. Or
change your filter that adds those addresses so that it checks whether
the address exists in your AB before adding it.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Be nice to your kids. They'll choose your nursing home.
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat! 4.0.24.23
Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6001 Service Pack 1
3
Hello Tom,
Thursday, June 26, 2008, 3:22:54 AM, you wrote:
T Sorry, you are right, my quoting these addresses was incorrect. The address
T appears as follows:
T _Paul XYZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T Paul-XYZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T I think there was a third version but I cannot find it quickly. The
T
Hello Everyone,
I raised this issue before and while I understand the cause now, I
have not yet fully solved the problem.
Here is my problem:
One of my contact is using the same email address @xyztrading.com with
different prefixes (not sure why). So while most of his emails come in
as [EMAIL
Hello Tom,
Thursday, June 26, 2008, 7:03:25 AM, you wrote:
So, I either need to amend the salutation manually or go into the
addressbook to remove the duplicate entry for Paul (it's duplicate as
the email address is always the same, just the way it appears changes
with the various prefixes).
above 'Delete
from server'
My server does my spam marking, it adds a spam header and I've set TB
to move those messages to a spam folder and mark them as read (you
know that you can set multiple actions to a single filter, don't you)
so I won't see it unless I'm browsing my spam folder to check
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 07:15:36 +0200, Roelof Otten
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo Chris,
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:00:08 +1000GMT (9-6-2008, 19:00 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
C Today I received an email from Neco [EMAIL PROTECTED]. The
C filter was triggered (the account log says that the email
as read (you
know that you can set multiple actions to a single filter, don't you)
so I won't see it unless I'm browsing my spam folder to check for
false spam marks. So that could be an option for you too.
C Ah nuts :( I'm not sure what the problem with it is - I set it to be
C the two dashes
Hi,
I have a filter thus:
Name: Spam (Known)
Condition: Sender Contains @neco.com.au
Action: Delete the Message from the Server
Today I received an email from Neco [EMAIL PROTECTED]. The
filter was triggered (the account log says that the email was
processed by Spam (Known). Problem
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:00:08 +1000, Grumpy Gamer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today I received an email from Neco [EMAIL PROTECTED]. The
Oops, list has munged the email. Let's try expanding it out a little:
Neco less than sign newsletter at @ neco dot com dot au greater than
sign
--
Regards,
GG
Hallo Chris,
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:00:08 +1000GMT (9-6-2008, 19:00 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
C Today I received an email from Neco [EMAIL PROTECTED]. The
C filter was triggered (the account log says that the email was
C processed by Spam (Known).
That's good, isn't it? ;-)
C Problem
.
Lots of different servers send me bouncing and similar mails for it.
How could I filter them as spam, but 'good' returned mails exclude from it?
Maybe try something like this but add something to the header
contains none of to pick up your own genuine bounces - like your name...
TB! Message
Hi,
my emailaddress is massive used for spreading spam, I get every day
lots of emails from for me unknown server, telling me some message I
should have sent some someone there, can't be delivered.
Now I want to make a filter for that. But I don't know how and what...
The used emailaddres
I'm trying to set up a saved-search virtual folder to show all
messages with text in the Memo field. I've gotten it working by
setting it to search all memos for (a space character without
quotes). However, this won't find single-word memos.
Regular expressions don't seem to work here (or I
Hi group,
I want to create a filter rule which does the following:
Every not-gpg-signed email will get an automatic generated answer.
Exceptions:
- some guys from my contacts can be left out because they use bloody
webmailer anyway which makes it harder for them to install and use GPG
Hello REZK945,
I want to create a filter rule which does the following:
Every not-gpg-signed email will get an automatic generated answer.
I'm not familiar with gpg or pgp, etc., but I assume there must be
something unique to those messages. An specific header field, or textt
within the body
Hello Everyone,
I have another filter request and hope the experts here can provide me
with an easy to copy filter.
I am saving all attachments separate from the email body on my
harddrive in a special folder. Some of my partners seem to use outlook
and their emails also contain useless
Hi
On Saturday 26 January 2008 at 6:03:35 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Costas Papadopoulos
wrote:
One of my email addresses has recently started being flooded by
spam. I wonder which spam filtering program you would recommend
for me to use with The Bat.
