Hello MFPA,
On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 you wrote:
M Hi
M On Thursday 21 November 2013 at 11:00:39 PM, in
M mid:795717349.20131121170...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
In my case key folders got
relocated without my knowledge. Thanks to Miguel and
MFPA I knew *what* to look for and
Hi
On Tuesday 26 November 2013 at 2:40:51 PM, in
mid:1828685907.20131126084...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
I can see your point. However, there could be
exceptions. My MAIL folder is in my DOCUMENTS folder.
This makes no sense to me.
That's just the default; you can put it where
Hi
On Monday 25 November 2013 at 9:54:10 AM, in
mid:367455330.20131125095...@silverstones.com, Marck Pearlstone
wrote:
While it is true that Leif has moved on from TB and the
discussion lists, the roguemoticons site is still up
and running. I am still an admin on the approval of new
Dear Mfpa,
@25-Nov-2013, 02:05 MFPA [M] in
mid:1263609032.20131125020536@my_localhost said to Rick:
... snip
essentially, it no one is keeping it updated,
M I suspect Leif would be willing to allow somebody else to take it on,
M if somebody came forward with the time, inclination, and
Hi
On Thursday 21 November 2013 at 11:00:39 PM, in
mid:795717349.20131121170...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
In my case key folders got
relocated without my knowledge. Thanks to Miguel and
MFPA I knew *what* to look for and where they were
supposed to be. Once I found them
Hello Rick,
On Thursday, November 21, 2013 you wrote:
R I think Roguemoticons are dead for all practical purposes. I wouldn't blame
R Ritlabs if they removed it - no sense in releasing a program with a program
R feature that CANNOT be fixed.
I don't know that it CANNOT be fixed unless it's the
Hi Rick
On Thursday 21 November 2013 at 6:54:26 PM, you wrote:
I think Roguemoticons are dead for all practical purposes.
They certainly have a limited and not-increasing userbase (of about
150). But that is partly down to not being publicised, as well as
being unsupported by any other
Hello MFPA,
On Thursday, November 21, 2013 you wrote:
M Hi
M On Wednesday 20 November 2013 at 1:20:38 AM, in
M mid:93269535.20131119192...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
So, once again my profound thanks to you and Miguel for
all the help. Nice to see you both again.
M Glad to help.
M Did you ever follow up on updating your Rogues photo, which you M
mentioned in May last year? I had another Someone new has joined or M
updated their image on Roguemoticons email today (which makes five in M 18
months) saying you had joined or updated, but the zip file still M contains
the
On 11/19/2013 you wrote:
Neither the text file pcwsmileys.msl nor the folder pcwimages exist
anywhere
on my computer.
CANCEL RED ALERT! File/folder found! I have a program called SEARCH
EVERYTHING
(http://www.voidtools.com/) which will find anything you type in it's search
bar
(I
Hi
On Thursday 21 November 2013 at 5:37:04 PM, in
mid:1325241372.20131121113...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
I too have notifications of new rogue photos ticked and
I can't remember the last time I got one except for my
own yesterday.
Yours on 18/05/2013, 05/06/2012, 28/05/2012,
Hi
On Wednesday 20 November 2013 at 1:20:38 AM, in
mid:93269535.20131119192...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
So, once again my profound thanks to you and Miguel for
all the help. Nice to see you both again.
Glad to help.
Did you ever follow up on updating your Rogues photo, which
containing :banana: it simply shows up as
COLONbananaCOLON. I think this corresponds to my no
longer seeing country flags in others messages.
M So basic smileys like :-) work for you, but pcwsmileys like :banana:
M don't.
Correct.
M Does your %ProgramFiles%\The Bat!\Images folder contain a text
Hello TBUD Listers,
Well, it's happened again. Several months ago (after a TB upgrade IIRC)
roguemoticons and smileys stopped working. This failure has finally reached the
point of annoyance where I feel the need to do something about it. I scoured
the archives for about an hour looking
think this corresponds to my no
longer seeing country flags in others messages.
