define editor per folder (was: Is there a printout or sample of all smileys?)

Hello Lynn, > Would be very useful, though .. even it it had to be done > with a macro; I suppose it would be as useful as html templates > there is really only one place I'd like to > use these things, almost all of my correspondents would > faint on the spot if they suddenly started getting >

Re[2]: Is there a printout or sample of all smileys?

Sunday, September 5, 2004, 11:02:20 PM, you wrote: >> I suppose there's no way to define the editor >> you want to >> use for a particular folder .. ? RO> No Well, that's certainly clear enough :-) Would be very useful, though .. even it it had to be done with a macro; there is really only one

Re: Is there a printout or sample of all smileys?

Hello Lynn, > I'm not sure I'm smart enough to implement Robin's macro > (I've got as far as copying it to a text file, but the > docs are less than helpful .. they tell you how to write > them, but not where to put them), but I have a quandary. Options -> Quick templates -> Add (I ain't got TB

RE:Time for 2 Lists??

Hello expires30sept04, Sunday, September 5, 2004, 10:18:48 PM, you wrote: > Hi > Sunday, September 5, 2004, 3:18:20 PM, joeo wrote: >> HI, >> Maybe we should have a version 3 list and a version 2 list. > Perhaps posters could be requested to prefix their subject with > [v2] or [v3] if the di

Re[2]: Is there a printout or sample of all smileys?

Sunday, September 5, 2004, 9:12:48 PM, you wrote: MB> If you download this set, then Robin Anson's PShow MB> solution will work MB> to show you all the PCWSmileys and their handles. I'm not sure I'm smart enough to implement Robin's macro (I've got as far as copying it to a text file, but the do

The Bat! Rant

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Join The Bat Rant and yell all you want about the Bat! for free! [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- Michael L. Wilson, MBA Ecclesiastic Philosopher Critic Teacher :einsteinyoyo: == Using The Bat!

Re: Is there a printout or sample of all smileys?

Hello Michael! On Sunday, September 05, 2004, 10:24 PM, you wrote: MLW> Is there a way to preview all the smiley's so that I know what is MLW> available to me? One set of smileys, the Default set, downloaded with The Bat! Use the DShow filter that Robin Anson just posted in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Al

Re[2]: What is a natural email system?

Sunday, September 5, 2004, 6:58:00 PM, you wrote: MLW> That is true. I have been wondering, however, what MLW> did people do MLW> before they learned how to slice bread? Tear it off in chumks ... :-) But having it sliced for you was apparently a kind of ultimate! Kind of like 'reply quoted' :-

Re: How many Smileys?

On Mon 6 September 2004, 1:07:58 +1000, Doug Weller wrote: > I've read the .msl file and posted it to myself. Only a few of them > work, should I have done something else? Create a macro called Dshow with the following content ===[ Start QT Dshow ]=== %If:|%_FirstTime|<>|no|:|%- %_Fir

Is there a printout or sample of all smileys?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Is there a way to preview all the smiley's so that I know what is available to me? - -- Michael L. Wilson, MBA Ecclesiastic Philosopher Critic Teacher :einsteinyoyo: == Using The Bat! 3.0.0 Win

Re: What is a natural email system?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Lynn, On Sun, 5 Sep 2004, Lynn mused about "What is a natural email system?" (at least in part): L> Reply quoted ... best thing since sliced bread! That is true. I have been wondering, however, what did people do before they learned how to s

Re: Licence unhappiness?

Some time around 09/04/2004 19:14:22, I think I heard Roelof Otten say: > You might be overlooking Allie's point too. No, I understood his/her point (sorry, I have learned not to assume gender by names); hence my response. > Whereas what Allie said was that Ritlabs had to satisfy a lot of > c

Re: Licence unhappiness?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mica Mijatovic wrote: | I stick with v2.12 which works (still enough) fine (for me). I returned to Thunderbird (too many problems with nightly builds my fault for experimenting) and now have settled on Mozilla Suite while the dust settles. They too are

Mod: Cut mark (was: IMAP & new mail sound?)

