Re: Bug in colorgroup

2015-05-16 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Trash, A reminder of what Trash typed on: Saturday, May 16, 2015 at 09:58:23 GMT +0100 T There is a major bug involved with Virtual folders filters and color groups. T If I create a Virtual Folder that selects items based on color group T (in fact one of 5 colors), then within a few

Re: Bug tracker notification

2009-12-21 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello Thomas, TF Hello Jack, TF On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:47:35 -0600 GMT (18/Dec/09, 22:47 PM +0700 GMT), TF Jack S. LaRosa wrote: JSL Can someone tell me what this means? JSL The following issue has been RESOLVED. JSL == JSL

Re: Bug tracker notification

2009-12-21 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jack, On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:56:22 -0600 GMT (21/Dec/09, 20:56 PM +0700 GMT), Jack S. LaRosa wrote: TF Of course it is so. They cannot fix bugs retrospectively, it's fixed TF in the next beta version, which I did download to verify. It will be TF fixed in the next release version. JSL

Re: Bug tracker notification

2009-12-21 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello Thomas, TF Hello Jack, TF On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:56:22 -0600 GMT (21/Dec/09, 20:56 PM +0700 GMT), TF Jack S. LaRosa wrote: TF Of course it is so. They cannot fix bugs retrospectively, it's fixed TF in the next beta version, which I did download to verify. It will be TF fixed in the next

Re: Bug tracker notification

2009-12-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jack, On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:47:35 -0600 GMT (18/Dec/09, 22:47 PM +0700 GMT), Jack S. LaRosa wrote: JSL Can someone tell me what this means? JSL The following issue has been RESOLVED. JSL == JSL

Re: Bug tracker notification

2009-12-19 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello MFPA, M Hi M On Friday 18 December 2009 at 6:17:56 PM, in M mid:464214305.20091218121...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote: I may be old and senile M You *may* be but I have no reason to believe one way or the other (-; but I'm not senile enough to expect my current version to

Re: Bug tracker notification

2009-12-19 Thread MFPA
Hi On Saturday 19 December 2009 at 3:40:12 PM, in mid:1555134765.20091219094...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote: I trust you interpreted my previous message as being posted with tongue being firmly planted in cheek? Of course (-; -- Best regards MFPA

Re: Bug tracker notification

2009-12-18 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Jack, On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:47:35 -0600GMT (18-12-2009, 16:47 +0100, where I live), you wrote: JSL Since I am *NOT* running the latest and greatest version of TB! does JSL this mean that at some point I'll have to upgrade to see the results JSL of this fix? Yes. Bug fixes are never

Re: Bug tracker notification

2009-12-18 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Friday, December 18, 2009, 10:44:48 AM, Roelof Otten wrote: Yes. Bug fixes are never implemented in abandoned versions. installing a bug fix would be an upgrade. -- Dwight A. Corrin 316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax dcorrin at fastmail.fm photo galleries at

Re: Bug tracker notification

2009-12-18 Thread MFPA
Hi On Friday 18 December 2009 at 3:47:35 PM, in mid:17210726473.20091218094...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote: Fellow list members, Can someone tell me what this means? The following issue has been RESOLVED. ==

Re: Bug tracker notification

2009-12-18 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello MFPA, M Hi M On Friday 18 December 2009 at 3:47:35 PM, in M mid:17210726473.20091218094...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote: Fellow list members, Can someone tell me what this means? The following issue has been RESOLVED.

Re: Bug tracker notification

2009-12-18 Thread MFPA
Hi On Friday 18 December 2009 at 6:17:56 PM, in mid:464214305.20091218121...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote: I may be old and senile You *may* be but I have no reason to believe one way or the other (-; but I'm not senile enough to expect my current version to be magically upgraded.