I just use The Bat!'s own filters
retrieve these emails to your email programs. It has a
leaning filter but you can inspect all flagged emails prior to
processing. Once you process, then good emails are either downloaded to
your pc into your email program or deleted on the server and never
make it onto your pc.
--
Tom
using TheBat
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 at 08:03:35 +0200, Costas wrote:
One of my email addresses has recently started being flooded by
spam. I wonder which spam filtering program you would recommend for me to use
with The Bat.
I have used Popfile for several years very satisfactorily, but I use
it for more
Hi Costas,
on Saturday, January 26, 2008 at 07:03 you wrote in message
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
among others:
Hello,
One of my email addresses has recently started being flooded by
spam. I wonder which spam filtering program you would recommend for me to use
with The Bat.
I use MailWasher
Yasus Costas,
-- Samstag, 26. Januar 2008, 08:03:35:
One of my email addresses has recently started being flooded by
spam. I wonder which spam filtering program you would recommend for
me to use with The Bat.
I am also using Antispamsniper (ASS). A the beginning of last year
I've made a
I use Agava licensed version. But completely unsatisfied. Above all, their set
up file always setting up adware.They claim that it is auto removabl by license
key input, but exactly not!
If you have huge numbers of spam , i use MailWasher for business emails! It
works just great.
As a
Hi Costas,
One of my email addresses has recently started being flooded by
spam. I wonder which spam filtering program you would recommend for
me to use with The Bat.
Like Henk, I use AntiSpam Sniper, too. Only on rare occasions will a
previous version not work with an Alpha or Beta test
Hello Costas,
I wonder which spam filtering program you would recommend for me to
use with The Bat.
Yet another vote for AntispamSniper. Here are my current statistics:
Received messages: 46324
Error rate:0.28%
False negatives: 0.25%
False positives: 0.04%
--
Dave Goodman
The
Hello Robin,
Saturday, January 26, 2008, 10:08:50 AM, you wrote (possibly edited):
I have used Popfile for several years very satisfactorily, but I use
it for more than just classifying spam/not spam, I use it to classify
mail into multiple work and personal categories.
I decided to try out
Hello,
One of my email addresses has recently started being flooded by spam. I wonder
which spam filtering program you would recommend for me to use with The Bat.
Thanks for any advice.
--
Best regards,
Costas
Current version is 3.99.27.2 |
I use K9 (http://keir.net/k9.html) as an external program and am fully
satisfied with it. An exerpt from my stats :
- Time period : 380 days
- Number of mails processed : 4618
- percentage of good mail : 26.94%
- percentage of spam : 73.06%
- false positive : 10
- false negative : 8
It is an
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, at 08:03:35 [GMT +0200] (which was 7:03 where I
live) Costas Papadopoulos wrote:
One of my email addresses has recently started being flooded by spam.
I wonder which spam filtering program you would recommend for me to use with
The Bat.
I am using the free version of
Hello Ian and Henk,
Saturday, January 26, 2008, 8:39:19 AM, you wrote (possibly edited):
I am using the free version of Antispamsniper for the Bat! plugin and am very
pleased with it!
I know people who use Mailwasher Pro and they also say it's very good.
In my case I don't have any serious
Tuesday, January 22, 2008, 12:03:30 PM, you wrote:
T Anyway, I will try to inactivate the filter and see what happens
T first.
Don't inactivate any filter. Just take that frigging tickmark off the
Continue option in the first filter, that's all.
Thomas,
thanks again for your patience
Hello Tom,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:02:50 +1100 GMT (22/01/2008, 19:02 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
T thanks again for your patience.
T Everything is working fine now.
You are most welcome. Thanks for your feedback.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Was ist ein Optimist ? - Jemand der das eine Fernsehprogramm
Hello Tom,
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:09:12 +1100 GMT (21/01/2008, 11:09 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
T here we go again:
T 1. Filter:
This is in Account A. It moves the messages to the bounce folder in
Account B. You say it works.
T 2. Filter:
Is this also in Account A? Since the first filter is set
Hi
On Monday 21 January 2008 at 5:09:16 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Christopher W. wrote:
If you copy it into a new message, then you can hold down ALT and do a
columnar selection.
Wow that's cool! Is it a TB! feature or a general wp feature?