So basic smileys like :-) work for you, but pcwsmileys like :banana:
don't.
Does your %ProgramFiles%\The Bat!\Images folder contain a text file
called pcwsmileys.msl as well as a folder called pcwimages (and
does
Hello Peter,
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 19:33:32 +0100 GMT (12/02/2007, 01:33 +0700 GMT),
Peter Meyns wrote:
PM [RegKey left by Voyager]
As a matter of courtesy, I prefer to delete this key after using a
friend's computer.
Gr So, I should use regedit, search for Voyager and delete the key?
PM In
Hi Gmail_mcristina.ramos,
I don't consider this off topic, so I crosspost my reply to TBUDL. :)
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:47:54 +GMT you wrote on TBOT:
Gr I guess this is a repeated question, but can anyone tell me whether
Gr we can use Rogues and Smileys in Voyager.
Sure we can! :)) Just
Hi Peter,
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, at 17:51:49 [GMT +0100] (which was 16:51 where I
live) you wrote:
Sure we can! :)) Just make sure to have your Images folder with the
Rogues and Smileys copied to the Voyager directory on the stick, and
it will work as with The Bat!.
Done
As a matter
Hi Cristina,
on Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:07:50 +GMT (11.02.2007, 19:07 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
[RegKey left by Voyager]
As a matter of courtesy, I prefer to delete this key after using a
friend's computer.
Gr So, I should use regedit, search for Voyager and delete the key?
In principle,
the external links to local
ones. It's those local links that no longer work, just like the
smileys. It shows the Alt text in a box.
Smileys are working for me now, in v. 3.96.03 (BETA).
The developers announced when they began offering beta versions
3.96.xx for testing that they were proceeding
Mary Bull wrote:
MB So I hope the upcoming release will fix your txt2html.regexps
MB function, since it seemed to be associated with the Smiley-display
MB malfunction.
I was waiting for them to fix the crash on exit before I tried the
latest beta. I grabbed it last night and the images do
screen and smileys don't
work and the other kept the Christmas theme and smileys work.
--
Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.95.8 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
Current version is 3.95.06
Alexander S. Kunz schrieb:
Do you have the Christmas splash screen still. I installed the msi on
2 machines, one changed to the regular splash screen and smileys don't
work and the other kept the Christmas theme and smileys work.
And *both* are 3.95.08?!?
Yes they are indeed. One from
Hello Alexander!
On Friday, January 26, 2007, 11:58 AM, you wrote to Stuart Cuddy:
Do you have the Christmas splash screen still. I installed the msi on
2 machines, one changed to the regular splash screen and smileys don't
work and the other kept the Christmas theme and smileys work
that he installed teh *MSI* version twice, and
both are different, and that I find hard to believe...
Well, I believe him.
Because this msi install has given you the Smileys+Christmas Splash
Screen and me and a bunch of others the Regular Splash Screen+No
Smileys.
So, if on one of his machines he
On Friday, January 26, 2007, 12:27:15 PM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
But thats not what Stuart wrote. :-P He said he installed the MSI on
two machines, one showing the xmas splash, the other one not.
I have an installation with the minimal splash screen, which overrides
the default splash
Hello Alexander,
Friday, January 26, 2007, 11:58:57 AM, you wrote:
Do you have the Christmas splash screen still. I installed the msi on
2 machines, one changed to the regular splash screen and smileys don't
work and the other kept the Christmas theme and smileys work.
ASK And *both
Hello Alexander,
Friday, January 26, 2007, 12:47:16 PM, you wrote:
And both are 3.95.08?!?
Here they both are 3.95.08, except that they both also report
themselves in Help/About as 3.95.8.
Yes, I know that the MSI had the same version as the previous standalone
.exe - but Stuart wrote that
Hello Mary,
Friday, January 26, 2007, 2:18:34 PM, you wrote:
Stuart Cuddy is a very logical-minded person, not given to fantasy. :)
:'( Who's spreading this vicious rumor. :/
--
Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.95.8 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
to the regular
SC splash screen and smileys don't work and the other kept the
SC Christmas theme and smileys work.
