Re[2]: Message templates (again)

2000-09-16 Thread Marcel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Marck, On Saturday, September 16, 2000, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: MDP The above wrapping errors are caused by allowing PGP to wrap the text MDP before it is sent. When used with TB it is best to turn off the PGP MDP text wrapping and leave

Mail lost in a time warp.

2000-09-16 Thread Christian Dysthe
Hello TBUDL, I was changing my CMOS battery and forgot to set time and date afterwards. I returned to Windows and started The Bat! and lost tons of mail since the time was set sometime in the future, and I have many folders set to expire mail based on how long it has been stored in the

How do I disable the attachment warning?

2000-09-16 Thread Christian Dysthe
Hello TBUDL, I was wondering how I can disable the warning I get every time I open an attachment. Yes, I know the warning is a good thing, but I do not have time for it (and I know what may infect my system anyway). TIA -- Best Regards, Christian Dysthe [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: How do I disable the attachment warning?

2000-09-16 Thread Juergen Frisch
Saturday, September 16, 2000, 08:55, Christian Dysthe wrote: I was wondering how I can disable the warning I get every time I open an attachment. Yes, I know the warning is a good thing, but I do not have time for it (and I know what may infect my system anyway). Hello Christian,

Re[2]: and a pgp question

2000-09-16 Thread Jason Thompson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Thomas and everyone else... TF It doesn't. That's Steve's point. Ah. I assumed the wrong convention of "should". My apologies. - -- Jason Thompson mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key ID: 0x3084BEC4[The Bat! v1.46c] -

Re: How do I disable the attachment warning?

2000-09-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Christian, On Sat, 16 Sep 2000 01:55:31 -0500 GMT (16/09/2000, 14:55 +0800 GMT), Christian Dysthe wrote: CD I was wondering how I can disable the warning I get every time I CD open an attachment. Yes, I know the warning is a good thing, but I CD do not have time for it (and I know

Re: Delete Attachments

2000-09-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Ming-Li, On Thu, 14 Sep 2000 05:31:09 -0700 GMT (14/09/2000, 20:31 +0800 GMT), Ming-Li wrote: Some of these messages are HTML, which is shown as an attachment, as I have auto-view disabled. So I routinely right-click on the attachment and delete it. It disappears from the folder view.

Re: Mail lost in a time warp.

2000-09-16 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Christian, On Friday, September 15, 2000 at 01:47:19 GMT -0500 (which was 11:47 PM where I live) witnesses say Christian Dysthe typed: snip unfortunate story of lost mail I do not know how it could be done, but it should be a way to make The Bat! not expire mail, or at least

Re[2]: Reasons why html mail shouldn't be used

2000-09-16 Thread Graham
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 n Friday, September 15, 2000, 12:29:09 AM, you wrote: JD TB! still doesn't support bold and underline because it's *plain* Hey - somebody else can put emphasis in plain text :-). *I* understood it just fine. I agree, but why, oh why, can't I

Re: Reasons why html mail shouldn't be used

2000-09-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Graham, On Sat, 16 Sep 2000 10:17:43 +0100 GMT (16/09/2000, 17:17 +0800 GMT), Graham wrote: G I agree, but why, oh why, can't I have the convenience of using G Trutype fonts?? I understand you can use TrueType as long as it's fixed width. ;-) But don't worry too much, in v2 you will be

Re: Mail lost in a time warp.

2000-09-16 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Christian, On 16 September 2000 at 01:47:19 GMT -0500 (which was 07:47 where I live) Christian Dysthe wrote and made these points on the subject of "Mail lost in a "time warp".": CD I do not know how it could be done, but it should be a way to

Re: Reasons why html mail shouldn't be used

2000-09-16 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Graham, On 16 September 2000 at 10:17:43 GMT +0100 (which was 10:17 where I live) Graham wrote and made these points on the subject of "Reasons why html mail shouldn't be used": Hey - somebody else can put emphasis in plain text :-). *I*

Re: Mail lost in a time warp.

