Spam, [S] wrote:
I posted a message earlier about mail filtering on IMAP folders. I
am using The Bat! 3 and it seem as the mail filters only activate if
I click on the Inbox folder. The mail is still received as normally
and I get a new mail icon in the system tray. The problem is the
On 29-9-2004, 7:06, Michael L. Wilson wrote:
MLW I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people
MLW think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like both...so, what do
MLW others think?
Never used K9. I have used SpamPal for quite some time now. After a while,
when the
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:06:27 -0700GMT (29-9-2004, 7:06 +0100, where I
live), Michael L. Wilson wrote:
I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people
think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like both...so, what do
others think?
I am working with Poptray 3.03 and
Hi Allie,
On Tuesday, September 28, 2004 19:44 your local time, which was
Wednesday, September 29, 2004 at 01:44 my local time, Allie Martin [AM]
wrote;
AM There's nothing you can do about this. This is how TB!'s IMAP
AM filtering behaves at the moment.
8 Snipped a bit 8
AM
Hi Michael,
On Tuesday, September 28, 2004 22:06 your local time, which was
Wednesday, September 29, 2004 at 06:06 my local time, Michael Wilson
[MLW] wrote;
MLW I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people
MLW think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like both...so,
Dan, ovo si ti izjavio [28.9.2004, 11:38:32 PM]:
But, as someone said, NFS doesn't quite work. Using this method,
I've made a filter which will mark all read messages (in JUNK folder
with my email as recipient) as unread. But it worked yesteday, and
today it isn't working... :)
BTW, what's
Hello Michael,
I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people
think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like both...so, what do
others think?
Try POPFile (http://popfile.sourceforge.net/), It has been running for
me with 99.82% accuracy for over one year.
--
Best
Hello Michael,
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 7:06:27 AM, you wrote:
MLW Hi,
MLW I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people
MLW think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like both...so, what do
MLW others think?
Been using K9 for a year now. Never used SpamPal.
Hello Sander,
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 8:30:55 AM, you wrote:
SvdB But, to be honest, I would prefer a freeware Windows version of SpamAssassin.
SvdB But it does not exist... :-(
SA is just perl, I had it running nicely OK on a PC a couple of years
back.
Have a google on it...
--
Nick
On 29-9-2004, 10:25, Nick Dutton wrote:
ND Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 8:30:55 AM, you wrote:
SvdB But, to be honest, I would prefer a freeware Windows version of SpamAssassin.
SvdB But it does not exist... :-(
ND
ND SA is just perl, I had it running nicely OK on a PC a couple of years
ND
Hello Code,
Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 11:51:47 PM, you wrote:
Can you guys suggest a better alternative?
http://popfile.sourceforge.net - its not a TB plugin, its a local
proxy. But it rawks! :-) Using it for 3 months now, 98% accuracy...
--
Best regards,
Alexander
Hello Sander,
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 9:43:53 AM, you wrote:
SvdB But, to be honest, I would prefer a freeware Windows version of SpamAssassin.
SvdB But it does not exist... :-(
ND SA is just perl, I had it running nicely OK on a PC a couple of years
ND back.
SvdB I know, I had it
Hello,
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 7:06:27 AM, you wrote:
MLW I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people
MLW think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like both...so, what do
MLW others think?
K9 is more better than SpamPal for me (near 100% accurancy) but you
I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people
think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like both...so, what do
others think?
M Try POPFile (http://popfile.sourceforge.net/), It has been running for
M me with 99.82% accuracy for over one year.
For the record POPFile
Hello Code,
Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 11:51:47 PM, you wrote:
Can you guys suggest a better alternative?
http://popfile.sourceforge.net - its not a TB plugin, its a local
proxy. But it rawks! :-) Using it for 3 months now, 98% accuracy...
But are you checking more than six email
==Original message text===
From: Mica Mijatovic
To: WilWilWil
Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 2:27:36 PM
Subject: All message deleted by filter !
MM -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MM Hash: SHA1
MM***^\ ._)~~
MM ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Tue,
Hæ!
How do I filter such messages?
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 24958 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2004 10:18:15 -
Received: from unknown ([62.67.200.159])
by ..de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with QMQP; 29 Sep 2004 10:18:15
Hallo Thorvald,
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:28:22 +0200GMT (29-9-2004, 12:28 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
Subject:
TN They do not have a subject and a sender.
TN Should I filter on Header does not contain From:?
