -- -= Allie =- . Imagination is more important than knowledge - Einstein ___ IMAP Client: The Bat! v3.0.0.15 | SquirrelMail WebMail IMAP Server: Mdaemon Pro | OS: Windows XP Pro (Service Pack 2) Current beta is 3.00.15 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filter problem with IMAP account
Peter Fjelsten, [PF] wrote: Each time I assign a colour group to an IMAP message, that colour group is lost on moving the message. This isn't surprising since moving the message moves the message to another IMAP folder on the server. TB! sync's with this IMAP folder which holds no information about colour group assignment, a purely local feature for TB!. As a result, there is no colour group assignment when you check the message in the other folder. You may propose then that RL implements a system when the colour group is locally reassigned when the message is moved. I'd wonder why bother since it really isn't worth the hassle. If you fire up another TB! client on another machine and access the IMAP account, all colour groups assigned via the initial TB! installation will not be seen. What's the point then of using an attribute that doesn't carry across to other IMAP clients? If you use a single client, then why use IMAP then? TB! needs to implement the added message attributes that are standard for the IMAP protocol, so that when you label the message, ThunderBird will show it, Mulberry will show it, and last but not least, your other TB! installations at other locations will show it. I'd personally disagree with the proposal that they commit efforts at making colour groups work better when it's only local. -- -= Allie =- . It's smart to pick your friends, but not to pieces. ___ IMAP Client: The Bat! v3.0.0.15 | SquirrelMail WebMail IMAP Server: Mdaemon Pro | OS: Windows XP Pro (Service Pack 2) Current beta is 3.00.15 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filter action : delete msg leaves ticker window active
Hello 9Val, 9 Strange, I'll test again Tested, works fine. May be you have message duplication? -- 9Val Current beta is 2.13 'Lucky' Beta/6 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filter action : delete msg leaves ticker window active
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 VH Tested, works fine. May be you have message duplication? I'm not sure what you mean. Are you suggesting that I am receiving 2 or messages that are the same one after the other and that the filter is or isn't doing something properly with one of them? Firstly I very much doubt that the msgs are being duplicated at source as they are sent out periodically from a server to many people here and no one is receiving duplicates. However, even if the msgs /were/ being duplicated at source then surely the system should just process them one after the other? And it's important to remember that the messages /are/ being deleted; there is no sign of them in the inbox; just the ticker. As soon as I switch to the inbox the ticker clears, prior to switching the folder view /does not/ show any unread messages nor do they show up on the unread tab. - -- :Stuart_Hemming: Using The Bat! v2.13 Lucky Beta/6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Aided by BayesIt! 0.5.10 PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com What is a committee? A group of the unwilling, picked from the unfit, to do the unnecessary. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0 Comment: Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com; iQA/AwUBQSIOAtttnLhkydF1EQK3TACbBNmxqS86Ww4Ch65wiUmH+3pMtwYAn2IX 05JIvlG0fLKDceN9Bi49jk15 =pFzs -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current beta is 2.13 'Lucky' Beta/6 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filter action : delete msg leaves ticker window active
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 VH Tested, works fine. May be you have message duplication? I can't explain why, but these message are also being flagged as deleted on the server after delivery; I have no idea what's causing /that/ to happen. My engineer says that nothing is set on the server to auto delete /any/ message on delivery. The following is from the account log which shows the filter is active and working but as I type the ticker is still telling me about this message and will continue to do so until I switch the the account's inbox. 17/08/2004, 15:25:54: FETCH - 3 messages in the mailbox, 1 new 17/08/2004, 15:25:54: FETCH - Received message from [EMAIL PROTECTED], size: 1213 bytes, subject: Symantec AVF detected an unrepairable virus in a message in your mailbox 17/08/2004, 15:25:54: FETCH - received message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (1213 bytes) (processed by Virus Scanner Messages, deleted) 17/08/2004, 15:25:55: FETCH - connection finished - 1 messages received - -- :Stuart_Hemming: Using The Bat! v2.13 Lucky Beta/6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Aided by BayesIt! 0.5.10 PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com A flashlight is a case for holding dead batteries. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0 Comment: Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com; iQA/AwUBQSIWS9ttnLhkydF1EQJ8xwCfUXMAm57itXvzE+CEHHKxIOz93wgAoJLL ThIl3BXua3tCNU6ZdnKVf7B9 =qcsh -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current beta is 2.13 'Lucky' Beta/6 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filter meanings are baffling and ambiguous IMHO