Hallo Kovács, On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 16:12:51 +0200GMT (5-9-2004, 16:12 +0200, where I live), you wrote: KPG> -- KPG> Gabor KPG> KPG> Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: KPG> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html Note:

Mod: Cut mark (was: IMAP & new mail sound?)

Hallo Matthijs, On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 14:54:57 +0200GMT (5-9-2004, 14:54 +0200, where I live), you wrote: MVA> MVA> Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: MVA> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html Note: This moderator's

Mod: Cut mark (was: Time for 2 Lists??)

Hallo joeo, On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 10:18:20 -0400GMT (5-9-2004, 16:18 +0200, where I live), you wrote: J> -- J> Best Regards, Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated this reply. Please don't fe

Re: Time for 2 Lists??

Hallo joeo, On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 10:18:20 -0400GMT (5-9-2004, 16:18 +0200, where I live), you wrote: J> Maybe we should have a version 3 list and a version 2 list. My guess is that in a month or two hardly any items will be raised on v2, so it would be a waste of server space. For the same reason

Re: 3.0 screenshot?

Hallo Eric, On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 21:28:44 +0100GMT (5-9-2004, 22:28 +0200, where I live), you wrote: E> -- E> Eric I haven't a proper moderator template for this situation, but you've got two cut marks in your message and stubborn as TB is, it'll take only the last one as

Re: Licence unhappiness?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was Sun, 5 Sep 2004, at 14:41:47 -0600, @ @ when Jimmie Toney wrote: . > All of the above is one of the reasons that I am thinking of leaving > The Bat! I am beginning to think it is an unstable program,

Re[2]: 3.0 screenshot?

On Sunday, September 5, 2004, 5:38 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MP> Sunday, September 5, 2004, 9:27:47 PM, you wrote: PJ>> Is there a screenshot of TB! 3.0's new interface? MP> http://bat-mail.de.vu/tools.html MP> and choose "Original GLYPHs" Yes, it is an XP-style glyph set; curiosity satisfied

v3 Pro Install Problem

Hello TB User Discussion List, Although the install appeared to go nicely, the help comes up for v2! Also, when I marked a spam message as junk I got an error message that there was no learning plugin installed - but it placed the message in a special "Junk mail" folder. What gives? I'm sure I

Re: Adding Smilies

Hello Barry, Sunday, September 5, 2004, 4:08:19 PM, you wrote: B> Can someone please tell me where i unzip the smilies folder and MSL B> file too In your TB folder, usually C:\Program Files\The Bat!, is a folder called images. Unzip the ZIP into that folder. The .MSL will stay in the images folde

Adding Smilies

Hello , All Can someone please tell me where i unzip the smilies folder and MSL file too -- Best regards, Barry Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: [thebat] Re: v3.0 b1

Hi Alexander, ASK> For me, proper formatting of text-only messages, including the ability to ASK> re-flow quotes, is very important, and neither Outlook nor Opera's M2 or ASK> AK-Mail or Thunderbird (haven't tried others) has any function like that ASK> of TB's "ALT-L" keyboard shortcut - I'

Re[2]: Time for 2 Lists??

Hi Peter, PM> Hi joeo, PM> on Sun, 5 Sep 2004 10:18:20 -0400GMT, you wrote: j>> Maybe we should have a version 3 list and a version 2 list. j>> I am staying with version 2 and don't want to download all the version 3 stuff. PM> I can fully understand, as 2.12 is a well working version. PM> IM

Re[2]: 3.0 screenshot?

Hello Eric, Sunday, September 5, 2004, 10:28:44 PM, you wrote: E> On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 21:38:46 +0200 GMT(05/09/2004, 20:38 + GMT), Mark Partous wrote: MP>> http://bat-mail.de.vu/tools.html E> "The page cannot be found" :-( When I click on the URL, it opens as expected. When PowerMarks i

Re: Time for 2 Lists??

