Annoying URL link bug

2008-03-26 Thread John Phillips
Bat 4.0.18 XP Pro SP2 Firefox browser When clicking to open a URL I always get an error message and tone as follows: http ...(htp goes here)System could not find specified file. However Firefox lies in the task bar with the URL open. Of course I have to kill the error message. This was

Re: Annoying URL link bug

2008-03-26 Thread Uwe Steinfeld
Hello John, Wednesday, March 26, 2008, 11:25:33 PM, you wrote: This was reported in version 3.xx, and somehow nothing seems to have been done. Or is it a Firefox issue? It is a known Firefox issue.

Re: Annoying URL link bug

2008-03-26 Thread John Phillips
Uwe On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, at 23:43:19 [GMT +0100] (09:43:19 27/03/2008 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: t is a known Firefox issue. http://kb.mozillazine.org/Windows_error_opening_Internet_shortcut_or_local_HTML_file_-_Firefox Thanks. In my case prolly Google Toolbar. -- Regards, John

Re: ANNOYING!

2003-10-30 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Wednesday, October 29, 2003, St - Musaic.Net wrote... Why is it that an Incoming message (original message) where From is: Glennie, David {LRUC Programme, BST} [EMAIL PROTECTED] converted to Glennie, David{LRUCProgramme, BST} [EMAIL PROTECTED] (yes, no hyphens) in the outgoing mail (Sent

Re: ANNOYING!

2003-10-30 Thread St - Musaic.Net
I was spending ages looking for hypens in the original from, but I see you meant quotes. I was awfully tired at the time of writing - I am sorry for this particular mistyping and the others I see are in there! [Quotes] aren't needed in the header from what I remember... I feel they are

Re: ANNOYING!

2003-10-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jonathan, On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:03:27 -0600 GMT (30/10/2003, 22:03 +0700 GMT), Jonathan Angliss wrote: [Quotes] They aren't needed in the header from what I remember, Yes, they are needed when there are reserved characters (full-stops) in the realname part of the email address.

Re: ANNOYING!

2003-10-30 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Thursday, October 30, 2003, Thomas Fernandez wrote... They aren't needed in the header from what I remember, Yes, they are needed when there are reserved characters (full-stops) in the realname part of the email address. That teaches me for walking away from my keyboard when I'm composing

Re: ANNOYING!

2003-10-30 Thread Markus Gloede
Hi, St - Musaic.Net wrote: This has been noticed, you should change something in the body of the email, then switching back to the headers doesn't alter the top part... So is it not a bug? I can't imagine this is how it should be! If I'm not mistaken the developer(s?) are aware of this

ANNOYING!

2003-10-29 Thread St - Musaic.Net
One thing that annoys me is reading about functionailty and features in TB! that for some reason suddenly behave different (and wrongly). For example, I have a great number of rules. Some of these rules are handling mailing lists. And suddenly, under certain conditions the rules are

Re: Strange and very annoying: I now often get prompted for username/pwd - what can I do? (TB! 1.62)

2003-09-26 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, gd_news wrote... I'm using The Bat! 1.62, there are multiple mail accounts set up. These accounts use different providers. The PC is connected to a LAN all the time. Now, sometimes when the automatic mailbox

Strange and very annoying: I now often get prompted for username/pwd - what can I do? (TB! 1.62)

2003-09-24 Thread gd_news
Hello list, I've been using TB! for a few years now... but now I got a real problem I can't seem to figure out. Perhaps someone on the list can give me a hint with my problem. I'm using The Bat! 1.62, there are multiple mail accounts set up. These accounts use different providers. The PC is

Re: Strange and very annoying: I now often get prompted for username/pwd - what can I do? (TB! 1.62)

2003-09-24 Thread P Graham
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 17:32:48 +0200, gd_news wrote I'm using The Bat! 1.62, there are multiple mail accounts set up. These accounts use different providers. The PC is connected to a LAN all the time. Now, sometimes when the automatic mailbox check is done or when I press check mail for all,

