On Tuesday, September 7, 2004 @ 4:01:54 PM, Ludovic LE MOAL wrote:
[snips]
Ludovic I didn't know that too. How can I bounce a mail ?
It's just another method of adding to used bandwidth.
--
cheers, Mic (reply address works)
Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs,
On Tuesday, September 7, 2004 @ 11:18:16 AM, Kevin Amazon wrote:
[snips]
Is there any way to change the size of the icons (glyphs) in TB! v3?
Even when I use a glyphs.bmp file, the icons are spread too far apart
and they take up too much screen space. Has anybody figured out how to
return
On Sunday, September 5, 2004 @ 2:03:44 PM, Allister Jenks wrote:
[snips]
Allister I know many TBUDLers are unhappy with the affair (and some aren't), but
Allister has there been *any* response from RIT about all this?
If you want a 50-50 chance of:
a) no reply at all, or
b) a smartarse reply
On Sunday, September 5, 2004 @ 5:08:48 PM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
[snips]
Same thing that makes the new release v3 and not v2.1X - marketing and a
belief that people will believe anything you tell them...
Alexander I'd suggest the two of you start a new list ranting at ritlabs forever,
On Sunday, September 5, 2004 @ 8:53:10 PM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
[snips]
Isn't it wonderful that you, too, are allowed an opinion. Of course, not
everyone will share it.
Alexander You are allowed an opinion but we've read it at least 10 times today,
Alexander yesterday and the day before,
On Sunday, September 5, 2004 @ 7:23:42 AM, Michael L. Wilson wrote:
[snips]
Michael What makes The Bat a natural email system. Can someone please explain
Michael what this phrase means and why it is attached to The Bat?
Same thing that makes the new release v3 and not v2.1X - marketing and a
On Sunday, September 5, 2004 @ 9:09:36 AM, Michael L. Wilson wrote:
[snips]
JN I read somewhere that TB3 has customizable toolbars. I cannot find a
JN place to change the icons. Can this be done?
Michael What you actually read was that version 3 will someday, in the far,
Michael far, future
On Sunday, September 5, 2004 @ 1:15:08 PM, Mary Bull wrote:
[snips]
Mary It loads fast, also, and--whether coincidence or not--my mails are
Mary coming down faster from the Mail Dispatcher, too.
How are you measuring that?
--
cheers, Mic (reply address works)
If you would be a real seeker
On Sunday, September 5, 2004 @ 2:05:39 AM, DZ-Jay wrote:
[snips]
DZ-Jay Its not that it is such a large programming effort to change
DZ-Jay the UI of the application and that those efforts could be diverted to
DZ-Jay debugging the application. The point is that focusing on the UI,
DZ-Jay
On Sunday, September 5, 2004 @ 1:32:58 PM, Mary Bull wrote:
[snips]
Mary It loads fast, also, and--whether coincidence or not--my mails
Mary are coming down faster from the Mail Dispatcher, too.
MicCullen How are you measuring that?
Mary Subjectively, of course. Didn't put a stopwatch on it.
On Friday, September 3, 2004 @ 5:06:10 PM, Ian A. White wrote:
[snips]
TD You ready for the best part? I didn't send anyone at RitLabs an email.
Ian Something is screwy there. I received an e-mail from someone there
Ian letting me know they would be out of the office! I have never heard of
Ian
On Friday, September 3, 2004 @ 8:31:32 PM, Mary Bull wrote:
[snips]
Mary I hope that 9Val will soon edit the default.msl
Mary file to enclose all handles in colons there.
No offence to anyone, but I'd prefer they fixed bugs rather than play with
toys that aren't much use in the real world,
G'day tbudl,
It seems Ritlabs are - despite the furore of the last few days - still far
more interested in being smartarses (sorry if that's a proscribed word, it's
not in Australia) than looking after customers.