That's what I should do.
TN What do I have to use for a blank subject?
Header
Hi admin,
Hello Code,
Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 11:51:47 PM, you wrote:
Can you guys suggest a better alternative?
http://popfile.sourceforge.net - its not a TB plugin, its a local
proxy. But it rawks! :-) Using it for 3 months now, 98% accuracy...
aacu But are you checking more than
Just cehcking - if I do a full backup with everything everywhere
ticked, doe the filters (account specific, and global) get backed up
to and thus restored when necessary?
It's just that it doesn't specifically say so in the backup selection
process.
--
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
Hæ!
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 13:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just cehcking - if I do a full backup with everything everywhere
ticked, doe the filters (account specific, and global) get backed up
to and thus restored when necessary?
Yes.
Just did the same today morning... ;)
--
Hæ!
doe the filters (account specific, and global) get backed up
to and thus restored when necessary?
Yes.
Thank you
--
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.annerykiln.co.uk
Using The Bat! 3.0
with POPFile 0.21.1
on Windows XP 5.1
Hæ!
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 12:50, Roelof Otten wrote:
Header matches Subject:\s*\n
Wouldn't \s*\n also catch Here begins the subject\n?
--
Kveðja!
Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
---
The Bug! v3.0.0.19
PopFile v0.22.0
Windows 2000 SP4
Hallo Thorvald,
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:29:22 +0200GMT (29-9-2004, 13:29 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
Header matches Subject:\s*\n
TN Wouldn't \s*\n also catch Here begins the subject\n?
I meant to search in headers (not in subject) for the condition
Subject:\s*\n and that won't be
Hello Roelof,
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 7:41:02 AM, you wrote:
Hallo Thorvald,
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:29:22 +0200GMT (29-9-2004, 13:29 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
Header matches Subject:\s*\n
TN Wouldn't \s*\n also catch Here begins the subject\n?
I meant to search in headers
Hæ!
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 13:41, Roelof Otten wrote:
But when you've got a contact who is so clueless that he uses no
From: header (remember our first condition) and ends his subject
with a colon, then he deserves no better than being caught by your
spamfilter. ;-)
I am glad those
Hæ!
When I copy a filter to an email, I get this:
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [45398AB0.01C4A5F7.60AE2D5B.7DAA52CB]
Name: tbbeta
Filter: {0\0D\0A0`5`2`Reply-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MoveMessage folder \5C\5Caccountname\5CTB!\20Beta\20ML
IsContinue
IsActive
Ignore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 29 Sep 2004,
@ @ at 12:28:22 +0200, when Thorvald Neumann wrote:
Hæ!
How do I filter such messages?
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 29 Sep 2004,
@ @ at 12:12:41 +0200, when WilWilWil wrote:
Great ! You help me ! it's incredible. I can now test easily my
filters with this Mail Dispatcher I didn't know, and
Hæ!
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 14:07, Mica Mijatovic wrote:
Message-ID: R[20-25
--- SNIP ---
Interesting part is MID as well.
Yes, I was also stumbling on this. I will watch this over the next
days. There was only one occurence in the last 130 spam mails...
The latter example could be
Hi,
On Wednesday, September 29, 2004 at 10:43:53 AM, Sander van den Berg wrote:
Onetime, there was a free program called SAproxy, but a while ago it has
gone commercial
I used to use it but it was very very slow. Then I test K9 which was
by far better and then BayesIt. Now, I use BayesFilter
Hello Michael,
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 1:06:27 AM, you wrote:
I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people
think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like both...so, what do
others think?
Most probable that it been taught badly.
It doesn't meter which one
Hallo Thorvald,
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:19:52 +0200GMT (29-9-2004, 14:19 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
TN When I copy a filter to an email, I get this:
TB! Message Filter
TN Is it normal TB! uses the url encoding method?
Yes, though I'd use this filter, but that's a matter of
Hello Richard,
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 4:25:18 AM, you wrote:
RW Gosh you did all that very quickly and efficiently. Very impressive 'cos
RW it took me a couple of days to get PGP sorted out properly.
I had many people helping and still have 4 messages on the
subject parked, including
Hi Thorvald Neumann
-
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, at 13:23:58 [GMT +0200] (which was 4:23 AM where
I live) you wrote:
Just cehcking - if I do a full backup with everything everywhere
ticked, doe the filters (account specific, and global) get backed up
to
Hello Kevin,
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 7:50:43 AM, you wrote:
Just did the same today morning... ;)
Interesting. Doesn't work for me.