Hi joeo, on Sun, 5 Sep 2004 10:18:20 -0400GMT, you wrote: j> Maybe we should have a version 3 list and a version 2 list. j> I am staying with version 2 and don't want to download all the version 3 stuff. I can fully understand, as 2.12 is a well working version. IMHO everything about 3.x, albe

Re[2]: 3.0 screenshot?

Hello Eric, On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 you wrote in E> "The page cannot be found" :- Not much help for you but it's fine here. You cut mark's not working at the moment either :-( -- Regards, Richard | Using The Bat! 3.0 & SpamPal | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5.1 Service

Re[2]: TB! & PGP

Hi Sunday, September 5, 2004, 2:25:52 PM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: > Hello Ralph, > 05-Sep-2004 15:16, you wrote: >> If i download PGP 8.1 Freeware from PGP.com, will it work with >> TB? > I'm using PGP 8.03 freeware with TheBat! and have no problems. On the other hand I get Access Violation

Re: Time for 2 Lists??

On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 21:18:48 +0100 GMT(05/09/2004, 21:18 + GMT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: eycu> Perhaps posters could be requested to prefix their eycu> subject with [v2] or [v3] if the discussion is eycu> version-specific. eycu> At least you would know which to read and could eycu> filter ou

Re: 3.0 screenshot?

On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 21:38:46 +0200 GMT(05/09/2004, 20:38 + GMT), Mark Partous wrote: MP> http://bat-mail.de.vu/tools.html "The page cannot be found" :-( -- Eric Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 -- Best regards, Eric

Re: What is a natural email system?

Hello TBUDL, on Sun, 5. Sep 2004 at 11:40:02 +0300 9Val wrote: >a) Alt+arrows/PgUp/PgDn in message list scroll message As Alt-PgDn seems to be related to Space, which also scrolls down by one page, there is this very annoying behaviour, when it comes to the last page and it's been scrolled n

Re: Time for 2 Lists??

Hi Sunday, September 5, 2004, 3:18:20 PM, joeo wrote: > HI, > Maybe we should have a version 3 list and a version 2 list. Perhaps posters could be requested to prefix their subject with [v2] or [v3] if the discussion is version-specific. > I am staying with version 2 and don't want to download

Re: Re: Licence unhappiness?

> >>> Maybe RitLabs is not well suited to build a good e-mail >>> client capable of competing in todays market. > >Jack> IMO, until they learn how to spell the word D-O-C-U-M-E-N-T-A-T-I-O-N, >Jack> they're dead meat. > >Jack> And that would truly be a damn shame. > >That's one of the worst things

Re: 3.0 screenshot?

Hello P.Johnson, Sunday, September 5, 2004, 9:27:47 PM, you wrote: PJ> Is there a screenshot of TB! 3.0's new interface? It has been PJ> discussed a lot, and since installing 3.0 over 2.12 (and my alternate PJ> glyphs) did not change the look at all, I am interested to see what PJ> 3.0 looks lik

Re: Licence unhappiness?

Tony, [T] wrote: > there is no much use continuing this chat. I picked this up from early. It's OK. -- -= Allie =- The Bat!™ v3.0 · Windows XP Pro (Service Pack 2) . Oxymoron: Definite possibility Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL

3.0 screenshot?

Hello, Is there a screenshot of TB! 3.0's new interface? It has been discussed a lot, and since installing 3.0 over 2.12 (and my alternate glyphs) did not change the look at all, I am interested to see what 3.0 looks like. Thanks! -- Pat A Canadian in Houston Using The Bat! v3.0 on Windows XP

Re[5]: Glyphs

Sunday, September 5, 2004, 10:48:24 PM, you wrote: > Hello Mean, > Sunday, September 5, 2004, 6:27:00 PM, you wrote: MD>> Could someone send a glyphs.bmp file offlist. Would like to know its MD>> layout and try to make a few of my own. > You can find "a few" here: > http://bat-mail.de.vu/too

Re[2]: Summary of v3?