It's not only the staff they've got replying to the beta list who think this
whole
On Saturday, September 4, 2004 @ 8:33:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snips]
Ah yes. I can stay with a non-supported version
admin Then you don't get any support through this list then? Oh dear...
Unofficial support isn't the same thing, as everyone knows. I get far more
support on using the
On Saturday, September 4, 2004 @ 5:38:28 AM, Leif Gregory wrote:
[snips]
=B0
MM What does the BO is supposed to be?
Leif Baad Odor :grin:
But these are fresh trout, unless the mods have been asleep for a while!
--
cheers, Mic (reply address works)
Inanimate objects are
On Saturday, September 4, 2004 @ 9:48:58 AM, Chris wrote:
[snips]
Here's the response I eventually got off them after emailing sales:
Chris Well, at least you got a reply to your email.
I emailed them three times in three days, so maybe that had something to do
with it.
Chris I only got a
On Saturday, September 4, 2004 @ 1:24:21 PM, Doug Weller wrote:
[snips]
Doug Are there many examples of getting refunds if you bought something 3
Doug months before an upgrade/new model?
Are you asking me? Your lack of quotes makes it hard to tell.
If you are, there's ANY number of examples in
On Thursday, September 2, 2004 @ 7:43:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snips]
It's been two days now and I've not had anything.
admin And two emails, one yestreday am and one last night have gone
admin completely unanswered.
Likewise.
admin Anyone any suggestions as to what I can do?
Hope
On Thursday, September 2, 2004 @ 8:55:42 PM, Mark Partous wrote:
[snips]
admin And two emails, one yestreday am and one last night have gone
admin completely unanswered.
MicCullen Likewise.
admin Anyone any suggestions as to what I can do?
MicCullen Hope seems to be the only thing...
Mark Is
On Thursday, September 2, 2004 @ 9:56:34 PM, MikeD (3) wrote:
[snips]
DWG Top posting good. Bottom posting annoying!
MikeD I think we are in the minority, thought sigh
Yes, linear thought is just SO 20th century :-)
--
cheers, Mic (reply address works) This whole mad cow thing has me
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 @ 11:06:54 AM, Roman Katzer wrote:
[snips]
Roman It's hardly a year since version 2 came out and I was wondering why there
Roman were so few minor releases in the last weeks. Now RITLabs is releasing
Roman version 3 without functioning IMAP support in V2
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 @ 4:06:51 PM, Mark Partous wrote:
[snips]
MicCullen Reading the beta list is reasonably entertaining at the moment
Mark No it isn't. Most comments are showing how low reasoning power can get. :-(
If you're a blind defender of the appalling way that this process
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 @ 6:59:51 PM, Mark Partous wrote:
[snips]
Does it still top post?
MD Unfortunately it does. But thankfully somebody came up with a solution to
MD that and this is what I've been using for many months without any issues:
Mark Does it still uses loads of memory
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 @ 7:47:03 PM, MAU wrote:
[snips]
As a new user who bought my v2 licence on 20th August, try *very*
annoyed.
MAU I am quite sure Ritlabs will consider that fact. A 10 days old user
MAU should not be charged for the upgrade.
But where's the cut-off point? Should
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 @ 6:36:56 PM, Martyn Drake wrote:
[snips]
TB! is just a huge let down now :( I hope Ritlabs go bust, nobody
should pay for TB!3, it just isn't worth the money.
Martyn I think that's a bit harsh - I wouldn't wish anybody to be unemployed.
Martyn People do have
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 @ 8:03:43 PM, Paul Jansen wrote:
[snips]
Paul I amusing V3
Fascinating typo. (Assuming it is that, of course :-)
--
cheers, Mic (reply address works)
Get all the fools on your side and you can be elected to anything.
Frank Dane
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 @ 8:29:31 PM, Nick Dutton wrote:
[snips]
Nick I'd bet that this is where their real money comes from, not in keeping
Nick a (vocal) few of the faithful happy. They are a business after all.