--
Best regards,
MFPA
Hi Christopher,
On Monday, January 21, 2008 at 12:09:16 AM you wrote:
C Thomas Fernandez @ 2008-1-20 7:56:57 PM
C Filter Help mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please post the filters without the at the beginning. The way
you posted them, I would have to copy from your mail into a word
processor, take
MFPA @ 2008-1-21 9:39:23 AM
Filter Help mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you copy it into a new message, then you can hold down ALT and
do a columnar selection.
Wow that's cool! Is it a TB! feature or a general wp feature?
It seems to be a feature of more powerful text editors, like MicroEd
and my
Monday, January 21, 2008, 11:08:29 PM, you wrote:
Hello Tom,
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:09:12 +1100 GMT (21/01/2008, 11:09 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
T here we go again:
T 1. Filter:
This is in Account A. It moves the messages to the bounce folder in
Account B. You say it works.
T 2. Filter
Hello Tom,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:16:29 +1100 GMT (22/01/2008, 04:16 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
T Thomas, thanks for your assistance. You are right with respect to the
T accounts but that does not fully solve the issue.
OK. Good that we are clear which filter is in which account.
T I understand
Hello Tom,
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:38:17 +1100 GMT (20/01/2008, 14:38 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
T What exactly do you want me to post? I thought I had provided the
T details of the filter already?
To post the filter, you right-click on it and choose copy. Then you
paste it into your message. I am
Thius may, or may not be connected with the other thread about filters, but
reading that has propted me to try and sort out a filter weirdeness that I
have been having.
My difficulty in explaining is related to not being sure about the
terminology for naming different species of folder.
I have
Sunday, January 20, 2008, 7:47:17 PM, you wrote:
To post the filter, you right-click on it and choose copy. Then you
paste it into your message. I am posting my TBUDL filter here for
demonstration:
Yes, but my guess is that you overlooked something.
thanks - I am sure you are right - here
Hi
On Sunday 20 January 2008 at 8:47:17 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Thomas
Fernandez wrote:
Yes, but my guess is that you overlooked something.
Like maybe a tick in continue processing with other filters?
--
Best regards,
MFPA
No matter where you go, there
Hello MFPA,
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:06:51 + GMT (21/01/2008, 04:06 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
Yes, but my guess is that you overlooked something.
M Like maybe a tick in continue processing with other filters?
We will see this when we import the filters.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
BALDERDASH:
Hello Tom,
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:39:16 +1100 GMT (21/01/2008, 03:39 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
T This filter is on the account that actually carries the incoming
T message:
TB! Message Filter
Please post the filters without the at the beginning. The way you
posted them, I would have
Monday, January 21, 2008, 12:56:57 PM, you wrote:
TB! Message Filter
Please post the filters without the at the beginning. The way you
posted them, I would have to copy from your mail into a word
processor, take all these quote marks out manually, and then copy from
Thomas Fernandez @ 2008-1-20 7:56:57 PM
Filter Help mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please post the filters without the at the beginning. The way
you posted them, I would have to copy from your mail into a word
processor, take all these quote marks out manually, and then copy
from
Hello Everyone,
despite testing, tweaking and tearing of hairs, I am still having
trouble with a specific filter and hope someone here can help me.
I would like to filter bounce messages coming from a website into
a specific folder. Customers receive a confirmation email when placing
orders
Hello Tom,
A reminder of what Tom typed on:
Saturday, January 19, 2008 at 10:41:08 GMT +1100
T Is there a better criteria I should look for in the header for my
T filter or another reason why my setup is failing. I just would like
T all incoming mails in Account B with the bounces separated
Hello Tom,
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:41:08 +1100 GMT (20/01/2008, 06:41 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
T This filter is set up as: if recipient contains [EMAIL PROTECTED] move to
T the folder \Account B\Customer in.
T This works fine.
T I put up a new filter ahead of this for the bounces:
T if Text
Sunday, January 20, 2008, 1:43:54 PM, you wrote:
Hello Tom,
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:41:08 +1100 GMT (20/01/2008, 06:41 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
T This filter is set up as: if recipient contains [EMAIL PROTECTED] move to
T the folder \Account B\Customer in.
T This works fine.
T I put up a new
Hello MAU,
Thursday, January 17, 2008, 2:01:26 PM, you wrote:
MAU Hello Peter,
What is wrong with my filtering? Thanks for the advise.