SC>> I don't usually use it either. I was referring to the message that SC>> keeps popping up when reading e-mail that says: SC>> ,- [ Invalid HTML ! ] TF> I haven't seen that since an early 2.x beta. TF>>> I use a Pentium 4 with 1,7GHz, 512MB RAM, Chinese Windows 98. What TF>>> else do you

Re: Licence unhappiness?

Hi Jack, Sunday, September 5, 2004, 7:44:57 PM, you wrote: Jack> Sunday, September 5, 2004, 10:43:52 AM, you wrote: >> Maybe RitLabs is not well suited to build a good e-mail >> client capable of competing in todays market. Jack> IMO, until they learn how to spell the word D-O-C-U-M-E-N-T-A-T-

Re[2]: What is a natural email system?

> You are allowed an opinion but we've read it at least 10 times today, > yesterday and the day before, and its starting to be a tiny winy bit of > annoying. Since when is there a quota on voicing one's opinion here? Not everyone is reading this list everyday, and maybe some will discover that th

Re[2]: Licence unhappiness?

Hello Allie, Saturday, September 4, 2004, 10:36:30 PM, you wrote: > Tony, [T] wrote: <.> And even if RitLabs hired 100 graphics artists TB! will never be main stream. It's targeted at a different market than Outlook. A market with people that are prepared to invest more time

Re: Summary of v3?

Hello Stuart, On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 12:18:13 -0500 GMT (06/09/2004, 00:18 +0700 GMT), Stuart Cuddy wrote: TF>> I wouldn't know about the HTML editor. I used it once for testing TF>> only. SC> I don't usually use it either. I was referring to the message that SC> keeps popping up when reading e-mail

Re: Glyphs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was Sun, 5 Sep 2004, at 21:57:00 +0530, @ @ when Mean Drake wrote: > Could someone send a glyphs.bmp file offlist. Would like to know its > layout and try to make a few of my own. There is one package with th

Re: New here, some questions.

Hello Leif! On Sunday, September 05, 2004, 10:53 AM, you wrote: A>> until things at your end are fixed (after all, its just the smiley A>> collection, not the submission page etc. etc.) LG> Not at all! Thank you very much for making it available to LG> everyone until I get these problems sorted

Re: Licence unhappiness?

Some time around 09/05/2004 09:42:17, I think I heard Marck D Pearlstone say: DJ>> as they are functional deficiencies, which impede use at the most, DJ>> and annoy and frustrate users at the least. > Incorrect. > Bugs are functional deficiencies that impede at worst, yes, but the > least effect

Re[4]: Glyphs

Hello Mean, Sunday, September 5, 2004, 6:27:00 PM, you wrote: MD> Could someone send a glyphs.bmp file offlist. Would like to know its MD> layout and try to make a few of my own. You can find "a few" here: http://bat-mail.de.vu/tools.html http://www.thebatworld.de/system/sections/index.php?op=l

Re[2]: Summary of v3?

Hello Thomas, Sunday, September 5, 2004, 9:54:47 AM, you wrote: TF> Stuart Cuddy wrote: TF>>> I not only still get these 100%-CPU-usage freezings, they have become TF>>> worse, SC>> I am one of those that does not have this problem with Windows 98 and Version 3, SC>> nor am I having problems wit

Re[3]: No Kaspersky AntiVirus Plug-in with The Bat! v3.0?

> In addition: > Kaspersky v5.0 doesn't come with plug-ins for any mailers anymore. > It now supports email-scanning just like AVK2004, NAV or any other by > using a kind of local proxy. > Mike Just as a side note, it was Kaspersky AV *PRO* 4.x which included this plugin. The "personal" version

Re[3]: Glyphs

Sunday, September 5, 2004, 9:31:19 PM, you wrote: > Sunday, September 5, 2004, 1:43:12 AM, you wrote: L>>> Didn't change the name. glyphs.bmp ... > Oh rats! found it ... I was half asleep last night > probably ... the filename had a number attached to it. > Thanks! > Lynn Could someone se

Re[4]: Recovering from a crash....

