Hi
Is there a way to log the interaction between The Bat! and GnuPG for
debugging purposes?
TB! fails to decrypt some of the encrypted messages I receive, giving
as it's error message a portion of GnuPG's output (but not the part
saying what went wrong). If use GnuPG on the command line
Hi
Are these issues with Draft messages and GnuPG encryption that exist in
my TB! Version 4.0.38 still present in the latest release? Or have
Ritlabs fixed them?
1. Messages configured to be encrypted on completion are not
encrypted when saved/autosaved as drafts.
2. Messages
Hi
On Friday 28 November 2014 at 1:05:50 PM, in
mid:827739595.20141128130550@my_localhost, MFPA wrote:
Hi
On Monday 24 November 2014 at 1:20:45 AM, in
mid:378235854.20141124012045@my_localhost, MFPA
wrote:
When sending a GnuPG-encrypted message that has BCC
recipients, my TB! version
the account log contains
entries like:-
FETCH - Root: generated by avast! antivirus for SSL
scanning, avast! Mail Scanner, avast! Mail Scanner Root
But my question in the current thread was about (GnuPG) encrypting
messages that have BCC recipients. My TB
Hi
On Monday 24 November 2014 at 1:20:45 AM, in
mid:378235854.20141124012045@my_localhost, MFPA wrote:
When sending a GnuPG-encrypted message that has BCC
recipients, my TB! version (4.0.38) simply includes all
recipients, including those on the BCC line, in the
encryption list of a single
, 28 Nov 2014 13:05:50 + GMT (28-Nov-14, 20:05 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
Hi
On Monday 24 November 2014 at 1:20:45 AM, in
mid:378235854.20141124012045@my_localhost, MFPA wrote:
When sending a GnuPG-encrypted message that has BCC
recipients, my TB! version (4.0.38) simply includes all
Hi
When sending a GnuPG-encrypted message that has BCC recipients, my TB!
version (4.0.38) simply includes all recipients, including those on
the BCC line, in the encryption list of a single outgoing message. The
identity of the BCCs is potentially leaked to each other and to the
other
Hi
On Wednesday 28 November 2012 at 1:27:22 AM, in
mid:619801379.20121128012722@my_localhost, MFPA wrote:
some of the other options I had also may prove helpful
^
missed
(-:
--
Best regards
MFPA
Hi
On Wednesday 28 November 2012 at 1:27:22 AM, in
mid:619801379.20121128012722@my_localhost, MFPA wrote:
But I may get around to some further testing with
GPG-agent/pinentry, and trying to get it to listen to
Keepass.
Including {APPACTIVATE pinentry.exe} was the answer to this
Hello MFPA,
On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 you wrote:
--SNIP---
M If I switch to GnuPG 2.0.19, the problem goes away. (But is replaced by
M a non-TB!-related issue in that GnuPG 2.x requires passphrase entry
M via pinentry.exe, which will not accept the output
Hi
On Tuesday 27 November 2012 at 2:27:46 PM, in
mid:1789054650.20121127082...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
Not knowing how familiar you are with KeePass, please
forgive my presumption to suggest you try the
{DELAY=} where I believe xx represents
microseconds. This command
Hi
On Sunday 25 November 2012 at 10:42:06 AM, in
mid:1037652155.20121125114...@gmx.de, Raymund Tump
wrote:
I'm using TB with GnuPG 2.1.0 that works just fine.
Maybe time for an upgrade?
On Sunday 25 November 2012 at 1:57:28 PM, in
mid:1209767312.20121125135728@my_localhost, MFPA wrote
Hi
On Sunday 25 November 2012 at 10:42:06 AM, in
mid:1037652155.20121125114...@gmx.de, Raymund Tump wrote:
Hi MFPA,
Anybody else tried TB! v5.2.2 and found it doesn't
work with GnuPG (1.4.12)?
Wow, nobody else has tried 5.2.2?
I'm using TB with GnuPG 2.1.0 that works just fine.
