Re: Opera 7, TheBat!, FAQ, DOM

2002-11-19 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello TBUDL, Tue, 19 Nov 2002 at 19:30:33[GMT +0100](18:30 where I live) you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : not if you don't untick Enable javascript it doesn't, or at least it doesn't with me :-( OK, rarely, but happened: You lost me completely in this sentence. A

Beta download site

2002-11-24 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello, I've lost the site for downloading the Beta version and would like to get with it and go from 6 to 7 so could someone point me to the right URL please? -- Best regards, Richard A wok is what you throw at a wabbit The Bat! 1.62/Beta6 with Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0

Re: Beta download site

2002-11-25 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Michael, Mon, 25 Nov 2002 at 03:33:31[GMT -0500](08:33 where I live) you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Here it is. http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/ I thank you :-) -- Best regards, Richard Life can be great if you live it to the fullest! The Bat! 1.62/Beta6 with

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-28 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Jonathan, Thu, 28 Nov 2002 at 23:18:10[GMT -0600](05:18 where I live) you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Start changing things, or flexing the rules slightly, and you end up having all kinds of problems. Unless you're Microsnort in which case you can design a

Adding attachment to mass mail

2002-11-30 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello, This is very strange. I send out a PDF file to a list of about 60 people once a month using a quick template. I select the group in the address book and then File/Mass mailing using template. I then edit the quick template and add the necessary file for sending and save the resulting

Re: (no subject)

2002-11-30 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Daniel, Sat, 30 Nov 2002 at 20:06:16[GMT +1100](09:06 where I live) you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Oh dear, how very very embarrassing... - I was playing with the mass mailing template thingo mentioned in that last TBUDL message, and... um... i think i

Re: Adding attachment to mass mail

2002-11-30 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Dierk, Sat, 30 Nov 2002 at 11:28:24[GMT +0100](10:28 where I live) you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Put it at the beginning of your template/message with the addition of %- at the end of the line. Strange but that doesn't work at all and, even if I put the cursor

Re: Adding attachment to mass mail

2002-11-30 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Dierk, Sat, 30 Nov 2002 at 18:20:27[GMT +0100](17:20 where I live) you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : As today I ran into the same problem - an automated reply didn't have the attachments - I now another idea. Did you by any chance change your directory hierarchy

Re: Adding attachment to mass mail

2002-11-30 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Dierk, Sat, 30 Nov 2002 at 18:47:46[GMT +0100](17:47 where I live) you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Easy to find out: Download the current version (beta 16) and try again. But that's why I asked, we're both using it already :-( -- Best regards, Richard A truly

Re: Adding attachment to mass mail

2002-11-30 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Dierk, Sat, 30 Nov 2002 at 19:21:02[GMT +0100](18:21 where I live) you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Sorry, your signature and X-Mailer header show beta 7. Well I'm damned so it does and I've just checked and I'm running beta 7 although that's even stranger because

Re: Adding attachment to mass mail

2002-11-30 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Dierk, Sat, 30 Nov 2002 at 19:57:36[GMT +0100](18:57 where I live) you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : In this specific case, the %ATTACHFILE macro lines (each file uses one) showed E:\path instead of D:\path. After I corrected that everything worked fine. Not in my

Moving to previous message

2002-12-01 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello, I use view messages by reference and have mark message as read after 3 seconds. Sometimes I read a message and find I want to go back to it but can't find a keystroke to move back through recent messages that I have looked at. It's not the same as CTRL [ because that only moves to the

Re: Moving to previous message

2002-12-01 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Peter, Sun, 1 Dec 2002 at 10:08:59[GMT +0100](09:08 where I live) you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Try alt + left arrow to go to the previously viewed message. Now that one *definitely* isn't in the published list of keystrokes. Many thanks. -- Best regards,

Re: Moving to previous message

2002-12-01 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Thomas, Sun, 1 Dec 2002 at 16:43:44[GMT +0700](09:43 where I live) you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : If you want to go back to the message you read after that one (the one you came from before you hit alt + left arrow) use alt + right arrow. ;-) Ah, my super

Big problems

2002-12-01 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello, First of all I find I can't get an attachment to go with my mass mailing to an address group. Now TB! is using just over 70% of my processor when at idle and the cursor is continually flashing between that and the hourglass. The programme all works OK but I can't understand what has