Re: Bug in Automatic Backup

2008-08-25 Thread Mr Happy
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:03:06 +0200, Peter Meyns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's in the registry. In HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat! there is a key Last backup path. It should be safe to change the value and restart The Bat!. Hi, Hm, when I check that key, it does indeed say my application

Re: Bug in Automatic Backup

2008-08-23 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Mr, on Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:37:06 +1000GMT (23.08.2008, 05:37 +0200GMT here), you wrote: MH What I need to know - where is The Bat getting this old E drive path MH from? It's not from the preferences, that is obvious. It can only be MH from the message base that I've had throughout my Bat

Re: Bug in 3.99.24

2007-09-17 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Monday, September 17, 2007, Tim Hamm wrote: !9/17/2007, 10:50:42: FETCH - Access violation at address 100053CB in module 'antispamservant.tbp'. Read of address remove AntispSniper plugin first, receiving will work I think. Then check if You have latest version of

Re: Bug in 3.99.24

2007-09-17 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Marek, on Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:33:11 +0200GMT (17.09.2007, 20:33 +0200GMT here), you wrote: MM Monday, September 17, 2007, Tim Hamm wrote: !9/17/2007, 10:50:42: FETCH - Access violation at address 100053CB in module 'antispamservant.tbp'. Read of address ^^^

Re: Bug in 3.99.24

2007-09-17 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Monday, September 17, 2007, Tim Hamm wrote: FYI, This is a message I just received from NOD32 Tech Support. The English is not very good but I get the point. This is not a plug-in made it by ESET and is not installed automatically with NOD32. this is right, plugin is created by

Re: Bug in 3.99.24

2007-09-17 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Monday, September 17, 2007, Tim Hamm wrote: I am using antispamservant.tbp not antispsniper are you saying these are the same? sorry, You have right, my mistake, they have similar name... remove AntispamServant and check if they released new version. Also, I noticed you are using

Re: Bug in 3.99.24

2007-09-17 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Monday, September 17, 2007, Tim Hamm wrote: Lately, I have been having issues with TB retrieving e-mail. I can retrieve e-mail from Outlook Express but not from TB. This has to be some kind of bug in Version 3.99.24. Other versions of TB I have not had this issue. if You

Re: Bug -- Windows clipboard only works sometimes

2007-03-15 Thread lindnich
Hello Walt, Using win 98se I fixed the problem by first uninstalling tb (opting to retain all settings during the uninstall dialog) and then rebooting and finally re installing tb pro 3.85 .03. This works fine with clipboard, word, firefox etc. As I lost all the bayesit training I've moved to

Re: Bug: AV

2006-09-16 Thread MFPA
Hi On Wednesday 13 September 2006 at 7:19:32 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Fjelsten wrote: I get these on exiting: --- The Bat! --- Access violation at address 00883959 in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address .

Re: Bug: AV

2006-09-13 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Peter, On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PF I get these on exiting: No AVs here but, if it's been running for more than a few hours, it still takes an absolute age to close down. -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.85.03 with POP3 account AntispamSniper 1.6.5 |

Re: Bug: AV

2006-09-13 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Jim, On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] JK I had similar results here (the long shutdown time) and came across an item JK in one of the help files that suggested NOT doing compress on exit I never have done. I have maintenance scheduled to run each night at 4am and I

Re: Bug says 'fixed' but 'verify wait' ???

2006-05-02 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Marten Gallagher everyone else, on 02-Mai-2006 at 19:12 you (Marten Gallagher) wrote: Does that mean it's fixed but 'they' are waiting for the original reporter to verify that it is *really* fixed or what? Yes -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de) 2 + 2 = 5, for

Re: Bug says 'fixed' but 'verify wait' ???

2006-05-02 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Tuesday, May 2, 2006, Marten Gallagher wrote: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5842 Bug says 'fixed' but 'verify wait' ??? Does that mean it's fixed but 'they' are waiting for the original reporter to verify that it is *really* fixed or what? yes, developer fixed it and

Re: Bug in 3.80.03

2006-04-30 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello John Phillips everyone else, on 30-Apr-2006 at 00:56 you (John Phillips) wrote: You have to install the pcwize smilies. http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/PCWSmileys.php Thanks. In which directory should they be installed? TB's program directory should have a subdirectory images, thats

Re: Bug in 3.80.03

2006-04-30 Thread John Phillips
Hi Alexander, On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, at 11:34:59 [GMT+0200] (which was 19:34:59 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: TB's program directory should have a subdirectory images, thats where the smilies go. Unfortunately not here. OK to create? -- John Phillips, Sydney, Australia Using The Bat!