Does not work for me either!
--
Thanks,
Terry
Using the Bat! 3.0.0.19
under Windows XP Service Pack 2 2600
Hæ!
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 16:50, Kevin Amazon wrote:
Interesting. Doesn't work for me.
That's strange.
I did a backup today morning, because I had problems with automated
message removal and decided to completely reinstall TB!.
Tools/Backup, chosen all options and saved it to a new
Filter backing up
Does not work for me either!
Thorvald says it does work - he's using Win 2000
Those that say it doesn't are using Win XP.
Connection?
--
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.annerykiln.co.uk
Using The Bat! 3.0
with POPFile 0.21.1
on Windows XP 5.1
Given my problem with dragging header widths makes them disappear
completely to 0 width...
...how can I adjust all folders at once?
The View - Message Headers only operate on the currently displayed
folder.
I guess there's a default for new folders but what when I've got 158
folders and I want
Given my problem with dragging header widths makes them disappear
completely to 0 width...
...how can I adjust all folders at once?
The View - Message Headers only operate on the currently displayed
folder.
I meant View - Message List Columns (not Headers)
I guess there's a default for
I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people
think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like both...so, what do
others think?
IL Most probable that it been taught badly.
IL It doesn't meter which one program do you use, K9, POPFile, ... all of
IL them have exactly
Dear Marten,
@29-Sep-2004, 16:29 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [MG] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
... snip
MG I guess there's a default for new folders but what when I've got 158
MG folders and I want them all the same after they've all become
MG different.
Explore the whole vast range of options
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 29 Sep 2004,
@ @ at 14:28:39 +0200, when Thorvald Neumann wrote:
Interesting part is MID as well.
Yes, I was also stumbling on this. I will watch this over the next
days.
Hello Neal,
Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 5:58:14 PM, you wrote:
NL One way is to look at the statistics BayesIt generates. The would be
NL found here:
Options Preferences Plug-ins BayesIt Information
NL Highlight the BayesIt plugin and click the info button and you will
NL see a large
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 5:42:48 AM, you wrote:
IL 10-20 messages and 90% accuracy of filtering.
IL A few hints, if you have subscribed to any mailing
IL lists, don't mark
IL messages as NOT Junk, put them in white list.
IL White list and black list what you can and let the
IL filter to
Hallo Lynn,
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:55:52 -0700GMT (29-9-2004, 17:55 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
L How would you deal with an account which has very little
L legit traffic, but seems to be a spam magnet?
I'd drop it as soon as possible.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
The Bat! 3.0.0.19
Windows XP
Dear Marten,
Explore the whole vast range of options available to you using View
modes. You can select columns, set widths, threading, sort orders and
apply them on mass to all, selected and tree branches of folders.
Heh hey!! So that's what View Modes is all about! Something new every
day!
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 9:10:36 AM, you wrote:
RO I'd drop it as soon as possible.
Drop what, the account?
I suppose it's worth considering ...
--
Lynn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]* * *Aun Aprendo
I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2
http://www.turriff.net
TBv.3.0.0.14
NT5 SP4
Hello Cristina,
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CR There is still something I'm curious about: when I click on the
CR question mark and the signature is verified, it normally turns into a
CR green check mark. With Mica's messages the question mark disappears
CR and a file
Hallo Lynn,
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:52:34 -0700GMT (29-9-2004, 18:52 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO I'd drop it as soon as possible.
L Drop what, the account?
Yep, anything that gets far more spam than legit mail isn't worth
maintaining.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
The Bat! 3.0.0.19
Windows XP
Hello Mica,
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:04:25 +0200 GMT (29/09/2004, 22:04 +0700 GMT),
Mica Mijatovic wrote:
MM Which reminds me that I have to go for the liver pasta now... It's good
MM with ajvar/AJBAP.
http://faq.macedonia.org/cuisine/ajvar.html
http://www.recipeland.com/recipe/82/
Sounds good.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:06:27 -0700 (1:06 AM here), Michael L. Wilson
[MLW] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MLW I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people
MLW think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like
Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:03:30 +0200 (4:03 AM EDT here) Nikola Knezevic wrote:
is this a bug or a feature. I've set up a filter as
described (in Read messages). It works only when I start it
manually. When I mark all messages in JUNK as read (because filter
sets only some of them as unread), exit
I have loads of email accountsto check.