Maybe
Hi
On Saturday 24 November 2012 at 11:19:38 PM, in
mid:1437496633.20121124151...@gmx.com, Melissa Reese wrote:
I used TB v5.2.2 for a short while on this computer,
but due to one particular annoyance I couldn't sort out
(nothing to do with GnuPG integration), I've gone back
to using
Guten Morgen,
Anybody else tried TB! v5.2.2 and found it doesn't work
with GnuPG (1.4.12)?
Sorry, working fine here.
--
MfG,
Altomailto:a...@treadstone79.de
pgpKegbmNGpmt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Current
Hi
On Monday 19 November 2012 at 8:21:59 PM, in
mid:1866520233.20121119202159@my_localhost, MFPA wrote:
Hi
Anybody else tried TB! v5.2.2 and found it doesn't work
with GnuPG (1.4.12)?
Wow, nobody else has tried 5.2.2?
--
Best regards
MFPAmailto:expires2
Hi
Anybody else tried TB! v5.2.2 and found it doesn't work with GnuPG
(1.4.12)?
When trying to sign or decrypt, there is no prompt to enter a
passphrase, and the operation fails claiming secret key not
available. One of the lines in the GnuPG window says gpg: can't
query passphrase in batch
Hi
On Tuesday 23 October 2012 at 12:35:16 PM, in
mid:1810488823.20121023133516@my_localhost, I wrote:
Can anybody who already runs The Bat! under Wine on
Linux tell me how to get TB! to use GnuPG? Is there a
way to get The Bat! under Wine to use the GnuPG already
present on my Linux
Hi
I'm thinking of switching my PC to Linux, and as I have been unable to
find a decent Linux email client, I am experimenting with using Wine
to run The Bat! on my Linux partition.
Can anybody who already runs The Bat! under Wine on Linux tell me how
to get TB! to use GnuPG? Is there a way
Hi
On Monday 14 December 2009 at 4:39:41 PM, in
mid:1571865792.20091214163...@srima.eu, Sean Rima wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
Hello Tbudl,
I am finding a problem, or is it my setup, with the
way that TheBat handles GnuPG encrypted or signed
emails. I have
finding a problem, or is it my setup, with the
way that TheBat handles GnuPG encrypted or signed
emails. I have my password timeout set to a long
time, and if I enter a folder which has 3 or 4
signed/encrypted messages, I am finding that I
have to enter my password most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello Tbudl,
I am finding a problem, or is it my setup, with the way that TheBat
handles GnuPG encrypted or signed emails. I have my password timeout
set to a long time, and if I enter a folder which has 3 or 4
signed/encrypted
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, at 13:17:18 [GMT +0100] (which was 14:17 where I
live) Mfpa wrote:
I would recommend a mailing list called PGPNET for practice and help
with openPGP encryption. Find it at Yahoo.
or:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PGP-Basics/
--
With kind regards,
Henk M. de Bruijn
to (hers). Does it automatically
select the key with the user id email address I've put
in the To field? It's a while since I've used
PGP/GnuPG but I seem to remember always being prompted
to select a recipient key.
When using PGP or GPG from within TB!, the keys are selected
automatically based
'Ello Carren,
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:27:21 +1200 (your time) you said:
...I have pointed to that via OpenPGP - Preferences- Files, but I'm
still getting the secret key not found message.
I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong...
I'm not sure either, but maybe the GnuPG Home directory isn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
On Thursday 30 July 2009 at 11:30:50 PM, in
mid:17710055785.20090731103...@xnet.co.nz, Carren Stuart wrote:
Hello
I've installed GnuPG and GnuPG Shell as the front-end
but I cannot get it to work with TB. I've created my
keys which I can
Hello MFPA,
Saturday, August 1, 2009, 12:17:18 AM, you wrote:
MFPA 1. do you have a secret key on your keyring for the email address the
MFPA message you are trying to encrypt is from?