Re: Bug in 3.80.03

2006-04-30 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello John Phillips everyone else, on 30-Apr-2006 at 11:49 you (John Phillips) wrote: TB's program directory should have a subdirectory images, thats where the smilies go. Unfortunately not here. OK to create? You must have administrative rights to create a new folder in the

Re: Bug in 3.80.03

2006-04-30 Thread John Phillips
Hi Alexander, On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, at 12:00:51 [GMT+0200] (which was 20:00:51 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: Either temporarily by right-clicking in the Rich Text Viewer window/preview and checking the Smileys, or permanently in the editor prefs, Options / Preferences / Viewer-Editor,

Re: Bug in 3.80.03

2006-04-29 Thread MAU
Hello John, Properties General. No place to enter number of messages to keep, or number of days to keep them. I cannot confirm. Are you perhaps looking at a Virtual Folder properties? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.80.03

Re: Bug in 3.80.03

2006-04-29 Thread John Phillips
Hi MAU, On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, at 14:09:29 [GMT+0200] (which was 22:09:29 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: I cannot confirm. Are you perhaps looking at a Virtual Folder properties? No. Using max resolution 1024 x 768. Same problem when creating a new folder. -- John Phillips, Sydney,

Re: Bug in 3.80.03

2006-04-29 Thread Robert D.
Recently, John Phillips squawked : No place to enter number of messages to keep, or number of days to keep them. Not confirmed in my WinME. RMB on Folder Name then Properties brings up window with usual two Q's about # and how long -- Regards, Robert D. :flag-us-ky:

RE: Bug in 3.80.03

2006-04-29 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello Robert, Saturday, April 29, 2006, 2:28:38 PM, you wrote: Recently, John Phillips squawked : No place to enter number of messages to keep, or number of days to keep them. Not confirmed in my WinME. RMB on Folder Name then Properties brings up window with usual two Q's about #

Re: Bug in 3.80.03

2006-04-29 Thread John Phillips
Hi Ian, On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, at 21:49:38 [GMT+1000] (which was 21:49:38 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: This happens with large font. It is something that has to be addressed. Now that you mention itI have also changed the font size in an effort to correct the problem, which well may

Re: Bug in 3.80.03

2006-04-29 Thread John Phillips
Hi Ian, On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, at 21:49:38 [GMT+1000] (which was 21:49:38 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: :Australia_Flag: So how do I view this? (Being a patriotic little digger that I am :-)) -- John Phillips, Sydney, Australia Using The Bat! v3.80.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600

Re: Bug in 3.80.03

2006-04-29 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello John Phillips everyone else, on 29-Apr-2006 at 15:34 you (John Phillips) wrote: So how do I view this? ( You have to install the pcwize smilies. http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/PCWSmileys.php -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de) Aim at Heaven and you will get earth

Re: Bug in 3.80.03

2006-04-29 Thread Mary Bull
Hello John! On Saturday, April 29, 2006, 8:33 AM, you wrote: Font size was 120dpi, now 96 dpi, and the problem is solved. Font size or screen resolution? Font size. I opened a BT issue report a few betas back. Then my main problem of no bottom buttons was fixed. However, I reopened it when

Re: Bug in 3.80.03

2006-04-29 Thread John Phillips
Hi Alexander, On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, at 15:54:40 [GMT+0200] (which was 23:54:40 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: You have to install the pcwize smilies. http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/PCWSmileys.php Thanks. In which directory should they be installed? -- John Phillips, Sydney, Australia

Re: [bug] Problem with reply to a windows-1258 charset message

2005-12-27 Thread Tom Plunket
Stephane Bouvard [ML] wrote: I join with this mail a really little example, just try : open it in TheBat! and try to reply... Open what? The only attachment is this part.txt which is the list signature lines. -tom! -- Current version is

Re: Bug: major severity, high priority - how long?

2005-12-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Marten! On Friday, December 02, 2005, 3:30 AM, you wrote: 'Wait for the next release?' Indeed, but in order to restore the functionality of templates I have had to go back to a version in which the connection centre download is broken such that it hangs - can I expect that in the next

Re: Bug: major severity, high priority - how long?

2005-12-02 Thread Thomas F
Hello Marten, On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 09:30:40 + GMT (02/12/2005, 16:30 +0700 GMT), Marten Gallagher wrote: You surely have to set priorites. Anyway, it's a beta MG What are you talking about? I have never ever used a beta of TB - I'm MG talking about a function that worked for ages, then

Re: Bug: major severity, high priority - how long?

2005-12-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Marten, On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 07:56:03 + GMT (01/12/2005, 14:56 +0700 GMT), Marten Gallagher wrote: MG The priority was raised to high by a TB person as far as I can tell: MG quote MG Marek Mikus - 29 Nov 2005 11:08 MG -- MG confirm and priority increased MG

Re: Bug: major severity, high priority - how long?