Hello Richard, On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RW I now have 'my messages' filter AFTER The Bat filters and it is set to RW be sender contains my address and source folder is all three Bat RW folders. I then assign my messages with the set colour group but they RW still only get marked when read - very frustrating. Oh dear, now they aren't getting marked as my messages when read. Strange. I've changed it and made a separate my message filter before each of The Bat folders. We'll see if this one works! -- Regards, Richard | Using The Bat! 2.13 Lucky Beta/5 SpamPal | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5.1 Service Pack 1 | and the best browser: Opera 7.53 build 3850 PGP public key: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCA93B5BE Current beta is 2.13 'Lucky' Beta/5 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filter converting bug
Hello Den,
Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 06:39 you wrote at
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here another one:
Old filter:
BeginFilter
Name: Test
Active: 1
Source: \\Test Account\Inbox
Target: \\Test Account\Inbox
CopyFolder: none
MainSet: 00
Actions: faoAdvColor
AddGroups:
DelGroups:
ForwardTemplate:
ConfirmTemplate:
ReplyTemplate:
FwdAddr:
RedirectAddr:
NewAddr:
NewTemplate:
ExtCmd:
ExtFile:
ExtractDir:
ColourGroup: default
AddAddrItems: afiFrom,
DelAddrItems: afiFrom,
HotKey: 0
IsOfColour: DNSBL
SizeBigger: 0
SizeSmaller: 0
AgeOlder: 0
AgeNewer: 0
InAddrPos: 0
OutAddrPos: 0
InAddrGroups:
NoAddrGroups:
KillFile:
KillMethod: 0
SaveTemplate:
SndFile:
SysSound: 0
SoundTime: 0:00-0:00
AllowTime: 0:00-0:00
EndFilter
Look at IsOfColor!
New filter:
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [E31CB632.01C47A4F.1298FA5B.6CF011C9]
Name: New\20rule
Filter: {0\0D\0A}
MoveMessage folder \5C\5CTest\20Account\5CSent
endFiltere
9Val, can you reproduce?
--
Regards,
Richard Anders, http://www.batboard.de
Current beta is 2.13 'Lucky' Beta/2 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Filter Action : Autorize Download of Image
Hello Damien, On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:15:24 +0200 GMT (29/03/2004, 14:15 +0700 GMT), Damien wrote: D As describe here : D D https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0001780 Just a suggestion. Could you post the description here? I am not following each bug, and having to log in to view what it is about discourages me from even looking. Maybe it's just me, though. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. The closest I ever got to a 4.0 in high school was my blood alcohol content. Message reply created with The Bat! 2.05 Beta/12 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 256MB RAM Current beta is 2.05 beta 12 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Re-filter functionality requires several calls to get done
I have an IMAP account on a Courier IMAP server. When I choose Folder | Re-filter... in my Inbox, only a small part of the messages gets filtered on the first try - thought they all matches to the very same rule. This issue seems to be fixed in the 2.00/Beta 5. Thanks a lot! //Tero Current beta is 2.0b4 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: filter strings import
Hello Patrick is there a way to import filter strings for spam filters from a text files? if not, this would be a very useful feature, we could easily exchange filter rules that way... Yes.. but not a way that works (for me at least) ... Account | Sorting Office | Selective Download | New | Advanced | Load signal strings from file | browse .. the rest should be obvious. Text file is of the format.. @0ver-40.com @123india.com @163.net @2dobiz.com @888.nu @aa.net @aaaimports.com @aaanews.com @aallbiz.com @aawp.org @abbottsys.com @abcweb.com @abest.com @absolutelyagency.lt @abusiness.com @abvintl.com @accubilling.com @accuread.com @acsi.net @activeink.com @adagent.com @adja.org @admail.net @adult.com @adult.com @adultad.com @adultavista.com @adultchamber.com @adultfusion.com @adulthost.net @adultlinks.net @adultnudes.com @adultphotos.com @adultplayground.com @adultpromo.net @adultsexpictures.com @adultsextoystore.com @adultwatch.com @adultwebsites.com @adultzone.com I have this setup.. but it still doesn't work correctly for me. I have 2 setup, 1 for spammer domains, the other for suspect subject strings. (separate filters) I hope this helps regards, Graham Using The Bat! 1.60q under Windows NT 4.0 (Build 1381, Service Pack 6) -- Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of Merck Co., Inc. (Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA) that may be confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by e-mail and then delete it. == _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re: filter strings import
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Graham Foster [GF] wrote: GF Text file is of the format.. Make sure there are no blank lines in that file. That's the only thing I can add. - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.60q | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQE9Bye9V8nrYCsHF+IRAvLfAJ0dugemRvA5ZVSViqRC2rJIiw5wDgCfZYhm O/DP+pHQtbHfs6OpkN59huY= =YISG -END PGP SIGNATURE- _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re: Filter string
On Tuesday, June 11, 2002, Adam wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: If I have a filter, and string set for presence Yes, then that is a requirement for any message to satisfy, regardless of any other setting, is that correct? Adam, If I understand your meaning, then Yes. The string set (the content for which the program will search) and the presence condition (whether the trigger is the presence or the absence of the string set) together form what is sometimes called a rule. There can also be alternative rules in the same filter, which can be thought of as one collective rule. Some rules are under the rule tab, such as the presence of string sets. Other rules are under the advanced tab. Then there is an action. Some actions are actually set on the rule tab, e.g., Move message to folder X. Other actions are on the action tab. (Rule + action) = filter. -- JN _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re: Filter question
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 12:59:34 AM, you wrote: Hello Keith. Thanks for replying to my question. At 6:43 PM on Tuesday, April 30, 2002 you wrote the following about [Filter question]: What is the ks_c=5601 bit? Keith That's the part of the header that says the message Keith codeset is Korean. If you don't expect to be Keith receiving any Korean messages, it would be a logical Keith place to filter True enough. The reason I posed the question was because I had been trying to filter for Turkish spam I was advised that I might lose non-spam msgs by filtering on a character set. This didn't bother me as I don't speak Turkish but I wasn't [and still am not] sure that each language is *only* governed by one character set. If this were so, then I could check the character set for any foreign language msg I got filter for it. Do you know if this is the case? TIA I have successfully filtered on this character set, and so far only gibberish messages have been put in the junk folder. I have not lost a single none Korean font message, yet. Once I have ascertained that nothing I want gets transferred to the junk folder I will set it up to delete. Even if it's not spam, I can't read it and am not interested in trying, so it works fine for me. -- Best regards, Chris Wilson mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.formula3.freeserve.co.uk _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re: Filter question
Hello, Chris. On Wed, 1 May 2002 17:50:22 +0100 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, May 01, 2002, 10:50 AM -0700 GMT here, you wrote: I have successfully filtered on this character set, and so far only gibberish messages have been put in the junk folder. I have not lost a single none Korean font message, yet. Once I have ascertained that nothing I want gets transferred to the junk folder I will set it up to delete. Even if it's not spam, I can't read it and am not interested in trying, so it works fine for me. For Korean, this should work very well. Certainly, this character set is not used for any other language, and it's pretty much the only character set used for Korean email. Unfortunately, I have to use other methods since I do want to receive some Korean messages Keith ...B.Gates : quality software :: R.McDonald : gourmet cuisine _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re: FIlter Log