Re: Big problems

2002-12-01 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Miguel, Sun, 1 Dec 2002 at 22:15:08[GMT +0100](21:15 where I live) you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Since you are using a beta version I think you should report these problems in the TBBETA list. Oops! -- Best regards, Richard Jury: Twelve people who determine

Re: Big problems

2002-12-01 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello syv, Sun, 1 Dec 2002 at 13:24:01[GMT -0800](21:24 where I live) you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : I use mass-mailing without any problem. Here is what I use in the template at the end of the message: Yup, that's the way I do it too but, this time, there is no way I

Re: HTML mail

2002-12-02 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Mean, On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 at 11:11:56[GMT +0530](which was 05:41 where I live) you wrote: MD http://ccug.apcug.org the newsletter section has all my reviews. MD Planning to write one on the Bat! I am a recent user still getting my MD feet wet...that's why the elementary question. Do you

Re: (no subject)

2002-12-08 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Michael, http://www.foresight.net.au/dg/stuff/mefitag.html http://www.geocities.com/Colosseum/3505/tags.htm http://winn.com/bs/taglines.html http://www.df.lth.se/~lft/tags/cookies.text ..and many more. Look for taglines -- Best regards, Richard Small minds discuss people,

Re: About TB ON XP *freezing*

2002-12-08 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Victor, On Sun, 8 Dec 2002 at 15:33:30[GMT -0500](which was 20:33 where I live) you wrote: VBG I am trying to run TB 24/7 on a 1.6 GHz, P4, 512 DDR RAM, VBG Cable connection (d 1.6MEG - u 800kb) with Roxios GoBack 3 VBG Deluxe and Zone Alarm Professional running. I am also running ZA

Re: About TB ON XP *freezing*

2002-12-08 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Allie, On Sun, 8 Dec 2002 at 16:34:10[GMT -0500](which was 21:34 where I live) you wrote: ACM This happens all the time when TB! is running or does it happen as ACM soon as it starts checking for mail? Unfortunately all the time. TB! behaves for the first 5 seconds after starting and then

Re: About TB ON XP *freezing*

2002-12-08 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Allie, On Sun, 8 Dec 2002 at 16:50:04[GMT -0500](which was 21:50 where I live) you wrote: ACM Interestingly this was my experience before things went awry. Good ACM luck. Un installed, rebooted and no change. shucks :-( -- Best regards, Richard The early bird suffers from insomnia

Re: ?: LOST Folders !!!

2002-12-08 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Alexander, On Mon, 9 Dec 2002 at 11:02:06[GMT +0500](which was 06:02 where I live) you wrote: AAG I'm in troubles now ! I've lost all folders of The Bat (but AAG directories and bases are OK) I had to uninstall TB! a week or so ago but I had backups of all the important folders. When I re

Re: Message flags

2002-12-11 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Marck, On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 at 01:16:37[GMT +](which was 01:16 where I live) you wrote: MDP This one is signed with S/MIME MDP just to ring the changes. Now that's weird because I don't get a tick on your envelope icon :-( -- Best regards, Richard Your friends will know you better

Re: %ATTACHFILE Not Working

2002-12-11 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Thomas, On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 at 00:47:49[GMT +0700](which was 17:47 where I live) you wrote: TF I am not quite sure, but the line break might be the culprit. to check TF that out, copy the file the C:\tmp and try to attach it from there. TF Let us know whether it suddenly works. I asked

Re: About TB ON XP *freezing*

2002-12-11 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Gerard, On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 at 14:14:32[GMT +0100](which was 13:14 where I live) you wrote: G What you can do is start the taskmanager and then start the application G (The Bat!) that is experiencing the freeze. You should still see the G offending program jump to the top of the list if

Re: Message flags

2002-12-11 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Richard, On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 at 23:09:47[GMT +](which was 23:09 where I live) you wrote: RW Now that's weird because I don't get a tick on your envelope icon :-( But maybe it's because I don't have the standard Bat glyphs, I have a downloaded set. -- Best regards, Richard Life can

Re: About TB ON XP *freezing*

2002-12-12 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Gerard, On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 at 13:45:36[GMT +0100](which was 12:45 where I live) you wrote: G I have the same setup and I checked but I have only one instance at G 17+K. G If you have had this problem from the beginning may I suggest that G you download the latest version again, Well, I