Was that the same .msi?
--
Groetjes, Roelof
IBM: I've Been Misled
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat! 3.95.8
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
Hello Roelof,
Friday, January 26, 2007, 5:14:32 PM, you wrote:
SC I installed the msi on 2 machines, one changed to the regular
SC splash screen and smileys don't work and the other kept the
SC Christmas theme and smileys work.
RO Was that the same .msi?
As far as I know. It was the link
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK on Friday, January 26, 2007 at 00:19 you (George Mitchell) wrote:
I'm using the txt2html.regexps trick to turn some external image
links into links to images on my hard drive. This quit working
along with the smileys, so it's not just the .msl mechanism
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 at 14:28:45 -0600, Dwight wrote:
I have an installation with the minimal splash screen, which overrides
the default splash screens.
By minimal splash screen do you mean you are using the /NOLOGO
command line parameter, or is there something else that can be done
with splash
Hallo Mary,
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:40:14 -0600GMT (26-1-2007, 19:40 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
MB Perhaps those of you who were able to install msi 3.95.08 and keep
MB functioning Smileys can do so because of how you handled the original
MB Smiley code offerings, back in version 2.xx.
MB
On Friday, January 26, 2007, 5:42:53 PM, Robin Anson wrote:
By minimal splash screen do you mean you are using the /NOLOGO
command line parameter,
no
or is there something else that can be done with splash screens?
Is it, for example, possible to change the Xmas splash screen for
another
collection. I'm a child at heart, and I like the fun of
them.
Do you really need any of the functionality in this last version?
Think about it and revert to a version with smileys :)
MB Good suggestion.
MB However, I'm still beta testing, even though, for personal reasons, I
MB am no longer
Hello Peter!
On Thursday, January 25, 2007, 12:27 PM, you wrote:
MB ... I hate to see RitLabs abandon the .msl plus resident icons
MB and pics in The Bat!/Images feature.
MB And I think I am not alone in this.
No, you're not! :) I reverted to the last beta before this MSI for
that reason. It
Hi Mary,
on Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:39:31 -0600GMT (25.01.2007, 19:39 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
MB Smiley-image haters are simply more vocal, I think.
If I were a smiley-hater, I would just turn them off! :lol:
MB Some are very righteous about it, though. ;)
MB And Miguel's opinion is that this
Hello Peter!
On Thursday, January 25, 2007, 1:06 PM, you wrote:
MB ... Miguel's opinion is that this is deliberate coding by the
MB developers.
Why would they? I just started a new trial with a Linux partition,
and even KMail shows smilies. I haven't looked yet, if they can be
turned off at
Hello Peter and Everyone Else Interested in Proper Display of Smileys!
Please support:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6190
--
Best regards,
Mary
:Trill:
PCWSmileys Administrator
The Bat 3.95.8 on Windows XP Media Center Edition Service Pack 2
Hello Peter and Everyone Else Interested in Proper Display of Smileys!
Please support:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6190
P.S. Peter, please forgive my misspelling of your name in the subject
line of my first post in this thread. Was struggling with TB!'s desire
to over-ride my
on it.
Weren't the developers working on something along the lines of smart
tags like *bold*, /italics/ type thing. I wonder if this is where
it's coming from. Is it totally disregarding the .msl? i.e. if you use
:gdr:
Does that one work and it's just the uber common smileys that got
Hi Mary,
on Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:55:21 -0600GMT (25.01.2007, 20:55 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
MB P.S. Peter, please forgive my misspelling of your name in the subject
MB line of my first post in this thread. Was struggling with TB!'s desire
MB to over-ride my addressing in the To: field and
use
:gdr:
It's displayed as gdr (with the colons) and a rectangular box around
it.
Does that one work and it's just the uber common smileys that got
the different look?