Duh! I am SO stupid. I was trying to send email from a different email address
than the one I associated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
On Saturday 1 August 2009 at 2:16:52 AM, in
mid:615401584.20090801131...@xnet.co.nz, Carren Stuart wrote:
If I want to use that key with all email accounts, can
I add additional email addresses to the key?
Yes, you can add a user id for
to encrypt to (hers). Does it
automatically select the key with the user id email address I've put in the
To field? It's a while since I've used PGP/GnuPG but I seem to remember
always being prompted to select a recipient key.
Many thanks for all the help - much appreciated!
--
Carren
Using
Hello
I've installed GnuPG and GnuPG Shell as the front-end but I cannot get it to
work with TB. I've created my keys which I can see in the key manager, but when
I try to sign/encrypt an email I get a no secret key found message (or words
to that effect).
When I created the keys
'Ello Carren,
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:30:50 +1200 (your time) you said:
I've installed GnuPG and GnuPG Shell as the front-end
This isn't going to help you, but I tried to install it to take a look but
I'm afraid the GnuPG Shell installer doesn't find my GnuPG folder, even
though there's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thursday, July 30, 2009, 7:56:06 PM, Simon wrote in part:
I've installed GnuPG and GnuPG Shell as the front-end
S This isn't going to help you, but I tried to install it to take a look but
S I'm afraid the GnuPG Shell installer doesn't find my
Hello Simon,
Friday, July 31, 2009, 11:56:06 AM, you wrote:
Simon On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:30:50 +1200 (your time) you said:
I've installed GnuPG and GnuPG Shell as the front-end
Simon If you're interested, the best (only IMO of course) Windows front end for
Simon GnuPG and the one I use
Hello Tbudl,
I am having problems with a friend who sends me messages that are encryoted
using gnupg and then signed using smime. TB! only sees the smime and seems to
ignore the gunpg. This is the case with all standard and beta releases
Sean
--
Thawte, GSWoT and CaCert WOT Assurer
I
Hi
On Friday 11 July 2008 at 6:07:56 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick Dutton wrote:
This is a(nother) XP re-install, I keep forgetting what I did to get
things working a few years ago.
Saving all these snippets in text files, or written in a book, may
help you with that (-;
--
Best
Hello,
I've got GnuPG integration working with TB, using WinPT front-end, but
have a couple of things that I'd like to tidy up.
1. Running gpg gives the following error:
gpg: NOTE: old default options file
`D:/Home/user/MyDocuments/openPGP\options' ignored
I can delete the options
Hallo Nick,
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:34:16 +0100GMT (11-7-2008, 18:34 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
ND I've got GnuPG integration working with TB, using WinPT front-end, but
ND have a couple of things that I'd like to tidy up.
ND 1. Running gpg gives the following error:
ND gpg: NOTE
Hello Roelof,
Crikey - thanks for the speedy response!
On Friday, July 11, 2008, you wrote:
ND I've got GnuPG integration working with TB, using WinPT front-end, but
ND have a couple of things that I'd like to tidy up.
ND 1. Running gpg gives the following error:
ND gpg: NOTE: old default
Mica,
Monday, October 16, 2006, 10:08:22 PM, you wrote:
MM setpref (and here you choose wanted hashes -- see the table below)
MM ...and then when you are finished, you type in this...
MM save
MM ...hit [enter] button and your key preferences are updated.
MM The list of abbreviations for
and tricky and is
created by a quite different and modern technology.)
Basically, it is safer to encrypt a TBat backup file(s), and the \Mail
folder (when is not in use, for instance), using some fine algorithm in
GnuPG, than to use TBat's EOTF (so called Encryption On The Fly),
since those
...and it will be used as your default one. TBat will accept this
too.
It worked - thanks!
MM Basically, it is safer to encrypt a TBat backup file(s), and the
\Mail
MM folder (when is not in use, for instance), using some fine algorithm
in
MM GnuPG, than to use TBat's EOTF (so called Encryption On The Fly),
MM since
.
Easiest way to do so is to simply mount this container/volume and then
to install TBat there (and perhaps some other programs you wouldn't want
others to tinker with).
