Hi Michael,
Friday, April 19, 2002, 2:50:19 AM, you wrote:
Michael T. Ashby What about with Trend Micro's PC-Cillin or OfficeScan? Does anyone
Michael T. Ashby know if there's anything special needed so that all of TB's mail is
Michael T. Ashby scanned?
Michael T. Ashby Also, what's the story
Hello William,
Friday, April 19, 2002, 3:09:33 AM, you wrote:
DC Be particularly interested to know what he felt
DC about the interface and usability.
William Moore To be honest (and biased) he's over the moon about everything except the
William Moore mail ticker and the default font
I
Hi ,
I was reading over the archives and noticed a earlier discussion on
version d. I just downloaded TB a few days ago and paid the
registration fee today. I have version c, ( still waiting on my
registration code to arrive). Is it possible to get
version d in English? Sorry I do not
Hi Allie,
Friday, April 19, 2002, 3:35:01 AM, you wrote:
Allie C Martin Just a couple tips the veterans already know about... :-)
Thanks for the tips, I will experiment with them and see how it goes.
I don't suppose the color of the ticker background and text is
configurable? I may have
Hi Marck,
Friday, April 19, 2002, 3:49:44 AM, you wrote:
Marck D Pearlstone So did he...
and that even the system font is configurable. I tried a larger font
size then returned to the default.
Marck D Pearlstone He ended up customizing the ticker font, setting it for 30
minute-old
Marck
Hash: MD5
Hi Allie,
Friday, April 19, 2002, 4:16:51 AM, you wrote:
Allie C Martin I should have said in my last message to right click the ticker to see
Allie C Martin the configuration choices. It was just a knee jerk thing to say, 'and
Allie C Martin select properties.' ;-)
Thanks, found
Hi Michael,
Friday, April 19, 2002, 4:22:44 AM, you wrote:
Michael Disabato Folks,
Michael Disabato I've seen the discussions concerning anti-virus plug-ins, and I'm
Michael Disabato wondering what advantage that has over a program that monitors all
Michael Disabato incoming traffic.
Michael
Hi David,
Friday, April 19, 2002, 5:28:11 AM, you wrote:
David Elliott -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
David Elliott Hash: SHA1
David Elliott Hail Marck
David Elliott On 19 April 2002 at 13:53:14 +0100 (which was 13:53 where I live) Marck
D
David Elliott Pearlstone graced us with these
Hello Lars,
Friday, April 19, 2002, 7:32:18 AM, you wrote:
LL Your signature shows you as using the e version, so have you
LL noticed any differences?
Lars Geiger The only difference so far is the incorrect diplaying of the Created
Lars Geiger time. According to TB, your message was created
Hello Miguel,
Friday, April 19, 2002, 7:47:28 AM, you wrote:
Miguel A. Urech There is definitely an advantage in monitoring traffic because not al
Miguel A. Urech virus are spread in attached files. As an example, take a look at:
Miguel A. Urech [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] in this
Hello Nick,
Friday, April 19, 2002, 1:42:05 PM, you wrote:
Nick Andriash Would you mind terribly trimming down the number of characters you use
for
Nick Andriash a quote prefix? By using first and last name... which is only for TB
users
Nick Andriash and only if they have their preferences
Is this virus the one called Klez? In the past two days
someone sent me ( or I received) a couple different
Virus. Once had a attachment file called active.exe.
AVG did not alarm when I downloaded it but I had a good
idea that it was a virus, so when I selected the
file, preparing to save it to
Still
LL doubting I went to Trends Site and am running the
LL House Call online scan.
** Just a update, Trends House Call turned up nothing
also. I scanned my entire hard drive.** But If anyone
has any information / advise on securing The Bat any
better than the the default settings, as
Hello Curt,
Monday, April 22, 2002, 12:14:35 PM, you wrote:
CA What happened to the inbox-known feature I saw in 1.60b? It appears to
CA be gone in 1.60c.
I am using the c version and it still has the InBox
known feature. You have to have the email addresses
already in your address book.
Hi Gerard,
Monday, April 22, 2002, 1:38:55 PM, you wrote:
G Hi Lynna,
G It is possible to send an email with your address in the From field
G with an attachment. I can do that and your machine has nothing to do
G with it.