2000-09-16 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Marck, On Saturday, September 16, 2000 at 10:58:42 GMT +0100 (which was 2:58 AM where I live) witnesses say Marck D. Pearlstone typed: You could, folder by folder, go through and "Browse deleted messages" to retrieve the missing messages (unless you have also compressed the

Re: Reasons why html mail shouldn't be used

2000-09-16 Thread Luca
16/09/2000, Marck D. Pearlstone: You can use variable pitch fonts by employing a registry hack (ask if you want it - I will publish it for you). I'd like to use smaller fonts (possibly variable pitch ones, I'm used to arial narrow) for column titles, particularly in the headers list pane

Re: Mail lost in a time warp.

2000-09-16 Thread Roel
Hi Januk On Sat, 16 Sep 2000 03:37:48 -0700GMT (which was 16/09/2000, 12:37 +0100GMT for me), you wrote: JA But the only way messages expire is if you purge the folder. Purging JA automatically compresses the folder as well. So... Not always: The 'purge on exit' option (in the

Re: Reasons why html mail shouldn't be used

2000-09-16 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 16 Sep 2000 12:56:32 +0200, Luca wrote: L I'd like to use smaller fonts (possibly variable pitch ones, I'm used L to arial narrow) for column titles, particularly in the headers list L pane (from, subject, etc). Is that possible? L I just

Re: Reasons why html mail shouldn't be used

2000-09-16 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Luca, On 16 September 2000 at 12:56:32 GMT +0200 (which was 11:56 where I live) Luca wrote and made these points on the subject of "Reasons why html mail shouldn't be used": L I'd like to use smaller fonts (possibly variable pitch ones,

Re: V2????

2000-09-16 Thread Jason Thompson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello zefram and everyone else... zwd Since I just subscribed to this list, could anyone please tell me zwd something about v2. is it currently under development or is it just a zwd planned project? or what will be the major changes in that new zwd

V2????

2000-09-16 Thread zefram
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: MD5 Since I just subscribed to this list, could anyone please tell me something about v2. is it currently under development or is it just a planned project? or what will be the major changes in that new version? regards marcus -BEGIN PGP

Re: attachments opening

2000-09-16 Thread John Phillips
Hello Thursday, September 14, 2000, 10:57:18 PM, you wrote: MF Hi! MF I've got the following problem with the Bat: MF Is there any way to -automatically- open attached ".msg"-files? We MF receive lots of "undeliverable"-mails in our support area and it's very MF annoying to open the message

Re: V2????

2000-09-16 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi zefram, On 16 September 2000 at 12:43:20 GMT +0200 (which was 11:43 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject of "V2": zwd Since I just subscribed to this list, could anyone please tell me zwd something about

Re[2]: Registered user features?

2000-09-16 Thread Östen Häggmark
I realize I may appear petty-minded here but...telling people you'll get things if you pay, and then not delivering them, that's called...well you know what it's called. :-) Also, a note that the trial version is fully functional would, at least for me, give a more favorable impression. The

Re: Registered user features?

2000-09-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Östen, On Sat, 16 Sep 2000 17:22:58 +0200 GMT (16/09/2000, 23:22 +0800 GMT), Östen Häggmark wrote: ÖH I realize I may appear petty-minded here but...telling people you'll ÖH get things if you pay, and then not delivering them, that's ÖH called...well you know what it's called. :-)

Re: V2????

2000-09-16 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Saturday, September 16, 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since I just subscribed to this list, could anyone please tell me something about v2. is it currently under development or is it just a planned project? or what will be the major changes in that new version? some weeks ago

Re: Registered user features?

2000-09-16 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Östen, On 16 September 2000 at 17:22:58 GMT +0200 (which was 16:22 where I live) Östen Häggmark wrote and made these points on the subject of "Registered user features?": ÖH I realize I may appear petty-minded here but...telling people you'll ÖH

Re[2]: Registered user features?

