Under account properties, it gives me the option in the "Reply template"
if i want to use the "From name for Reply-To address". Is there any
way i can control this with a folder reply-to template, if so, how?
thanks
Alan.
--
--
Never mind, i figured it out. :)
Alan.
Alan Cummings wrote..
Under account properties, it gives me the option in the "Reply template"
if i want to use the "From name for Reply-To address". Is there any
way i can control this with a folder reply-to template, if so, how?
thanks
Alan.
On October 17, 2000, at 11:38:46 PM, Alan Cummings Wrote:
Never mind, i figured it out. :)
Please share your findings... :o)
Nick
N.J. Andriash [ TB! v1.47B7 | PGP 7.0 | Win 98 SE ]
Vancouver, B.C. Canada | PGP Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE
___
The problem was i was confusing myself about what the "Do not use from
name for reply-to address" actually did. I was thinking that it would
remove the from name from *every* replied message, instead of from the
messages that had a different reply-to address in it.
Alan.
Nick Andriash wrote..
Hello Katsmeow,
Responding to your article on Wed, 18 Oct 2000 at 00:36:31 GMT -0500
(which was 18/10/2000 12:36 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
K (No public reply necessary unless it is of general interest...but
K would appreciate assistance in getting unsubbed. I did receive the
K
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000 15:24:37 -0700
Januk Aggarwal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Januk Hello Thomas,
Januk
Januk On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 at 00:54:02 GMT +0800 (which was 9:54 AM
Januk where I live) witnesses say Thomas Fernandez typed:
Januk
Januk If
Hi Timothy,
...
TC My mouse now acts strangely when the Bat is running in the background,
TC along with freezups when I try to delete messages in folders.
Did you install/upgrade a virus scanner lately? I had a similar
effect when I installed a new McAfee version some months ago.
Switching to
Hi Martian,
MK I seem to be having a message
MK size limit problem. I can send messages less then 1K size, but
MK not larger (somewhere betweeen 1K and 1.5K). Any ideas why that
MK might be? I have a registered copy (the $35 version). Messages
MK larger than 1K seem to send the first part
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dieter,
On 15 October 2000 at 00:35:21 GMT +0200 Dieter Hummel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about "The Bat! and Exchange Server?" and made
these points:
DH Consider an email environment in a large bank or assurance e.g.
DH where everything
On Tuesday, October 17, 2000, 12:34:00 AM, net5zero wrote:
I have one account that when I compose a new message and click on
the send icon, it gets put in the Outbox instead. [I have checked
the setting; and it is set for immediate delivery.]
I assume you click on the "Send immediately"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 11:24:02 +0200
Wolfgang Kynast [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wolfgang Hi Timothy,
Wolfgang
Wolfgang ...
Wolfgang TC My mouse now acts strangely when the Bat is running in the background,
Wolfgang TC along with freezups when I try to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello BatListers,
If I search my AB on the parent folder [I have 4-5 group
subfolders] TB! does not return any name listed in a
subgroup. This doesn't make much sense to me. What am I doing
wrong or is this just
Cze.
Mgby mi podesa replaye z Rally Masters?
A poza tym jakie uwagi jak jedzi aby jedzi tak szybko... :)
Best regards
--
*** Michal Kozusznik *** MaXyM/PicSaintLoup ***
*** music *** Taekwon-do ***
*** [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
***
Hello TBUDL,
Is there a way to backup your filters and templates?
--
Best regards,
David mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| E-Mailed by The Bat! Version 1.45
| The World's Best E-Mail Client!!!
| Check it out at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Michal,
On 18 October 2000 at 18:17:23 GMT +0200 (which was 17:17 where I
live) Michal Kozusznik wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Rally Masters":
MK Cze.
MK Mgby mi podesa replaye z Rally Masters?
MK A poza tym jakie uwagi jak
Hello
Sorry for previous post. I don't know how it happened.
I'veclick on mail-to link on www-page. Two e-mail addresses was
included by TB!
Best regards
--
*** Michal Kozusznik *** MaXyM/PicSaintLoup ***
*** music *** Taekwon-do ***
*** [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Hi Wolfgang :)
Wednesday, October 18, 2000, 2:26:12 AM, you wrote:
See part 1
seams that for some reason the email server is timing out after
receiving the end of message command (the period on a line by
itself). I've tried sending that again after the first one, and
Hi Wolfgang :)
[snip]
WK Interesting to hear. I have the same problem when using the
WK companies exchange server. What server do you use?