MAU Disable your filter and try a new one with:
MAU Header field - Reply-To - contains - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAU I have had mine set up that way for years
Hello Peter,
What is wrong with my filtering? Thanks for the advise.
Disable your filter and try a new one with:
Header field - Reply-To - contains - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have had mine set up that way for years and never failed.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using
This is a forwarded message
From: Peter Kerekes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TBUDL tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com
Date: Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 6:05:16 PM
Subject: Filter
===8==Original message text===
Hello,
I have set up filters to send messages to the proper folders
are nested
RG within another more powerful template... Yes?
QTs and external text files can be called by other templates, doesn't
matter whether the parent templates are account templates, AB
templates, filter templates or even quick templates.
When you're sending a message via command line parameters
whether the parent templates are account templates, AB
RO templates, filter templates or even quick templates.
RO You can use any macro in all kind of templates.
RO ... be carefull with fireworks!
Thanks for that... Then just to be sure I understand...
1- AB contact template will overwrite ANY
Hallo rich,
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:41:39 -0500GMT (31-12-2007, 20:41 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
RG Thanks for that... Then just to be sure I understand...
RG 1- AB contact template will overwrite ANY template
RG 2- Folder templates ONLY overwrite account templates
That's about it, yes.
by the filter.
RO You can access that template on the actions tab of the filter. Next
RO to the field with the destination address for the message there's an
RO icon for accessing the address book en next to that there's an icon
RO for accessing the template. I hope this helps.
Works like a dream
and
folder templates and now you experienced filter templates. But TB also
has address book templates, there are two kinds of AB templates, those
bound to individual AB entries and those that belong to AB groups.
Other templates are Quick Templates, you can call QTs from other
templates, but also straight
RG I'd seen templates mentioned before in filters but assumed (duh) that
RG they must be folder or account profile templates.
[EDITED]
RO TB offers templates on lots of places.
RO Account, folder, filter, address book (entry), address book (group),
RO external text file. Also see Quick Templates
for me.
You can alter the From: header of the created messages by using the
the %From=newaddress%- macro in the template used by the filter.
You can access that template on the actions tab of the filter. Next to
the field with the destination address for the message there's an icon
for accessing
Hello Bat-Folk!
I have set up 2 new filters in sorting office of v2.12 TB!
Both forward based on a matching SUBJECT string.
I'd like to have these filters automatically also change the FROM
address for me.
I do not see any field in the filter interface that'll do this... Any
pointers?
Thx much
Hi,
I have a filter that moves emails from a certain email address to a folder. How
do I add an exception to it? Specifically, I want the rule to only move the
emails from the inbox to this other folder if they don't contain the letters
re: or RE: or Re: (so in other words, if it is a reply
Hello Secret,
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:37:32 +1100 GMT (11/12/2007, 19:37 +0700 GMT),
Secret Squirrel wrote:
SS I have a filter that moves emails from a certain email address to
SS a folder. How do I add an exception to it? Specifically,
SS I want the rule to only move the emails from the inbox
Hello Secret,
A reminder of what Secret Squirrel typed on:
Tuesday, December 11, 2007 at 23:37:32 GMT +1100
SS I have a filter that moves emails from a certain email address to a
SS folder. How do I add an exception to it? Specifically, I want the rule
SS to only move the emails from
Hello Thomas,
Not sure I understand what you mean... To clarify, when I run
re-filter manually for my inbox TB appears to have captured the last
counts from the previous manual re-filter, so right now it's showing 6
messages in my inbox as being processed and 1 filtered. Instead of
clearing
Hello tbudl,
I get a lot of messages probably all spams written in Cyril character.
Since I cannot read them anyway, I would like to consider all of them as
spam and move them directly to the JUNK-MAIL folder, or even better
directly to TRASH folder.
Is there any way of doing this by
Hello TBUDL,
Whenever I re-filter my inbox, even if there are no messages to filter
TB reports that two messages have been filtered every single
time. Does anyone have a solution to this?
--
Best regards,
Tim
The Bat! v3.99.29
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Hello Tim,
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:06:45 -0700 GMT (17/11/2007, 02:06 +0700 GMT),
Tim Hamm wrote:
TH Whenever I re-filter my inbox, even if there are no messages to filter
TH TB reports that two messages have been filtered every single
TH time. Does anyone have a solution to this?