G Some person using Outlook with your email address in his
Hello ETM,
Monday, April 22, 2002, 1:52:16 PM, you wrote:
E Lynna,
E You might want to consider a different firewall. I understand
E the XP firewall only handles incoming, not outgoing traffic.
I have used two different firewalls in the past,Zone
Alarms, and Sygate. Can I run the built in
Hi Dwight,
Monday, April 22, 2002, 3:34:31 PM, you wrote:
DAC Norton caught a KLEZ which was cleverly accompanied with the following
DAC message:
Klez.E is the most common world-wide spreading worm.It's very
dangerous by corrupting your files. Because of its very smart
stealth and
Hi Andrew,
Tuesday, April 23, 2002, 6:02:39 AM, you wrote:
AH I'm sure that this has been addressed before but I could not find it in
AH the archives and the FAQ doesn't seem to be Netscape friendly. I just
AH downloaded the demo of TB 1.60c but the import wizard does not allow me
AH to
Hi Andrew,
Tuesday, April 23, 2002, 6:32:41 AM, you wrote:
AH Ok but my understanding was that this was a _feature_ of TB. The import
AH wizard does indicate Netscape 6.x as being supported. So, the question
AH remains: is there an official word on this issue? The product is of no
AH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Hello List,
For those of you like myself who have been wondering
how to get the new versions from the german
distribution site (and who dont speak the language).
I just successfully used a machine translation service
to translate www.batmail.de
Hello
Lunsford Hello List,
Lunsford For those of you like myself who have been wondering
Lunsford how to get the new versions from the german
Lunsford distribution site (and who dont speak the language).
Lunsford I just successfully used a machine translation service
Lunsford to translate
Hello Matt,
Friday, April 26, 2002, 8:34:57 AM, you wrote:
Thoene On Friday, April 26, 2002, 12:08:55 AM, Lynna Lunsford wrote:
Installed and working! The Bat! version g.
Thoene Anything new and exciting with the g version?
Version g seems to be working fine for me.
Am not experiencing any
Friday, April 26, 2002, 11:55:07 AM, you wrote:
I do not know the link to the ftp / beta
Lunsford site though I signed up on the beta list and the bug
Lunsford tacking / wish list. Guess I am missing that link...
Lunsford Anyone can point it out I would appreciate it.
Never mind, found it.
Hello John,
Sunday, April 28, 2002, 11:58:54 AM, you wrote:
Sands I have the same problem. The message in this group from Michael
Sands Disabato created at 3:12 PM today is not readable in 1.60h.
I have no problems reading the messages from this same person and I
am now using the h version
Hello reclutamiento,
Monday, April 29, 2002, 8:44:06 AM, you wrote:
reclutamiento I have 1.60h and I do not have any problem whatsoever with my 65.000
reclutamiento emails in several folders and 5 accounts.
reclutamiento To me, it seems people updgrading from betas into 1.60h is the source
Hello Melissa,
Monday, April 29, 2002, 8:49:53 AM, you wrote:
Reese When I moved from 1.60 to 1.60h, I noticed that I could not open any
Reese message that was signed using S/MIME. When I installed 1.60c over
Reese 1.60h, all was back to normal.
Reese Melissa
Is it possible that there is some
Hello Marck,
Monday, April 29, 2002, 10:50:27 AM, you wrote:
Pearlstone Hi Allie,
Pearlstone @29 April 2002, 13:33:07 -0500 (19:33 UK time) Allie C Martin wrote in
Pearlstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ACM Hmmm. I'll give v1.60h a spin then and see how things work out
ACM with
Hello Allie,
Monday, April 29, 2002, 10:33:07 AM, you wrote:
Martin I can view S/MIME signed messages alright. However, none of the sigs
Martin verify as valid. :-/
Funny, when I was using c version the signatures I saw
were showing invalid. But when I installed the h
versions I could still
Hello Allie,
Monday, April 29, 2002, 12:30:49 PM, you wrote:
Martin -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Martin Hash: SHA1
Martin Lynna Lunsford [LL] wrote:
Martin ...
ACM Hmmm. I'll give v1.60h a spin then and see how things work out
ACM with that option enabled.
LL This message showed
Hello Marck,
Monday, April 29, 2002, 10:50:27 AM, you wrote:
I can view S/MIME signed messages alright. However, none of the sigs
verify as valid. :-/
Pearlstone That sometimes needs a bit of juggling to get the CA certificate into
Pearlstone the IE certificate repository.