I'm using our ISP server at escape.com. I've tried it on several
email servers, and they all seem to be the same. I wrote a program
in VB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Michal,
On 18 October 2000 at 18:55:14 GMT +0200 (which was 17:55 where I
live) Michal Kozusznik wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Sorry":
MK Sorry for previous post. I don't know how it happened. I've
MK click on mail-to link on
On 17-10-2000 at 19:27, Rich kindly wrote:
Timothy, on Tuesday, October 17, 2000, 11:13:38 AM, wrote:
Timothy It seems that the Bat is headed in the ways of Eudora and others in
Timothy that the developers continue to add more and more useless features
Timothy that does nothing more than make a
Hi Karin :)
Wednesday, October 18, 2000, 10:40:05 AM, you wrote:
[snip]
KS Hmm. TheBat is currently taking 11644 kb according to task
Its using about 8.1MB on mine. I like the Bat!, its fast and
stable. I still think it uses to much memory, but its not bad for
a windows
Hey, Karin,
Wednesday, October 18, 2000, 1:40:05 PM, you wrote:
Karin Hmm. TheBat is currently taking 11644 kb according to task
Karin manager. It's getting dangerously close to the 15 Mb that
Karin Eudora 4.3 used to demand.
Interesting...I have 2561 messages as I write this and the bat is
Hello Britta,
Thanks for the info, but I can't see that that's it. For one thing, I
am running across a network, not via dial-up. Though I do have TB set
to download mail automatically, I do not have the specific network
settings option that you mentioned enabled.
But I agree - it seems to
On 18-10-2000 at 20:52, Rich kindly wrote:
Karin, on Wednesday, October 18, 2000, 1:40:05 PM, wrote:
Karin Hmm. TheBat is currently taking 11644 kb according to task
Karin manager. It's getting dangerously close to the 15 Mb that
Karin Eudora 4.3 used to demand.
Interesting...I have 2561
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 19/10/2000 06:42 :
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 17:39:44 +0100
From: "Marck D. Pearlstone" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is getting to be a *bad* habit. Please try to avoid folder level
templates like *the plague* unless you are prepared to take much more
care over cursor
In Reference to "using %QUOTESTYLE" From Jan Rifkinson: "
J So I tried this by adding %QUOTESTYLE="F" as in "first name" to see
J what would happen *nothing* happened, i.e. nothing even got
J quoted. What am I doing wrong?
Did you remember to include the %QUOTES telling TB! where to place it?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Nick,
In a post time stamped 15:50:44 -0500 re: using %QUOTESTYLE
you wrote:
ND Did you remember to include the %QUOTES telling TB! where to place it?
Sorry, what do you mean by this?
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:52:33 -0400, Rich wrote:
[snip]
Karin Hmm. TheBat is currently taking 11644 kb according to task
Karin manager. It's getting dangerously close to the 15 Mb that
Karin Eudora 4.3 used to demand.
R Interesting...I have 2561
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Britta,
On 18 October 2000 at 09:35:48 GMT +1300 (which was 21:35 where I
live) Britta wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Rally Masters":
This is getting to be a *bad* habit. Please try to avoid folder
level templates like *the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:36:16 -0400, Jan Rifkinson wrote:
JR Since quotestyle seems to be set @ the account level via menu, I'm
JR assuming I can use the %QUOTESTYLE="expression" to override for
JR particular folders. So I tried this by adding
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:35:48 +1300, Britta wrote:
B umm ... I have to confess I've been using folder templates happily for
B some time. I've obviously missed previous discussions you have had
B about this ... would you mind just briefly
Hello Karin,
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 at 22:10:29 GMT +0200 (which was 1:10 PM
where I live) witnesses say Karin Spaink typed:
Althouigh that's much more then you report, it's also less than task
manager reported after having been up for a day. I do suspect some
memory leakage -- I'll keep
The problem is real, but it isn't a "bug" so much as a missing
feature. Outlook Express, to use one example, keeps two different
computers accessing the same IMAP account in perfect sync. That is,
not just "new" message headers are downloaded.
For example, let's say I create a new folder in OE
Hey, A,
Wednesday, October 18, 2000, 5:52:43 PM, you wrote:
A Very interesting. How much RAM does your system pack?
256MB also..
A For me TB! is usually hovering between 9 and 12MB of RAM, but I have a
A lot of RAM ... 256MB. TB!'s RAM usage tends to be somewhat dynamic.
Seems that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On October 18, 2000, at 2:20:08 PM, Marck D. Pearlstone Wrote:
You must be able to guarantee that you will check all addresses on new
messages, whether generated from the AB favourites list, from a generic
new message command or from an external
Hello Michal,
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 at 14:34:29 GMT +0200 (which was 5:34 AM
where I live) witnesses say Michal Kozusznik typed:
Do TB! supports more then one user using identities or Windows user
mechanism?