DO you think I can install POPFile (again) but this time only have it
proxying for some accounts and leave others to not be proxied?
--
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.annerykiln.co.uk
Using The Bat! 3.0
on Windows XP 5.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed 29-Sep-04 6:29am -0400, Thorvald Neumann wrote:
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 12:50, Roelof Otten wrote:
Header matches Subject:\s*\n
Wouldn't \s*\n also catch Here begins the subject\n?
Indeed it would. A better choice might be:
Header field - Subject - match - ^\s*$
Not
Dan, ovo si ti izjavio [29.9.2004, 7:50:03 PM]:
DG Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:03:30 +0200 (4:03 AM EDT here) Nikola Knezevic wrote:
is this a bug or a feature. I've set up a filter as
described (in Read messages). It works only when I start it
manually. When I mark all messages in JUNK as read
Hello,
can i somehow get rid of New and Total in the folder bar? i don't
need those two...
--
Regards,
Ralph
Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Ralph,
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 2:26:14 PM, you wrote:
R a lot of my mails are filtered and moved to (sub-)folders when i
R receive them. However, when i click them in their (sub-)folders, i
R want them to be marked as read after 2 seconds - just like the mails
R in my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO you think I can install POPFile (again) but this time only have it
proxying for some accounts and leave others to not be proxied?
Wouldn't this be accomplished through your TB! mail account settings?
The accounts you want to access through POPFile you would use
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 10:13:11 AM, you wrote:
RO Yep, anything that gets far more spam than legit
RO mail isn't worth
RO maintaining.
No doubt you are right, but I'm having some trouble
training some my correspondents to use the other address
:-(
I'll NAG them! lol!
tnx,
--
Lynn
Hello Stuart Cuddy,
@Mittwoch, 29. September 2004, 21:38 you wrote:
Hello Ralph,
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 2:26:14 PM, you wrote:
R a lot of my mails are filtered and moved to (sub-)folders when i
R receive them. However, when i click them in their (sub-)folders, i
R want them
Hello Ralph,
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 3:28:01 PM, you wrote:
R can i somehow get rid of New and Total in the folder bar? i don't
R need those two...
View- Columns??
you can select the ones you want, and the order they go in.
--
Best regards,
Paul
Hello Paul Cartwright,
@Mittwoch, 29. September 2004, 22:03 you wrote:
Hello Ralph,
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 3:28:01 PM, you wrote:
R can i somehow get rid of New and Total in the folder bar? i don't
R need those two...
View- Columns??
you can select the ones you want, and the
Hello Ralph everyone else
29-Sep-2004 21:53, you wrote:
yes, they are common folers, but i can't find the setting for that
option anywhere...
Select any common folder, then press CTRL-ALT-P to bring up the account
properties for the common folders. This setting applies to all common
Hello Lynn everyone else
29-Sep-2004 21:50, you wrote:
No doubt you are right, but I'm having some trouble
training some my correspondents to use the other address
:-(
They'll learn when they get the no mailbox here by that name responder...
;-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander
Hello Ralph,
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:11:58 +0200GMT Ralph wrote:
R can i somehow get rid of New and Total in the folder bar? i don't
R need those two...
View- Columns??
you can select the ones you want, and the order they go in.
no, that's not what i meant. the left-most
Hi Bat Users,
Here is a little test. Try to find Alow local delivery in the TB!
settings.
Each and every time I need to disable this function for testing purposes
I find myself trying to remember were it was located.
Do you know were it is?
And if you do, do you think it is a logical location?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO you think I can install POPFile (again) but this time only have it
proxying for some accounts and leave others to not be proxied?
Wouldn't this be accomplished through your TB! mail account settings?
The accounts you want to access through POPFile you would use
Hello Alexander,
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:24:53 +0200GMT Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
yes, they are common folers, but i can't find the setting for that
option anywhere...
Select any common folder, then press CTRL-ALT-P to bring up the account
properties for the common folders. This setting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't this be accomplished through your TB! mail account settings?
The accounts you want to access through POPFile you would use 127.0.0.1
as your POP server with the appropriate username settings. The accounts
you don't want to access through POPFile, you would set up
Hello Lynn,
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 11:55:52 AM, you wrote:
How would you deal with an account which has very little
legit traffic, but seems to be a spam magnet?