Thanks again for all of your help. I think I'm getting GnuPG to the
point that I can safely uninstall PGP.
You're welcome
messages, but who knows - maybe someday someone will
actually send me something substantive. :-)
- --
Thanks,
Rick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.52
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJFPCycAAoJELf6ImSjvaeW2BsQAJydtP/cX4TyVfnc78XskI9F
/gPPQzDcdyEr1fLJrgZGOdllYQ82
Hi Richard,
on Sat, 14 Oct 2006 22:14:05 +0500GMT (14.10.2006, 19:14 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
[set up GnuPG]
RHS I've done this and was able to select GnPG. I then edited the file
RHS preferences to point it to my keyrings, but I still get an error
RHS message that no secret key available
Peter,
Wednesday, October 18, 2006, 1:07:43 AM, you wrote:
PM Have a look at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171 and say if
PM this is the behavior you mean. For the time being, I seem to have been
PM the only victim of this quirk - *if* it's the same...
PM ,- [ OpenPGP Error ]
PM |
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Sun, 15 Oct 2006,
@ @ at 07:14:35 +0500, when Richard H. Stoddard wrote:
Mica,
Saturday, October 14, 2006, 11:25:54 PM, you wrote:
MM If your GnuPG otherwise works, even if just
the members of are
MM here TBat, WinPT and GnuPG, I suspect that WinPT is the one that is
MM causing it. Its author also himself hints (on the other list) that it is
MM the possible reason, due to certain incompleteness of this software. Try
MM GPGShell instead and I think you'll not have such problems
to 2048, while a DH/DSS key can go
to 4096. Which is the better option for PGP? (Eventually I will phase
out of using PGP, but need to have GnuGP working reliably first.)
It is safer/best to create new keys using GnuPG. (PGP will manage then
with 3072 bits RSA keys quite fine, and even
Mica,
Monday, October 16, 2006, 10:08:22 PM, you wrote:
MM More specific and expert answers you'll most probably get on the
MM other, PGP, more specialized, list, as for GnuPG alone, while the
MM matters of Bat's and GnuPG's integration have better chance to be solved
MM here. I guess. Even only
I have been trying to make The Bat! and GnuPG work together. I
installed the latest version along with WinPT, and once in awhile it
would work, but usually not. I am now having problems with PGP as
well. In both cases, when I try to sign or encrypt using the tray app
I get error messages
Hello Richard H. Stoddard everyone else,
on 14-Okt-2006 at 18:30 you (Richard H. Stoddard) wrote:
I have been trying to make The Bat! and GnuPG work together. I
installed the latest version along with WinPT, and once in awhile it
would work, but usually not. I am now having problems with PGP
Alexander,
Saturday, October 14, 2006, 9:37:24 PM, you wrote:
ASK In TB's main mindow, go to the Tools menu and choose OpenPGP /
ASK Select OpenPGP version. In the window that opens, GnuPG should be
ASK available. If its greyed out, you must add the path to the gpg
ASK executables to the PATH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Sat, 14 Oct 2006,
@ @ at 21:30:39 +0500, when Richard H. Stoddard wrote:
I have been trying to make The Bat! and GnuPG work together. I
installed the latest version along
Mica,
Saturday, October 14, 2006, 11:25:54 PM, you wrote:
MM If your GnuPG otherwise works, even if just once it was working well
MM (for instance you hit Ctrl+Shift+S in TB editor and it offers the
MM combo with the list of your keys), then it means that it's properly
MM installed, both
-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFFMaQu9MpAGb2a408RA0J3AKDgCr8q1IOvJmQ4baVCb2I/rE6UFgCgz38g
8nAU1Cn481lKmRCU4sAZyoY=
=QooF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat
Scott,
Sunday, October 15, 2006, 8:00:23 AM, you wrote:
SF Did you sign your own key? If not try that.
Yes, I did sign it earlier. It's gotta be something else.