2000-09-16 Thread Östen Häggmark
Oh, I don't think there was ever an intent to deceive here. No I don't think so either. I overreacted there, I apologize sincerly. I think that line is just one of those loose ends - some day it will be tied up, I'm sure. As earlier said - the one thing TB isn't lacking is features. --

Reply templates

2000-09-16 Thread BillG
More newbie questions.. 1) Can the numbering after the "Re" be turned off? I don't particularly care for the "Re[2]", "Re[3]", etc A simple "Re" is sufficient IMO. 2) The %Quotes macro puts the "" character on every non-blank line of the original text. I prefer to have the ""

Re: Reply templates

2000-09-16 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 16 Sep 2000 14:08:10 -0400, BillG wrote: B More newbie questions.. Yes. :-) B 1) Can the numbering after the "Re" be turned off? I don't particularly B care for the "Re[2]", "Re[3]", etc A simple "Re" is sufficient IMO. In your

Re[2]: Replying to your message dated Thursday, September 14, 2000, at 9:54 AM

2000-09-16 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Thomas! Saturday, September 16, 2000, 6:39:08 AM, you wrote: Spare me. :-( Even if I had an email client who could read this, I would not want to receive any emails with Flash components. For all those who support the idea of HTML in

Re: Reply templates

2000-09-16 Thread Tony Boom
This message: 16/09/2000 19:41 GMT. Hello BillG, A reminder of what BillG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on: 16 September 2000 at 14:08:10 GMT -0400 B 1) Can the numbering after the "Re" be turned off? I don't particularly B care for the "Re[2]", "Re[3]", etc A simple "Re" is sufficient

Re: Reply templates

2000-09-16 Thread Chuck Mattsen
On Saturday, September 16, 2000 at 1:42 PM or thereabouts, A . Curtis Martin wrote the following about Reply templates: B 2) The %Quotes macro puts the "" character on every non-blank B line of the original text. I prefer to have the "" character on B EVERY line of the included text, not just

Re: Reply templates

2000-09-16 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi BillG, On 16 September 2000 at 14:08:10 GMT -0400 (which was 19:08 where I live) BillG wrote and made these points on the subject of "Reply templates": B 1) Can the numbering after the "Re" be turned off? I don't B particularly care for

Re: Reply templates

2000-09-16 Thread BillG
Chuck Mattsen wrote: I think I'm misunderstanding either the question/stated desire here or your response. If you reply to this message, I think you'll see a paragraph starting with I think ... followed by a blank line, then another quoted paragraph starting with If you

Re: The Bat PDAs

2000-09-16 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Saturday, September 16, 2000, Benoit Darcy wrote: Is there any chance to see a next release of The Bat! that handles mobile devices like PocketPC or PalmComputing platforms (built-in function or conduit application dedicated to mail synchronization for example). Yes :-)) Stefan

Re: Replying to your message dated Thursday, September 14, 2000, at 9:54 AM

2000-09-16 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 16 Sep 2000 20:45:42 +0200, Dierk Haasis wrote: snip DH Can anybody tell me how humans survived so long without all this - DH on normal paper with nothing else but a pen or pencil? E-mail has little to do with survival. It has more to do

Re: Reply templates

2000-09-16 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 16 Sep 2000 20:13:24 +0100, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: B 2) The %Quotes macro puts the "" character on every non-blank line B of the original text. I prefer to have the "" character on EVERY B line of the included text, not just the ones

Re: Reply templates

2000-09-16 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 16 Sep 2000 13:58:20 -0500, Chuck Mattsen wrote: CM I think the original question was how to get that blank line to show CM the quotation marker, as well, rather than remain blank ... your CM answer seems to say that it does, but on my end

New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread Karin Spaink
Since I don't like the way that my fave e-mail program Eudora is heading, I decided to try The Bat for a while. It looks very much like the mail client I might switch to, but after fiddling with it for a while - and checking the FAQ and the help files - I still have a couple of