2005-12-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Marten, On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:49:56 + GMT (02/12/2005, 01:49 +0700 GMT), Marten Gallagher wrote: MG I'm sorry but that is arrant tosh! You produce a product with functions - MG you then (inadvertently admittedly) break it - you can't hide behind well MG not many people use that

Re: Bug: major severity, high priority - how long?

2005-11-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Marten, On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:06:25 + GMT (01/12/2005, 02:06 +0700 GMT), Marten Gallagher wrote: MG If a bug is listed as: MG Reproducibility:always MG Severity: major MG Priority: high MG Status: confirmed MG How

RE: Bug in MAILTO link handling

2005-11-12 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello Alexander, Saturday, November 12, 2005, 11:09:41 AM, you wrote: Hello Jurgen Haug everyone else, I now filed the bugreport for this problem: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5332 merci bien -- Best regards, Jürgen :eu-flag3: :de-bw: :safaribears: In Europe you have watches

Re: Bug TB : Color Groups doesn't work anymore !

2005-06-21 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello WilWilWil everyone else, on 21-Jun-2005 at 22:07 you (WilWilWil) wrote: ASK I've created an entry in BT. Please add your confirmations: ASK https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4801 Thanks. I confirm as soon as I can remember my account and pswd ! ;-) Don't worry. There's a number of

Re: Bug TB : Color Groups doesn't work anymore !

2005-06-20 Thread Miroslav Florensen
Hello WilWilWil, To work fine, I use groups of colors for the tree of folders. Since version 3.5, the color functions for tuning a folder, thanks to the option Color Groups, works, but the underlined, bold, and the italic doesn’t work anymore !!! confirmed. In version v3.0.2.10 the color

Re: Bug TB : Color Groups doesn't work anymore !

2005-06-20 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello WilWilWil everyone else, on 20-Jun-2005 at 19:24 you (WilWilWil) wrote: To work fine, I use groups of colors for the tree of folders. Since version 3.5, the color functions for tuning a folder, thanks to the option Color Groups, works, but the underlined, bold, and the italic doesn’t

Re: bug report WAS: 3.5 bug in sorting office?

2005-05-15 Thread Mary Bull
Hello djb! On Sunday, May 15, 2005, 5:08 AM, you wrote: Does anyone happen to know if the inbuilt bug-reporting email set-up actually works? (HELPFeedbackBug Report) Or does one have to go through the web-site? To my best knowledge, it does not work. One must go here and register first, and

Re: bug report WAS: 3.5 bug in sorting office?

2005-05-15 Thread djb
It's a complex site. If you have difficulties navigating it, please report and ask here. Either I or some other fellow subscriber will try to help you. Thankyou Mary. Bug reported here: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4657 -- David [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug Report: /importf=The Bat!

2004-10-23 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Bill, On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 17:23:30 -0500GMT (24-10-2004, 0:23 +0200, where I live), you wrote: BM Perhaps there should be a %FullFolderName macro? IIRC that has been asked before, don't know whether it's on the wish list or not. Dunno whether it's on the wish list, I certainly agree that

Re: Bug? Failure of Macros to Expand

2004-10-21 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Thu 21-Oct-04 7:16pm -0400, Peter Ouwehand wrote: I assume that was meant to be 'Run external action'. Comments in that pop-up clearly state its possible to use macros to pass message properties as parameters. Yes. A work-a-round was posted in TBBETA. See mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best

Re: BUG: TB 2.12.03: CC hanging, not releasing dialup connection

2004-09-02 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello TBUDL, on Thu, 2. Sep 2004 at 19:58:19 +0200 I wrote: *update* screenshot converted to 2 colors because of file size. let me see you stripped.. :/ -- shinE! GnuPG/PGP key: http://thequod.de/danielhahler.asc ICQ#152282665 Random software tip: [***] jEdit, for software development

Re: bug: TB keeps asking to set as default mailer on XP non-admin account

2004-08-30 Thread Chris
dAniel hAhler @ 2004-Aug-30 7:26:19 PM bug: TB keeps asking to set as default mailer on XP non-admin account mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] after giving the users on this computer user-only permissions and re-installing the Office XP suite again the default E-Mail client was Outlook (forgot to