Hello Denis, Sunday, September 5, 2004, 5:31:15 PM, you wrote: >> (c) MS started to recommend individual configuration files some time >> back, Back to the old days where .ini was more common. The problem is that the .ini files are not always in the most logical place either. > If only they di

Re: v3.0 filter failure Update

Hello all, On Saturday, September 4, 2004, 11:06 AM, I wrote: PJ> I installed the trial version of 3.0 over my 2.12 easily... now the PJ> filters don't seem to be working. I've checked the sorting office (and PJ> think I will come to like the new format very much) and all my old PJ> filters are in

Re[2]: Glyphs

Sunday, September 5, 2004, 2:43:53 AM, you wrote: MM> If the glyphs.bmp is in the folder where your MM> thebat.exe is, and new MM> icons still doesn't show, then the only problem MM> could be with the .bmp MM> file. Try to use another one. (I can send you one I MM> use now, if you MM> wish.) Got

Re[2]: Glyphs

Sunday, September 5, 2004, 1:43:12 AM, you wrote: L>> Didn't change the name. glyphs.bmp ... Oh rats! found it ... I was half asleep last night probably ... the filename had a number attached to it. Thanks! Lynn -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]* * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * *

Re[2]: What is a natural email system?

Sunday, September 5, 2004, 1:40:02 AM, you wrote: 9> described often used by me 9> which I really miss in some other programs I 9> had (or tried) to use 9> (rss readers, and specialized for site news reader) Reply quoted ... best thing since sliced bread! Lynn -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]*

Re: New here, some questions.

Hello Alexander, Sunday, September 5, 2004, 9:46:42 AM, you wrote: A> until things at your end are fixed (after all, its just the smiley A> collection, not the submission page etc. etc.) Not at all! Thank you very much for making it available to everyone until I get these problems sorted out on m

Re: New here, some questions.

Hello Leif Gregory, 05-Sep-2004 16:53, you wrote: C>> Another thing: I've been trying to access the PCWIZE page I see in C>> many signatures, but I can't. > Nope it's not you. It's been down for about three days straight now. Mary sent me the archive via PM and I've just uploaded it to my websp

Re: Summary of v3?

Sunday, September 5, 2004, 11:05:21 AM, Doug Weller ( mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ) wrote in part: Pank>> That is true here also and has been ongoing since 2.11beta6, or there Pank>> about. DW> No problems with XP Pro SP1 here. And it seems that users using / above Win2K don't have this problem, but

Re: Licence unhappiness?

Some time around 09/05/2004 09:42:17, I think I heard Marck D Pearlstone say: DJ>> as they are functional deficiencies, which impede use at the most, DJ>> and annoy and frustrate users at the least. > Incorrect. > Bugs are functional deficiencies that impede at worst, yes, but the > least effect

Re[2]: behavior of ritlabs is dangerous !

> But who knows? Maybe they find that 1st of march is a good release date for > a major version, too? Make that 1st of April instead. It sure will look even more serious to anyone. -- Denis Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information

Re[3]: Recovering from a crash....

> (c) MS started to recommend individual configuration files some time > back, surely we all do what MS says without question ;-) If only they did it themselves! Do what I say, but not what I do... And more than that... their apps settings are scattered a bit everywhere in the Registry. I think t

How many Smileys?

Hello, I've read the .msl file and posted it to myself. Only a few of them work, should I have done something else? Thanks. Doug -- Doug Weller Moderator, sci.archaeology.moderated The Bat! 3.0 Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.co.uk Doug and Helen's Dogs: http://www.dougan

Re: Summary of v3?

Hi Pank, Sunday, September 5, 2004, 3:14:01 PM, you wrote: Pank> Sunday, September 5, 2004, 8:34:05 AM, Thomas Fernandez Pank> ( mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ) wrote in part: TF>> I not only still get these 100%-CPU-usage freezings, they have become TF>> worse, [ .. ] Pank> I can confirm that this s

Re: Time for 2 Lists??