Registration and Version 2

2000-09-16 Thread BillG
Hi All. I will need to register my copy of TB! soon. I'm concerned that version 2 will come out right after I pay to register version 1.x. Does TB! have any history of allowing free upgrades? Or will I have to pay more money when version 2 comes out? Thanks, Bill Grant --

Re: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Karin, On Saturday, September 16, 2000 at 00:29:40 GMT +0200 (which was 3:29 PM where I live) witnesses say Karin Spaink typed: I decided to try The Bat for a while. Welcome. It looks very much like the mail client I might switch to, but after fiddling with it for a while - and

Re: Registration and Version 2

2000-09-16 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi BillG, On 16 September 2000 at 18:40:06 GMT -0400 (which was 23:40 where I live) BillG wrote and made these points on the subject of "Registration and Version 2": B I will need to register my copy of TB! soon. I'm concerned that B version 2

Re: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread Oliver Sturm
Hi Karin Spaink, On Sunday, September 17, 2000 at 12:29:40 AM you wrote: 1. If you move your cursor down in the window in which you are editing your mail (e.g. move it down to the next empty line), it goes down but stays in the same column (read: horizontal axis) and doesn't go to the

Re: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Karin, On 16 September 2000 at 00:29:40 GMT +0200 (which was 23:29 where I live) Karin Spaink wrote and made these points on the subject of "New user, lotsa questions": KS 1. If you move your cursor down in the window in which you are KS editing

Re[2]: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread Karin Spaink
Thanks for the replies I have been getting so for. They are helpful and allow me to understand both the progam an dthe programmer's goals more clearly, and thus help me to make up my mind. First of all, new questions: 1. Why does my reply to Januk gets garbled in the Subject line and suddenly

Re: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread Steve Lamb
On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 12:29:40AM +0200, Karin Spaink wrote: 1. If you move your cursor down in the window in which you are editing your mail (e.g. move it down to the next empty line), it goes down but stays in the same column (read: horizontal axis) and doesn't go to the beginning of the

Re: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread Steve Lamb
On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 02:36:13AM +0200, Karin Spaink wrote: 1. Why does my reply to Januk gets garbled in the Subject line and suddenly gets "Re[2]: etc" instead of your standard "Re: etc"? TB! loves to count replies for some reason. You can turn that off in the templates. The exact

Re[2]: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread Karin Spaink
On 17-09-2000 at 01:27, Marck D. Pearlstone kindly wrote: Hi Karin, KS 1. If you move your cursor down in the window in which you are KS editing your mail (e.g. move it down to the next empty line), it KS goes down but stays in the same column Correct. This is not a bug. This is TB's

Re: Registration and Version 2

2000-09-16 Thread Chuck Mattsen
On Saturday, September 16, 2000 at 5:40 PM or thereabouts, BillG wrote the following about Registration and Version 2: B I will need to register my copy of TB! soon. I'm concerned that B version 2 will come out right after I pay to register version B 1.x. Does TB! have any history of allowing

Virtual folder

2000-09-16 Thread Vladimir Mincev
Hello friends, You have to make some things clear to me... When I open virtual folder (by double-clicking on Mail Ticker) when still receiving mail, why does Mail Ticker still showing messages (new ones)? How can I (when Virtual folder is opened) all new incoming mail send directly in Virtual

Re: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread Steve Lamb
On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 02:56:33AM +0200, Karin Spaink wrote: Ah, but I don't like pitcvhed fomts to begin with. And as I told Jurek: it feels as if somebdy is hammering it in. You _will_ have fixed fomts and even if you find your way around them. we will still make your message editor act

Re: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 16 Sep 2000 17:47:59 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: SL TB! loves to count replies for some reason. You can turn that off in SL the templates. The exact macro eludes me at the moment. Again, on SL Linux, not Windows. That's %SINGLERE snip SL See,