None of them work. Neither the PCWIZE collection nor the DEFAULT
collection.
It's as if the .msl's ability to call the image
__ Geocaching:http://gps.PCWize.com
( ) ( ___)(_ _)( ___) TBUDP Wiki Site: http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/tbudp
)(__ )__) _)(_ )__) Roguemoticons Smileys:http://PCWize.com/thebat
()()()(__)PHP Tutorials and snippets:http
Hello Peter!
On Thursday, January 25, 2007, 2:02 PM, you wrote:
MB P.S. Peter, please forgive my misspelling of your name in the subject
MB line of my first post in this thread. Was struggling with TB!'s desire
MB to over-ride my addressing in the To: field and messed up big time.
MB Sorry. My
Charlene. grin
It's from tbbeta mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The changes mentioned relate to Windows Vista Manager, to label
placement in the SMTP authentication dialogue, and a larger window for
the installation wizard.
That's it. Not a word about Smileys or tags.
So, I think something else
Mary Bull wrote:
Does that one work and it's just the uber common smileys that got
the different look?
MB None of them work. Neither the PCWIZE collection nor the DEFAULT
MB collection.
MB It's as if the .msl's ability to call the image were broken.
I think that's it exactly. My guess would
Hallo Mary,
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:23:11 -0600GMT (25-1-2007, 20:23 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
MB Alex did a custom install of v. 3.95.08 msi, and chose to install only
MB the .exe.
I chose the full install
MB Then he put his reserved Smiley files back in manually.
I didn't do that
MB
Hello Bob,
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 10:27:34 +1000 GMT (24/12/2005, 07:27 +0700 GMT),
Bob Morris wrote:
BM It is already included in the new help file - under the heading
BM Roguemoticons and PCWSmileys. I found it by doing a search for
BM emoticons.
I could neither find the heading nor did the
Hallo Thomas,
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 18:56:10 +0700GMT (24-12-2005, 12:56 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
BM Current version is 3.62.14
TF Marck must be on vacation. ;-)
And Leif and me asleep.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Function call to load Windows: here_piggy_piggy_piggy_piggy
The Bat! 3.64.01
Hallo Thomas,
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 18:56:10 +0700GMT (24-12-2005, 12:56 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
BM It is already included in the new help file - under the heading
BM Roguemoticons and PCWSmileys. I found it by doing a search for
BM emoticons.
TF I could neither find the heading nor did
Hello Roelof,
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 13:08:49 +0100 GMT (24/12/2005, 19:08 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
RO Well, that's the version I'm using and I could find it too, while
RO searching for 'emoticons'
RO But you can find it via contents too:
RO Advanced Use - Roguemoticons and PCSmileys
Dear Thomas,
@24-Dec-2005, 18:56 +0700 (24-Dec 11:56 here) Thomas Fernandez [TF] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Bob:
TF I could neither find the heading nor did the search come up with ay
TF result. Iam using the_bazt.chm dated 19/12/05. Is there a newer
TF version?
BM Current version is
Hello Marck,
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 14:54:34 + GMT (24/12/2005, 21:54 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
TF Marck must be on vacation. ;-)
MDP No, but had completely forgotten about it!! Thanks for the heads up,
MDP guys.
You mean there a more important things in the world? confused
--
Hello tbudl,
I have moved to a new computer and my smileys aren't working. Could
someone remind me where the info is. I have the smileys downloaded
but they don't show up. BTW the info does not appear to be in the
new help file.
--
Stuart mailto:[EMAIL
Hello Stuart!
On Friday, December 23, 2005, 8:57 AM, you wrote:
I have moved to a new computer and my smileys aren't working. Could
someone remind me where the info is. I have the smileys downloaded
but they don't show up. BTW the info does not appear to be in the
new help file.
Get
Howdy Mary,
Friday, December 23, 2005, 3:42:31 PM, Mary wrotened:
I have moved to a new computer and my smileys aren't working. Could
someone remind me where the info is. I have the smileys downloaded
but they don't show up. BTW the info does not appear to be in the
new help file.