Hello joeo, Sunday, September 5, 2004, 8:18:20 AM, you wrote: j> Maybe we should have a version 3 list and a version 2 list. No. j> I am staying with version 2 and don't want to download all the j> version 3 stuff. Your choice. -- __ ( ) ( ___)(_ _)( ___) TBUDL/BE

Re: Summary of v3?

Hello Stuart, On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 09:45:17 -0500 GMT (05/09/2004, 21:45 +0700 GMT), Stuart Cuddy wrote: TF>> I not only still get these 100%-CPU-usage freezings, they have become TF>> worse, SC> I am one of those that does not have this problem with Windows 98 and Version 3, SC> nor am I having p

Re: New here, some questions.

Hello Cristina, Sunday, September 5, 2004, 6:55:54 AM, you wrote: C> Another thing: I've been trying to access the PCWIZE page I see in C> many signatures, but I can't. Nope it's not you. It's been down for about three days straight now. First was a Qwest problem, but now there's something else.

Re[2]: Summary of v3?

Hello Thomas, Sunday, September 5, 2004, 7:34:05 AM, you wrote: TF> Allister Jenks wrote: AJ>> 1) The issues/bugs TF> I not only still get these 100%-CPU-usage freezings, they have become TF> worse, to the extent that I cannot upgrade until this particualr TF> problem is solved. I have had this

Re: Summary of v3?

Sunday, September 5, 2004, 8:34:05 AM, Thomas Fernandez ( mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ) wrote in part: TF> I not only still get these 100%-CPU-usage freezings, they have become TF> worse, [ .. ] I can confirm that this same problem is true here. TF> Others report memory leaks, which again cannot be c

Re: IMAP & new mail sound?

Matthijs Van Aalten, [MVA] wrote: > Except that when new mail arrives in my inbox, the sound is *not* > played. Silence is all I get. > Now I don't know if it's a bug in v3, if it's IMAP related... anyone > here who can help me? Or perhaps I'm just doing something wrong? This is a current limita

Re: IMAP & new mail sound?

Hello Martin, MW> It's a bug or not implemented and has been reported on the beta list... MW> not sure if a bug report is filed. It is not implemented yet -- 9Val Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Usin

Time for 2 Lists??

HI, Maybe we should have a version 3 list and a version 2 list. I am staying with version 2 and don't want to download all the version 3 stuff. Thank you for your attention! -- Best Regards, Joe O Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' inf

Re: IMAP & new mail sound?

> Now I don't know if it's a bug in v3, if it's IMAP related... anyone > here who can help me? Or perhaps I'm just doing something wrong? I have the very same problem with my IMAP... Also, if a virtual folder includes a search in an IMAP folder I have to manually refresh it - otherwise changes

Re: IMAP & new mail sound?

Hello Matthijs, On 05 September 2004, 14:54 +0200 (05/09/200413:54 local time) Matthijs van Aalten [MVA] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MVA> Except that when new mail arrives in my inbox, the sound is *not* MVA> played. Silence is all I get. It's a bug or not implemented and has been rep

Re[2]: BayesIt! and userrights

Hello Lars, Saturday, September 4, 2004, 6:26:04 PM, you wrote: >> Besides "adjusting" access for the plugin, you may need to 'fiddle' >> some other tb file rights as well. LS> I have tried to give the users write rights to the LS> installation folder of The Bat!. But that seems not to be the LS

Re: Toolbars

Hello M, On Sunday, September 5, 2004, 4:54:33 AM, you wrote: --- %< Quote --- M> Michael> What you actually read was that version 3 will someday, in the far, M> Michael> far, future The Bat might have downloadable, customizable toolbars. M> Meanin

Re: Licence unhappiness?