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Friday, January 18, 2002 at 12:24:53 PM , Eddie Castelli wrote the following on the FIlter Log thread: EC Is there an option to check what filter has moved what to where? Nope. Heh I believe that once I have asked for this feature, aka please give us an option to set filter logs for each filter - -- Maintenance-free means that when it breaks, it can't be fixed. __ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) Comment: Member of the PGP-Basics, Encryption Help Team iD8DBQE8SUml8WBGNj3ut+0RAnp9AJ46fTks+8OFhOIg+CqlMq4iiNOAsgCgxqz8 9gL9Q5sdCELmYNA/5PqqMgk= =3O31 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wish List : http://wish.thebat.dutaint.com BugTraq: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re: Filter
Wednesday, January 17, 2001, 2:53:10 PM, you wrote: D I haven't had any trouble with rule/filters working while there is D incoming mail. However, I just noticed that when I created a new D rule, then chose the refilter options, the filter box shows that x D amount of posts were filtered yet they "were not moved"? Anyone D else see this? I had moved the posts back into the inbox in my third account and again ran the rules/refilter option. Again same results. The refilter box shows 15 post were filtered, yet nothing was moved/copied into the sub-folder assigned. Perhaps there already exists a filter for the same string ? Try checking the "override existing filters" in the "create mail filter" dialogue. -- mfg, Stefan -- __ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Filter question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Chris, On 02 December 2000 at 00:17:53 + (which was 00:17 where I live) Chris Wilson wrote and made these points: Write an outgoing filter to move messages to Sent (i.e. not move) and, as an action, copy the message to the required folder. Thanks Marck, a typo there I think, you meant "write an outgoing filter to COPY messages to sent", right? Or do you mean move... ? I have a lot of trouble with filters, they often spring a few surprises on me :-) Please just confirm this if you get a chance! "Move" is the terminology of filters. A filter has a fundamental purpose of "moving" messages from one folder to another. If "moving" is not required you have to specify source as destination. BTW what is the Hash: SHA1 thing for, just curious, is it to do with PGP, something I have never really played with? It is. It is a part of the PGP signing envelope. - -- Cheers, .\\arck [Marck D. Pearlstone | Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA ] [ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ] [ PGP Key: http://www.silverstones.com/MarckPGP.asc ] [Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs ] TB! v1.48 Beta/7 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness iQA/AwUBOijTMznkJKuSnc2gEQLFtgCfYtS5JmyK6cUybIwgGwIbDW6hnd4AoPR6 eF3zbseUmBKhbAfSFtXqDBtm =I7LB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- -- View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Filter question
Hello Chris, On Sat, 2 Dec 2000 at 00:17:53 GMT + (which was 4:17 PM where I live) witnesses say Chris Wilson typed: Write an outgoing filter to move messages to Sent (i.e. not move) and, as an action, copy the message to the required folder. Thanks Marck, a typo there I think, you meant "write an outgoing filter to COPY messages to sent", right? Or do you mean move... ? The filter will have your source folder as your outbox (That's where the message starts out.) Put the destination folder as the SENT folder (If you put outbox your recipient will get *lots* of copies). Under actions use the COPY function to put a copy in some other folder. You can interchange Sent and the other folder, it doesn't really matter. Just pick a convention and stick to it so that debugging becomes easier. I have a lot of trouble with filters, they often spring a few surprises on me :-) Please just confirm this if you get a chance! I highly recommend the FAQ tutorial on filters. The Kill filter part is a bit out of date, but the rest is still applicable. Check it out at: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com BTW what is the Hash: SHA1 thing for, just curious, is it to do with PGP, something I have never really played with? Yep. -- Thanks for writing, Januk Aggarwal See header for e-mail address Using The Bat! 1.48 Beta/8 under Windows 98 4.10 Build A on a PIII 550MHz with 192 MB RAM -- -- View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Filter problems