--
Thanks,
Rick
Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Hello Henk,
Wednesday, April 19, 2006, 7:33:43 PM, you wrote:
On 19-4-2006 20:40 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to know how to auto ident a person using GnuPG. If it is ever
possible of course
Do you mean automaticly retrieving a key of a person using GnuPG?
Yes this is what I mean
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:48:29 -0400GMT (20-4-2006, 20:48 +0200, where I
live), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to know how to auto ident a person using GnuPG. If it is
ever possible of course
Do you mean automaticly retrieving a key of a person using GnuPG?
Yes this is what I mean
Hello all,
I'd like to know how to auto ident a person using GnuPG. If it is ever
possible of course
thank you
--
Best regards,
floydstyle
..A Requiem To The Post-War Dream
Dear Floydstyle,
@19-Apr-2006, 14:40 -0400 (19-Apr 19:40 here) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [F]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
F I'd like to know how to auto ident a person using GnuPG. If it is
F ever possible of course
Right now it isn't possible. PGP verification is currently a manual
event
On 19-4-2006 20:40 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to know how to auto ident a person using GnuPG. If it is ever
possible of course
Do you mean automaticly retrieving a key of a person using GnuPG?
--
Henk M. de Bruijn
.
DC Note that there are other GnuPG issues, especially when wanting to
DC encrypt to multiple keys for one email address (As is the case
DC with the PGPNET Yahoo group.
This is more of a function of GPG. Basically you need to create a
group entry in your gpg.conf file with the e-mail address
that there are other GnuPG issues, especially when wanting to
DC encrypt to multiple keys for one email address (As is the case
DC with the PGPNET Yahoo group.
This is more of a function of GPG. Basically you need to create a
group entry in your gpg.conf file with the e-mail address of PGPNET
by the long keyids of the group members.
DC Never did get that to worth with TB!, even using the group line with and
DC without the around the email address.
DC Even with that, I should be able to manually select multiple keys to
DC encrypt an email to from within TB! with GnuPG...
I'd like that too
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 02 Mar 2005,
@ @ at 19:25:18 -0500, when David Calvarese wrote:
gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message
gpg: BAD signature from David Calvarese
And for this
Hi,
I'm having problems with both GnuPG and PGP with regards to
integration with TB! The problems are more severe with GnuPG, so I'll
start with that. Please note that I'm still using TB! v2.12.00. I'm
using GnuPG v1.4.0, and PGP v8.1.
Here's what happens when I try to verify a simple inline
Melissa Reese wrote:
Here's what happens when I try to verify a simple inline clear
signature using the TB! integration with GnuPG:
gpg: conversion from `utf-8' to `CP0' not available
Upgrade to the 1.4.1rc2, it fixes that problem.
Note that there are other GnuPG issues, especially when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 02 Mar 2005,
@ @ at 14:40:13 -0500, when David Calvarese wrote:
.
I get this when check your signature, David. This sort of GPG message is
new to me. What that would mean?
Mica Mijatovic wrote:
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 02 Mar 2005,
@ @ at 14:40:13 -0500, when David Calvarese wrote:
.
I get this when check your signature, David. This sort of GPG message is
new to me. What that would mean?
gpg: Signature
Hi David,
On Wednesday, March 02, 2005, at 11:40:13 AM PST, you wrote:
Upgrade to the 1.4.1rc2, it fixes that problem.
Hee hee! I just sent you an off-list message relating the interesting,
yet disturbing experience of installing this new version of GnuPG.
Problems went way beyond simple TB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 02 Mar 2005,
@ @ at 15:06:24 -0500, when David Calvarese wrote:
Mica Mijatovic wrote:
I get this when check your signature, David. This sort of GPG message is
new to me. What
Mica Mijatovic wrote:
I'm not sure, but do you have my keys in your keyring? If that's not
it, maybe someone on the list will know.
I got your keys and it shows this:
gpg: Signature made 03/02/05 20:40:16 Central Europe Standard Time using DSA
key ID 1C9D5360
gpg: WARNING: signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi
On Thursday 3 March 2005 at 12:25:18 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], David Calvarese wrote:
I'm not sure either... They're showing good sigs on my end when I
look in my sent items folder. Maybe because I'm using something
other than SHA-1 as a digest...