Dear Dz-Jay, @5-Sep-2004, 09:38 -0400 (05-Sep 14:38 UK time) DZ-Jay [DJ] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Roelof: DJ> >> Whereas what Allie said was that Ritlabs had to satisfy a lot of >> customers. Some need another UI, some need one bugfix or another. When >> you're a company and 100 users n

Re: What is a natural email system?

On Sunday, September 5, 2004 @ 8:53:10 PM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: [snips] >> Isn't it wonderful that you, too, are allowed an opinion. Of course, not >> everyone will share it. Alexander> You are allowed an opinion but we've read it at least 10 times today, Alexander> yesterday and the day bef

Re[2]: No Kaspersky AntiVirus Plug-in with The Bat! v3.0?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Salve Denis, Sunday, September 5, 2004, 3:17:07 PM: D> Actually, it is the Kaspersky AV which includes a plugin for TheBat! D> and not the other way around. The only plugin bundled with TheBat! D> so far has been the BayesIt one for spam filtering. Y

Re: TB! & PGP

Hello Ralph, 05-Sep-2004 15:16, you wrote: > i'm new to TB and even newer to using it with PGP. If i download PGP 8.1 > Freeware from PGP.com, will it work with TB? Does it make any sense to > use 8.1 or is the default PGP in TB good enough? I'm asking, because the > PGP-site says, that plugins f

Re: Licence unhappiness?

Some time around 09/04/2004 19:14:22, I think I heard Roelof Otten say: > You might be overlooking Allie's point too. No, I understood his/her point (sorry, I have learned not to assume gender by names); hence my response. > Whereas what Allie said was that Ritlabs had to satisfy a lot of > c

Re: TB! & PGP

Dear Ralph, @5-Sep-2004, 15:16 +0200 (05-Sep 14:16 UK time) Ralph [R] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: R> i'm new to TB and even newer to using it with PGP. If i download PGP R> 8.1 Freeware from PGP.com, will it work with TB? Yes. I use GnuPG myself, but PGP versions 5-8 are supported using TB!'s

Re: default.msl (was: New here, some questions.)

Hello Cristina Ramos, 05-Sep-2004 15:05, you wrote: > What I meant with "translating" was that I don't quite understand how > to use it. You may want to look here (I just asked the same question): http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg77452.html > What should I write in the messages

Re: No Kaspersky AntiVirus Plug-in with The Bat! v3.0?

>I just upgraded to The Bat! v3.0, and I just discovered that this >new version does not include an AntiVirus plugin for Kaspersky >AntiVirus. All previous versions of The Bat! have included this. Actually, it is the Kaspersky AV which includes a plugin for TheBat! and not the other w

TB! & PGP

Hello, i'm new to TB and even newer to using it with PGP. If i download PGP 8.1 Freeware from PGP.com, will it work with TB? Does it make any sense to use 8.1 or is the default PGP in TB good enough? I'm asking, because the PGP-site says, that plugins for outlook (express) and so on will not work

Re: default.msl (was: New here, some questions.)

Hello Thomas, Sunday, September 5, 2004, 1:37:19 PM, you wrote: MCR>>1 - I searched the list archive on smileys and I MCR>> printed the "default.msl" file, but I'm no expert and need some MCR>> help in "translating" the file. TF> You don't need to translate it. TB does it for you. TB us

Re: No more colons (was: Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not)

Hello MAU, On 4 Sep 2004 at 16:52:30 +0200 GMT [16:52 CEST] you wrote: M> Traditionally on the net, asterisks mean *bold*, underscores mean M> _underlined_, slashes mean /italics/, etc. I know. :) And my text is either naked or underlined. -- Cheers, The Bat! 2.12.00 on Andre

Re[2]: New here, some questions.

Hello Roelof, Sunday, September 5, 2004, 1:24:18 PM, you wrote: RO> Generally when an AB template isn't performing like it should, you've RO> got either multiple entries in your AB for the same address or you've RO> got templates assigned to each (or some) entry in that AB group I don

IMAP & new mail sound?