Re: The greatest most annoying problem halts my PC

2002-12-08 Thread Gerard
ON Saturday, December 7, 2002, 3:43:06 PM, you wrote: ACM Have you set your inbox folder to be compressed on exit? VBG No, I compress it often though. Hi Victor, I really should se this to automatic on exit because all your mails pass through your inbox even if they are move to an other folder

Re[2]: The greatest most annoying problem halts my PC

2002-12-08 Thread Victor B. Gonzalez
Hello Gerard, My problems with TB *freezing* all occurred with version 1.61 on XP. I uninstalled it reinstalled 1.62 - rebuilt TB profile (2 hours) and last night till today for the first time TB did not *freeze* on me once. I've got to admit its just better when it doesn't *freeze*

Re: The greatest most annoying problem halts my PC

2002-12-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Gerard, On Sun, 8 Dec 2002 13:03:19 +0100 GMT (08/12/02, 19:03 +0700 GMT), Gerard wrote: ACM Have you set your inbox folder to be compressed on exit? VBG No, I compress it often though. I really should se this to automatic on exit because all your mails pass through your inbox even if

Re: The greatest most annoying problem halts my PC

2002-12-07 Thread Allie C Martin
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Victor B. Gonzalez [VBG] wrote:' VBG The Bat! slows my entire PC down from out of no where. It VBG doesn't freeze exactly, it *slows* it down incredibly but from VBG here on I will refer to it as a freeze. VBG For example in the last 4 days I would

Re[2]: The greatest most annoying problem halts my PC

2002-12-07 Thread Victor B. Gonzalez
Hello Allie, Saturday, December 7, 2002, 6:24:19 AM, you wrote: VBG The Bat! slows my entire PC down from out of no where. It VBG doesn't freeze exactly, it *slows* it down incredibly but from VBG here on I will refer to it as a freeze. ACM I see from your signature that you're running XP. How

Re[3]: The greatest most annoying problem halts my PC

2002-12-07 Thread Victor B. Gonzalez
Hello Victor, Please disregard my last messages Reply-To address. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets deleted at server level. I've got my filters working on explicit permission to help fight spam. Please re-send any messages. Thank you Allie -- Best regards, Victor B. Gonzalez

Re: The greatest most annoying problem halts my PC

2002-12-07 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Victor, On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 12:25:12 -0500GMT (7-12-02, 18:25 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: VBG Please disregard my last messages Reply-To address. Never mind, whatever Reply-To you insert, it gets replaced by the list Reply-To. This is done by the list server, so nobody saw your

The greatest most annoying problem halts my PC

2002-12-06 Thread Victor B. Gonzalez
Hello tbudl, I am on my 4th days trial with The Bat! and everything about it is amazing except for this. The Bat! slows my entire PC down from out of no where. It doesn't freeze exactly, it *slows* it down incredibly but from here on I will refer to it as a freeze. For example in

Re: The greatest most annoying problem halts my PC

2002-12-06 Thread Daniel Hirning
In reply to Victor's message 'The greatest most annoying problem halts my PC' on Sat, 7 Dec 2002 00:31:36 -0500 from [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Victor, VBG Does anyone have an idea? I would be greatly appreciative to any VBG idea or solution that doesn't hinder it's performance. The only thing I

Re[2]: The greatest most annoying problem halts my PC

2002-12-06 Thread Victor B. Gonzalez
Hello Daniel, Saturday, December 7, 2002, 12:42:30 AM, you wrote: VBG Does anyone have an idea? I would be greatly appreciative to any VBG idea or solution that doesn't hinder it's performance. DH The only thing I could think of - admittedly not really like what you DH describe, but the only

Re: Annoying error sound

2002-07-14 Thread Mihai
. If I follow M his instructions TB won't get my mail beacause it wants to connect via M Dial-up. It doesn't detect that I'm connected to the internet via LAN. :( TF Options / Network Admin / Local Area Network. Yes, I agree with you, but now I'm back where I started. TB will keep annoying me