Re: bug: AV

2004-08-18 Thread Rick Friedman
On Wednesday, August 18, 2004, 12:39:00 PM, dAniel wrote: dh Hello TBUDL, dh after startup.. dh --- dh The Bat! dh --- dh Access violation at address 004043DE in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address . dh --- dh OK

Re: bug: AV

2004-08-18 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello TBUDL, on Wed, 18. Aug 2004 at 14:14:42 -0400 Rick Friedman wrote: dh Access violation at address 004043DE in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address . I also get this occasionally. on the same address(es)? -- shinE! GnuPG/PGP key: http://thequod.de/danielhahler.asc

Re: Bug Reporting

2004-07-20 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Joseph, @21-Jul-2004, 00:06 + (21-Jul 01:06 UK time) Joseph N. said: What's the address for reporting bugs? The BugTraq system. Please read the TBUDLinfo page for more information. -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone --List moderator and fellow end user TB! v2.12.1 on Windows XP

Re: Bug?: TB! truncating lines exceeding 1010 characters (was: Re: Character Line Limit)

2004-07-14 Thread Mike Dillinger
--- Original Message From: Allie Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 at 04:34AM PDT Hi Allie, AM I can't duplicate this problem. I just sent myself a test message that AM was a single line of text with 4231 characters. Not a character lost. AM Maybe it's a server problem? I

Re: bug report - Runtime error when starting TB ver 2.11.x

2004-06-12 Thread Eric
TF The error message does not mean TB, it means one of TF the plugins. I guess BayesIt. Many people have TF reported erroneous behaviour with this plugin. I wish TF it weren't included in the distro. Uninstall BayesIt TF from your TB, And in case I need to do that, just how does one uninstall

Re: bug report - Runtime error when starting TB ver 2.11.x

2004-06-12 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Eric, On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 13:11:05 +0100 GMT (12/06/2004, 19:11 +0700 GMT), Eric wrote: E And in case I need to do that, just how does one uninstall E BayesIt? Options / Preferences / PlugIns. You can delete it there. I understand you have to close and reopen TB afterwards. -- Cheers,

Re: bug report - Runtime error when starting TB ver 2.11.x

2004-06-11 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello SL, On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 08:20:32 +1000 GMT (12/06/2004, 05:20 +0700 GMT), SL wrote: S Questions and comments: S 1. I have no idea what runtime or runtime error messages (from S 'Microsoft Virtual C++ Library) mean. Runtime error means an error ocurred while the program was running (as

Re: bug: deleted messages stay in Virtual Folder

2004-06-05 Thread MAU
Hello dAniel, The problem I'm experiencing is that the mails stay in the VF after I delete them from Inbox. Does it still show if you do a manual Refresh of the VF? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.10.03

Re: bug: deleted messages stay in Virtual Folder

2004-06-05 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello TBUDL, on Sat, 5. Jun 2004 at 20:54:08 +0200 MAU wrote: The problem I'm experiencing is that the mails stay in the VF after I delete them from Inbox. Does it still show if you do a manual Refresh of the VF? I tried that using 'esc' before, but with Folder-Refresh now it works. After

Re: bug: deleted messages stay in Virtual Folder

2004-06-05 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello MAU, On Sat, 5 Jun 2004 20:54:08 +0200 GMT (06/06/2004, 01:54 +0700 GMT), MAU wrote: The problem I'm experiencing is that the mails stay in the VF after I delete them from Inbox. M Does it still show if you do a manual Refresh of the VF? I just did that, and the VF seems to work

Re: Bug pressure?

2004-05-28 Thread michael
Quoting Allister Jenks [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello TBUDLers, Are there that many bugs that it takes two months to even get to this one? I have been in Software QA for over 25 years. I just want to say that a bug like you posted looks a great deal like a problem with your computer. I run

Re: Bug pressure?

2004-05-28 Thread Allister Jenks
Saturday, May 29, 2004, 3:54:38 AM, michael wrote: I have been in Software QA for over 25 years. I just want to say that a bug like you posted looks a great deal like a problem with your computer. I totally agree that's what it could be. My point was that pretty much nothing had been said in

Re: bug: Opening a file with TB!