Hi MFPA,
On Wednesday, March 02, 2005, at 4:43:42 PM PST, you wrote:
I cannot verify Melissa's messages because I don't have the keys
Did you see the URL in my signature? :-)
but the rest of this thread all check out OK here, using PGP8.1
By the way, the message of David's that Mica found
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi
On Thursday 3 March 2005 at 1:03:13 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Melissa Reese wrote:
I cannot verify Melissa's messages because I don't have the keys
Did you see the URL in my signature? :-)
I forgot to look there. After PGP tried some keyservers and
Hi
On Friday 18 February 2005 at 8:54:23 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], David Calvarese
wrote:
My only real issue with buying it is that I need to use it on 2
PCs. my work PC (for personal email) and my home PC (for the
same). But I'm only ever going to be signing on one at a time.
As far as
Hi
On Friday 18 February 2005 at 8:02:16 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander S. Kunz
wrote:
Let's see how it behaves regarding the sig delimiter.
I think you would have to inline sign, not PGP/MIME for the sig
delimiter to be affected.
Much better if you ask me, because its PGP/MIME
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
TWIMC
begin quote
We are pleased to announce the availability of a the second release
candidate for the forthcoming 1.4.1 version of GnuPG:
ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.1rc2.tar.bz2 (2.7M)
ftp://ftp.gnupg.org
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 20:14:40 +0100, Peter Meyns wrote:
PM Hi David,
PM on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:54:20 -0500GMT, you wrote:
DC I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes
DC up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --space. Any
DC way to fix that?
PM
Hi David,
on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:31:58 -0500GMT, you wrote:
DC I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes
DC up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --space. Any
DC way to fix that?
PM Not that I know of. TB! recognizes sig delimiters defected by its
Hello Peter Meyns everyone else,
on 18-Feb-2005 at 20:47 you (Peter Meyns) wrote:
Let's see how it behaves regarding the sig delimiter.
Much better if you ask me, because its PGP/MIME instead of inline signing,
and the sig delimiter is also totally normal. :-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 21:02:16 +0100, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK on 18-Feb-2005 at 20:47 you (Peter Meyns) wrote:
Let's see how it behaves regarding the sig delimiter.
ASK Much better if you ask me, because its PGP/MIME instead of inline signing,
ASK and the sig delimiter is also totally
Hi David Calvarese,
On 18/02/2005 03:11 PM, you wrote:
I suppose I'll have to up and buy it then. I was hoping to avoid
having to do that.Ummm... What exactly does it do different
anyway?
TB! can generate PGP/MIME signatures using GnuPG. You don't need to get
PGP v8
Hello David Calvarese everyone else,
on 18-Feb-2005 at 20:31 you (David Calvarese) wrote:
Hrm... Would PGP V8 be any better for that? I wouldn't object to
buying it if I had to.
Buy? Do you need to use it commercially? If not:
http://www.pgp.com/downloads/freeware/index.html
--
Best
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 21:54:32 +0100, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK on 18-Feb-2005 at 20:31 you (David Calvarese) wrote:
Hrm... Would PGP V8 be any better for that? I wouldn't object to
buying it if I had to.
ASK Buy? Do you need to use it commercially? If not:
ASK
binary is available here:
ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/binary/gnupg-w32cli-1.4.1rc1.exe (1377k)
ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/binary/gnupg-w32cli-1.4.1rc1.exe.sig
For those of you who also use GPGrelay:
The first preview of the next GPGrelay release (v0.956) is available
here:
http
On Tuesday, November 23, 2004 at 10:00:38 AM [GMT -0500], Omn wrote:
I've been using GnuPG with The Bat! for quite sometime. However I
could not do so with GnuPG 1.3.92. This one requires iconv.dll.
Anybody had success using GnuPG 1.3.92 with The bat?