I have shifted some messages from other accounts and
marked them 'not junk', when I remember, but it's not very
Hello Gerard,
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 4:32:54 PM, you wrote:
G If you are searching for it by now you will find it under Options-Network
G Admin.
G I always look for it under Account-propertiesTransport and
G Mail management.
G Can I get some support for this so I can ask for a
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 2:18:26 PM, you wrote:
IL Go to BayesIt home page and download the database from
IL them. Load it up, and you will see the difference.
It's worth a try ... thanks!
Ummm .. I wrote that before I'd discovered that I can't
find the home page. I went back through
Hello Ralph,
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 8:28:01 PM, you wrote:
R can i somehow get rid of New and Total in the folder bar? i don't
R need those two...
I think you refer to the Unread and Total columns. You can reduce the
size of those 2 columns until they disappear completely.
--
Best
Hallo Gerard,
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:32:54 +0200GMT (29-9-2004, 22:32 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
G Here is a little test.
That's easy, you've got a new address.
G Try to find Alow local delivery in the TB! settings. If you are
G searching for it by now you will find it under
Gerard @ 2004-Sep-29 4:32:54 PM
Try to find Alow local delivery mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is a little test. Try to find Alow local delivery in the TB!
settings.
SNIP
If you are searching for it by now you will find it under Options-Network
Admin.
What does it do? It seems to be related
Michael,
I really like K9 ( POPFile), but to conserve resources on this old system I'm
trying the plug-in Achim Winklers BayesFilter,
http://www.lkcc.org/achim/download/bayesfilter1.5.4.exe. So far it seems to
be almost as good as K9, but learns slower. I did better with the older
versions of
Hallo Steve,
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:40:06 -0700GMT (30-9-2004, 0:40 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
SMK Michael,
SMK I really like K9 ( POPFile), but to conserve resources on this old system I'm
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person
Hallo Steve,
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:40:06 -0700GMT (30-9-2004, 0:40 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
SMK Michael,
snip
SMK
SMK Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
SMK http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Chris,
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 6:14:18 PM, you wrote:
Here is a little test. Try to find Alow local delivery in the TB!
settings.
C SNIP
If you are searching for it by now you will find it under Options-Network
Admin.
C What does it do? It seems to be related to The Bat!
Hi Bat! Fans,
Since upgrading to V3.0 and Windoze XP SP2 (don't know which one is the
problem) I am having weird display problems in the Pick an e-mail address
window.
Where previously arrows appeared to enable the picking or un-picking of an
address, now I get in order (under each other)
4
John Phillips @ 2004-Sep-29 6:15:41 AM
Pick an e-mail address display problem mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this a known fault or only me?
It is a known bug and has been fixed in the latest beta.
--
Chris
Quoting when replying to this message is good for your karma.
Using The Bat! v3.0 on
Paul Cartwright @ 2004-Sep-29 8:03:27 PM
Try to find Alow local delivery mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have multiple accounts, and multiple users on this PC ( me and
wife). I copy her to many emails ( and vice versa) and CC myself to
emails. those go faster when you allow local delivery. that means
Hello, again, everyone.
On Thursday, 23 September 2004, I sent a query
to this list about a problem that I am having in
evaluating The Bat 3.0 as a replacement for
Outlook XP/2002 (under Windows XP Professional,
SP 1).
I believe that my problem stems from the fact
that The Bat does not yet offer
Hæ!
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 20:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO you think I can install POPFile (again) but this time only have it
proxying for some accounts and leave others to not be proxied?
Yes, you define the POP-setting in your account settings and not in
Popfile. Those who should
Hæ!
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 20:22, Bill McCarthy wrote:
Header field - Subject - match - ^\s*$
Thanks, I will try it. :)
Why are RegExp so cryptical... ;)
--
Kveðja!
Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
---
The Bat! v3.0.1 RC1
PopFile v0.22.0
David wrote:
DMD Hello, again, everyone.
DMD On Thursday, 23 September 2004, I sent a query to this list about a
DMD problem that I am having in evaluating The Bat 3.0 as a replacement
DMD for Outlook XP/2002 (under Windows XP Professional, SP 1).
(skipped)
DMD I apologize for mentioning this
Hæ!
Concerning MIDs: Is it safe to assume a valid email does always
contain a MID?
I just saw some SPAM mails do not have a MID.
--
Kveðja!
Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
---
The Bat! v3.0.1 RC1
PopFile v0.22.0
Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195)
88 matches
Mail list logo