Mary Get
Hello Ben!
On Friday, December 23, 2005, 9:50 AM, you wrote:
In order to view smilies you have to read your mail in the RTF format.
Well, that's what being sure Use Plain Text Viewer isn't ticked in
the right-click (context) menu will ensure.
It can also be set in Options/Preferences, of
Hello Mary,
Friday, December 23, 2005, 9:42:31 AM, you wrote:
MB Get the right-click context menu from the message body while you're
MB focused on that incoming message. Be sure Use Plain Text Viewer is
MB not ticked. Be sure the box beside Smileys *is* ticked.
Yes this was the problem
Hello Stuart!
On Friday, December 23, 2005, 5:24 PM, you wrote:
MB Get the right-click context menu from the message body while
MB you're focused on that incoming message. Be sure Use Plain
MB Text Viewer is not ticked. Be sure the box beside Smileys *is*
MB ticked.
Yes this was the problem
G'day Mary,
Saturday, December 24, 2005, 1:42:31 AM, you wrote:
Hello Stuart!
On Friday, December 23, 2005, 8:57 AM, you wrote:
Very sorry to hear of omission of Smileys settings instructions in the
new Help File.
Perhaps that can be remedied next year.
It is already included
Hello Bob,
Friday, December 23, 2005, 6:27:34 PM, you wrote:
It is already included in the new help file - under the heading
Roguemoticons and PCWSmileys. I found it by doing a search for
emoticons.
Hmmm, a search on Smileys did not work. Well at least it is there, I
guess it just needs
Hello Bob!
On Friday, December 23, 2005, 6:27 PM, you wrote:
Very sorry to hear of omission of Smileys settings instructions in the
new Help File.
Perhaps that can be remedied next year.
It is already included in the new help file - under the heading
Roguemoticons and PCWSmileys. I found
Hello Stuart!
On Friday, December 23, 2005, 6:29 PM, you wrote:
It is already included in the new help file - under the heading
Roguemoticons and PCWSmileys. I found it by doing a search for
emoticons.
Hmmm, a search on Smileys did not work. Well at least it is there, I
guess it just
Sometimes (and that refers currently only to some messages on TBOT),
I switch to the RTV in order to see the smileys
How sad.
--
Regards,
Clive Taylor
TheBat!:3.51.9
Windows XP: Service Pack 2
Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL
Hello Peter,
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 09:41:53 +0200 GMT (31/07/2005, 14:41 +0700 GMT),
Peter Hampf wrote:
TF Where do I set Smileys on as default in the RTV?
PH Check Options/Preferences/ViewerEditor - Use smiley icons in HTML viewer
Thanks, it did the trick. :-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
CHRISTOPHER
Hello TBUDL,
I usually use the PTV. Sometimes (and that refers currently only to
some messages on TBOT), I switch to the RTV in order to see the
smileys. I do this by right-clicking in the message body.
Every time now I have to choose the RTV *and then* I have to choose
Smileys, because they're
Friday, April 29, 2005, Mica Mijatovic wrote:
Thursday, April 28, 2005, Mica Mijatovic wrote:
Then the chubby woman begin to sing, and that's it.
Oh, I thought they only did that in Wagner :-)
Nay. It's a different woman and a different song. (-:
[Has nothing with the saying. Although it
Hello Urban,
On 28 April 2005, 22:45 you wrote:
But there could be a big problem with * (any number of the preceeding
character). If we change the regexp from Martin to
^From.*(OWNER|owner)-(NOLIST|nolist)-.*\ *.* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Note the spaces around the first *.*)
you might see what
Friday, April 29, 2005, Martin Webster on tbudl wrote:
I doubt that there is a problem with the ideas described in this
thread... I looked at every message in Mozilla Thunderbird and each
renders correctly.
If there is no problem, then even I can think it would be a good idea.