Re: About TB ON XP *freezing*

2002-12-12 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Gerard, On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 at 20:16:17[GMT +0100](which was 19:16 where I live) you wrote: G My problems started after about 9 months of problem free operation. I do G remember ZoneLabs telling me there was a new update. I had a look but G didn't change anything. My ZoneLabs did it on its

Re: About TB ON XP *freezing*

2002-12-12 Thread Richard Wakeford
Now why did that double post happen? I did my usual of clicking on the send button in the message for an immediate send. -- Best regards, Richard Blessed are they who have little to say -- and don't. Using The Bat! version 1.62 Beta/17 with Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack

Re: About TB ON XP *freezing*

2002-12-12 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Gerard, On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 at 21:30:21[GMT +0100](which was 20:30 where I live) you wrote: G No double send here, maybe a double receive? Try kill dupes Hm?? Strange but I did kill the dupes. Just thought that it was sent twice too. -- Best regards, Richard

Re: SOT: Its official ZAP is out, Kerio now in

2002-12-13 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Victor, On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 at 03:12:47[GMT -0500](which was 08:12 where I live) you wrote: VBG I really love how it plays firewall with my applications, VBG asking permission if one app can use or install another. ZAPro does that too. -- Best regards, Using The Bat! version 1.62

Re: S/MIME on ML's (was: It's true - *Freezing* Is caused byZoneAlarm)

2002-12-14 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Simon, On Sun, 15 Dec 2002 at 01:49:05[GMT +](which was 01:49 where I live) you wrote: SB I bow out of this thread. Sorry, Thomas, but if you want to email me offlist SB with your personal remarks then that's fine. I'll defend myself in private. After Thomas's excellent mail I

Mailwasher

2002-12-21 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello, After favourable reports I'm giving Mailwasher programme a try but one thing I can't find any information about. I keep my mail on the server for 5 days just in case and Mailwasher gets all messages each time it logs on, not exactly an efficient way to work! Is there a way to make it

Re: Mailwasher

2002-12-22 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Clive, On Sun, 22 Dec 2002 at 08:13:16[GMT +](which was 08:13 where I live) you wrote: It's working as designed. Mailwasher is looking at messages on the server and if you're keeping them there, then it will download the headers! Oh. Thanks. -- Best regards, Richard Using The

Re: Email Download Aborted - Solved!

2002-12-31 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Lawrence, On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 at 08:59:58[GMT -0600](which was 14:59 where I live) you wrote: The aborted email download has been traced to enabling MailSafe in ZoneAlarm. It is supposed to protect your computer from incoming e-mail attachments that contain malicious code or viruses.

Re: Email Download Aborted - Solved!

2003-01-01 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Anne, On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 at 19:00:07[GMT +](which was 19:00 where I live) you wrote: it's my view that the problem arises mainly because of an incompatibility between ZoneAlarm and Win XP. Those of us using older versions of Windows appear to have less or no problems with ZA or ZA

Re: Email Download Aborted - Solved!

2003-01-01 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Lawrence, On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 at 15:05:17[GMT -0600](which was 21:05 where I live) you wrote: You are welcome to subscribe to the list yourself and see if you can download the digest with Mailsafe enabled. I just have done and it will be interesting to see if the same problems occur

Re: Email Download Aborted - Solved!

2003-01-01 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Lawrence, On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 at 15:05:17[GMT -0600](which was 21:05 where I live) you wrote: You are welcome to subscribe to the list yourself and see if you can download the digest with Mailsafe enabled. Well, I joined the list just before going to bed and woke to find that TB! had

Re: Dictionary question

2003-01-02 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Daniel, On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 at 12:12:55[GMT -0400](which was 16:12 where I live) you wrote: I don't think it's a bug. It is working for me when selecting the French dictionary. When you look in Spell Checker - Dictionaries, it only shows the American English and User dictionaries. I

Re: Email Download Aborted - Solved!

2003-01-02 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Lawrence, On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 at 06:43:01[GMT -0600](which was 12:43 where I live) you wrote: Now that the holidays are officially over, I'll follow up with ZoneLabs and see if they received my bug report. I'd be interested to hear what they have to say. In the meantime I'll continue

Re: how to ged rid of attachments from message base ?