2004-03-29 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello bats, on Mon, 29. Mar 2004 at 09:05:57 +0200 Roelof Otten wrote: DH what do you have there? DH (HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\The Bat! message file\shell\open\command) C:\PROGRAM FILES\THE BAT!\THEBAT.EXE /nologo /o:%1 I have that there, too. And opening .msg/.vcf files does actually work. And even

Re: bug: Opening a file with TB!

2004-03-29 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello bats, on Mon, 29. Mar 2004 at 20:35:50 +0100 Martin Webster wrote: [..] What has all this got to do with the problem in hand? Debuggin'.. :) This is the first time you've mentioned vCards and other legitimate file associations. And don't be so quick deleting those registry entries!

Re: BUG: QT manager gets lost if you close edit mail msg window where you pressed ctrl-shift-Q

2004-03-28 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello bats, on Mon, 1. Mar 2004 at 03:57:00 +0100 I wrote: To reproduce: - open edit mail message window - press ctrl-shift-q - close the edit mail message window (QT manager will also disappear) - press ctrl-shift-q (TB main window will flash, but no QT manager) got an ID:

Re: bug: Opening a file with TB!

2004-03-28 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello bats, on Sun, 28. Mar 2004 at 11:40:01 +0100 Martin Webster wrote: DH Not with me. Also not with 2.04.07. I think this is down to the way you've got XP handling files. I think it's because the Open command includes the /o: before the filename (%1). DH It's regardless of size, but does

Re: bug: Opening a file with TB!

2004-03-28 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello bats, on Sun, 28. Mar 2004 at 11:32:35 +0100 Martin Webster wrote: DH What do you (and Martin) have in DH HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Applications\thebat.exe\shell\open\command ? DH With me its D:\Programme\thebat\thebat.exe /nologo /o:%1 and I DH wonder what that /o switch is.. C:\Program

Re: bug: Opening a file with TB!

2004-03-28 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello bats, on Sun, 28. Mar 2004 at 11:32:35 +0100 Martin Webster wrote: DH What do you (and Martin) have in DH HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Applications\thebat.exe\shell\open\command ? DH With me its D:\Programme\thebat\thebat.exe /nologo /o:%1 and I DH wonder what that /o switch is.. C:\Program

Re: bug: Opening a file with TB!

2004-03-28 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo dAniel, On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 03:37:44 +0200GMT (28-3-04, 3:37 +0100, where I live), you wrote: DH What do you (and Martin) have in DH HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Applications\thebat.exe\shell\open\command ? I don't have such a key. -- Groetjes, Roelof

Re: bug: Opening a file with TB!

2004-03-28 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello bats, on Sun, 28. Mar 2004 at 23:16:45 +0200 Roelof Otten wrote: DH What do you (and Martin) have in DH HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Applications\thebat.exe\shell\open\command ? I don't have such a key. It will be created when using Open with to open a file with TB. I suppose this will be derived

Re: bug: Opening a file with TB!

2004-03-28 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo dAniel, On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 23:49:13 +0200GMT (28-3-04, 23:49 +0100, where I live), you wrote: DH What do you (and Martin) have in DH HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Applications\thebat.exe\shell\open\command ? I don't have such a key. DH It will be created when using Open with to open a file with TB.

Re: bug: Opening a file with TB!

2004-03-27 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo dAniel, On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 23:31:09 +0100GMT (27-3-04, 23:31 +0100, where I live), you wrote: DH I just tried opening a .TBB file with thebat (from Window's Open With DH IMO should simply say Unknown filetype when it's opened with a file DH and does not know how to handle it. Another

Re: bug: Opening a file with TB!

2004-03-27 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello bats, on Sat, 27. Mar 2004 at 23:31:53 + Martin Webster wrote: DH IMO should simply say Unknown filetype when it's opened with a file DH and does not know how to handle it. But Windows deals with the unknown file type. I guess you've gone on and selected a program from the list

Re: bug: Opening a file with TB!