But businesses should have ethics, should they not? And not keeping
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 @ 10:01:01 PM, MAU wrote:
[snips]
How Ritlabs can believe that somebody will pay more expensive for Pro
version 3 without any explanation of differences with Personal version
?
MAU The is still honest people out there.
That is entirely irrelevant.
--
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 @ 10:37:01 PM, Thorvald Neumann wrote:
[snips]
But businesses should have ethics, should they not?
Thorvald Welcome to the real world... ;)
I'm on a bit of a jihad against the really stupid use of smilies, LOL, etc. -
can you tell me what's so funny about that
On Thursday, September 2, 2004 @ 6:21:01 AM, MAU wrote:
[snips]
But where's the cut-off point?
MAU How long is a piece of rope? How many grains make a bunch of rice?
My point exactly. Seeing as Ritlabs are maintaining their usual communication
policy (ie nothing useful, no help, no answers to
At 11:25 [GMT+0200] on Saturday August 21 (actual time - 5:25pm on Saturday in
Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
[snips]
Marc Is it possible to create HTML templates?
No, which is a PITA.
But we've got smileys, which is clearly what you want in an email client
rather than actual
At 23:03 [GMT+0200] on Sunday August 22 (actual time - 5:03am on Monday in
Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
[snips]
Marc Is it possible to create HTML templates?
No, which is a PITA.
But we've got smileys, which is clearly what you want in an email client
rather than actual
At 23:32 [GMT+0200] on Sunday August 22 (actual time - 5:32am on Monday in
Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
[snips]
But we've got smileys, which is clearly what you want in an email client
rather than actual functionality...
Alexander Email != HTML
As a general rule, I agree. A year
At 16:04 [GMT+0200] on Thursday August 12 (actual time - 10:04pm on Thursday
in Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
[snips]
Hi Dan,
Google has a translation tool. Heres the link to view his site
translated into english
http://tinyurl.com/4pltp
Gaijin I hope, the German to English
At 01:58 [GMT+0200] on Wednesday August 11 (Actual time - 07:58am on
Wednesday in Perth, Western Australia) you wrote:
[snips]
Roelof %Wrapped='%QInclude(YourTime)'
Roelof The QInclude macro calls the QT, the Wrapped macro wraps the output of
Roelof the QT according to your wrapping settings.
G'day tbudl,
G'day all.
One of our fellow list members kindly provided me with the below setup.
What it outputs currently is the following:
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, at 19:17:07 [GMT+0800] (which was 21:17:07 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
What I'd like it to give me is:
At 21:17
G'day all.
One of our fellow list members kindly provided me with the below setup.
What it outputs currently is the following:
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, at 19:17:07 [GMT+0800] (which was 21:17:07 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
What I'd like it to give me is:
At 21:17 [GMT+1000] on Monday
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, at 22:38:27 [GMT+0200] (which was Tue, 4:38 [GMT+800]
Perth, Western Australia) you wrote:
[snips]
Alexander A late reply, but nevertheless... I just found a rather nice monospaced
Alexander font in TrueType format - its called Monaco and can be found here:
Alexander
On Saturday, August 7, 2004 @ 7:44:09 AM, Darrin Rich wrote:
[snips]
rg Can't I highlight text in a received mssg then choose to forward to
rg reply to it and only have the highlight text quoted
Darrin Highlight the text and hit the F4 key.
Can this be done from a message opened from the
G'day tbudl,
I've switched to using MicroEd as my composition editor, and I'm slowly
getting used to the revolting look of non-proportional fonts.
But I've got a format problem. If I want to produce a list of items like this:
Item
Item
Item
It's OK as long as I don't need to edit ANYTHING in
On Wednesday, August 4, 2004 @ 6:49:23 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
[snips]
But I've got a format problem. If I want to produce a list of items like this:
Item
Item
Item
It's OK as long as I don't need to edit ANYTHING in it, because if I do, it
immediately moves to:
Item Item Item
On Wednesday, July 28, 2004 @ 5:29:25 AM, 9Val wrote:
[snips]
9Val And one more - Smart wrapping of quoted text which doesn't work in
9Val Windows editor.