Re: Annoying error sound

2002-07-14 Thread Mihai
Hello Roelof, Sunday, July 14, 2002, 2:05:51 AM, you wrote: RO Hallo Mihai, RO On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 23:13:50 +0300GMT (13-7-02, 22:13 +0200GMT, where RO I live), you wrote: M unfortunately the second answer does not apply because I'm using a M LAN connection. If I follow his instructions TB

Annoying error sound

2002-07-13 Thread Mihai
annoying. How do I deactivate that sound besides the idea to remove the Exclamation sound from the Windows Sounds Scheme ? -- Best regards, Mihai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http

Re: Annoying error sound

2002-07-13 Thread Roelof Otten
it too often M becomes very annoying. MHow do I deactivate that sound besides the idea to remove the M Exclamation sound from the Windows Sounds Scheme ? You can't deactivate the sound unless you deactivate it in the windows soundsettings. However, in Options - Network Administration, you

Re: Annoying error sound

2002-07-13 Thread Daniel Grunberg
a Exclamation sound. This might be OK...but if I hear it too often becomes very annoying. How do I deactivate that sound besides the idea to remove the Exclamation sound from the Windows Sounds Scheme ? TheBat | Account | Properties | Sound From there you can turn the sound on or off, or browse

Re[2]: Annoying error sound

2002-07-13 Thread Mihai
Hello Daniel, Saturday, July 13, 2002, 5:35:04 PM, you wrote: DG Sat, 13 Jul 2002 15:56:34[GMT +0300] (8:56 AM EDST) Mihai wrote: How do I deactivate that sound besides the idea to remove the Exclamation sound from the Windows Sounds Scheme ? DG TheBat | Account | Properties | Sound

Re: Annoying error sound

2002-07-13 Thread Thomas F
Hello Mihai, On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 23:13:50 +0300 GMT (14/07/02, 03:13 +0700 GMT), Mihai wrote: M Until now, Roelof Otten aswered me but unfortunately the second answer M does not apply because I'm using a LAN connection. If I follow M his instructions TB won't get my mail beacause it wants to

Re: Annoying error sound

2002-07-13 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Mihai, On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 23:13:50 +0300GMT (13-7-02, 22:13 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: M unfortunately the second answer does not apply because I'm using a M LAN connection. If I follow his instructions TB won't get my mail M beacause it wants to connect via Dial-up. It doesn't

Really annoying quoting-thingy

2002-07-11 Thread Jakob Breivik Grimstveit
See mail file located at ... URL: http://www.grimstveit.net/jakob/files/temp/tb.zip I find it *really* annoying the way TB tries to detect quoting characters. Many times, it is an url or an arrow sign (like this -) which is interpreted as quoting characters. URL to messeage

Re: Really annoying quoting-thingy

2002-07-11 Thread Thomas F
Hello Jakob, On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:59:46 +0200 GMT (11/07/02, 13:59 +0700 GMT), Jakob Breivik Grimstveit wrote: JBG I find it *really* annoying the way TB tries to detect quoting characters. JBG Many times, it is an url or an arrow sign (like this -) which is JBG interpreted

Re: Really annoying quoting-thingy

2002-07-11 Thread Jakob Breivik Grimstveit
At 11.07.2002 09:41, Thomas F wrote the following: Hello Jakob, On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:59:46 +0200 GMT (11/07/02, 13:59 +0700 GMT), Jakob Breivik Grimstveit wrote: JBG I find it *really* annoying the way TB tries to detect quoting JBG characters. Many times, it is an url

Re[2]: Getting rid of annoying bleep?

2002-07-01 Thread Julian Knight
Hello Allie, on 29/Jun/2002 you wrote: JK Is there any way to turn off the annoying bleep that is given when JK an attempted connection fails? ACM You do this by making TB! not attempt a connection whenever you're not ACM online. ACM Go to menu - Options/Network and Administration ACM Enable

Re[2]: Getting rid of annoying bleep?