2003-01-02 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Markus, On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 at 14:18:22[GMT +0100](which was 13:18 where I live) you wrote: There is also another quick way to filter what you see. Click on any item (read/unread, attachment, parked, flagged, name, subject, date) in the summary view while keeping the Alt key depressed

Re: Email Download Aborted - Solved!

2003-01-02 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Gerard, On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 at 16:16:50[GMT +0100](which was 15:16 where I live) you wrote: Un-installing ZA USED to be a hassle. No just go to add/remove programs and ZA will disappear, after which you can install Kerio. Are you sure? I remember not that long ago being pointed to a well

Re: Email Download Aborted - Solved!

2003-01-02 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Tom, On Fri, 3 Jan 2003 at 06:45:25[GMT +1100](which was 19:45 where I live) you wrote: Here's a link at the Outpost site that probably will assist. I also used to use ZA pro, had all sorts of weird problems, but since moving to Outpost Pro haven't looked back. Yup. that's the

Re: Email Download Aborted - Solved!

2003-01-02 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Allie, On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 at 15:49:19[GMT -0500](which was 20:49 where I live) you wrote: It would seem from what I read that if you reboot with it disabled so that the true vector engine isn't started then you can uninstall it without hassle. Still lots of work needed with regedit to

Re: Indent a section of text?

2003-01-09 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Gavin, On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 at 19:43:49[GMT +1100](which was 08:43 where I live) you wrote: Is it possible to indent an existing section of text in TB! editor? It's pretty much a rhetorical question, so I can again point out the necessity of a powerful email program allowing you to edit

Re: Indent a section of text?

2003-01-09 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Gavin, On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 at 20:06:27[GMT +1100](which was 09:06 where I live) you wrote: Like the reply template, BTW (with the two times). Can you email it to me? With pleasure. Here's the whole thing including cookies etc. Change to suit :-)

Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Jonathan, On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 at 09:32:25[GMT -0600](which was 15:32 where I live) you wrote: Yes you can... it's just unusual how you do it. If you double click on an email in a folder, it appears you have just opened an email... Well that is almost correct. Now click on View - Message

Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Marck, On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 at 16:44:55[GMT +](which was 16:44 where I live) you wrote: I have Use the account default column settings enabled for all my folders (well, most of them) and have no problem seeing them in that consistent format. Hm, not here, well not everything. Some

Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Marck, On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 at 23:13:17[GMT +](which was 23:13 where I live) you wrote: The pop-up folder view is different from the Main window folder view and stores and separate configuration. Just set the columns once and they will be remembered for the pop-up folder too. Well

Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Greg, On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 at 18:04:57[GMT -0600](which was 00:04 where I live) you wrote: Can you change the default column settings? If yes, how? Yes I can. I right clicked on the toolbar and selected the columns I wanted. I think I've found out what I was doing wrong. I didn't shut

Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Marck, On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 at 00:26:21[GMT +](which was 00:26 where I live) you wrote: Just change any folder that is configured to be one of those using the settings. All other folder similarly set will be affected by the changes. But only when you close the folder in which you

Re: TBUDL - this very list

2003-01-18 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Miguel, On Sat, 18 Jan 2003 at 12:50:32[GMT +0100](which was 11:50 where I live) you wrote: What is a Catch-22? I'm asking seriously, because I don't know what it means. Catch 22 is an absurd situation from which one can never win. Being constantly balked by a clause, rule etc which

Re: TBUDL - this very list

2003-01-18 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Miguel, On Sat, 18 Jan 2003 at 14:01:48[GMT +0100](which was 13:01 where I live) you wrote: You mean Catch-22 means marriage? ;-) Nice one :-) However I've been divorced and single for 15 years now so I got out of it (not telling why though!) -- Best regards, Richard | Using The Bat!