Yep, that's another big plus. Now, if they can just give the option of
proportional fonts...
--
cheers, Mic (reply address works)
A
On Wednesday, July 28, 2004 @ 7:49:26 PM, 9Val wrote:
[snips]
MicCullen Now, if they can just give the option of
9Val
9Valwho? :)
THEM!! You know, them. Man, how much clearer could I be? THEM.*
MicCullen proportional fonts...
9Val
G'day tbudl,
Word wrapping - I can't seem to get it sorted in TheBat, after a decade of no problems
with Agent.
I'd like my lines to wrap at about 80 characters, but can't seem to get it to happen.
I'm using the Plain Text (Windows) editor as I HATE non-proportional fonts, even
though I'd
On Tuesday, July 27, 2004 @ 8:15:04 PM, Allie Martin wrote:
[snips]
I'd like my lines to wrap at about 80 characters, but can't seem
to get it to happen. I'm using the Plain Text (Windows) editor as I
HATE non-proportional fonts, even though I'd like some of the
features of the Micro-Ed
On Tuesday, July 27, 2004 @ 8:17:38 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
[snips]
Marck Dear M,
Sounds like James Bond :-)
Marck @27-Jul-2004, 19:55 +0800 (27-Jul 12:55 UK time) M i c C u l l e n
Marck said to tbudl:
I'd like my lines to wrap at about 80 characters, but can't
seem to get
On Tuesday, July 27, 2004 @ 9:32:28 PM, St - Musaic.Net wrote:
[snips]
St TB does not react to Windows Show Desktop try Windows-
St button + M and see for yourself.
What do you mean: does not react? For me, doing that minimises everything
(including TB) and I see the desktop.
--
On Tuesday, July 27, 2004 @ 9:40:01 PM, Allie Martin wrote:
[snips]
I'll try it for a few days and see how I go. Sure is ugly though.
Allie It's the fonts that are often ugly.
Ain't that the truth!!! As a journalist, I tend to worry about HOW it looks
as well as the information contained,
On Sunday, July 25, 2004 @ 11:12:28 PM, Bill McCarthy wrote:
[snips]
Bill It's fairly simple to set up, but I don't think there are any
Bill directions in the help file.
Making it a rare beast indeed...
--
cheers, Mic (reply address works)
I think Superman should go on the Larry King show
On Tuesday, July 13, 2004 @ 1:10:18 PM, Ben Allen wrote:
[snips]
Gary Should have a button though, or some preset key. I used
Gary ctrl+j, which was park. I never use park, but thats just me.
Gary Who doesn't use mark as junk at least 5 times a day?
Ben Er.. me
Me too, actually - SpamPal
On Tuesday, July 13, 2004 @ 10:01:09 PM, Douglas Hinds wrote:
[snips]
Douglas Are there any valid reasons to upgrade? (I have no intention of
Douglas sending html mail).
I used to think that too, but there are times when it's incredibly useful to be able
to do so.
Example - I'm a sports
On Monday, July 12, 2004 @ 1:34:35 PM, Allister Jenks wrote:
[snips]
MB In defense of RitLabs: the improvements that are being made in The
MB Bat! are coming along so rapidly that any Help file would soon be
MB obsolete. I consider that I am running an obsolete version, and I have
MB the latest
On Friday, July 9, 2004 @ 6:26:57 PM, Roelof Otten wrote:
[snips]
Zonnet Better yet, have younoticed that the copy is made the moment you attach
Zonnet the file? If it is attached you can not change it anymore by changing the
Zonnet original. You will have to delete it and re-attach.
MIC Yeah,
On Monday, July 5, 2004 @ 8:27:25 AM, Roelof Otten wrote:
[snips]
MIC With emails to the tbudl list, I've got two filters:
MIC 1) emails addressed to the list are sorted into the TheBat! folder, and
Roelof That's a straightforward filter, that should work.