Re: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread Nick Andriash
On September 16, 2000, at 5:56:33 PM, Karin Spaink Wrote: I don't want to have each and every header... I just would love to have a general overview. "The Bat" folder 3 new, Swans folder 6 new. etc... That feature is one I truly enjoy with TB!... one quick look at my Folder Tree, and I can

Re: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 16 Sep 2000 17:35:12 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: snip SL This is free caret mode. There is no way to turn it off and no, it SL isn't a bug. I'm sure at least half a dozen people have answered SL stating that it isn't a bug, that it cannot be

Re: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Karin, On 17 September 2000 at 02:56:33 GMT +0200 (which was 01:56 where I live) Karin Spaink wrote and made these points on the subject of "New user, lotsa questions": in plain text, a paragraph needs a clear line to be clearly at an end.

Re: Virtual folder

2000-09-16 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Vladimir, On 17 September 2000 at 01:52:23 GMT +0200 (which was 00:52 where I live) Vladimir Mincev wrote and made these points on the subject of "Virtual folder": VM How can I (when Virtual folder is opened) all new incoming mail VM send

Re: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 17 Sep 2000 02:56:33 +0200, Karin Spaink wrote: KS Jurek answered that one. It's old, imported mail. Something got KS fucked up in the conversion,. New mail looks ok. ^^ moderator hat on Since this is an international group with

Re: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread Steve Lamb
On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 08:15:58PM -0500, A . Curtis Martin wrote: This is another thing that I have been indicating to you. In windows, the basic behaviour of most editors is really standard. This is why TB!'s editor is a real 'culture shocker' for those who are used to using different

Re: RFC gurus? TB trashes attachments

2000-09-16 Thread tracer
Hello Oliver Sturm, On Fri, 15 Sep 2000 19:39:46 +0200 GMT your local time, which was Saturday, September 16, 2000, 12:39:46 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Oliver Sturm wrote: Hi there, I received some messages recently created with a version of Outlook. They contained one attachment each

Re: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 16 Sep 2000 18:38:08 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: SL That is the Microsoft standard, not /A/ standard. The origin of this behaviour that is present in most Windows based editors that may have reason to use is pretty much besides the point. The

Re[2]: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread Mark R Harding
A., Regarding your message dated: 17 September 2000... ACM I personally do like the free caret interface myself. Also, for me, ACM TB!'s editor took some time to get accustomed to. It was a period of ACM adjustment and giving and taking. The end result has been that the ACM shortcomings for me

The Bat! - bug report

2000-09-16 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello The Bat! developers, I'm using The Bat! Version 1.46c Serial Number 14F4B4B2 under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 and would like to report a bug The bug description: If a signed PGP message contains TAB characters, TB converts these

Re: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread Karin Spaink
At 17:47 16-09-2000 -0700, Steve Lamb kindly wrote: On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 02:36:13AM +0200, Karin Spaink wrote: 1. Why does my reply to Januk gets garbled in the Subject line and suddenly gets "Re[2]: etc" instead of your standard "Re: etc"? TB! loves to count replies for some

Re: RFC gurus? TB trashes attachments

2000-09-16 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi tracer, On 16 September 2000 at 00:23:38 GMT +0700 (which was 18:23 where I live) tracer wrote and made these points on the subject of "RFC gurus? TB trashes attachments": This is a multi-part message in MIME format. t

Re: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mark, On 17 September 2000 at 02:58:52 GMT +0100 (which was 02:58 where I live) Mark R Harding wrote and made these points on the subject of "New user, lotsa questions": MRH In TB!, I find the behaviour of the tab key to be almost random. MRH

Re[2]: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread Mark R Harding
Steve, Regarding your message dated: 17 September 2000... SL That is the Microsoft standard, not /A/ standard. There is a big SL difference. AFAIK the CUA (a standard) defines what keystrokes do, not editor SL behavior. There is a difference. True enough but given that TB! runs under