Since I don't
Hello Urban,
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 23:46:20 +0200 GMT (29/04/2005, 04:46 +0700 GMT),
Urban wrote:
Then the chubby woman begin to sing, and that's it.
U Oh, I thought they only did that in Wagner :-)
No, this comes from baseball. There used to be an overweight singer
(forgot her name) who sang a
Hi
On Friday 29 April 2005 at 4:15:54 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Thomas Fernandez wrote:
No, this comes from baseball. There used to be an overweight singer
(forgot her name) who sang a certain song after important baseball
games in the US. So, the actual quote is: It ain't over until
Hello Thomas,
No, this comes from baseball. There used to be an overweight singer
(forgot her name) who sang a certain song after important baseball
games in the US. So, the actual quote is: It ain't over until the fat
lady sings, meaning that when a team was down a few points, it didn't
Hello rich,
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:00:11 -0400 GMT (29/04/2005, 23:00 +0700 GMT),
rich gregory wrote:
rg The quote is indeed It ain't over until the fat lady sings, but
rg background given above sound like urban legend.
rg I never in my life heard of anyone ever singing AFTER a game is over.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 28 Apr 2005,
@ @ at 23:46:20 +0200, when Urban wrote:
Thursday, April 28, 2005, Mica Mijatovic wrote:
Then the chubby woman begin to sing, and that's it.
Oh, I thought they
I have TB 3.0.1.33. The smileys dont work in HTML mails, the Use
of smileys in the options are checked. Any
idea?
MM no smiley is displayed? do You have Images folder in home directory?
I meant, that when I got a mail, I have smileys. But should not it
show up when I am composing a HTML
ON Thursday, April 28, 2005, 1:25:43 PM, you wrote:
TBs I meant, that when I got a mail, I have smileys. But should not it
TBs show up when I am composing a HTML message?
TBs My Sony cellphone detects when I am writing a smiley, and exchange it
TBs to a picture on-the-fly. Should not TB work
Hello The Bat! support everyone else,
on 28-Apr-2005 at 13:25 you (The Bat! support) wrote:
I meant, that when I got a mail, I have smileys. But should not it
show up when I am composing a HTML message?
IMO, smileys (sp? smilies?) are graphical elements and you can add them to
an HTML
Hello Alexander,
Thursday, April 28, 2005, 4:59:24 PM, you wrote:
IMO, smileys (sp? smilies?) are graphical elements and you can add them to
an HTML message as such yourself.
I'll only vote yes on this if I get *this* as bold and _that_ as underlined
and /those/ as italics auto-interpreted
Hello Alexander,
Thursday, April 28, 2005, 9:59:24 AM, you wrote:
I meant, that when I got a mail, I have smileys. But should not it
show up when I am composing a HTML message?
IMO, smileys (sp? smilies?) are graphical elements and you can add
them to an HTML message as such yourself.
I'll
Thursday, April 28, 2005, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
I'll only vote yes on this if I get *this* as bold and _that_ as
underlined and /those/ as italics auto-interpreted, too. ;-)
Hopefully, /that/ will never happen.
As long as space is a valid character (which it is) it would make
explaining
Thursday, April 28, 2005, Gerard wrote:
ON Thursday, April 28, 2005, 1:25:43 PM, you wrote:
TBs My Sony cellphone detects when I am writing a smiley, and exchange it
TBs to a picture on-the-fly. Should not TB work the same?
I agree with you on this. Specially with the not so standard smileys
Hello Urban,
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:38:50 +0200 GMT (28/04/2005, 22:38 +0700 GMT),
Urban wrote:
I'll only vote yes on this if I get *this* as bold and _that_ as
underlined and /those/ as italics auto-interpreted, too. ;-)
U Hopefully, /that/ will never happen.
I disagree. I hope it will
Hello Urban everyone else,
on 28-Apr-2005 at 17:38 you (Urban) wrote:
I'll only vote yes on this if I get *this* as bold and _that_ as
underlined and /those/ as italics auto-interpreted, too. ;-)
Hopefully, /that/ will never happen.