Hi phil, I made a "Catch All Filter" for my personal use like this. [example snipped] Thanks, phil. If you read through the thread, however, you would find the problem I (or Marek) have isn't to come up with a perfect filter condition (string) that would catch all. The problem is, I have some "munual" filters that I don't want to run when I *re-filter* a folder. Marck suggested using a "catch-all" filter between automatic filters and manual filters as a "stop point", which I think is a good idea. Nevertheless, a catch-all filter has to move messages somewhere, and I don't want messages (that fall into the "catch-all" category) moved at all when I re-filter a folder. Hence the problem. Thanks anyway. -- Best regards, Ming-Li Using The Bat! 1.46 Beta/2 under Win2k -- -- View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Filter problems
Hi Marek, I need to do following function: delete from folder (not to Trash) selected message by defined schortcut, but not, if is parked or flagged. I created following filtr: - String : @ - "Actions/Delete the messag"e selected - "Options/Execute action set of this rule" selected - Schotcut - Ctrl+Shift+Alt+O - "Advanced/Message is unparked" selected - "Advanced/Message is not flagged" selected When I apply this filtr by pressing this schortcut on parked message, this message disappears in this folder. When I change folder and select back to previous, message is still there - cosmetic bug. Confirmed. Same problem, when I uncheck options "Message is unparked" and "Message is not flagged" in section "Advanced. When I apply this filtr by pressing this schortcut on flagged message, this message is deleted! - section Advanced was not used, I think. You're right, when applying a filter on selected messages with a hotkey, no filtering conditions (including the search string, and conditions in the advanced pane) would be used, IF the source folder is the same as the destination folder, UNLESS the option "Check the selected messages against this rule" is checked. Confusing? You bet. And this is designed behavior, not a bug. (Speaking with a straight face. :-| ) What happened to parked messages in your case is accidental: parked messages can't be deleted with a filter no matter what (before unparking it first), not because TB abides to the condition you set. A bit of history (from someone with a little more than 2 month's experience): It's long been lamented that TB's filters, with all its prowess, couldn't be used without moving messages to a certain folder. Hence RIT designed sort of a backdoor trick as described above. (Or it's been there all long, I don't know.) So you may set both the source folder and the destination folder to Inbox, and apply the filter to other folders with a hotkey without those messages being moved to Inbox. IOW, pressing the hotkey would simply do the designated "actions" on selected messages, with no regard to any other condition. For your purpose, enable the ""Check the selected messages against this rule" will do. Theoretically, it would make TB move the matched messages to the destination folder (even if it's the same as the source folder), but it won't be a problem here since TB execute the "delete" action first, hence no messages left to move. -- Best regards, Ming-Li Using The Bat! 1.46 Beta/2 under Win2k -- -- View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Filter defunctionated
Hi Jast, Just recently, about since June 28, a filter for marking my own messages as unread and with a color group, has stopped working on messages that I send through a mailing list and receive back again. It does work on messages I send myself. Since it works on messages you send to yourself, the filter setting should be fine. To be sure, I've just created a filter exactly as you described, and it does mark your message in both TBBETA and TBUDL as it should. Do you mean the problem occurs only on messages for one particular mailing list, or any mailing list (I'm trying to decipher what "a mailing list" mean). If it's the former, I would check if the list has changed its header. Some mailing lists would strip the original "From" information from the header. -- Best regards, Ming-Li mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Filter defunctionated
Morning Ming-Li, Do you mean the problem occurs only on messages for one particular mailing list, or any mailing list (I'm trying to decipher what "a mailing list" mean). If it's the former, I would check if the list has changed its header. Some mailing lists would strip the original "From" information from the header. Nope, it happens with all messages sent to and then received by a mailing list, be it TBUDL, TBBETA, or various egroups mailing lists - no difference. None of these lists has changed their header, and it *should* be properly detected. This is what confuses me. -- .. Jast ... mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : using TB 1.45 Beta/5 : with AMD K6-2, 64MB RAM :. on Windows 98 4.10 A Jabber [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM jasticle ICQ 37456745 -- -- View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