Re: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread Karin Spaink
At 18:05 16-09-2000 -0700, Steve Lamb kindly wrote: On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 02:56:33AM +0200, Karin Spaink wrote: Ah, but I don't like pitcvhed fomts to begin with. And as I told Jurek: it feels as if somebdy is hammering it in. You _will_ have fixed fomts and even if you find your way

Re: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 17 Sep 2000 02:58:52 +0100, Mark R Harding wrote: snip MRH What does perplex me still is how exactly the tab key works. My usual MRH experience from both Windows and Unix editors is that the tab key MRH indents the cursor position (either

Re: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread David Tod Sigafoos
Hello Karin, Just a quick note .. As you are probably seeing there is a lot of 'we know everything' and there is only ONE way to do things .. yada yada yada. Try to let these notes go by .. just sympathize. The real thing is to look at The Bat and all of its features. I have moved to The Bat

Re: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 16 Sep 2000 19:43:34 -0700, David Tod Sigafoos wrote: DTS As you are probably seeing there is a lot of 'we know everything' and DTS there is only ONE way to do things .. yada yada yada. Try to let DTS these notes go by .. just sympathize.

Re: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Karin, On Saturday, September 16, 2000 at 04:41:42 GMT +0200 (which was 7:41 PM where I live) witnesses say Karin Spaink typed: 'Cept that I don;'t always read on the spot, and then new massages get added to old (unread) messages. That's where new and old start getting diffuse. I

Re: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread Karin Spaink
At 02:31 17-09-2000 +0100, Marck D. Pearlstone kindly wrote: Karin Spaink wrote: [tabs and paragraphs] KS I won't repeat myself, but we're talking cultural differences KS here. No we're not. These are *technical* issues regarding how the *editor* can distinguish the next *line* from the

Re: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Karin, On 17 September 2000 at 04:57:18 GMT +0200 (which was 03:57 where I live) Karin Spaink wrote and made these points on the subject of "New user, lotsa questions": No we're not. These are *technical* issues regarding how the

Re: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Mark, On Saturday, September 16, 2000 at 04:25:39 GMT +0100 (which was 8:25 PM where I live) witnesses say Mark R Harding typed: To think that all this time other people knew what was going only and I only had to ask... sheesh... don't I feel better?! As I said in one of my posts

Re: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread Karin Spaink
At 19:54 16-09-2000 -0700, Januk Aggarwal kindly wrote: Hello Karin, 'Cept that I don;'t always read on the spot, and then new massages get added to old (unread) messages. That's where new and old start getting diffuse. I don;t want that. I want my mailer to say that I've recieved do

Re: Saving old mail?

2000-09-16 Thread Jack LaRosa
Hello Thomas, On Fri, 15 Sep 2000 11:23:42 +0800 GMT your local time, which was Thursday, September 14, 2000, 10:23:42 PM (GMT-6) my local time, you wrote: TF Hi Jack, TF On Thu, 14 Sep 2000 19:21:32 -0500GMT (15/09/2000, 08:21 +0800GMT), TF Jack LaRosa wrote: JL I just looked at the

Re[2]: New user, lotsa questions

2000-09-16 Thread ztrader
On Saturday, September 16, 2000, 7:57:18 PM, you wrote: KS Please do not use language like this here. KS In that case, please inform subscribers via the majardomo welcome message. Most people do not need this spelled out for them, they just don't do it as a matter of course in a polite group.

Replying to your message dated Saturday, September 16, 2000, at 4:27 PM

2000-09-16 Thread Wayne Black
Hello Marck, Saturday, September 16, 2000, 4:27:18 PM, you wrote: KS 4. Although The Bat claims to have "HTML auto view" and while I KS have Options -- HTML auto view on, I get to see all the html-mail KS as plain text, tags included. MDP Hang-on ... with tags? You mean like HTML ...