2004-03-27 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello bats, on Sun, 28. Mar 2004 at 00:36:17 +0100 Roelof Otten wrote: Tried it over here, with TB 2.04.07, not with the beta you're using, under Win98. TB created a new message with the .TBB file attached. I also tried it with 2.04.07 before, the same result. I now tried calling thebat.exe

Re: BUG: Having an account with LAN network settings in Check All stack causes failure of SEND for Dial-Up account

2004-03-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello dAniel, On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 16:04:54 +0100 GMT (07/03/2004, 22:04 +0700 GMT), dAniel hAhler wrote: It is not a bug, you tell TB to act the way it does. Solution: Take the tickmark off. No it does not. I tell him to use LAN for this special hamster-account. For all others it should use

Re: BUG: Having an account with LAN network settings in Check All stack causes failure of SEND for Dial-Up account

2004-03-08 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello bats, on Mon, 8. Mar 2004 at 22:03:43 +0700 Thomas Fernandez wrote: TB can only handle one internet connection at the time, so that when it believes a LAN connection has been established, it won't dial out for the other accounts. but that would mean that also the FETCH tasks for dialup

Re: BUG: Having an account with LAN network settings in Check All stack causes failure of SEND for Dial-Up account

2004-03-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello dAniel, On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 16:56:06 +0100 GMT (08/03/2004, 22:56 +0700 GMT), dAniel hAhler wrote: It appears that is not the setup in question: The hamster is on another computer on the same LAN, and there is no reason to establish an internet connection to check mail from there. Taking

Re: BUG: Having an account with LAN network settings in Check All stack causes failure of SEND for Dial-Up account

2004-03-07 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello bats, on Sun, 7. Mar 2004 at 13:36:09 +0700 Thomas Fernandez wrote: So the bug does not happen on your system and your local mailserver (if you have any) will be checked only after dialup is up. It doesn't happen, because it is not a bug and I have no tickmark. but the server will be

Re: BUG: Having an account with LAN network settings in Check All stack causes failure of SEND for Dial-Up account

2004-03-07 Thread Allie Martin
Daniel Hahler, [DH] wrote: DH If I now put a mail in my main (not hamster-local) account's DH outbox and press alt-f2 or f11 to check all accounts for mail the DH connection center comes up like in tb-cc1.jpg (see on BT: FETCH DH for all accounts, SEND for the one with mail), but after a tenth DH

Re: BUG: Having an account with LAN network settings in Check All stack causes failure of SEND for Dial-Up account

2004-03-07 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello bats, on Sun, 7. Mar 2004 at 10:31:51 -0500 Allie Martin wrote: I just wish to clear one thing up with you. If you have no message queued for sending, does a check all accounts operation occur without error, i.e., does the hamster-local account quickly check Hamster while the other

Re: BUG: Having an account with LAN network settings in Check All stack causes failure of SEND for Dial-Up account

2004-03-07 Thread Allie Martin
Daniel Hahler, [DH] wrote: DH Yup, exactly. Well, in that case I have to agree with you that what you're experiencing is buggy behaviour. DH Special network settings (LAN) for hamster-local: DH - immediate checking of hamster-local-account DH - BUT: failure of queued sending mail on all other

Re: BUG: Having an account with LAN network settings in Check All stack causes failure of SEND for Dial-Up account

2004-03-07 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello bats, on Sun, 7. Mar 2004 at 13:29:11 -0500 Allie Martin wrote: DH Yup, exactly. Well, in that case I have to agree with you that what you're experiencing is buggy behaviour. Puh, I'm relieved.. :) Your setup is rather unusual in that most who run their own mailserver will just do

Re: SPF MS eMail CallerID scheme (was Re: BUG: Having an account with LAN network settings in Check All stack causes failure of SEND for Dial-Up account)

2004-03-07 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Sunday, March 7, 2004, 2:00 PM, you wrote: GS Somewhat related is the new initiatives to validate servers. These take GS the form of SPF (Sender Policy Framework see http://spf.pobox.com) GS Microsoft's patented eMail CallerID scheme. GS How do you think these new initiatives will effect

Re: SPF MS eMail CallerID scheme (was Re: BUG: Having an account with LAN network settings in Check All stack causes failure of SEND for Dial-Up account)

2004-03-07 Thread Johannes Posel
Dear Greg, On 20:00 07.03.2004, you [Greg Strong] wrote... How do you think these new initiatives will effect those who run their own email servers /or those who use their ISP to send mail for their owned domains. It (SPF) will affect you if you send mails using your own server, but with the

Re: BUG: Having an account with LAN network settings in Check All stack causes failure of SEND for Dial-Up account

2004-03-06 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello dAniel, On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 05:51:43 +0100 GMT (06/03/2004, 11:51 +0700 GMT), dAniel hAhler wrote: The account hamster-local has alternative network settings (Local Area Network or manual connection). All other accounts use the same dial-up connection. Where do you set this? Over here,