You
Hello Roelof,
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:46:46 +0100 GMT (31/10/2007, 22:46 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
M I there a way for the filters to work with all the accounts?
M Under 'sorting office - account' there is 'common filter'. what does
M this do?
RO Yep, that's the way, you create common
Hallo Vernon,
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:48:21 +0530GMT (31-10-2007, 6:18 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
M I there a way for the filters to work with all the accounts?
M Under 'sorting office - account' there is 'common filter'. what does
M this do?
Yep, that's the way, you create common filters
Hallo rich,
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:18:41 -0400GMT (30-10-2007, 6:18 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
RG The filter does a redirect. I see that MY email address is inserted as
RG they REPLY-TO. How can I clear that?
RG SORRY... That's RETURN-PATH is inserted and I want to strip that out.
You
Hello Members,
I have set up about 20 filter folders for a particular account. I am
presently running about 3 to 4 accounts.
I there a way for the filters to work with all the accounts?
Under 'sorting office - account' there is 'common filter'. what does
this do?
Is there any way to transfer
RG If I try to put the username on one line and the domain on
RG another line as strings then EITHER string triggers the filter.
RO Do you mean as an extra condition on the 'alternatives' tab? To
RO use two conditions on the primary rule will require both
RO condition to match in order to trigger
RG If I try to put the username on one line and the domain on another
RG line as strings then EITHER string triggers the filter.
RO Do you mean as an extra condition on the 'alternatives' tab? To use
RO two conditions on the primary rule will require both condition to
RO match in order to trigger
Hallo rich,
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:53:49 -0400GMT (28-10-2007, 2:53 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
RG I f I try to put the username on one line and the domain on another
RG line as strings then EITHER string triggers the filter.
RO Do you mean as an extra condition on the 'alternatives' tab
Hallo rich,
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 22:41:33 -0400GMT (27-10-2007, 4:41 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RG I tried to make a (ver 2.12) filter to trigger on an incoming email
RG address but it seems like when I have the @ sign in the string the
RG filter does not trigger.
It should be possible
RG I tried to make a (ver 2.12) filter to trigger on an incoming email
RG address but it seems like when I have the @ sign in the string the
RG filter does not trigger.
RO It should be possible to filter on complete addresses. Back in the
RO days I was using v1 or v2, I could filter on complete
Hello Bat-Folk!
I tried to make a (ver 2.12) filter to trigger on an incoming email
address but it seems like when I have the @ sign in the string the
filter does not trigger.
I f I try to put the username on one line and the domain on another line
as strings then EITHER string triggers
Hello Neal,
Thursday, October 11, 2007, 8:23:51 PM, among other things, you wrote:
NL I've been trying to figure out how to get a signal string text file to
NL work in v3.x filter. I want to kill messages on the server and have an
NL external word list. Do I put a macro in filter condition
Hi Roger,
Tuesday, October 16, 2007, 12:17:12 AM, you wrote:
NL I've been trying to figure out how to get a signal string text file to
NL work in v3.x filter. I want to kill messages on the server and have an
NL external word list. Do I put a macro in filter condition or what?
If you go
Hello Neal,
Tuesday, October 16, 2007, 5:08:56 PM, among other things, you wrote:
If you go into the Sorting Office (Shft+Ctrl+S) and Right Click on the
Selective Download title and then choose New Filter, you will find that at
the bottom of the right hand panel is an item 'Load
Roger,
NL No problem - I'm there - but the filter does not seem to pick up the
NL file.
That is what I meant about often being not functional. It seems things
have not changed.
I looked to see it there was a bug report on it, but I guess not.
Maybe I'll make one.
NL My spam is so out
Hello listers,
I've been trying to figure out how to get a signal string text file to
work in v3.x filter. I want to kill messages on the server and have an
external word list. Do I put a macro in filter condition or what?
--
Regards, Neal
Using TheBat! v3.99.24 (BETA) on Windows XP Service
I am in the process of moving one of my accounts from POP to IMAP.
Everything seems to be going fine (so far). I've started to move my
filters over.