Actually what I
Hello Allie,
Monday, April 29, 2002, 12:30:49 PM, you wrote:
Martin My messages are PGP signed, not S/MIME signed. The problem we're
Martin discussing is with S/MIME signed messages.
Monday, April 29, 2002, 12:51:14 PM, you wrote:
Lunsford Actually what I am seeing is a THAWTE FREEMAIL
Hello Robert,
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 12:00:29 AM, you wrote:
Beeger It is a stable system and the only extensions I use the whole time is
Beeger Norton Internet Security 2002 Professional and Norton Antivirus 2002.
Beeger This constellation works fine with 1.60c.
Beeger So I don't think it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Hello Haico,
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 12:22:58 AM, you wrote:
Haico yes. ;) *.bav is the plug-in extension which TB needs to
Haico integrate anti-virus software. I believe only
Haico Kaspersky(sp.?) has it.
There is one for AVG ( www.grisoft.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Hello DG,
Sunday, April 28, 2002, 5:48:54 AM, you wrote:
Sr. Why not use UltimateZip found at http://www.ultimatezip.com/
Sr. Supports ALL archive formats and is freeware.
Sr. Hope this helps.
Sr. - --
Sr. Regards,
Sr. DG Raftery Sr.
Thanks for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Marek,
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 7:38:14 AM, you digitally penned the
following:
snip
There is one for AVG ( www.grisoft.com that I downloaded at
http://www.thebat.ipex.cz/stazeni/beta/avgbat2.zip
snip
QS I guess it's gone. I get The requested URL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Marek,
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 7:38:14 AM, you digitally penned the
following:
MM On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Kara Denizi wrote:
There is one for AVG ( www.grisoft.com that I downloaded at
http://www.thebat.ipex.cz/stazeni/beta/avgbat2.zip
QS I guess
Hello Michael,
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 2:46:50 PM, you digitally penned the following:
MD Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 3:32:06 PM, Lynna scribbled:
LL Using The Bat!1.60h
LL on Windows XP
MD Lynna,
MD Ever since you started using 1.60h, your signature has displayed as
MD invalid.
MD Mike
That
Hello Julius,
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 8:36:13 PM, you digitally penned the following:
JS Hi there, List members ,
JS I signed-on and purchased my entry to the bat! about 2 weeks ago.
JS I was expecting a reasonable new alternative to OE.
I purposefully searched for a different email client
Hello Eddie,
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 9:33:34 PM, you digitally penned the following:
EC Dear Lynna,
EC --- Lynna Lunsford / Mittwoch, 01.05.2002, 01:15:03
EC Anti-Virus
MD Ever since you started using 1.60h, your signature has displayed
MD as invalid.
That may be my fault, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Eddie,
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 9:59:49 PM, you digitally penned the
following:
EC Just give me an other answer but with a S/MIME Sig. After your
changes
EC you did not sign anymore so I can't confirm for validity after
your
EC changes
Okay, I had
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Eddie,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 12:05:59 AM, you digitally penned the
following:
EC Sorry Lynna but your Signature is still *not valid*.
EC It say's: No signed attribute and your Serial Number is
075A8B
Okay, I have not a clue as to what the serial
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Marck,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 12:22:41 AM, you digitally penned the
following:
MDP This is your fault not Lynna's. Switch to CryptoAPI (if you're
not
MDP using it) and Import the certificate. You don't have the
certificate
MDP in your list of valid
Hello Marck,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 2:07:55 AM, you digitally penned the following:
on the reply menu while I am writing this I have openPGP checked and
SMIME checked.
MDP Aha - the belt and braces ploy. Use one or the other, not both!
; ) Some of us like to feel really secure! LOL!
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Eddie,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 3:06:46 AM, you digitally penned the
following:
EC This is what just came to my mind when reading the posting from
Micael
EC Disabato. His S/MIME I can see as valid and he use it under
internal
EC Implementation.
EC So,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Michael,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 3:30:41 AM, you digitally penned the
following;
MD Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 6:18:14 AM, Lynna scribbled:
LL Michaels emails are showing a VALID signature to me and I am
LL using the Microsoft CryptoAPI setting in version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Allie,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 4:01:29 AM, you digitally penned the
following;
ACM Allie C Martin [ACM] wrote:
ACM ...