Hi, Yesterday, I did two things more or less at the same time: 1) Changed my e-mail from POP3 to IMAP style; 2) Switched from The Bat! v2 to v3. For this account, I have selected 'Play sound when new mail arrives', I've chosen a wav-file, set the time interval from 07:00 to 22:00, tested it

Re: What is a natural email system?

Hello M i c C u l l e n, 05-Sep-2004 14:10, you wrote: > Isn't it wonderful that you, too, are allowed an opinion. Of course, not > everyone will share it. You are allowed an opinion but we've read it at least 10 times today, yesterday and the day before, and its starting to be a tiny winy bit o

Re: What is a natural email system?

Hello Michael Schneider, 05-Sep-2004 12:04, you wrote: > Come on, show some understanding. Customers are p*ssed off by the way > RITlabs uses to communicate with them at the moment. I'm pissed off too, but what does it change when I moan about the way it is ever since September 1st? Nothing, rig

default.msl (was: New here, some questions.)

Hello Maria, On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 11:24:26 +0100 GMT (05/09/2004, 17:24 +0700 GMT), Maria Cristina Ramos wrote: MCR> I'm new to this list, but not to The Bat. Have been using it since always, I guess. Welcome to the list. MCR>1 - I searched the list archive on smileys and I MCR> printed

Re: Summary of v3?

Hello Allister, On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 18:03:44 +1200 GMT (05/09/2004, 13:03 +0700 GMT), Allister Jenks wrote: AJ> 1) The issues/bugs I not only still get these 100%-CPU-usage freezings, they have become worse, to the extent that I cannot upgrade until this particualr problem is solved. I have had t

Re: Spell check 3.0

Hello P.Johnson, On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 00:00:40 -0500 GMT (05/09/2004, 12:00 +0700 GMT), P.Johnson wrote: TF>> So, have you tried the spellcheck for German or Spanish in the TF>> home version? ;-) PJ> Nein and no. Ach so. PJ> And yes, I see English is the only spellcheck option in the Home PJ> ve

Re: New here, some questions.

Hallo Maria, On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 13:07:27 +0100GMT (5-9-2004, 14:07 +0200, where I live), you wrote: >>> I want to use a specific account whenever I write to this group members >>> (my default account is another one and I didn't want to change the account each t >>> ime I write to a member of this

Re[2]: New here, some questions.

Hello MAU, Sunday, September 5, 2004, 12:56:24 PM, you wrote: M> Hello Maria, >> I want to use a specific account whenever I write to this group members >> (my default account is another one and I didn't want to change the account each t >> ime I write to a member of this group). M> Then, open

Re: What is a natural email system?

On Sunday, September 5, 2004 @ 5:08:48 PM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: [snips] >> Same thing that makes the new release v3 and not v2.1X - marketing and a >> belief that people will believe anything you tell them... Alexander> I'd suggest the two of you start a new list "ranting at ritlabs forever"

Re: New here, some questions.

Hello Maria, > I want to use a specific account whenever I write to this group members > (my default account is another one and I didn't want to change the account each t > ime I write to a member of this group). Then, open the AB. Select the group in question and right click on it and select Pro

Re[2]: New here, some questions.

Hello MAU, Sunday, September 5, 2004, 11:51:28 AM, you wrote: M> Hello Maria, >>2 - Is there a way of assigning an account to use with an Addressbook Group >> or >> individual person? M> Account/properties/General. On the right and near the bottom, Default M> Address book. Is that what

Re: New here, some questions.

Hello Maria, >2 - Is there a way of assigning an account to use with an Addressbook Group or > individual person? Account/properties/General. On the right and near the bottom, Default Address book. Is that what you are looking for? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain

New here, some questions.

Hi there, I'm new to this list, but not to The Bat. Have been using it since always, I guess. I have never had any kind of trouble with any of the versions. I have just upgraded to version 3. May be you can help me with 2 questions: 1 - I searched the list archive on smileys and I printe

  1   2   >