Yep.
MIC 2) emails addressed to the
On Wednesday, July 7, 2004 @ 11:11:50 PM, Zonnet wrote:
[snips]
MicCullen Attachments should stay exactly where they were before being
Zonnet attached - ie, where I put them to begin with.
Zonnet The original stay were it was and a copy of the send attachment is stored
Zonnet by the BAT.
Yes,
On Wednesday, July 7, 2004 @ 9:10:00 PM, subscriber2list wrote:
[snips]
subscriber2list Anyway, the above description of
subscriber2list your steps worked great; my question is ... how does one back-out of
subscriber2list the end result, i.e., return to where ALL messages are listed again
On Wednesday, July 7, 2004 @ 11:03:23 AM, Mary Bull wrote:
[snips]
AT Any ideas? Maybe I just need to wait for a later Bat version?
Mary This is going to need the attention of both Leif and 9Val, in my
Mary opinion.
Which was one of the major worries voiced at the start of this whole thing
On Tuesday, July 6, 2004 @ 9:12:33 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
[snips]
When I read lots of mails in a row, some read msgs are still marked as
unread afterwards. Is this a bug?
Marck It would depend on the Mark messages read after... setting in the
Marck account properties. If you skim a
On Wednesday, July 7, 2004 @ 12:09:29 AM, Roelof Otten wrote:
[snips]
BH But all the attachments that I myself send are also saved in that
BH folder?! I don't want them there, I have them elsewhere on my PC,
BH and I don't see why TB should save them on the hard disk at all.
Roelof That's
G'day all,
A question to which I have not been able to find an answer. (One of the MANY that I
would have no answers to if it were not for this list, as the documentation is
seriously sub-standard, especially given what a terrific program it is.)
I filter all of my tbudl email into one folder.
On Sunday, July 4, 2004 @ 11:39:55 PM, Roelof Otten wrote:
[snips]
MIC What I would like to do is have the program automatically
MIC move the parked messages into the folder after a certain length
MIC of time. (Say, five days.)
Roelof You can't do that automatically, however you could do that
G'day all.
He's what I would have thought was a simple one, but I can't seem to get it to work.
With emails to the tbudl list, I've got two filters:
1) emails addressed to the list are sorted into the TheBat! folder, and
2) emails addressed to the list AND sent by me are sorted into the
On Wednesday, June 30, 2004 @ 6:31:15 PM, Terry wrote:
[snips]
Terry I'd like for the Connection Centre to only appear when I want it to.
OptionsPreferencesGeneralDisplay Connection Centre - Hide
(First option under the check boxes)
--
cheers, Mic (reply address works)
You can't think
On Friday, June 11, 2004 @ 9:14:46 PM, Charles M. Gerungan wrote:
[snips]
Charles Not trying to hijack the thread, but I think something nice (that's
Charles also related) is if it would be possible to save your reply in the
Charles same folder as the message you're replying to.
Which is what
G'day all.
I'm a LONG-term Agent user, (bought it when it was still .99 beta, the best part of a
decade ago), but I finally got too fed up with it, so I went looking for a different
client, and I've ended up here.
And despite the clear advantages that The Bat! has over Agent, I'm missing some
On Monday, April 26, 2004 @ 11:46:04 PM, Roelof Otten wrote:
[snips]
MIC In Agent, one-click browsing allows the use of the spacebar to move to the next
unread
MIC message - can this be done in The Bat!?
You can use Ctrl+] and Ctrl+[ to move to the next/previous unread
message. Though this
On Monday, April 26, 2004 @ 11:33:51 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
[snips]
MicCullen Threading - is it possible to get the program to only
MicCullen expand threads with unread messages in them?
No - it's all or nothing. I can imagine that you get a lot of
seconders when you add an itme to the
67 matches
Mail list logo