All of the above.
TB stores most settings in the Registry for exactly that
On 18-10-2000 at 23:52, A. Curtis Martin kindly wrote:
Karin Hmm. TheBat is currently taking 11644 kb according to task
Karin manager. It's getting dangerously close to the 15 Mb that
Karin Eudora 4.3 used to demand.
R Interesting...I have 2561 messages as I write this and the bat is
R using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi BatListers.
In a post time stamped 17:01:15 -0500 re: using %QUOTESTYLE
A. Curtis Martin wrote:
ACM The %quotestyle macro must precede the %quotes macro in your template.
ACM If not, it will not work. When ready to place the
Hello Jan,
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 at 19:50:02 GMT -0400 (which was 4:50 PM
where I live) witnesses say Jan Rifkinson typed:
And being greedy, anybody have any thoughts about my
"Address Book Search" post?
No, sorry. I noticed that your posts are being duplicated. I
Dear Januk,
On Wednesday, October 18, 2000 re: "using %QUOTESTYLE"
you wrote:
JA [...] I think you have an errant %To macro in your reply
JA template. Your reply template should have *no* %To macro [...]
So right you are. Sorry.
--
Jan Rifkinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Nick,
On 18 October 2000 at 15:51:28 GMT -0700 (which was 23:51 where I
live) Nick Andriash wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Rally Masters":
You must be able to guarantee that you will check all addresses on
new messages, whether
I've been testing The Bat! off an on for several days and am very
impressed with the software. However, I'm a user who likes for mail for
all accounts to share a common "destination" -- it all arrives in one
inbox for further sorting as I need it. Likewise with filters - I find it
cumbersome to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On October 18, 2000, at 5:42:44 PM, Marck D. Pearlstone Wrote:
That's not what happens. The new message has to arrive *before* you
reply. This bug is a complete sidetrack to the issue of template
location.
Ok, my apologies... I wasn't sure about
Hello Rev. Bob 'Bob' Crispen,
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000 13:25:44 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, October 18, 2000, 1:25:44 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Rev. Bob 'Bob' Crispen wrote:
(snipped a bit...)
I'm running Win98, not SE, upgraded from Win95, and I know enough
about Windows
Hello MartianRover KF6KNC,
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 12:00:19 -0700 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, October 19, 2000, 2:00:19 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
MartianRover KF6KNC wrote:
Hi Karin :)
Wednesday, October 18, 2000, 10:40:05 AM, you wrote:
[snip]
KS Hmm. TheBat is
Hello.
My MailTicker has mysteriously disappeared. I did have it configured to
"show automatically". Now, it will not show itself at all. I have
several folders that are configured to start he ticker. I have even
told it to "show always" - no good. Has anyone seen my mailticker??
I checked
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 18:59:15 -0400, Rich wrote:
A Very interesting. How much RAM does your system pack?
R 256MB also..
Wow! That was unexpected. g
A For me TB! is usually hovering between 9 and 12MB of RAM, but I have
A a lot of RAM ...
Hey, A,
Wednesday, October 18, 2000, 11:19:07 PM, you wrote:
A Wow! That's even more unexpected. A couple more things then. How many
A accounts do you have and approximately how many messages do you have in
A them? Do you store your attachments as a part of your messages or
A separately in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 19:05:42 -0700, Nick Andriash wrote:
NA Ok, my apologies... I wasn't sure about that. So, having moved all
NA my Templates over to the AB level, it looks like I am still
NA vulnerable to that bug. :o(
The bug that you're
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:51:28 -0700, Nick Andriash wrote:
NA Folder level Templates are by far more convenient to use.
It really depends on your situation and how you wish to manage your
mail. When I was using folder templates, I had to use two
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 21:37:19 -0400, Don Zeigler wrote:
DZ I've been testing The Bat! off an on for several days and am very
DZ impressed with the software. However, I'm a user who likes for mail
DZ for all accounts to share a common "destination"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On October 18, 2000, at 9:16:28 PM, A. Curtis Martin Wrote:
NA Ok, my apologies... I wasn't sure about that. So, having moved all
NA my Templates over to the AB level, it looks like I am still
NA vulnerable to that bug. :o(
AFAICK, this has
On October 18, 2000, at 9:45:51 PM, A. Curtis Martin Wrote:
NA With respect to circumventing the 'bugs' outlined above, perhaps.
NA However, TB!'s Address Book's finicky behaviour is well documented.
Ah now, Nick, that's not a fair statement now is it? :-)
No, in hindsight it's not. :o)
53 matches
Mail list logo