Not here. Whenever I try doing anything
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi tbudl,
I've been using GnuPG with The Bat! for quite sometime. However I
could not do so with GnuPG 1.3.92. This one requires iconv.dll.
Anybody had success using GnuPG 1.3.92 with The bat?
- --
Best regards,
omn
Hello Joseph,
Thursday, September 9, 2004, 11:09:46 PM, you wrote (possibly edited):
On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 20:05:47 GMT, Peter Meyns wrote:
I find TB!'s implemented support of GnuPG quite sufficient. I have
GPGShell installed here, but I rarely use it.
Peter, do you have just one signing key
with the necessary caveats of course, but
in any case it does do the encrypt and sign action.
- --
Best regards,
Costas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
iD8DBQFBQcVwnGLgj4bhmZcRAp72AJ9aU5Bmq/i+L/ClJN30YpDL4dvXUQCfYV6i
vecWqoK/BP8jxP4J3qrXMw0=
=uymK
-END PGP SIGNATURE
Hello,
Is there a way to incorporate a GnuPG Key Manager, for example
GPGKeys, in The Bat?
Apparently there are options only for PGP, covering practically all
versions up to version 8, but nothing similar for GnuPG.
--
Best regards,
Costas
pgp1vDT9QUyFP.pgp
Description: PGP
Hi Costas,
on Thu, 9 Sep 2004 17:14:33 +0300GMT, you wrote:
CP Is there a way to incorporate a GnuPG Key Manager, for example
CP GPGKeys, in The Bat?
CP Apparently there are options only for PGP, covering practically all
CP versions up to version 8, but nothing similar for GnuPG.
I
On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 20:05:47 GMT, Peter Meyns wrote:
I find TB!'s implemented support of GnuPG quite sufficient. I have
GPGShell installed here, but I rarely use it.
Peter, do you have just one signing key? It's been quite a while
since I tried to use GPG from within TB!, but I couldn't get
Bob, [B] wrote:
Can someone please tell me how to sign a message using GnuPG with TB!
whereby the signature appears as an attachment rather than inline?
You need to enable GnuPG integration with TB! via the Tools menu's
'OpenPGP//Choose OpenPGP Version' configuration.
When finished
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thursday, April 22, 2004 8:08 AM
is in the correct path (C:\GnuPG\)
I extracted it to that folder, I ran the regitry key and later
i ran it in the command line. Works perfectly.
And the bat doesn't even recognize
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello B,
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 08:30:03 -0400GMT (22-4-2004, 14:30 +0100, where I live),
you wrote:
BRIA is in the correct path (C:\GnuPG\)
BRIA I extracted it to that folder, I ran the regitry key and later
BRIA i ran it in the command line. Works
Dear B,
@22-Apr-2004, 08:30 -0400 (22-Apr 13:30 UK time) B R i a N S [BRI]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
BRI is in the correct path (C:\GnuPG\) I extracted it to that
BRI folder, I ran the regitry key and later i ran it in the command
BRI line. Works perfectly.
Yes - but it doesn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wednesday, April 21, 2004 5:11 PM
Hi everybody, i have a problem with my OpenPGP support.
I have installed GnuPG v1.2.2 for use with The Bat! 2.02 CE,
when I will select the checkbox to activate the GnuPG, it looks like
it wasn't
Dear B,
@21-Apr-2004, 17:39 -0400 (21-Apr 22:39 UK time) B R i a N S [BRI]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
BRI Hi everybody, i have a problem with my OpenPGP support.
BRI I have installed GnuPG v1.2.2 for use with The Bat! 2.02 CE,
BRI when I will select the checkbox to activate the GnuPG
B R i a N S [EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 21-Apr-2004 5:39:54 PM
GnuPG integration mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have installed GnuPG v1.2.2 for use with The Bat! 2.02 CE.
From where can we get your public key?
--
Chris - Nun mi Esperanton lernas.
Quoting when replying to this message is good for your karma
1 - 100 of 299 matches
Mail list logo