I ran into a weird problem though. I am on a high traffic
announcements mailing list. I have a filter that moves these messages
into their own
Hello Roelof,
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:08:12 +0200 your time, you said:
RO The latter is why I love filtering on AB groups, though my groups are
RO collected in group related folders.
Thanks again for your help on this. I eventually plumped for:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and checked 'automatically
' filter a bit to do what I want with this.
Everyone I regularly communicate with is in my addressbook. I like to
keep conversations with people in my AB together, so after all the
filters that handle lists, newsletters and whatmore, I have the 'Known'
filter at the bottom that splits out all remaining
Hello TBUDL:
Please forgive my ignorance, but could someone please tell me if it is
possible to create 'filter groups'?
I can't find a definitive answer to this question (and I have looked) so
please forgive me if this question has been asked to death and answered
over and over
Hallo Simon,
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 14:28:29 +0100GMT (10-9-2007, 15:28 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
IT Please forgive my ignorance, but could someone please tell me if it is
IT possible to create 'filter groups'?
No.
IT If I create a main filter in the Sorting Office and call
Hello Roelof,
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:35:31 +0200 your time, you said:
IT Please forgive my ignorance, but could someone please tell me if it is
IT possible to create 'filter groups'?
RO No.
Hmm, great. I was hoping that wasn't going ot be the case...still.
So just to make absolutely clear
Hallo Simon,
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:02:14 +0100GMT (10-9-2007, 17:02 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
IT So just to make absolutely clear, so I'm left in no doubt, this means then,
IT if I have 45 people belonging to a private group/list/forum whatever, and I
IT can only filter against
Hello Roelof,
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:00:36 +0200 your time, you said:
[...snip...]
RO Create an AB group 'filter contacts' and add those 45 people to it.
[...snip...]
RO Now you've got two choices, either you want all of them moved to the
RO same folder or you want to move each message
[EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 2007-9-10 11:42:15 AM
Sub Filters: can I create 'filter groups'? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Really, I suppose it boils down to cosmetics and preference at the
end of the day. I mean that organising particular contacts into a
'group' in AB and filtering against the AB group
group will still mean just as much effort setting
IT up as creating indiviudal filters for each email address under the Sorting
IT Office.
There are two major differences.
You'll only need to add them once to your AB group, whereas you'd
need to create every filter twice.
When your contacts change
Hello Roelof,
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:08:12 +0200 your time, you said:
RO When your contacts change their addresses (or use multiple addresses)
RO you can easily add them to your AB (you'd do that anyway), but you don't
RO need to adjust your filters. The latter is why I love filtering on AB
RO
Fellow Bat! Fans.
Any easy way to move (or copy) a whole bunch of filters from one
account to another, or to make existing filters common filters?
BTW, am I to understand that a common filter will apply to all
ticked accounts? I presume this is the case but feel I may be getting
that this means that your old filters in the target account will
be lost.
JP BTW, am I to understand that a common filter will apply to all
JP ticked accounts? I presume this is the case but feel I may be getting
JP (not a scientific feel mind you) some strange results.
I don't use common filters
Roelof,
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007, at 12:41:09 [GMT +0200] (20:41:09 05/09/2007
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:
I don't use common filters myself, two of my three accounts are merely
for some testing, so I don't need any filtering there.
snip, etc.
Thanks for the help.
--
Regards,
John
John Phillips @ 2007-8-04 5:15:03 PM
Need help with filter mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have three isp accounts. Looks like when you have more than one
isp, the Spam folder must be a common folder.
I don't have that problem and I have 5 accounts. What version of The
Bat! are you using? What anti
of the filters is important. Every message is compared to
RO the filter conditions in the order of the filters in the sorting
RO office. TB starts with matching the common filters and after that it
RO continues with the account filters.
RO As soon as TB has a match the comparing is stopped and the filter
matched subfilter, unless the matched
subfilter has continue... set and filtering will continue until the
next matching subfilters.
Though no filtering of normal filters will occur. Unless the parent
filter had continue... checked, of course.
G Once a subfilter is matched, is *all* matching stopped
(and version)?
I am using 3.99.3, and not a plug in, but K9.
Further investigation reveals that I have a common filter for Spam as
well, and this was probably conflicting with the other filters.
BTW a nice feature to see in Bat! would possibly be in Properties a
list of all filters applying
201 - 300 of 3249 matches
Mail list logo