2002-07-01 Thread Julian Knight
Hello Thomas, on 29/Jun/2002 you wrote: JK Is there any way to turn off the annoying bleep that is given when an JK attempted connection fails? TF I have a key HKCU / Software / RIT / The Bat! / BeepMode (which is set TF to 0 (zero). I am sure I don't hear any beeps. TF If all else fails

Getting rid of annoying bleep?

2002-06-29 Thread Julian Knight
Hello all, Is there any way to turn off the annoying bleep that is given when an attempted connection fails? I like to control when my machine goes online but also like to have emails update rapidly when I really am online so I have the periodical checking set to every minute. (Using The Bat

Re: Getting rid of annoying bleep?

2002-06-29 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Julian Knight [JK] wrote: JK Is there any way to turn off the annoying bleep that is given when JK an attempted connection fails? You do this by making TB! not attempt a connection

Re: Getting rid of annoying bleep?

2002-06-29 Thread Thomas F
Hello Julian, On Fri, 28 Jun 2002 14:15:36 +0100 GMT (28/06/02, 20:15 +0700 GMT), Julian Knight wrote: JK Is there any way to turn off the annoying bleep that is given when an JK attempted connection fails? I have a key HKCU / Software / RIT / The Bat! / BeepMode (which is set to 0 (zero). I

Re: Annoying address book limitation

2002-05-06 Thread Miguel A. Urech
, that is a concept issue. While what I point out about the AB can probably be considered a bug or at least un undesirable and annoying limitation. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.60c Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ

Re: Annoying address book limitation

2002-05-06 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Jonathan, No... you're not the only one that has this 'issue'. I get it too. As I have just told Tim, I am glad to hear I am not alone on this, thanks. snipped ... but they may have put it in that way by design purely so that you cannot have several edit dialogs open at the same

Re: Annoying address book limitation

2002-05-06 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Miguel A. Urech [MAU] wrote: ... MAU If the Edit Address Entry dialog is open you can switch to the MAU view folder view I can't even do that. MAU but can't highlight and copy anything and you can't even switch MAU to the preview pane. Annoying

Re: Annoying address book limitation

2002-05-05 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Melissa Reese [MR] wrote: ... MR Right. When I first started using TB!, I was confused by the MR editor. I've since come to *prefer* the way it works; especially MR and specifically for email. There may be a small thing here or MR there that I might

Annoying address book limitation

2002-05-04 Thread Miguel A. Urech
or view folder) into the Edit Address Entry dialog. If the Edit Address Entry dialog is open you can switch to the view folder view but can't highlight and copy anything and you can't even switch to the preview pane. Annoying, don't you think? You can't even use SmartBat as an intermediary

Re: Annoying address book limitation

2002-05-04 Thread Tim
On Saturday, 4 May 2002, Miguel A. Urech wrote: MAU I don't know if this has been reported or dealt with in this list MAU before, I must admit I didn't even look in the archives. I don't know if it's been reported. I've never reported it, but I have (in the privacy of my own home) called down

Re: Annoying address book limitation

2002-05-04 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Tim! On Saturday, May 4, 2002 at 11:58:30 AM you wrote: My response is: Many people post complaining about the editor. The replies can usually be summarised as Get used to it, you'll love it. That is, change yourself not the software, which is essentially what the quote above is

Re: Annoying address book limitation

2002-05-04 Thread Jonathan Angliss
not copy/paste from an e-mail (either in preview or view folder) into the Edit Address Entry dialog. If the Edit Address Entry dialog is open you can switch to the view folder view but can't highlight and copy anything and you can't even switch to the preview pane. Annoying, don't you think

Re: Annoying address book limitation

2002-05-04 Thread Melissa Reese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, May 04, 2002, at 3:36:49 AM PST, Dierk Haasis wrote: Tim: My response is: Many people post complaining about the editor. The replies can usually be summarised as Get used to it, you'll love it. That is, change yourself not the