Moving to original message

2003-01-21 Thread Richard Wakeford
I've searched high and low through the key strokes list and can't find out how to move to the original message that I am reading the answer to. I can see how to move to the previous unread but that's not the same. Even though mail is well quoted I find it still helps me to sometimes read the whole

Re: Moving to original message

2003-01-22 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Anthony, On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 at 18:51:49[GMT -0800](which was 02:51 where I live) you wrote: Ctrl + Backspace Not here it doesn't unfortunately. All I get is the following dialogue box This message is addressed to you but not marked as replied. ;-( -- Best regards, Richard | Using The

Re: Moving to original message

2003-01-22 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Mary, On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 at 19:51:01[GMT -0600](which was 01:51 where I live) you wrote: I like to have the original in front of me, too. I have my Windows arranged in a tiled fashion--I did it through manually sizing them, rather than selecting Tiles--such that a message I am Replying

Re: Moving to original message

2003-01-22 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Thomas, On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 at 11:14:47[GMT +0700](which was 04:14 where I live) you wrote: You could always put it again into the wishlist. I also have to scroll up the line in thread view often in order to find the message the poster had replied to. I would prefer a single keystroke

Re: Moving to original message

2003-01-25 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Miguel, On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 at 10:17:24[GMT +0100](which was 09:17 where I live) you wrote: Are you using View/View threads by/Reference? That helps a bit. Certainly am :-) I also usually have them sorted by creation time too. The trouble is I sometimes can't even find the original

Re: Moving to original message

2003-01-25 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Mary, On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 at 07:11:40[GMT -0600](which was 13:11 where I live) you wrote: I went to the TBUDL folder and tried it. Of course, I had to scroll for the root, as Thomas terms it, the originating message of the thread. Ah, but that's not the one I want either :-) I want to

Re: Moving to original message

2003-01-25 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Mary, On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 at 12:31:03[GMT -0600](which was 18:31 where I live) you wrote: It was my first post to the wish-list. I got a form letter back, but at least I know the request is in their files now. Have you posted yours yet? I saw your post to Miguel that you were going

Re: Moving to original message

2003-01-25 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Mary, On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 at 16:24:19[GMT -0600](which was 22:24 where I live) you wrote: I am afraid this exchange will soon be considered OT. Want to say any more on TBOT? I don't think so. Just wait and hope that wishes are implemented by the powers that be :-) -- Best regards,

Re: Moving to original message

2003-01-25 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Roelof, On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 at 00:20:44[GMT +0100](which was 23:20 where I live) you wrote: When you view threads by references, the message that was replied to is _always_ one level up. Now this is getting interesting because it certainly doesn't happen here. In fact, on inspecting

Re: Moving to original message

2003-01-26 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Anthony, On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 at 18:51:49[GMT -0800](which was 02:51 where I live) you wrote: I've searched high and low through the key strokes list and can't find out how to move to the original message that I am reading the answer to. Ctrl + Backspace Just found out that, if I turn

Re: Moving to original message

2003-01-26 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Roelof, On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 at 08:42:44[GMT +0100](which was 07:42 where I live) you wrote: Yes. you're probably sorting in descending order, but that wouldn't really matter. I am sorting that way and I agree, it shouldn't matter but it does seem to. If I turn it off the threading

Re: Moving to original message

2003-01-26 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Thorsten, You forgot to add your own words of wisdom which I was looking forward to reading ;-( -- Best regards, Richard | Using The Bat! version 1.63 Beta/5 | Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3 | and using the best browser: Opera. Only a mediocre person is always at

Re: Moving to original message

2003-01-26 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Peter, On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 at 16:18:22[GMT +0100](which was 15:18 where I live) you wrote: Select (1), than select two and read it. Now use Alt+Left to move to the previous selected message and Alt+Right to move to the next selected message. This way you can toggle between (1) and the

Re: Moving to original message

2003-01-26 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Miguel, On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 at 16:54:09[GMT +0100](which was 15:54 where I live) you wrote: Alt+Left_Arrow (or right click and select Move to previously viewed). But that only takes you back the messages you have read in that particular session. It doesn't take you to the number (1)

Re: Moving to original message

2003-01-26 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Miguel, On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 at 14:22:26[GMT +0100](which was 13:22 where I live) you wrote: I am sure you have seen in this and other TB lists MID links like: [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] If you double click on it it will jump and take you to the root message of this

Re: Looks like html makes to the BAT

2003-02-07 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Kenneth, On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 at 11:54:54[GMT -0500](which was 16:54 where I live) you wrote: One thing I like it is it's not obtrusive, and I can turn it on or off at will. I know people like it but I wish there was an option to strip all HTML mail instead of having to delete it manually.