Are you referring to the /italics/ only, because the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 28 Apr 2005,
@ @ at 17:38:50 +0200, when Urban wrote:
Ah, a new tag in the (text) block! Yum!
A virtuoso is a musician with real high morals.
Yeah, they like to play long,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 28 Apr 2005,
@ @ at 18:43:02 +0200, when Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Hello Urban everyone else,
on 28-Apr-2005 at 17:38 you (Urban) wrote:
I'll only vote yes on this if I get
Hello Mica Mijatovic everyone else,
on 28-Apr-2005 at 19:00 you (Mica Mijatovic) wrote:
I'll only vote yes on this if I get *this* as bold and _that_ as
underlined and /those/ as italics auto-interpreted, too. ;-)
Hopefully, /that/ will never happen.
Are you referring to the /italics/
Hello Alexander,
On 28 April 2005, 18:17 you wrote:
I don't understand. Aren't asterisks and brackets also parts of the
regex syntax, and we anyway use them all in a regular text?
I don't understand, either. RegEx, to be precise. :-P
All I (think I) know is that the slash is used as an
Hi
On Thursday 28 April 2005 at 4:14:47 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jurgen Haug wrote:
IMO, smileys (sp? smilies?) are graphical elements and you can add them to
an HTML message as such yourself.
No opinion on graphical representation of smilies. One of the
(less-serious) reasons I try
Hello Martin Webster on tbudl everyone else,
on 28-Apr-2005 at 20:24 you (Martin Webster on tbudl) wrote:
All I (think I) know is that the slash is used as an escape character if
you want to match characters that normally are regex qualifiers. Like if
you really mean to match an asterisk
Hi
On Thursday 28 April 2005 at 8:51:51 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander S. Kunz
wrote:
Hmmm, then I don't know what the problem with /italics/ would be. :-)
I'm not sure Urban meant there was a problem with /italics/. My
reading was, he was emphasising the word that by indicating
it
ON Thursday, April 28, 2005, 5:38:50 PM, you wrote:
U Hopefully, /that/ will never happen.
U As long as space is a valid character (which it is) it would make
U explaining regexps a lot harder, for example.
If this was to be implemented it would never be possible to do in plain
text and would a
Thursday, April 28, 2005, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Are you referring to the /italics/ only, because the slash is a regex
escape character?
No, the slashes around that is supposed to be of the emphasis/italics kind.
--
Urban
It has recently been discovered that research causes cancer in
Thursday, April 28, 2005, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Actually, (to be precise :-) ) you would use the backslash \, e.g.
^From.*(OWNER|owner)-(NOLIST|nolist)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmmm, then I don't know what the problem with /italics/ would be. :-)
I've already answered the on /. Well it could be a
Thursday, April 28, 2005, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
U As long as space is a valid character (which it is) it would make
U explaining regexps a lot harder, for example.
So? I don't use regexes, but I do use the TB viewers.
Questions on regexps do pop up on the TB* lists from time to time. No
Thursday, April 28, 2005, Mica Mijatovic wrote:
Then the chubby woman begin to sing, and that's it.
Oh, I thought they only did that in Wagner :-)
--
Urban
No men who really think deeply about women retain a high opinion of
them; men either despise women or they have never thought seriously
wrote using the text editor, it (probably)
would influence how the text was shown in the RTV too, just like the
smileys work today.
--
Urban
Oliver Cromwell had a large red nose, but under it were deeply religious
feelings.
Current version
I have TB 3.0.1.33. The smileys dont work in HTML mails, the Use of smileys
in the options are checked. Any
idea?
Vili
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello all,
Wednesday, April 27, 2005, The Bat!support wrote:
I have TB 3.0.1.33. The smileys dont work in HTML mails, the Use
of smileys in the options are checked. Any
idea?
no smiley is displayed? do You have Images folder in home directory?
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat
1 - 100 of 297 matches
Mail list logo