Re: Annoying address book limitation

2002-05-04 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Melissa, On 04-05-2002 18:52, you wrote: M When new TB! users complain about the TB! editor not working M normally, I can only hope that soon, they will realize that there M are different questions to ask. They may - as it happened with me - be M very pleasantly surprised with what can be

Re[2]: annoying multi-line cookie protocol

2001-01-08 Thread SyP
Hello Beat, You wrote on 1/7/2001, 9:07 PM: Beat But you can use the new %WRAPPED macro (v1.49). Then you can insert Beat your cookies like this: Beat %WRAPPED="%COOKIE" How should I modify it to wrap %INCLUDED cookies? My template goes on like this: %QINCLUDE="QE" and QE then:

Re[3]: annoying multi-line cookie protocol

2001-01-08 Thread Beat Strasser
Hi SyP How should I modify it to wrap %INCLUDED cookies? My template goes on like this: %QINCLUDE="QE" %WRAPPED='%QINCLUDE="QE"' or the better solution, 'cause you use it as a signature: %ISSIGNATURE %COOKIE="F:\Program Files\The Bat!\tag.trt" %ISSIGNATURE %WRAPPED='%COOKIE="F:\Program

Re[4]: annoying multi-line cookie protocol

2001-01-08 Thread SyP
Hello Beat, You wrote on 1/8/2001, 11:09 AM: Beat Hi SyP How should I modify it to wrap %INCLUDED cookies? My template goes on like this: %QINCLUDE="QE" Beat %WRAPPED='%QINCLUDE="QE"' I got this: -8-CUT HERE-- =' Too bad stupidity

Re: annoying multi-line cookie protocol

2001-01-08 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Szabolcs, On 08 January 2001 at 13:19:53 +0100 (which was 12:19 where I live) SyP wrote and made these points: Beat %WRAPPED='%QINCLUDE="QE"' S I got this: snip erm .. you're still using beta/1. Isn't this only working fully in the final

Re[2]: annoying multi-line cookie protocol

2001-01-08 Thread SyP
Hello Marck, You wrote on 1/8/2001, 2:14 PM: Marck erm .. you're still using beta/1. Isn't this only working fully in Marck the final release? You are right about this. blush Now working like a charm. -- Thankss, SyP Heisenberg might have been here. --

annoying multi-line cookie protocol

2001-01-07 Thread Charlie Laidlaw
Hello batfans, to me, it seems like a PITA that mult-line cookies need this '/n' to signify a carriage return. If i download or create a big text file of quotes, i've got to go through and insert them manually (which could be a huge job). I've just discovered that the old 'byelines'

Re: annoying multi-line cookie protocol

2001-01-07 Thread Beat Strasser
Hi Charlie to me, it seems like a PITA that mult-line cookies need this '/n' to signify a carriage return. If i download or create a big text file of quotes, i've got to go through and insert them manually (which could be a huge job). I've just discovered that the old 'byelines'

Re: annoying multi-line cookie protocol

2001-01-07 Thread George F. Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Charlie, Monday, January 01, 2001, 12:45:53 PM, you wrote: CL to me, it seems like a PITA that mult-line cookies need this '/n' to CL signify a carriage return. If i download or create a big text file of CL quotes, Seems to me leaving it up to

Re: annoying multi-line cookie protocol

2001-01-07 Thread Manfred Ell
On 07-01-2001 at 21:07:16GMT +0100 (which was 20:07 where I live) Beat Strasser wrote regarding the subject of "annoying multi-line cookie protocol" Hello Beat, Beat If you press enter, then the second (and third...) line will be Beat treated as individual cookies. Beat But

Re: annoying multi-line cookie protocol

2001-01-07 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Charlie, On Tue, 2 Jan 2001 at 07:45:53 GMT +1100 (which was 12:45 PM where I live) witnesses say Charlie Laidlaw typed: snip mult-line cookies need this '/n' to signify a carriage return. Just a picky point, it should be '\n' to signify a carriage return. snip Why must it be