ACM Once setup correctly Lynda's signatures are all valid.
ACM ^^^
ACM That
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Marck,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 3:35:55 PM, you digitally penned the following;
MDP It doesn't. Your message would come through with a tick on the
MDP envelope in the message list and an attachment showing a valid (or an
MDP invalid) signature in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello marco,
Thursday, May 2, 2002, 3:11:47 AM, you digitally penned the following;
m Hello,
m Is there a way to schedule an e-mail for delivery (for instance if you
m want to mail a file that is being processed until a certain moment) ?
Since you brought
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Tim,
Thursday, May 2, 2002, 3:04:40 PM, you digitally penned the following;
T I, too, have been trying S/MIME since reading the recent posts, and
T now have some questions for the list.
T I've been swapping around with 1.60c and 1.60h (and now 1.60i),
Hello Mike,
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 6:31:01 AM, you digitally penned the following;
MS At Saturday, May 4, 2002, 4:15:31 AM, role+the wrote:
Hi,
I think the old bug-reporting changed, but I can't find or remember
where it goes now, so herewith my findings...
Just upgraded to 1.60h,
Hello Roelof,
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 6:36:13 AM, you digitally penned the following;
RO Hello Fré,
RO On Sat, 4 May 2002 15:44:09 +0200GMT (4-5-02, 15:44 +0200GMT, where I
RO live), you wrote:
FvL I just sent myself a test message that I found back in my
FvL Netscape Comm. inbox, instead of
Hello Mark,
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 9:26:22 AM, you digitally penned the following;
MK I am noticing in the HTML messages that I receive not all HTML parts of
MK the message is rendering, such as graphics and other parts of the HTML
MK message. The same message appears to render fine in
Hello Luc,
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 10:58:22 AM, you digitally penned the following;
L Good evening list,
L Has anybody had bad experiences with TB! v1.60i ?
Skipped I and went straight to J.
--
Regards,
Lynnamailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat!1.60j
Hello Luc,
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:06:07 PM, you digitally penned the following;
L But that is still beta, isn't it?
Well, I admit the download link was on the beta site but at one point I
thought that moderators said that these letter series a, b, c, d, e, f, g,
h, i, j were bug - fixes
Hello Melissa,
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:37:39 PM, you digitally penned the following;
MR Done. -- 5/4/2002 1:17 PM
MR Warning: 1 error(s) found in the archive: tb160j.rar
MR Any ideas?
MR Melissa
I downloaded the same file and used the free program Ultimate Zip to open it and its
working
Hello Ben,
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 1:03:21 PM, you digitally penned the following;
MR #
MR Testing archive: tb160j.rar -- 5/4/2002 1:17 PM
MR #
MR Testing file: thebat.exe
MR -- CRC ERROR
BM Both 160i and
Hello Gene,
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 3:19:05 PM, you digitally penned the following;
GG Hi Lynna,
GG I was not concerned about the signature but was wondering how the
GG messages that had the exact same time stamp on them could be different
GG in the valid test.. I now suspect it was just that
Hello Mandara,
Sunday, May 5, 2002, 3:25:37 AM, you digitally penned the following:
M Again, don't turn PGP off, since there is no reason for it; this
M system is readable for all. But if you are using MS CryptoAPI then you
M should count on that that some of us cannot read those messages.
It
Hello Jonathan,
Sunday, May 5, 2002, 4:45:23 PM, you digitally penned the following;
JA I think what it means is you type the first letter, and it matches the
JA first folder that it reaches... when you type the second letter, it tries
JA to find the next folder that begins with letter 1... AND
Hello Mandara,
Sunday, May 5, 2002, 1:30:56 PM, you digitally penned the following;
M Hash: SHA1
M On Sat, 4 May 2002, at 08:53:00 -0500 Michael wrote:
MD I can confirm this. I've tried reading a message originated from
MD Outlook and TheBat! 1.60c. The implementations are mutually
MD
Hello Mandara,
Sunday, May 5, 2002, 6:17:32 PM, you digitally penned the following;
M Dear Lynna, it seems very near, so just do the next, please: you have
M only to place your cursor in the folder pane and to press a T key on
M the keyboard. Then, *hold* your finger on this key *all the time*
61 matches
Mail list logo