Re: BUG: Having an account with LAN network settings in Check All stack causes failure of SEND for Dial-Up account

2004-03-06 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello bats, on Sat, 6. Mar 2004 at 16:48:57 +0700 Thomas Fernandez wrote: The account hamster-local has alternative network settings (Local Area Network or manual connection). All other accounts use the same dial-up connection. Where do you set this? Over here, it can be set once and is

Re: BUG: Having an account with LAN network settings in Check All stack causes failure of SEND for Dial-Up account

2004-03-06 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello dAniel, On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 18:48:30 +0100 GMT (07/03/2004, 00:48 +0700 GMT), dAniel hAhler wrote: Take the tickmark off Use specific That would help of course and I could of course set it to use the dialup connection, too - like all the other accounts. But it is a bug that has to

Re: BUG: Having an account with LAN network settings in Check All stack causes failure of SEND for Dial-Up account

2004-03-06 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello bats, on Sun, 7. Mar 2004 at 01:41:42 +0700 Thomas Fernandez wrote: So there is no connection at all. If you take the above-mentioned tickmark off, then only the main modul will try to dial out. If the hamster-account is set to dial out and the main setting says the same, there is

Re: BUG: Having an account with LAN network settings in Check All stack causes failure of SEND for Dial-Up account

2004-03-06 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello dAniel, On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 01:13:19 +0100 GMT (07/03/2004, 07:13 +0700 GMT), dAniel hAhler wrote: The hamster-account is set to LAN, not to a special connection. I repeat for the third time: Take the tickmark off and your problem will go away. Because of this the account will be

Re: BUG: Having an account with LAN network settings in Check All stack causes failure of SEND for Dial-Up account

2004-03-05 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello dAniel, On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 21:00:09 +0100 GMT (06/03/2004, 03:00 +0700 GMT), dAniel hAhler wrote: The account hamster-local has alternative network settings (Local Area Network or manual connection). All other accounts use the same dial-up connection. Where do you set this? Over here,

Re: BUG: Having an account with LAN network settings in Check All stack causes failure of SEND for Dial-Up account

2004-03-05 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello bats, on Sat, 6. Mar 2004 at 09:47:23 +0700 Thomas Fernandez wrote: The account hamster-local has alternative network settings (Local Area Network or manual connection). All other accounts use the same dial-up connection. Where do you set this? Over here, it can be set once and is

Re: BUG: QT manager gets lost if you close edit mail msg window where you pressed ctrl-shift-Q

2004-03-03 Thread Martin Schneider
Hello dAniel, on Sunday, February 29, 2004, 9:57:00 PM, dAniel hAhler wrote: To reproduce: - open edit mail message window - press ctrl-shift-q - close the edit mail message window (QT manager will also disappear) - press ctrl-shift-q (TB main window will flash, but no QT

Re: BUG: QT manager gets lost if you close edit mail msg window where you pressed ctrl-shift-Q

2004-03-02 Thread Robin Anson
On Mon 1 March 2004, 13:57:00 +1000, Daniel Hahler wrote: Hello bats, To reproduce: - open edit mail message window - press ctrl-shift-q - close the edit mail message window (QT manager will also disappear) - press ctrl-shift-q (TB main window will flash, but no QT manager)

Re: bug: OTime/ODate for new messages set to current date?

2004-02-23 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo dAniel, On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:58:20 +0100GMT (23-2-04, 14:58 +0100, where I live), you wrote: dh The help says that these macros are used for replies/forwards and dh therefor should be empty for new mails.. You might consider it a bug, but maybe it has something to do with the underlying

Re: bug: OTime/ODate for new messages set to current date?

2004-02-23 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello Roelof, on Mon, 23. Feb 2004 at 16:11:56 +0100 you wrote: R Apart from that, eg it's rather silly to use a macro that's intended R for replies and forwards in a new message template and then start R complaining that it doesn't act as you interpreted the help file R concerning the way way

Re: bug: hanging connection center on dialup: Dialling forever, when RAS is already dialling

2004-02-23 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello dAniel, On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:08:48 +0100 GMT (23/02/2004, 21:08 +0700 GMT), dAniel hAhler wrote: I use dialup with automatic disconnect. The problem is, when I'm already about to establish a RAS connection outside from TB and the connection centers starts before the computer is

  1   2   3   >