Re: Looks like html makes to the BAT

2003-02-08 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Douglas, On Sat, 08 Feb 2003 at 00:13:25[GMT -0600](which was 06:13 where I live) you wrote: That is not true. Here's how I do it (it's very simple): 1).- The Mail Dispatcher will pull down as many lines as you set it for (I download 25). 2).- Selective Download will look for the

Re: Looks like html makes to the BAT

2003-02-08 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Douglas, On Sat, 08 Feb 2003 at 05:23:49[GMT -0600](which was 11:23 where I live) you wrote: Not exactly. What happens is: All messages containing the string html in the first 25 lines will be de-selected for downloading by the Mail Dispatcher. That is, if you want, you can let them be

HTML sectarianism :-)

2003-02-08 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello all, Gosh, this HTML thing really is dividing up what was a happy mailing list. It's worse than Catholics against Protestants (or any other religious factions squabbling). I personally hate HTML but PC novices (and a lot of regular users) don't seem understand the difference between that

Re: HTML sectarianism :-)

2003-02-08 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Csaba, On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 at 18:59:56[GMT +0100](which was 17:59 where I live) you wrote: I think you just further detriorate the situation by calling those who like HTML mail PC novices. Was it really necessary? Does it make you feel that you belong to the experts now? I personally

Re: HTML sectarianism :-)

2003-02-09 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Deborah, On Sun, 9 Feb 2003 at 19:44:59[GMT +](which was 19:44 where I live) you wrote: No it isn't. It's no fun, but believe me, it's not as bad as that. I know, I've worked in Belfast. In fact the last time I was there they bombed the Europa hotel (as it was then) the day after we

Re: Missing Spell Checker Option

2003-02-12 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Ed, On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 at 11:18:30[GMT -0700](which was 18:18 where I live) you wrote: Very odd, there is no Spell Checker menu option. I have 7 menu options: Msg, Edit, Search, Utilities, Privacy, View, Options. That's 'cos the spoil chicken is in the message editor and not the

Re: Missing Spell Checker Option

2003-02-12 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Ed, On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 at 11:43:21[GMT -0700](which was 18:43 where I live) you wrote: RW Messag, Edit, Search, Utilities, Spell Checker, Privacy, View, Options Nope, as in original post stated it's missing for new msg, or at least that's what I meant by composing. FWIW, it's also

Re: Known filter question

2003-02-14 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Allie, On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 at 06:19:52[GMT -0500](which was 11:19 where I live) you wrote: To get things working the way you wish, I suggest using the INBOX as your Inbox-Known folder, deactivate the Inbox-Known filter, and creating a new incoming filter with the following:

Re: Known filter question

2003-02-14 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Allie, On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 at 19:15:22[GMT -0500](which was 00:15 where I live) you wrote: As a part of spam filtering. Ah, Spampal works a treat for me thanks. I wonder about the usefulness of the filter myself. I guess it's a means of making such a filtering method more

Reply reminder

2003-02-16 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello, Occasionally I need to reply to a message but can't do it at that particular moment so would like to be able to mark it in an obvious way so that I don't miss it later. I have mark message read as soon as it is opened set. I would like to be able to easily (ie with one or two keystrokes)

Re: Reply reminder

2003-02-16 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Allie, On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 at 07:16:35[GMT -0500](which was 12:16 where I live) you wrote: You could use the message flagging for this. You could drag and drop the message to a folder that is designated for messages to be replied to. The trouble with that is that it is already

Re: Reply reminder

2003-02-16 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Miguel, On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 at 13:26:07[GMT +0100](which was 12:26 where I live) you wrote: Use a Colour Group or just copy the message to a Pending_Reply folder. Do I actually have to select the colour group with the dialoge box or can I assign a key stroke to it somehow? In regards

Re: Reply reminder

2003-02-16 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Deborah, On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 at 12:27:38[GMT +](which was 12:27 where I live) you wrote: You could create a keyboard shortcut to perform whatever function you choose - eg marking it with a specific colour. You'll find it at View-Edit Shortcuts, or by pressing Alt-F12. Gosh it's

Re: Reply reminder

2003-02-16 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Allie, On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 at 07:47:26[GMT -0500](which was 12:47 where I live) you wrote: You could create replied filters for this folder. It's not as difficult as it would seem. Just copy the Inbox filters to the replied filter group and change the source folder name to that

Re: Reply reminder

2003-02-16 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Miguel, On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 at 16:03:01[GMT +0100](which was 15:03 where I live) you wrote: You can assign a keystroke. If you care to see what I do to not forget any replies, you can look for [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] dated 25 oct 2002 and with Subject: Re: Displaying

Re: Auto Reply With attachement

2003-02-25 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Mark, On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 at 01:11:30[GMT +0100](which was 00:11 where I live) you wrote: Thanks Marck, that 's nearly what I tried but did not work. I had %ATTACHFILE = filename.pdf. Removing the spaces did the trick. I must say however that I had copied/pasted ATTACHFILE = filepath

Re: Stuart and his long signatures

2003-03-05 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Allie, On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 at 05:21:53[GMT -0500](which was 10:21 where I live) you wrote: For those interested, with Stuart's consent, I created a filter that will catch the messages he sends to me intended for the list. He includes a comment header that not only indicates this

Re: Colors in Quotes

2003-03-07 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello David, On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 at 14:22:19[GMT -0500](which was 19:22 where I live) you wrote: I'm not sure how familiar any of you are with OE-Quotefix... But it would be so nice for TB! to be able to do to quotes what OE-Quotefix does.. Different colors depending on the level of

Re: Wishlist request.

2003-03-10 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Spike, On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 at 13:12:24[GMT -0500](which was 18:12 where I live) you wrote: As I am one of the group members (the 'owner'), I get each message back into the folder for the group. I still haven't figured out how the filter misfired after 14 months, as the trigger is the

Re: %OSubj macro behaviour

2003-06-24 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Kevin, On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 you wrote: Which method is preferred (ie: politically correct) when replying to a thread, keeping the Re: or stripping it? Personally I prefer keeping RE: because it makes it easier to delete additions to threads that I have previously deleted because I have

Re: Tooltips

2003-07-08 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Thomas, On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 you wrote: TF No, I mean the short description what an icon does when you hover over TF it with the mouse (without clicking). But thanks anyway. Just The Bat! that hasn't any tooltips? Or other programs too? Just TB. Other programs show the tooltips OK. Well

Re: Tooltips

2003-07-09 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello MAU, On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 you wrote: I think the option was not to turn tooltips off but to change the style, to either show them as normal tooltips or to show them with big and bold yellow characters IIRC. Original post asked the following : How do you make tooltips appear or not? --

Re: Tooltips

2003-07-10 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Miguel, On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 you wrote: You are right, but I did not reply to your original post. I replied to Thomas Fernandez who said: Aargh, that's what comes of being away for two days, rushing through the responses too quickly and not getting the threading right in my head. Sorry

Re: I've Asked Several Times

2003-07-21 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Auke, On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I've asked several times to be removed/unsubscribed from the mailing list, but I keep receiving mail anyway. They'll all be deleted unread from the server, and this autoresponse will be sent until my name is removed. It's

Re: I've Asked Several Times

2003-07-21 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Matt, On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] How many times it this person going to send this! I've counted at least 6 - 8 times now. He has it set to auto-reply to the TBUDL list so every message we send, he replies. A HORRIBLE way to solve a problem that he could so

Re: I've Asked Several Times

2003-07-21 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Terry, On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't think your message will be read!! ;-) Correct so I've already set him up in a kill filter ;-) -- Best regards, Richard | Using The Bat! 1.63 Beta/11 SpamPal | Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 4

Re: help selecting multiple recipients

2003-07-24 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Steve, On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] AM Uhh. Sorry to hear that. I think you'd make a valuable member of TBBETA. AM Have you thought of joining to give your input? I'd love to join, but have no idea how. I've also heard mention of a wish list, but don't know

Re: Losing blank lines (%- macro?)

2003-08-14 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Roelof, On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For example: ,- [ ] | Hallo %- | %ToFname%- | ,%- `- gives this in a message to you: ,- [ ] | Hallo John, `- Gosh, that and the rest is the most I've learnt about Macros so far, thanks. I normally

Re: always get recipient's full name from my addrbook?

2003-08-14 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Bill, On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hmm, what if the address wasn't in your book? How about: Hello %ABoFromName=%oFromName i searched over the help file and macro list, couldn't find any references for these %AB* macros. any idea where i can find a

Re: Multiple Addresbook entries when added automatically

2003-08-23 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Dan, On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You can enter all addressees of your outgoing mail into your address book by creating an Outgoing Mail filter. Rule:Name: Add recipients to AB String: @ | Location: Recipient | Presence: Yes

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >